Print version ISSN 1516-3180
Sao Paulo Med. J. vol.118 n.4 São Paulo July 2000
Sandra Baltazar Guatura
José Antônio Baddini Martinez
Patricia Cincotto dos Santos Bueno
Manuel Lopes dos Santos
Increased exhalation of hydrogen peroxide in healthy subjects following cigarette consumption
Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo/
Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
CONTEXT: Increased hydrogen peroxide has been described in the expired breath condensate (H2O2-E) of several lung conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. This technique has been advocated as being a simple method for documenting airway inflammation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate H2O2-E in healthy cigarette smokers, and to determine the acute effects of the consumption of one cigarette on H2O2-E levels.
TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective, controlled trial.
SETTING: A pulmonary function laboratory in a University Hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of healthy volunteers: individuals who had never smoked (NS; n=10; 4 men; age = 30.6 ± 6.2 years) and current cigarette smokers (S; n=12; 7 men; age = 38.7 ± 9.8). None of the volunteers had respiratory symptoms and all showed normal spirometric tests.
INTERVENTION: Expired air was collected from all volunteers through a face mask and a plastic collecting system leading into a flask with dry ice and pure ethanol. Samples from the group S were collected twice, before and half an hour after the combustion of one cigarette.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Expired hydrogen peroxide using the Gallati and Pracht method.
RESULTS: The S and NS groups showed comparable levels of H2O2-E at basal conditions [NS = 0.74 mM (DP 0.24) vs. S = 0.75 mM (DP 0.31)]. The smokers showed a significant increase in H2O2-E levels half an hour after the consumption of only one cigarette [0.75 mM (DP 0.31) vs. 0.95 mM (DP 0.22)].
CONCLUSION: The present results are consistent with the concept that smokers increase oxidative stress with elevated production of reactive oxygen species, contributing to the development of smoking-related disorders.
KEY WORDS: Hydrogen peroxide. Smoking. Free radicals.
An imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants has been considered in the pathogenesis of smoking induced lung diseases, such as lung cancer and emphysema. Oxidative stress, which causes an elevation of reactive oxidant species (ROS) may cause a protease-antiprotease imbalance in the lower airways, inducing DNA damage in epithelial cells leading to proteolytic lung injury and carcinogenesis.1,2
The increased exposure of smokers' pulmonary tissues to ROS may result from the inhalation of a large amount of oxidants and free radicals present in cigarette smoke.3,4 Another, and possibly more important source of ROS in the lungs of smokers, is the enhanced recruitment of mononuclear phagocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes to the lower airways. Activation of these inflammatory cells induces a respiratory burst resulting in marked production of superoxide anion. This oxidant species undergoes spontaneous or enzyme-catalyzed demutation to form hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).3,4 Thus, hydrogen peroxide levels reflect both divalent reduction of oxygen and the demutation of superoxide. Hydrogen peroxide appears to be an important inflammatory mediator itself causing cellular injury and, via further reactions, generating other ROS such as hydroxyl radicals and lipid peroxidation products.3,4
Production of H2O2 has been used in vitro to quantify the respiratory burst of neutrophils.5 Different reports have also demonstrated increased hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath condensate (H2O2-E) of several clinical conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma.6-10 This noninvasive technique has been advocated as a simple method for documenting airway inflammation. Therefore, the present study was designed to evaluate H2O2-E in healthy cigarette smokers, and to determine the acute effects of the consumption of one cigarette on H2O2-E levels.
After Hospital Ethical Committee approval, two groups of subjects were studied: those who had never smoked (NS, n = 10) and current cigarette smokers (S, n = 12). None of the individuals had a history of chronic pulmonary disorders or signs of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in the two months prior to collection of the samples. All subjects showed normal values in spirometric tests, and there were no differences between the groups regarding these spirometric parameters (Tables 1 and 2). The S group was significantly older than the NS group [mean age in years, 30.6 (SD 6.2) vs. 38.7 (SD 9.8); P<0.05). The average degree of total smoking exposure for group S was 16.2 (SD 8.6) pack-years. The mean number of cigarettes consumed by group S at the time of the study was 14.3 (SD 5.2) cigarettes per day (Table 2).
