SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue2Systematized physical activity and cognitive performance in elderly with Alzheimer's dementia: a systematic reviewPost-therapy group for pathological gamblers: improvement beyond symptoms author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry

Print version ISSN 1516-4446On-line version ISSN 1809-452X

Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. vol.31 no.2 São Paulo June 2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462009000200015 

REVIEW

 

Facial emotion recognition in bipolar disorder: a critical review

 

Reconhecimento de emoções faciais: artigo de revisão

 

 

Cristiana Castanho de Almeida RoccaI,II; Eveline van den HeuvelIII; Sheila C. CaetanoII; Beny LaferII

IPsychology and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Medical School, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIBipolar Disorder Research Program (PROMAN), Institute and Department of Psychiatry, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) Medical School, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIIDepartment of Neuroscience, Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Literature review of the controlled studies in the last 18 years in emotion recognition deficits in bipolar disorder.
METHOD: A bibliographical research of controlled studies with samples larger than 10 participants from 1990 to June 2008 was completed in Medline, Lilacs, PubMed and ISI. Thirty-two papers were evaluated.
RESULTS: Euthymic bipolar disorder presented impairment in recognizing disgust and fear. Manic BD showed difficult to recognize fearful and sad faces. Pediatric bipolar disorder patients and children at risk presented impairment in their capacity to recognize emotions in adults and children faces. Bipolar disorder patients were more accurate in recognizing facial emotions than schizophrenic patients.
DISCUSSION: Bipolar disorder patients present impaired recognition of disgust, fear and sadness that can be partially attributed to mood-state. In mania, they have difficult to recognize fear and disgust. Bipolar disorder patients were more accurate in recognizing emotions than depressive and schizophrenic patients. Bipolar disorder children present a tendency to misjudge extreme facial expressions as being moderate or mild in intensity.
CONCLUSION: Affective and cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder vary according to the mood states. Follow-up studies re-testing bipolar disorder patients after recovery are needed in order to investigate if these abnormalities reflect a state or trait marker and can be considered an endophenotype. Future studies should aim at standardizing task and designs.

Descriptors: Bipolar disorder; Facial expression; Schizophrenia; Depression; Expressed emotion


RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Revisão da literatura de estudos controlados publicados nos últimos 18 anos sobre déficits no reconhecimento de emoções no transtorno bipolar.
MÉTODO: Foi realizada uma pesquisa bibliográfica no Medline, Lilacs, PubMed e ISI, selecionando-se o período de 1990 a junho de 2008. Foram incluídos apenas estudos controlados, que tivessem uma das amostras com mais de 10 participantes, totalizando 32 artigos.
RESULTADOS: Bipolares eutímicos apresentaram prejuízo no reconhecimento de nojo e medo. Em mania, mostraram dificuldade para reconhecer medo e tristeza. Transtorno bipolar pediátrico e crianças de risco apresentam dificuldade para reconhecer emoções nos rostos de adultos e de crianças. Bipolares foram mais precisos para reconhecer emoções do que os pacientes esquizofrênicos.
DISCUSSÃO: Pacientes com transtorno bipolar apresentam prejuízo no reconhecimento de nojo, medo e tristeza, os quais podem ser apenas em parte atribuídos ao estado de humor. No episódio maníaco, eles têm dificuldade para reconhecer medo e nojo. Entretanto, eles são mais precisos no reconhecimento de emoções do que pacientes deprimidos e esquizofrênicos. Crianças com transtorno bipolar apresentam tendência a julgar expressões faciais extremas como sendo de intensidade leve ou moderada.
CONCLUSÃO: Déficits afetivos e cognitivos em bipolares sofrem variações dependendo do estado de humor. Estudos de seguimento, reavaliando pacientes após a remissão dos sintomas, são necessários para investigar se estas anormalidades refletem um estado ou traço da doença e se podem ser consideradas endofenótipos. Estudos futuros devem padronizar tarefas e metodologia.

Descritores: Transtorno bipolar; Expressão facial, Esquizofrenia; Depressão; Emoções manifestadas


 

 

Introdution

The ability to process and identify facial emotions is an essential component of human communication and social interaction. Though social interaction may vary according to cultural norms and customs, cross-cultural studies have repeatedly provided evidence in favor of the universality of facial emotions. Six universal emotions have since been established, including, happiness, sadness, anger, fear, disgust and surprise, each of which corresponds to a specific arrangement of facial muscles and has partially separable neurocircuitry processes.1,2

The processing of facial emotions, which ranges from the interpretation of the stimulus to the preparation of an appropriate behavioral response, is supported by specific neural systems, that include ventromedial prefrontal areas, orbito-frontal areas, cortical areas of the fusiform gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus and occipital gyrus and, sub-cortical structures, such as the amygdala, ventral striatum, hippocampal formation, and dorsomedial nucleus of the thalamus.3,4 Specifically, the amygdala seems to play a crucial role as it is involved with the recognition of emotions from facial expressions, especially certain negatively valenced emotions such as fear.5 Supporting this hypothesis, functional studies in healthy individuals show that facial emotional processing is associated with activation of the amygdala.6,7

Bipolar disorder (BD) has consistently been coupled to cognitive impairments that hinder the cognitive and social functioning of BD patients.8,9 However, for years, these cognitive deficits were believed to disappear during euthymic states of the disorder. Growing bodies of evidence suggest that even when stable, BD patients suffer from trait-associated cognitive impairment.10,11

Recent studies have reported impairments on tests of face and facial emotion perception in BD but this body of literature is still somewhat limited. For example, it has not yet been determined whether these deficits are specific for facial affect and, whether they transcend all mood episodes of the disorder or are state dependent.

