Services on Demand
- Similars in SciELO
On-line version ISSN 1982-0232
Rev. soc. bras. fonoaudiol. vol.16 no.2 São Paulo Apr./June 2011
Simone Aparecida CapelliniI; Adriana Marques de OliveiraII; Fábio Henrique PinheiroIII
of Speech and Hearing Therapy and the Graduate Program in Education of the School
of Philosophy and Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de
Mesquita Filho" - UNESP - Marília (SP), Brazil
IIMaster in Education from the School of Philosophy and Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP - Marília (SP), Brazil
IIIGraduate Program (PhD) in Education of the School of Philosophy and Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP - Marília (SP), Brazil
To verify the effectiveness of the computerized version of a metaphonological
and reading remediation program for students with learning difficulties.
METHODS: Participants were 600 2nd to 4th grade students from public elementary schools distributed into Groups I (GI) and II (GII). GI was composed by 300 students with learning difficulties subdivided into GIc: 150 students who were not submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program; and GIe: 150 students submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program. GII consisted of 300 students with good academic performance subdivided into GIIc: 150 students who were not submitted to the remediation program, and GIIe: 150 students submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program. The computerized metaphonological and reading remediation program was developed to be used in evaluation and intervention. The program had three stages: pre-testing, intervention and post-testing.
RESULTS: Differences were found between pre and post-tests for GIe subjects in all tests of the evaluation version of the program and in all abilities emphasized on the remediation program, and for GIIe subjects in the sound recognition, segmentation and phonemic manipulation tasks.
CONCLUSION: The findings evidence the effectiveness of the computerized metaphonological and reading remediation program developed for this study, since the students with learning difficulties submitted to the remediation program developed the metaphonological abilities required for reading development.
Keywords: Learning; Evaluation/methods; Reading; Learning disorders; Comprehension; Computer-assisted instruction
To increase his or her metaphonological capacities, in other words, in order to reflect about language and acquire ability to think about his or her own language, the child has to develop in parallel to language aspects (phonological, morphologic and syntactic levels) the metaphonological capacity, in its phonological level. In this way, the child starts to reflect about the sound system of the language, and acquires awareness of sentences, words, syllables and phonemes as smaller unities(1-4).
Studies have shown that the abilities of the phonological process are related to reading acquisition(5,6); because the phonological process is divided into: phonological awareness, related to the awareness of the sound structure of the speech; rapid naming, referent to the velocity in naming objects, letters and colors, reflecting, in this way, on the ability of decoding and read words; and phonological memory, related to the capacity of decoding or impression of temporary phonological information, before storing it in the long-term memory(7).
Thus, the direct instruction of phonological awareness combined with the instruction of grapheme-phoneme correspondence assists in the acquisition of the alphabetical principle and the successful development of metaphonological abilities, supporting reading acquisition(2,3,8,9).
In general, the students who fail in the acquisition of the alphabetical principle also fail in the development of initial abilities of reading words; that is, the students with reading disabilities have difficulties in metaphonological tasks. This fact supports the idea that these students present a central phonological deficit, and, as they proceed in grade level, they start to manifest problems related to fluency and reading comprehension(10,11).
In other words, the students who show reading disabilities in the initial grades of alphabetization, and who remain without instruction to the learning of the alphabetical principle, will persist with the same difficulties during their academic life. In the following years, these difficulties accentuate, and there is an increase in the difference of performance between the students with reading difficulties and their class-group(12,13).
There is no consensus on the definition of learning disability, nor is it agreed upon how, why or when it manifests. Learning disabilities are characterized by a heterogeneous group of manifestations that cause low academic achievement in reading, writing and mathematical calculus tasks. They may be categorized as transitional and occur at any moment in the teaching-learning process(14,15).
In this way, there is a concern for the minimization of the impact and the overcoming of these difficulties in the following years. In this direction there are studies about intervention programs that act on the metaphonological basis of these difficulties(16-18).
Based on what has been shown, this study aims to verify the effectiveness of the program of metaphonological and reading remediation, elaborated in a computerized version, for students with learning disabilities.
