Print version ISSN 1516-4446
Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. vol.28 no.4 São Paulo Dec. 2006 Epub Oct 18, 2006
Ciclagem afetiva associada a tratamento com antidepressivo no transtorno bipolar: estudo caso-controle prospectivo
Renata Sayuri TamadaI; José Antônio AmaralI; Cilly Kluger IsslerI; Andrew Alan NierenbergII; Beny LaferI
IBipolar Disorder Research Program, Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clínicas, Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIBipolar Clinic and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
OBJECTIVE: Treatment-emergent affective switch has been associated to cycle acceleration and poorer outcome, but there are few studies addressing this issue. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcome of patients presenting treatment-emergent affective switch with patients with spontaneous mania, regarding presence and polarity of a new episode and time to relapse.
METHOD: Twenty-four patients with bipolar disorder according to the DSM-IV were followed for 12 months. Twelve patients had treatment-emergent affective switch and twelve had spontaneous mania. Patients were evaluated weekly with the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale until remission of the index episode, and monthly until completion of the 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Eleven patients with treatment-emergent affective switch had a recurrence on follow-up, all of them with major depressive episodes. In the group with spontaneous mania, six patients had a recurrence: two had a depressive episode, and four had a manic episode (p = 0.069 for new episode, p = 0.006 for polarity of the episode). Patients with treatment-emergent affective switch relapsed in a shorter period than patients with spontaneous mania (p = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: In this first prospective study, treatment-emergent affective switch patients were at greater risk of relapses, especially depressive episodes, and presented a shorter duration of remission when compared with patients with spontaneous mania.
Descriptors: Bipolar disorder; Clinical protocol; Antidepressive agents; Treatment outcome; Affective symptoms
OBJETIVO: A ciclagem para mania associada ao antidepressivo tem sido relacionada à aceleração do ciclo e pior evolução, mas há poucos estudos na literatura sobre este assunto. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar prospectivamente a evolução de pacientes com mania associada a antidepressivo com pacientes com mania espontânea, em relação a tempo para recaída e polaridade do novo episódio.
MÉTODO: Vinte e quatro pacientes com transtorno bipolar, de acordo com os critérios diagnósticos do DSM-IV, foram seguidos por 12 meses: 12 pacientes com mania associada a antidepressivo e 12 pacientes com mania espontânea. Os pacientes foram avaliados semanalmente com a Escala para Mania de Young e a Escala para Depressão de Hamilton até remissão do episódio inicial e, mensalmente, até completar o período de seguimento de 12 meses.
RESULTADOS: Onze pacientes com mania associada ao antidepressivo tiveram uma recorrência no seguimento, sendo todos os episódios depressivos. No grupo de mania espontânea, seis pacientes apresentaram recorrência, sendo dois episódios depressivos, e quatro episódios de mania (p = 0,069 para novo episódio e p = 0,006 para polaridade do episódio). Pacientes com mania associada a antidepressivo recaíram em um menor período de tempo que os pacientes com mania espontânea (p = 0,016).
CONCLUSÕES: Neste estudo prospectivo, os pacientes com mania associada a antidepressivo apresentaram maior risco de recorrência, especialmente episódios depressivos, e com menor duração de remissão quando comparados aos pacientes com mania espontânea.
Descritores: Transtorno bipolar; Protocolos clínicos; Antidepressivos; Resultado do tratamento; Sintomas afetivos
Antidepressants have been associated with induction of mania and cycle acceleration. Case series and observational studies report an incidence of induction of mania between 0 to 94.5% depending on the study design and class of the antidepressant utilized.1-5 Controlled studies have suggested that treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS) is less severe than spontaneous mania.6-7 Furthermore, the severity of mania may be associated with the class of the antidepressant utilized.8
Antidepressants may also change the course and outcome of bipolar disorder. Many authors have observed and reported the induction of cycle acceleration and rapid cycling after antidepressant use, with a rate ranging from 2 to 67%.9-12
Kukopulos et al. followed 434 bipolar patients, from which 115 (26.5%) presented a continuous course, without periods of euthymia. From this group, 59 patients (51%) had this course changed after using an antidepressant.11 In another study, Kukopulos et al. observed that patients who experienced antidepressant-induced rapid cycling had an increase in the frequency of episodes from 0.8 per year to 6.5 per year.13 Pickar et al. suggested that antidepressants could modify the course of the disorder by sensitization, that is, the exposure to an antidepressant would make the patient more sensitive to the next exposure to an antidepressant.14
There is only one prospective and controlled study about cycle acceleration, published by Wehr et al. in 1988.12 The authors followed 51 patients who were their own controls. In this study, half of the patients presented with rapid cycling and the investigators concluded that the cycling persisted because of the use of tricyclic antidepressants. Some patients had antidepressant-associated mania, and within weeks they had a depressive relapse, although they were still taking antidepressants.
Altshuler et al. suggested that TEAS may be a marker for a greater vulnerability to cycle acceleration induced by antidepressants.15 They retrospectively analyzed the life charts of 51 bipolar refractory patients and observed that 46% of the patients with antidepressant-associated mania and 14% with spontaneous mania presented with cycle acceleration. In this study, cycle acceleration was associated with younger age at first treatment, and was more likely to occur in women and bipolar II patients.
Other risk factors have been implicated in antidepressant-induced cycle acceleration: female gender, patients with predominantly manic episodes, previous history of rapid cycling, cyclothymic temperament, bipolar disorder type I, and hypothyroidism.11,16-21 It is important to note that those studies were open and retrospective.
These studies suggest that antidepressants can induce cycle acceleration in patients with bipolar disorder and in some cases of rapid cycling. As most of the studies were open, retrospective and non-controlled, the results must be carefully considered.
In this report, we prospectively followed patients with spontaneous mania and antidepressant-associated mania to compare the risk, polarity, and timing of mood relapses. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective case-control study of the outcome of patients with treatment-emergent mania.
Twenty-four patients with bipolar disorder according to DSM-IV were divided into two groups: 12 consecutively admitted patients with spontaneous mania and 12 consecutively admitted patients with antidepressant-induced mania. Patients were recruited from the Bipolar Disorder Research Program at the Institute of Psychiatry of Universidade de São Paulo Medical School.
Inclusion criteria were patients between 18 and 60 years of both genders with bipolar disorder according to the DSM-IV,22 with a manic, hypomanic or mixed episode, and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)23 index score of 12 points or more. Patients with rapid cycling in the last year according to the DSM-IV, current diagnosis of abuse and/or addiction to alcohol or drugs, or organic cerebral disease were excluded.
Patients with antidepressant-associated mania were included only if they had received an antidepressant for at least three consecutive days within the previous two weeks. Patients with spontaneous mania were included if they had not received antidepressants in the preceding two months.
The diagnosis was made using the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV, Patient Version (SCID-P). Twenty-four subjects were rated with the YMRS and the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D).24 Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction in the YMRS index score and remission as a score of 6 or less on the YMRS. Patients were evaluated once a week until remission and monthly thereafter.
During follow-up, it was considered a new episode when it occurred after a period of at least two months of euthymia. Mania, hypomania, depression or mixed episodes were diagnosed according to the DSM-IV plus a score of 12 or more on the YMRS for a manic or hypomanic episode, 16 or more on the HAM-D for a depressive episode, and both scores for a mixed episode.
Data was analyzed using the SPSS software version 10.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Science). Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical data. All p values were based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05. Time to relapse was analyzed using Kaplan-Meyer Survival analysis and log-rank test.
This study was approved by the Ethic Commitee of the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (process number 188/99).
Patients with TEAS were older, had a longer duration of illness, more previous episodes, higher prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism, and reported more previous episodes of mania associated with antidepressant use. TEAS was less severe, with a lower incidence of psychotic symptoms, a lower YMRS index score, and rarely required hospitalization. The interval from intervention to response and remission was similar in both groups. These baseline results were reported in detail elsewhere.7
All 24 patients had bipolar disorder, 23 had type I, and one had type II. Twenty-two patients had had at least one previous episode of depression. Eight patients with spontaneous mania and one patient with antidepressant-associated mania required hospitalization. Criteria for discharge from the hospital were not standardized. Patients with TEAS presented manic symptoms in average 12 weeks after starting an antidepressant (range: 3-26 weeks). The antidepressants used were sertraline (n = 4), venlafaxine (n = 1), fluoxetine (n = 2), paroxetine (n = 4), nortryptiline (n = 1), imipramine (n = 1), and amitryptiline (n = 1). Antidepressants were stopped in all patients with antidepressant-associated mania. Two patients were receiving only antidepressants in the index episode and a mood stabilizer was introduced during their treatment. Nine patients received a combination of two antipsychotics and four received a combination of two mood stabilizers.
