SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 issue6Fish species diversity in headwaters streams of Paraguay and Paraná BasinsAssesment of soil erosion by 137Cs technique in native forests in Londrina City, Parana, Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology

Print version ISSN 1516-8913On-line version ISSN 1678-4324

Braz. arch. biol. technol. vol.50 no.6 Curitiba Nov. 2007

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132007000700015 

BIOLOGICAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES

 

Floral visitors and reproductive strategies in five melittophilous species of Bignoniaceae in Southeastern Brazil

 

 

Yuriko A. N. Pinto Yanagizawa; Rita de Cassia Sindrônia Maimoni-Rodella*

Departamento de Botânica; Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu; Universidade Estadual Paulista – UNESP; C. P. 510; 18618-000; Botucatu - SP - Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

In order to evaluate the pollination strategies of Bignoniaceae, the floral biology and the floral visitors in five species, three cerrado shrubs (Arrabidaea brachypoda (DC.) Bor., Jacaranda decurrens Cham., and Jacaranda oxyphylla Cham.), and two lianas from the border of a semideciduous seasonal forest (Arrabidaea samydoides (Cham.) Sandw., and Arrabidaea triplinervia H. Baill.) were studied in Botucatu, São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil. The flowering periods were partially overlapping, especially between species in the same habitat. All the five species were functionally allogamous, melittophilous, nototribic and mainly pollinated by long tongued large bees. Some medium-sized and small pollen-foraging bees were occasional legitimate visitors, whereas others visitors were robbers/thieves. Each species showed a particular set of pollinators. Only two pollinator species were observed in more than one bignon. There was no partition of pollinators even among the species of bignons blooming at the same time at the same habitat.

Key words: Arrabidaea, Jacaranda, melittophilly, pollination, breeding system


RESUMO

Com objetivo de avaliar as estratégias de polinização de espécies de Bignoniaceae, foram estudados a biologia floral e os visitantes florais de cinco espécies, três arbustivas do cerrado (Arrabidaea brachypoda (DC.) Bor., Jacaranda decurrens Cham. e Jacaranda oxyphylla Cham.) e duas lianas da orla da floresta estacional semidecidual (Arrabidaea samydoides (Cham.) Sandw. e Arrabidaea triplinervia H. Baill.), na região de Botucatu (22º52'20" S e 48026'37" W), estado de São Paulo, sudeste do Brasil. Os períodos de florescimento, principalmente entre espécies do mesmo habitat, apresentaram sobreposição parcial. Observou-se que as cinco espécies são alogâmicas funcionais, melitófilas, nototríbicas, polinizadas principalmente por abelhas grandes de língua comprida. Algumas abelhas coletoras de pólen de tamanho médio e pequeno atuaram como polinizadoras ocasionais, enquanto outros visitantes foram pilhadores. Cada uma das Bignoniaceae apresentou um conjunto particular de polinizadores havendo apenas duas espécies comuns a mais de uma delas. Não houve partilha de polinizadores mesmo entre bignoniáceas que, no mesmo habitat, apresentaram períodos de florescimento simultâneo.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Bignoniaceae are often one of the most important members of Neotropical plant communities (Gentry 1988). The study of pollination strategies is of major importance in understanding the reproductive adaptation of this plant family. Studying the distribution, ecology, and co-evolutionary patterns in tropical Bignoniaceae, Gentry (1974a, 1974b, 1976) suggested that sympatric species presented species-specific niches, and that pollinator interaction mode is a determinant of intra-community bignon diversity.

Co-occurring species of this family in Neotropical communities have particular forms of pollination. This can be seen in their floral variety in association to diverse pollinators such as bats, hummingbirds, moths, butterflies, and bees (e.g. Bertin 1982, Weber and Vogel 1986, Gentry 1990, Endress 1994, Barros 2001). Gentry (1976) proposed that, in general, in a certain plant community, only one bignon species of each pollination strategy would be flowering at any time. In some bignon species that share the same pool of pollinators, mainly bees, seasonal separation would also be an important isolating mechanism (Gentry 1974a, 1974b). The floral biology of bignon species has been investigated in some communities in Brazil (Yanagizawa and Gottsberger 1983, Amaral 1992 in Bittencourt Jr. 2003, Gobatto-Rodrigues and Stort 1992, Barros 2001, Dutra and Machado 2001, Lopes et al. 2002, Bittencourt Jr. et al. 2003, Bittencourt Jr. and Semir 2004, 2005).

