SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue1Reproductive performance of female Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) fed diets with different digestible energy levelsUse of Lippia rotundifolia and Cymbopogon flexuosus essential oils, individually or in combination, in broiler diets author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia

On-line version ISSN 1806-9290

R. Bras. Zootec. vol.46 no.1 Viçosa Jan. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017000100002 

Forage Crops

Agronomic evaluation of Paspalum notatum Flügge under the influence of photoperiod

Juliana Medianeira Machado 1   *  

Miguel Dall'Agnol 2  

Eder Alexandre Minski da Motta 3  

Emerson André Pereira 4  

Carine Simioni 2  

Roberto Luis Weiler 2  

Marcos Perera Zuñeda 5  

Priscila Becker Ferreira 6  

1 Universidade de Cruz Alta, Centro de Ciências da Saúde e Agrárias, Cruz Alta, RS, Brazil.

2 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

3 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

4 Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Estudos Agrários, Ijuí, RS, Brazil.

5Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

6 Universidade Federal do Pampa, Departamento de Tecnologia em Aquicultura, Uruguaiana, RS, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of photoperiod on the forage yield by ecotypes and intraspecific hybrids of P. notatum. Tetraploid ecotypes from the United States Department of Agriculture and the National University of the Northeast in Argentina, in addition to six intraspecific hybrids, totaling 19 ecotypes, were assessed. The materials evaluated were subjected to an extended photoperiod (14 h of light) and natural photoperiod from July 2011 to October 2012. The experimental design was a completely randomized factorial scheme of 19 × 2 (ecotypes × photoperiod) consisting of five replicates. The materials were influenced differentially by the variation in photoperiod, with one group showing high sensitivity, whereas another, smaller group, was insensitive to this factor. The use of materials with differentiated responses to photoperiod in different climatic regions can be an important tool to increase forage yield of Paspalum notatum.

Key Words: ecotypes; forage yield; hybrids; subtropical grass

Introduction

The Brazilian livestock is largely raised under extensive systems, with pastures as the main source of feed for these herbivores. Brazil has a rich natural environment, with a diversity of species better adapted to local conditions than exotic species.

The genusPaspalumL. contains more than 400 tropical and subtropical species, whose importance is supported by adaptation to different ecosystems, representing a lower risk of biological imbalance because of existing genetic diversity (Strapasson et al., 2000). From a foraging point of view and given the large number of species present in the Pampa biome, these species are components of almost all South Brazilian grasslands. Among these species,Paspalum notatumFlügge has good forage quality, high resistance to grazing and trampling by animals (Pozzobon and Valls, 1997), and was included in the PROBIO project of the Ministry of Environment (Brasil, 2009), among the so-called plants of the future, because of its potential to be introduced into the agricultural matrix.

However, its production is concentrated in the summer, with a drastic yield decline occurring during the winter. The dormancy induced by reduction of the photoperiod is the most important determining factor that negatively influences seasonal yield, in addition to the low temperatures occurring in this season (Sinclair et al., 2003). Thus, ecotypes or species considered sensitive to photoperiod display a decline in forage yield with the reduction of photoperiod, regardless of temperature.

The existence of intraspecific variability has aroused the interest of studies in selecting materials with higher forage yield and more adapted to different environmental conditions. Thus, crosses between sexual and apomictic ecotypes can be performed to obtain superior characters set by apomixis (Acuña et al. 2009).

To this end, assessments of genitors that have the capacity to convey traits of interest to their progeny are required, in addition to determining the genetic potential of hybrids from these crosses. The realization of agronomic field trials is important to provide a more precise and safe selection of these materials, which facilitates the indication for release as new commercial cultivations. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of photoperiod in the forage yield based on ecotypes and intraspecific hybrids ofP. notatum.

Material and Methods

The experiment was conducted in Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil (latitude 30°1′16.13″ S, longitude 51°13′23.99″ W). The photoperiod at this latitude varies from 10 h on June 21 to 14 h on December 21. The experiment was conducted from July 2011 to October 2012. The climate is classified as humid subtropical (Cfa) according to the Köppen classification (Moreno, 1961). We evaluated apomictic tetraploid ecotypes ofPaspalum notatum Flügge from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), denominated 30N, 36N, 48N, 70N, 83N, 95N, and V4, which were collected in South America, and sexual ecotypes from the National University of the Northeast in Argentina, denominated Q4188, Q4205, and C44X. In addition, we evaluated intraspecific hybrids of P. notatumresulting from crosses between the ecotypes Q4205 × André da Rocha (Progeny "C") and Q4205 × Bagual (Progeny "D"), totaling six superior hybrids selected for production of total dry mass, denominated C1, C2, C15, C17, D3, and D16 (Table 1). The work was performed in this breeding program. The reproduction mode of the sexual genitors was described by Quarin et al. (2001) and the ploidy level of the other ecotypes was analyzed by Fachinetto et al. (2012). Paspalum notatum'Pensacola' and two native ecotypes of Rio Grande do Sul, denominated André da Rocha and Bagual, collected in the 1980s, were used as sources. The apomictic ecotypes have gone through a selection process for production of total dry mass (Fachinetto et al., 2012). Five clones of each ecotype were prepared, placed in 2.8-L pots with a commercial substrate, and placed in an open area where they were subjected to natural and extended photoperiods (14-h light) between July and August 2011 and from March to August 2012. Four 250-W metal halide lamps were placed 1.5 m from the plants in the extended photoperiod treatment. We used a light meter to measure the light intensity received by the plants subjected to the extended photoperiod. As different light intensities were detected, the plants were reallocated every three days. The experimental design was completely randomized in a 19 × 2 (ecotypes × photoperiod) factorial design with extended and natural photoperiod consisting of five replicates. The total dry weight yield of the ecotypes was evaluated by cutting, resulting in twelve cuts during the evaluation period. The cuts were performed when ecotypes and hybrids reached an average height of 15 cm and a 5-cm height residue was maintained. The collected materials were placed to dry in a greenhouse with forced air at 65 °C for 72 h and were subsequently weighed. The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with F test and comparison of means was performed with the Scott-Knott and Tukey tests at 5% significance, using the GENES software (Cruz, 2007). We also performed a Pearson's correlation analysis among seasons.

Table 1 Identification of ecotypes and intraspecific hybrids of Paspalum notatum 

Ecotype Identification Ploidy level
30N 1 Santa Fé - Argentina Tetraploid
36N 1 Santa Fé - Argentina Tetraploid
48N 1 Mercedes - Argentina Tetraploid
70N 1 Cordoba - Argentina Tetraploid
83N 1 Corrientes - Argentina Tetraploid
95N 1 Corrientes - Argentina Tetraploid
V41 Barra do Quarai/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
André da Rocha1 André da Rocha/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
Bagual1 Missões/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
Pensacola1 Viamão/RS - Brazil Diploid
C44x2 Corrientes - Argentina Tetraploid
Q41882 Corrientes - Argentina Tetraploid
Q42052 Corrientes - Argentina Tetraploid
C13 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
C23 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
C153 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
C173 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
D33 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid
D163 Porto Alegre/RS - Brazil Tetraploid

1 Obtained by field collections.

2 Obtained through chromosome duplication in the laboratory.

3 Obtained through intraspecific crosses of Paspalum notatum.

Results and Discussion

There was an interaction between ecotypes × photoperiod (P<0.05) for the productivity of total dry mass (PTDM) (g pot-1), with the formation of distinct groups that demonstrated the existence of genetic variability between the evaluated ecotypes (Tables 2 and 3). The reduction in forage yield ofPaspalum notatumin the winter period characterized it as a long-day species (Newman et al., 2007), which flowers between the months of October and March, and approximately 85% of forage yield occurs during summer (Newman et al., 2011). Thus, the key issue for this type of response is whether an extended photoperiod during the cold months could have a negative impact on subsequent yields of ecotypes and hybrids, while resulting in an increase in forage yield during the cold months. A potential use of the reserve substances stored in the rhizomes could be to promote changes in forage yield during the favorable growth season for the species.