All the expired breath samples were collected in the morning. The smokers were requested to refrain from smoking after 10 P.M. Initially, pulmonary function data were obtained using a VitaTrace spirometer, model VT 130 SL. Subsequently, the participants were asked to breath through a face mask with a one-way valve. The expired air was conducted through a plastic tube connected to a sterile collecting system, leading into a flask containing dry ice and pure ethanol. In this way, approximately 2 ml of breath condensate were collected within 30 minutes of tidal breathing. The samples were immediately stored in a freezer at 80 oC. After the initial sampling, the subjects of the S group were asked to smoke one commercially available cigarette of a popular brand. Half an hour after the end of this cigarette a second collection of expired breath condensate was made.
The measurements of H2O2 were all made in the same way, using the method described by Gallati and Pracht.11 In brief, 100 ml of 420 mM 3,3¢,5,5¢-tetramethylbenzidine (dissolved in 0.42 M citrate buffer, pH 3.8) and 10 ml of 52.5 U/ml of horseradish peroxidase type II (HRP, Sigma Chemicals) were added to 100 ml of the condensate. The reaction proceeded for 20 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, the mixture was acidified to a pH of 1 with 10 ml of 18 N sulfuric acid. The reaction product was measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm using an automated microplate reader (Flow/ICN Biomedicals, model Titertek Multiskan MCC340). The absorbance at 450 nm is directly proportional to the concentration of H2O2. All samples were measured in duplicate and the mean values were used for analysis.
The spirometry measurements were expressed as percentages of the predicted values for normal populations using classic equations.12,13 All of the results are shown as mean and standard deviation. Statistical comparisons between groups of pulmonary function data and basal H2O2-E levels were done using Student's t test. Statistical comparisons of H2O2-E levels in the S group, before and after smoking, were obtained using a paired t test. Pearson coefficients were performed to evaluate correlation between the H2O2-E levels and cigarette smoking status. Statistical significance was assumed when P < 0.05.
Hydrogen peroxide was detected in the expiratory breath condensate of all those who had never smoked at concentrations ranging between 0.43 and 1.21 mM. The mean and standard deviation of the H2O2-E values for the NS group were 0.74 mM (SD 0.24) (Figure 1). Hydrogen peroxide was also detected in the breath condensate of all of group S under basal conditions, at levels ranging between 0.29 and 1.07 mM. The mean and standard deviation of the H2O2-E values for the S group were 0.75 mM (SD 0.31). Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between group S and group NS H2O2-E basal levels (Figure 1). In addition, there were no significant correlations found between initial H2O2-E levels and the total or present smoking history for group S subjects (r = 0.125 and r = 0.057, respectively).
Group S showed a mean H2O2-E value of 0.95 mM (SD 0.22) for samples collected half an hour after the subjects had smoked a regular cigarette. The H2O2-E levels post-smoking [0.95 mM (SD 0.22)] were significantly higher than the basal values [0.75 mM (SD 0.31)] (Figure 2).
Investigations of chemical compounds in the exhaled air should be scrutinized by respiratory biology researchers because they may lead to the development of methods for evaluating inflammation of the lung parenchyma and airways. For example, several studies have demonstrated measurable amounts of nitric oxide in human expired gas, both under physiological and pathological conditions, and this observation has attracted growing interest in this field.14-16
The first description of hydrogen peroxide in the expired air of humans was in 1983.17 Since then high H2O2-E levels have been detected under a number of different conditions such as ARDS, asthma and COPD.6-10 Although such results strongly suggest a role for expired hydrogen peroxide as a marker for respiratory tract inflammation, the number of investigations and publications in the area remains small.
Recently a study by Horvath et al.18 evaluated the relationship between nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide in the exhaled air of asthmatic patients and also evaluated bronchial hyperreactivity, pulmonary function tests, and cellular counts of induced sputum. These results suggested for the first time that H2O2-E might be a more sensitive and reliable marker of airway inflammation than exhaled nitric oxide in this population.
