An alternative for the preadsorption step in the paratuberculosis serodiagnosis: Mycobacterium fortuitum

Mycobacterium fortuitum: uma alternativa para a etapa de pré-adsorção no sorodiagnóstico da paratuberculose

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY

SHORT COMMUNICATION

An alternative for the preadsorption step in the paratuberculosis serodiagnosis: Mycobacterium fortuitum

Mycobacterium fortuitum: uma alternativa para a etapa de pré-adsorção no sorodiagnóstico da paratuberculose

Carla Dray Marassi^I; Marley Silva^II; Walter Martin Roland Oelemann^III; Leila de Souza Fonseca^II; Paula Ristow^II; Walter Lilenbaum^I

^ILaboratório de Bacteriologia Veterinária, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil

^IIDepartamento de Bacteriologia Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

^IIIDepartamento de Imunologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

ABSTRACT

ELISAs for paratuberculosis employ a preadsorption step with Mycobacterium phlei to diminish unspecific reactions As M. fortuitum is one of the most frequent environmental mycobacteria, the purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate its use as an alternative for the preadsorption in ELISAs for paratuberculosis. Results suggest that M. fortuitum can be an alternative instead of or associated to M. phlei with comparable results (κ > 0.8) to conventional ELISAs using M. phlei as a preadsorption antigen.

Key-words: Mycobacteria, ELISA, M. fortuitum, M. phlei.

RESUMO

Ensaios de sorodiagnóstico de paratuberculose (ELISA) utilizam Mycobacterium phlei na etapa de pré-adsorção para diminuir reações inespecíficas. Uma vez que M. fortuitum é uma das micobactérias atípicas mais isoladas no Brasil, o objetivo central deste estudo foi averiguar a possibilidade de sua utilização como antígeno da etapa de pré-adsorção destes testes. Os resultados sugerem que M. fortuitum apresentou resultados comparáveis (κ > 0.8) aos alcançados com M. phlei e que, portanto poderia ser uma alternativa ao invés ou associado a M. phlei na etapa de pré-adsorção de ELISAs para paratuberculose.

Palavras-chave: Mycobacteria, ELISA, M. fortuitum, M. phlei.

Paratuberculosis is a ruminant infection characterized by chronic intermittent diarrhea with bacillary excretion in feces. It progresses through several stages and, in the majority of cases, takes several years to manifest with clinical signs (11). The diagnosis is difficult, due to the low sensitivity of the tests developed so far. Available immunological and molecular assays may not identify all infected animals, and they may give a substantial number of false-positive results (5). Due to the fastidious growth of the agent, Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis (Map), serological tests, mainly ELISAs, are widely used for diagnosis of the infection (4).

Since cross reactions with environmental mycobacteria were commonly reported in the first ELISAs (3), an absorption step of bovine sera with a suspension of killed environmental mycobacterium Mycobacterium phlei have been efficient for reducing such false positive reactions and therefore improving the test's specificity without reducing the sensitivity (3).

Some studies suggest that several atypical mycobacteria widely recovered from pastures could be ingested by cattle and possibly cause cross reactions in antibody tests for paratuberculosis (10). Those atypical mycobacteria have been demonstrated to induce humoral immune response in cattle that contribute to false-positive serologic reactions even in commercially available preadsorbed serum ELISAs (13). In Brazil, the most frequently isolated environmental mycobacterium is M. fortuitum, which is ubiquitous in soil in the South and the Southeast regions of the country, where dairy cattle breeding is more common (7). M. fortuitum has also been reported to be the most frequent mycobacterial species in soil of other countries, as Argentina (12) or India (6).

Lyophilized M. phlei is normally imported and is not easy to obtain in Brazil. Due to the difference in prevalence of environmental mycobacteria and their role in the specificity of diagnosis tests, a pilot study that uses a local strain of mycobacteria instead of, or combined with M. phlei was designed, to check if this alternative increases the specificity of ELISAs tests.

A panel of 10 negative and four positive sera selected from our collection was used. One positive and one negative control serum, kindly offered by Dr. Michael Collins (Wisconsin, USA) were also included. All animals that provided the positive and the negative sera had their status confirmed by bacteriological culture. All sera were tested by an ELISA test developed in our laboratory that uses protoplasmic paratuberculosis antigen (PPA) (8). This assay presented 100% sensitivity and 83.5% specificity, being comparable (κ >0.5) to commercial tests (9). Absorption of bovine sera was performed in three distinct ways: using M. phlei only, M. fortuitum only or a combination of M. phlei and M. fortuitum. With the exception of the preadsorption step, the exact same protocol, and a cut-off value of 0.35 was considered in all assays.