Table 2 Yield of total dry mass of Paspalum notatum ecotypes in different environments and seasons 

Ecotype Year1
Extended photoperiod Natural photoperiod
Winter Spring Winter Spring
30N A1.2ab A11.8def B0.6abcde A9.4cdef
36N A0.7bcd A9.3ef A0.5abcde A7.3ef
48N A0.6bcd A12.0def A0.8abcde A9.9cde
70N A0.9bcd A13.6cdef B0.3bcde B8.1def
83N A0.6bcd A9.0f A0.7abcde A8.5def
95N A0.9bc A11.1def A0.7abcde A11.1bcde
V4 A0.7bcd A12.7cdef B0.3cde A9.4cdef
André da Rocha A1.8a A11.3def A1.0abcd A8.9def
Bagual A1.3ab A12.1cedef A0.7abcd B9.8cde
Pensacola A1.1ab A10.9def B0.2e B3.5f
Q4188 A1.1ab A18.0b A1.1a B9.5cde
Q4205 A0.8bcd A23.1a A1.0ab B9.9cde
C44X A0.7bcd A9.8ef B0.4cde A8.7def
C1 A0.7bcd A13.7bcdef A0.4abcde A18.0ab
C2 A0.3cd B11.1def B0.1e A15.0abc
C15 A0.3cd A16.9bc B0.2e A18.6a
C17 A0.2d A14.9bcd A0.2e B10.4bcde
D3 A0.6bcd B17.7b A1.0abc A19.1a
D16 A0.6bcd A13.9bcde B0.3de A13.3abcd

Means preceded by different uppercase letters in the row differ between seasons within the year by the Scott-Knott test (P<0.05) and means followed by different lowercase letters in the column differ by the Tukey test (P<0.05).

Table 3 Yield of total dry mass of Paspalum notatum ecotypes in different environments and seasons 

Ecotype Year2
Extended photoperiod Natural photoperiod
Summer Autumn Winter Spring Summer Autumn Winter Spring
30N A17.1cde A7.5bcd A5.2bcd A5.5bc A16.8cdef B4.8cde A4.6b A4.1cd
36N A18.2bcde A6.3bcd A4.9bcde A5.5cd A16.2cdef A5.1cde A2.7bc A3.7cde
48N A17.3cde A8.5bc A4.6bcde A4.3cd A18.3bcde A4.8cde A3.3bc A5.0bcd
70N A17.5bcde­­ A9.4b A5.3bcd A5.2cd B12.6defg B3.3e B2.2bc B3.3de
83N A9.5f A4.2cd A4.9bcde A4.8cd A12.1defg A3.4de A1.5c A3.7cde
95N A17.5bcde A9.2b A6.8bcd A6.5bcd A18.5bcde A8.0abc B3.8bc B4.9bcd
V4 A18.8bcde A8.5bc A3.6de A4.6cd A16.1cdef A5.7bcde A2.8bc A4.3bcd
André da Rocha A18.5bcde A9.0b A6.3bcd A5.3cd B10.6efg B2.6e B2.2bc A3.1de
Bagual A19.0bcd A7.9bc A6.8bcd A5.4cd A18.5cde B4.4cde B3.3bc A4.0cde
Pensacola A11.8ef A4.5cd A4.0cde A3.7cd B6.4g B2.7e A1.9bc A2.0e
Q4188 A33.2a A14.0a A7.7ab A10.5ab B22.8bc B8.0abc B3.3bc B5.6bc
Q4205 A24.4b A8.5bc A7.5abc A12.4a B16.3cdef B3.1e B2.6bc B3.9cde
C44X A13.6def A3.1d A1.5e A3.4d A9.3fg A2.6e A1.4c A3.1e
C1 A20.0bcd A9.0b A11.2a A10.54ab A21.7bc A6.2bcde B7.8a B8.0a
C2 B14.2def A7.6bcd A3.9cde A5.3cd A19.3bcd A7.6abc A3.4bc A4.8bcd
C15 A22.6bc A10.7ab A5.2bcd A5.8cd A25.5ab A9.6ab A4.6b A5.7bc
C17 A15.9cdef A9.7ab A4.8bcde A5.5cd A20.1bcd B7.5abcd B2.5bc A5.0bcd
D3 B19.4bc A10.6ab A5.5bcd A6.2cd A32.3a A10.9a B3.6bc B5.1bcd
D16 A16.9cde A7.6bcd A5.9bcd A7.5bc A19.1bcd A8.5abc A4.2bc A6.3ab

Means preceded by different uppercase letters in the row differ between seasons within the year by the Scott-Knott test (P<0.05) and means followed by different lowercase letters in the column differ by the Tukey test (P<0.05).

From the results of the experiment, it was possible to classify the materials evaluated as sensitive or insensitive to photoperiod. Published reports state that the earlier a species expresses its growth potential, the lower its sensitivity to photoperiod will be (Rosa et al., 2009), and consequently the reduction of the vegetative period will be lower (Garner and Allard, 1920).

Regarding the regrowth capacity during the transition from winter to spring, in the first year of evaluation, the ecotypes demonstrated rapid regrowth under both treatments (Table 2). Among the 19 materials tested, 17 showed no differences in PTDM in the transition from winter to spring when subjected to the extended photoperiod. This response did not hamper growth in the subsequent spring season, which was confirmed by the positive correlation between the two seasons (r = 0.73; P = 0.0004). Only the C2 and D3 hybrids had lower PTDM in spring when subjected to the extended photoperiod. The results could indicate that these materials consumed their energy reserves during winter, which may have affected the forage yield in the subsequent season.

The ecotype Q4205 stood out when subjected to extended photoperiod and had the highest numerical PTDM in spring; however, this ecotype was not in the most productive group during the winter season. When subjected to natural photoperiod, there was a rapid regrowth and accumulation of dry mass of hybrids in the spring season, when compared with genitors Q4205 × André da Rocha and Q4205 × Bagual, maximizing the benefits obtained by hybrid vigor (Carvalho et al., 2001). The genetic variability observed in the evaluated materials creates a substantial opportunity to perform new crosses within the breeding program. Thus, the best hybrids with regrowth capacity in spring could be used as male genitors in crosses with female genitors that have high forage yield, which could make it possible to obtain new elite recombinants to use in different environments.

Thus, when hybridization is performed between sexual and apomictic plants, there will be segregation for apomixis and sexuality in the next generation. The apomictic progenies, which present the desired agronomic traits, could be subjected to the final stages of evaluation for later release as new cultivars. On the other hand, sexual plants with superior characteristics could be used in new recombinations within the breeding program (Burton et al., 1973; Jank et al., 2011).

In the second year of assessment, there were variations with respect to regrowth of ecotypes in the transition period between winter and spring (Table 3). The ecotypes Q4188 and Q4205 had higher PTDM in spring, with increases of 1.3- and 1.4-fold, respectively. The other ecotypes, 30N, 36N, V4, C44X, C2, C15, C17, D3, and D16, also had good regrowth capacity; however, the intensity of response was relatively low. On the other hand, the ecotypes 70N and 83N had similar PTDM during this evaluation period. The ecotypes 48N, 95N, André da Rocha, Bagual, C1, and the cultivar Pensacola exhibited decreases in this parameter, displaying slower regrowth after winter.

There was variation in PTDM when the ecotypes were subjected to natural photoperiod. The majority of ecotypes presented the highest yields in spring, with the exception of ecotype 30N, which displayed the opposite behavior. The hybrid C1 and the cultivar Pensacola displayed similar yields in winter and spring.

In the second year of assessment, the productive superiority of hybrids compared with genitors was again apparent, which indicated the expression of their genetic potential after establishment. According to Pereira et al. (2002), in the year of establishment for young plants, only part of the genes responsible for traits of interest may be expressed, whereas in the adult stage, the full potential of the plant is expressed, resulting in changes in the phenotype. The cultivar Pensacola is one of the few alternative seeds of summer-cultured species available for sale in southern Brazil. Therefore, it is important to note that the native ecotypes showed greater development in the beginning of the warm season when compared with the commercial cultivars, pointing to the need to exploit the productive potential of these materials. It is important that the highlighted materials in this study be directed to field trials to check their yield potential, persistence, and adaptation to different climatic conditions, as well as resistance to pathogens and diseases.