During follow-up, six patients in the group with spontaneous mania had a new episode: four had a manic episode and two had a depressive episode. In the TEAS group, 11 patients had a new depressive episode. Although the proportion of patients who had a new episode in each group did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.069), there was a significant difference between groups for polarity of the new episode (p = 0.006).
Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test indicated that patients with TEAS had significantly shorter duration of remission compared to patients with spontaneous mania (p = 0.016) (Figure 1).
Four patients in the TEAS group had cycle acceleration after the index episode and met criteria for rapid cycling. No patients presented rapid cycling during follow-up in the spontaneous mania group (p = 0.093 Fisher's Exact Test).
Our study suggests that patients with TEAS have a poorer outcome, a higher rate of recurrence and a shorter duration of remission when compared to patients with spontaneous mania. These findings are in agreement with a study by Kukopulos et al.,13 who observed an increased number of episodes after antidepressant use. Altshuler et al. observed that 46% of the patients with antidepressant-associated mania presented cycle acceleration. In our study, 33.3% developed rapid cycling.15
All patients with TEAS were discontinued from antidepressants and experienced a depressive relapse some weeks later. This relapse could be associated with early antidepressant discontinuation, or it may be due simply to a greater severity of the illness of TEAS patients. Altshuler et al. suggested that early antidepressant discontinuation is associated with a fourfold increase in the risk of depressive relapses in some patients with bipolar disorder type I.25 Ghaemi et al. suggest that antidepressants should be maintained only in those who repeatedly relapse after antidepressant discontinuation, a minority that they estimate represents 15-20% of bipolar depressed patients.26 However, in our study these patients represented the majority of cases of TEAS (66.7% of the patients presented previous TEAS).
Although the impact and necessity of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar patients have been largely discussed, there is still no agreement about their use.27-28 Some authors suggest that antidepressants may destabilize mood and should be used only in severe depression,29 while others believe that treatment guidelines are too restrictive concerning the use of antidepressants in bipolar patients.30
Our study has limitations. The small sample may limit the generalization of the data, although it is important to note that, even with this small sample, significant differences were found between the groups. Patients were assigned to each outcome group on a non-random basis. Medication use was not controlled. Nevertheless, our study is unique in comparing prospectively antidepressant-associated mania and spontaneous mania during a 12-month follow-up.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo FAPESP (# 99/02079-4) provided a two-year scholarship to the corresponding author.
1. Wehr TA, Goodwin FK. Can antidepressants cause mania and worsen the course of affective illness? Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144(11):1403-11. [ Links ]
2. Haykal RF, Akiskal HS. Bupropion as a promising approach to rapid cycling bipolar II patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51(11):450-5. [ Links ]
3. Sachs GS, Lafer B, Stoll AL, Banov M, Thibault AB, Tohen M, Rosenbaum JF. A double blind trial of bupropion versus desipramine for bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55(9):391-3. [ Links ]
4. Young ML, Pitts CD, Oakes R, Gergel IP. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effect of paroxetine and imipramine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Presented at the Second International Conference on Bipolar Disorder; June, 1997; Pittsburgh, PA. Abstract NR66:66. [ Links ]
5. Nemeroff CB, Evans DL, Gyulai L, Sachs GS, Bowden CL, Gergel IP, Oakes R, Pitts CD. Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(6):906-12. [ Links ]
6. Stoll AL, Mayer PV, Kolbrener M, Goldstein E, Suplit B, Lucier J, Cohen BM, Tohen M. Antidepressant-associated mania: a controlled comparison with spontaneous mania. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(11):1642-5. [ Links ]
7. Tamada RS, Issler CK, Amaral JA, Lafer B. Treatment emergent affective switch: a controlled study. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(4):333-7. [ Links ]
8. Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, Houck P. Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(7):910-6. [ Links ]
