versión impresa ISSN 1516-4446
Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. vol.34 no.1 São Paulo mar. 2012
A imobilidade tônica peritraumática está associada aos sintomas do transtorno de estresse pós-traumático em estudantes brasileiros de graduação
Liana Catarina L. PortugalI; Mirtes Garcia PereiraI; Rita de Cássia S. AlvesI; Gisella TavaresI; Isabela LoboI; Vanessa Rocha-RegoII; Carla Marques-PortellaII; Mauro V. MendlowiczI; Evandro S. CoutinhoIII; Adriana FiszmanII; Eliane VolchanII; Ivan FigueiraII; Letícia de OliveiraI
IUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil
IIUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
IIIFundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Brazil
OBJECTIVE: Tonic immobility is a defensive reaction occurring under extreme life threats. Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reporting peritraumatic tonic immobility show the most severe symptoms and a poorer response to treatment. This study investigated the predictive falue of tonic immobility for posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample.
METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight college students exposed to various life threatening events were selected to participate. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Civilian Version (PCL-C) and tonic immobility questions were used. Linear regression models were fitted to investigate the association between peritraumatic tonic immobility and PCL-C scores. Peritraumatic dissociation, peritraumatic panic reactions, negative affect, gender, type of trauma, and time since trauma were considered as confounding variables.
RESULTS: We found significant association between peritraumatic tonic immobility and PTSD symptoms in a non-clinical sample exposed to various traumas, even after regression controlled for confounding variables (β = 1.99, p = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: This automatic reaction under extreme life threatening stress, although adaptive for defense, may have pathological consequences as implied by its association with PTSD symptoms.
Descriptors: Posttraumatic stress disorder; Tests/Interviews-Psychometric; Community mental health (Public health); Other research areas (Tonic immobility); Other Patient Groups/ Issues (Non-clinical sample).
OBJETIVO: A imobilidade tônica é uma resposta defensiva que ocorre sob ameaça extrema à vida. Pacientes com transtorno de estresse pós-traumático (TEPT) que relatam imobilidade tônica peritraumática são os que apresentam os sintomas mais graves e a pior resposta ao tratamento. Este estudo investigou o valor preditivo da imobilidade tônica para os sintomas de TEPT em uma amostra não clínica.
MÉTODOS: Os participantes da pesquisa foram 198 estudantes universitários expostos a traumas diversos. A versão brasileira do Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civilian Version (PCL-C) e questões referentes à imobilidade tônica foram empregadas. Modelos de regressão linear foram utilizados para investigar a associação dos sintomas de estresse pós-traumático com a imobilidade tônica peritraumática. Foram consideradas como variáveis de confusão a dissociação peritraumática, as reações físicas de pânico peritraumática, o traço de afeto negativo, o gênero, o tipo de trauma e o tempo de trauma.
RESULTADOS: Encontrou-se uma associação significativa entre a imobilidade tônica peritraumática e os sintomas de TEPT em uma amostra não clínica exposta a traumas diversos mesmo quando controlada por variáveis de confusão (β = 1,99; p = 0,017).
CONCLUSÕES: Esta reação defensiva que ocorre sob intensa ameaça, apesar de adaptativa para a defesa, pode ter consequências patológicas como sugere sua associação aos sintomas de TEPT.
Descritores: Transtorno de estresse pós-traumático; Testes psicométricos; Saúde mental da comunidade (Saúde pública); Outras áreas de pesquisa (Imobilidade tônica); Outros grupos de pacientes/questões (Amostra não clínica).
A considerable number of research studies have attempted to identify factors associated with the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after exposure to traumatic events,1 as it may give clues to new targets for prevention and treatment of trauma-related disorders. Reactions occurring at the time of a traumatic event and shortly thereafter (e.g., peritraumatic responses) are well established risk factors for psychopathological outcomes. Peritraumatic dissociation, in particular, has been associated with the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms in survivors of natural disaster, combat veterans, victims of motor vehicle accidents, and physical trauma survivors.2-5 In fact, an influent meta-analysis by Ozer et al.6 found peritraumatic dissociation to be the strongest predictor of PTSD or of its symptoms among several variables, such as trauma characteristics prior exposure and adjustment, or concurrent psychopathology. Some studies have also highlighted the importance of peritraumatic panic reactions in explaining PTSD development.7,8
Tonic immobility, a far less investigated peritraumatic reaction in humans, has been studied in animals for over three centuries.9-11Tonic immobility is characterized by reversible immobility, analgesia, and relative unresponsiveness to external stimulation elicited in a context of inescapable threat.12-14 Its adaptive value is supported by the fact that the absence of movement increases the odds that a captured animal will escape, as the predator may loosen its grip if it assumes that the prey is indeed dead.15,16 This response is considered the last-ditch defense against entrapment by a predator within a sequence of defensive responses, namely freeze, flight, fight, and tonic immobility.17 Tonic immobility is different from freezing behavior, which occurs early in the encounter stage of the defensive reflex. Freezing is an initial response during which the animal stops moving to avoid detection and shifts resources to locate the predator and is associated with increased responsivity to stimuli and alert posture.18-21 Freezing was shown to occur in humans when confronted with a potential threat (pictures of injured people) through objectively measuring the body sway, and it is accompanied by bradichardia.22,23 Tonic immobility, on the other hand, was shown to involve motionless posture along with accelerated heart rate under very high threat (Volchan et al., submitted).
