versión impresa ISSN 1516-4446
Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. v.28 n.3 São Paulo sep. 2006
Causa mortis em usuários de crack
Marcelo RibeiroI; John DunnII; Ricardo SessoIII; Andréa Costa DiasI; Ronaldo LaranjeiraI
IUnidade de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (UNIAD), Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil
IINorth Camden Drug Service, Camden & Islington Mental Health & Social Care Trust, London, UK
IIIGrupo Interdepartamental de Epidemiologia Clínica (GRIDEC), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil
OBJECTIVE: The study accompanied 131 crack-cocaine users over a 5-year period, and examined mortality patterns, as well as the causes of death among them.
METHOD: All patients admitted to a detoxification unit in Sao Paulo between 1992 and 1994 were interviewed during two follow-up periods: 1995-1996 and 1998-1999.
RESULTS: After 5 years, 124 patients were localized (95%). By the study endpoint (1999), 23 patients (17.6%) had died. Homicide was the most prevalent cause of death (n = 13). Almost one third of the deaths were due to the HIV infection, especially among those with a history of intravenous drug use. Less than 10% died from overdose.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the mortality risk among crack cocaine users is greater than that seen in the general population, being homicide and AIDS the most common causes of death among such individuals.
Keywords: Crack cocaine; Longitudinal studies; Mortality rate; Cause of death; Substance related disorders
OBJETIVO: O estudo acompanhou, por cinco anos, um grupo de 131 usuários de crack e observou os padrões de mortalidade, bem como as causas mortis entre esses.
MÉTODO: Todos os pacientes que se internaram em um serviço de desintoxicação, localizado no município de São Paulo, entre 1992-1994 foram entrevistados em duas ocasiões: 1995-1996 e 1998-1999.
RESULTADOS: Após cinco anos, 124 pacientes foram localizados (95%). Vinte e três pacientes (17,6%) haviam morrido ao final do quinto ano de seguimento, sendo os homicídios a causa mortis mais prevalente (n = 13). Quase um terço dos pacientes morreu devido à infecção pelo vírus da imunodeficiência adquirida (HIV), especialmente aqueles com antecedentes pessoais de uso de drogas endovenosas. Menos de 10% dos pacientes morreu de overdose.
CONCLUSÕES: O estudo sugere que os usuários de crack têm maior risco de morte do que a população geral, sendo os homicídios e a AIDS as causas mais observadas.
Descritores: Cocaína crack; Estudos longitudinais; Coeficiente de mortalidade; Causa da morte; Transtornos relacionados ao uso de substâncias
Substance misuse has always been associated with risk of mortality among their users.1 Adittionally, patterns of drug use have undergone considerable modification in the last 30 years. Such modifications include the dissemination of heroin injection in Europe and USA, as well as the advent of synthetic drugs (designer drugs) and crack cocaine throughout the Western world.2-3 Such changes have altered the composition of mortality profiles related to drug use, especially among adolescents and young adults.4-6 In this population, there has been a reduction in the proportion of deaths from natural causes (cardiopathy, neoplasia, and infectious diseases - excluding STDs and AIDS), at the expense of an increased rate of deaths from external causes (overdoses, accidents, suicides, and homicides).5-6
As a member of this "new generation" of psychoactive substances, crack cocaine has caught the attention of health authorities, especially in the Americas and in Europe.3,7 Despite affecting a minority of the population.3,7-9 the profile of young crack users, the acute effects of the drug, and the violence of the illegal market have transformed crack into an extremely important public health issue.3
Crack first appeared in Brazil in the late 1980s.10-11 and crack use began to increase rapidly in the following years due to the lower price and more intense effects of the drug.12 Injection drug users (IDUs), motivated by the fear of AIDS, also altered the route of administration from injection to crack smoking.13 Sociodemographic profiles show this group of users is primarily comprised of single, unemployed males aging 15 to 30 years and presenting low levels of education and income.11-14 Homeless young males are especially affected by crack use, and rates of recent crack abuse range from 15 to 26% among such users.15 In addition, crack users tend to engage in risky sexual activities and drug dealing more frequently than do inhaled cocaine users.16-17
Very little is known of the natural history of crack use. In most of the longitudinal studies conducted, researchers have typically been more interested in investigating treatment outcomes.18-21 Data regarding crack-related mortality and its causes are even more imprecise despite the fact that crack use is a recent phenomenon and is influenced by innumerable variables. In view of this, Laranjeira et al. carried out a 2-year follow-up study from October 1995 to December 1996 comprising 131 crack user patients who had been hospitalised in São Paulo from 1992 to 1994.22 The authors reported a very high annual mortality rate, most of the deaths being caused by AIDS or homicide.
These findings motivated us to continue monitoring these patients, extending the follow-up period to a total of 5 years. A survival analysis of this sample has been previously published,23 and the present study focuses more on providing additional information on mortality rates and the causes of death, comparing the data obtained to those related to users of other substances, as well as compiling evidence from the literature on the subject.
Subjects were selected from among the patients admitted to the Alcohol and Drugs Detoxification Unit of the Hospital Geral de Taipas (HGT, General Hospital of Taipas) from May 26, 1992 (the unit's first operating day) up to December 31, 1994. Those meeting the criteria established by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) for crack dependence were included in the study. In total, 131 patients were admitted to the clinic during this period. Diagnosis was established through a clinical interview with the psychiatrists responsible for hospitalisations.
2. General Hospital of Taipas
The HGT is located in a suburban neighbourhood in the northern part of the city of São Paulo. The Alcohol and Drugs Detoxification Unit is a multidisciplinary facility, which receives patients from all over the city and specialises in the detoxification of chemical dependents. At the time of this study, it was the only public clinic of its type in the city. The detoxification programme lasts for two weeks and is followed by outpatient care.
Data collection was carried out through a structured interview and through the review of medical files. The interviews were used in order to gather information on the evolution of participants after being discharged from the HGT and included questions regarding topics such as their present pattern of crack use, employment status, legal problems, and search for treatment. The review of patient files was aimed at the compilation of the patients' demographic data at the time of their hospitalisation. Both procedures were carried out by the first author (MR) and by the assistant occupational therapist of the HGT Detoxification Clinic, who had been specifically trained for this purpose.
The first follow-up evaluation period was from 1995 to 1996 on average, 2 years after the initial admission.22 Interviews were carried out over the phone if possible. When that was not possible, a registered letter was sent to the last known address of the patient in question. If no response was received, a second registered letter was sent. Finally, records obtained from the municipal Programa de Aprimoramento das Informações de Mortalidade (PRO-AIM, Programme for the Improvement of Mortality Data) were reviewed in order to confirm the deaths of subjects as reported by their families, as well as to determine their causes of death.
The second follow-up study was carried out from 1998 to 1999. The same procedures were used, together with additional strategies for locating subjects. During the first follow-up period, 13 patients died. Therefore, their families were not contacted again. Initially, 51 patients were interviewed over the phone, and registered letters located three others. Those who did not respond to the second registered letter were visited at their homes. In this way, we succeeded in interviewing 17 patients and updating the phone numbers of another 31. Using the Internet telephone directory for the city of São Paulo, five additional patients (or their parents) were located. By the end of this process, 11 patients remained unaccounted for. A tracking search was then carried out, involving the Centre for Psychiatric Hospitalisation Openings of the State of São Paulo Health Department (no patients located), PRO-AIM (no patients located), and the Secretary of Penitentiary Administration (4 patients located). Such additional strategies helped decrease the number of patients unaccounted for from 28 (in the 1995-1996 period) to 7 (in the 1998-1999 period).
4. Statistical analysis
A descriptive analysis summarised the profile of the patients under study. The overall mortality rate was obtained by dividing the number of deaths by the total number of individuals in the sample. Mean annual mortality was calculated by dividing the overall mortality rate by the number of years of follow-up study. The mortality rate adjusted for gender and age was obtained by means of the direct method, using the population of the city of São Paulo in 1996 (the mean of the study period) as the standard. Gender and age distribution in the population of São Paulo, and the predicted mortality rates in the area were obtained from SEADE Foundation data. The excess mortality rate was calculated by determining the difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates. The standardised mortality ratio was defined as the ratio between the observed mortality rate and the predicted mortality rate.
The follow-up study was approved by the local research ethics committee of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) - CEP 832/99.
1. Sociodemographic profile
From May 1992 to December 1994, 131 crack users were hospitalised in the HGT. A total of 65 patients (50%) resided in the northern area of the city, primarily in the immediate vicinity of the HGT, whereas 20 (15.3%) resided in the eastern part of the city, 16 (12.2%) in the western part, 15 (11.5%) in the southern part, and 7 (5.3%) in the central part. There were 7 (5.3%) who lived in the outskirts of the city and 1 (0.8%) who lived in the surrounding countryside (in the city of São Roque). Among those living in the city of São Paulo, 13 (11%) resided in neighbourhoods presenting the best socioeconomic and environmental conditions, whereas 110 (89%) resided in neighbourhoods considered intermediate or poor in terms of socioeconomic conditions and overcrowding.24
The majority of the sample was composed of single Caucasian males, with low education level. Most were unemployed or were school dropouts. The mean age was 23.6 years (± 6.7 years), and 86 (66%) of the patients aged below 25 years. A total of 61 patients had had some sort of legal problems, and 26 had been arrested at least once. Table 1 shows the demographic data for the study sample.
A total of 23 patients (17.6%) died between discharge and the beginning of the second follow-up period. Mean age at death was 27.1 years (SD = 6.60 years; range, 18-40 years). Approximately 48% of the patients who died did so before the age of 25. Table 2 shows the mortality profile.