9. Coppen A, Whybrow PC, Noguera R, Maggs R, Prange AJ Jr. The comparative antidepressant value of L-tryptophan and imipramine with and without attempted potentiation by liothyronine. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;26(3):234-45. [ Links ]
10. van Scheyen JD. Recurrent vital depression. A follow-up study of 56 female and 28 male patients. Psychiatr Neurol Neurochir. 1973;76(2):93-112. [ Links ]
11. Kukopulos A, Reginaldi D, Laddomada P, Floris G, Serra G, Tondo L. Course of the manic-depressive cycle and changes caused by treatment. Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1980;13(4):156-67. [ Links ]
12. Wehr TA, Sack DA, Rosenthal NE, Cowdry RW. Rapid cycling affective disorder: contributing factors and treatment responses in 51 patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(2):179-84. [ Links ]
13. Kukopulos A, Caliari B, Tundo A, Minnai G, Floris G, Reginaldi D, Tondo L. Rapid cyclers, temperament and antidepressants. Compr Psychiatry. 1983;24(3):249-58. [ Links ]
14. Pickar D, Cowdry RW, Zis AP, Cohen RM, Murphy DL. Mania and hypomania during antidepressant pharmacotherapy: clinical and research implications. In: Post RM, Ballenger JC, editors. Neurobiology of mood disorders. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins; 1984. p. 836-45. [ Links ]
15. Altshuler LL, Post RM, Leverich GS, Mikalauskas K, Rosoff A, Ackerman L. Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(8):1130-8. [ Links ]
16. Cowdry RW, Wehr TA, Zis AP, Goodwin FK. Thyroid abnormalities associated with rapid-cycling bipolar illness. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(4):414-20. [ Links ]
17. Cho JT, Bone S, Dunner DL, Colt E, Fieve RR. The effect of lithium treatment on thyroid function on patients with primary affective disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1979;136(1):115-6. [ Links ]
18. Quitkin FM, Kane J, Rifkin A, Ramos-Lorenzi JR, Nayak DV. Prophylactic lithium carbonate with and without imipramine for bipolar I patients. A double-blind study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(8):902-7. [ Links ]
19. Quitkin FM, Rabkin JG, Prien RF. Bipolar disorder: are there manic-prone and depressive-prone forms? J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1986;6(3):167-72. [ Links ]
20. Akiskal HS. External validating criteria for psychiatric diagnosis: their application in affective disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 1980;41(12 Pt 2):6-15. [ Links ]
21. Kupfer DJ, Carpenter LL, Frank E. Possible role of antidepressants in precipitating mania and hypomania in recurrent depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(7):804-8. [ Links ]
22. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press; 1994. [ Links ]
23. Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;133:429-35. [ Links ]
24. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosur Psychiatry. 1960;23:56-62. [ Links ]
25. Altshuler L, Suppes T, Black D, Nolen WA, Keck PE Jr, Frye MA, McElroy S, Kupka R, Grunze H, Walden J, Leverich G, Denicoff K, Luckenbaugh D, Post R. Impact of antidepressant discontinuation after acute bipolar depression remission on rates of depressive relapse at 1-year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(7):1252-62. [ Links ]
26. Ghaemi SN, Hsu DJ, Soldani F, Goodwin FK. Antidepressants in bipolar disorder: the case for caution. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5(6):421-33. [ Links ]
27. Vestergaard P. Guidelines for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder: are there discrepancies between European and North American recommendations? Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(6):519-22. [ Links ]
28. Frye MA, Gitlin MJ, Altshuler LL. Unmet needs in bipolar depression. Depress Anxiety. 2004;19(4):199-208. [ Links ]
29. American Psychiatric Association. Practice Guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(4 Suppl):1-50. [ Links ]
30. Moller HJ, Grunze H. Have some guidelines for the treatment of acute bipolar depression gone too far in the restriction of antidepressants? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;250(2):57-68. [ Links ]
Renata S. Tamada, MD
Av. Padre Pereira de Andrade, 545, apto. 153F
05469-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Phone: (+55 11) 3023-4811 Fax: (+55 11) 3069-6648
Submitted: July 13, 2006
Accepted: August 1, 2006
Financing: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (# 99/02079-4).
Conflict of interests: None
Projeto de Assistência e Pesquisa em Transtorno Afetivo Bipolar (Proman), Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP).