Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Effect of tillage systems and permanent groundcover intercropped with orange trees on soil enzyme activities

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different soil tillage systems and groundcover crops intercropped with orange trees on soil enzyme activities. The experiment was performed in an Ultisol soil in northwestern Paraná State. Two soil tillage systems were evaluated [conventional tillage (CT) across the entire area and strip tillage (ST) with a 2-m strip width] in combination with various groundcover vegetation management systems. Soil samples were collected after five years of experimental management at a depth of 0-15 cm under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space in the following treatments: (1) CT-Calopogonium mucunoides; (2) CT-Arachis pintoi; (3) CT-Bahiagrass; (4) CT-Brachiaria humidicola; and (5) ST-B. humidicola. The soil tillage systems and groundcover crops influenced the soil enzyme activities both under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space. The cultivation of B. humidicola provided higher amylase, arylsulfatase, acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase than other groundcover species. Strip tillage increased enzyme activities compared to the conventional tillage system.

arylsulfatase; acid phosphatase; tillage systems; vegetative cover


AGRICULTURE, AGRIBUSINESS AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effect of tillage systems and permanent groundcover intercropped with orange trees on soil enzyme activities

Elcio Liborio Balota* * Author for correspondence: balota@iapar.br ; Oswaldo Machineski; Priscila Viviane Truber; Pedro Antonio Martins Auler

Instituto Agronômico do Paraná; C. P.: 481; 86001-970; Londrina - PR - Brasil

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different soil tillage systems and groundcover crops intercropped with orange trees on soil enzyme activities. The experiment was performed in an Ultisol soil in northwestern Paraná State. Two soil tillage systems were evaluated [conventional tillage (CT) across the entire area and strip tillage (ST) with a 2-m strip width] in combination with various groundcover vegetation management systems. Soil samples were collected after five years of experimental management at a depth of 0-15 cm under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space in the following treatments: (1) CT-Calopogonium mucunoides; (2) CT-Arachis pintoi; (3) CT-Bahiagrass; (4) CT-Brachiaria humidicola; and (5) ST-B. humidicola. The soil tillage systems and groundcover crops influenced the soil enzyme activities both under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space. The cultivation of B. humidicola provided higher amylase, arylsulfatase, acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase than other groundcover species. Strip tillage increased enzyme activities compared to the conventional tillage system.

Key words: arylsulfatase, acid phosphatase, tillage systems, vegetative cover

INTRODUCTION

Most Brazilian citrus orchards have been established using conventional soil tillage for limestone incorporation with subsequent maintenance of a clean soil surface because the permanent intercropped vegetative cover could compete with citrus trees for soil water. However, this soil management practice promotes erosive processes, especially in the initial period of orchard establishment (Corá et al., 2005). The use of groundcover vegetation between the perennial crops is indispensable to minimize the soil erosion, especially because about 50% of citrus orchards in Paraná State have been planted in soil derived from Caiuá sandstone, which has low clay content, low natural fertility and high water erosion potential (Fidalski, et al., 2007; Auler et al., 2008). The use of plants to cover the inter-row space between the perennial crops is one of the most efficient single practices for reducing soil erosion because this process acts upon the origin of the erosive process by reducing the energy of raindrops impacting against the soil surface, thus avoiding the disaggregation of soil particles and facilitating greater water infiltration. This process also improves soil chemical and physical properties (Chaves et al., 1997) and microbial activity (Balota et al., 2004; Rutigliano et al., 2004; Acosta-Martinez et al., 2010). Plant species used in such a management system must have the following characteristics: rapid development, high biomass production per unit area, high nutrient content, strong branching, a robust and deep root system and high capacity to mobilize soil nutrients and to fix N2 biologically.

Results obtained previously have shown the efficiency of superficial limestone used in undisturbed soil (Fidalski and Tormena, 2005) and the use of minimum tillage (strip tillage) in orchard establishment with permanent groundcover between orange trees (Auler et al., 2008). These practices do not have negative effects on soil chemical properties (0-40 cm) or on orange production. Soil microbial activity plays important roles in nutrient cycling and soil quality.

