SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número2Calcium levels and limestone particle size in the diet of commercial layers at the end of the first production cycleEffects of dietary digestible lysine levels on protein and fat deposition in the carcass of broilers índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

versão impressa ISSN 1516-635Xversão On-line ISSN 1806-9061

Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. vol.11 no.2 Campinas abr./jun. 2009

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000200004 

Bioavailability comparison of free and esterified lutein for layer hens

 

 

Wu L; Huang X; Shi K; Tan R

Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, Hubei 430023, P. R. China

Mail Address

 

 


ABSTRACT

Lutein supplements are often used to pigment and enrich layer chicken eggs. This experiment was conduced to compare the bioavailability of free and esterified lutein, by depletion method. Forty chickens were randomly divided into two groups. After 2 weeks of washout period, when all birds were fed the same low lutein basal diet, the two groups were fed for another 2 weeks with diets supplemented with free lutein or esterified lutein. Two experimental diets were supplemented with the same amount of 15 mg lutein/kg. On day 0 (baseline) and days 3, 7, and 14, birds fasting morning plasma samples were collected and stored for lutein analysis by high performance liquid chromatography method (HPLC). Results showed that: 1) Plasma lutein concentration increased dramatically after feeding free or esterified lutein; 2) Plasma lutein level in birds fed the diet supplemented with free lutein significantly differed from those fed esterified lutein on day 3. 3) There were no significant differences in plasma lutein levels between free lutein and esterified lutein on days 7 and 14. In conclusion, the lutein bioavailability from free lutein or esterified lutein supplements was comparable.

Keywords: Bioavailability, depletion method, free lutein, layer hens, lutein ester.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Lutein is a group of natural pigments known as xanthophyll carotenoids without vitamin A activity, and itis mainly found in fruits, vegetables, grains, and eggs (Johnson, 2004). It has a yellow-orange color, and it has been used for many years in poultry diets as a mean to pigment egg yolks. Recent evidence suggests that lutein can be beneficial for the prevention of a wide list of human diseases (Ribaya-Mercado & Blumberg, 2004). Because lutein in egg yolk is highly bioavailable, as most of fats and fat-soluble compounds (Chung et al., 2004), and lutein content in eggs can be manipulated by the use of lutein in layer diets, it is possible to use lutein feed additives to develop lutein-enriched eggs (Leeson & Caston, 2004).

Lutein is mostly found in marigold (Tagets erecta L.), and its extraction by solvent has been used to produce lutein additives. Native marigold extracts supply more than 95% of the esterified lutein available (Breithaupt, 2002). A solvent method, following saponification, has been widely used for the extraction of free lutein from marigold (Larsen & Christensen, 2002). However, the hydroxyl groups and multiple double bonds of free lutein make it susceptible to some chemicals problems, such as saponification (Oliver et al., 1998). Furthermore, the stability of esterified lutein is superior to that of free lutein, under the same challenge of light and heat (Li et al., 2007). Since esterified fat soluble nutrients, such as vitamins A and E, are absorbed in the small intestine as free alcohol (Muller et al., 1976), it is hypothesized that lutein esters can be transformed, by lipase catalyzed hydrolysis, in free lutein, in the gut lumen, before being absorbed. However, there is little information available in literature relative to the digestion, absorption, and metabolism of lutein esters. Therefore, data regarding the bioavailability of lutein from various sources are insufficient.

This study compared the concentration of free lutein in chicken plasma after feeding free or esterified lutein by depletion method to layer hens. It may help selecting the best form of lutein to be used in the poultry industry.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hy-Line Grey commercial layers (n=40, 70-wk-old), weighing 1.6±0.2 kg, were randomly divided into two treatments, with 20 birds each. Hens were individually housed in cages measuring 0.2×0.2 m, and were submitted to a lighting program of 16 h light/day, at the Research Farm of Hubei Feed Engineering Technology Research Center. Layers were kept under a temperature of 25±5 °C. Feed and water were supplied ad libitum. Care of the animals was in accordance to the "Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching" (Guide, 1988).

After two weeks of washout period, when the hens were fed diets supplemented with the same low-lutein basal diet, two groups were fed the basal diets supplemented either with free lutein or esterified lutein for a period of two weeks. The low-lutein basal diet contained broken rice instead of yellow corn, and was formulated to meet the nutrient requirements of layers proposed by the NRC (1994). The ingredient and nutrient compositions of the basal diet are presented in Table 1. The source of free-lutein and esterified-lutein supplements were commercial premixes of marigold. Lutein contents were determined using a HPLC method, as described by Chen et al. (2004). The free-lutein and esterified-lutein supplements contained 45.9±0.4 and 7.5±0.2 g free lutein/kg, respectively. The basal diet contained 0.50±0.02 mg lutein/kg (n=3; determined as is). Other carotenoids were not detected. The two experimental diets were formulated to contain the same level of 15 mg lutein/kg. All feeds were prepared every 3 days. No feed additives were supplemented and all diets were prepared in mash form.

Fasting morning blood samples were taken on day 0 (baseline, before feeding the fortified diets), and days 3, 7, 14 for lutein analysis. The number of eggs laid by each hen was counted during the experiment. Egg production of individual hens did not change during the study. Therefore, plasma lutein levels were not corrected for individual egg production.

Blood samples were obtained by puncture of the vena ulnaris, with an EDTA-monovette. One milliliter of blood was sampled from each chicken. Immediately after collection, the plasma was separated from the erythrocytes by centrifugation (2,200 r/min, 10 min, 4 °C). The plasma was stored -20 °C, in plastic caps, and protected from light. Plasma lutein concentrations have been shown to be stable under these storage conditions (Craft et al., 1988).

The plasma samples were analyzed for free lutein as a modification of the HPLC method, as described by Chung et al. (2004). The HPLC system comprised a Waters 600S controller, Waters 1525 pump, Waters 717 autosampler, Waters 2487(dual γ absorbance) detector, and Waters XTerraRC18 column (3.9 mm×150 mm, 5µm, MS). The HPLC mobile phase was methanol: water (CH3OH:H20)(92:8, vol/vol), The column flow rate was 1 mL/min, and the column temperature was maintained at 16.4 °C, with a water jacket and a circulator.

Lutein was quantified by determining the peak area at 445 nm, in the HPLC calibrated against a known amount of standard. The lutein standard was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co (St Louis).

The limit of detection for this method is 0.245-9.8 µg lutein /mL. The precision was 1.91% (n=6). Recovery of the internal standard averaged 98.95% and the RSD was 1.08%.

All data were analyzed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS (Statistical, 2000) as a completely randomized design. Data are reported as means (±SE). All statements of significance were based on probability p<0.05.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After feeding the low-lutein basal diet for two weeks, the chickens' plasma contained only small amounts of free lutein (no detection of lutein, lower than method detection limit -0.245µg lutein /mL). These results were in agreement with the proposed experimental design, and implied that the baseline values of day 0 were set up correctly.

Three days later, after feeding the diets supplemented with lutein, plasma free lutein changed remarkably in both free-lutein and esterified-lutein fed layers (Table 2); plasma lutein concentration with the free-lutein diet was 1.90±0.17 µg lutein/mL, s higher (P<0.05) than the level of 1.47±0.13 µg lutein/mL obtained with the diet supplemented with esterified lutein. An explanation for these results might be that the dietary free lutein was absorbed easier by the gut, as compared to lutein ester, which may have needed to be hydrolyzed lutein, before it was absorbed through the intestinal wall into the blood stream.

The plasma lutein level of birds fed the diet with free lutein on day 7 did not differ (P >0.05) from day 3, but the plasma lutein levels of those fed the esterified lutein diet on day 7 differed (P <0.05) from day 3. This difference maybe is a reason of the pigmentation variation of egg yolk. However, this is not consistent with the experimental results of Bowen et al. (2002), who reported higher bioavailability from lutein ester formulation when compared to the free form, although this difference was not significant.

On day 14, there were no differences (P >0.05) of the plasma lutein values from day 7 and between both treatments. These results indicate that the plasma lutein levels of layer hens reached approximately a stable value independently of lutein dietary source, although the curves of plasma lutein level after feeding different forms of lutein were different. This might be due to deposition and excretion rates (Tyczkowski & Hamilton, 1987), because plasma analyses reflect not only intestinal absorption of dietary lutein, but also other physiological processes.

There are many reports on egg yolk pigmentation using free or originally esterified lutein. Sometimes, this is a point of controversy, each trying to justify that one form is more efficiently absorbed than the other. However, little attention has been given to the influence of the chemical form of lutein on its absorption and biological availability.

Papa et al. (1985) reported that saponification had no effect on egg yolk color. Lai et al. (1996) observed that the saponification of paprika did not affect egg yolk color as compared to a non-saponified paprika oleoresin. Galobart et al. (2004) reported that saponification of both marigold and paprika extracts improved pigmenting efficiency.

 

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, both free and esterified lutein added to a low-lutein basal diet may increase plasma lutein levels of layer hens to a comparable level. Therefore, it is suggested that esterified lutein can be used to produce lutein-enriched eggs by the poultry industry since the stability of esterified lutein is superior than that of free lutein.

 

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Educational Commission of Hubei Province of China (Project No. D20091808). The authors would like to thank X. Guo for assistance with lutein assays.

 

REFERENCES

Bowen PE, Herbst-Espinosa SM, Hussain EA, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis M.Esterification does not impair lutein bioavailability in humans. The Journal of Nutrition 2002; 132:3668-673.         [ Links ]

Breithaupt DE, Wirt U, Bamedi A. Differentiation between lutein monoester regioisomers and detection of lutein diesters from marigold flowers (Tagetes erecta L.) and several fruits by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2002; 50:66-70.         [ Links ]

Chen LS, Zhou CS, Xiang HY. Determonation of lutein in marigold flowers with high performance liquid chromatography. Chinese Journal of Spectroscopy Laboratory 2004; 21:865-8.         [ Links ]

Chung HY, Helen MR, Elizabeth JJ. Lutein bioavailability is higher fromlutein-enriched eggs than from supplements and spinach in men. The Journal of Nutrition 2004; 134:1887-93.         [ Links ]

Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in agricultural research and teaching. Champaign: National Academic Science; 1988.         [ Links ]

Craft NE, Brown ED, Smith JCJr. Effects of storage and handling conditions on concentrations of individual carotenoids, retinol, and tocopherol in plasma. Clinical Chemistry 1988; 34:44-8.         [ Links ]

Galobart J, Sala R, Ricon-Carruyo X, Manzanilla EG, Vila B, Gasa J. Egg yolk color as affected by saponification of different natural pigmenting sources. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2004; 13:328-34.         [ Links ]

Johnson EJ. A biological role of lutein. Food Reviews International 2004; 20(1):1-16.         [ Links ]

Lai SM, Gray JI, Flegal CJ. Deposition of carotenoids in eggs from hens fed diets containing saponified and unsaponified oleoresin paprika. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1996; 72:166-70.         [ Links ]

Larsen E, Christensen LP. Simple saponication method for the quantitive determination of carotenoids in green vegetable. Journal Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2002; 50:1071-2.         [ Links ]

Leeson S, Caston L. Enrichment of eggs with lutein. Poultry Science 2004; 83:1709-12.         [ Links ]

Li DJ, Fang GZ, Liu CQ, Yu JP. Stability of lutein and its esters. Chemistry and Industry of Forest Products 2007; 27(1):112-6.         [ Links ]

Muller DP, Manning JA, Mathias PM, Harries JT. Studies on the intestinal hydrolysis of tocopheryl esters. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 1976; 46:207-10.         [ Links ]

NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1994.         [ Links ]

Oliver J, Plaou A, Pon S. Semi-quantification of carotenoids by high performance liquid chromatorgraphy: saponification-induced losses in fatty foods. Journal of Chromatography A 1998; 829:393-9.         [ Links ]

Papa CM, Fletcher DL, Halloran HR. Utilization and yolk coloring capability of xanthophylls from synthetic and high xanthophyll concentrates. Poultry Science 1985; 64:1464-9.         [ Links ]

Ribaya-Mercado JD, Blumberg JB. Lutein and zeanthin and their potential roles in disease prevention. Journal of the American College Nutrition 2004; 23(6):567-87S.         [ Links ]

Statistical Analysis System Proprietary Software. Release 8.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2000.         [ Links ]

Tyczkowski JK, Hamilton PB. Metabolism of lutein dieters during aflatoxicosis in young chickens. Poultry Science 1987; 66:2011-6.         [ Links ]

 

 

Mail Address:
Lingying Wu
Wuhan Polytechnic University
Wuhan, Hubei 430023, P. R. China
Tel: +86 27 6248 3058 Fax: +86 27 8395 6175
E-mail: wuly@whpu.edu.cn

Arrived: March/2009
Approved: July/2009

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons