Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Print version ISSN 1517-8382On-line version ISSN 1678-4405
Braz. J. Microbiol. vol.40 no.2 São Paulo Apr./June 2009
Adherence assays and Slime production of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Ensaios de adesão e produção de muco por Vibrio alginolyticus e Vibrio parahaemolyticus
Fethi Ben AbdallahI,II; Kamel ChaiebI; Tarek ZmantarI; Hela KallelII; Amina BakhroufI
ILaboratoire d'Analyse, Traitement et Valorisation des Polluants de l'Environnement et des Produits. Faculté de Pharmacie Rue Avicenne. Monastir 5000, Tunisia
IIUnité de fermentation et de développement de vaccins virologiques. Institut Pasteur de Tunis.13 place Pasteur. 1002. Tunisia
In this study we investigated the phenotypic slime production of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains, food-borne pathogens, using a Congo red agar plate assay. Furthermore, we studied their ability to adhere to abiotic surfaces and Vero cells line. Our results showed that only V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 was a slime-producer developing almost black colonies on Congo red agar plate. Adherence to glace tube showed that all V. alginolyticus strains were more adherent than V. parahaemolyticus. Only V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 was found to be able to form biofilm on polystyrene microplate wells (OD570 = 0.532). Adherence to Vero cells showed that all tested strains were non adherent after 30 min, however after 60 min all the studied strains become adherent. The percentage of adherence ranged from1.23% to 4.66%.
Key-words: Vibrio, slime production, adherence, abiotic surface, Vero cells.
Neste estudo, investigou-se a produção de muco por cepas de Vibrio alginolyticus e Vibrio parahaemolyticus através do teste em placa de ágar com vermelho congo. Estudou-se também a capacidade de adesão à superfícies abióticas e células Vero. Os resultados indicaram que somente V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749produziu muco, formando colônias quase negras nas placas de ágar com vermelho congo. O teste de adesão a tubos de vidro indicou que as cepas de V. alginolyticus foram mais aderentes do que as de V. parahaemolyticus. Somente V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 foi capaz de formar biofilme nos poços das microplacas de poliestireno (OD570=0,532). Testes de adesão a células Vero mostraram que nenhuma das cepas apresentou adesão em 30 min, mas todas aderiram após 60 min. A porcentagem de adesão variou de 1,23% a 4,66%.
Palavras-chave: Vibrio, produção de muco, adesão, superfície abiótica, células Vero.
Bacterial biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms embedded in a self-produced matrix and adhering to inert or living surfaces (7). Biofilms have been observed on a variety of surfaces and were considered to be the prevailing microbial lifestyle in most environments (26). The formation of biofilms on food and food-processing surfaces, and in water distribution systems, constitutes an increased risk for product contamination with spoilage or pathogenic microflora (9). The development of biofilms can be seen as a five-stage process (24): (i) initial reversible adsorption of cells to the solid surface, (ii) production of extracellular polymeric matrix substances resulting in an irreversible attachment, (iii) early development of biofilm architecture, (iv) maturation, and (v) dispersion of single cells from the biofilm.
Biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces is extensively examined and represents very important issues in food sanitation. It has been shown that bacterial cells trapped in the biofilm matrix created by the exopolysaccharide glycocalyx are more resistant to sanitizers and other environmental stresses than free cells (29). Pathogenic bacteria released from the biofilm definitely lead to food hygiene problems (8).
Biofilm formation of marine vibrios has been reported elsewhere for V. alginolyticus (14), V. cholerae (12), V. harveyi (13). Lopez-Cortes et al. (15) reported the adhesion property of pathogenic vibrios to seafood. Comprehensive examination of the adherence of pathogenic vibrios to biotic surfaces could elucidate the pathogenesis of these bacteria in the host.
The aim of this study was to investigate the slime production and the ability of Vibrioalginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains to adhere to polystyrene microplate, glass tube and Vero cells line.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Nine Vibrio strains were used in this study including two V. alginolyticus strains (S3 and S4) isolated respectively from the internal organs of aquacultured diseased gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) according to method previously described by Ben Kahla et al. (2) and three V. alginolyticus strains designed respectively S5, S6, and S7, isolated from Tunisian seawater were also used. All the isolated strains were identified biochemically using Api 20NE system (Bio-Merieux).