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee in Research of the School of Philosophy and Sciences of Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - FFC/UNESP - Marília, under the protocol number 3326/2006.
All the parents or guardians were informed about the procedures of the data collection and signed the Free and Informed Consent Form on behalf of the children.
A number of 600 students from both genders, attending 1st to 4th grades of five municipal public schools of three cities in the state of São Paulo (SP), participated in this study, in the age range between 8 and 12 years old, distributed into two groups:
- Group I (GI): composed by 300 students attending 2nd to 4th grades of elementary level, with learning difficulties, subdivided into Group Ic (GIc): composed by 150 students with learning difficulties, who were not submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program; and Group Ie (GIe): composed by 150 students with learning difficulties, submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program.
- Group II (GII): composed by 300 students attending 2nd to 4th grades of the elementary level, with good academic performance, subdivided into group IIc (GIIc): composed by 150 students with good academic performance, who were not submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program; and Group IIe (GIIe): composed by 150 students with good academic performance, who were submitted to the metaphonological and reading remediation program.
The indication of the students with and without learning difficulties was performed by the teachers from the five municipal public schools where the study was realized, based on the students' development report. The students did not present any cognitive, hearing and visual alterations described in the school records.
The procedure used for evaluation in the situation of pre-testing was the metaphonological and reading remediation program in the computerized version(19). This program was composed by an evaluation session of approximately 30 minutes, realized individually. The answers to these activities were provided through the mouse utilization by the student, who should indicate, with the cursor, the right answer, on the computer screen. The answers were registered by the number of correct marks.
The evaluation was composed by the following activities, applied in the same order to all the students: reading of words and nonwords: 21 pictures were presented for the students to recognize among the 42 presented words which ones corresponded to the pictures; nonwords reading: 12 real words and 12 nonwords were presented for the student to recognize among the 24 stimuli the nonwords; rhyme identification: 40 pictures were presented for the student to recognize when the pictures names presented rhyme; alliteration identification: 40 pictures were presented for the student to recognize alliteration; sounds discrimination: 40 pictures were presented for the student to recognize if they began with the same sound; syllabic segmentation: ten pictures and numbers were presented and the students had to indicate the number of syllables corresponding to each word; phonemic segmentation: ten pictures followed by numbers were presented and the students had to indicate the correspondent number of sounds in each word; syllabic manipulation: pictures were presented for the students to combine the first syllable of the word in the first picture and the last syllable of the word in the second one to form a new word; and phonemic manipulation: pictures were presented for the student to combine the first sound of the first picture with the last sound of the second picture.
In the intervention the metaphonological and reading remediation program in the computerized version(19) was used, composed by six sessions of remediation per student, in the same presentation order, realized twice a week with approximately 50 minutes of duration. In each session the following sequence was presented:
Alphabet sequence presentation for the child to identify the letter name and sound; oral reading of words and nonwords presented in the computer screen; grapheme/phoneme presentation (grapheme/phoneme relation independent from the context) to select the pictures which presented the target grapheme/phoneme in initial, medial and final position; presentation of syllables for the selection of pictures which presented the target syllable in initial, medial and final position; presentation of two graphic stimuli, a dissyllable and a trisyllable real word and nonword, for the students to form, from the syllabic and phonemic segments, new real dissyllable and trisyllable words; presentation of picture, for the identification of those which begin with the same sound (alliteration) and end with the same sound (rhyme); and presentation of ten words in each session for the students, in order to verify the number of correct marks (reading accuracy). Five different words and nonwords were presented in each session.
The program was realized in the computer lab of the school, containing 20 computers, with multimedia kit built-in and speakers, in which the sounds and words used were emitted. This process occurred by the mouse utilization and the activation of sound files by clicking on the computer screen. In the computer lab, besides the researcher, responsible for the monitoring of the task realization and identification of tasks that should be developed, there were also teachers and interns from the areas of Pedagogy and Speech and Hearing Therapy. After the explanation of each activity, the students counted with an only chance for the realization of the activity of each item worked, being their right answer positively enhanced by the clapping sounds emission.