Overall annual mortality in the study sample was 35.1 deaths per 1,000 individuals. Annual mortality adjusted for age and gender (direct method), using the population in the city of São Paulo as a standard, was 24.9 deaths per 1000 individuals. The predicted mortality rate for the population of the city of São Paulo was 3.3 deaths per 1000 inhabitants in 1996, which was the midpoint of the study period. Therefore, the excess mortality rate was 21.6 deaths per 1,000 individuals, and the standardised mortality ratio, in relation to that predicted for the city of São Paulo, was 7.6.
3. Causes of death
Table 3 provides data regarding the causes of death. External causes were responsible for 16 (69.6%) of the 23 deaths that occurred. There were 2 patients who died from overdose (8.7%) and 1 who drowned (4.3%). Of the 23 deaths, 13 were attributed to homicide. Based on the cause of death categories established in the ICD-9/ICD-10 and provided by PRO-AIM, 10 patients (43.5%) died from gunshot wounds, and 3 (13.0%) died from wounds inflicted by other weapons. According to reports given by the patients' families, the murders were related to disputes between gangs, debts owed to drug dealers, and confrontations with the police.
There were 7 patients (30.4%) who died of natural causes, 6 (26.1%) who died from AIDS, and 1 (4.3%) who died from hepatitis B infection.
Consequently, the incidence of mortality due to external causes was high, and violent death predominated (56.6% of the deaths reported). Of the 23 deaths, 6 (26.1%) were attributed to AIDS, whereas mortality exclusively due to cocaine pharmacology was responsible for only 2 (8.7%) of the deaths reported among the crack users evaluated in this study.
Mortality among crack users hospitalised in the HGT (1992-1994) was high, more than seven-fold of that seen among the general population of the city of São Paulo for the same period. Most of the patients who died were single males below the age of 30. The studied subjects originated mostly in poor and socially excluded neighbourhoods (89%). However, social class, gender, and age were not associated with reduction in the survival chance among those patients.23 Besides not allowing comparisons, due to the need of previous demographic adjustments, the worst mortality rates observed in the poor areas of Sao Paulo City did not exceed 9 deaths per 1000 inhabitants,24-25 suggesting that poverty is not the only responsible for the high rate of death observed by the present study. Probably several risk factors are working together, but could not be entirely caught by this study's design. Some of them are discussed separately, considering all observed causes of death.
In the present study, only 2 patients (8.7%) died of overdose. Although non-fatal overdose is common,26 indirect evidence found in the literature has shown that crack cocaine has a low lethal potential, especially when compared to drugs such as opiates.18 Epidemiologic surveys of overdose cases carried out in various countries27-31 have demonstrated that mortality rates attributed exclusively to cocaine ranged from 2% to 7%. In addition, cocaine overdose seems to be more common among individuals suffering from cardiovascular problems32 and among those who combine its use with that of other substances, whether through intravenous injection33 or through other routes of administration.34
In contrast, according to the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA),2 the available statistics on the number of cocaine-related deaths are likely to contain inaccuracies. First, there are methodological differences in the way data are collected in the various countries. Second, post-mortem tests to detect the presence of cocaine are rarely performed if heroin is first detected. Finally, the presence of and the role played by cocaine in "natural" causes of death, especially cardiovascular diseases, can go uninvestigated in the forensic evaluation.
In the present study, AIDS was responsible for one-fourth of the deaths occurring among the crack users evaluated. This prevalence probably reflects the phenomenon of the shift to different routes of administration that occurred after the appearance of HIV,13 since only those who had reported intravenous drug use have died of AIDS. In addition, the HGT hospitalisation period (1992-1994) coincided with the arrival of crack and the expansion of its use in the city of São Paulo.10-12
According to data from the previously published follow-up study conducted by Ribeiro et al., intravenous drug use prior to hospitalisation is clearly correlated to reduced survival among crack users.23 The authors found 5-year survival among crack users with a history of injection drug use to be 63%, compared to 86% among crack users with no such history (p = 0.004). In addition, the mortality risk was 3.5-times higher than that seen among those who never have used injection drugs. These findings are in agreement with those of other follow-up studies of injection drug users: Frischer et al. conducted a 14-year study involving 459 injection drug users treated at an outpatient facility in Scotland.35 At the end of the follow-up period, the survival rate for HIV-positive injection drug users was less than 50%, whereas it was approximately 90% for those who were HIV negative.
Due to the sexual behaviour of crack users, crack use has also been directly correlated to HIV infection.16-17 The most frequent risk behaviours in this population are having a high number of sexual partners and engaging in unprotected sex, usually motivated by the need to acquire the substance.36-37 In the present study, we did not investigate such risky behaviour. Therefore, prior use of intravenous drugs was considered the main cause for HIV infection among these users. In future follow-up studies of the same patients, sexual behaviour will be investigated in detail.