In addition, V. parahaemolyticus strain isolated from the Calich estuary (Alghero, Italy), and three reference strains: Vibrio alginolyticus ATCC 33787, V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 and V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17802 were included in this study (Table 1). All these strains were provided gratefully by Professor S. Zanetti (Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sezione di Microbiologia Sperimentale e Clinica, Universita' degli studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy).
Phenotypic characterization of slime-producing bacteria
Qualitative detection of biofilm formation was studied by culturing the strains on Congo red agar (CRA) plates as described previously (10). Vibrio strains were inoculated into the surface of CRA plates, prepared by mixing 0.8 g Congo red with 36 g saccharose (Sigma) in 1 L of brain heart infusion agar, and were incubated for 24 h at 30ºC under aerobic conditions and followed overnight at room temperature (4) Slime producing bacteria appeared as black colonies, whereas non-slime producers remained non pigmented (25).
Biofilm formation assays by Vibrio strains
Biofilm formation in glass test tubes
For the biofilm formation assay, each Vibrio strain, was cultured in SWT medium containing (per liter): 5 g of Bacto-Tryptone (Difco), 3 g of yeast extract (Difco), 3 ml of glycerol, 700 ml of filtered seawater, and 300 ml of distilled water, at 28ºC with shaking and then transferred to glass test tubes. The cells were incubated without shaking for 10h at 28ºC, then stained with 1% crystal violet solution to visualise cells attached to the test tube (28). After incubation for 15min, the tubes were rinsed with sterile distilled water. Biofilms formed at the air liquid interface were stained purple. All the strains were tested in triplicate.
Quantitative adherence assay
Biofilm production by Vibrio strains was determined using a semi-quantitative adherence assay on 96-well tissue culture plates, as described previously (4). Strains were grown in Trypticase Soy broth supplemented with 1% (w/v) NaCl (TSB 1%, Pronadisa, Spain), Following overnight incubation at 30ºC, the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the bacteria was measured. An overnight culture, grown in TSB 1% at 30ºC, was diluted to 1:100 in TSB supplement with 2% (w/v) glucose. A total of 200 µl of cell suspensions was transferred in a U-bottomed 96-well microtiter plate (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). Each strain was tested in triplicate. Wells with sterile TSB alone were served as controls. The plates were incubated aerobically at 30ºC for 24 h. The cultures were removed and the microtiter wells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (7 mM Na2HPO4, 3 mM NaH2PO4 and 130 mM NaCl at pH 7.4) to remove non-adherent cells and dried in an inverted position. Adherent bacteria were fixed with 95% ethanol and stained with 100 µl of 1% crystal violet (Merck, France) for 5 min. The excess stain was rinsed and poured off and the wells were washed three times with 300 µl of sterile distilled water. The water was then cleared and the microplates were air-dried. The optical density of each well was measured at 570 nm (OD570) using an automated Multiskan reader (GIO. DE VITA E C, Rome, Italy). Biofilm formation was interpreted as highly positive (OD570 ³ 1), low-grade positive (0.1 £ OD570 < 1), or negative (OD570 < 0.1).
Vero cells adherence assays
Quantitative adherence assays was performed with kidney epithelial cells of the African Green Monkey (Vero) as described by Chatti et al. (6). Vero cells were seeded at a concentration of 2×105 and grown overnight in minimal essential medium (MEM) with Earle's salts and 10% fetal bovine serum in 96 -well microtiter plates at 37ºC with 5% CO2. Each Vibrio strain was grown overnight in brain heart infusion with 0.5% NaCl at 30ºC with shaking. The bacterial cells were washed three times by centrifugation at 6000×g for 15 min with MEM without serum and resuspended in the same medium. The number of bacteria in the suspension was adjusted to 107 CFU/ml. The monolayers of Vero cells were inoculated with 107 CFU/ml for each tested strain, and incubated at 37ºC in 5% CO2 for 30 min and 60 min. Then, bacterial suspension was removed to exclude the unattached bacteria. The monolayers of Vero cells were washed 3 times with DMEM, and 1ml Triton X-100 in PBS was added for 5 min at room temperature to release the bacteria from the cells. The number of bacteria was estimated by plating serial dilutions. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Each analysis was performed using the S.P.S.S. 13.0 statistics package for Windows. The differences in the degree of biofilm formation (semi-quantitative adherence assay on 96-well tissue culture plates) and adherence potency to Vero cells were examined by the Friedman test, followed by the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. P-values of < 0.05 were considered as significant. Other analysis were realised between the origin of strains, slime production and glass test tube adherence.