M. phlei-ELISA was performed as previously described (8). A lyophilized commercial M. phlei was reconstituted in saline solution in order to obtain a 5 mg/mL final concentration, according to manufacturer's instructions (Allied monitors- USA). Ten microliters of the suspension were mixed with an equal volume of suspect sera and incubated for 60 minutes at 37ºC with constant agitation. After that, the suspension was diluted in 1 mL of TBST (Tris (Sigma) 10 mM, 0.9% NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20), and incubated overnight at 8ºC. Sera and M. phlei solution were used in a final dilution of 1:100 each. M. fortuitum-ELISA was performed using a standard M. fortuitum strain (ATCC strain 6841) and cultivated as described in routine protocols (1). M. fortuitum was diluted as above in order to correspond to the commercial M. phlei solution (5 mg/mL) and used in the exact same conditions as described above.

In the M. phlei and M. fortuitum-ELISA, sera were mixed with a solution containing the same quantities of M. phlei and M. fortuitum that together presented a final concentration of 5 mg/mL. The protein concentration founded in 5 mg/mL of M. fortuitum was analyzed by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) analysis (Pierce BCA Protein Assays Kit, USA), which demonstrated that M. fortuitum solution presented a protein concentration equivalent to M. phlei commercial solution. In order to compare the protein pattern of M. phlei and M. fortuitum protein extracts, 5 mg/mL of each were separated by sodium dodeylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 12% gel.

In order to analyze statistically the experiment, Chi-square test (x²) was used to compare the different protocols. Concordance between protocols was calculated using Kappa test (k). Negative and positive control sera (one each), four sera of culture positive animals and 10 sera of culture negative animals were tested in three different conditions: as usual with M. phlei, with M. fortuitum and with a combination of M. phlei and M. fortuitum in the same concentration and volume, in the preadsorption step.

When the M. fortuitum preadsorption was used, four sera (two positive and two negative) plus the positive control serum presented lower ODs (Fig. 1) when compared to the standard assay (M. phlei-ELISA), possibly indicating a higher efficiency in eliminating unspecific antibodies, which could lead to cross-reactions with environmental mycobacteria and consequent false-positive results. In spite of the overall reduction on ODs values observed at the M. fortuitum-ELISA, three positive sera remained presenting much higher values (mean = 0.650) than negative sera (mean = 0.150), as expected (Fig. 1). Only one positive serum became negative with an OD value of 0.261 (cut-off = 0.35). This serum, when tested by M. phlei-ELISA, presented an OD value of 0.440, which is lower than the mean ODs of the positive sera used in this study. This same serum presented an OD of 0.489 when preadsorbed with the M. phlei and M. fortuitum suspension. This serum was obtained from an old cow that, in spite of being fecal-culture-positive and, consequently, presenting a PTB-positive status, might be immunologically sub-responding. Therefore, we classified the serum as being borderline. Statistical analysis revealed that, in spite of one serum having its final result altered, the assays using different preadsorptions demonstrated to be comparable (P<0.01) and no difference on efficacy could be detected between them (κ > 0.8).

On the other hand, two of the positive sera and four of the negative sera preadsorbed with the M. fortuitum and M. phlei solution presented higher ODs than with the standard assay. Nevertheless, with this preadsorption step, no serum changed its final status and correlation between both tests was also high for those samples (κ > 0.8). In spite of these differences, variation on ODs values observed among the three preadsorption assays was not significant (P< 0.01).

The inclusion of a preadsorption step employing M. phlei was mandatory for increasing specificity of paratuberculosis ELISAs without interfering in the sensitivity (3). Nevertheless, since atypical mycobacteria interfere with the results even in the preadsorbed commercially available serum ELISAs (13), other ways of reducing such interference must be achieved.

Protein patterns of both M. phlei and M. fortuitum were compared after separation by SDS-PAGE. This analysis demonstrated a very similar pattern of proteic bands. This finding suggests that some antigens may be shared between both microorganisms, leading to cross reactions. This is not unexpected, since it has been widely demonstrated that several mycobacteria species share proteins and other antigens (2). Therefore, it reinforces in a biochemical point of view the possibility of using M. fortuitum preparations as an alternative for the preadsorption step in paratuberculosis ELISAs.