The stimuli (figures, words and non words) used for the elaboration of the program, in its evaluative and interceptive version, of this study derived of the word bank elaborated from Portuguese Language books that are used by the municipal school system.
The evaluation after the testing consisted in the reapplication of the computerized metaphonological and reading remediation program, in the evaluative version.
The results analysis was realized with the application of the Friedman Test, in order to verify possible differences between the variable components of each remediation strategy, to each group, and the Wilcoxon Signed-rank test in order to check for possible differences among the groups in pre an post-testing. The results were statically analyzed by the SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), in its 13,0 version, with significance level of 5% (0,050) to the statistic tests application.
When the average of the students from GIc and Gie were compared in pre and post-testing, it was observed that there was no difference between the pre and post evaluation in GIc results. This result indicates that there was no difference on the performances of these students, while in GIe there were differences at all tests, what reveals that after the application of the program on its interceptive version, the students improved their performance in the evaluation tests, evidencing the therapeutic effectiveness of the program (Table 1).
When the average of the students from GIIc and GIIe were compared in pre and post evaluation, it was observed that there was no difference between the pre and post evaluation in GIIc results and, therefore, there was no difference in the performance of these students. In GIIe differences occurred only in phonemic segmentation and manipulation tests, which reveals that after the application of the program on its interceptive version, the students improved their performance in the evaluation tests. This highlights the therapeutic effectiveness of the program for these abilities (Table 2).
The results of the averages comparison, standard deviation and median of the marks of students from GIe and GIIe during the six sessions of the remediation program may be observed in Tables 3 to 5.
When the Friedman Test was applied, it was observed that differences occurred in all the abilities worked in therapeutic situation with GIe. Between the first and the last session there was an increase in the students' performances. It was observed that positive difference occurred only in the ability of recognition of sounds from the letters of the alphabet, which was interpreted as an increase in the performance of the students from GIIe in relation to this ability.
This study evidenced the difference in the performance of the students from GI and GII in relation to the reading and metaphonological abilities. This result corroborates the findings of the literature which evidence that students with learning difficulties show discrepancy in relation to their peers in reading abilities(20,21).
The inferior performance of GI in relation to the abilities of phonological awareness and reading of words and nonwords confirms the literature(21,22), which describes inferior results in phonological awareness in students with learning difficulties.
The results obtained by the students from GIe, who showed inferior performance in the tests of sound discrimination, reading of words and nonwords, sound and syllable segmentation and manipulation and also in the phonological awareness ability (rhyme and alliteration), if compared in pre and post-testing situations, are in agreement with the literature(23,24). For these authors the students with learning difficulties show deficits in the perception of phonemes and in the abilities of temporal ordering judgment, identification and discrimination.
The difficulties in relation to the recognition of a standard of letters in the word as a unity, verified in the inferior performance of GI, corroborates national and international studies(25,26). These studies link the presence of alteration in memory and in hearing perception in children with learning difficulties, what disturbs the maintenance of a fluent reading. The literature indicates that intervention programs of a phonological basis are efficient to reach greater reading accuracy(9) and this can be verified in the reading performance of GIe, which presented improvement in this ability after being submitted to the remediation program, while the GIc did not present the same result.
The superior performance of the experimental groups in metaphonological abilities and in reading of words and nonwords corroborates the literature(8). Hearing, visual and memory abilities are implied in the acquisition of reading abilities, and are necessary abilities for the learning of the Brazilian Portuguese writing system.
In this way, it was verified that the more efficient decoding, of both words and nonwords, relieves the cognitive load, allowing more attention to be directed to reading(27).
In this study, the students with reading difficulty (GI) showed difference in pre and post evaluation situation, in the scores obtained for fast automatic naming of pictures and fast automatic naming of digits, which was interpreted as an improvement in working memory after the intervention program. This result has a direct reflex in the reading ability due to the relation between its development and the working memory development; in which the establishment and manipulation of the phonologic representations will occur(28).
The students with learning difficulties presented increase in all the evaluated abilities, corroborating the authors' results(29,30), who found difference before and after the evaluation, in the access of phonological awareness tasks, after the application of the phonological stimulation program that includes phonological awareness activities and metalinguistic abilities. These results are in accordance with the literature that links the effectiveness of the interventions programs that use strategies of phonological awareness and reading (16-18).
In addition, the study showed that both experimental groups beneficiated from the program, and that the learning of the letter and sound relation by the students with no difficulties favored the development of segmentation abilities and phonemic manipulation. This highlights the necessity of teaching the correspondence between letters and sounds, characteristic of the Brazilian Portuguese writing system.
In this study, it was observed that the students from GIe submitted to the remediation responded to the realized intervention, in other words, the program was efficient because it provided the acquisition of the necessary abilities for alphabetization; in this way, teachers need to be oriented by speech therapists about the necessity of focusing on the metaphonological and reading abilities in the initial grades of alphabetization to support the learning of the Brazilian Portuguese alphabetic principle, regardless of the methodology of alphabetization used in classroom(8).
One limitation of the study is that the computerized program does not provide the data related to the correct marks in the form of a report. However, this limitation is about to be overcome and used in further researches.
The findings of this study allow to conclude that the metaphonologic remediation and reading program, in computerized version, elaborated for this study, was effective, because the students with and without learning difficulty submitted to the program showed superior performance in post-testing situation, if compared to the pre-test situation.
The students with learning difficulties, submitted to the remediation program showed superior performance in post evaluation situation, if compared to pre evaluation in sounds discrimination abilities, reading of words and nonwords, sounds and syllables segmentation and manipulation, and also in the phonological awareness abilities (rhyme and alliteration), while the students with no learning difficulties showed superior performance in the segmentation and phonemic manipulation abilities, evidencing the necessity of using metapholonogical abilities associated to reading for the acquisition of the alphabetic principle of the Brazilian Portuguese writing system.
We thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), for the support provided to this research through MCT/CNPq 02/2006 - Universal, process number 474871/2006-1.
1. Deuschle VP, Cechella C. O déficit em consciência fonológica e sua relação com a dislexia: diagnóstico e intervenção. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(Supl 2):194-200. [ Links ]
2. Gupta P, Tisdale J. Does phonological short-term memory causally determine vocabulary learning? Toward a computational resolution of the debate. J Mem Lang. 2009;61(4):481-502. [ Links ]
3. Nunes C, Frota S, Mousinho R. Consciência fonológica e o processo de aprendizagem de leitura e escrita: implicações teóricas para o embasamento da prática fonoaudiológica. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(2):207-12. [ Links ]
4. Germano GD, Pinheiro FH, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares com dislexia do desenvolvimento em tarefas fonológicas e silábicas. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(2):213-20. [ Links ]
5. Vaessen A, Blomert L. Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010;105(3):213-31. [ Links ]
6. Vloedgraven J, Verhoeven L. The nature of phonological awareness throughout the elementary grades: an item response theory perspective. Learn Individ Differ. 2009;19(2):161-9. [ Links ]
7. Kerins M, Winkler K, Sweeney M, Carran D. The effects of systematic reading instruction on three classifications of readers. Read Res Instruct. 2006;45(3):243-60. [ Links ]
8. Cunha VLO, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares de 1ª a 4ª série do ensino fundamental nas provas de habilidades metafonológicas e de leitura - PROHMELE. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2009;14(1):56-68. [ Links ]
9. Piasta SB, Wagner RK. Learning letter names and sounds: effects of instruction, letter type, and phonological processing skill. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010;105(4):324-44. [ Links ]
10. Harn BA, Stoolmiller M, Chard DJ. Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: the role of automaticity and unitization. J Learn Disabil. 2008;41(2):143-57. [ Links ]