In the Botucatu region, São Paulo State, Southeastern Brazil, species of Bignoniaceae occur in vegetation fragments (Grombone-Guaratini and Maimoni-Rodella 1995; Silberbauer-Gottsberger and Eiten 1983). In this region, five species were studied. Individuals of three shrub species (Arrabidaea brachypoda (DC.) Bor., Jacaranda decurrens Cham. and Jacaranda oxyphylla Cham.), occurred in a secondary cerrado vegetation; two liana species (Arrabidaea samydoides (Cham.) Sandw. and Arrabidaea triplinervia H. Baill.) were found in a semideciduous seasonal forest edge. Considering that the studied vegetation fragments were located side by side, and the available information about the adaptation of Jacaranda (Bittencourt 1981 in Bittencourt Jr. 2003, Vieira et al. 1992 in Bittencourt Jr. 2003, Bittencourt Jr. 2003) and Arrabidaea (Amaral 1992 in Bittencourt Jr. 2003) for bee pollinators, the similarity between their floral visitors was analyzed. This investigation was carried out aiming to describe the floral biology of these five species and to answer the following questions: Did the species flower at the same time? If so, did they share pollinators?

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The regional climate at Botucatu is humid subtropical with dry winter and rainy summer, that is, Koeppen´s Cwb (Carvalho et al. 1983). The rainy season normally starts in October and lasts until March (Tubellis et al. 1971). Cerrado and semideciduous seasonal forest are the two predominant vegetation types in this region, but they have been heavily impacted by humans and exist at the present time as often highly disturbed fragments. In cerrado areas, Arrabidaea brachypoda (23 individuals), Jacaranda decurrens (03 individuals) and J. oxyphylla (30 individuals) were studied, as well as, A. samydoides (04 individuals) and A. triplinervia (06 individuals) in semideciduous seasonal forest borders.

These species were analyzed for plant habit, flower traits (shape, texture, color, size, nectar and scent), length of anthesis, number of flowers per inflorescence and breeding systems, between August 1978 and December 1981. Measurements of floral parts were based on ten flowers. All the individuals were monitored every fifteen days, recording initial and final flowering periods. Flowering intensity was visually estimated. The breeding system was defined based on the automatic pollination and hand-made tests such as self-pollination, geitonogamy, and xenogamy, according to Dafni (1992). These tests were performed by isolating the flower buds in paper bags before anthesis. Subsequent fruit production was monitored until the dispersal phase. Nectar volume was sampled from ten bagged flowers with 2 ml capillary tubes and its soluble solids concentration was measured with a hand refractometer.

The presence and behavior of floral visitors were monitored by direct observation from early morning (approx. 05:30 h) to late afternoon (approx. 18:00 h), during 75 non-consecutive days along the years of study. Visits were monitored over approx. 40 h at each bignon species. The floral visitors were classified as pollinators or robbers/thieves (sensu Dafni 1992; Inouye 1980). The visitors were collected and identified. For each visitor species, the abundance was registered considering the number of recorded visits. For each bignon, the visitors relative abundance (RA) was calculated based on the total number of recorded visits. The visitors were considered common or occasional legitimate pollinators or robbers/thieves based on behavior and RA. The plant species were compared in relation to floral visitors presence/absence and its behavior as pollinators or robbers/thieves.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Arrabidaea brachypoda and Jacaranda oxyphylla bloomed both in the dry and rainy seasons; the other species bloomed in the rainy season only (Fig. 1). There was partial overlapping of blooming periods, especially between species in the same vegetation type (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Anthesis was similar for all the species, starting around 06:00 h. At this time, for all the species, the stigma was receptive and the four anthers were dehisced. Flowers fell from the plants approx. 24 h after opening in Arrabidaea and after 36 h in Jacaranda.

 

 

 

 

Arrabidaea and Jacaranda have a dorsiventrally compressed gullet corolla (sensu Faegri and Pijl 1979), with membranous texture. Essential floral traits are summarized in Table 1. In open flowers, the lip shows two superior reflexed lobes and three inferior lobes that extend horizontally in the same plane as the corolla tube. In all the five species, the inferior portion of the corolla has two longitudinal folds from the fauces to the constricted region near the base of the corolla tube, forming a furrow of more intense color. This may be considered a nectar guide due to its structure and color (Kevan 1979).

In all the five species, a nectariferous disk was located at the base of the ovary and produced nectar. Nectar was more abundant in Arrabidaea species (Table 1). In Jacaranda, nectar was viscous and scarce and did not accumulate at the base of the corolla. For all the species, the style was terminal and included. The stigma was bilobated with a larger inferior lobe. The stigma papillae were in the inner face of these lobes. The style lied along the dorsal surface of the corolla tube and the stigma was located directly above the didynamous stamens, which were also included and proximate to the upper corolla region. This disposition permited nototribic pollination in all the five species. In Jacaranda, the staminode was well developed and covered by many glandular hairs. This staminode reduced the inner corolla space. In Arrabidaea, the staminode was inconspicuous.

The five species have a series of floral traits characteristic of melittophily as described by Gentry (1974b) and Faegri and Pijl (1979). The flower colors and fragrances of all five species (Table 1) were attractive to bees, according to Proctor and Yeo (1973) and Kevan (1979). Nectar was the main reward for Arrabidaea visitors; the anthers position made pollen collection difficult. In Jacaranda, pollen was an additional reward for the visitors because at anther dehiscence some pollen fell on the staminode, making it more accessible to the visitors. Furthermore, this staminode could hinder access to nectar by reducing the inner corolla space. As a consequence, the visit duration and pollinator contact with the anthers and stigma increased. These events made the visits more efficient as reported by Walker-Larsen and Harder (2001) in melittophilous species of Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae) and by Bittencourt Jr. (2003) in melitophilous Jacaranda racemosa.

Arrabidaea brachypoda, A. samydoides and J. oxyphylla probably were self-compatible (Table 2), but autogamy was impaired because the position of the receptive surface of the stigma made spontaneous self-pollination difficult. In all the species, the stigma lobes temporarily closed after first contact with the floral visitors, which favored allogamy and hampers autogamy as described by Meeuse (1966) for other species with sensitive stigmas. A. triplinervia and J. decurrens were possibly self-incompatible as there was no fruit production after self-pollination (Table 2). Self-incompatibility seemed to be very frequent in Bignoniaceae (Bawa 1974, Stephenson and Thomas 1977, Petersen et al 1982, Bertin and Sullivan 1988, Gibbs and Bianchi 1993, 1999, James and Knox 1993, Bittencourt Jr et al. 2003, Bittencourt Jr. and Semir, 2004). Thus, the studied species could be considered as functionally allogamic, which is common among Neotropical Bignoniaceae (Gentry 1990).

 

 

Flowers of the five Bignoniaceae were visited by several species of bees (Table 3); all bee species were active predominantly between 07:00 and 15:00h. The abundance of some bees was mostly high especially in A. brachypoda and J. oxyphylla (Table 3) probably due to the grouped distribution of these species in the disturbed vegetation areas, and high number of flowers/inflorescence (Table 1). Most bees were common legitimate pollinators (genera Bombus, Centris, Epicharis, Euglossa, Eulaema, Megachile, Melitoma, and Thygater).

They were of medium to large size, principally nectar collectors and visited the flowers nototribically. These bees were considered efficient pollinators because of their abundance at the flowers and also because they could easily contact anthers and stigmas. Species of Bombus, Centris, Epicharis and Eulaema (Barros 2001, Bittencourt Jr. 2003) and Euglossa (Bittencourt Jr. 2003) were also reported to be efficient pollinators of Tabebuia. Species of Bombus, Centris and Xylocopa were considered as the main pollinators of the Bignoniaceae family at cerrado vegetation (Silberbauer-Gottsberger and Gottsberger 1988). Nevertheless, at Arrabidaea and Jacaranda flowers, Xylocopa was never observed performing legitimate visits (Table 3).

