SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.53 issue5Modelling the steady state and dynamic conditions of a biotrickling filter treating styrene and acetone in airUse of vinasse and sugarcane bagasse for the production of enzymes by lignocellulolytic fungi author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology

Print version ISSN 1516-8913

Braz. arch. biol. technol. vol.53 no.5 Curitiba Sept./Oct. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132010000500029 

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

 

Studies on the electrochemical disinfection of water containing Escherichia coli using a Dimensionally Stable Anode

 

 

Isabel Celeste Caíres Pereira GusmãoI; Peterson Bueno MoraesII,*; Ederio Dino BidoiaI

ILaboratório de Pesquisas Ambientais; Departamento de Bioquímica e Microbiologia; Instituto de Biociência; Universidade Estadual Paulista; Av. 24-A, n.1515; 13506-900; Rio Claro - SP - Brasil
IILaboratório de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas para Saneamento Ambiental; Faculdade de Tecnologia; Universidade de Campinas; 13484-332; Limeira - SP - Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

The aim of this work was to investigate the disinfectant effect of electrolysis on chlorine-free water, artificially contaminated with Escherichia coli (CCT-1457) and to evaluate the bactericidal activity of electrolysis and kinetic behavior of a single-cell reactor, with a DSA (Dimensionally Stable Anode) electrode to develop a scaled-up system. A high-density E. coli suspension (106 CFU mL-1) was electrolyzed in this reactor at 25, 50 and 75 mA cm-2 for up to 60 min, at flow rates of 200 and 500 L h-1. Bacterial survival fell by 98.9% without addition of chlorinated compounds and a power consumption rate not more than 5.60 kWh m-3 at flow rate of 200 L h-1 and 75 mA cm-2. The process produced a germicidal effect that reached this inactivation rate within a relatively short contact time. Also, a solution of electrolyzed 0.08 M Na2SO4 added to the inoculum showed residual bactericidal effect. The efficiency of disinfection was regulated by both the contact time and current density applied, and a kinetic function for the survival rate was developed for the purpose of scaling up.

Key words: E. coli inactivation, electrochemical treatment, electrolysis of microorganisms, electroxidation process, bactericidal effect, DSA oxide electrode


RESUMO

Água contaminada é uma das maiores origens de doenças em seres humanos. Em todo o mundo, a cloração é o método mais utilizado para promover desinfecção em águas de abastecimento devido ao seu efeito residual, quando adequadamente calculado. Contudo, se a água apresentar matéria orgânica, pode haver a geração de organoclorados, os quais são genotóxicos e carcinogênicos. Sob esta óptica, investigamos o efeito bactericida da aplicação da eletrólise em água sem cloro contaminada com Escherichia coli (CCT-1457). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o poder de desinfecção e o comportamento cinético da eletrólise realizada em reator de compartimento único e usando eletrodos ADE (Anodo Dimensionalmente Estável), visando ampliação de escala. Uma suspensão contendo elevada concentração de E. coli (106 UFC mL-1) foi submetida ao tratamento no reator em 25, 50 e 75 mA cm-2 durante 60 min, em vazões de 200 e 50 Lh-1. A taxa de inativação foi aproximadamente 99% para a solução isenta de compostos clorados, com consumo de energia elétrica menor que 5,60 kWh m-3 em 200 L h-1 e 75 mA cm-2. Uma solução de Na2SO4 0,08M eletrolisada e adicionada posteriormente ao inoculo apresentou efeito residual bactericida. A eficiência da desinfecção foi regida pelo tempo de contato e pela densidade de corrente aplicada, e foi realizado um estudo cinético que permite a ampliação de escala.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