The objective of this study was to critically review the deficits of facial emotion perception and recognition detected in BD patients as well as subjects at risk for developing BD in order to investigate whether the detected deficits can serve as an endophenotype for the disorder.

 

Method

The research consisted of a literature review focused on controlled studies that described the characteristics of the processing of facial emotions in subjects with bipolar disorder, selecting the period from 1990 to 2008. A systematic search was conducted through Medline, using the following key words: "bipolar disorder and face recognition", "emotion recognition and bipolar disorder", "bipolar disorder and facial affect".

Inclusion criteria: studies published in English with a minimum sample size of ten (per group), examining facial emotion processing in bipolar disorder adults, children, including children at risk for bipolar disorder (n = 32).

Exclusion criteria: studies that analyzed only the group of bipolar patients without a control group (n = 3).

The studies were organized by the comparison between BD and the following samples: schizophrenia (n = 6), major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 2), and healthy controls (n = 6). We also included neuroimaging studies (n = 7) and studies with pediatric BD samples (n = 11). Twenty-nine studies had a healthy control group that was compared to the clinical samples.

 

Results

Studies included in this review are displayed in Table 1.

1. BD vs schizophrenia

Impaired emotion recognition had been more frequently documented in schizophrenic patients than in bipolar patients. The studies regarding the recognition of faces expressing emotions have given support to the hypothesis of a probable dysfunction of the right hemisphere (hypofunctioning) in patients with schizophrenia and those with mood disorders, especially major depressive disorder (MDD). The perception of emotional faces is accomplished primarily by the right brain hemisphere, which is also responsible for processing spatial information.12 In bipolar disorder, the findings are not clear yet.

David and Cutting evaluated the role of right hemisphere activation in positive and negative affect in schizophrenic, manic and depressive patients in comparison with a healthy control group using a happy-sad chimeric face test to examine.13 This test can elicit a left-sided perceptual bias in right-handed healthy subjects. Healthy controls and manic patients had significant left bias, while depressive patients had a weaker bias and schizophrenic patients showed no significant bias. Possible explanations are right hemisphere hyperfunction in mania, moderate relative hypofunction in depression, and severe relative hypofunction in schizophrenia. The marked difference between mania and schizophrenia supports distinct pathophysiologies underlying these two conditions.

In 1996, Bellack et al. noticed that schizophrenic and BD patients made more errors than control subjects on Face Recognition and Speech-Sounds Perception tests.14 Performance was not correlated to symptom measures of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or associated with the use of medication. It was suggested that while patients with schizophrenia and BD may suffer difficulties in accurately processing cues in their direct environment, these are not specific for the perception of emotional expressions.

Addington and Addington compared 40 stable schizophrenic patients, 40 euthymic BD patients and 40 control subjects on the Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Forced-Choice Span of Apprehension Test (SPAN), a Facial Affect Recognition Test, a Facial Affect Discrimination Test, a Face Recognition Test, and the Rey Memory Test.15 Schizophrenic patients were tested at two illness stages: 1) at acute relapse and, 2) 3 months later during partial remission. No differences were found in schizophrenic patients in stages 1 and 2 on tests of face recognition and attention. In stage 1, negative symptoms correlated to accuracy scores on the facial discrimination task; and in stage 2 they correlated to both facial affect, face recognition and attention tasks. In comparison to control subjects, schizophrenic patients made significantly more mistakes on facial affect tasks, the face recognition test, the SPAN, CPT and the Rey. BD patients differed from controls only in the facial discrimination task and the Rey recall. Scores on attentional tasks were correlated to facial affect scores only for the schizophrenic group.

In 1999, Lior applied a chimeric face test to 15 schizophrenic patients with positive symptoms, 20 schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms, 10 manic BD patients, 10 depressed BD patients and 37 control subjects.16 All patients were taking antipsychotic medications. The task was composed of 4 schematic drawings of chimeric faces (one hemi-face happy or sad), which were mirror-imaged, and two composite faces. Subjects were asked to answer two questions for each stimulus: 1) what does the person feel, and 2) how intensely is the emotion being expressed.

Control subjects and depressed BD patients judged chimeric faces correctly. Schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms judged positive faces as negative and vice versa, while schizophrenics with positive symptoms and manic BD judged all faces as positive. For composite faces all groups judged appropriately. Considering that 90% of control subjects displayed left hemi-face bias (LHB), emotional stimuli are likely to be processed by the right hemisphere. All patients showed only a weak LHB. In fact, negative schizophrenics showed a right hemi-face bias (RHB) instead. Since deficits were only found for chimeric face interpretation, the author suggests that hemispheric disruptions may only be seen using complex stimuli.