There was also occasional legitimate pollination (Table 3) performed by the small and medium-sized pollen-foraging bees (Augochlora, Ceratina sp 2, Chloralictus, Exomalopsis, Epicharis (Epicharitides) sp., Mesoplia, and Trigona hyalenata), which collected pollen directly from the anthers, occasionally touching the stigma. Among the visitors, there were two larceny groups: robbers and thieves. Robbers were large and medium-sized bees that collected nectar by perforating the corolla base (Xylocopa sp., X. frontalis, X. macrops, X. virescens and Oxaea flavescens). The same larceny behavior was registered for Xylocopa sp. in Jacaranda racemosa and species of Tabebuia (Bittencourt Jr. 2003) and for Oxaea flavescens in species of Tabebuia (Bittencourt Jr. 2003). Thieves were small and medium-sized bees that collected pollen directly from the anthers, never touching the stigma receptive surface (Paratrigona, Trigona spinipes, and Ceratina sp 1). Trigona spinipes was likewise observed thieving Tabebuia flowers (Barros 2001, Bittencourt Jr. 2003).

Arrabidaea brachypoda had the greatest richness of bee visitors (15 species) and J. decurrens the lowest (5 species) (Table 3). The other plants showed intermediate values: 8 species for A. triplinervia and J. oxyphylla, and 9 species for A. samydoides. A. brachypoda and J. oxyphylla had the same number of common legitimate visitors (5 species). However, the total richness was higher for A. brachypoda considering that five occasional legitimate visitors also visited it whereas J. oxyphylla was visited by only one (Table 3). The pollinators richness can be related to reward offer, because A. brachypoda and J. oxyphylla have large inflorescences and formed dense populations at the studied sites (Table 1). Furthermore, they were possibly more accessible as they occurred preferentially in sparsely vegetated cerrado areas. This pattern of resource offer was generally associated with pollination by different bee species (Frankie 1976).

The five Bignoniaceae could be classified as non-promiscuous (sensu Percival 1965), as the floral characteristic gullet corolla and the location of the stamens restricted the access to rewards to certain groups of visitors. Most of the pollinators in this study were long tongued medium sized to large bees (Table 3) that according to Baker and Hurd (1968), Stebbins (1970) and Faegri and Pijl (1979) showed adaptive relationships with tubular flowers during their evolutionary history. According to Gentry (1990) and Endress (1994), these bees were the main pollinators of melittophillous Bignoniaceae.

For four of the studied species, there were more pollinating species of bees than robbing species; only A. samydoides had more robbing than legitimately visiting bee species with high RA (Table 3). Its shallow bowl-shaped calyx (Table 1) was probably not a barrier to the robbing bees; the other Arrabidaea species have long tubular calyces, which probably provided better protection against the robbers. The lowest robbers richness was seen in Jacaranda. This was possibly due to the lack of available nectar in the flowers (Table 1) and to the hairy staminode that made the access to the floral tube difficult. The results showed that each Bignoniaceae had a particular set of pollinators (Table 3). Some overlapping occurred between J. oxyphylla and A. brachypoda, which presented Bombus atratus in common, and between the three Arrabidaea species in relation to Epicharis sp. Jacaranda decurrens was very different by presenting a unique set of visitors.

The results indicated that there was very little overlapping in the species of bees between any of the bignons even though the plants were all melittophilous and had very similar floral morphologies. The differences between plants lied, probably, in the accessibility and quality of the nectar. This feature needs further investigation. There are phenological and habitat differences between some of the species as well, but even when species flower at the same time in the same habitat, they attract different suites of bees. This can be an evolutionary consequence of competition to reduce the negative interaction between coexisting species (Stone et al. 1998). It is well known that to avoid competition plants may differ in the pollinators they recruit and so have independent pollen vectors (Heinrich 1976, Pleasants 1980, Rathcke 1988). Therefore, for the studied plants, the interference in pollination seemed to be minimized mainly as a result of interspecific differences in flower visitor assemblages and less by phenological strategy or seasonality as pointed out by Gentry (1974a, 1990) in Neotropical melittophilous Bignoniaceae.

 

AKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. João Maria Franco de Camargo, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, for bees identification.

 

REFERENCES

Baker, H. G. and Hurd. JR., P. D. (1968), Intrafloral ecology. Annu. Rev. of Entomol., 13, 385-411.        [ Links ]

Barros, M. G. (2001), Pollination ecology of Tabebuia aurea (Manso) Benth. and Hook. and T. ochracea (Cham.) Standl. (Bignoniaceae) in Central Brazil cerrado vegetation. Rev. Bras. Bot., 24, 255-261.        [ Links ]

Bawa, K. S. (1974), Breeding systems of tree species of lowland tropical community. Evolution, 28, 85-92.        [ Links ]

Bertin, R. I. (1982), Floral biology, hummingbird pollination and fruit production of trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans, Bignoniaceae). Am. J. Bot., 69, 122-134.        [ Links ]

Bertin, R. I. and Sullivan, M. (1988), Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. Am. J. Bot., 75, 1140-1147.        [ Links ]

Bittencourt JR, N. S. (2003), Auto-incompatibilidade de ação tardia e outros sistemas reprodutivos em Bignoniaceae. Ph.D. Thesis. UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.        [ Links ]

Bittencourt JR, N. S., Gibbs, P. E. and Semir, J. (2003), Histological study of post-pollination events in Spatodea campanulata Beauv. (Bignoniaceae), a species with late-acting self-incompability. Ann. Bot., 91, 827-834.        [ Links ]

Bittencourt JR, N. S. and Semir, J. (2004), Pollination biology and breeding system of Zeyheria montana (Bignoniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol., 247, 241-254.        [ Links ]

Bittencourt JR, N. S. and Semir, J. (2005), Late-acting self-incompatibility and other breeding systems in Tabebuia (Bignoniaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci., 166, 493-506.        [ Links ]

Carvalho, W. A., Espíndola, C. R. and Paccola, A. A. (1983), Levantamento de solos da Fazenda Lageado. F.C.A. - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brasil.        [ Links ]

Dafni, A. (1992), Pollination ecology: a practical approach. Oxford: Oxford University. Press. p. 32-38.        [ Links ]

Dutra, J. C. S. and Machado, V. L. L. (2001), Entomofauna visitante de Stenolobium stans (Juss.) Seem (Bignoniaceae), durante seu período de floração. Neotrop. Entomol., 30, 43-53.        [ Links ]

Endress, P. K. (1994), Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 326-328.        [ Links ]

Faegri, K. and Pijl, L. van der (1979), The principles of pollination ecology. 3rd ed. London: Pergamon Press.        [ Links ]

Font Quer, P. (1979), Diccionario de Botánica. 7 ed. Barcelona: Editorial Labor.        [ Links ]

Frankie, G. W. (1976), Pollination of widely dispersed trees by animals in Central America, with an emphasis on bee pollination systems. In: Burley, J. and Styles, B. T. Tropical trees variation, breeding and conservation. London: Academic Press. p. 151-159.        [ Links ]

Gentry, A. H. (1974a), Flowering phenology and diversity in tropical Bignoniaceae. Biotropica, 6, 64-68.        [ Links ]

Gentry, A. H. (1974b), Coevolutionary patterns in Central American Bignoniaceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 61, 728-759.        [ Links ]

Gentry, A. H. (1976), Bignoniaceae of southern Central America. Distribution and ecological specificity. Biotropica, 8, 117-131.        [ Links ]

Gentry, A. H. (1988), Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 75, 1-34.        [ Links ]

Gentry, A. H. (1990), Evolutionary patterns in neotropical Bignoniaceae. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard., 55, 118-129.        [ Links ]

Gibbs, P. E. and Bianchi, M. (1993), Post-pollination events in species of Chorisia (Bombacaceae) and Tabebuia (Bignoniaceae) with late-acting self-incompatibility. Bot. Acta, 106, 64-71.        [ Links ]

Gibbs, P. E. and Bianchi, M. (1999). Does late-acting self-incompatibility (LSI) show family clustering? Two more species of Bignoniaceae with LSI: Dolichandra cynanchoides and Tabebuia nodosa. Ann. Bot., 84, 449-457.        [ Links ]

Gobatto-Rodrigues, A. A. and Stort, M. N. S. (1992). Biologia floral e reprodução de Pyrostegia venusta (Ker- Gawl) Miers (Bignoniaceae). Rev. Bras. Bot., 15, 37-41.        [ Links ]

Grombone-Guarantini, M. T. and Maimoni-Rodella, R. C. S. (1995), Levantamento florístico em área de vegetação residual em Rubião Júnior, município de Botucatu, SP. Arq. Biol. e Tecnol., 38, 917-925.        [ Links ]

Heinrich, B. (1976), Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology, 57, 874-889.        [ Links ]

Inouye, D. W. (1980), The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology, 61, 1251-1253.        [ Links ]

James, E. A. and Knox, R. B. (1993), Reproductive biology of the Australian species of the genus Pandorea (Bignoniaceae). Austr. J. of Bot., 41, 611-626.        [ Links ]

Kevan, P. G. (1979), Vegetation and floral colors revealed by ultraviolet light: interpretational difficulties for functional significance. Am. J. Bot., 66, 749-751.        [ Links ]

Lopes, A. V.; Vogel, S. and Machado, I. C. (2002), Secretory trichomes, a substitutive floral nectar source in Lundia A.DC. (Bignoniaceae), a genus laking a functional disc. Ann. Bot., 90, 169-174.        [ Links ]

Meeuse, B. J. D. (1966), The story of pollination. New York: Ronald Press.        [ Links ]

Percival, M. S. (1965). Floral biology. London: Pergamon Press.        [ Links ]

Petersen, C.; Brown, J. H. and Kodric-Brown, A. (1982), An experimental study of floral display and fruit set in Chilopsis linearis (Bignoniaceae). Oecologia, 55, 7-11.        [ Links ]

Pleasants, J. M. (1980), Competition for bumblebee pollinators in Rocky Mountain plant communities. Ecology, 61, 1446-1459.        [ Links ]

Proctor, M. and YEO, P. (1973), The pollination of flowers. New York: Taplinger Publishing.        [ Links ]

Rathcke, B. (1988), Flowering phenologies in a shrub community: competition and constraints. J. Ecol., 76, 975-994.        [ Links ]

Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. and Eiten, G. (l983), Fitossociologia de um hectare de cerrado. Bras. Flor., 54, 55-70.        [ Links ]

Silberbauer-Gottsberger, I. and Gottsberger, G. (1988), A polinização de plantas de cerrado. Rev. Bras. Biol., 48, 651-663.        [ Links ]

Stebbins, G.L. (1970), Adaptative radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. I: Pollination mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1, 307-326.        [ Links ]

Stephenson, A. G. and Thomas, W. W. (1977), Diurnal and nocturnal pollination of Catalpa speciosa (Bignoniaceae). Syst. Bot., 2, 191-198.        [ Links ]

Stone, G. N.; Willmer, P. and Rowe, J. A. (1998), Partitioning of pollinators during flowering in an African Acacia community. Ecology, 79, 2808-2827.        [ Links ]

Tubelis, A.; Nascimento, F. J. L. and Foloni, L. L. (1971), Parâmetros climáticos de Botucatu – precipitação e temperatura do ar. FCMBB, Botucatu, Brasil.        [ Links ]

Walker-Larsen, J. and Harder, L. D. (2001), Vestigial organs as opportunities for functional innovation: example of the Penstemon staminode. Evolution, 55, 477-487.        [ Links ]

Weber, A. and Vogel, S. (1986), The pollination syndrome of Deplanchea tetraphylla (Bignoniaceae). Plant Syst. Evol., 154, 237-250.        [ Links ]

Yanagizawa, Y. and Gottsberger, G. (1983), Competição entre Distictella elongata (Bignoniaceae) e Crotalaria anagyroides (Fabaceae) com relação às abelhas polinizadoras no cerrado de Botucatu, estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Port. Acta Biol. (A), 18, 149-166.        [ Links ]

 

 

Received: October 11, 2005;
Revised: May 18, 2006;
Accepted: March 19, 2007.

 

 

* Author for correspondence

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License