In general, the microbial cell can be damaged as a consequence of adverse conditions, such as osmotic pressure difference, electric field, desiccation, heating, chilling, chemicals, oxidants or ultraviolet radiation. Based on such mechanisms, many of drinking water treatment systems have been developed and tested, using osmosis, flocculation, UV light irradiation (Kalisvaart, 2004), ultrasonic irradiation, ozone, hydrogen peroxide, photolysis, homogeneous and heterogeneous photocatalysis, radiolysis, biocidal agents, high-voltage pulses (Lubicki and Jayaram, 1997), electrohydraulic discharges, electrolysis, and combined techniques. However, recent research has shown that some treatment methods, such as chlorination and UV radiation with low-pressure lamps, are not fully efficient, as some pathogens are capable of "reactivation" or "recovery"; these include Escherichia coli, Campylobacter jejuni, enteric viruses such as rotavirus, calicivirus, and astrovirus and the parasites Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia lamblia and microsporidia (Szewzyk et al., 2000). Moreover, the chlorination of drinking water may affect its taste and odor and generate hazardous oxidation by-products during the treatment, mainly chloramines and trihalomethanes (THM). These chemicals are established mutagens and carcinogens, arising from reactions between chlorine and amines or chlorine and organic matter, respectively, and mainly affect the gastrointestinal tract (Kimbrough and Suffet, 2002). Also, long-time exposure to chlorite causes anemia and a significant increase in methaemoglobinemia (Condie, 1990).

Electrochemical treatment is an efficient method for the removal of pathogens. The method was used for disinfection in food processing from neutral electrolyzed water containing active chlorine (Deza et al., 2003), to promote the inactivation of Legionella in circulating water with 0.1% NaCl used in cultivation of germinated brown rice (Feng et al., 2004) and in medical applications (Tsuji et al., 2000). Diao et al. (2004) tested E. coli disinfection by various treatments, including chlorination, ozonation, Fenton reaction and electrochemical disinfection using 500 mg L-1 of NaCl as electrolyte. Scanning electron microscopy analysis suggested that the electrochemical treatment had a greater effect than the other disinfection processes examined.

Various electrode materials have been tested for electrochemical water disinfection, with a focus on the applied cell potentials and killing mechanisms. Experiments comparing the performance of anodic materials have been carried out with oxide electrodes (Inazaki et al., 2004; Bergmann and Koparal, 2005), titanium nitride (Matsunaga et al., 2000), carbon, activated carbon fiber (Matsunaga et al., 1992; Matsunaga et al., 1994), stainless-steel (Angelis et al., 1998; Regis and Bidoia, 2005), cast-iron (Bratfich et al., 1999), platinum-iridium (Nakajima et al., 2004), platinum-clad niobium mesh (Kerwick et al., 2005), palladium-coated carbon cloth (Sadamura et al., 2000), doped diamond (Panizza and Cerisola, 2005), etc. However, the most of these materials are only conventional for scientific purposes, but not available in large-scale or economically interesting for engineering applications. Also, most of the works are in batch mode, taking to fouling on electrodes surface. There are some other methods related to electrolysis or electrical current effects such as disinfection using metal ions generated by electrolytic processes (Khaydarov et al., 2004), electric inactivation of bacteria in sea water and saline wastewater (Park et al., 2003; Li et al., 2002) and electrolytic generation of biocides (Zinkevich et al., 2000).

Oxide-coated electrodes are used in many studies of electrochemical treatment of water containing organic pollutants and are known as Dimensionally Stable Anodes (DSA). The use of DSA in large-scale water-treatment systems is favored by the ready accessibility of this technology from the chlorine-alkali industry, where they are employed in electrolyzers.

Electrolytic treatment can help the chlorination process because the addition of large amount of chemicals is not necessary. The process is easy to automate, versatile, requires only a small area of treatment plant and can have low cost. The number of applications of electrolysis with oxide-coated electrodes is growing, for example, in municipal water treatment plant, pharmaceutical effluent remediation, oil refinery waste, landfill leachate and others (Inazaki et al., 2004; Moraes and Bertazzoli, 2005). Besides the advantages to public health of not requiring the addition of potentially toxic chemicals, it is an especially clean process, since the electron is the main reactant.

The aim of this work was design and test a one-cell electrochemical reactor for the treatment of water artificially contaminated with E. coli. Also, system's efficacy through electrochemical effect exclusively in the absence of chlorine compounds was studied.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacteria and culture

Gram-negative E. coli (CCT-1457) was used as a model for disinfection studies. The cells were cultured aerobically at 35ºC. Before tests, a 1 mL aliquot was transferred to 100 mL of nutrient broth, which consisted of 3 g beef extract, 10 g peptone and 1.5 sodium chloride in 1000 mL water (Difco, 1998). The culture was shaken in a B.O.D. incubator (Marconi model MA403) at 28ºC for 24 h. Aliquots of 15 mL of this culture were centrifuged at 80 rpm for 10 min, washed in deionized water containing 0.08M Na2SO4 (Merck P.A.) and resuspended in 15 mL of Na2SO4 solution, to give the inoculum for disinfection tests.

To determine the cell number, the inoculum suspensions were serially diluted and suitable dilutions spread uniformly on a nutrient agar plate. After 72 h incubation at 37ºC, the colonies were counted and the initial number of bacteria was calculated from the dilution and volume plated. In all counts, at least three replicate plates were used.

Culture in buffered solution

Cells were cultured as described in 2.1 for the buffered solution test, except that 0.1M phosphate buffer was used to wash the cells and as the reactor medium. The sterile 0.1M phosphate-buffered solution (pH 7.0, chloride-free) was prepared from 20.699 g NaH2PO4.H2O (Merck P.A.) plus 21.310 g Na2HPO4 (Merck P.A.) in 3 L of deionized water. This solution presented a conductivity of 5.39 mS cm-1 .

Solution of electrolyzed Na2SO4 (0.08 M) added to the inoculum to test residual effect

In these tests, 3 L of deionized water containing 0.08M Na2SO4 (Merck P.A.) was electrolyzed for 60 min at 75 mA cm-2 and a flow rate of 200 Lh-1 . After electrolysis, 8 mL of this solution was added to 2 mL of E. coli suspension (approximately 106 cells) in 0.08 M Na2SO4 in a test tube. Aliquots were taken at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. The initial conductivity was 8.30 mS cm-1 .

Apparatus

A schematic diagram of the treatment system is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a single-compartment electrochemical reactor, a hydraulic pump to circulate the solution, a flow meter, a 5 L reservoir, pipes and valves. The components of the electrolytic cell were housed in a metal structure of dimensions 0.7 mx 0.4 mx 1.0 m(l x w x h). The apparatus was operated in batch recirculation mode and all the experimental runs were carried out with 3 L of solution.

Electrolysis was performed with a low-voltage power source (Dawer FCC -3005D), a DSA rectangular electrode of titanium (reaction area 40 cm2), coated with an oxide layer of 70%TiO2 and 30%RuO2 (w/w), and a stainless-steel 304 cathode (3 mm from anode) installed in the single-compartment reactor made of PVC plates. The DSA is designed for high mechanical strength, high physical and chemical stability over a wide pH-range and insolubility in aqueous media, so that it has a long operational life and is not toxic

Preparation of solutions and analytical procedures

Cell suspensions for electrolysis were obtained by adding 2 mL of inoculum to 3 L of deionized water containing 200 mg L-1 of Na2SO4, giving an initial density of ~106 cells mL-1 in the circulating system. No other reactants were added to the solution prior to the experiments. The suspensions of bacterial cells were initially electrolyzed at constant current densities of 25, 50 and 75 mA cm-2 (corresponding to direct currents of 1 A, 2 A and 3 A respectively), at the flow rates of 200 L h-1 and 500 L h-1 in batch recirculation mode. Samples were collected during the runs at 0, 5, 15, 30, 45, 60 min and the pH, conductivity, temperature and colony forming units (CFU mL-1) were determined. Survival rate was defined as (viable count after electrolysis at a determined time)/(viable count before electrolysis) x 100. All the samples, including the control sample (t0), were counted randomly after electrolytic treatment.

Electrolysis experiments were carried out initially in unbuffered solution with chlorine-free 0.08 M sodium sulphate, to determine the inactivation efficacy of the reactor without the generation of chlorine. The current densities and flow rate were varied. Also, the influence of pH on the inactivation rate was studied, by using 0.1 M phosphate buffer to avoid pH changes during the experiment. All the reagents were P.A. grade.