Smoking is the most important risk factor for COPD and lung cancer, and it is believed by some that the generation of ROS in the lower airways may substantially contribute to the pathogenesis of these disorders.2,3 In such conditions, the detection of high levels of H2O2-E in smokers with no clinical or functional evidence of disease, would add credibility to the hypothesis that H2O2 contributes significantly to the pathogenic mechanisms of smoking-related diseases. In addition, this type of measurement could become a useful clinical tool, able to detect subjects with smoking-induced pulmonary inflammation at its very earliest stages.
In the present study hydrogen peroxide was detected in the expired breath condensate of all NS subjects. In fact, the measured levels were well above the values previously described for non-smoking volunteers in the literature.9,10 These differences could result from contamination of breath condensate with saliva that contains high amounts of hydrogen peroxide. In this study we used a whole facemask and, since the volunteers were required to breathe nasally, the chances of significant saliva contamination is quite small. Such findings could also be explained by the type of equipment we have employed for collecting condensate. Most of the researchers in the field have previously collected expired condensate through endotracheal tubes or via oral breathing. Using a facemask and nasal breathing, we have collected condensate that could reflect the metabolism of lung parenchyma and upper airways as well. In such a situation the upper airways and paranasal sinus could be a significant source of H2O2-E, in a similar way to that already described for nitric oxide.19 A third important possibility for explaining these differences is related to the quality of the air in São Paulo city. Air pollution is still a health concern in this big city and its effects on the H2O2-E levels are at present unknown. The S group also had a significantly higher mean age than the NS group. As the influences of aging on H2O2-E levels are presently unknown, this difference may be a potential source of bias in our results. Further studies are necessary to clarify such aspects.
Group S showed a significant increase in the mean H2O2-E level, half an hour after the consumption of only one cigarette (Figure 2). In part, this finding may be due to inhalation of H2O2 originating from the cigarette combustion and possibly still present in the airways at the time of the condensate collection. This is unlikely since the thirty minutes rest period should have been enough to dissipate most of the inhaled hydrogen peroxide accumulated in the airways from cigarette combustion alone. Cigarette smoke has about 5 x 1014 free radicals per inhalation which, in contact with the wet surfaces of the respiratory epithelium, can generate superoxide radicals and H2O2.3,4 In addition, such smoke-generated radicals may damage cellular membranes in the respiratory tract leading to lipid peroxidation and additional oxidative stress.2,3,4 Therefore, the present increases in H2O2-E levels thirty minutes after cigarette consumption probably reflect acute, smoking-induced, paranasal, upper and lower airway and lung parenchyma injuries. Another contributory factor in these findings may be the acute influx and sequestration of inflammatory cells in the lung parenchyma. It has been shown that cigarette smoking can acutely promote pulmonary vascular retention of marked neutrophils.20 The mechanisms related to this phenomenon are not completely understood, but may involve activation of adhesion molecules, changes in leukocyte cytoskeletons, and local hemodynamic disorders.20-22 Whatever the mechanisms involved, the acute elevation of H2O2-E levels found in this study reflect ROS respiratory overloading secondary to the smoking habit.
The S and NS groups showed comparable levels of H2O2-E under basal conditions (Figure 1). This suggests that smoking leads to transient changes in the H2O2-E, which returns to normal levels in healthy subjects after some hours of abstinence. Our results disagree with a recent paper which reported a fivefold increase in basal H2O2-E for a group of 33 cigarette smokers in comparison to 27 non-smokers.23 Although the authors had included in their investigation only subjects without respiratory symptoms and with a normal physical examination, pulmonary function tests were not performed. Therefore we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the smoking individuals in that study had asymptomatic COPD.
Dekhuijzen et al.9 have shown that increased H2O2-E occurs in subjects with stable COPD and even more so in patients with an exacerbation of COPD. Our data shows at least the occurrence of transient elevations of H2O2-E after challenging healthy individuals by cigarette smoking. Therefore we can hypothesize that there may be an initial phase in the evolution of COPD, when high levels of H2O2-E are continuously found in subjects without significant respiratory complaints. This event may happen in COPD-susceptible smokers for whom an oxidant load would repeatedly overcome the antioxidant protection in the lower airways. In this scenario the measurement of H2O2-E could become a sensitive and non-invasive method for showing enhanced generation of ROS, and may be used to detect subjects with a higher risk for developing smoking-related pulmonary diseases. Larger and more complete studies will need to be performed to confirm this hypothesis.
Increased H2O2-E occurs in healthy subjects after the consumption of only one cigarette. Although such elevation could just be a marker of smoking, this result is consistent with the concept that, in smokers, elevated production of ROS increases oxidative stress, which may contribute to the development of smoking-related diseases.
1. Cross CE, Halliwell B, Borish ET, Pryor WA, Ames BN, Saul RL, McCord JM, Harman D. Oxygen radicals and human disease. Ann Intern Med 1987;107:526-45. [ Links ]
2. Rahman I, MacNee W. Role of oxidants/antioxidants in smoking-induced lung diseases. Free Rad Biol Med 1996;21:669-81. [ Links ]
3. Pryor W, Stone K. Oxidants in cigarette smoke. Radicals, hydrogen peroxide, peroxynitrate and peroxynitrite. Ann N York Acad Sci 1993;686:12-27. [ Links ]
4. Niki E, Minamisawa S, Oikawa M, Komuro E. Membrane damage from lipid oxidation induced by free radicals and cigarette smoke. Ann N York Acad Sci 1993;686:29-38. [ Links ]
5. Hyslop PA, Sklar LA. A quantitative fluorometric assay for the determination of oxidant production by polymorphonuclear leukocytes: its use in the simultaneous fluorometric assay of cellular activation processes. Anal Bioch 1984;141:280-6. [ Links ]
6. Baldwin SR, Grum CM, Boxer LA, Simon RH, Ketai LH, Devall LJ. Oxidant activity in expired breath of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet 1986;1:11-4. [ Links ]
7. Sznajder JI, Fraiman A, Hall JB, et al. Increased hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest 1989;96:606-12. [ Links ]
8. Kietzmann D, Kahl R, Müller M, Burchardi H, Kettler D. Hydrogen peroxides in expired breath condensate of patients with acute respiratory failure and with ARDS. Int Care Med 1993;19:78-81. [ Links ]
9. Dekhuijzen PNR, Aben KKH, Dekker I, et al. Increased exhalation of hydrogen peroxide in patients with stable and unstable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:813-6. [ Links ]
10. Dohlman AW, Black HR, Royall JA. Expired breath hydrogen peroxide is a marker of acute airway inflammation in pediatric patients with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1993;148:955-60. [ Links ]
11. Gallati H, Pracht I. Horseradish peroxidase: kinetic studies and optimization of peroxidase activity determination using the substrates H2O2 and 3,3¢,5,5¢-tetramethylbenzidine. J Clin Chem Clin Bioch 1985;23:453-60. [ Links ]
12. Knudson RJ, Slatin RC, Lebowitz MD. The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve: normal standards, variability, and effects of age. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976;113:587-600. [ Links ]
13. Crapo RO, Morris AH, Gardner RM. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:659-64. [ Links ]
14. Lundeberg JON, Weitzberg E, Lundberg JM, Alving K. Nitric oxide in exhaled air. Eur Respir J 1996;9:2671-80. [ Links ]
15. Barnes PJ, Kharitonov SA. Exhaled nitric oxide: a new lung function test. Thorax 1996;51:233-7. [ Links ]
16. Singh S, Evans TW. Nitric oxide, the biological mediator of the decade: fact or fiction? Eur Respir J 1997;10:699-707. [ Links ]