Soil organic matter decomposition is mediated by microorganisms, which produce enzymes that catalyze innumerable reactions necessary for their own metabolic processes, decomposition of organic residues, nutrient cycling, and formation of organic matter and soil structure. Most soil enzymes are produced by microorganisms and are able to accumulate, become inactivated and/or decompose in the soil, with considerable impact on nutrient recycling (Tabatabai, 1994; Dick, 1997). Soil enzyme activity can be used to indicate the intensity of certain biochemical processes because it is considered to be a major contributor to overall soil microbial activity (Badiane et al., 2001). Soil enzymes also have the potential to provide a unique integrative biological assessment of soils due to their relationship to soil biology and their rapid response to changes in soil management (Dick, 1997; Badiane et al., 2001; Ndiaye et al., 2000).

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different species of groundcover crops cultivated between rows of orange trees and soil tillage systems on soil enzyme activities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental characteristics and soil sampling

The experiment was started in 1993 at Alto Paraná, northwestern Paraná State, in a sandy Ultisol soil (90% sand) classified as a Typic Paleudult and derived from Caiuá sandstone, with pH = 3.9 (CaCl2), 1.9 mg kg-1 of phoshorus (Mehlich), and 3.7 g kg-1 of organic carbon (Walkley and Black) in the surface layer (0-15 cm). It was installed in an area previously cultivated with pasture (Brachiaria humidicola) in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Each parcel was composed of 15 orange plants arranged in three planting lines of five plants each.

Two soil tillage systems were evaluated, conventional tillage (CT) across the entire area and strip tillage (ST) with a 2-m strip width, in combination with various groundcover vegetation management systems. The citrus cultivar utilized was 'Pera' orange (Citrus sinensis) grafted onto 'Rangpur' lime rootstock. The conventional soil tillage (CT) system were prepared by one disc plowing at 20-cm depth and two light harrowings for the planting of orange seedlings, while the strip tillage (ST) system consisted of soil preparation only within a 2-m strip, while the remainder of the area (5 m) was not disturbed. Each line of orange trees was placed in the center of the trilled strip. In the ST system, only 30% of the soil was turned over, leaving 70% of the area undisturbed retaining its natural vegetative cover. Before soil preparation, two tonnes of dolomitic limestone per hectare was applied to the total area. From 1996 to 1998, 3.0 tonnes of a mix of dolomitic and calcitic (1:1) limestone per year was applied to the surface soil without incorporation under the tree canopy and 1.5 tonnes was applied similarly to the interrow space.

The following treatments were studied: (1) CT and an annual cover crop of the leguminous species Calopogonium mucunoides; (2) CT and a perennial cover crop of the leguminous peanut species Arachis pintoi; (3) CT and an evergreen cover crop of Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum; (4) CT and a cover crop of spontaneous Brachiaria humidicola; and (5) ST and maintenance of the remaining Brachiaria humidicola grass (pasture). The groundcover vegetation was controlled by mowing as needed. The experimental procedures followed as described by Fidalski et al. (2007) and Auler et al. (2008).

Five sub-samples of soil were taken at a depth of 0-15 cm within each replicate under the tree canopy and in the center of the inter-row space during two seasons, late summer (March) and spring (October), from 1997 to 1998, five years after the beginning of the experiment. Fresh soil samples were sieved through a 4-mm screen to remove the large plant material and stored at 4ºC until analysis of microbial and chemical characteristics. Chemical analyses were performed according to Pavan et al. (1992).

Enzyme Activity Analyses

Amylase (EC 3.2.1) and cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4) were determined according to Deng and Tabatabai (1994a). The activities of arylsulfatase and acid and alkaline phosphatase were measured according to Tabatabai (1994). Arylsulfatase activity (arylsulfate sulfohydrolase, EC 3.1.6.1) was determined using colorimetric determination of pnitrophenol released when soil samples were incubated with p-nitrophenyl sulfate. Acid phosphatase activity (EC 3.1.3) was analyzed with a modified universal buffer (MUB) (pH 6.5) using colorimetric determination of p-nitrophenol released when soil samples were incubated with pnitrophenyl phosphate. Activities of arylsulfatase and phosphatase are expressed as µg p-nitrophenol (PNP) g-1 h-1. All enzyme activities were measured using a one-hour incubation period. All the determinations were made in triplicate and expressed on a dry weight basis.

Statistical analyses

For each treatment, data were averaged over the four seasons before statistical analysis by ANOVA to determine the effects of groundcover cultivation and sample position on the soil properties. The treatment effects were statistically evaluated by the analysis of variance using Tukey's test for mean comparison at P< 0.05. The relationships between the soil enzyme activities and chemical properties were analyzed by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Soil enzyme activities for each sample position were also submitted to regression analysis. The significant equation was chosen by F test (P < 0,05) that presented higher correlation coefficient (R2). All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS statistical package version 9th (SAS, 2002).

RESULTS AND DISSCUSION

Chemical Properties

The chemical properties of the soils after five years of experimentation due to different groundcover and soil tillage systems are shown in Table 1. The pH under the tree canopy was lower (from 3.8 to 4.0) than in the inter-row space (from 4.6 to 5.1). The acidification under the orange tree canopy was due to various factors, including the high quantity of fertilizer applied, nutrient leaching, and the high quantities of nutrients uptake by orange tree. The soil samples were taken near the edge of the tree canopy, at the site of the fertilizers application, where the acidification processes was higher. After five years, the groundcover cultivation and incorporation provided an increase in the pH of the soil. The organic matter addition to the soil contributed to the reduction of organic anion losses in the system and to an increase in H+consumption. The concentration of basic cations in the plant extract has been associated with the effects in alleviating soil acidity (Miyzawa et al., 2002).

The low Al saturation in the inter-row space can be attributed to the pH increase, which reduces the Al solubility through Al complexation with organic compounds. Several plants have the capacity to alleviate the soil acidity through watersoluble plant organic compounds (Meda et al., 2001). This chemical change is associated with the concentrations of basic cations in the plant extract, the higher the concentration the greater the effects in alleviating soil acidity.

The soil P concentration was higher under the tree canopy than in the inter-row space because P fertilizer was applied onto the soil surface without mechanical incorporation. For this reason, the P content accumulated with time. However, in the center of inter-row space, there was also an increase in the available P content. The CT-Bahiagrass increased about 142% the available P compared to initial content (1.9 mg kg-1). This increase might have occurred due to the P cycle through P redistribution into the undisturbed soil by different permanent groundcovers (Franchini et al., 2004).

Enzyme Activity

The average measurements obtained from the twelve samples (four seasons) indicated that the intercropping of different groundcover species influenced the soil enzyme activities, both under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space. In general, microbial activity in the inter-row space was higher than that observed under the tree canopy (Table 2). Amylase activity varied from 171 to 320 µg g-1 h-1 in the soil under the tree canopy and from 257 to 417 µg g-1 h-1 in the interrow space (Table 2). The CT-Brachiaria treatment showed higher activity than the other treatments, with an increase of up to 87% compared to CT-Arachis under the tree canopy, while in the interrow space the ST-Brachiaria treatment showed an increase of about 62% compared to CT-Arachis. Cellulase activity varied from 44 to 54 µgg-1 h-1, but did not vary with different groundcover species and sample positions. Amylase and cellulase activities observed were within the ranges reported in the literature; however, they were lower than those observed in high fertility soil (from 350 to 830 µg g-1 for amylase and from 67 to 220 µg g-1 for cellulose) in Brazil (Balota et al., 2004). These enzymes play important roles in nutrient mineralization because they participate actively in residue decomposition, providing readily available C for the growth of microorganisms (Deng and Tabatabai, 1994b). Cellulose is the most abundant compound in the biosphere, making up almost half of the biomass synthesized by the photosynthetic fixation of CO2. Mulching generally increases enzyme activities in the soils. With an increased supply of mulch, there would be an increase in the supply of readily available substrates, such as carbohydrates for the microorganisms. This leads to increase the glycosidase activity, because these enzymes play a major role in the the degradation of carbohydrates in the soils (Deng and Tabatabai, 1996). Arylsulfatase activity varied from 1.4 to 3.6 µg PNP g-1 h-1 in the soil under the tree canopy and from 6.3 to 11.6 µg PNP g-1 h-1 in the inter-row space (Table 2). Under the tree canopy, there were no differences among the groundcover species, while arylsulfatase activity in the inter-row space increased up to 84% in the CT-Brachiaria treatment compared to CT-Calopogonium.

Arylsulfatase activity levels reported in the literature vary widely (from 1.4 to 113 µgg-1 h-1 in many regions of the world (Acosta-Martinez et al., 2010; Silva et al., 2009). In Brazil, reported levels of arylsulfatase activity vary from 4.0 to 113 (Balota et al., 2004; Silva et al., 2009). However, the level of arylsulfatase activity obtained in this study was from 1.5 to 3.0 times lower than that observed in a nearby area of Paraná State under different soil tillage in clayey soil with high natural fertility (Balota et al., 2004).

The higher arylsulfatase activity obtained in the inter-row space compared to under the tree canopy, especially in the Brachiaria treatment, confirmed previous observations that mulching could significantly increase the arylsulfatase activity (Deng and Tabatabai, 1997). Large inputs of organic C via plant residues constitute a principal reservoir of sulfate esters, the substrate for this group of enzymes. Arylsulfatases are one of many types of sulfatases involved in the mineralization of ester sulfate. Most arylsulfatases are not constitutive enzymes, and their synthesis by the microorganisms may be controlled by the C and S content of the system (Tabatabai, 1994; Dick, 1997). Thus, arylsulfatase activity is dependent on soil sulfate content and nutrient content.

Acid phosphatase activity varied from 87 to 176 µg PNP g-1 h-1, while alkaline phosphatase activity varied from 13.9 to 40.8 µg PNP g-1 h-1 (Table 2).

The CT-Calopogonium treatment showed higher acid phosphatase activity (70%) than the CT-Arachis treatment under the tree canopy, while in the inter-row space, Brachiaria treatments (both CT and ST) showed 21% higher activity than CT-Bahiagrass. The cultivation of Brachiaria also provided higher alkaline phosphatase activity than other groundcover species. However, the largest increases were shown by CT-Brachiaria compared to CT-Arachis (168%) under the tree canopy and by Brachiaria (both CT and ST) compared to CT-Calopogonium (119%) in the inter-row space.

Results for acid phosphatase activity were consistent with those reported in the literature, which varied widely from 77 to 1165 µg g-1 h-1(Rutigliano et al., 2004; Carneiro et al. 2004). However, the phosphatase activity level obtained was from two to five times lower than that observed in another region of Paraná State under different soil tillage in clayey soil with high natural fertility (Balota et al., 2004). In the present study, acid phosphatase activity was about three times higher than alkaline phosphatase activity, which might be due to the acidity of the soil (pH from 3.8 to 5.1). This result confirmed previous findings that phosphatase activity was strongly influenced by the pH of the soil. Acid phosphatase prevails in acid soils and alkaline phosphatase prevails in alkaline soils (Tabatabai, 1994; Balota et al., 2004). According to Tabatabai (1994), either the rate of synthesis and release of phosphatases by the soil microorganisms or the stability of the enzymes are related to soil pH.

Phosphatase is the general name of a broad group of enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of both esters and anhydrides of H3PO4. Microorganisms are the most important sources of phosphatases in the soil due to their high metabolic activity and short lifespan. Acid phosphatases have been studied extensively because of their importance in soil organic P mineralization and plant nutrition and their optimum activity under acidic conditions (Tabatabai, 1994; Dick, 1997).

It is believed that phosphatases are produced when the available P content reaches the critical levels for plant and microorganismal growth (Tabatabai, 1994). For example, natural systems, such as forests, sustain growth without the addition of phosphate fertilizers, even with a low level of available P. In these systems, available P is controlled by the organic P cycling, in which microbial biomass is an essential component. On the other hand, in the agricultural systems, added phosphorus fertilizers may depress phosphatase activity.

The high variation in the soil enzyme activities due to different groundcover crops and soil tillage systems showed that these enzymes were sensitive to soil disturbance. The cultivation of grass increased the soil enzyme activities in the interrow space compared to the cultivation of leguminous species, by about 29% for amylase, 8% for cellulose, 49% for arylsulfatase, 21% for acid phosphatase and 80% for alkaline phosphatase. The large increase under Brachiaria cultivation was likely due to its high aboveground biomass production (up to 35 tonnes ha-1 year-1), which was about three times higher than that of the other groundcover species. This plant residue becomes a substrate for the microbial growth and enzyme production. An increasing supply of mulch increases the supply of readily available substrates, such as carbohydrates, for the microorganisms that produce the majority of soil enzymes. Large additions of groundcover residues increase the soil organic matter. This alteration of the organic carbon pool can also protect the soil enzymes through the association with organic and inorganic colloids, contributing to enzyme stabilization in the soils. Plant roots also stimulate the enzyme activity by creating favorable microhabitats (increased porosity, water and diversity of compounds) for the microorganisms (Dick, 1997).

The increase in soil enzyme activities could be due to the large amount of plant residues produced by the groundcover species. It has been observed that Arachis pintoi produces an average of 10 tonnes ha-1 year-1 (Perin et al., 2003), while Bahiagrass can produce up to 7.0 tonnes ha-1 year-1 of shoot dry matter. B. humidicola can produce about 15 tonnes ha-1 year-1 of dry matter biomass; however, it has the capacity to produce more than 35 tonnes ha-1 of dry matter biomass with the application of 120 kg ha-1 of N (Orioli, 2008).

Another important factor is the large amount of roots produced and recycled annually. The total root biomass of Arachis pintoi in the 30-cm layer was more than 17 tonnes of dry matter (Valentin et al., 2001). For B. humidicola, about 60% of the root system was concentrated in the first 20 cm ha-1 of soil depth, which contained 2.8 tonnes ha-1 and 5.4 tonnes ha-1 of root dry matter at the sites with one and seven years of cultivation, respectively (Santos et al., 2007).

In addition to the input of carbon to the soil from above-and belowground biomass, the soil carbon is contributed by the root exudates. In general, from 30 to 80% of net carbon fixed by the plants is transferred to the roots. Of this, from 23 to 80% is lost through the respiration and rhizodeposition in the soil (Whipps, 1990). Root exudates can contain more than 200 carbon compounds (Kumar et al., 2006), which are classified into various groups: water-soluble exudates (sugars, amino acids, organic acids, hormones and vitamins), secretions (polymeric carbohydrates and enzymes), lysates (cell autolysis, cell walls) and gases (ethylene and CO2) (Whipps, 1990). These compounds can be utilized immediately by the microorganisms, significantly increasing the diversity, number and activity of microorganisms in the rhizosphere.

The ST-Brachiaria treatment presented an increase of up to 22% in amylase activity compared to CT-Brachiaria in the inter-row space, demonstrating that the decreased soil disturbance (strip tillage) could improve the microbial activity. Conventional tillage (CT), which disturbs the soil to prepare the land, reduces the soil structure by degrading the soil aggregates. On the other hand, the lack of soil disturbance in strip tillage increases the microbial activity because it favors the formation and stabilization of macroaggregates, which provide the habitats for microbiota (Dick, 1997; Balota et al., 2004), increasing the microbial community.

Correlations

The enzyme activities were significantly intercorrelated, as observed in previous studies (Deng and Tabatabai, 1996; 1997; Balota et al., 2004). Arylsulfatase and acid phosphatase showed a strong relationship with the organic C (Table 3) and microbial biomass C (Figure 1). The significant correlations between the enzyme activities and organic C were likely due to the higher C levels supporting higher microbial biomass and thus more activity (Deng and Tabatabai, 1996; 1997). Furthermore, more organic matter provides better environmental conditions for stabilizing and protecting the extracellular enzymes.


There was a close relationship of arylsulfatase and acid phosphates with pH (r=0.93* and r=0.72*, respectively), as observed in some previous studies (Deng and Tabatabai, 1996; 1997; Balota et al., 2004; Mendes et al., 2003). However, some other authors have not found this relationship (Matsuoka et al., 2003; Carneiro et al., 2004), even though phosphatases are often closely correlated with soil pH, because acid phosphatases prevail in acid soils and alkaline phosphatases prevail in alkaline soils (Tabatabai, 1994).

There was a negative correlation between the acid phosphatase activity and extractable P (r=-0.65*), confirming the observation that phosphatases were stimulated when soil phosphate levels were low (Mendes et al., 2003). However, this correlation was not found in other studies (Balota et al., 2004; Carneiro et al., 2004).

The results obtained in this study demonstrated the responsiveness of soil enzyme activities to the changes in soil management practices.

CONCLUSION

- Various groundcover species intercropped with orange trees influenced soil enzyme activities both under the tree canopy and in the inter-row space.

- The cultivation of B. humidicola provided higher enzyme activities than the cultivation of Bahiagrass or leguminous species.

- Strip tillage increased the enzyme activities compared to conventional tillage.

- The cultivation of grass increased the soil enzyme activities compared to the cultivation of leguminous species in the inter-row space.

Received: December 16, 2009; Revised: August 09, 2010; Accepted: December 17, 2010.

  • Acosta-Martínez, V.; Dowd, S.E.; Bell, C.W.; Lascano, R.; Booker, J.D.; Zobeck, T.M.; Upchurch, D.R. (2010), Microbial community composition as affected by dryland cropping systems and tillage in a semiarid sandy soil. Diversity, 2: 910-931.
  • Auler, P.A.M.; Fidalski, J.; Pavan, M.A.; Neves, C.S.V.J. (2008), Produção de laranja "Pêra" em sistemas de preparo de solo e manejo nas entrelinhas. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 32: 363-374.
  • Badiane, N.N.Y.; Chotte, J.L.; Patê, E.; Masse, D., Rouland. (2001), Use of soil enzymes activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improve fallows in semi-arid tropical regions. Appl. Soil Ecol., 18: 229-238.
  • Balota, E.L.; Kanashiro, M.; Colozzi-Filho, A.; Andrade, D.A.; Dick, R.P. (2004), Soil enzyme activities under long-term tillage and crop rotations systems in subtropical agro-ecosystems. Braz. J. Microbiol., 35: 300-306.
  • Carneiro, R.G.; Mendes, I.C.; Lovato, P.E.; Carvalho, A.M.; Vivaldi, L.J. (2004), Indicadores biológicos associados ao ciclo do fósforo em solos de Cerrado sob plantio direto e convencional. Pesq. Agropec. Bras 39: 661-669.
  • Chaves, J.C.D.; Pavan, M.A.; Calegari, A. (1997), Adição de matéria seca e nutrientes através da utilização de plantas para cobertura em culturas perenes e seus efeitos sobre a reação do solo. Arq. Biol. Tecnol, 40: 47-44.
  • Corá, J.E.; Silva, G.O.; Martins Filho, M.V. (2005), Manejo do solo sob citros. In: Mattos Jr., F.; Pio, R.M.; Pompeu Jr,, J.; Negri, J.D., eds. Citros Cordeirópolis, Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, p.347-368.
  • Deng, S.P.; Tabatabai, M.A. (1994a), Cellulase activity of soils. Soil Biol. Biochem, 26: 1347-1354.
  • Deng, S.P.; Tabatabai, M.A. (1994b), Colorimetric determination of reducing sugars in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem, 26: 473-477.
  • Deng, S.P.; Tabatabai, M.A. (1996), Effect of tillage and residue management on enzyme activities in soils: II. Glycosidases. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 22: 208-213.
  • Deng, S.P.; Tabatabai, M.A. (1997), Effect of tillage and residue management on enzyme activities in soils: III. Phosphatases and arylsulfatase. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 24: 141-146.
  • Dick, R.P. (1997), Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst, C.E., Doube, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R. (eds.) Biological Indicators of Soil Health CAB International, p.121-156.
  • Fidalski, J.; Tormena, C.A.; Silva, A.P. (2007), Qualidade física do solo em pomar de laranjeira no noroeste do Paraná com manejo da cobertura permanente na entrelinha. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 31: 423-433.
  • Fidalski, J.; Tormena, C.A. (2005), Dinâmica da calagem superficial em um Latossolo Vermelho distrófico. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 29: 235-247.
  • Franchini, J.C.; Pavan, M.A.; Miyazawa, M. (2004), redistribution of phosphorus in soil through cover crop roots. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol, 47: 381-386.
  • Kumar, R.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, A. (2006), Plant roots and carbon sequestration. Curr. Sci., 91: 885-890.
  • Matsuoka, M.; Mendes, I.C.; Loureiro, M.F. (2003), Biomassa microbiana e atividade enzimática em solos sob vegetação nativa e sistemas agrícolas anuais e perenes na região de Primavera do Leste (MT). R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 27: 425-433.
  • Meda, A.R.; Cassiolato, M.E.; Pavan. M.A.; Miyazawa, M. (2001), Alleviating soil acidity through plant organic compounds. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 44: 185-189.
  • Mendes, I.C., Souza, L.V., Resck, D.V.S.; Gomes, A.C. (2003), Propriedades biológicas em agregados de um latossolo vermelho-escuro sob plantio convencional e direto no cerrado. R. Bras. Ci. Solo, 27: 435-443.
  • Miyazawa, M.; Pavan M.A.; Franchini, J.C. (2002), Evaluation of plant residues on the mobility of surface applied lime. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol, , 45: 251-256.
  • Ndiaye, E.L.; Sandeno, J.M.; McGrath, D.; Dick, R.P. (2000), Integrative biological indicators for detecting change in soil quality. Am. J. Alternative Agr., 15: 26-36.
  • Orioli, F. P. (2008), Antecipação da adubação nitrogenada na cultura do milho sob pastagem de capim Braquiária Dissertação de Mestrado, UnB, 72p.
  • Pavan, M.A.; Bloch, M.de F.; Zempulski, H. da C.; Miyazawa, M.; Zocoler, D.C. (1992), Manual de análise química de solo e controle de qualidade. Londrina, IAPAR, 40p. (Circular Técnica, 76).
  • Perin, A.; Guerra, J.G.M.; Teixeira, M.G. (2003), Cobertura do solo e acumulação de nutrientes pelo amendoim forrageiro. Pesq. Agropec. Bras, 38: 791-796.
  • Rutigliano, F.A.; D'Ascoli, R.; De Santo, A.V. (2004), Soil microbial metabolism and nutrient status in a Mediterranean area as affected by plant cover. Soil Biol. Biochem, 36: 1719-1729.
  • Santos, R.S.M.; Oliveira, I.P.; Morais, R.F.; Urquiaga, S.C.; Boddey, R.M.; Alves, B.J.R. (2007), Componentes da parte aérea e raízes de pastagens de Brachiaria spp. Em diferentes idades após a reforma, como indicadores de produtividade em ambiente de cerrado. Pesq. Agropec. Tropical, 37(2): 19-124.
  • SAS. (2002), SAS/STAT User's guide: statistics. 9th ed. Cary, NC, USA. SAS Institute.
  • Silva, L.G.; Mendes, I.C.; Reis Junior, F.B.; Fernandes, M.F.; Melo, J.T.; Kato, E. (2009), Atributos físicos, químicos e biológicos de um Latossolo de cerrado em plantio de espécies florestais. Pesq. Agropec. Bras, 44: 613-620.
  • Tabatabai, M.A. (1994), Enzymes. In: Weaver, R.W., Augle, S., Bottomly, P.J., Bezdicek, D., Smith, S., Tabatabai, A., Wollum, A. (eds.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbial and biochemical properties, No. 5. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, p.775-833.
  • Valentin, J.F.; Carneiro, J.C.; Sales, M.F.L. (2001), Amendoim Forrageiro cv. Belmonte: leguminosa para a diversificação das pastagens e conservação do solo no Acre Circular Técnica 43, Embrapa, p.17.
  • Whipps, J.M. (1990), Carbon economy. In: The Rhizosphere Lynch, J.M. (ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 59-97.
  • *
    Author for correspondence:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      15 Apr 2011
    • Date of issue
      Apr 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      17 Dec 2010
    • Reviewed
      09 Aug 2010
    • Received
      16 Dec 2009
    Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná - Tecpar Rua Prof. Algacyr Munhoz Mader, 3775 - CIC, 81350-010 Curitiba PR Brazil, Tel.: +55 41 3316-3052/3054, Fax: +55 41 3346-2872 - Curitiba - PR - Brazil
    E-mail: babt@tecpar.br