SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue1Population dynamics and extracellular enzymes activity of mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria isolated from semi-arid soil of Northeastern BrazilEvaluation of the antimicrobial activity of crude extracts and isolated constituents from Chresta scapigera author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Microbiology

Print version ISSN 1517-8382On-line version ISSN 1678-4405

Braz. J. Microbiol. vol.38 no.1 São Paulo Jan./Mar. 2007

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822007000100029 

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
SHORT COMMUNICATION

 

Cercospora apii causing leaf spots on two Brazilian toxic weeds: Solanum glaucophyllum and Xanthium strumarium

 

Cercospora apii causando manchas foliares em duas plantas tóxicas no Brazil: Solanum glaucophyllum e Xanthium strumarium

 

 

Fabiano Branco Rocha; Olinto Liparini Pereira; Robert Weingart Barreto*

Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa,Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Samples of two toxic weeds, Solanum glaucophyllum and Xanthium strumarium, bearing leaf spots symptoms were found. Cercospora apii was found associated to these leaf spots in both plants. These are the first reports of this fungus on these hosts in Brazil and its first report on S. glaucophyllum worldwide.

Keywords: Asteraceae, biological control, leaf spot, plant disease, plant pathology, Solanaceae


RESUMO

Foram encontrados plantas das espécies Solanum glaucophyllum e Xanthium strumaruium apresentando sintomas de manchas foliares. Cercospora apii foi encontrado associado lesões foliares em ambas as plantas. Estes são os primeiros relatos desse fungo nestes hospedeiros no Brasil e o primeiro relato de sua ocorrência em S. glaucophyllum no mundo.

Palavras-chave: Asteraceae, controle biológico, doenças de plantas, fitopatologia, mancha foliar, Solanaceae


 

 

Pathogenic fungi have been studied since the 1980s as a potential source of biological agents to be used against weeds native from Brazil (1,2,3,12,14)

Solanum glaucophyllum Desf. (=S. malacoxylon Sendt.) (Solanaceae), known as "espichadeira" in Brazil, is a South American shrub, that has a great importance as a toxic weed and is particularly feared by cattle ranches in the Paraguay Basin (Pantanal of Mato Grosso). Chronic intoxication by consumption of this plant causes calcinoses, (calcification on organs including cartilages and tendons), particularly in cattle, hindering the locomotion of these animals and leading to paralysis of the joints and death. This kind of intoxication can affect up to 20% of animals in infested regions. There is no treatment for such a condition. The plant is capable of producing new branches after stems are cut, which make eradication very difficult (11).

Xanthium strumarium L. (Asteraceae), known as "carrapicho-de-carneiro" in Brazil, is native to the American continent and, has a world wide distribution, especially in subtropics and temperate regions. It is a very important weed, particularly in wool production regions for the damage caused by its burrs. It also causes intoxication in animals. In Brazil it is particularly noxious in Rio Grande do Sul (10). Little is known about pathogenic fungi occurring on these two weeds. Diseased plants of S. glaucophyllum and X. strumarium were collected in Corumbá (MS) and Ronda Alta (RS), respectively. Such plants were attacked by a leaf spot fungus preliminarily identified as a cercosporoid fungi. Samples were taken to the laboratory for further examination. Slides containing fungi structures were mounted with lactophenol and lactofucsin. Structures were measured and compared to those of other fungi found in Solanaceae that also belong to Cercospora. Study of the morphology of both fungi led to the conclusion that both belonged to the same species Cercospora apii Fresen. (sensu lato). Morphology of the fungus was illustrated for the specimens obtained from S. glaucophyllum (Fig. A-B) and X. strumarium (Fig. C-D) and the morphology of the fungus on each host is described below.

 

 

Cercospora apii on S. glaucophyllum: conidiophores fasciculate, cylindrical, 3.0-5.0 x 54.5-142.5 µm, 3-8 septate, brown, smooth; conidiogenous cells subcylindrical, somewhat geniculate, holoblastic, 2.5-4.5 x 12.0-44.5 µm; conidiogenous loci 1.5-3.0 µm diam, darkened and thickened; conidia cilindric to filiform, 2.0-4.0 x 44.5-95.0 µm, 1-9 septate, base truncate 2.0-3.0 µm diam, apex sub-acute, hyaline.

Cercospora apii on X. strumarium, as above, but with the following morphologic (mainly biometric) differences: conidiophores 3.5-5.5 x 60.0-227.5 µm, 1-8 septate; conidiogenous cells 3.5-5.5 x 18.5-65.0 µm; conidiogenous loci 2.0-4.0 µm diam; conidia 2.0-4.5 x 36.5-262.5 µm, 5-24 septate, base with 2.0-4.0 µm diam.

The specimen on both hosts was compared with other fungi belonging to Cercospora (5,6) and it became clear that both fit well in the broad concept now accepted for C. apii. The report of C. apii on X. strumarium is novel for Brazil. Such host-pathogen association was previously known only from Cuba, India, Pakistan and USA (6). C. apii is here reported on S. glaucophyllum for the first time.

Fungal pathogens have a well demonstrated potential as biological control agents (7) for weeds. Cercospora and related genera are among fungal pathogens that have been evaluated and used in weed biological control [e.g: Cercospora echii Winter, Cercospora piaropii Tharp, Phaeoramularia eupatorii-odorati (Yen) Liu & Guo (8); Cercospora caricis (4,13)] but there are no records of the use of C. apii. It seems that under its present concept C. apii is a collective species containing both host specific and polyphagous forms and its use in weed control would require a thorough evaluation of host-range of any isolate. Defoliation of S. glaucophyllum in the field resulting from the attack of C. apii appeared to be severe whereas damage to X. strumarium did not appear very significant. The inundative/mycoherbicidal approach (9) would be more appropriate for biocontrol of S. glaucophyllum in Brazil but propagules of cercosporoid fungi are notoriously difficult to mass-produce and, therefore, it would probably be difficult to develop a mycoherbicide with C. apii. Its use in classical approach (9) against X. strumarium might be of interest in case a virulent and host-specific strain is found.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for financial support.

 

REFERENCES

1. Barreto, R.W.; Evans, H.C. (1994). The mycobiota of the weed Chromolaena odorata in southern Brazil with particular reference to fungal pathogens for biological control. Mycol. Res., 98(10), 1107-1116.         [ Links ]

2. Barreto, R.W.; Evans, H.C. (1995). The mycobiota of the weed Mikania micrantha in southern Brazil with particular reference to fungal pathogens for biological control. Mycol. Res., 99(3), 343-352.         [ Links ]

3. Barreto, R.W.; Evans, H.C.; Ellison, C.A. (1995). The mycobiota of the weed Lantana camara in Brazil, with particular reference to biological control. Mycol. Res., 99(7), 769-782.         [ Links ]

4. Borges Neto, C.R.; Mello, S.C.M.; Ribeiro, Z.M.A.; Malty, J.; Fontes, E.M.G. (2000). Influência da idade da planta, período de umidificação e concentração de inóculo no desenvolvimento de sintomas provocados por Cercospora caricis em tiririca. Fitopatol. Bras., 25(2), 138-142.         [ Links ]

5. Chupp, C. (1954). A Monograph of a fungus genus Cercospora. Ithaca, New York.         [ Links ]

6. Crous, P.W.; Braun, U. (2003). Mycosphaerella and its anamorphs: Names published in Cercospora and Passalora. CBS, Utrecht, Netherlands.         [ Links ]

7. Evans, H.C.; Greaves, M.P.; Watson, A.K. (2001). Fungal biocontrol agents of weeds. In: Butt, T.M.; Jackson, C.W.; Magan, N. (eds). Fungi as biocontrol agents: progress, problems and potential. CAB International, London, England, p.169-192.         [ Links ]

8. Julien, M.H.; Griffiths, M.W. Biological Control of Weeds: a world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, England         [ Links ]

9. Julien, M.; Write, G. (1997). Biological Control of Weeds: theory and practical application. ACIAR Monograph, Camberra, Austrália.         [ Links ]

10. Kissmann, K.G.; Groth, D. (1999) Plantas Infestantes e Nocivas. BASF, São Paulo, SP.         [ Links ]

11. Kissmann, K.G.; Groth, D. (2000). Plantas Infestantes e Nocivas. BASF, São Paulo, SP.         [ Links ]

12. Pereira, O.L.; Barreto, R.W. (2005). The mycobiota of Mitracarpus hirtus in Minas Gerais (Brazil), with particular reference to fungal pathogens for biological control. Australas. Plant Pathol., 34(1), 41-50.         [ Links ]

13. Ribeiro, Z.M.A.; Mello, S.C.M.; Furlanetto, C.; Figueiredo, G.; Fontes, E.M.G. (1997). Taxonomy, patogenicity and effects of different culture media and pH on the development of Cercospora caricis, an agent to biocontrol of Cyperus rotundus. Fitopatol. Bras., 22(4), 513-519.         [ Links ]

14. Yorinori, J.T. (1984). Biological control of milkweed (Euphorbia heterophylla) with pathogenic fungi. VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, Vancouver, Canada, p.677.         [ Links ]

 

 

Submitted: June 19, 2006; Approved: October 13, 2006

 

 

*Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Universidade Federal de Viçosa - Dep. de Fitopatologia - 36571-000 Viçosa, MG - Brasil. E-mail: rbarreto@ufv.br

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License