Loughland et al. conducted a visual scan-path study on facial emotion perception in 63 schizophrenics, 27 MDD, 17 BD and 61 control subjects.17 Subjects were tested on Face and Facial Affect Recognition Tasks. For the Facial Affect Task, which consisted of stimuli from the Ekman and Friesen Series of Facial Affect, subjects were asked to match the stimulus face to one of either 3 (happy, sad or neutral) or 7 (happy, sad, angry, fearful, disgusted, surprised or neutral) emotions. For the Face Task, they had to match the stimulus face to one of 3 or 7 possible answer faces. Each task consisted of identifiable (non-degraded) and non-identifiable (degraded) faces. For facial recognition, groups differed only in their performance on the 7-choice designs.

Affective and schizophrenic patients were both less accurate at matching non-degraded faces than control subjects. For facial affect recognition groups differed only for the recognition of happiness in a 7-choice design. Schizophrenic patients were less accurate at labeling happy faces than both affective patients and controls. Visual scan-path data showed that for degraded faces schizophrenic patients suffered from restricted scanning strategies, while BD patients tended to avoid specific facial features (eyes, nose, and mouth) and made a significantly reduced number of fixations.

Schizophrenic patients may suffer from fundamental deficits in visuo-cognitive strategies of face perception, which is likely to be trait-based, whereas, the avoidance of salient facial features found in BD patients may be due to dysthymic mood states at time of testing, reflecting state-based attentional disturbances in the perception of socially relevant stimuli.

In a recent research, Vaskinn et al. verified that schizophrenic and BD patients had no difficulty to recognize emotions in facial pictures in comparison with healthy controls, however, only schizophrenic patients presented reduced auditory emotion perception. Comparing by gender, only healthy and schizophrenic males performed worse than their female counterparts.18

Taken together, these studies suggested that BD patients may suffer from specific deficits in facial emotion recognition, but schizophrenic patients were less accurate in recognition emotions in faces than BD or MDD.

2. BD vs major depressive disorder

It has been hypothesized that deficits related to the right hemisphere were responsible for the difficulties in the recognition of emotions in patients with MDD.19

In 1992, Rubinow and Post applied a photograph-matching and a sentence-matching test to 7 patients with BD type I, 5 with BD type II, 5 with MDD and 31 control subjects.19 All patients were medication-free. Subjects had to match each of 48 photographs to 1 of 7 depicting different emotions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger, surprise, disgust and interest). Similarly, they had to match one of seven affect words to each of 48 sentences. Due to the small sample numbers, all affect patient data were grouped. Patients were impaired in photograph-matching but not in sentence-matching. Specifically, they made significantly more mistakes for sad faces, and tended to make more mistakes for happy faces in comparison to control subjects.

The deficits of facial emotion labeling in depressed patients were comparable to those found in right-hemisphere lesion patients. Thus, the deficit in facial emotion processing is likely to occur due to dysfunction in the right-hemisphere.

Kucharska-Pietura and David examined whether MDD would be related to a reduction in right-hemispheric arousal and mania to its increase, using a chimeric face test.20 Thirty BD patients, recovering from manic episodes, were compared to 30 MDD, 30 patients with right-hemisphere brain damage, 30 with left-hemisphere brain damage and 30 control subjects. BD patients were maintained on one or more mood stabilizers and additional benzodiazepines, and MDD patients were receiving antidepressants. The chimeric face test consisted of 12 hemi-faces with sad and happy expressions that were each mirror-imaged. On the face task, right-hemisphere damage and depressed patients were impaired in the recognition of happy faces and showed a significant reduction in left-hemisphere bias (LHB). Left-hemisphere damaged patients and manic BD patients showed normal LHB and performed as controls in the recognition of facial expressions. These results suggest that MDD patients are impaired in the ability to direct spatial attention, which is thought to be a right-hemisphere function. However, antidepressant medication may reduce right hemisphere activation while mood stabilizers may not.

3. Facial emotion perception in adults with bipolar disorder

Lembke and Ketter found that manic BD patients had worse overall performance, and especially suffered from deficits in the recognition of fear and disgust.21 They tended to label fear faces as surprise; and disgust as anger. In comparison to control subjects, euthymic BD II patients were significantly better at recognizing fear, while BD I patients were numerically better at recognizing fear. The perception of fear is specifically altered in BD considering the increased recognition in euthymic patients and the deficient recognition in mania. The finding that manic patients mistook fear for surprise could explain their aggressive approach behaviour.

Harmer et al. noted that euthymic BD patients showed a slight but significant impairment in the recognition of famous faces and a facilitated recognition of disgust, being more accurate in their recognition than control subjects.22

Getz et al. compared 25 medicated manic BD patients to 25 control subjects on the Benton Face Recognition Test, and novel computerized tests of face and facial affect recognition.23 Patients made significantly more errors on the facial affect recognition task than controls. There were no significant performance differences between patients who were on or off mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, antidepressants and benzodiazepines, but the sample size was small. Furthermore, no group differences appeared for either of the face tasks, though BD patients had slower reaction times. These results suggest that BD patients suffer from specific deficits of facial emotion perception.