Analyses

The pH was measured with a UB-10 pH meter (Denver Instrument) and conductivity with a CA 150 conductivity meter (Tecnopon Ltd). The temperature was taken with a mercury thermometer and colonies were counted on a CP-600 colony counter (Tecnal Ltd).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Electrochemical disinfection of unbuffered solution

The effects of various current densities on the survival rate of E. coli (at a flow rate of 200 L h-1) are shown in Figure 2. As expected, current density played an important role in the final viability of the cells. E. coli inactivation increased significantly with current density. Thus, 50% inactivation was observed after 60 min at a voltage of 3.7 V and current density of 25 mA cm-2 (power consumption rate of 1.27 kWh m-3), while at 50 mA cm-2 (4.60 V), after 60 min, the survival was reduced to just 10%.

At a flow rate of 200 L h-1 and 75 mA cm-2 the inactivation was 98.9% in 60 min, demonstrating that significant disinfection levels could be achieved without the generation or addition of chlorine. Figure 2 illustrate the normalized plot of bacteria inactivation as function of time. Considering an initial concentration of 8.80 x 106 CFU mL-1, the disinfection levels obtained were not sufficient for drinking water treatment. The low power consumption needed to achieve these levels was a notable feature of this system and it can be used as complementary method, reducing the total costs of treatment. Table 1 shows the flow rate (Q), current density (J), voltage (U), initial bacterial cell density (Ci), inactivation rate constant (k) and power consumption rate (ε) calculated for the experimental runs.

In order to test the influence of flow rate on the inactivation rate constant, the tests were also run at 500 L h-1 .

Electrolysis at 25 mA cm-2 and flow rate of 500 L h-1 reduced the survival rate by 50%, while at a current density of 50 mA cm-2, the viability fell 78% in 60 min of processing. In the experiment at 75 mA cm-2 (5.60 V), the survival rate of E. coli decreased by 85%. The Figure 3 shows the normalized plot of bacteria inactivation as function of electrolysis time.

The calculated values of inactivation rate-constant showed that this parameter was slightly influenced by the flow rate variation, better results being observed at 200 L h-1. However, in all the situations, higher currents values increased the disinfectant capacity and inactivated the bacteria more rapidly. The results obtained here allowed kinetic analyses to be performed, furnishing an inactivation rate-constant, which depended on the operational parameters such as current density, anode area, geometry and flow rate, and could be useful for process scale-up.

To evaluate the inactivation rates for the configuration used in this system, the kinetic study was based on data presented in Figures 2 and 3. The apparent first-order inactivation rate-constant (k), at a flow rate of 200 L h-1, was obtained from equation 1 (the decay curve for an exponential-like profile). Data were fitted to this equation and the correlation coefficients consistently exceeded 0.99. Thus, the solution of the differential equation for inactivation could be written as:

Where: C(t) is the viability in CFU mL-1 counted at time t, C(o) is its initial value, A is the electrode area (40 cm2), V is the volume of the processed solution (3 L), t is the treatment time and k is the apparent empirical constant of inactivation. The slope of the plot of ln(C(t)/C(0)) versus t is thus the kinetic constant for inactivation (factor -k A V-1). From this equation, k has units of velocity. From the k values and equation 1, it is possible to extend the scale of the system.

Similar analysis also showed a modification in the decay profile at a higher flow rate. While low flow rate recirculation led to first-order decay, electrolysis at 500 L h-1 resulted in zero-order decay (i.e. concentration-independent), after the first 5 min. Additionally, also was evaluated the linear velocity (ν) and residence time (τ). The ν was 0.37 and 0.93 m s-1 and the τ was 0.21 and 0.09 s for 200 L h-1 and 500 L h-1, respectively.

The calculated inactivation rate-constant is a characteristic of the system at the initial concentration range of 106 CFU mL-1 . To determine the global system inactivation rate, further tests must be performed with other initial concentrations, current densities and flow rates.

Electrolysis can generate a variety of oxidants in the presence of oxygen, including hydrogen peroxide and ozone, as well as free chlorine and chlorine dioxide when chloride ions are present in the solution. Such oxidants are responsible for most, but not all, of the lethality of the applied direct current (Drees et al., 2003). In this study, however, the inactivation of E. coli was not caused by chlorine, because the electrolytic medium did not contain chloride ions. The bactericidal agent under these conditions is believed to be electrosorption and direct electron transfer between the electrode and microorganisms. Similar mechanism disinfection was described by Jeong et al. (2007) which employed Pt anode in buffered solution. The microorganisms could come into contact with the anode surface, be adsorbed on it, and be killed electrically. Probably, irreversible permeability of cell membranes and/or electrochemical oxidation of vital cell constituents are induced by the applied electric field. Thus, when the flow rate was increased, the inactivation rate-constant was slightly diminished because a smaller number of microorganisms were adsorbed on the electrodes. A higher linear velocity results in a smaller residence time and consequently shorter contact time with the electrode, as detailed in Table 1. Residence time was evaluated as the ratio of the volume between the electrodes (0.3 cm x 40 cm2 = 12 cm3) to the flow rate. The linear velocity was calculated from ratio of the flow rate to the electrode area.

Also, it is assumed that the process is affected by the pH gradient close to the electrodes, due to the formation of hydroxyl radicals (OH) and, with lower probability, formation of disinfectant agents such as H2O2. Fóti et al. (1997) established that physiosorbed hydroxyl radicals, intermediate species produced by the anodic discharge of water, were also responsible for disinfection. During electrolysis, the discharge of water molecules at the surface of the metal-oxide anode MOx forms hydroxyl radicals that are physically adsorbed, in accordance with the equation:

Increasing the current density increases the rate of OH generation and pH gradient in the vicinity of the anode. Furthermore, optimal current efficiencies exist, which must be determined by the case studies for specific water qualities. Diao et al. (2004) achieved 99.98% of E. coli disinfection in the presence of 500 mg L-1 of NaCl using RuO2, TiO2 and ZnO2 electrodes, due to OH formation. Also, the mechanism of disinfection can be interpreted as an electroxidation, such as electrochemical oxidation of coenzyme A or destabilization of the cell by the transfer of charge. Many studies have reported proportionality between free chlorine and the bactericidal effects of electrolysis (Kiura et al., 2002; Nakajima et al., 2004). The present study showed that it was possible to obtain a bactericidal effect without addition of chlorine or chlorinated compounds using Ti/70%TiO2/30%RuO2 anode. However, the present work focused on the engineering characteristics of this system, verifying the sanitization effects of electrolysis, rather than on the mechanisms involved.

In the course of these experiments, there was no significant heating due to electrolysis. The temperature increased 5ºC at most; also, the pH change observed was around one unit and the conductivity practically did not alter. Since the solutions did not exhibit any marked rise in temperature or pH change following electrolysis, these factors were not responsible for the bactericidal activity.

Electrochemical disinfection in phosphate-buffered solution

As observed in Figure 4, when 75 mA cm-2 was applied at 500 L h-1 in the buffered solution, the E. coli viability diminished to 50% within 60 min of electrolytic treatment. As cited above, in the equivalent test with unbuffered solution, the fall in viability was greater, at about 85% in 60 min. In the experiment using buffered solution, the bacterial viability was thus affected significantly less, because the pH gradient was weaker and the inactivation of cells was probably due only to the hydroxyl radicals generated on the anode surface, or by direct charge transfer. The temperature had a maximum variation of 8ºC, and the pH has not changed, as expected. In all the runs, the variation in the conductivity was negligible. The flow rates values used were initially chosen to enable the use of the method on small-scale applications, and also for being well known that the oxidation of organic compounds in electrochemical systems was better at higher values of linear velocity.

During the electrolysis, bacteria can suffer oxidative stress, caused by the intermediates that react with oxygen, superoxide anions (O2•-), H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals, causing damage to proteins, nucleic acids and cellular membranes and culminating in cell death (Rincon and Pulgarin, 2005). Tolentino-Bisneto and Bidoia (2003) sugested that the discharge from the electrodes causes microorganism's death by cellular lysis due to the electroporation in the cell membrane.

Disinfection residual effect of electrolyzed solution

In the test using a sodium sulphate solution electrolyzed without the bacterial suspension and later added to the inoculum, the viability of the E. coli was around 52% after 60 min. (Fig. 5). The pH and the conductivity did not suffer significant change. In this case, cell inactivation was probably due to the action of oxidizing agents that produced a residual effect, because the cells had no contact with the electrode surface. Moreover, the percentage of unviable cells was practically equal to that of the electrolyzed buffered suspension; i.e., when the pH gradient effect near the electrode was minimized, the decrease in bacterial concentration was similar to that observed in the residual effect test. Obviously, based on the decline profile, a major removal of microorganisms would be obtained if the treatment period was larger than 60 min.

Despite its great effectiveness and potential, the killing mechanism of electrochemical disinfection using titanium oxide anode is still an unsettled issue. A number of theories have been proposed to explain the main bactericidal processes and increasing attention has recently been given to the role of free radicals, although more evidence remains to be collected. Jeong et al. (2006) studied the E. coli inactivation on boron-doped diamond electrode and in Pt anode (Jeong et al., 2007). The authors observed inactivation in two stages in a similar way to that observed in the electrochemical degradation of the organic pollutants. Kerwick et al. (2005) studied the inactivation of E. coli and bacteriophage MS2 using platinum clad niobium mesh anode and concluded that the OH radical was the responsible by the microorganism inactivation. The generated oxidizing agents and/or disinfection mechanisms presented by Jeong et al. (2006 and 2007), Kerwick et al. (2005) and Delaedt (2008) are not fully applicable to DSA anodes, which can promote selective oxidation for organics.

Delaedt et al. (2008) carried out tests using a commercial electrolysis cell equipped with coated titanium electrodes to study the residual effect of electrolysis on tap water containing 45 mg L-1 of chloride which contained 104 CFU mL-1 of E. coli. The residual effect led to complete eradication of cultivable E. coli when at least a free oxidant concentration of 0.08 mg L-1 was still present after reaction time. The authors did not state theory or mechanisms to explain the residual effect.

To conclude, the results obtained demonstrated that the electrolytic process operating in batch-recirculation mode, using a Ti/70%TiO2/30%RuO2 anode, was effective in decreasing the viability of E. coli (CCT-1457). The best results were obtained by applying a current density of 75 mA cm-2 . It was observed that increasing the current density and/or electrolysis time resulted in a rise in the inactivation rate. Raising the flow rate slightly impaired the E. coli inactivation. It was assumed that this sanitization process resulted from the damage caused by the pH gradient near the electrode and from the formation of free short-lived reactive species, such as OH. However, the inactivation levels achieved in 60 min were not sufficient to reach the drinking water standards.

The results showed that from relatively small-scale experiments, the application of modest cell potentials to DSA anodes enhanced the disinfection rates and the concept could be extended to reactors capable of larger-scale operation. Larger reactors can be produced simply by increasing the number of electrode cassettes and maintaining the power consumption rate.

Considering the number of cells inactivated by the electrolytic process, the proposed system could not be applied as unique treatment in 60 min of processing, but in combination with other methods, such as UV disinfection or chlorination. The present results implied that the techniques relying upon direct current to reduce the numbers of microbes in water could, following the optimization of the system by further studies, become efficient means of reducing the numbers of potentially pathogenic bacteria and ensuring the safety of the treated water.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to CNPQ, FAPESP; FUNDUNESP, DeNORA DO BRASIL Ltda and TIGRE Tubos e Conexões S.A. (Brazil).

 

REFERENCES

Angelis, D.F., Corso C.R., Bidoia E.D., Moraes, P.B., Domingos, R.N., Rocha-Filho, R.C. (1998), Eletrólise de resíduos poluidores: I - Efluente de uma indústria liofilizadora de condimentos. Química Nova, 21, 20.         [ Links ]

Bergmann, M.E.H.; Koparal, A.S. (2005), Studies on electrochemical disinfectant production using anodes containing RuO2. J. App. Electrochem. 35, 1321.         [ Links ]

Bratfich, O.J., Domingos, R.N., Angelis, D.F., Bidoia, E.D. (1999), Electrolysis of cell suspensions of Bacillus subtilis (ATCC-9372) and of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using cast-iron electrodes. Braz. J. Ecol. 3, 83.         [ Links ]

Condie, L.W. (1990), Toxicological effects associated with drinking water disinfectants and their by-products. In: R.L. Joley, L.W. Condie, J.D. Jonson, S. Katz, R.A. Minear, V.A. Jacobs, Eds., Water Chrorination Chemistry, Environmental Impacts and Health, v.6, p. 281. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers.         [ Links ]

Deza, M.A., Araújo, M., Garrido, M.J. (2003), Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of tomatoes by neutral electrolyzed water. Let. Applied Microbiol. 37, 482.         [ Links ]

Diao, H.F., Li, X.Y., GU, J.D., Shi, H.C., Xie, Z.M. (2004), Electron microscopic investigation of the bactericidal action of electrochemical disinfection in comparison with chlorination, ozonation and Fenton reaction. Proc. Biochem. 39, 1421.         [ Links ]

Delaedt, Y.; Daneels, A.; Declerck, P.; Behets, J.; Ryckeboer, J.; Peters, E.; Ollevier, F. (2008), The impact of electrochemical disinfection on Escherichia coli and Legionella pneumophila in tap water. Microbiol. Res. 163, 192.         [ Links ]

Difco Manual (1998), Dehydrated Culture Media and Reagents for Microbiology. 11th ed. Difco Laboratories: Sparks, MD, 862 p.         [ Links ]

Drees, K.P., Abbaszadega, M., Maier, R.M. (2003), Comparative electrochemical inactivation of bacteria and bacteriophage. Water Res. 37, 2291.         [ Links ]

Feng, C., Suzuki, K., Zhao, S., Sugiura, N., Shimada, S., Maekawa, T. (2004), Water disinfection by electrochemical treatment. Biores. Technol. 94, 21.         [ Links ]

Fóti, G., Gandini, D., Comninellis, C. (1997), Anodic oxidation of organics on thermally prepared oxide electrodes. Curr. Top. Electrochem. 5, 71.         [ Links ]

Inazaki, T. H., Pião, A. C. S., Bidoia, E. D. (2004), Treatment of simulated wastewater containing nphenyl-n-isopropyl-p-phenylenediamine using electrolysis system with Ti/TiRuO2 electrodes. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 47, 983.         [ Links ]

Jeong, J., Kim, J.Y., Yoon, J. (2006), The role of reactive oxygen species in the electrochemical inactivation of microorganisms. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 40, 6117.         [ Links ]

Jeong, J., Kim, J.Y., Cho, M., Choi, W., Yoon, J. (2007), Inactivation of Escherichia coli in the electrochemical disinfection process using a Pt anode. Chemosphere. 67, 652.         [ Links ]

Kalisvaart, B.F. (2004), Re-use of wastewater: preventing the recovery of pathogens by using medium-pressure UV lamp technology. Water Sci. and Technol. 50, 337.         [ Links ]

Kerwick, M.I., Reddy, S.M, Chamberlain, A.H.L., Holt, D.M. (2005), Electrochemical disinfection, an environmentally acceptable method of drinking water disinfection? Electrochimica Acta. 50, 5270.         [ Links ]

Khaydarov, R.R., Olsen, R.L., Rogers, S.E. (2004), Water disinfection using electrolytically generated silver, copper and gold ions. J. Water Sup. Res. and Technol.-Aqua, 53, 567.         [ Links ]

Kimbrough, D.E. and Suffet, I.H. (2002), Electrochemical removal of bromide and reduction of THM formation potential in drinking water. Water Res. 36, 4902.         [ Links ]

