Beak-trimming methods and their effect on the performance of japanese quail pullets (Coturnix japonica)

Beak-trimming methods and their effect on the performance of japanese quail pullets (Coturnix japonica)

Pizzolante CC^I; Garcia EA^II; Saldanha EAPB^I; Laganá C^I; Batista L^III; Deodato Ap^I; Souza ALP^IV

^IResearcher of APTA Regional / DDD / SAA, Brotas – SP, CP 09, Cep 17.380-000. [e-mail]

^IIProfessor of the Dept. Animal Production of FMVZ – Unesp – Botucatu, SP. [e-mail]

^IIIStudent of the Post-Graduation Program in Animal Science of the School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science of UNESP – Botucatu, SP

^IVZootecnista

^{Mail Address}

ABSTRACT

This study aimed at verifying if beak-trimming methods in Japanese quail pullets could optimize production by decreasing stress caused by cannibalism. A total number of 816 day-old Japanese quails was distributed in a completely randomized experimental design in a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement, with two beak-trimming ages (14 and 21 days of age) and three beak-trimming sizes (not trimmed, 1/3 trimmed, or 1/2 trimmed), and 4 replicates of 34 birds per replicate. Birds were submitted to the same management and feeding conditions. Weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and mortality were evaluated. There was no significant effect of age at beak trimming on the evaluated parameters (P>0.05), as well as no significant interaction between age at beak trimming, and beak-trimming method. There was a significant effect (P<0.01) of trimming size on performance, with the best performance observed in birds not submitted to beak trimming or had 1/2 of the beak trimmed. When the beak was more aggressively trimmed (1/2), parameters were worse. According to the obtained results, it is recommended to trim 1/3 of the beaks, which can be performed either at 14 or 21 days of age.

Keywords: Japanese quail, beak trimming, performance, pullet phase.

INTRODUCTION

Commercial quail production seeks at reducing production costs, and some of the commonly used management practices have raised concern in terms of bird welfare. Many of these practices may have a negative effect on the birds, interfering with the expression of their full genetic potential (Faria, 1998).

Quails, as turkeys and chickens, are prone to aggressive reactions, such as feather pecking and cannibalism, which are more evident when birds are housed in high densities.

According to Cloutier et al. (2000), beak trimming is the main method used to prevent feather pecking and cannibalism in the poultry industry, and it is commonly used in chicken and Japanese quail egg production aiming at reducing aggressive behavior, mortality, and improving productive performance. However, the real need for beak trimming quails has been questioned, and an adequate beak-trimming method for Japanese quails still needs to be determined.

On the other hand, there is consensus as to the stress caused by beak trimming (Struwe et al., 1992). An increasing number of organizations advocate that this practice should no longer be used, as it is considered cruel. However, under practical production conditions, non-trimmed birds may cause severe injuries in other birds, with consequent reduction in productivity, and increase in the mortality rate.

Beak trimming should considered as a management practice that has direct impact on flock performance and on the economic return of quail production, as it causes immediate and persistent effects on behavior, feed intake, and body weight. Beak-trimmed birds are usually less active, show less pecking behavior, eat less, and grow more slowly. These changes are primarily a consequence of sensorial loss. Oliveira (2002) observed that properly beak-trimmed quails presented better flock uniformity, lower feed waste, and good feathering, and the author recommends two trimming in the pullet phase, being the first at 12 days of age, and the second at 30 to 35 days of age. Due to the need of information on the optimal age, trimming method, and necessary care to obtain good results with the practice of beak trimming in quails, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of age and beak-trimming method on the performance of Japanese quail pullets.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total number of 816 day-old female Japanese quails was housed in a masonry house. The house was 4.0-m high, 12.0-m long, and the sides had 1.50-m walls and 1.5-m high galvanized iron mesh, and clay-tiled roof. The house contained 24 pens, specific for the starter phase. Pens measured 1.0 m², and were equipped with feeders and pressure cup drinkers. In order to provide thermal comfort to the birds, house sides were equipped with curtains. The lighting program used was 23 h light, one hour dark during the first week, and natural light until 35 days of age.

Birds were submitted to the same management and feeding conditions. Water and feed were available ad libitum. The diet was based on corn and soybean meal, and formulated according to the NRC (1994) recommendations, and the ingredient composition followed Rostagno et al. (2000). Feed is shown in Table 1.

A completely randomized experimental design was used, with a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement (two beak-trimming ages and three beak-trimming sizes) of four replicates of 34 quails each (Table 2 and Figures 1 and 2).