In 2004, Venn et al. compared 17 euthymic medicated BD patients to 17 control subjects on the Benton Face Recognition Test and a facial emotion recognition task.24 No group differences were found in scores of face recognition. For facial emotion recognition, BD patients were less accurate in recognizing fear. No evidence for trait-like deficits of facial emotion recognition in BD was determined.

Bora et al. examined 43 euthymic medicated BD patients and 30 control subjects through the Eyes Test, the Hinting Test, basic face and emotion recognition tests and tests of sustained attention.25 This study intended to determine whether BD patients suffer from theory of mind (ToM) deficits. Impaired performance of BD patients on both ToM tests (Eyes and Hinting), which were likely due to impairments on tests of emotion recognition and sustained attention, were demonstrated.

Bozikas et al. verified that patients with medicated BD in remission performed worse than controls in a test where they needed to identify emotion in human faces.26 They demonstrated that the impairment was not attributed to problems with facial perception per se, but to perception of the relative valence of facial expressions indicating emotions. The performance of patients was not correlated with age of onset and duration of illness, or with residual manic or depressive symptoms.

1) Imaging studies of facial affect recognition in adults with bipolar disorder

In 2000, Yurgelun-Todd et al. conducted the first imaging study on facial affect perception in BD.27 They hypothesized that if BD patients have functional deficits of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, they would show altered responses to facial stimuli. The prefrontal cortex is essential for assimilating and integrating information, and planning, inhibiting or initiating emotional responses. The authors chose to evaluate only happy and fearful affect as fearful affect was shown to elicit the largest orienting response in previous studies. Fourteen stable BD and 10 control subjects were scanned while passively viewing faces. Only 10 of the 14 BD patients were able to accurately identify fear. fMRI data for BD patients, in response to fear, showed a decrease in neural activation of the right prefrontal area and an increase in activation of the left amygdala in comparison to control subjects, suggesting alterations in the fronto-limbic circuitry. Nevertheless, cognitive as well as affective abilities were necessary to complete the task (concentration, attention, affect recall and affective labelling) making it difficult to draw specific conclusions from this study.

In accordance to findings in adults showing abnormalities in both memory and face-emotion processing, Lawrence et al. compared neural activation to emotional faces in 12 BD type I (3 euthymic, 7 had mild depression and 2 moderate to severe depression), 9 MDD and 11 control subjects.3 Although there were no behavioural differences in performance, functional abnormalities in sub-cortical, ventral and dorsal prefrontal regions in both patient groups were detected. In response to fear, BD patients showed an increased neural response in the right globus pallidus, the anterior thalamus, the left amygdala and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Control subjects showed increased response in the right amygdala and hippocampus, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In response to happy faces, BD patients showed increased responses in a large cluster extending from the left uncus, ventrally to the amygdala and caudate nucleus, and in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Control subjects showed an increased response in the right parahippocampal gyrus and thalamus, the midbrain, caudate nucleus and left amygdala, while MDD patients showed decreased responses in these areas. In response to sad faces, BD patients showed increased activity of the left hippocampus and the ventral prefrontal cortex, while controls showed increased responses in the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. Severity of depression was not correlated to the magnitude of neural response in BD patients, suggesting that differential activity is not likely to be symptom related. Instead it would reflect trait-like differences between BD, MDD and healthy controls in response to facial expressions.

Lennox et al. were the first group to scan patients in mania while viewing happy and sad faces from the Face and Emotion Expression: Series and Tests (FEEST).28 Ten manic BD patients and 12 control subjects performed the Benton Facial Memory Test. An attenuated subjective rating for sad faces in BD patients, which was linked to decreased activation of the subgenual anterior cingulate and amygdala, and an increased activation of the posterior cingulate and posterior insula were found. Neural response to happy faces was comparable for BD patients and controls. Results may reflect a positive bias for facial emotion perception in mania.

Corroborating this previous finding, Foland et al. showed that manic patients had a reduced ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) regulation of amygdala response during the emotion labelling task.29 The authors discussed that the reductions in inhibitory frontal activity in mania may lead to an increased reactivity of amygdala.

Finally, Malhi et al. scanned 10 hypomanic BD patients and 10 controls while viewing captioned pictures from the Teasedale Video-playback series.30 In these experiments negative or positive affect was evoked by the caption rather than the picture. Subjective ratings of affect were similar for controls and patients, but fMRI data showed significant differences in areas of activation. In response to negative affect patients showed much less cortical activation than controls, while presenting activation in similar areas for positive affect. These results offer supporting evidence for a positive bias in mania.

Malhi et al. showed that 10 female BD patients in remission were as equally accurate in identifying facial expression as 10 female healthy controls but were slower to respond to fear and disgust, which resulted in activation by amygdala and insula.31 However, facial expressions to fear produced greater activation in euthymic BD patients in hippocampal structures, the inferior parietal and superior temporal cortices and the cerebellum, and disgust faces produced greater activation in healthy subjects with significant differences in frontal cortex, right insula and visual processing regions. It is possible that in BD prefrontal subcortical network dysfunction that relegates neural processing to limbic regions is impaired.