Early studies of tonic immobility in humans have focused on female victims of sexual assault.24 Further studies found that tonic immobility predicts posttraumatic stress symptoms in non-clinical and clinical female victims of sexual assault.24-26 Our group recently investigated mixed-gender samples exposed to urban violence and found that peritraumatic tonic immobility predicted both the severity of posttraumatic stress symptoms and a poor response to pharmacological treatment in PTSD patients.27-29
The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between peritraumatic tonic immobility and post-traumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample exposed to a broad variety of traumatic events. Studies carried out with non-clinical samples present many advantages given that they reduce the biases of more severe cases, higher prevalence of comorbidities, medication and higher levels of functional impairment, which are seen in clinical samples. We hypothesized that, even in a relatively healthy group exposed to life threatening events, peritraumatic tonic immobility would predict the severity of symptoms after controlling for confounders, particularly peritraumatic dissociation, peritraumatic panic reaction, negative affect, type of trauma, gender, and time since trauma. By controlling for these variables we aimed to seek a unique relationship between tonic immobility and posttraumatic stress symptoms.
All participants (n = 338) were undergraduate students from Universidade Federal Fluminense. Participants who failed to fully complete the questionnaire battery and who did not meet the Criterion A1 of the DSM-IV for PTSD were excluded. The final sample was composed of 198 young adults, predominantly women (80%), aged 18-52 years (M = 20.3; SD = 2.93).
Questionnaires were distributed in classrooms, and volunteers had one hour to complete them. Posttraumatic stress symptoms were assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C; translated and adapted to Portuguese by Berger and collaborators).30,31 PCL-C is a 17-item self-report measure of the severity of intrusive, avoidance, and hyperarousal symptoms experienced in response to a stressful life event. Using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 5 = extremely), participants rated the extent to which each symptom has bothered them in the past month. At the beginning of the PCL-C, the volunteers had to describe the index trauma to which the symptoms were rated. The question was: What was the most severe traumatic event in your life?
Our evaluation of peritraumatic tonic immobility was based on the Tonic Immobility Scale Child Abuse Form (TIS-C).32 To avoid item overlap with other peritraumatic reactions, a four-item measure of motor aspects of tonic immobility was used: (i) rate the degree to which you were frozen or paralyzed during the event (from 0 = not at all frozen or paralyze; to 6 = completely frozen or paralyzed); (ii) rate the degree to which you were unable to move even though not restrained during the event (from 0 = could move freely; to 6 = could not move at all); (iii) rate the degree to which you were unable to call out or scream during the event (from 0 = could scream freely; to 6 = could not scream at all); (iv) rate the extent to which you felt unable to escape during the event (from 0 = could escape easily; to 6 = could not escape at all but remain "fixed"). Peritraumatic dissociation was assessed using the Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire (PDEQ; translated and adapted to Portuguese by Fiszman and collaborators).33,34 For each of the 10 items of the PDEQ, the subject was asked to rate in a 5-point Likert scale the extent to which he/she had experienced each dissociative phenomenon during or immediately after trauma exposure. The Physical Reactions Subscale (PRS)35 was used to measure peritraumatic panic reactions. Ten items measured on a four-point Likert-type scale assess the intensity of physical symptoms experienced during the traumatic event. The negative affect trait was measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Trait Version (PANAS-T).36 The PANAS is a 20-item scale consisting of 10 adjectives that describe negative and positive mood traits. In order to evaluate the number of types of life-threatening trauma exposure, the Trauma History Questionnaire (THQ; translated and adapted to Portuguese by Fiszman and col-laborators)37,38 was used. The THQ is a list of 23 potentially traumatic events, including crime, disaster, and physical and sexual assaults. It also contains an open-ended question for specifying other extraordinarily stressful situations or events.