Determination of slime production
Phenotypic slime production was assessed by culturing the investigated strains on CRA plates. Among the 9 Vibrio strains tested in this study, only V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 (S2) was a slime-producer developing almost black colonies whereas the remaining 8 strains are considered as non-producers since they showed white colonies on CRA plates (Fig. 1).
Biofilm formation in glass test tubes
The results of adherence assay to test glace tube showed that V. alginolyticus strains were more adherent than V. parahaemolyticus which is slightly adherent (Fig. 2). Among the seven V. alginolyticus strains, we have observed the existence of three different phenotypes (Fig. 2). In addition, the strains S3 and S7 isolated respectively from diseased Dicentrarchus labrax and seawater were very adherent (Fig. 2a). Furthermore, V. alginolyticus ATCC 33787 (S1) was adherent (Fig. 2b). Whereas, the strain S4 isolated from diseased Sparus aurata, the strains S5 and S6 isolated from seawater and V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 were fairly adherent (Fig. 2c).
Quantitative Biofilm formation
All 9 Vibrio strains were screened for their adherence to polystyrene microplate plates. The results showed that only V. alginolyticus ATTC 17749 is able to form biofilm (OD570=0,532) and was considered as low-grade positive, whereas all the other tested strains did not show any biofilm formation (Table 1).
Vero cells adherence
Quantitative adherence of V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus to Vero cells was assessed in two times: after 30 min of contact we have noted that all strains were non adherent, whereas after 60 min of contact we have noted that all strains were adherent but with different percentages. The adherence is ranged from 1.23% to 4.66%. Our results showed that after 1h of contact, the two V. alginolyticus reference strains (S1 and S2) were more adherent than the other tested strains (Table 1).
Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the OD570 and adherence to Vero cells (P < 0.05). However, the statical analysis between the origin of strains and slime production, the origin of strains and test tube adherence showed a not significant difference (P = 0.342 and 0.304 respectively).
The results, developed in this study, showed that Vibrio, food-borne pathogen, is able to produce biofilm on abiotic surface as well as cells. Our results showed that only V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 was categorized as slime-producer on CRA plate, developing almost black colonies. Indeed, slime production play an important role in the pathogenesis of infections caused by different micro-organismes (1), and is considered to be a significant virulence factor for some staphylococci (16) as well as for Aeromonas spp which indicates the high-risk source contamination (23). Slimes are generally polysaccharidic materials, although other polymers may also be present. They are probably involved in the protection of microbial cells. In addition microorganisms which produce these exopolymers, such as Vibrio, are more resistant to desiccation, predation and toxic chemicals (20). However, these molecules are also important in the formation of biofilms on surfaces. Indeed, exopolymers have been considered to be involved in the first steps of biofilm formation (19). Pringent-Combaret et al. (22) found that the E. coli exopolysaccharide colanic acid was involved only in the ability of the cells to produce voluminous biofilm, and not in the adherence of the cells to plastic surfaces, while Gaylarde and Beech (11) demonstrated that lipopolysaccharides of the outer membrane of Pseudomonas spp. and sulphate-reducing bacteria were the important molecules in initial adhesion to a metal surface.
Qualitative adherence of tested Vibrio strains performed on glace test tube showed that V. alginolyticus was very adherent contrary to V. parahaemolyticus. According to Wolfe et al. (28), this difference may be due to the presence and the expression of rpoN gene especially in V. alginolyticus.
Quantitative adherence to polystyrene microplate plates showed that among the 9 tested strains, only V. alginolyticus ATCC 17749 was capable to form biofilm. Indeed, biofilm formation begins with the attachment of bacteria to abiotic surface, by means of pili, flagella or other materials, followed by the production of exopolysaccharides to form a glycocalyx (29). The attachment of bacteria, such as Vibrio, to glace, polystyrene or other surfaces is affected by various physicochemical and biological factors including bacterial surface hydrophobicity (27), surface appendages, extracellular polymeric substances (5), bacterial physiological state, electrolyte concentration in the medium (17) surface charge and swimming speed. Kogure et al. (14) reported that the attachment of V. alginolyticus to glass surfaces is dependent on swimming speed.