M. fortuitum is a fast-growing mycobacterium with few requirements for its culture. It is also very frequent as a soil inhabitant in many countries and can be easily obtained and maintained by mycobacteria laboratories worldwide. Although only few sera were used in this study, these preliminary results suggest that M. fortuitum, alone or combined with M. phlei, may be considered as an alternative for the preadsorption step of ELISAs for paratuberculosis, with comparable results from those obtained with the standard assay that uses M. phlei at the preadsorption step. All the tested assays were capable to reduce cross-reactions with environmental mycobacteria and no significant difference was observed in the sensitivity or specificity of the assays in this study.

Submitted: October 25, 2007; Returned to authors for corrections: January 23, 2008; Approved: July 13, 2008

* Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Veterinary Bacteriology Laboratory, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brasil

• 1. Allen, B.W. (1998). Mycobacteria: General culture methodology and safety considerations. In: Mycobacteria Protocols Methods in Molecular Biology 101. Tanya Parish e Neil G. Stoker (ed), USA 1-15.
• 2. Bannantine, J.P.; Baecheler, E.; Zhang, Q.; Li, L.; Kapur, V. (2002). Genome scale comparison of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis with Mycobacterium avium subsp. avium reveal potential diagnostic sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol., 40: 1313-1310.
• 3. Bech-Nielsen, S.; Jorgensens, J.B.; Ahrens, P.; Feld, N.C. (1992). Diagnostic accuracy of M. phlei adsorved serum ELISA for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis in dairy cows. J. Clin. Microbiol., 30: 613-618.
• 4. Collins, M.T.; Wells, S.J.; Petrini, K.R.; Collins, J.E.; Schultz, R.D.; Whitlock, R.H. (2005). Evaluation of five antibodies detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 12 (6): 685-692.
• 5. Coussens, P.M. (2004). Model for immune responses to Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in cattle. Infect. Immun, 72 (6), 3089-3096, (110).
• 6. Kamala, T.; Paramasivan, C.N.; Herbert, D.; Venkatesan, P.; Prabhakar, R. (1994). Isolation and Identification of Environmental Mycobacteria in the Mycobacterium bovis BCG Trial Area of South India. Appl Environ. Microbiol., 60 (6): 2180-2183.
• 7. Leite, C.Q.F.; Anno, I.S.; Leite, S.R.; Roxo, E.; Morlock, G.P.; Cooksey R.C. (2003). Isolation and Identification of mycobacteria from livestock specimens and milk obtained in Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz, 98 (3): 319-323.
• 8. Marassi, C.D.; Fonseca, L.S.; Ristow, P.; Ferreira, R.; Lilenbaum, W.; Oelemann, W.M.R. (2005). Improvement of an ELISA for bovine paratuberculosis serology in Brazil. Braz. J. Microbiol, 36: 118-122.
• 9. Marassi, C.D.; Gonzaga, J.S.; Ristow, P.; Ferreira, R.; Fonseca, L.S.; Oelemann, W.M.R.; Lilenbaum, W. (2007). Comparison of an in-house and a commercial Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for diagnosis of paratuberculosis. Braz. J. Microbiol, 38: 6-8.
• 10. Norby, B.; Fosgate, G.T.; Roussel, A.J.; Manning, E.J.B.; Collins, M.T. (2005). Isolation of atypical mycobacteria from the environment in cattle herds with high and low seroprevalence to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Proceedings of 8^th ICP, p. 565.
• 11. Olsen, I.; Reitan, L.J.; Holstad, G.; Wilker, H.G. (2001). Alkyl Hydroperoxide Reductases C and D are major antigens Constitutively Expresses by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis Infection and Immunity, 68 (2), 801-808 (108).
• 12. Oriani, D.S.; Sagardoy, M.A. (2002). Nontuberculous mycobacteria in soils of La Pampa province (Argentina). Rev. Argent Microbiol, 34 (3): 132-7.
• 13. Osterstock, J.B.; Roussel, A.J.; Fosgate, G.T.; Norby, B.; Manning, E.J.B.; Collins, M.T. (2005). Contribution of atypical mycobacteria to false-positive reactions to serum ELISA test for paratuberculosis. Proceedings of 8^th ICP, p. 566.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  03 Oct 2008
• Date of issue
  Sept 2008

History

• Received
  25 Oct 2007
• Accepted
  13 July 2008