Means and standard deviation were calculated for psychometric scales. Linear regression models were fitted to investigate the association between peritraumatic tonic immobility (independent variable) and PCL-C scores (dependent variable). Potential confounders were sequentially included in the model according to their impact on the magnitude of the linear coefficient, and p-values equal or less than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.
This study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Federal Fluminense University (Niteroi, Brazil) and the process number of the Research Committee approval is 203/09. The 338 undergraduate students provided written informed consent before assessment.
The most traumatic life events reported for completing the PCL-C included death/loss of someone close to you (n = 64), violent crime (n = 50), medical causes (n = 45), vehicle accident (n = 17), child abuse (n = 5), domestic violence (n = 5), injury (n = 5), natural disaster (n = 2), and others (n = 5). The mean scores of our sample were 29.7 (SD = 10.9, min = 17, max = 70) for posttraumatic stress symptoms; 8.9 (SD = 6.9, min = 0, max = 24) for tonic immobility questions; 18.7 (SD = 20.7) for physical reactions subscale; 20.7 (SD = 7.99) for peritraumatic dissociative experiences questionnaire; and 22.7 (SD = 6.10) for negative affect. And the number of traumatic events was 5.2 (SD = 2.29).
Peritraumatic dissociation and panic reactions were strongly associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms (β = 5.0, p < 0.001 and β = 3.6, p < 0.001, respectively), indicating that these reactions may be considered as confounders for the association between peritraumatic tonic immobility and PCL-C scores.
Table 1 shows raw and adjusted associations between peritraumatic tonic immobility and PCL-C scores. When analyzed without controlling for confounders, higher scores of tonic immobility were associated with higher scores of posttraumatic stress symptoms (step 1, β = 4.8, p < 0.001). After controlling for other peritraumatic reactions, negative affect, gender, time since trauma and type of trauma (step 5), the magnitude of the coefficient was reduced by almost 60% (β = 1.99), but the association remained statistically significant (p = 0.017).
As far as we know, this study was the first to show a significant association between peritraumatic tonic immobility and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample experiencing various types of trauma. The importance of these results is two-fold: First, the study was conducted in a relatively healthy sample minimizing confounding factors such as comorbidities and medication. Second, peritraumatic tonic immobility predicts posttraumatic stress symptoms even after controlling for confounders, especially peritraumatic dissociation and peritraumatic panic reactions, which are well established risk factors for PTSD.
Studies using laboratory animal models revealed that although tonic immobility decreases the likelihood of being killed on the spot, it may have hazardous long-run consequences, including death in some cases.39 In humans, peritraumatic tonic immobility in some contexts may increase the chances of survival,40 while in others it may fail to be protective.41 Also, humans experiencing this reaction may exhibit unfavorable outcomes. Previous studies from our group in clinical samples showed that peritraumatic tonic immobility predicted both symptom severity and poor treatment outcome in PTSD patients.27-29 So it was not surprising to find that peritraumatic tonic immobility is a predictor of posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample. This finding implies that trauma victims who react with tonic immobility are at high risk for developing PTSD. Secondary prevention of PTSD is an important goal for public health. The present study suggests that screening for tonic immobility in the aftermath of a traumatic event may help to identify victims in need for early therapeutic intervention. Also, the present study adds evidence that the occurrence of tonic immobility under traumatic events is far from rare in humans. Information about this involuntary defensive strategy to life-threatening events should be spread to the general public. Knowledge about this "natural" reaction has the power to alleviate shame and guilt of being immobile during a trauma.
This study has some limitations that need to be addressed. First, the retrospective design may have predisposed the participants to biased recall. Second, data were cross-sectional, thus precluding determination of whether peritraumatic tonic immobility reactions caused PTSD symptoms. Finally, trauma measures did not assess criterion A2 for PTSD (fear, helplessness, and horror in response to target events).
In summary, our data suggest that tonic immobility reaction is a relevant phenomenon for PTSD. Peritraumatic tonic immobility was significantly associated with posttraumatic stress symptoms in a non-clinical sample exposed to a variety of traumas, even after controlling for potential confounders.
Future research should employ multimodal assessment of peritraumatic tonic immobility reactions using laboratory tasks and psychophysiological measurements in order to further investigate its association with PTSD symptoms.
We would like to thank Sonia Gleiser for administrative support and José Magalhães for technical support. This research was supported by Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Partial support was also provided by grants from IBNNet/FINEP, Millennium Institute (Grant number 420122/2005-2), and Confederação Nacional do Comércio.
