Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Two consecutive intrauterine pregnancies following transperitoneal ovum migration

Duas gestações intrauterinas consecutivas após migração transperitoneal do óvulo

Abstracts

CONTEXT: Transperitoneal migration is a mechanism for oocyte retrieval that is generally demonstrated in certain cases of ectopic pregnancy. However, the association between these two conditions is debatable. The rare occasions on which intrauterine pregnancy following transperitoneal migration can be documented are an opportunity for studying this topic. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a female with a history of salpingectomy due to an ectopic pregnancy at 31 years of age. Two subsequent pregnancies were intrauterine. In both of them, ultrasound revealed that the corpus luteum was located in the ovary ipsilateral to the salpingectomy. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of two intrauterine pregnancies following transperitoneal migration, carried to term, and resulting in the delivery of two healthy children. The clinical and physiological implications are discussed.

Pregnancy, ectopic; Ultrasonography; Prenatal care; Hysterosalpingography; Infertility


CONTEXTO: A migração transperitoneal é um mecanismo de captação do oócito demonstrado, em geral, em determinados casos de gravidez ectópica. No entanto, a associação entre ambas é discutível. As raras ocasiões em que uma gestação intrauterina após migração transperitoneal pode ser documentada são uma oportunidade para o estudo deste tópico. RELATO DE CASO: Relatamos o caso de uma mulher com salpingectomia aos 31 anos, por gravidez ectópica. Duas gestações subsequentes foram intrauterinas. Em ambas, ultrassonografia evidenciou presença do corpo lúteo em ovário do mesmo lado da salpingectomia. CONCLUSÃO: No nosso conhecimento, trata-se do primeiro caso relatado com duas gestações intrauterinas após migração transperitoneal, terminadas com o nascimento de duas crianças saudáveis. As implicações clínicas e fisiológicas são discutidas.

Gravidez ectópica; Ultrassonografia; Cuidado pré-natal; Histerossalpingografia; Infertilidade


CASE REPORT

Two consecutive intrauterine pregnancies following transperitoneal ovum migration

Duas gestações intrauterinas consecutivas após migração transperitoneal do óvulo

Adriano Barreto NogueiraI; Ariel Barreto NogueiraII; Fernanda Regina GemiIII

IMD. Intensivist and neurosurgeon, Lecel Clínica Médica, São Paulo, Brazil

IIMD. General practitioner, Lecel Clínica Médica, São Paulo, Brazil

IIIMD. Obstetrician and postgraduate student (sensu lato), Obstetrics and Gynecology Group, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil

Address for correspondence Address for correspondence: Adriano Barreto Nogueira Rua Dr. Alfredo Valentini, 233 Centro - Pindamonhangaba (SP) - Brasil CEP 12400-360 Tel. (+55 11) 7144-6463 E-mail: adrianobarreto@uol.com.br

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Transperitoneal migration is a mechanism for oocyte retrieval that is generally demonstrated in certain cases of ectopic pregnancy. However, the association between these two conditions is debatable. The rare occasions on which intrauterine pregnancy following transperitoneal migration can be documented are an opportunity for studying this topic.

CASE REPORT: We report the case of a female with a history of salpingectomy due to an ectopic pregnancy at 31 years of age. Two subsequent pregnancies were intrauterine. In both of them, ultrasound revealed that the corpus luteum was located in the ovary ipsilateral to the salpingectomy.

CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of two intrauterine pregnancies following transperitoneal migration, carried to term, and resulting in the delivery of two healthy children. The clinical and physiological implications are discussed.

Key words: Pregnancy, ectopic. Ultrasonography. Prenatal care. Hysterosalpingography. Infertility.

RESUMO

CONTEXTO: A migração transperitoneal é um mecanismo de captação do oócito demonstrado, em geral, em determinados casos de gravidez ectópica. No entanto, a associação entre ambas é discutível. As raras ocasiões em que uma gestação intrauterina após migração transperitoneal pode ser documentada são uma oportunidade para o estudo deste tópico.

RELATO DE CASO: Relatamos o caso de uma mulher com salpingectomia aos 31 anos, por gravidez ectópica. Duas gestações subsequentes foram intrauterinas. Em ambas, ultrassonografia evidenciou presença do corpo lúteo em ovário do mesmo lado da salpingectomia.

CONCLUSÃO: No nosso conhecimento, trata-se do primeiro caso relatado com duas gestações intrauterinas após migração transperitoneal, terminadas com o nascimento de duas crianças saudáveis. As implicações clínicas e fisiológicas são discutidas.

Palavras-chave: Gravidez ectópica. Ultrassonografia. Cuidado pré-natal. Histerossalpingografia. Infertilidade.

INTRODUCTION

The mechanism of oocyte retrieval in humans is not completely understood. Direct observation of this mechanism through hydrolaparoscopy has shown that the fallopian tube on the side of ovulation plays a key role in oocyte retrieval.1,2 Another possible mechanism, transperitoneal migration, has been reported.3-16 There is some difficulty in determining whether transperitoneal migration exists and how frequently it might occur, because of the limited number of clinical conditions under which it might be detected.

In this study, we report the case of a female with a history of right salpingectomy due to an ectopic pregnancy. In two subsequent intrauterine pregnancies, an ultrasound examination was performed within the first weeks, and it revealed that ovulation had taken place on the side ipsilateral to the salpingectomy. The reporting of cases such as this one provides data relating to the physiology and physiopathology of human reproduction, and may have clinical implications for the treatment of certain cases of subfertility.

CASE REPORT

In September 2004, a 31-year-old female presented with vaginal bleeding. Her last menstruation had occurred 50 days earlier, when attempts to conceive had begun. During the prenatal investigation, the patient had been diagnosed with irregular menstrual periods and asymptomatic hypothyroidism. Thyroxine (50 µg/day) had been prescribed to regulate the levels of thyroid stimulating hormone. Because the bleeding persisted for longer than normal and was accompanied by abdominal pain, the patient sought medical assistance, at a private clinic in São Paulo, Brazil. Ultrasound revealed an echogenic image (probably a clot or dilated tube), measuring 25 mm × 21 mm × 21 mm, with a 8 mm anechoic image (probably a gestational sac) in the right paraovarian region, as well as an image suggestive of a large quantity of blood in the pouch of Douglas (Figure 1). The serum level of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) was high (2,300 IU/l). The patient underwent right salpingectomy. The procedure was uneventful and the patient was discharged on the second postoperative day. Anatomopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.


In December 2004, the patient began new attempts to conceive. Because the attempts were unsuccessful and her menstrual periods were irregular, the patient was started on oral progesterone replacement therapy in June 2005. At this time, the couple was also examined to determine the cause of the infertility. Hysterosalpingography showed the presence of the right fallopian tube as far as its middle third and a patent left fallopian tube, with normal diameter and preserved mucosal folds. There was normal dispersion of the contrast medium within the peritoneal cavity (Figure 2).


After attempting to conceive for 16 months, the couple was referred to an infertility clinic. In vitro fertilization was scheduled for the following cycle. However, the couple conceived during that same cycle. The pregnancy was diagnosed through delayed menstruation and a β-HCG level of 7,312 IU/l. Because of the high risk of another ectopic pregnancy, an ultrasound examination was requested. Intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed, and the estimated gestational age was 6 weeks. The right ovary was enlarged and contained a cyst of 2 cm in diameter, which was probably the corpus luteum (Figure 3). The patient went into labor at gestational week 40. However, due to labor dystocia, a Cesarean section was performed. A healthy boy, weighing 3,775 g, was delivered.


The patient resumed menstruation at seven months after delivery. Two months after the return of menses, the couple again began attempts to conceive. Conception occurred four months later, while the patient was still breastfeeding. When the pregnancy was diagnosed, the serum level of β-HCG was 1,719 IU/l. For the same reasons as in the first pregnancy, an ultrasound examination was requested (Figure 4), and intrauterine pregnancy was again confirmed. The right ovary was larger than the left and was seen to contain a simple cyst, of 1.2 cm in diameter. At 39 weeks of gestation, a healthy boy, weighing 3,810 g, was born via vaginal delivery.


DISCUSSION

Oocyte retrieval by the fimbriae is a stage of human reproduction rarely observed clinically. One technique that allows observation of this process under physiological conditions is transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy.1,2 Through transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy, vascular congestion causing erection of the fimbriae on the side of ovulation can be observed. The fimbriae move closer to the caudal pole of the ovary responsible for the release of the cumulus oophorus, and movements relating to the vascular congestion aid in the retrieval of the oocyte.

During oocyte retrieval, it has been reported that the contralateral fallopian tube remains unaltered.1,2 However, the authors of that report, who also proposed transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy, themselves speculated about the potential limitations of their method. The changes observed in the fallopian tube on the side of ovulation suggest that the ovary may participate in oocyte retrieval. The control exerted by the ovary might be due to release of β-estradiol, which has a vasodilatory effect. During hydrolaparoscopy, it is possible that the saline solution used causes dilution of β-estradiol, which would explain the lack of changes in the contralateral fallopian tube. In addition, only a small number of cases have been investigated using transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy.

Experimental studies in animals and clinical observations in humans have provided evidence of the existence of external migration of spermatozoa or ova. Intrauterine pregnancy has been diagnosed in rabbits subjected to oophorectomy and contralateral salpingectomy.12 There is also clinical evidence of another physiological mechanism for oocyte retrieval,16 through which the oocyte is released into the pouch of Douglas, with an equal chance of being retrieved by either fallopian tube.

Although oocyte retrieval is not fully understood, clinical evidence suggestive of transperitoneal migration has been reported.3-16 In such cases, fallopian tube obstruction, due to congenital malformations or acquired conditions, has been observed. Another condition under which transperitoneal migration has been documented is a non-communicating rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy, associated with a contralateral corpus luteum.5

Transperitoneal migration is considered to be a contributory factor for ectopic pregnancy. This assertion is based on the fact that the corpus luteum is found to be on the contralateral side in a high proportion (15-20%) of the cases of ectopic pregnancy.7,13,15 Furthermore, the supposed association between infertility and transperitoneal migration has led some authors to suggest that oophorectomy, ipsilateral to the salpingectomy, should be performed in certain cases of tubal pregnancy.13

On the other hand, one case series14 and one meta-analysis5 estimated that the incidence of transperitoneal migration is higher than had been suspected. Considering the relatively low incidence of ectopic pregnancy, these studies concluded that the two conditions were unrelated. However, the conclusions in these studies were not based on data from clinically and radiologically documented intrauterine pregnancies following transperitoneal migration.

To examine the concept that transperitoneal migration may be associated with intrauterine pregnancy, a literature review was conducted. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Lilacs and Scielo were accessed for original articles (Table 1). The initial search strategy included the key words "transperitoneal migration" or "external migration" ("migração transperitoneal" or "migração externa" in Portuguese). The texts and references of the selected articles were used for a final search. We found 11 reports (10 case reports and 1 case series) of intrauterine pregnancies associated with transperitoneal migration (Table 2).6,8,10,12 A systematic review is included in one of these articles.12 Only Motta et al.8 documented more than one intrauterine pregnancy (with two abortions and one that ended at term). We did not find any reports of more than one successful pregnancy that might resemble the present case.

CONCLUSION

The case presented here suggests that transperitoneal migration in humans may be more common than has been presumed. The possibility that an intrauterine pregnancy can follow such migration should be taken into consideration.

Sources of funding: None

Conflict of interest: None

Date of first submission: July 17, 2010

Last received: November 12, 2010

Accepted: January 31, 2011

  • 1. Gordts S, Campo R, Rombauts L, Brosens I. Endoscopic visualization of the process of fimbrial ovum retrieval in the human. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1425-8.
  • 2. Gordts S, Campo R, Brosens I. Endoscopic visualization of oocyte release and oocyte retrieval in humans. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4 Suppl 3:10-3.
  • 3. Chou LL, Huang MC. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy after ipsilateral segmental salpingectomy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(2):203-5.
  • 4. Bush SH, Haidar ZA, Chauhan S. Transperitoneal migration of multiple ova in a didelphic uterus: a case report. W V Med J. 2007;103(3):19-20.
  • 5. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H, McMahon C. Preventing ectopic pregnancies: how often does transperitoneal transmigration of sperm occur in effecting human pregnancy? BJOG. 2004;111(7): 706-14.
  • 6. Ombelet W, Deblaere K, Grieten M, et al. Intrauterine pregnancy following transperitoneal oocyte and/or sperm migration in a woman with an ectopic (undescended) ovary. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(1):110-3.
  • 7. Gabriel B, Fischer DC, Sergius G. Unruptured pregnancy in a non-communicating heterotopic right fallopian tube associated with left unicornuate uterus: evidence for transperitoneal sperm and oocyte migration. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(1):91-2.
  • 8. Motta T, Marchini M, Fadin M, D'Alberton A, Candiani GB. Successive transperitoneal migration of ova in a woman with extensive pelvic adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(6):1311-2.
  • 9. Pokoly TB. Ectopic pregnancy in a noncommunicating tube of a unicornuate uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1989;34(12):994-5.
  • 10. Ben-Nun I, Fejgin M, Gruber A, Ben-Aderet N. Transperitoneal ovum migration in women with unilateral congenital ovarian absence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(7):665-7.
  • 11. Brown C, LaVigne WE, Padilla SL. Unruptured pregnancy in a heterotopic fallopian tube: evidence for transperitoneal sperm migration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156(1):88-90.
  • 12. Wheeler JM, Dodson MG. Transperitoneal migration of the ovum. A case report. J Reprod Med. 1985;30(11):895-8.
  • 13. Kamrava MM, Seibel MM, Thompson IE, Berger MJ, McArdle CR. Intrauterine pregnancy following transperitoneal migration of the ovum. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;60(3):391-3.
  • 14. Saito M, Koyama T, Yaoi Y, Kumasaka T, Yazawa K. Site of ovulation and ectopic pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1975;54(3):227-30.
  • 15. Berlind M. The contralateral corpus luteuman important factor in ectopic pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1960;16:51-2.
  • 16. Doyle JB. Exploratory culdotomy for observation of tubo-ovarian physiology at ovulation time. Fertil Steril. 1951;2(6):475-86.
  • Address for correspondence:

    Adriano Barreto Nogueira
    Rua Dr. Alfredo Valentini, 233
    Centro - Pindamonhangaba (SP) - Brasil
    CEP 12400-360
    Tel. (+55 11) 7144-6463
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      21 Sept 2011
    • Date of issue
      2011

    History

    • Accepted
      31 Jan 2011
    • Reviewed
      12 Nov 2010
    • Received
      17 July 2010
    Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM APM / Publicações Científicas, Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antonio, 278 - 7º and., 01318-901 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 3188-4310 / 3188-4311, Fax: +55 11 3188-4255 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revistas@apm.org.br