More than half of the deaths (56.6%) among crack users in the present study were homicides, and gun-related deaths predominated. Two cross-sectional studies obtained similar results: Budd evaluated the first 114 deaths testing positive for plasma levels of cocaine in the city of Los Angeles in 1988.38 The author reported that, of the 50 individuals (43.8%) who were homicide victims, 32 (26.3%) were killed with a firearm, 18 (15.8%) were killed with another type of weapon, and 2 (1.7%) were strangled. In another cross-sectional study, Marzuk et al. compiled all the deaths due to external causes in New York City from 1990 to 1992, evaluating a total of 14,843 deaths.39 Cocaine was detected in 26% of the deaths. One-third of those were due to intoxication (cocaine alone or in combination with other drugs), whereas the other two-thirds were attributed to homicides, suicides or accidents. Despite the high rates of mortality due to violent deaths, we should highlight the fact that the methodology used in both studies presented relevant limitations. For example, it is not possible to detect the chronic use of the substance in abstinent individuals dying from cardiopathies, AIDS, etc. Neither is it possible to determine the impact or actual contribution of cocaine to any given death. The proportion of deaths due to external causes might therefore have been overestimated.
Most follow-up studies that have examined mortality among drug users have involved heroin users,18,35,40-51 subjects using a broad range of substances,52-55 or individuals being treated with prescription drugs.56-57 In all of those studies, the highest mortality rate due to homicide found was 5% of the deaths reported. Even in those studies in which homicides, suicides, and fatal accidents were combined under the headings of "violent deaths" or "other external causes", such mortality did not exceed 20% of the deaths reported.18,35,40,51 Only the study by Goldstein et al. showed a higher rate of mortality due to homicide: 17% of the deaths among heroin users in their sample.43 However, their sample was exclusively composed of young Hispanic males residing in the state of New Mexico and involved with drug dealing.
Although the results of the present follow-up study do not allow assumptions to be made regarding the etiology and significance of the high prevalence of homicide among its drug user sample, the findings of the other studies presented below could be of great value to establish a basis for future investigations.
According to the World Health Organization, homicide rates among young males from 10 to 30 years of age significantly increased from 1985 to 1994. Although this was a worldwide increase, it was more accentuated in large urban centres in developing countries.58 Such homicides appear to be directly related to socioeconomic factors (poverty and social exclusion),58-60 to gang battling for drug market control,61 as well as to the facilitated access to firearms observed in countries such as the USA and Brazil.62
The illicit crack market seemed to have played an important role in this scenario. Its appearance and expansion in the mid 1980s in the USA63 and in the early 1990s in Brazil12 has been considered by various authors to be a significant cause of homicide among the young.61,64-66 Goldstein et al. studied a sample of 218 police reports of homicides from four police districts in New York and stated that 162 (74%) of those homicides were caused by territorial disputes among drug-dealing gangs, 31 (14%) were related to the psychological effects of crack, and 8 (4%) were due to misdemeanours committed because of drug use (more than one cause was present in 8% of the cases).65 In the USA, the knowledge that crack use fomented violence caused the crack market to retract in the early 1990s. This was followed by a significant decrease in the number of homicides among the population initially targeted.61,67
In Brazil, the incidence of homicides began to increase in the mid 1970s,68 and the rate of increase accelerated in the 1980s.69 Currently, homicide is responsible for more than one-third of all deaths due to external causes.70 Such increases have been confirmed in the main Brazilian capitals.68-69,71-72 In the city of São Paulo, there has been an increase of approximately 400% during the last 30 years.73-75
In agreement with the global trend, homicide victims in Brazilian states are predominantly males from 15 to 35 years,76 and homicide rates seem to be directly related to socioeconomic indicators.77-84 Therefore, homicides were more prevalent in marginalised, socially excluded suburban neighbourhoods. Likewise, Dunn et al. found that theft, as well as armed robbery, were higher among individuals treated in public clinics than among those treated in private clinics.85
Gunshot has been shown to be the most prevalent form of homicide in all Brazilian capitals.68-69,86 According to Peres & Santos, firearms were responsible for more than 50% of homicides in the 1990s and for approximately 70% in 2000 (an increase of 72% in this decade).87 In some areas of the city of São Paulo, firearms are responsible for up to 90% of homicides.73
Finally, underserved neighbourhoods in large Brazilian urban centres are traditionally exploited by drug trafficking, which interferes with their function in various ways. Beato-Filho et al. mapped the incidence of homicides in the city of Belo Horizonte from 1995 to 1999.88 The authors reported that the highest indices were found in neighbourhoods and slums where drug trafficking was present. Santos et al. used a similar methodology in order to study homicide distribution in the city of Porto Alegre.80 The authors found that areas with higher homicide rates were distinguished from others by their high population density and poor socioeconomic conditions, containing the largest slums in the city, which are commanded by drug gangs that battle each other for control of the illicit drug markets in those places. Similar panoramas have been described in other Brazilian capitals.71,73,77-78,83
In such contexts, violence appears to be the principal means of solving market disputes, establishing and enforcing rules regarding the way members in those communities interact, and protecting gang members from other drug dealers or from police interventions.89 Homicide, therefore, achieves the status of law as a means of dealing with informers, deadbeat customers, and drug dealing competition.90-91 Regarding the causes of homicides within these environments, data are scarce and controversial, indicating that the main motivations are matters related to drug trafficking, such as disputes between gangs for the illegal drug market, unpaid debts, and confrontations with the police.75-76
As previously mentioned, the present study provides no evidence for conclusions regarding whether the profile of the sample or the outcomes observed are causes or effects of the previously mentioned panoramas related to the transition from one route of administration to another and to the homicides. However, the determination of causal relationships is extremely important for the development of effective interventions for these patients. Everything seems to indicate that these interventions should be carried out not only at the individual and interpersonal level but also at the community and social level. In addition, such interventions should be organised within and coordinated with a public policy strategy aimed at promoting health and social inclusion.