Chen et al. verified that depressed and manic patients exhibited abnormal neural responses to sad, fearful, and happy facial expressions. They exhibited overactivated responses to fearful faces, as well as to mood incongruent facial expressions, with the depressed group exhibiting overactivity in the fusiform gyrus in response to sad faces.32 Manic patients also showed an altered response to sad faces, their corticolimbic regions were overactivated for implicit processing and underactivated for explicit processing.32 The activation pattern observed in this study for depressed patients was similar to the one found in previous fMRI studies which demonstrated, that depressed and euthymic BD patients overactivated specific brain regions in response to positive affective stimuli.3,30

4. Clinical and imaging studies in children with BD

The study of pediatric BD is a field of investigation that only recently became the focus of BD researchers. The clinical presentation of pediatric BD includes symptoms that can be confounded by those of other childhood disorders, mainly Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Conduct disorder. These symptoms' overlap imposes important complications regarding clinical and psychological evaluations. Pediatric BD carries high morbidity and psychosocial dysfunction because of its chronic and frequently rapid-cycling symptoms and relative treatment resistance.33 Thus, efforts have been directed towards understanding the cognitive and emotional characteristics of these children. BD children present deficits in executive functions, including attention, working memory and organization/problem solving skills, similar to adults.34,35 The emotional recognition is another area of interest to be studied in this population.

McClure et al. examined 11 BD children (mean age 13.7 years), 10 anxiety disorder children (mean age 12.9y) and 25 control subjects (mean age 13.5y) on tests of facial memory and emotion identification.36 Lifetime rates of ADHD were higher in the BD group (82%) than in the anxiety (10%) or comparison (0%) groups. Lifetime oppositional defiant disorder was present in 36% of the BD group and 50% of the anxious group and in none of the comparison subjects. Of the anxious group, 40% had comorbid MDD. All anxious and comparison subjects were medication-free; all BD subjects were receiving medication. The emotion identification task consisted of 24 photographs of adults and 24 photographs of children in both high and low intensities of happiness, sadness, anger and fear. BD patients made more errors in the identification of low-intensity faces than control and anxiety disorder subjects. They also made more errors in the recognition of child faces, over-identifying faces as angry. Furthermore, Brotman et al. showed that pediatric BD with anxiety demonstrated a bias toward recognizing threatening faces in relation to pediatric BD without anxiety.37

Voelbel et al. described that BD children had difficulties to identify emotion in faces, but they did not specify which emotion was more inaccurately identified.38

In 2004, Chang et al. assessed functional magnetic resonance imaging using cognitive and affective tasks, but the affective task was not affective emotion in faces, otherwise it was composed of pictures which were negatively or positively valenced.39 They evaluated 12 euthymic male subjects who had at least one parent with BD, children taking stimulants were asked to discontinue these medications for at least 24 hours before testing but other types of medications were not asked to be discontinued. Subjects with BD presented abnormalities in the regulation of prefrontal - subcortical circuits, as they had greater activation in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and right insula when they were viewing negatively valenced pictures, but the control group presented greater activation only in the right posterior cingulated gyrus. For positively valenced pictures, BD patients had greater activation in the bilateral caudate and thalamus, left middle/superior frontal gyrus, and left anterior cingulated cortex, whereas controls had no areas of greater activation.

Rich et al. studied amygdala dysfunction examining neural mechanisms mediating face processing.40 Compared with healthy controls (n = 21), BD adolescents (n = 22) perceived greater hostility in neutral faces and reported more fear. Furthermore, BD patients had greater activation in the left amygdale, accumbens, putamen and ventral prefrontal cortex when rating face hostility and greater activation in the left amygdala and bilateral accumbens when rating their fear of the face. There were no between-group differences in the non emotional conditions. These results were consistent with prior studies in adult BD patients.27

Dickstein et al. showed that pediatric BD subjects have reduced memory for emotional faces, particularly on fearful faces.41 Besides, fMRI analyses showed that these patients, compared to a control group, had increased activation in the striatum and anterior cingulated cortex when successfully encoding happy faces and in the orbitofrontal cortex when successfully encoding angry faces. There were no between-group differences in neural activation during fearful face encoding. A study conducted by Nelson et al. showed that healthy adolescents displayed more activity in the subgenual anterior cingulated when viewing subsequently remembered happy faces and more activity in the right posterior hippocampus when viewing subsequently remembered neutral faces.42

Pavuluri et al. also demonstrated that medication-free BD adolescents had disturbance in prefrontal cortex affect modulation systems and atypical responses in posterior perceptual processing systems.43 BD type I patients, who were euthymic for a minimum of 4 months, presented reduced activation of right rostral ventrolateral prefrontal cortex together with increased activity in right pregenual anterior cingulated, amygdale, and paralimbic cortex in response to both angry and happy faces in relation to neutral faces. They also showed reduced activation of visual areas in occipital cortex together with greater activation in higher - order visual perceptual areas, including superior temporal sulcus and fusiform gyrus with angry faces and posterior parietal cortex with happy faces. According to the authors, disturbances in affect processing circuitry could contribute to emotional dysregulation and social cognitive difficulties in BD youth.