Adherence of pathogenic bacteria, such as Vibrio, to host cells or tissues is a key step in virulence (31). In the present study, culture cells adherence assay performed with kidney epithelial cells of the African Green Monkey, showed the ability of two Vibrio species to adhere, first step, to invasion. Our results may explain the existence of some Vibrio species especially V. alginolyticus, in the internal organs of moribund cultured Sparus aurata and Dicentrarchus labrax (2). According to Wong et al. (29) the two V. alginolyticus reference strains S1 and S2 are considered more pathogens than other tested strains since have the highest adherence percentage: 4.66% for S1 and 4.33% for S2. Attachment to culture cells has been studied in some Vibrio species especially with Human epithelial cells (21), Human intestinal cells (30), and HeLa cells (18). Indeed, the adherence of pathogens to host surfaces is a prerequisite step in the pathogenesis of almost all infectious diseases. Bacterial adherence requires the specific interaction of bacterial molecules, termed adhesins with host cell membrane molecules or extracellular matrix proteins (3).
In conclusion, V. alginolyticus and V. parahaemolyticus, ubiquitous germs are able to adhere to abiotic and biotic surfaces. However, these two pathogens did not show a good ability to form biofilm in the polystyrene microplate contrary to glace tube and culture cells.
We are grateful to Pr. Mahjoub Ouni (Laboratoire des Maladies Transmissibles et Substances Biologiquement Actives, Faculté de Pharmacie de Monastir- Tunisia) for his support in cell culture experiments.
1. Alcaráz, L.E.; Satorres, S.E.; Lucero, R.M.; Puig de centorli O.N. (2003). Species identification, slime production and oxacillin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from nosocomial specimens. Braz. J. Microbiol. 34 (1), 45-51. [ Links ]
2. Ben Kahla, N.A.; Chaieb, K. ; Besbes, A. ; Zmantar, T. ; Bakhrouf, A. (2006). Virulence and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR of Vibrio alginolyticus strains isolated from Tunisian cultured gilthead sea bream and sea bass outbreaks. Vet. Microbiol. 117 (2-4), 321-327. [ Links ]
3. Brown, N.F.; Boddey, J.A.; Flegg, C.P.; Beacham, I.R. (2002). Adherence of Burkholderia pseudomallei Cells to cultured human epithelial cell lines is regulated by growth temperature. Infect. Immun. 70 (2), 974-980. [ Links ]
4. Chaieb, K.; Chehab, O.; Zmantar, T.; Rouabhia, M.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A. (2007). In vitro effect of pH and ethanol on biofilm formation by clinical ica-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Ann. Microbiol. 57 (3), 431-437. [ Links ]
5. Characklis, W.G. (1990). Biofilm processes. In W. G. Characklis and K. C. Marshall (ed.), Biofilms. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. p. 195-231. [ Links ]
6. Chatti, A.; Daghfous, D.; Landoulsi, A. (2007). Effect of seqA mutation on Salmonella Typhimurium virulence. J. Infection. 54 (6), 241-245. [ Links ]
7. Costerton, J.W.; Stewart, P.S.; Greenberg, E.P. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284 (5418), 1318-1322. [ Links ]
8. Dewanti, R.; Wong, A.C.L. (1995). Infuence of culture conditions on biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 26 (2), 147-164. [ Links ]
9. Donlan, R.M. (2002). Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8 (9), 881-890. [ Links ]
10. Freeman, D.J.; Falkiner, F.R.; Keane, C.T. (1989). New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Pathol. 42 (8), 872-874. [ Links ]
11. Gaylarde, C.C.; Beech, I.B. (1989). Adhesion of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans and Pseudomonas fluorescens to mild steel surfaces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 67 (2), 201-207. [ Links ]
12. Hood, M.A.; Winter, P.A. (1997). Attachment of Vibrio cholerae under various environmental conditions and to selected substrates. FEMS. Microbiol. Ecol. 22 (3) 215-223. [ Links ]
13. Karunasagar, I.; Otta, S.K. (1996). Biofilm formation by Vibrio harveyi on surfaces. Aquaculture. 140 (3), 241-245. [ Links ]