4. Future investigations
In order to better understand these potential relationships, a 10-year follow-up study is in its initial phase (the instruments are being pre-applied in a pilot study). In order to improve the quality of the data collected, patients will be directly interviewed. Family members will be interviewed only in the case of incarcerated or deceased patients. In either case, sociodemographic data and drug use histories will be examined in detail in order to identify prognostic indicators. Besides amplifying and improving the structured interview to be used in the second follow-up study, a qualitative study will be used to investigate the dynamics of drug use and abstinence, taking into consideration drug use, and, more importantly, the influence of cultural, social and economic aspects.
5. Limitations of the study
The present study comprised a group of crack users in only one clinic. Therefore, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population of drug users. However, the verification of data, achieved through cross-checking patient records against those of PRO-AIM, guaranteed the reliability of the information regarding the causes of death. Finally, sample loss, an important limiting factor of longitudinal studies, was minimal (5.3%; n = 7) and did not compromise the validity of the findings.
We are grateful to Silvana Julião, an assistant occupational therapist at the HGT, for her assistance in the collection of data.
1. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270(18):2207-12. [ Links ]
2. [No authors listed] Observatório Europeu da Droga e da Toxicodependência (OEDT). A evolução do fenômeno da droga na União Européia e na Noruega. Luxemburgo: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drugs Addiction (EMCDDA); 2004. [ Links ]
3. UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World Drug Report 2005. Geneve: UNO; 2005. [ Links ]
4. Ghodse H, Oyefeso A, Kilpatrick B. Mortality of drug addictics in the United Kingdom 1967-1993. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):473-8. [ Links ]
5. Oyefeso A, Ghodse H, Clancy C, Corkery J, Goldfinch R. Drug abuse-related mortality: a study of teenage addicts over a 20-year period. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34(8):437-41. [ Links ]
6. Smith T. The changing pattern of mortality in young adults aged 15 to 34 in Scotland between 1972 and 1992. Scott Med J. 1994;39(5):144-5. [ Links ]
7. Prinzleve M, Haasen C, Zurhold H, Matali JL, Bruguera E, Gerevich J, Bacskai E, Ryder N, Butler S, Manning V, Gossop M, Pezous AM, Verster A, Camposeragna A, Andersson P, Olsson B, Primorac A, Fischer G, Guttinger F, Rehm J, Krausz M. Cocaine use in Europe - a multi-centre study: patterns of use in different groups. Eur Addict Res. 2004;10(4):147-55. [ Links ]
8. Carlini EA, Galduroz JC, Noto AR, Nappo SA. I levantamento domiciliar sobre o uso de drogas psicotrópicas no Brasil. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (CEBRID / SENAD); 2002. [ Links ]
9. Galduroz JC, Noto AR, Fonseca AM, Carlini EA. V Levantamento nacional sobre o consumo de drogas entre estudantes do ensino fundamental e médio da rede pública de ensino nas 27 capitais brasileiras 2004. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (CEBRID / SENAD); 2005. [ Links ]
10. Dunn J, Laranjeira RR, Silveira DX, Formigoni MLOS, Ferri CP. Crack cocaine: an increase in use among patients attending clinics in São Paulo: 1990-1993. Subst Use Misuse. 1996;31(4):519-27. [ Links ]
11. Ferri CP. Cocaína: padrões de consumo e fatores associados à procura de tratamento [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina; 1999. [ Links ]
12. Nappo SA, Galduroz JC, Raymundo M, Carlini EA. Changes in cocaine use as viewed by key informants: a qualitative study carried out in 1994 and 1999 in São Paulo, Brazil. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2001;33(3):241-53. [ Links ]
13. Dunn J, Laranjeira RR. Transitions in the route of cocaine administration - characteristics, direction and associated variables. Addiction. 1999;94(6):813-24. [ Links ]
14. Dunn J, Laranjeira R. Cocaine - profiles, drug histories, and patterns of use of patients from Brazil. Substance Use Misuse. 1999;34(11):1527-48. [ Links ]
15. Noto AR, Galduroz JC, Nappo AS, Fonseca AM, Carlini CM, Moura YG, Carlini EA. Levantamento nacional sobre uso de drogas entre crianças e adolescentes em situação de rua nas 27 capitais brasileiras - 2003. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (CEBRID / SENAD); 2004. [ Links ]
16. Hatsukami DK, Fischman MW. Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride. Are the differences myth or reality? JAMA. 1996;276(19):1580-8. [ Links ]
17. Nappo SA, Sanchez ZM, Oliveira LG, Santos SA, Coradete-Junior J, Pacca JC, Lacks V Comportamento de risco de mulheres usuárias de crack em relação à DST/AIDS. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo (CEBRID UNIFESP); 2004. [ Links ]
18. Gossop M, Stewart D, Treacy S, Marsden J. A prospective study of mortality among drug misusers during a 4-year period after seeking treatment. Addiction. 2002;97(1):39-47. [ Links ]
19. Siegal HA, Li L, Rapp RC. Abstinence trajectories among treated crack cocaine users. Addict Behav. 2002;27(3):437-49. [ Links ]
20. Simpson DD, Joe GW, Broome KM. A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59(6):538-44. [ Links ]
21. McKay JR, Foltz C, Stephens RC, Leahy PJ, Crowley EM, Kissin W. Predictors of alcohol and crack cocaine use outcomes over a 3-year follow-up in treatment seekers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005;28(Suppl 1):S73-82. [ Links ]
22. Laranjeira R, Dunn J, Rassi R, Fernandes M, Mitsushiro S. Crack cocaine - a two-year follow-up study of treated patients. J Addict Dis. 2001;20(1):43-8. [ Links ]
23. Ribeiro M, Dunn J, Laranjeira R, Sesso R. High mortality among young crack cocaine users in Brazil: a 5-year follow-up study. Addiction. 2004;99(9):1133-5. [ Links ]
24. Akerman M, Campanario P, Maia PB. Saúde e meio ambiente: análise de diferenciais intra-urbanos, Município de São Paulo, Brasil. Rev Saude de Publica. 1996;30(4):372-82. [ Links ]
26. Mesquita F, Kral A, Reingold A, Haddad I, Sanches M, Turienzo G, Piconez D, Araujo P, Bueno R. Overdoses among cocaine users in Brazil. Addiction. 2001;96(12):1809-13. [ Links ]
27. Sanchez J, Rodriguez B, de la Fuente L, Barrio G, Vicente J, Roca J, Royuela L. Opiates or cocaine: mortality from acute reactions in six major Spanish cities. State Information System on Drug Abuse (SEIT) Working Group. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49(1):54-60. [ Links ]
28. Torralba L, Brugal MT, Villalbi JR, Tortosa MT, Toribio A, Valverde JL. Mortality due to acute adverse drug reactions: opiates and cocaine in Barcelona, 1989-93. Addiction. 1996;91(3):419-26. [ Links ]
29. Office of National Statistics, United Kingdom (ONS). Deaths related to drug poisoning: results for England and Wales, 1993 to 2000. Health Stat Q. 2002;13:76-82. [ Links ]
30. Degenhardt L, Roxburgh A, Barker B. Underlying causes of cocaine, amphetamine and opioid related deaths in Australia. J Clin Forensic Med. 2005;12(4):187-95. [ Links ]
31. Darke S, Kaye S, Duflou J. Cocaine-related fatalities in New South Wales, Australia 19932002. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77(2):107-14. [ Links ]
32. Karch SB, Stephens B, Ho CH. Relating cocaine blood concentrations to toxicity an autopsy study of 99 cases. J Forensic Sci. 1998;43(1):41-5. [ Links ]
33. Coffin PO, Galea S, Ahern J, Leon AC, Vlahov D, Tardiff K. Opiates, cocaine and alcohol combinations in accidental drug overdose deaths in New York City, 199098. Addiction. 2003;98(6):739-47. [ Links ]
34. O'Driscoll PT, McGough J, Hagan H, Thiede H, Critchlow C, Alexander ER. Predictors of accidental fatal drug overdose among a cohort of injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):984-7. [ Links ]
35. Frischer M, Goldberg D, Rahman M, Berney L. Mortality and survival among a cohort of drug injectors in Glasgow, 1982-1994. Addiction. 1997;92(4):419-27. [ Links ]
36. Booth RE, Watters JK, Chitwood DD. HIV risk-related sex behaviors among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(8):1144-8. [ Links ]
37. Maranda MJ, Han C, Rainone GA. Crack cocaine and sex. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2004;36(3):315-22. [ Links ]
38. Budd RD. Cocaine abuse and violent death. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1989;15(4):375-82. [ Links ]
39. Marzuk PM, Tardiff K, Leon AC, Hirsch CS, Stajic M, Portera L, Hartwell N, Iqbal MI. Fatal injuries after cocaine use as a leading cause of death among young adults in New York City. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(26):1753-7. [ Links ]
40. Hser YI, Hoffman V, Grella CE, Anglin MD. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(5):503-8. [ Links ]
41. Wille R. Ten-year follow-up of a representative sample of London heroin addicts: clinic attendance, abstinence and mortality. Br J Addict. 1981;76(3):259-66. [ Links ]
42. Oppenheimer E, Tobutt C, Taylor C, Andrew T. Death and survival in a cohort of heroin addicts from London clinics: a 22-year follow-up study. Addiction. 1994;89(10):1299-308. [ Links ]
43. Goldstein A, Herrera J. Heroin addicts and methadone treatment in Albuquerque: a 22-year follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;40(2):139-50. [ Links ]