Schenkel et al. showed that deficits in emotion processing could be considered state of illness and trait-related of illness, because both children with PBD medicated and clinically stabilized, and unmedicated patients in acute phase had impairment in the ability to correctly identify emotionally intense happy and sad facial expressions, tending to misjudge extreme facial expressions as being moderate to mild in intensity.44 However, only unmedicated group performed more poorly than healthy subjects to differentiate subtle variations of happy or sad expressions.

Rich et al. evaluated children with narrow phenotype BD (i.e., history of at least one hypomanic or manic episode with euphoric mood) and children with severe mood dysregulation (i.e., chronic irritability and hyperarousal without episodes of mania) in a task of emotional recognition which presented gradients from 100% neutrality to 100% emotional expression.45 They found that both patient groups needed significantly more clear expressions of emotion than controls to label faces correctly.

Finally, Brotman et al. confirmed their hypothesis that children with family history of BD would have facial emotion processing deficits similar to those seen in pediatric BD.46 Compared with the control group, both the BD and at-risk groups made more errors in identifying emotions in child and adult faces. It means that deficits in facial emotional labeling may be a risk marker for developing bipolar disorder in the future. The authors propose that these deficits may be considered as an endophenotype of the disease since they are also presented in the unaffected relatives of BD patients.

 

Discussion

BD patients, even during remission, have psychosocial problems caused not only by residual symptoms, but also by cognitive deficits and difficulties to recognize emotions in human faces.

The literature presents a variation of results concerning facial emotion perception in BD. The comparison between schizophrenic and mood disorder patients demonstrated that schizophrenic patients were less accurate in recognition emotions than BD or MDD.

MDD patients seem to present deficits of facial emotion labelling comparable to those found in right-hemisphere lesion patients.19,20 However, the theory about right hemisphere impairment does not explain all cognitive deficits found in BD.47

Right hemisphere is dominant in the perception of affect. This was demonstrated using the chimeric face task, in which subjects were asked to determine which was the happier of two composite facial photographs, and it reliably elicited a RH advantage. David and Cutting13 and Kucharska-Pietura and David20 found that manic patients showed greater LH bias than healthy controls; depressives (predominantly unipolar) showed reduced LH bias compared to healthy controls; schizophrenia showed no bias to either side. They interpret this finding as suggestive of RH hyperfunction in mania and RH hypofunction in depression and schizophrenia. This result showed that the notion of a stable RH dysfunction or 'lesion' in BD is inconsistent and can be dependent of mood states.47

Two studies showed that BD patients did not have problems to recognize faces, but they were impaired on a task of facial affect labelling, specifically, they were less accurate in recognizing fear, even in euthymia.23,24 In mania, they have an impaired capacity to recognize fear and disgust,21 and when euthymic, they recognized disgust better than when manic.22

BD children presented a trend to misjudge extreme facial expressions as being moderated or mild in intensity. It is important to consider that these deficits are associated with psychosocial impairments and subsequently they should be evaluated in interventional studies.40,44

Follow-up studies re-testing the patients after recovery or testing manic and depressive patients during euthymia are needed. These studies can better investigate if these abnormalities in emotion recognition reflect a state or trait marker of mood disorder.

Another interesting point is to consider that research groups have used a number of different designs and tasks to evaluate cognitive and emotional performance in BD patients. Standardizing test designs is essential for making results comparisons possible. Furthermore, performing accurately on tests of facial affect requires a compilation of attentional, executive and emotional abilities, making it difficult to determine whether the key deficit is in fact the processing of facial expressions.27 Besides, some studies evaluated small samples (less than 10 subjects in one of the samples), which impairs the generalization of the conclusions.19,21,29,32

Imaging studies were difficult to compare due to different patient group selection and designs applied. The involvement of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and amygdala in the pathophysiology of BD was strengthened in many studies: three of them found an increased left amygdala response to fear,27,31 even in children;38 and three studies showed that depressed and euthymic BD patients presented overactivation in amygdala in response to positive affective stimuli.3,30,39 However, Foland et al. showed that patients in mania presented reduced VLPFC regulation of amygdala response during the emotion labelling task, what could explain the reductions in the inhibitory frontal activity with impact in behaviour and social life.29

A potential limitation in the literature is the impact of psychotropic medications on cognition, specifically on the perception of emotion. Venn et al. showed that among healthy subjects, administration of benzodiazepine impairs cognition of anger, administration of propranolol leads to increase in reaction time to recognize sadness, and administration of citalopram and reboxetine reduces perception of negative expressions.24 It is plausible that other pharmacological agents could have an effect on the neurocircuits underlying some of the different facial affects and this has to be verified in future studies in BD patients.

 

Conclusion

Despite the methodological deficits found in the literature, the findings allow important conclusions. The deficits found in BD patients can be differentiated from those found in other psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia and MDD. Facial emotion deficits were less severe in BD than in schizophrenia. Furthermore, affective and cognitive deficits vary according to the mood states. Several studies relate a possible positive bias in mania to enhanced recognition of specific emotions, such as fear and disgust.

Future studies should aim at standardizing task designs and differentiating deficits in different mood-associated stages of the disorder. A suggestion would be to examine patients first in euthymia and prospectively when in full episode of depression and/or mania. Another suggestion would be the follow-up of at-risk individuals, such as offspring of BD patients, which may help to define an endophenotype for this disorder.

 

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by a generous donation from the Thompson Motta family.

 


Click to extend

 

References

1. Ekman P, Friesen WV. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971;17(2):124-9.         [ Links ]

2. Gosselin P, Kirouac G. Decoding facial emotional prototypes. Can J Exp Psychol. 1995;49(3):313-29.         [ Links ]

3. Lawrence N, Williams A, Surguladze S, Giampetro V, Brammer M, Andrew C, Frangou S, Ecker C, Phillips M. Subcortical and ventral prefrontal cortical neural responses to facial expressions distinguish patients with bipolar disorder and major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55(6):578-87.         [ Links ]

4. Kohler C, Turner T, Bilker W, Brensinger C, Siegel S, Kanes S, Gur R, Gur R. Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(10):1768-74.         [ Links ]

5. Adolphs R. The neurobiology of social cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;11(2):231-9.         [ Links ]

6. Phillips ML, Young AW, Scott SK, Calder AJ, Andrew C, Giampietro V, Williams SC, Bullmore ET, Bramer M, Gray JA. Neural responses to facial and vocal expressions of fear and disgust. Proc Biol Sci. 1998;265(1408):1809-17.         [ Links ]

7. Gur RC, Schroeder L, Turner Y, McGrath C, Chan RM, Turetsky BI, Alsop D, Maldjian J, Gur RE. Brain activation during emotional processing. Neuroimage. 2002;16(3 Pt 1):651-62.         [ Links ]

8. Rocca CC, Lafer B. Neuropsychological disturbances in bipolar disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;28(3):226-37.         [ Links ]

9. Malhi GS, Ivanovski B, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Mitchell PB, Vieta E, Sachdev P. Neuropsychological deficits and functional impairment in bipolar depression, hypomania and euthymia. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(1-2):114-25.         [ Links ]

10. Martínez-Arán A, Vieta E, Colom F, Torrent C, Sanchez-Moreno J, Reinares M, Benabarre A, Goikolea JM, Brugue E, Daban C, Salamero M. Cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients: implications for clinical and functional outcome. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(3):224-32.         [ Links ]

11. de Almeida Rocca CC, de Macedo-Soares MB,, Gorenstein C, Tamada RS, Issler CK, Dias RS, Schwartzmann AM, Lafer B. Social dysfunction in bipolar disorder: pilot study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008;42(8):686-92.         [ Links ]

12. Bowers D, Blonder LX, Feinberg T, Heilman KM. Differential impact of right and left hemisphere lesions on facial emotion and object imagery. Brain. 1991;114(6):2593-609.         [ Links ]

13. David AS, Cutting JC. Affect, Affective Disorder and Schizophrenia. A Neuropsychological investigation of right hemisphere function. Br J Psychiatry. 1990;156:491-5.         [ Links ]

14. Bellack A, Blanchard J, Mueser K. Cue availability and affect perception in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(3):535-44.         [ Links ]

15. Addington J, Addington D. Facial affect recognition and information processing in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res. 1998;32(3):171-81.         [ Links ]

16. Lior R. Impairments in judgement of chimeric faces by schizophrenic and affective patients. Int J Neurosci. 1999;97(3-4):185-209.         [ Links ]

17. Loughland C, Wlliams L, Gordon E. Schizophrenia and affective disorder show different visual scanning behaviour for faces: a trait versus state-based distinction? Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52(4): 338-48.         [ Links ]

18. Vaskinn A, Sundet K, Friis S, Simonsen C, Birkenaes AB, Engh JA, Jónsdóttir H, Ringen PA, Opjordsmoen S, Andreassen OA. The effect of gender on emotion perception in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;116(4):263-70.         [ Links ]

19. Rubinow DR, Post RM. Impaired recognition of affect in facial expression in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry. 1992;31(9): 947-53.         [ Links ]

20. Kucharska-Pietura K, David A. The perception of emotional chimeric faces in patients with depression, mania and unilaterial brain damage. Psychol Med. 2003;33(4):739-45.         [ Links ]

21. Lembke A, Ketter TA. Impaired recognition of facial emotion in mania. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(2):302-4.         [ Links ]

22. Harmer CJ, Grayson L, Goodwin GM. Enhanced recognition of disgust in bipolar illness. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51(4):298-304.         [ Links ]

23. Getz G, Shear P, Strakowski S. Facial affect recognition in bipolar disorder. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003;9(4):623-32.         [ Links ]

24. Venn H, Gray J, Montangne B, Murray L, Burt M, Frigerio E, Perett D, Young A. Perception of facial expressions of emotion in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(4):286-93.         [ Links ]

25. Bora E, Vahip S, Gonul A, Akdeniz M, Ogut M, Eryavuz A. Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psych Scand. 2005;112(2):110-6.         [ Links ]

26. Bozikas VP, Tonia T, Fokas K, Karavatos A, Kosmidis MH. Impaired emotion processing in remitted patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2006;91(1):53-6.         [ Links ]