When the transition period between summer and autumn was analyzed, the ecotypes André da Rocha, Bagual, and the cultivar Pensacola exhibited pronounced reductions in PTDM of approximately 4.1-, 4.2-, and 2.4-fold, respectively, when subjected to natural photoperiod (Table 3). It should be noted that the tested hybrids exhibited lower or similar reduction in PTDM observed for the cultivar Pensacola, which displayed a lower growth reduction with shorter photoperiod, but had a low-yield potential.

The availability of variability in response to photoperiod is extremely important in any breeding program for forage species. This characteristic can provide a reduction in the forage deficit present in the southern region of Brazil caused by the transition period between the seasons.

There was no variation in the PTDM of ecotypes 36N, 48N, and 83N during all seasons, regardless of the photoperiod and year of assessment (Tables 2 and 3). This information suggests a greater stability of these ecotypes compared with the others and they can be classified as insensitive to photoperiod reduction, maintaining a stable yield throughout the seasons. This feature could assist in the selection process of ecotypes with greater seasonal distribution of forage yield, depending on the region in which they will be used. The results of PTDM do not serve as indicators of the behavior of the forage yield throughout the seasons and, consequently, PTDM cannot be used as the sole factor of choice of species or cultivar to be adopted.

Some of the factors that affect the physiology of forage plants are climatic factors, such as photoperiod and temperature (Whiteman, 1980). The identification of materials described as insensitive is important, as these could be used in regions with milder weather, where the decrease in yield occurs mainly because of the photoperiod in the winter season. The results obtained suggested that the male genitors could be used in schemes of intraspecific crosses with female genitor ecotypes with sexual reproduction and high forage yield during the seasons that favor their growth.

Thus, although the ecotypes Q4188 and Q4205 presented intermediate PTDM in the summer season when subjected to natural photoperiod, the fact that they presented a sexual reproduction mode makes them eligible as female genitors for crosses with the ecotypes 36N, 48N, and 83N. Hence, the progenies of the ecotype Q4188 could be used in environments with mild winters. On the other hand, within the possibilities of sexual materials available in the breeding program, the ecotype Q4205 could be used in crosses for environments with colder winters. It is also worth noting that the presence of responsive materials is important for areas with colder climates, because this mechanism probably acts as a defense mechanism against an unfavorable season for its development.

Sinclair et al. (2001) pointed out that the selection of photoperiod-insensitive ecotypes could substantially increase forage yield in subtropical regions. The limited forage availability during the months with shorter day length has been one of the most important factors influencing animal production and the pasture management (Sinclair et al. 2003), although it cannot be used as a single parameter responsible for the low-forage yield during this period. Newman et al. (2007), in a study conducted in Florida with the genera Paspalum, PanicumandCynodon, observed average yields of total dry mass 3.5 times higher with extended photoperiod when compared with the normal photoperiod that occurs during the winter.

Further studies with the goal of obtaining new crosses between elite recombinants may contribute to the achievement of progenies adapted to different climatic conditions, in which the photoperiod has an extreme influence on forage yield. Thus, the quest for sexual materials that are the source of variability in apomictic species is of utmost importance, because it can fix this characteristic within the breeding program and will contribute to a better distribution of forage throughout the year, reducing the forage deficit that occurs in subtropical regions.

Conclusions

The materials were influenced differentially by the variation in the photoperiod, with one group with great sensitivity, whereas a smaller group exhibited insensitivity to this factor. The use of materials with different responses to photoperiod in different climatic regions can be an important tool for increasing the forage yield ofPaspalum notatum.