44. Bargagli AM, Sperati A, Davoli M, Forastiere F, Perucci CA. Mortality among problem drug users in Rome: an 18-year follow-up study, 1980-97. Addiction. 2001;96(10):1455-63. [ Links ]
45. Fugelstad A, Annell A, Rajs J, Agren G. Mortality and causes and manner of death among drug addicts in Stockholm during the period 1981-1992. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;96(3):169-75. [ Links ]
46 . Sánchez-Carbonell X, Seus L. Ten-year survival analysis of a cohort of heroin addicts in Catalonia: the EMETYST project. Addiction. 2000;95(6):941-8. [ Links ]
47. Chen CC, Kuo CJ, Tsai SY. Causes of death of patients with substance dependence: a record-linkage study in a psychiatric hospital in Taiwan. Addiction. 2001;96(5):729-36. [ Links ]
48. Quaglio G, Talamini G, Lechi A, Venturini L, Lugoboni F, Mezzelani P; Gruppo Intersert di Collaborazione Scientifica (GICS). Study of 2708 heroin-related deaths in north-eastern Italy 1985-98 to establish the main causes of death. Addiction. 2001;96(8):1127-37. [ Links ]
49. Zanis DA, Woody GE. One-year mortality rates following methadone treatment discharge. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;52(3):257-60. [ Links ]
50. Roy E, Haley N, Leclerc P, Sochanski B, Boudreau JF, Boivin JF. Mortality in a cohort of street youth in Montreal. JAMA. 2004;292(5):569-74. [ Links ]
51. Hickman M, Carnwath Z, Madden P, Farrell M, Rooney C, Ashcroft R, Judd A, Stimson G. Drug-related mortality and fatal overdose risk: pilot cohort study of heroin users recruited from specialist drug treatment sites in London. J Urban Health. 2003;80(2):274-87. [ Links ]
52. Engstrom A, Adamsson C, Allebeck P, Rydberg U. Mortality in patients with substance abuse: a follow-up in Stockholm County, 1973-1984. Int J Addict. 1991;26(1):91-106. [ Links ]
53. Wahren CA, Allebeck P, Rajs J. Unnatural causes of death among drug addicts in Stockholm: an analysis of health care and autopsy records. Subst Use Misuse. 1997;32(14):2163-83. [ Links ]
54. Eskild A, Magnus P, Samuelsen SO, Sohlberg C, Kittelsen P. Differences in mortality rates and causes of death between HIV positive and HIV negative intravenous drug users. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22(2):315-20. [ Links ]
55. Bartu A, Freeman NC, Gawthorne GS, Codde JP, Holman CD. Mortality in a cohort of opiate and amphetamine users in Perth, Western Australia. Addiction. 2004;99(1):53-60. [ Links ]
56. Poser W, Poser S, Eva-Condemarin P. Mortality in patients with dependence on prescription drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1992;30(1):49-57. [ Links ]
57. Piesiur-Strehlow B, Strehlow U, Poser W. Mortality of patients dependent on benzodiazepines. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986;73(3):330-5. [ Links ]
58. World Health Organization (WHO). Youth violence. In: WHO. World report on violence and health. Geneve: WHO; 2002. p. 25-56. [ Links ]
59. Parker RN, Auerhahn K. Alcohol, drugs, and violence. Annu Rev Sociol. 1998;24:291-311. [ Links ]
60. MacDonald JM, Gover AR. Concentrated disadvantage and youth-on-youth homicide: assessing the structural covariates over time. Homicide Studies. 2005;9(1):30-54. [ Links ]
61. Blumstein A, Rivara FP, Rosenfeld R. The rise and decline of homicide and why. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:505-41. [ Links ]
62. Krug EG, Powell KE, Dahlberg LL. Firearm-related deaths in the United States and 35 other high- and upper-middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(2):214-21. [ Links ]
63. Reinarman C, Levine HG. The crack attack: politics and media in the crack scare. In: Reinarman C, Levine HG, eds. Crack in America demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1997. p. 18-52. [ Links ]
64. Goldstein PJ. The relationship between drugs and violence in the United States of America. In: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODOC). World Drug Report 1997. Geneve: UNO; 1997. [ Links ]
65. Goldstein PJ, Brownstein HH, Ryan PJ, Belluci PA. Crack and homicide in New York City: a case study in the epidemiology of violence. Reinarman C, Levine HG (editors). Crack in America demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997. p. 113-30. [ Links ]
66. Varano SP, Cancino JM. An empirical analysis of deviant homicides in Chicago. Homicide Studies. 2001 5(1):5-29. [ Links ]
67. Bowling B. The rise and fall of New York murder zero tolerance or crack's decline? Brit J Criminol. 1999;39(4) 531-54. [ Links ]
68. Jorge MH, Gawryszewski VP, Latorre MR. I - Análise dos dados de mortalidade. Rev Saude Publica. 1997;31(Supl 5):5-25. [ Links ]
69. Souza ER. Homicídios no Brasil: o grande vilão da saúde pública na década de 80. Cad Saude Publica. 1994;10 (Supl 1):45-60. [ Links ]