Kiura, H., Sano, K., Morimatsu, S., Nakano, T. Morita, C., Yamaguchi, M., Maeda, T., Katsuoka, Y. (2002), Bactericidal activity of electrolyzed acid water from solution containing sodium chloride at low concentration, in comparison with that at high concentration. J. Microb. Meth. 49, 285.         [ Links ]

Li, X.Y., Ding, F., Lo, P.S.Y., SIN, S.H.P. (2002), Electrochemical disinfection of saline wastewater effluent. J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 128, 697.         [ Links ]

Lubicki, P. and Jayaram, V.S. (1997), High voltage pulse application for the destruction of the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia enterocolitica. Bioelectrochem. and Bioenerg. 43, 135.         [ Links ]

Matsunaga, T., Nakasono, S., Takamuku, T., Burgess, J.G., Nakamura, N. Sode, K. (1992), Disinfection of drinking water by using a novel electrochemical reactor employing carbon-cloth electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 686.         [ Links ]

Matsunaga, T., Nakasono, S., Kitajima, Y., Horiguchi, K. (1994), Electrochemical disinfection of bacteria in drinking-water using activated carbon-fibers. Biotechnol. and Bioeng. 43, 429.         [ Links ]

Matsunaga, T., Okochi, M., Takahashi, M., Nakayama, T., Wake, H., Nakamura, N. (2000), Tin electrode reactor for disinfection of drinking water. Water Res. 34, 3117.         [ Links ]

Moraes, P.B. and Bertazzoli, R. (2005), Electrodegradation of landfill leachate in a flow electrochemical reactor. Chemosphere, 58, 41.         [ Links ]

Nakajima, N., Nakano, T., Harada, F., TANIGUCHI, H., Yokoyama, I., Hirose, J., Daikoku, E., Sano, K. (2004), Evaluation of disinfective potential of reactivated free chlorine in pooled tap water by electrolysis. J. Microbiol. Met. 57, 163.         [ Links ]

Panizza, M. and Cerisola, G. (2005), Application of diamond electrodes to electrochemical processes. Electrochimica Acta 51, 191.         [ Links ]

Park, J.C., Lee, M.S., Lee, D.H., Park, B.J., Han, D., Uzawa, M., Takahatori, K. (2003), Inactivation of bacteria in seawater by low-amperage electric current. App. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2405.         [ Links ]

Regis G, Bidoia E.D. (2005), Electrolytic treatment applied to the industrial effluent containing persistent wastes monitored by Bartha respirometric assays. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 48, 319.         [ Links ]

Rincon, A.G. and Pulgarin, C. (2005), Use of coaxial photocatalytic reactor (CAPHORE) in the TiO2 photo-assisted treatment of mixed E. coli and Bacillus sp and bacterial community present in wastewater. Catal. Today 101, 331.         [ Links ]

Sadamura, H., Kobayashi, S., Honda, S., Suzuki, N., Kogure, M., Hamashima, H., Kanzaki, Y. (2000), Electrochemical disinfection of microorganisms using palladium coated carbon cloth electrodes. Electrochem. 68, 321.         [ Links ]

Szewzyk, U., Szewzyk, R., Manz, W., Schleifer, K.H. (2000), Microbiological safety of drinking water. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 81.         [ Links ]

Tolentino-Bisneto, R. and Bidoia E. D. (2003), Effects of the electrolytic treatment on Bacillus subtilis. Braz. J. Microbiol. 34, 48.         [ Links ]

Tsuji, S., Kawano, S., Oshita, M., Ohmae, A., Shinomura, Y., Miyazaki, Y., Hiraoka, S., Matsuzawa, Y., Kamada, T., Hori, M., Maeda, T. (2000), Endoscope disinfection using acidic electrolytic water. Endoscopy 31, 528.         [ Links ]

Zinkevich, V., Beech, I. B., Tapper, R., Bogdarina, I. (2000), The effect of super-oxidized water on Escherichia coli. J. Hosp. Infec. 46, 153.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received: September 15, 2008; Revised: April 08, 2009; Accepted: April 21, 2010.

 

 

* Author for correspondence: peterson@ft.unicamp.br