Acessibilidade / Reportar erro
Erratum • Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 36 (5) • Sep-Oct 2014 • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.08.001   copy
This erratum corrects:

Erratum to "Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?"

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

In the article "Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?", published in Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014;36(3):219–25, please consider the following corrections:

  • Page 221, Table 1, Criteria or rule 12 ">100 × 109/μL" should read as ">100 × 103/μL".

  • Page 223, Table 6, Sensitivity "62.6%" should read as "63.2%"; Positive predictive value "71.2%" should read as "71.6%"; and Efficiency "73.8%" should read as "73.9%".

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Sep-Oct 2014
Creative Common - by-nc 4.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular R. Dr. Diogo de Faria, 775 cj 114, 04037-002 São Paulo/SP/Brasil, Tel. (55 11) 2369-7767/2338-6764 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: secretaria@rbhh.org
Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS