INTRODUCTION
Brazil has become the third largest producer and the world's largest exporter of chicken meat, with an annual production of 12.65 million tons and exports of 3.9 million tons in 2012 (UBABEF 2013). However, the development of PSE (pale, soft, exudative) meat has brought problems to the poultry meat-processing industry, and PSE is estimated to generate costs in the poultry industry of over US $200 million in the USA and over US $36 million in Brazil yearly (Oda et al. 2003;Owens 2009). Therefore, besides the economical need to overcome these problems, a proper management system to promote the welfare of these birds and to prevent stressful conditions that can lead to the development of meat color have become great challenges to the meat industry (Olivo et al. 2001; Barbut et al. 2008; Simões et al. 2009a, 2009b; Langer et al. 2010; Barbosa et al. 2013). PSE meat originates from a rapid decline in pH while the muscle is still warm during the completion of glycolysis, leading to the denaturation of myofibril proteins thus compromising their functional properties (Sosnicki et al.1998; Olivo et al. 2001) although, as in pigs, there are possible genetic connotations/implications (Paião et al. 2013). In addition, Droval et al. (2012) have recently reported that consumers can detect breast fillet meat color abnormality visually at the point of purchase and odd flavors after cooking it. In general, carcass cooling immersion applied by Brazilian companies consists of continuous passages in tanks (chillers) that contain cold water and ice. Brazilian legislation establishes the use of at least two cooling tanks in sequence, being the first the maximum temperature at 16.0 ± 5°C and the second at 4.0 ± 5°C, respectively. The immediate cooling of carcasses after slaughtering and evisceration are requirements set by Ordinance 210/98 - MAPA (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply) and they require that the maximum temperature of the carcass at the second chiller exit should be at 7.0 ± 5°C. For the carcass to be immediately frozen, in a sequence, this limit is 10.0 ± 5°C (Brasil 1998). Although various reports have been dealing with the interrelationships between pH fall and post mortem temperature storage (Alvarado and Sams 2004; James et al. 2006), in locoexperiments at the commercial refrigerated processing line are still needed in order to effectively inhibit the development of color abnormality thus improving chicken meat quality directly for the consumers. The objective of the chilling process is mostly to inhibit the growth of dangerous pathogenic microorganisms and the air-chilling technique is frequently applied in Europe whereas immersion chilling is generally preferred in Brazil.
Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate the establishment of glycolysis in chicken breast meat in loco i.e. under commercial slaughterhouse processing line conditions and to verify the formation of PSE meat throughout rigor mortis installation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sampling and refrigeration systems
This experiment was conducted in the spring of 2013, under commercial processing plant conditions, in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Cobb lineage birds (n=100 for each treatment), both genders, and at 47 days of age, were sacrificed according to industrial slaughtering routine practices as shown in Figure 1: suspended by shackles, electric stunning, bleeding, scalding, defeathering, evisceration, chilling, deboning and storing in a cold room. In addition, in Figure 1is shown the actual location of samples for collection for temperature (T), pH and color (L*) evaluation. For control samples (CS), eight periods of measurement were taken and seven periods of measurement were performed on refrigerated samples (RS). CS were left at processing room temperature, starting from 30.55°C ending up to 21.85°C after 24.02 h of storage. RS group samples started the T value of 34.82°C and final T value was 7.54°C under immersion treatment. Time for each carcass to travel inside the chiller was 1.05 h. Thus, the first location of samples taken was after 0.18 h post mortem (PM) and the last after 24.02 h PM, for both treatments. The RS group followed the usual slaughtering process, with cooling in ice water tanks at 0 °C. Samples were collected after evisceration and measurements were performed accordingly. Finally, samples were stored in a cold room (4°C) until the last measurement at 24.02 h of storage.

Figure 1 Flowchart showing a slaughterhouse typical processing line for breast chicken in Brazil and the location where samples were taken for analysis. After evisceration, the first measurement was performed for pH and T determination at 0.18 h PM until reaching the last measurement at 24.02 h PM for control and refrigerated treatment. * PM: Post Mortem; T: temperature
pH, temperature and color determination
Temperature and pH values were recorded (in duplicate) by inserting electrodes into the breast muscle, pectoralis major m., using the pH meter system (Testo 205). The Minolta CR400 colorimeter was used to evaluate color, L*(lightness), on the posterior surface of the intact skinless at three different sites of the same sample as described in Olivo et al. (2001). PSE or Normal meat classification was determined by the pH value and lightness (L*) and pH values ≤ 5.8 and L* ≥ 53, as PSE and pH > 5.8 e 44 < L* < 53 were considered Normal, as described in Soares et al. (2003).
Statistical analysis
The statistical results analysis was performed using the Statistica program for Windows 10.0. The Tukey test at 5% of probability (p<0.05) was used to determine significant difference for measurement period, for each treatment. The Student t-test at 5% probability (p<0.05) was used to determine significant difference between two treatments, CS and RS, in the period of 24.02 h PM. Data from the last measurement (24.02 h) were analyzed by the Chi square test (χ2) at 5% of probability (p<0.05).
RESULTS
The results on changes in pH and temperature values, as the chicken carcasses gradually became chilled in comparison to CS are demonstrated in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. At refrigerated conditions, at 0.18h PM the carcass T was 34.82oC ± 2.46 while the pH value was 6.33 before the chiller tank treatment. The second measurement onward was carried out after 4.35 h PM when the carcasses were immersed in a water/iced chiller tank at 0oC ± 2, when its T reached the value of 6.70oC ± 1.22 and the pH value measured was 6.06. Sequentially, at 6.35 h PM, the pH value was 5.92 and the T value was 9.76oC ± 0.73, while at 8.35 h PM the T value was 10.98oC ± 0.42 reaching pHu of 5.86 up to the last measurement. As expected, these results were different from those found in CS group which started with T value of 30.55o C ± 2.56 and a pH of 6.40. In this treatment, pHu of 5.94 was reached after 4.08h PM under the T value of 22.43oC ± 0.35, showing no significant difference in relation to the last measurement at 24.02 h under T value of 21.85oC ± 0.98.

Figure 2 The glycolysis profile of pectoralis m. from broiler chicken with the pH measured firstly in the carcass subsequently in the breast meat samples held at 0.18 h, 1.35 h, 2.02 h, 3.02 h, 4.08 h, 4.35 h, 5.02 h and 24.02 h PM aging in control samples (CS) and at 0.18 h, 4.35 h, 6.35 h, 8.35 h, 9.35 h, 10.35 h and 24.02 h aging in refrigerated samples (RS). Means (n =100). a-e significant different by Tukey test (p

Figure 3 Temperature (T) values measured firstly in the carcass and subsequently in the breast meat samples held at 0.18 h, 1.35 h, 2.02 h, 3.02 h, 4.08 h, 4.35 h, 5.02 h and 24.02 h PM aging in control samples (CS) and at 0.18 h, 4.35 h, 6.35 h, 8.35 h, 9.35 h, 10.35 h and 24.02 h PM aging in refrigerated samples (RS). Means (n =100). a-e significant different by Tukey test (p
Color is an important attribute for customer satisfaction at time of purchase (Droval et al. 2012). The L* value of the meat depends on the amount of light scattered. Swatland (1993) reported that an increased scattering of light due to denaturation of sarcoplasmic proteins and an increase in extracellular water were responsible for paler meat. In this experiment, as shown in Table 1, we followed the L* values in CS remained dark color with the value of 48.01 (±2.33) in samples 24.02 h PM and PSE meat was not detected, while for RS, the value for the same time was significantly higher 53.26 (±1.89) and occurrence of PSE meat was 30% significantly different by Chi squared test (χ2) (p˂0.05).
Table 1 Values of pH, color (L*) and PSE meat incidence for control samples (CS) and refrigerated samples (RS) measured at 24.02 h post mortem
Group Samples | pH (24.02h PM)* |
Color L* (24.02h PM)* |
PSE incidence (%) (24.02 PM)** |
---|---|---|---|
CS | 5.88a (±0.14) | 48.01b (±2.33) | 0b |
RS | 5.83b (±0.16) | 53.26a (±1.89) | 30a |
*Means followed by different letters in the same column differ by Student's t test (p?0.05).
