SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue3Expression of fljB: z66 on a linear plasmid of Salmonella enterica serovar typhi is dependent on FliA and FlhDC and regulated by OmpRHuman papillomavirus infection in women from Tlaxcala, Mexico author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Microbiology

Print version ISSN 1517-8382

Braz. J. Microbiol. vol.41 no.3 São Paulo Oct. 2010

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000300026 

GENETICS AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY

 

AFLP analysis of Xanthomonas axonopodis and X. arboricola strains used in xanthan production studies reveal high levels of polymorphism

 

 

Laurí MayerI,*; Wladimir Padilha da SilvaI; Andrea Bittencourt MouraII; Claire Tondo VendruscoloIII

IDepartamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Agroindustrial, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil
IIDepartamento de Fitossanidade, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil
IIICentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used to analyze the genetic diversity of 14 strains of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni and seven strains of X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli, which are used in xanthan production studies. Relationships identified by the AFLP profiles were assessed for xanthan production capacity, geographical location and host plant. Strains were isolated from 10 different geographic regions in South and Southeast States in Brazil. Data were analyzed for genetic similarity using the Dice coefficient and subjected to UPGMA cluster analysis. A total of 128 AFLP fragments were generated from four primer combinations: EcoRI+C/MseI+0, EcoRI+A/MseI+0, EcoRI+G/MseI+T and EcoRI+G/MseI+A. Of these, 96.1% were polymorphic. X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli (SD = 0.27) was shown to be more polymorphic than X. arboricola pv. pruni (SD = 0.58). All 14 pathovar pruni strains were included in a single main group (SD = 0.58), while the pathovar phaseoli strains were divided into three separate groups, with one group containing five strains (SD = 0.38) and two isolated groups (SD = 0.31 and 0.27) composed of only one strain each. Species were distinguished by three and eight specific AFLP markers present in the pathovar phaseoli and the pathovar pruni, respectively. For the unique strain without xanthan production capacity (X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli str. 48), nine specific AFLP bands were found. There was no evidence that geographic area or host plant influenced genetic heterogeneity. Correlations between AFLP patterns and xanthan production capacity were found in some strains, but were not consistent enough to establish a relationship.

Key words: DNA fingerprints; genomic diversity; pathovar phaseoli; pathovar pruni.


 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The genus Xanthomonas is composed of phytopathogenic bacterial species that cause diseases in different crop plants, resulting in significant crop losses worldwide. Each species infects specific hosts (18). In addition to causing diseases in crops, most of the species produce xanthan gum via an aerobic fermentation process. Xanthan gum is an important biopolymer and is used in the food, oil and cosmetics industries. For industrial production of xanthan gum, X. campestris pv. campestris strain NRRL B-1459 is normally used. However, other Xanthomonas species have been shown to be capable of xanthan production, including strains with considerable xanthan yields such as the X. arboricola pv. pruni strains isolated from Brazil (2, 4, 20).

X. arboricola pv. pruni (19) is the causal agent of Prunus Bacterial Spot disease (PBS), which infects cultivated Prunus species and their hybrids. In southern Brazil, hundreds of strains have been isolated from peach and plum trees at the Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Clima Temperado. From this collection, diverse studies have been conducted, mainly investigating xanthan yields obtained by fermentation processes, including their rheological properties and chemical compositions (2, 3, 13, 17, 20). X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli (14, 19) infects mainly Phaseolus vulgaris and causes Common Bacterial Blight, but other legume species are also naturally infected. Xanthan production studies have also been reported for this strain (11, 12).

Many studies have used molecular biology techniques with diverse Xanthomonas species to show high levels of genetic diversity (polymorphism) in the genus as well as within species (1, 8, 9, 21, 22, 25). On the other hand, pathovars from different species have shown strong genetic similarities, resulting in a total reclassification of the Xanthomonas genus (19). Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) has been used successfully to study genetic diversity in Xanthomonas (22), allowing for the identification of pathovars and allowing strains with a high degree of genetic similarity to be distinguished (23).

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the genomic variability of the X. arboricola pv. pruni and X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli strains used in xanthan production studies. For the AFLP analyses, strains with different xanthan production capacities in MPII medium were chosen.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

A total of 21 Xanthomonas strains were used in this study, including 7 X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli and 14 X. arboricola pv. pruni strains (Table 1), isolated from 10 different geographic regions in South and Southeast States in Brazil (Fig. 1).

 

 

 

 

Genomic DNA extraction

The strains were incubated in 20-ml tubes containing 5 ml YM medium (0.3% malt extract, 0.3% yeast extract, 1% glucose, 0.5% peptone) for 24 h at 300 rpm and 28ºC. Aliquots of 2 ml of culture (O.D.580 = 1) were collected for extraction. The cells were washed twice with water and subsequently centrifuged to remove the xanthan gum. The cells were lysed using 500 µl of 5% SDS solution at 60ºC for 40 min. Genomic DNA was purified using phenol/chloroform extraction, precipitated with ice-cold ethanol and resuspended in 30 µl TE buffer. The concentration was determined with a spectrophotometer measuring A260 (1 absorbance unit = 50 µg ml-1). DNA quality was checked by measuring A280 and DNA integrity was confirmed on a 1% agarose gel. The DNA samples were adjusted to 100 ng µl-1 and stored at -20ºC.

AFLP protocols

The procedures were performed as described by the commercial AFLP kit for microorganisms from InvitrogenTM Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA , USA), with minor modifications. The protocol involved the following steps: 1) digestion of total genomic DNA with two restriction endonucleases and ligation of oligonucleotide adapters; 2) preselective amplification and selective amplification of a set of restriction fragments by PCR; and 3) separation of amplified DNA fragments with denaturing polyacrylamide gels.

DNA digestion and adapter ligation

DNA digestion was performed for 4 h at 37ºC. Reactions were carried out in 10 µl volumes containing 200 ng of sample DNA, 0.65 U each of EcoRI and MseI enzymes and 2.5 µl of 5X reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM Mg-acetate, 250 mM K-acetate). Digestion was confirmed on a 1% agarose gel. Endonucleases were denaturated at 70ºC for 15 min. DNA ligation was performed by adding 9.6 µl of adapter solution (EcoRI/MseI adapters, 0.4 mM ATP, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM Mg-acetate, 50 mM K-acetate) and 0.4 U of T4 DNA ligase. Reactions were subsequently incubated at 20ºC for 5 h.

DNA amplification

Preselective amplification assays were carried out in 12 µl volumes containing 7.6 µl of ligation mixture as template (not diluted), 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 16 ng of EcoRI+0 primer, 16 ng of MseI+0 primer containing dNTPs and 1.2 µl of 10X buffer PCR plus Mg [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 15 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl). The thermal profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94ºC (2 min), followed by 20 cycles at 94ºC (30 s), 56ºC (1 min) and 72ºC (1 min), with a final extension for 5 min at 72ºC.

Selective amplifications contained 2.5 µl of DNA (preamplified and diluted 20-fold diluted), 7 ng of EcoRI primers, 15 ng of MseI primers containing dNTPs and 1 µl of 10X buffer PCR plus Mg [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 15 mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl). The thermal profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94ºC (3 min), followed by 30 cycles at 94ºC (1 min), 65ºC (decreasing 1ºC per cycle during the first 10 cycles) (1 min) and 72ºC (1.5 min), with a final extension for 5 min at 72ºC. Seven primer combinations were tested: EcoRI+C/MseI+0, EcoRI+A/MseI+0, EcoRI+T/MseI+0, EcoRI+G/MseI+T, EcoRI+A/MseI+C, EcoRI+G/MseI+A and EcoRI+AC/MseI+G. PCR reactions were performed in a Peltier PTC-100 thermocycler.

Electrophoresis of PCR products

The final amplified products were denatured at 94ºC and immediately placed on ice. Samples (6 µl) were loaded and separated on a 6% polyacrylamide denaturing gel at a constant power of 60 W for 2 h at 50ºC in 1X TBE buffer. Finally, the gels were silver stained according to Creste et al. (6).

Data analysis

AFLP markers (100 to 450 bp) obtained were manually scored for either present [1] or absent [0] bands in individual lanes. Only strong bands were scored; faint bands were discarded. The binary matrix was used for calculation of genetic diversity among isolates on Dice's coefficient. Cluster analysis and dendrogram construction were done using the unweighted pair group method with an arithmetic mean (UPGMA) in the NTSYS-PC 2.1 software (Applied Biostatistics Inc). The bootstrap values were generated using Winboot software (24).

 

RESULTS

Selection of AFLP primers

Primer combination assays were performed to determine which AFLP primers had the optimal number of selective nucleotides to generate an average of 30 bands per sample. After screening seven primer combinations, four were chosen for use in this study (Table 2). The primer combinations EcoRI+T/MseI+0 and EcoRI+A/MseI+C did not generate clear AFLP patterns and the number of bands of the primer combination EcoRI+AC/MseI+G was very low. The reproducibility of the AFLP profiles was determined using two isolates of X. arboricola pv. pruni and two isolates of X. axonopodis pv. Phaseoli, which were each processed three times. No differences were observed between experimental replicates.

 

 

Polymorphism level and cluster analysis

The sizes of bands scored in all gels were in the range of 100-450 bp. In total, 128 amplification products were produced, of which 123 were polymorphic (Table 2). Consequently, only five bands were shared among all strains, showing a high polymorphism level (91.9% to 100%), depending on the primer combination used. Within species, the polymorphic level was 94.7 and 87.2% in pathovar phaseoli and pruni, respectively.

The 123 AFLP polymorphic fragments were used to construct the dendrogram and to estimate the genetic diversity among the Xanthomonas strains. The cophenetic correlation coefficient (r), calculated between the binary matrix data and the dendrogram generated, was 0.97. Based on a cut-off point of 0.33 (calculated by NTSYS-PC 2.1 software) in Dice's similarity coefficient scale, the 21 strains were divided into four groups (Fig. 2). All 14 strains of X. arboricola pv. pruni were grouped into a single main cluster (SD = 0.58), named Group IV. Additionally, in this group, two subgroups were identified, named A (SD = 0.78) and B (SD = 0.82). X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli strains were more polymorphic, with strains 2, 12, 16, 29 and 32 in Group I (SD = 0.38) and the other two strains (48 and 14) inserted in the isolated Group II (SD = 0.27) and Group III (SD = 0.31), respectively. The presence of three exclusive AFLP bands in all X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli strains and eight in all X. arboricola pv. pruni strains have distinguished these pathovars.

 

 

Genetic heterogeneity was not influenced by the geographical location of the strains. Different patterns were found within one site, and similar molecular patterns were found in strains collected at different sites. In pathovar pruni, subgroups A and B contain strains isolated from different sites and the two most genetically-related strains (X. arboricola pv. pruni str. 61 and 109; SD = 0.91) were isolated 400 km away from each other. Additionally, this pathovar no showed differences in AFLP profiles based on the host isolation (Prunus persica and P. pruni). In the pathovar phaseoli, three strains were isolated from the same place, but only two (X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli str. 12 and 16) showed the highest genetic similarity (SD = 0.77) in comparison with the other strains of the pathovar.

Robust relationships between genetic similarity and xanthan production capacity with these strains were not found. However, similar xanthan yields were observed for X. arboricola pv. pruni str. 61 and 109 (SD = 0.91; xanthan production: 4.1 and 4.8 g L-1, respectively) and for X. arboricola pv. pruni str. 30 and 106 (SD = 0.87; xanthan production: 6.6 and 6.8 g L-1, respectively). The two most polymorphic strains had the lowest xanthan production capacity (X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli str. 14) or no production capacity (X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli str. 48). Moreover, for the unique strain with no xanthan production capacity, nine specific AFLP markers were identified.

 

DISCUSSION

Typically, 30 to 80 restriction fragments are amplified in each AFLP reaction and detected by denaturing gel electrophoresis. This number is mainly influenced by three factors: number of selective nucleotides used in each primer combination, recognition sites of the restriction enzymes and C+G content of the genome analyzed (21). The relatively low number of bands obtained with each primer combination (approximately 32) was partly due to the fact that the restriction enzymes EcoRI (GAATTC) and MseI (TTAA) recognize T+A-rich sequences, but Xanthomonas genomes have low T+A contents, with about 29-37% T+A. On the other hand, complex fingerprints (with a large number of bands) can be difficult to analyze manually. Thus, the quantity of AFLP fragments obtained in each primer combination was considered to be satisfactory.

The cophenetic correlation coefficient value found indicates high co-linearity between the matrix data and the dedrogram generated. Based on this value, the UPGMA method was used to cluster the genotypes. High bootstrap values showed that this clustering was well supported and that the dendrogram generated was robust.

If the search for a pattern between genetic similarity and geographical isolation includes both pathovars, partial relationships can be observed. However, more detailed observations show that differences in the AFLP profiles are caused by the pathovar genetic profile, not by the geographic area of each strain. These results are in accordance with Zaccardelli et al. (25), who analyzed 109 X. arboricola pv. pruni strains from different geographical locations and also concluded that the AFLP technique did not have sufficient resolution to distinguish this pathovar on the basis of geographic area or host plant. Additionally, in a study using AFLP with 66 isolates of X. arboricola pv. juglandis from different countries, Loreti et al. (9) concluded that geographic location could be only partly responsible for genomic heterogeneity.

The high degree of genetic diversity found in the pathovar phaseoli in this study is consistent with the results of Alavi et al. (1), who first reported a large degree of genetic diversity in this pathovar using AFLP assays from a worldwide collection. These authors identified three distinct genetic lineages, but the lineages were not geographically linked. The absence of a pattern between genetic similarity and geographic location with the pathovar phaseoli was also found by Manceau et al. (10), who studied polymorphisms in the ISXax1 insertion sequence. The dissemination of X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli through contaminated seeds is the probable reason for the lack of a geographically structured genetic profile (10).

Environmental microorganism dissemination is normally influenced by wind and rain events over time. Thus, the presence of a high level of genetic heterogeneity among pathovar pruni strains isolated from the three places (H, I and J) that have relatively small distances between them (< 100 km) is strong evidence that the pathovar pruni population from this geographical region is composed of different genetic groups. This evidence is strengthened by the hundreds of strain isolates from this region (20), indicating a very rich Xanthomonas microbiota. Nevertheless, to strengthen this evidence, a genetic diversity study that includes a larger number of strains will be necessary. In the pathovar phaseoli, it is possible that geographic area is partly responsible for the high levels of polymorphism found. However, to prove this, it will be necessary to study more than one strain from each location.

Genetic polymorphism is also influenced by IS elements, which play an important role in bacterial evolution. These mobile genetic elements are an important source of genomic variability in prokaryotes, mainly by promoting chromosomal rearrangements and genetic exchanges between bacterial populations (10, 16). Pathovar pruni were shown to be missing a considerable number of IS elements in the pathovar pruni genome compared to the reference strains X. campestris pv. campestris B100 and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria 85-10 (determined by microarray comparative genomic hybridization (unpublished data)). Interestingly, Manceau et al. (10) identified a new insertion sequence (ISXax1) in pathovar phaseoli and suggested that it may contribute to genetic diversity.

The absence of clear relationships between genetic similarity, xanthan production capacity and plant host isolation can be explained by the small DNA regions that are responsible for these features. Host specificity to phytopathogenic bacteria is usually established by specific molecular receptors present on both surfaces. In these microorganisms, the molecular receptors are encoded by a small number of genes, representing a small part of the genome. The same is true of the xanthan biosynthetic process, which is encoded by a 16-kb operon of 12 genes (gumB to gumM), as well as some other related genes, representing less than 1% of the Xanthomonas genome (about 5 Mb). Thus, the polymorphisms present in a single gene or operon represents only a small part of the polymorphisms in the entire genome, and establishing relationships based on these specific features can be very difficult with techniques such as AFLP assays, which explore genetic polymorphisms at the genome level.

In this study, AFLP analysis proved to be reproducible and sufficiently sensitive to determine genetic diversity in the pathovars of the strains studied. Moreover, the influence of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in the AFLP analysis makes this technique a powerful tool to estimate genetic diversity among very similar genomes, something that is difficult to determine with other techniques, such as RAPD (Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA).

In conclusion, we report a high level of polymorphism among the 21 Xanthomonas tested. The X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli genome was shown to be more polymorphic in comparison with X. arboricola pv. pruni and the strains were differentiated by specific AFLP markers present in each pathovar. AFLP-based genetic profiles and xanthan production capacity relationships were not consistent enough to establish a pattern and we did not find evidence that geographic area or host plant influences genetic heterogeneity.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors of this paper are grateful to DCTA-UFPel (Department of Food Science – Federal University of Pelotas) and CAPES (Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education) for financial support.

 

REFERENCES

1. Alavi, S.M.; Sanjari, S.; Durand, F.; Brin, C.; Manceau, C.; Poussier, S. (2008). Assessment of the genetic diversity of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans as a basis to identify putative pathogenicity genes and a type III secretion system of the SPI-1 family by multiple suppression subtractive hybridizations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3295-3301.         [ Links ]

2. Borges, C.D.; Vendruscolo, C.T. (2007). Xanthan synthesized by strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni: production, viscosity and chemical composition. Biosci. J. 23, 67-73.         [ Links ]

3. Borges, C.D. (2004) Caracterização da goma xantana em função da cepa de Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni e das condições operacionais. Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 49p. (M.Sc. Dissertation, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Agroindustrial. UFPel).         [ Links ]

4. Borges, C.D.; Paula, R.C.M.; Feitosa, J.P.A.; Vendruscolo, C.T. (2009). The influence of thermal treatment and operational conditions on xanthan produced by X. arboricola pv. pruni strain 106. Carbohydrate Polymers, 75, 262-268.         [ Links ]

5. Cadmus, M.C.; Knutson, C.A.; Lagoda, A.A.; Pittsley, J.E.; Burton, K.A. (1978). Synthetic media for production of quality xanthan gum in 20 liter fermentors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20, 1003-1014.         [ Links ]

6. Creste, S.; Neto, A.T.; Figueira, A. (2001). Detection of single sequence repeat polymorphisms in  denaturing polyacrylamide sequencing gels by silver staining. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 19, 299–306.         [ Links ]

7. Khodakaramian, G.; Swings, J. (2002). AFLP fingerprinting of the strains of Xanthomonas axonopodis inducing citrus canker disease in southern Iran. J. Phytopathol. 150, 227-231.         [ Links ]

8. Kölliker, R.; Kraehenbuehl, R.; Boller, B.; Widmer, F. (2006). Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of the grass pathogen Xanthomonas translucens pv. graminis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 29, 109-119.         [ Links ]

9. Loreti, S.; Gallelli, A.; Belisario, A.; Wajnberg, E.; Corazza, L. (2001). Investigation of genomic variability of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis by AFLP analysis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 107, 583-591.         [ Links ]

10. Manceau, C.; Alavi, S.M.; Poussier, S. (2007). Characterization of ISXax1, a Novel Insertion Sequence Restricted to Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli (Variants fuscans and non-fuscans) and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1678-1682.         [ Links ]

11. Mayer, L. (2006) Caracterização molecular de cepas de Xanthomonas campestris e Xanthomonas axonopodis pela técnica de AFLP e relação com a produção, reologia e composição química da xantana. Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 68p. (M.Sc. Dissertation, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Agroindustrial. UFPel).         [ Links ]

12. Mayer, L.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Silva, W.P.; Moura, A.B. (2008). Produção, propriedades reológicas e composição química da xantana produzida por Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli. R. Bras. Tecnol. Agroind. 02, 87-95.         [ Links ]

13. Moreira, A.S.; Diaz, P.S.; Vendruscolo, C.T. (2004). Production of xanthan by Xanthomonas campestris pv pruni strain 24 in fermentor: effect of aeration and fermentation time. R. Bras. Agrocien. 10, 31-36.         [ Links ]

14. Moura, A.B.; Zanatta, Z.G.C.N.; Maia, L.C.; Santos, A.S. (2007). Bioassay for selection of biocontroller bacteria against bean common blight (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli). Braz. J. Microbiol. 38, 511-515.         [ Links ]

15. Schaad, N.W.; Postnikova, E.; Lacy, G.H.; Sechler, A.; Agarkova, I.; Stromberg, P.E.; Stromberg, V.K.; Vidaver, A.K. (2005). Reclassification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. citri (ex Hasse 1915) Dye 1978 forms A, B/C/D, and E as X. smithii subsp. citri (ex Hasse) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., X. fuscans subsp. aurantifolii (ex Gabriel 1989) sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov., and X. alfalfae subsp. citrumelo (ex Riker and Jones) Gabriel et al., 1989 sp. nov. nom. rev. comb. nov.; X. campestris pv. malvacearum (ex Smith 1901) Dye 1978 as X. smithii subsp. smithii nov. comb. nov. nom. nov.; X. campestris pv. alfalfae (ex Riker and Jones, 1935) Dye 1978 as X. alfalfae subsp. alfalfae (ex Riker et al., 1935) sp. nov. nom. rev.; and "var. fuscans" of X. campestris pv. phaseoli (ex Smith, 1987) Dye 1978 as X. fuscans subsp. fuscans sp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 28, 494-518.         [ Links ]

16. Siguier, P.; Filée, J.; Chandler, M. (2006). Insertion sequences in prokaryotic genomes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 9, 526-531.         [ Links ]

17. Souza, A.S.; Vendruscolo, C.T. (1999). Produção e caracterização dos biopolímeros sintetizados por Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni cepas 24 e 58. Cienc. Engenh. 8, 115-123.         [ Links ]

18. Vauterin, L.; Swings, J. (1997). Are classification and phytopathological diversity compatible in Xanthomonas? J. Ind. Microbiol. Biot. 19, 77-82.         [ Links ]

19. Vauterin, L.; Hoste B.; Kersters, K.; Swings, J., (1995). Reclassification of Xanthomonas. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45, 472-489.         [ Links ]

20. Vendruscolo, C.T.; Moreira, A.S.; Vendruscolo, J.L.S.; Gil-Turnes, C. (2001). Screening among 18 novel strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pruni. Food Hydrocolloid. 15, 469-474.         [ Links ]

21. Verdier, V.; Gonzalez, C.; Restrepo, S.; Tohme, J. (2002) Characterization of pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis by PCR-based DNA fingerprinting techniques. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 215, 23-31.         [ Links ]

22. Verdier, V.; Restrepo, S.; Duque, M.; Tohme, J. (1999) AFLP fingerprinting: an efficient technique for detecting genetic variation of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis. Microbiology, 145, 107-114.         [ Links ]

23. Voz, P.; Hogers, R.; Bleeker M.; Reijans, M.; Van de Lee, T.; Hornes, M.; Frijters, A.; Pot, J.; Peleman, J.; Kuiper, M.; Zabeau, M. (1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4407-4414.         [ Links ]

24. Yap, I.V.; Nelson, R.J. (1996). Winboot: A program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. International Rice Research Instititute (IRRI). Manila, Philippines, 22p.         [ Links ]

25. Zaccardelli M.; Ceroni, P.; Mazzucchi U. (1999). Amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni. J. Plant Pathol. 81, 173-179.         [ Links ]

 

 

Submitted: August 28, 2009; Returned to authors for corrections: October 17, 2009; Approved: March 29, 2010.

 

 

* Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Agroindustrial – FAEM Universidade Federal de Pelotas CEP 96010-900, caixa postal 354 Pelotas/RS, Brazil.; Fax.: +55 (53) 3275-7258.; E-mail: laurimayer@gmail.com

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License