1. Brewin CR, Andrews B, Valentine JD. Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(5):748-66. [ Links ]
2. Koopman C, Classen C, Spiegel D. Predictors of posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of the Oakland/Berkeley, Calif., firestorm. Am . Psychiatry. 1994;151(6):888-94. [ Links ]
3. Marmar CR, Weiss DS, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA, Jordan BK, Kulka RA, Hough, RL. Peritraumatic Dissociation and Posttraumatic Stress in Male Vietnam Theater Veterans. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:902-7. [ Links ]
4. Ursano RJ, Fullerton, CS, Epstein RS, Crowley B, Vance K, Kao TC, Baum A. Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress disorder following motor vehicle accidents. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1808-10. [ Links ]
5. Michaels AJ, Michaels CE, Moon CH, Smith JS, Zimmerman MA, Taheri PA, Peterson C. Posttraumatic stress disorder after injury: impact on general health outcome and early risk assessment. J Trauma. 1999;47(3):460-6. [ Links ]
6. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, Weiss DS. Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(1):52-73. [ Links ]
7. Bracha HS, Williams AE, Haynes SN, Kubany ES, Ralston TC, Yamashita JM. The STRS (shortness of breath, tremulousness, racing heart, and sweating): A brief checklist for acute distress with panic-like autonomic indicators; development and factor structure. Ann Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;3:8. [ Links ]
8. Lawyer SR, Resnick HS, Galea S, Ahern, J, Kilpatrick, DG, Vlahov D. Predictors of peritraumatic reactions and PTSD following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Psychiatry. 2006;69(2):130-41. [ Links ]
9. Maser JD, Gallup GG. Tonic immobility and related phenomena-partially annotated, tricentennial bibliography,1936 to 1976. Psychol Rec. 1977;27:177-217. [ Links ]
10. Oliveira L, Hoffmann A, Menescal-de-Oliveira L. Participation of the medial and anterior hypothalamus in the modulation of tonic immobility in guinea pigs. Physiol Behav. 1997;62:1171-8. [ Links ]
11. Monassi CR, Leite-Panissi CRA, Menescal-de-Oliveira L. Ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter and the control of tonic immobility. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50:201-8. [ Links ]
12. Menescal-de-Oliveira L, Hoffmann A. The parabrachial region, a possible substrate shared by the systems that modulate pain and tonic immobility. Behav Brain Res. 1993;56:127-32. [ Links ]
13. Leite-Panissi CRA, Coimbra NC, Menescal-de-Oliveira, L. The cholinergic stimulation of the central amygdala modifying the tonic immobility response and antinociception in guinea pigs depends on the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Brain Res Bull. 2003;60:167-78 [ Links ]
14. Leite-Panissi CRA, Rodrigues CL, Brantegani MR, Menescalde-Oliveira l. Endogenous opiate analgesia induced by tonic immobility in guinea pigs. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001;34:245-50. [ Links ]
15. Gallup Jr GG. Tonic Immobility as a measure of fear in domestic fowl. Anim Behav. 1979;20:166-9 [ Links ]
16. Gilman TT, Marcuse F. Animal hypnosis. Psychol Bull. 1949;46:151-65. [ Links ]
17. Ratner SC. In: Gordon JE, editor. Handbook of clinical and experimental hypnosis New York: Macmillan; 1967. [ Links ]
18. Marks IM. Fears, phobias, and rituals: panic, anxiety, and their disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. [ Links ]
19. Borelli KG, Nobre MJ, Brandão ML, Coimbra Nc. Effects of acute and chronic fluoxetine and diazepam on freezing behavior induced by electrical stimulation of dorsolateral and lateral columns of the periaqueductal gray matter. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004; 77:557-66. [ Links ]
20. Vianna DM, Graeff FG, Brandão ML, Landeira-Fernandez J. Defensive freezing evoked by electrical stimulation of the periaqueductal gray: comparison between dorsolateral and ventrolateral regions. Neuroreport. 2001;12:4109-12. [ Links ]
21. Fendt M, Fanselow MS. The neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of conditioned fear. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23(5):743-60. [ Links ]
22. Azevedo TM, Volchan E, Imbiriba LA, Rodrigues EC, Oliveira JM, Oliveira LF, Lutterbach LG, Vargas CD. A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(3):255-60. [ Links ]
23. Facchinetti LD, Imbiriba LA, Azevedo TM, Vargas CD, Volchan E. Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neurosci Lett. 2006;410(1):52-6. [ Links ]
24. Heidt JM, Marx BP, Forsyth JP. Tonic immobility and childhood sexual abuse: a preliminary report evaluating the sequela of rape-induced paralysis. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(9):1157-71. [ Links ]
25. Bovin MJ, Jager-Hyman S, Gold SD, Marx BP, Sloan DM. Tonic immobility mediates the influence of peritraumatic fear and perceived inescapability on posttraumatic stress symptom severity among sexual assault survivors. J Trauma Stress. 2008;21(4):402-9. [ Links ]
26. Humphreys KL, Sauder CL, Martin EK, Marx BP. Tonic immobility in childhood sexual abuse survivors and its relationship to posttraumatic stress symptomatology. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25(2):358-73. [ Links ]
27. Rocha-Rego V, Fiszman A, Portugal LC, Garcia PM, de OL, Mendlowicz MV, Marques-Portella C, Berger W, Freire Coutinho ES, Mari JJ, Figueira I, Volchan E. Is tonic immobility the core sign among conventional peritraumatic signs and symptoms listed for PTSD? J Affect Disord. 2009;115(1-2):269-73. [ Links ]
28. Fiszman A, Mendlowicz MV, Marques-Portella C, Volchan E, Coutinho ES, Souza WF, Rocha V, Lima AA, Salomao FP, Mari JJ, Figueira I. Peritraumatic tonic immobility predicts a poor response to pharmacological treatment in victims of urban violence with PTSD. J Affect Disord. 2008;107 (1-3):193-97. [ Links ]
29. Lima AA, Fiszman A, Marques-Portella C, Mendlowicz MV, Coutinho ES, Maia DC, Berger W, Rocha-Rego V, Volchan E, Mari JJ, Figueira I. The impact of tonic immobility reaction on the prognosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2010;44(4):224-8. [ Links ]
30. Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane, TM. The PTSD checklist (PCL): Reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies; 1993 Oct 24-7; San Antonio, TX. USA [ Links ]
31. Berger W, Mendlowicz MV, Souza WF, Figueira I. Equivalência Semântica da Versão em Português da Post-Traumatic Checklist Civilian Version (PCL-C) para rastreamento do Transtorno de Estresse Pós-Traumático. R Psiquiatr RS. 1994;26(2):167-75. [ Links ]
32. Fusé T, Forsyth JP, Marx B, Gallup GG, Weaver S. Factor structure of the Tonic Immobility Scale in female sexual assault survivors: an exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(3):265-83. [ Links ]
33. Marmar CR, Weiss D, Metzler T. Peritraumatic dissociative experiences questionnaire. In: Bremner JD, Marmar CR, editors. Trauma, Memory, and Dissociation. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press;1998. p. 249-52. [ Links ]
34. Fiszman A, Marques-portella C, Berger W, Volchan E, Oliveira L, Coutinho E, Mendlowicz M, Figueira I. Adaptação transcultural para o português do instrumento Peritraumatic Dissociative Experiences Questionnaire, Versão Auto-Aplicativa. R Psiquiatr RS. 2005;27(2):151-8. [ Links ]
35. Resnick H (1997) Acute panic reactions among rape victims: implications for prevention of postrape psychopathology. NCP Clinical Quarterly/The National Center of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder 7:41-5. [ Links ]
36. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect - the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063-70. [ Links ]
37. Green BL. Trauma history questionnaire. In: Stamm BH, Varra EM, editors. Measurement of stress, trauma and adaptation. Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press; 1996. p. 366-8. [ Links ]
38. Fiszman A, Cabizuca M, Lanfredi C, Figueira I. The cross-cultural adaptation to Portuguese of the Trauma History Questionnaire to identify traumatic experiences. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2005;27(1):63-6. [ Links ]
39. Liberson WT, Smith RW, Stern A. Experimental studies of the prolonged "hypnotic withdrawal" in guinea pigs. J Neuropsychiatr. 1961;3:28-34. [ Links ]
40. Ripley, A. The Unthinkable: Who Survives When Disaster Strikes and Why. Paralysis: Playing dead in French Class. New York: Three Rivers Press; 2008. p. 163-78. [ Links ]
41. Leach, J. Why People 'Freeze' in an Emergency: Temporal and Cognitive Constraints on Survival Responses. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004;75(6):539-42. [ Links ]
Letícia de Oliveira
Laboratory of Neurophysiology of Behavior, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Universidade Federal Fluminense;
Rua Hernani Mello 101, São Domingos, sala 203Y
24210-130 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
Phone: (+55 21) 2629-2446 Fax: (+55 21) 2629-2414
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Received on March 1, 2011; accepted on May 6, 2011