Services on Demand
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 1516-8034
Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. vol.16 no.1 São Paulo Jan./Mar. 2011
Marcela Maria Alves da SilvaI; Amanda Tragueta FerreiraII; Renata Resina MigliorucciI; Hugo Nari FilhoIII; Giédre Berretin-FelixIV
Program (PhD) in Applied Dental Sciences, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru,
Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Bauru (SP), Brazil
IIPostgraduate Program (Masters degree) in Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Bauru (SP), Brazil
IIIUniversidade do Sagrado Coração - USC - Bauru (SP), Brazil
IVSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology Department, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Bauru (SP), Brazil
To verifying whether orthodontic-surgical treatment results in modification
on the signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction in individuals with
METHODS: Twenty patients of both genders (ages between 15 and 44 years) with different dental-occlusion and facial characteristics, submitted to mandibular and/or maxillary osteotomy, participated in this study. All patients presented at least one sign or symptom of temporomandibular dysfunction, verified through interview and clinical evaluation carried out before and after 30 to 60 days of the orthognathic surgery. The final evaluation investigated the presence of pain on palpation of masticatory and cervical muscles, and temporomandibular joint pain; auscultation of the temporomandibular joints was performed, and jaw movements were measured.
RESULTS: All symptoms investigated in the interview decreased after the orthognathic surgery. Regarding mandibular movements, there was a significant decrease in postoperative mandibular opening, and little variation was observed in measures of lateral excursions. It was also noticed a decrease of pain in cervical muscles.
CONCLUSION: The orthodontic-surgical treatment resulted in short term decrease of the investigated symptoms and clinical signs of pain in cervical muscles, and reduction of mandibular opening in patients with dentofacial deformities. Clinical trials register: 083578.
Keywords: Maxillofacial development; Surgery, oral; Temporomandibular joint/pathology; Malocclusion; Tooth abnormalities
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is responsible for mandibular movements, triggered for masticatory muscles(1) and is considered the most complex joint in the human body(2).
The occurrence of unfavorable situations that affect TMJ is frequently because that joint should be adapted to the occlusion, muscle and cervical changes(3). Imbalance conditions may result in a dysfunction, which is the generic term for temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD), related to clinical signs and symptoms involving the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joint and associate structures(4).
TMD's cause is multifactorial, involving occlusion changing, dysfunctional habits (like bruxism and clenching), stress, anxiety or abnormalities in intra-articular disc. This factors may be related to joint inflammatory occurrence, muscular damage and pain or throes(5).
Recently, many theories about TMD's development has been questioned(5). Some authors say that abnormal dental occlusion occurs equally in people with or without TMD's symptoms(6,7); other authors say that normal occlusion doesn't improve TMD's signs and symptoms(8,9).
Therefore, some studies have checked the impact of orthodontic surgery treatment in dentofacial deformities in modification of signs and symptoms of TMD(10-12).
So, it is important to consider that there are contradictions on the literature about TMD and occlusion which difficult for professional to understand about the rehabilitation of this dysfunction. The object of this study was verifying if the orthodontic surgery treatment may modify signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) in individuals with dentofacial deformities.
The study was approved by the Ethics in Research Comitte of the Universidade do Sagrado Coração (number 108/2005).
Twenty adults patients were included in this study (with age ranging between 15 and 44 years, mean of 25,5 years); 17 were female and three were male, with different occlusion (Angle molar relationship class II for 11 patients and class III for nine) and facial features (medium facial type for 11 patients and dolichofacial for nine), submitted to mandibular and/or maxillary osteotomy responsible for advance or retreat mandibular procedures.
All selected patients presented at least on sign or symptom of TMD, verified through interview and clinical evaluation made by an interdisciplinary group, consisting of a dentist, physiotherapist and speech and language pathologist expert in the area, before the orthognathic surgery. The aspects were evaluated again 30 and 60 days after the surgery.
It was investigated the following symptoms in the interview: headache; pain in facial muscles and/or in TMJ; pain during chewing; auditory or vestibular aspects (earache, vertigo, dizziness, tinnitus, ear fullness and hearing loss).
On the stomatognathic system evaluation were measured the mandibular movements (mouth opening and laterality); realized auscultation from TMJ during opening, closing, laterality and mandibular protrusion and registered the presence of articular reproducible noise (pops and cracks), when it was found in one or more mandibular movement evaluated; investigated pain during palpation on superficial and profound masseter muscles, lateral and medial pterygoid, anterior, medium and posterior temporalis, superior, lateral and posterior TMJ.
The data were submitted to statistical analysis using McNemar test for qualitative data and T test from Student for the quantitative data. The 5% level was considered significant (p<0,05).
The symptoms investigated through interview are in the Table 1. After orthognathic surgery all symptoms decreased. Twelve patients complained about headache before surgery and did not complain about it after surgery (p=0.007). Five patients complained about pain in facial muscle only before surgery (p=0.00006). Three patients complained about pain in TMJ only before surgery (p=0.00001). Seven patients complained about pain during chewing before surgery and did not complain about it after surgery, but other two patients had pain during chewing after surgery (p=0.007).
About auditory and vestibular symptoms, five patients complained about ear fullness before surgery and one patient reported about earache after surgery.
Related to mandibular movements, when compared before and after surgery, the results showed decrease in the mouth opening after surgery (p=0.00004) and little variation on laterality movements (Table 2).
When compared the data about pain during palpation on masticatory and cervical muscles and TMJ, before and after orthognathic surgery, it was noticed pain relief on trapezius muscles (p=0.00006) and sternocleidomastoid muscle (p=0.0005) (Figure 1).
About articulation reproducible noise, it was noticed presence of articulation noise in eight patients before surgery (40%) while seven patients presented it after surgery (35%), result without difference.
The examination of TMD in individuals with occlusion changes can be explained by the high incidence of functional and anatomic problems of temporomandibular joint in these cases(13); however studies that related this condition are contradictory. So, the present study investigated the occurrence of signs and symptoms os TMD in patients submitted to occlusion correction using the orthodonthic surgery treatment.
The highest percentage of patients investigated (85%) was female, agreeing with other studies that demonstrate higher prevalence of TMD in women(14,15). Studies that relate hormonal influences on the appearance of signs and symptoms of TMD have found association between this aspects(16,17).
At this study was observed considerable presence of signs and symptoms of TMD before surgery, condition justified by the decrease of stomatognathic system adaptative capacity caused by occlusion changes and maxillomandibular discrepancy(5,18).
For patients in this study, after the orthodonthic surgery treatment was observed significant decrease on TMD symptoms, agreeing with studies in the literature(11,12). However, authors have found the appearance of TMD symptoms after orthodonthic surgery treatment(10,19). This disagreement can be related to the type of surgery procedure realized, since the first one investigated cases submitted to maxillary osteotomy and the second author evaluated cases submitted to mandibular advancement surgery. At this study, the patients were submitted to different types of mandibular movement with or without maxillary intervention.
About auditory and vestibular symptoms, at this study five patients complained about ear fullness before surgery, agreeing with a study that demonstrated relevant occurrence of this symptom in individuals with TMD(20). One patient complained about earache after surgery, what can be related to pain during mandibular condyle palpation in subjects with dysfunction(21). Studies that make an association between earache, tunnitus, hearing loss, ear fullness and vertigo with DTM are common in the literature(22-24).
At this study was found an important decrease of mouth opening after surgery. According to the literature, after surgery the mandibular movements tend to be reduced, assuming normal values from three to 14 months after surgery(25,26). A study presented some cases that the injury in orofacial myology improved in three months after orthognathic surgery, with a significant increase of mandibular protrusion and laterality(27). A short-term evaluation realized in this study (between 30 and 60 days after surgery) can explain the differences with studies published before.
With orthognathic surgery, a decrease in pain during palpation in cervical muscles was observed. None studies in the literature were found relating this aspect, but bad occlusion can modify the posture as a compensation mechanism. It may justify the decrease of pain during palpation in cervical muscles after orthodonthic surgery correction.
On the patients evaluated at this study, it was observed that, even with the structural correction resultant from the orthodonthic surgery treatment, the stomatognathic system reorganization did not occur naturally; and speech and language pathology intervention was necessary in order to adapt the orofacial functions. We should pay attention on masticatory function, in which the default is influenced by temporomandibular dysfunction and presence of changes in mandibular movement(18-28).
Another aspect not discussed in this study that should be considered is the change in thermal and tactile sensitivity result from mandibular osteotomy procedure. It may be transitory but causing drooling, accumulation of saliva and food on lips comissure and difficult with lips movement(29).
So, improvement on signs and symptoms of TMD after orthodonthic surgery treatment occur because of morphofunctional balance established by the treatment and monitoring of the patient by interdisciplinary group. The interdisciplinary group, in these cases, was extremely important considering the etiology of this dysfunction is multifactorial and need a management of all causal aspects to have a good prognosis.
The orthodontic surgery treatment caused, in a short term, decrease in the symptoms: headache, pain in the facial muscle, pain in TMJ, pain during chewing and in the clinical signs of pain during palpation on the cervical muscle; still result in decrease of mouth opening in patients with detofacial deformities.
1. Anelli-Bastos W, Oliveira MFR. Atuação fonoaudiológica na disfunção temporomandibular. In: Lopes Filho O, editor. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. 2a ed. Ribeirão Preto: Tecmedd; 2005. p. 755-65. [ Links ]
2. Zemlin WR. Articulação. In: Zemlin WR. Princípios de anatomia e fisiologia em fonoaudiologia. 4a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2000. p. 215-335. [ Links ]
3. Bianchini EMG. Articulação temporomandibular e fonoaudiologia. In: Ferreira LP, Befi-Lopes DM, Limongi SCO, organizadores. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2004. p. 315-29. [ Links ]
4. de Oliveira AS, Dias EM, Contato RG, Berzin F. Prevalence study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder in Brazilian college students. Braz Oral Res. 2006;20(1):3-7. [ Links ]
5. Buescher JJ. Temporomandibular joint disorders. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(10):1477-82. Review. [ Links ]
6. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L, Von Korff M, Howard J, Truelove E, Sommers E. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120(3):273-81. [ Links ]
7. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9(1):73-90. [ Links ]
8. Al-Ani MZ, Davies SJ, Gray RJ, Sloan P, Glenny AM. Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002778. Review. [ Links ]
9. Koh H, Robinson PG. Occlusal adjustment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(4):287-92. Review. [ Links ]
10. Aoyama S, Kino K, Kobayashi J, Yoshimasu H, Amagasa T. Clinical evaluation of the temporomandibular joint following orthognathic surgerymultiple logistic regression analysis. J Med Dent Sci. 2005;52(2):109-14. [ Links ]
11. Pahkala RH, Kellokoski JK. Surgical-orthodontic treatment and patients' functional and psychosocial well-being. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(2):158-64. [ Links ]
12. Panula K, Somppi M, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Effects of orthognathic surgery on temporomandibular joint dysfunction. A controlled prospective 4-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29(3):183-7. [ Links ]
13. Altman EB. Myofunctional therapy and orthognathic surgery. Int J Orofacial Myology. 1987;13(3):2-12. [ Links ]
14. Barbosa CMR, Queluz DP, Barbosa JRA, Di Hipólito Júnior O. Correlação entre aparelho ortodôntico, sexo e presença de desordens temporomandibulares. J Bras Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2002;7(39):185-92. [ Links ]
15. Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(4):411-7. [ Links ]
16. Fischer L, Clemente JT, Tambeli CH. The protective role of testosterone in the development of temporomandibular joint pain. J Pain. 2007;8(5):437-42. [ Links ]
17. Fischer L, Torres-Chávez KE, Clemente-Napimoga JT, Jorge D, Arsati F, de Arruda Veiga MC, Tambeli CH. The influence of sex and ovarian hormones on temporomandibular joint nociception in rats. J Pain. 2008;9(7):630-8. [ Links ]
18. Berretin-Felix G, Jorge TM, Genaro KF. Intervenção fonoaudiológica em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia ortognática. In: Ferreira LP, Befi-Lopes DM, Limongi SCO, organizadores. Tratado de fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Roca; 2004. p. 494-511. [ Links ]
19. Wolford LM, Reiche-Fischel O, Mehra P. Changes in temporomandibular joint diysfunction after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(6):655-60; discussion 661. [ Links ]
20. Kuttila S, Kuttila M, Le Bell Y, Alanen P, Jouko S. Aural symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorder in association with treatment need and visits to a physician. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(10):1669-73. [ Links ]
21. dos Reis AC, Hotta TH, Ferreira-Jeronymo RR, Felício CM, Ribeiro RF. Ear symptomatology and occlusal factors: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):21-4. [ Links ]
22. Pereira KNF, Andrade LLS, Costa MLG, Portal TF. Sinais e sintomas de pacientes com disfunção temporomandibular. Rev CEFAC. 2005;7(2):221-8. [ Links ]
23. Silveira AM, Feltrin PP, Zanetti RV, Mautoni MC. Prevalência de portadores de DTM em pacientes avaliados no setor de otorrinolaringologia. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2007;73(4):528-32. [ Links ]
24. Zeigelboim BS, Jurkiewicz AL, Martins-Bassetto J, Klagenberg KF. Avaliação vestibular em mulheres com disfunção temporomandibular. Rev CEFAC. 2007;9(2):255-62.25. Boyd SB, Karas ND, Sinn DP. Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49(9):924-31. [ Links ]
26. Zarrinkelk HM, Throckmorton G, Ellis E 3rd, Sinn DP. A longitudinal study of changes in masticatory performance of patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(7):777-82; discussion 782-3. [ Links ]
27. Milosevic A, Samuels RH. Mandibular mobility and occlusal relationships after orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1997;12(2):122-8. [ Links ]
28. rawitzki LVV, Dantas RO, Mello-Filho FV, Marques W Jr. Effect of treatment of dentofacial deformities on the electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(2):170-3. [ Links ]
29. Ylikontiola L, Vesala J, Oikarinen K. Repeatability of 5 clinical neurosensory tests used in orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2001;16(1):36-46. [ Links ]
Correspondence address: Received: 11/5/2009 Study carried out
at the Lato Sensu Course in Speech-Language Pathology and Orthognathic Surgery,
Universidade do Sagrado Coração - USC - Bauru (SP), Brazil.
Al. Dr. Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla, 9-75
Bauru (SP), Brazil
Study carried out at the Lato Sensu Course in Speech-Language Pathology and Orthognathic Surgery, Universidade do Sagrado Coração - USC - Bauru (SP), Brazil.