**Means followed by different letters in the same column differ by Chi Squared test (? 2) (p?0.05).
DISCUSSION
Studies by Olivo et al. (2001) demonstrated previously, in an experiment carried out at 23oC, the breast meat samples from the stress broiler chicken group presented a pHu value lower than 5.7 within 15 min post mortem, and they realized that, under this condition, PSE chicken meat was developed. Glycolysis completion, in this case, lasted only 10-15.0 min, being the initial pH value of 6.04 and the pHu value was 5.5. Conversely, samples from the unstressed birds group displayed a higher initial pH value of 6.25 and glycolysis completion was relatively slow, reaching the final pH value of 5.65 after approximately 30 min. Stressed birds groups displayed completion ofrigor mortis twice as fast as unstressed chicken under similar temperature.
Under commercial conditions, as in this experiment, the relevance of temperature towards the glycolysis onset and the final pH values were determinant for the ultimate pH, and consequently, for PSE development. The gradual decrease of pH values from neutral pH values (Fig. 2) took about 4.02 h in CS and 8.35 h in RS to enter the pHu value, as illustrated in Figure 2. According to Sams (2001), when the animal dies, the cells gradually switch from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism. The production of lactic acid, the end product of this form of metabolism, also occurs with increased anaerobic activity, and accumulates in the muscle cells of the dead animal. This causes the pH to decrease near neutrality to an acidic pH of about 5.7, and reduces the activity of some of the ATP-producing enzymes, further reducing the production of ATP. In our study, the CS group reached the pHu value much earlier than the RS group, in the period of 4.08 h PM under carcass T of 23.43°C ± 0.35, while RS group showed a pHu value in the period of 8.35 h PM below a T value of 10.98°C ± 0.42. Zhu et al. (2011) found that broiler samples submitted to early post mortem temperature of 40°C almost reached the pHu at 3 h PM with faster glycolysis compared to the 0°C and 20°C groups. Other studies have also demonstrated the importance of temperature for the process of glycolysis, which affects meat quality. Earlier reports by Offer (1991), in pigs, reported that myofibril proteins denaturation before rigor is one of the main cause of PSE development, and, as hypothesized by Wilhem et al. (2010), this phenomena may have started even before the birds were slaughtered, while the animals were suffering thepre-mortem stress as the PSE meat incidence was observed at the beginning of the refrigeration and quantitatively noticed after the 6.50 h PM period, as observed in this experiment. Finally, a study carried out by Molette et al. (2003) verified that the pHu in turkey samples was reached earlier than the other groups using the highest temperature treatment of 40°C. In our study, the relevant amount of PSE meat was 30% for the RS group (Table 1). However, contrary to expected, no PSE meat was found in the CS group, indicating that at the T (from 30.5°C to 21.8°C) and pH (from 6.40 to 5.88) values, throughout the experiment, the meat proteins were not denatured thus keeping their functional properties, unless other unknown factors were present, as reported previously byVan Laack and Lane 2000 and Molette et al. 2003. Moreover, it is important to highlight a recent report by the Betti group (Chan et al. 2011a,b) stating that the refrigeration system can also develop PSE meat as observed in this work. These results demonstrated that the cold temperature plays a significant role in the completion of rigor mortis by delaying the ultimate pH value. The PSE incidence analyzed after 24.02 h PM was similar to those found by Simões et al. (2009) and Soares et al. (2003).
CONCLUSIONS
The results showed retardation of the glycolysis rate promoted by refrigeration treatments. Under these conditions, it seemed that PSE meat formation is induced by refrigeration since this color abnormality is not observed in samples stored under commercial plant room temperature. Thus, it is fair to speculate that PSE meat development depends on multifactorial causes, in particular, on plant processing management, including refrigeration systems. Further research is needed to elucidate the fundamental causes that seem to be related to the biochemical/physiological carcass behavior.