27. Yurgelun-Todd DA, Gruber SA, Kanayama G, Killgore WD, Baird AA, Young AD. FMRI during affect discrimination in bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2000;2(3 Pt 2):237-48.         [ Links ]

28. Lennox BR, Jacob R, Calder AJ, Lupson V, Bullmore E. Behavioural and neurocognitive responses to sad facial affect are attenuated in patients with mania. Psychol Med. 2004;34(5):795-802.         [ Links ]

29. Foland LC, Altshuler LL, Bookheimer SY, Eisenberger N, Townsend J, Thompson PM. Evidence for deficient modulation of amygdale response by prefrontal cortex in bipolar mania. Psychiatry Res. 2008;162(1):27-37.         [ Links ]

30. Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Sachdev P, Mitchell PB, Ivanovski B, Parker GB. Cognitive generation of affect in hypomania. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(4):271-85.         [ Links ]

31. Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Perminder S, Ivanovski B, Shnier R, Ketter T. Is a lack of disgust something to fear? A functional magnetic resonance imaging facial emotion recognition study in euthymic bipolar disorder patients. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(4):345-57.         [ Links ]

32. Chen C, Lennox B, Jacob R, Calder A, Lupson V, Bisbrown-Chippendale R, Suckling J, Bullmore E. Explicit and implicit facial affect recognition in manic and depressed states of bipolar disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(1):31-9.         [ Links ]

33. Geller B, Zimerman B, Williams M, Bolhofner K, Craney JL, DelBello MP, Soutullo, CA. Diagnostic characteristics of 93 cases of a prepubertal and early adolescent bipolar disorder phenotype by gender, puberty and comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2000;10(3):157-64.         [ Links ]

34. Dickstein DP, Treland JE, Snow J, McClure EB, Mehta MS, Towbin KE, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Neuropsychological performance in pediatric bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;55(1):32-9.         [ Links ]

35. Pavuluri MN, O'Connor MM, Harral EM, Moss M, Sweeney JA. Impact of neurocognitive function on academic difficulties in pediatric bipolar disorder: a clinical translation. Biol Psychiatry. 2006, 60(9):951-6.         [ Links ]

36. McClure E, Pope K, Hoberman A, Pine D, Leibenluft E. Facial Expression recognition in adolescents with mood and anxiety disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(6):1172-4.         [ Links ]

37. Brotman MA, Rich BA, Schmajuk M, Reising M, Monk CS, Dickstein DP, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Attention bias to threat faces in children with bipolar disorder and comorbid lifetime anxiety disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(6):819-21.         [ Links ]

38. Voelbel G, Bates M, Pandina G, Hendren R. Neuropsychological functioning of children diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Poster presented at Fifth International Conference on Bipolar Disorder, June 12-14: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 2003         [ Links ]

39. Chang K, Adleman NE, Dienes K, Simeonova DI, Menon V, Reiss A. Anomalous prefrontal-subcortical activation in familial pediatric bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(8):781-92.         [ Links ]

40. Rich BA, Vinton DT, Roberson-Nay R, Hommer RE, Berghorst LH, McClure EB, Fromm SJ, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Limbic Hyperactivation during processing of neutral facial expressions in children with bipolar disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(23):8900-5.         [ Links ]

41. Dickstein DP, Rich BA, Roxann R, Berghorst L, Vinton D, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Neural activation during encoding of emotional faces in pediatric bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(7):679-92.         [ Links ]

42. Nelson EE, McClure EB, Monk CS, Zarahn E, Leibenluft E, Pine DS, Ernst M. Developmental differences in neuronal engagement during implicit encoding of emotional faces: an event-related fMRI study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44(7):1015-24.         [ Links ]

43. Pavuluri MN, O'Connor MM, Harral EM, Sweeney JA. Affective neural circuitry during facial emotion processing in pediatric bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62(2):158-67.         [ Links ]

44. Schenkel LS, Pavuluri MN, Herbener ES, Harral EM, Sweeney JA. Facial emotion processing in acutely ill and euthymic patients with pediatric bipolar disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;46(8):1070-9.         [ Links ]

45. Rich BA, Grimley ME, Schmajuk M, Blair KS, Blair RJ, Leibenluft E. Face emotion labeling deficits in children with bipolar disorder and severe mood dysregulation. Dev Psychopathol. 2008;20(2):529-46.         [ Links ]

46. Brotman MA, Guyer AE, Lawson ES, Horsey SE, Rich BA, Dickstein DP, Pine DS, Leibnluft E. Facial emotion labeling deficits in children and adolescents at risk for bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):385-9.         [ Links ]

47. Bearden CE, Hoffman KM, Cannon TD. The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: a critical review. Bipolar Disord. 2001;3(3):106-50.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Cristiana Castanho de Almeida Rocca
Serviço de Psicologia e Neuropsicologia do Instituto de Psiquiatria do
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo
Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 785
05403-010 São Paulo, SP, Brasil
Phone: (+55 11) 3069-6274
E-mail: crisrocca@uol.com.br

Submitted: January 6, 2009
Accepted: March 16, 2009

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License