17. Williams MD, Chance B. Spontaneous chemiluminescence of human breath. Spectrum, lifetime, temporal distribution, and correlation with peroxide. J Biol Chem 1983;258:3628-31. [ Links ]
18. Horvath I, Donnely LE, Kiss A, et al. Combined use of exhaled hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide in monitoring asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1042-6. [ Links ]
19. Silkoff PE, McClean PA, Caramori M, Slutsky AS, Zamel N. A significant proportion of exhaled nitric oxide arises in large airways in normal subjects. Respir Physiol 1998;113:33-8. [ Links ]
20. MacNee W, Wiggs B, Belzberg AS, Hogg JC. The effect of cigarette smoking on neutrophil kinetics in human lungs. N E J M 1989;321:924-8. [ Links ]
21. Drost EM, Selby C, Bridgeman MME, MacNee W. Decreased leukocyte deformability after acute cigarette smoking in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:1277-83. [ Links ]
22. Skwarski KM, Gorecka D, Sliwinski P, Hogg JC, MacNee W. The effects of cigarette smoking on pulmonary hemodynamics. Chest 1993;103:166-72. [ Links ]
23. Nowac D, Antczak A, Krol M, et al. Increased content of hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath of cigarette smokers. Eur Respir J 1996;9:652-7. [ Links ]
CONTEXTO: Elevações do peróxido de hidrogênio exalado (H2O2-E) tem sido descritas em diversas doenças pulmonares tais como a síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo, doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica e asma. Essa técnica tem sido preconizada como um método simples capaz de refletir inflamação ao nível das vias aéreas.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar os níveis de H2O2-E em indivíduos normais e determinar os efeitos agudos do consumo de um cigarro sobre seus valores.
TIPO DE ESTUDO: Ensaio clínico, prospectivo, controlado.
LOCAL: Laboratório de função pulmonar de um Hospital Universitário.
PARTICIPANTES: Dois grupos de voluntários sadios: indivíduos que nunca fumaram [NS; n = 10; 4 homens; idade = 30,6 anos (DP 6,2)] e indivíduos fumantes atuais [S; n = 12; 7 homens; idade = 38,7 anos (DP 9,8)]. Todos os voluntários não apresentavam sintomas respiratórios e exibiam testes espirométricos dentro da normalidade.
INTERVENÇÃO: Ar expirado foi coletado de todos os voluntários utilizando-se uma máscara facial e um sistema colocado em um frasco com gelo seco e etanol absoluto. Amostras do grupo S foram coletadas duas vezes, antes e meia hora após o consumo de um cigarro.
VARIÁVEIS ESTUDADAS: Peróxido de hidrogênio expirado utilizando-se o método de Gallati e Pracht.
RESULTADOS: Ambos os grupos mostraram níveis comparáveis de H2O2-E em condições basais [NS = 0,74 mM (DP 0,24) vs. S = 0,75 mM (DP 0,31)]. Os fumantes mostraram um aumento significante dos níveis de H2O2-E meia hora após o consumo de apenas um cigarro [0,75 mM (DP 0,31) vs. 0,95 mM (DP 0,22)].
CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos estão de acordo com o conceito de que o consumo de cigarros aumenta o estresse oxidativo com produção elevada de espécies reativas do oxigênio (ROS) contribuindo para o desenvolvimento de doenças relacionadas ao tabagismo.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Peróxido de hidrogênio. Tabagismo. Radicais livres.
Sandra Baltazar Guatura, MSc. Pulmonary Division, Federal University of São Paulo / Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Antônio Baddini Martinez, MD, PhD. Professor, Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Patricia Cincotto dos Santos Bueno, PhD. Pulmonary Division, Federal University of São Paulo / Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manuel Lopes dos Santos, MD, PhD. Full Professor, Pulmonary Division, Federal University of São Paulo / Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sources of funding: SBG was supported by CAPES (nº 132.276/95-0)
Conflict of interest: Not declared
Last received: 10 January 2000
Accepted: 18 January 2000
Address for correspondence:
José Antônio Baddini Martinez
Departamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto
Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900 6º andar
Ribeirão Preto/SP Brasil - CEP: 14048-900