11. Chard DJ, Stoolmiller M, Harn BA, Wanzek J, Vaughn S, Linan-Thompson S, Kame'enui EJ. Predicting reading success in a multilevel schoolwide reading model: a retrospective analysis. J Learn Disabil.2008;41(2):174-88. [ Links ]
12. Ziolkowska R. Early intervention for students with reading and writing difficulties. Read Improv. 2007;44(2):76-86. [ Links ]
13. Berninger VW, Abbott RD, Veremeulen K, Fulton CM. Paths to reading comprehension in at-risk second-grade readers. J Learn Disabil. 2006;39(4):334-51. [ Links ]
14. Rebello JAS. Dificuldades da leitura e da escrita em alunos do ensino básico. Rio Tinto: Edições Asa; 1993. [ Links ]
15. Capellini SA, Silva APC, Silva C, Pinheiro FH. Avaliação e diagnóstico fonoaudiológico nos distúrbios de aprendizagem e dislexias. In: Zorzi JL, Capellini SA, organizadores. Dislexia e outros distúrbios de leitura escrita: letras desafiando a aprendizagem. 2a ed. São José dos Campos: Pulso; c2009. p. 95-111. [ Links ]
16. Mota HB, Melo Filha MGC. Habilidades em consciência fonológica de sujeitos após realização de terapia fonológica. Pró-Fono. 2009;21(2):119-24. [ Links ]
17. Germano GD, Capellini SA. Eficácia do programa de remediação auditivo-visual computadorizado em escolares com dislexia. Pró-Fono. 2008;20(4):237-42. [ Links ]
18. Salgado CA, Capellini SA. Programa de remediação fonológica em escolares com dislexia do desenvolvimento. Pró-Fono. 2008;20(1):31-6. [ Links ]
19. Capellini SA. Programa de remediação metalinguístico e leitura para escolares com dificuldades de aprendizagem: elaboração de procedimento avaliativo-terapêutico computadorizado. Relatório Final submetido ao Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); 2008. Processo No.: 474871/2006-1. [ Links ]
20. Bayliss DM, Jarrold C, Baddeley AD, Leigh E. Differential constraints on the working memory and reading abilities of individuals with learning difficulties and typically developing children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005;92(1):76-99. [ Links ]
21. Silva APC, Capellini SA. Desempenho de escolares com dificuldades de aprendizagem em um programa de intervenção com a consciência fonológica. Rev Psicopedag. 2009;26(80):207-19. [ Links ]
22. Billard C, Fluss J, Ducot B, Warszawski J, Ecalle J, Magnan A, et al. Étude des facteurs liés aux difficulties d'apprentissage de la lecture à partir d'un échantillon de 1062 enfants de seconde anné d'école élemetaire. Arch Pediatr. 2008;15(6):1058-67. [ Links ]
23. Breier JI, Fletcher JM, Denton C, Gray LC. Categorical perception of speech stimuli in children at risk for reading difficulty. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004;88(2):152-70. [ Links ]
24. Cao F, Bitan T, Booth JR. Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain Lang. 2008;107(2):91-101. [ Links ]
25. Conrad NJ, Levy BA. Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Read Writ. 2007;20(3):201-23. [ Links ]
26. Capellini SA, Padula NAMR, Ciasca SM. Desempenho de escolares com distúrbio específico de leitura em programa de remediação. Pró-Fono. 2004;16(3):261-74. [ Links ]
27. Shapiro ES, Solari E, Petscher Y. Use of a measure of reading comprehension to enhance prediction on the state high stakes assessment. Learn Individ Differ. 2008;18(3):316-28. [ Links ]
28. Gindri G, Keske-Soares M, Mota HB. Memória de trabalho, consciência fonológica e hipótese de escrita. Pró-Fono. 2007;19(3):313-22. [ Links ]
29. Wanzek J, Vaughn S. Response to varying amounts of time in reading intervention for students with low response to intervention. J Learn Disabil. 2008;41(2):126-42. [ Links ]
30. Cárnio MS, Santos D. Evolução da consciência fonológica em alunos de ensino fundamental. Pró-Fono. 2005;17(2):195-200. [ Links ]
Correspondence address: Received: 3/31/2010 Developed at the
Speech and Hearing Therapy Department of the School of Philosophy and Sciences,
Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP - Marília
Simone Aparecida Capellini
Av. Hygino Muzzi Filho, 737
Campus Universitário, Marília (SP), Brasil
Developed at the Speech and Hearing Therapy Department of the School of Philosophy and Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP - Marília (SP), Brazil.