References

Acuña, C. A.; Blount, A. R.; Quesenberry, K. H.; Kenworthy, K. E. and Hanna, W. W. 2009. Bahiagrass tetraploid germplasm: reproductive and agronomic characterization of segregating progeny. Crop Science 49:581-588. [ Links ]

Brasil. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2009. Projeto plantas para o futuro. Available at: <Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br >. Accessed on: Apr. 10, 2013. [ Links ]

Burton, G. W.; Millot, J. C. and Monson, W. G. 1973. Breeding procedures for Panicum maximum Jacq. suggested by plant variability and mode of reproduction. Crop Science 13:717-720. [ Links ]

Carvalho, F. I. F.; Silva, S. A.; Kurek, A. J. and Marchioro, V. S. 2001. Estimativas e implicações da herdabilidade como estratégia de seleção. UFPel, Pelotas. [ Links ]

Cruz, C. D. 2007. Programa Genes: aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. UFV, Viçosa, MG. [ Links ]

Fachinetto, J. M.; Schneider, R.; Hubber, K. G. C. and Dall'Agnol, M. 2012. Avaliação agronômica e análise da persistência em uma coleção de acessos de Paspalum notatum Flügge (Poaceae). Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 7:189-195. [ Links ]

Garner, W. W. and Allard, H. A. 1920. Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Journal of Agricultural Research 18:553-606. [ Links ]

Jank, L.; Valle, C. B. and Resende, R. M. S. 2011. Breeding tropical forages. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 11:27-34. [ Links ]

Moreno, J. A. 1961. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Secretaria da Agricultura, Porto Alegre. [ Links ]

Newman, Y. C.; Sinclair, T. R.; Blount, A. S.; Lugo, M. L. and Valencia, E. 2007. Forage production of tropical grasses under extended day length at subtropical and tropical latitudes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 61:18-24. [ Links ]

Newman, Y. C.; Vendramini, J. and Blount, A. 2011. Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum): Overview and management. Fact Sheet SS-AGR-332. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Available at: <Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag342 >. Accessed on: Aug. 15, 2015. [ Links ]

Pereira, A. V.; Cruz, C. D.; Ferreira, R. P.; Botrel, M. A. and Oliveira, J. S. 2002. Influência da estabilização de genótipos de capim-elefante (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) sobre a estimativa da repetibilidade de características forrageiras. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 26:762-767. [ Links ]

Pozzobon, M. T. and Valls, J. M. 1997. Chromosome number in germplasm accessions of Paspalum notatum (Gramineae). Brazilian Journal of Genetic 20:29-34. [ Links ]

Quarin, C. L.; Espinoza, F.; Martinez, E. J.; Pessino, S. C. and Bovo, O. A. 2001. A rise of ploidy level induces the expression of apomixis in Paspalum notatum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 13:243-249. [ Links ]

Rosa, H. T.; Walter, L. C.; Streck, N. A. and Alberto, C. M. 2009. Métodos de soma térmica e datas de semeadura na determinação de filocrono de cultivares de trigo. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44:1374-1382. [ Links ]

Sinclair, T. R.; Mislevy, P. and Ray, J. D. 2001. Short photoperiod inhibits winter growth of subtropical grasses. Plant 213:488-491. [ Links ]

Sinclair, T. R.; Ray, J. D.; Mislevy, P. and Premazzi, M. 2003. Growth of subtropical forage grasses under extended photoperiod during short-day length months. Crop Science 43:618-623. [ Links ]

Strapasson, E.; Vencovsky, R. and Batista, L. A. R. 2000. Seleção de descritores na caracterização de germoplasma de Paspalum sp. por meio de componentes principais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 29:373-381. [ Links ]

Whiteman, P. C. 1980. Tropical pasture science. Oxford University Press, New York. [ Links ]

1How to cite: Machado, J. M.; Dall'Agnol, M.; Motta, E. A. M.; Pereira, E. A.; Simioni, C.; Weiler, R. L.; Zuñeda, M. P. and Ferreira, P. B. 2017. Agronomic evaluation of Paspalum notatum Flügge under the influence of photoperiod. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 46(1):8-12.

Received: May 23, 2016; Accepted: August 21, 2016

*Corresponding author: julianam.machado@yahoo.com.br

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License