70. Gawryszewski VP, Koizumi MS, Mello-Jorge MH. As causas externas no Brasil no ano 2000: comparando a mortalidade e a morbidade. Cad Saude Publica. 2004;20(4):995-1003. [ Links ]
71. Freitas ED, Paim JS, Silva LM, Costa MC. Evolução e distribuição espacial da mortalidade por causas externas em Salvador. Cad Saude Publica. 2000;16(4):1059-70. [ Links ]
72. Lima MC, Souza ER, Ximenes R, Albuquerque MF, Bitoun J, Barros MD. Evolução de homicídios por área geográfica em Pernambuco entre 1980 e 1998. Rev Saude Publica. 2002;36(4):462-9. [ Links ]
73. Barata RB, Ribeiro MCSA, Moraes JC. Tendência temporal da mortalidade por homicídios na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil, 1979-1994. Cad Saude Publica. 1999;15(4):711-8. [ Links ]
74. Gawryszewski VP, Mello-Jorge MH. Mortalidade violenta no Município de São Paulo nos últimos 40 anos. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2000;3(1-3):50-69. [ Links ]
75. Cordeiro R, Donalisio MRC. Homicídios masculinos na Região Metropolitana de São Paulo entre 1979 e 1998: uma abordagem pictórica. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(3):669-77. [ Links ]
76. Vermelho LL, Mello-Jorge MH. Mortalidade de jovens: análise do período de 1930 a 1991 (a transição epidemiológica para a violência). Rev Saude Publica. 1996;30(4):319-31. [ Links ]
77. Souza ER, Assis SG, Silva CM. Violência no Município do Rio de Janeiro: áreas de risco e tendência da mortalidade entre adolescentes de 10-19 anos. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1997;1(5):389-98. [ Links ]
78. Lima ML, Ximenes R. Violência e morte: diferenciais da mortalidade por causas externas no espaço urbano do Recife, 1991. Cad Saude Publica 1998;14(4):829-40. [ Links ]
79. Barata RB, Ribeiro MC, Moraes JC. Desigualdades sociais e homicídios em adolescentes e adultos jovens na cidade de São Paulo em 1995. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 1999;2(1-2):50-9. [ Links ]
80. Santos SM, Barcellos C, Carvalho MS, Flores R. Detecção de aglomerados espaciais de óbitos por causas violentas em Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, 1996. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(5):1141-51. [ Links ]
81. Drumond Jr M, Barros MB. Desigualdades socioespaciais na mortalidade do adulto no Município de São Paulo. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 1999;2(1-2):34-49. [ Links ]
82. Barata RB, Ribeiro MC. Relação entre homicídios e indicadores econômicos em São Paulo, Brasil, 1996. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2000;7(2):118-24. [ Links ]
83. Macedo AC, Paim JS, Silva LM, Costa Md Mda C. Violência e desigualdade social: mortalidade por homicídios e condições de vida em Salvador, Brasil. Rev Saude Publica. 2001;35(6):515-22. [ Links ]
84. Gawryszewski VP, Costa LS. Social inequality and homicide rates in São Paulo City, Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(2):191-7. [ Links ]
85. Dunn J, Ferri CP, Laranjeira R. Does multisite sampling improve the patient heterogeneity in drug misuse research? Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;63(1):79-85. [ Links ]
86. Szwarcwald CL, Castilho EA. Mortalidade por armas de fogo no estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: uma análise espacial. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1998;4(3):161-70. [ Links ]
87. Peres MF, Santos PC. Mortalidade por homicídios no Brasil na década de 90: o papel das armas de fogo. Rev Saude Publica. 2005;39(1):58-66. [ Links ]
88. Beato-Filho CC, Assuncao RM, Silva BF, Marinho FC, Reis IA, Almeida MC. Conglomerados de homicídios e o trafico de drogas em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, de 1995 a 1999. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17(5):1163-71. [ Links ]
89. Minayo MC, Deslandes SF. A complexidade das relações entre drogas, álcool e violência. Cad Saude Publica. 1998;14(1):35-42. [ Links ]
90. Baptista M, Minayo MCS, Aquino MTC, Assis SG. Global studies of illegal drug markets in Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: NEPAD/UERJ CLAVES/FIOCRUZ; 2000. [ Links ]
91. Sant'Anna AR, Lopes MJ. Homicides among teenagers in the city of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil: vulnerability, susceptibility and gender cultures. Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18(6):1509-17. [ Links ]
Unidade de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas (UNIAD UNIFESP)
Rua Botucatu, 390 - Vila Clementino
04023-061 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Phone & Fax: (55 11) 5575-1708
Submitted: January 20 2006
Accepted: May 18 2006
Financing: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, The State of São Paulo Research Foundation), nº 99/05016-3
Conflicts of interest: None