14. Kogure, K.; Ikemoto, E.; Morisaki, H. (1998). Attachment of Vibrio alginolyticus to glass surfaces is dependent on swimming speed. J. Bacteriol. 180 (2), 932-937. [ Links ]
15. Lopez-Cortes, L.; Luque, A.; Martinez-Manzanares, E.; Castro, D.; Borrego, J.J. (1999). Adhesion of Vibrio tapetis to clam cells. J. Shellfish. Res. 18 (1), 91-97. [ Links ]
16. Mack, D.; Rohde, H.; Dobinsky, S.; Riedewald, J.; Nedelmann, M.; Knobloch, J.K.; Elsner, H.A.; Feucht, H.H. (2000). Identification of three essential regulatory gene loci governing expression of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 68 (7), 3799-807. [ Links ]
17. Marshall, K.C.; Stout, R.; Mitchell, R. (1971). Mechanism of the initial events in the sorption of marine bacteria to surfaces. J. Gen. Microbiol. 68, 337-348. [ Links ]
18. Miliotis, M.D.; Tall, B.D.; Gray, R.T. (1995). Adherence to and invasion of tissue culture cells by Vibrio hollisae. Infect. Immun. 63 (12), 4959-4963. [ Links ]
19. Muller, E.; Hübner, J.; Gutierrez, N.; Takeda, S.; Goldmann, D. A.; Pier, G. B. (1993). Isolation and characterisation of transposon mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis deficient in capsular polysaccharide/ adhesion and slime. Infect. Immun. 61 (2), 551-558. [ Links ]
20. Ophir, T.; Gutnick, D.L. (1994). A role for exopolysaccharides in the protection of microorganisms from desiccation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60 (2), 740-745. [ Links ]
21. Paranjpye, R.N.; Strom, M.S. (2005). A Vibrio vulnificus type IV pilin contributes to biofilm formation, adherence to epithelial cells, and virulence. Infect. Immun. 73 (3), 1411-1422. [ Links ]
22. Pringent-Combaret, C.; Prensier, G.; Le Thi, T.T.; Vidal, O.; Lejeune, P.; Dorel, C. (2000). Development pathway for biofilm formation in curli-producing Escherichia coli strains: role of flagella, curli and colanic acid. Environ. Microbiol. 2 (6), 450-464. [ Links ]
23. Sechi, L.A.; Deriu, A.; Falchi, M.P.; Fadda, G.; Zanetti, S. (2002). Distribution of virulence genes in Aeromonas spp. Isolated from Sardinian waters and from patients with diarrhoea. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92 (2), 221-227. [ Links ]
24. Stoodley, P.; Sauer, K.; Davies, D.G.; Costerton, J.W. (2002). Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 187-209. [ Links ]
25. Subashkumar, R.; Thayumanavan, T.; Vivekanandhan, G.; Perumalsamy, L. (2006). Occurrence of Aeromonas hydrophila in acute gasteroenteritis among children. Indian. J. Med. Res. 123 (1), 61-66. [ Links ]
26. Van Houdt, R.; Aertsen, A.; Jansen, A.; Quintana, A.L.; Michiels, C.W. (2004). Biofilm formation and cell-to-cell signalling in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from a food processing environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 96 (1), 177-184. [ Links ]
27. Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Lyklema, V.J.; Norde, W.; Schraa, G.; Zehnder, A.J.B. (1987). The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53 (8), 1893-1897. [ Links ]
28. Wolfe, A.J.; Millikan, D.S.; Campbell, J.M.; Visick, K.L. (2004). Vibrio fischeri ó 54 controls motility, biofilm formation, luminescence, and colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 (4), 2520-252. [ Links ]
29. Wong, H.C.; Chung, Y.C.; Yu, J.A. (2002). Attachment and inactivation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus on stainless steel and glass surface. Food. Microbiol. 19 (4), 341-350. [ Links ]
30. Yamamoto, T.; Yokota, T. (1989). Adherence targets of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in human small intestines. Infect. Immun. 57 (8), 2410-2419. [ Links ]
31. Yurdusev, N. (2001). In vitro model for the study of Listeria and Salmonella adherence to intestinal epithelial cells. Turk. J. Biol. 25, 25-35. [ Links ]
Fethi Ben Abdallah
Laboratoire d'Analyse, Traitement et Valorisation des Polluants de l'Environnement et des Produits
Faculté de Pharmacie Rue Avicenne. Monastir 5000, Tunisie
Tel.: + 21 6 73 466 244; Fax: + 216 73 461 830
Submitted: June 04, 2008; Returned to authors for corrections: August 16, 2008; Approved: March 31, 2009