At the end of the experimental period, when quails were 35 days of age, the following parameters were evaluated: weight gain (WG), feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and mortality. Mortality data, in percentage, were transformed to arcsine (root (x/100 + 0.05), according to Steel & Torrie (1980). The results were submitted to analysis of variance using the GLM (General Linear Models) procedure of the SAS software (SAS Institute, 1999). Means were compared using the test of Tukey at 5% significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Maximal and minimal environmental temperatures in the house during the experimental period were 19.5 and 27.9 ºC, respectively.

The obtained results are presented in Table 3.

There was no effect of age at beak trimming on the analyzed parameters (P>0.05). Also, there was no ignificant interaction between age at beak trimming and trimmed beak size.

Analysis of variance showed significant effects only of beak trimming size (P<0.01) on weight gain and feed intake. Birds submitted to more severe beak trimming (1/2 beak) had lower feed intake, and consequently lower weight gain, as compared to those that were not submitted to beak trimming or only 1/3 of the beak was trimmed. Kuo et al. (1991), studying the effect of beak trimming on welfare and cannibalism in white layers, also observed lower feed intake and weight gain decreased in beak-trimmed birds. The authors justify these losses by the stress caused by beak trimming, which probably causes pain, and impairs feed apprehension.

Sandilands & Savory (2002) did not observe body weight differences between layers submitted or not to beak trimming, and the authors relate these results to the fact that only 1/4 of the beak was trimmed in their study, which would be much less as compared to other studies trimming 1/3 or even half of the beaks. However, most studies involving beak trimming in layers, such as those of Lee & Craig (1990) and Carrey & Lassiter (1995), showed a reduction in body weight in the period immediately after beak trimming, but the birds recovered during the following periods.

In the present experiment, feed conversion ratio was not influenced by the treatments, because the lower feed intake led to consequently lower weight gain. Conversely, Leandro et al. (2005) found worse feed conversion ratio in quails submitted to light and severe beak trimming (trimming and cauterization of 1/3 and 2/3 of the beak, respectively) as compared to non-trimmed birds.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the obtained results, it is recommended to trim 1/3 of the beaks, which can be performed either at 14 or 21 days of age.

Arrived: October / 2006

Approved: November / 2006

• Carrey JB, Lassiter BW. Influences of age at final beak trim on the productive performance of commercial layers. Poultry Science 1995; 74:615-619.
• Cloutier S, Newberry RC, Forster CT, Girsberger KM. Does pecking at inanimate stimuli predict cannibalistic behaviour in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2000; 66:119-133.
• Faria DE. Formação da poedeira moderna com ênfase nas fases de cria e recria. In: SIMPÓSIO GOIANO DE AVICULTURA, 3; 1998; Goiânia. Anais... p.53-71.
• Leandro NSM, Vieira NS, Matos MS, Café MB, Stringhini JH, Santos DA. Desempenho produtivo de codornas japonesas (Coturnix coturnix japonica) submetidas a diferentes densidades e tipos de debicagem. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences 2005; 27(1):129-135.
• Lee HY, Craig JV. Beak trimming effects on the behavior and weight gain of floor-reared, egg-strain pullets from three genetic stocks during the rearing period. Poultry Science 1990; 69:568-575.
• Kuo FL, Craig JV, Muir WM. Selection and beak trimming effects on behaviour, cannibalism, and short term production traits in White Leghorn pullets. Poultry Science 1991; 70:1057-1068.
• National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 8th rev. ed. Washington: National Academy Press; 1994.
• Oliveira BL. Manejo racional e produtividade das codornas. In: SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL DE COTURNICULTURA,1; 2002; Lavras. MG. Anais... Lavras MG: UFLA; 2002. p.77-95.
• Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donizete JL et al. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos - Composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Viçosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2000.
• Sandilands V, Savory CJ. Ontogeny of behavior in intact and beak trimmed layer pullets, with special reference to preening. British Poultry Science 2002; 43:182-189.
• SAS INSTITUTE. SAS User's guide: statistics. 5th ed. Cary; 1985.
• Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and procedures of statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980. 633 p.
• Struwe FJ, Gleaves EW, Douglas JH. Stress measurements on beak-trimmed and untrimmed pullets. Poultry Science 1992; 71:1154-1162.

Mail Address

CC Pizzolante

UPD Brotas

Cx Postal 09

17.380-000. Brotas, SP, Brasil

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  10 Apr 2007
• Date of issue
  Dec 2006

History

• Received
  Oct 2006
• Accepted
  Nov 2006