Evaluation of biofilm production by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis patients

Perez, L.R.R.; Costa, M.C.N.; Freitas, A.L.P.; Barth, A.L.

doi:10.1590/S1517-83822011000200011

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients typically suffer of persistent and recurrent lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa that many times possess ability for the biofilm production. Here, biofilm production among P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from sputum of CF and non-CF patients was evaluated. Most isolates were biofilm-producing independently of the patient's condition.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; biofilm; cystic fibrosis

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY

Evaluation of biofilm production by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis patients

Perez, L.R.R.I, ^* * Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Departamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Av. Ipiranga, 2752 CEP: 90610-000 Porto Alegre - RS.; E-mail: leandro.reus@gmail.com ; Costa, M.C.N.^II; Freitas, A.L.P.^II; Barth A.L.^{II, III}

^IPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

^IIDepartamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

^IIIServiço de Patologia Clínica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil

ABSTRACT

Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients typically suffer of persistent and recurrent lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa that many times possess ability for the biofilm production. Here, biofilm production among P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from sputum of CF and non-CF patients was evaluated. Most isolates were biofilm-producing independently of the patient's condition.

Key words:Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biofilm, cystic fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic and chronic disease that affects the lower respiratory tract. This disease is characterized by excessive mucus production that covers the epithelium (2).

Patients with CF present recurrent and persistent lung infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In most of cases, the antimicrobial therapy is unable to eradicate the pseudomads infection. Despite also unclear, there is evidence that the biofilm formation is responsible, in part, for therapeutic failure (6, 7).

Additionally, the biofilm mode of growth makes the bacteria more resistant to antimicrobial agents due to: 1) low penetration of the antimicrobial inside matrix; 2) alteration in the rate of bacterial growth; and 3) horizontal transference of elements genetically mobiles that possess genes of antimicrobial resistance (5, 8). Beside this, quorum sensing (QS) seems to be related to biofilm formation under certain growth conditions as such as medium of culture, temperature and atmosphere of incubation (4, 7).

In the study presented here we evaluated the ability of biofilm formation among P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic (CF+) and non-cystic fibrosis (CF-) patients.

A total of 74 P. aeruginosa isolates recovered from sputum of patients hospitalized at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) were analyzed. All the isolates were identified by the use of WalkAway^® 96SI system (Siemens), oxidase test and production of pigments. Of these, 35 and 39 isolates were recovered from CF+ and CF- patients, respectively. The age of the CF+ ranging from four to fifty-two years old. Among P. aeruginosa isolates from CF+, 30 isolates (85.7%) presented colony with mucoid aspect. Only five isolates recovered from younger patients did not present this mucoid phenotype. Patients without cystic fibrosis diagnosis did not present any chronical diseases but two patients that were admitted to intensive care unit were submitted to mechanical ventilation.

Quantitative determination of biofilm was made using a microtitre plate assay in accordance with Stepanovic et al (10), with some modifications. Briefly, three to five colonies were suspended in 5 ml of Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) and incubated during 18h at 35±1°C, without shaking. After incubation, the stationary-phase culture was vortexed and thereafter diluted 1:100 in TSB with 0.25% glucose, and 200 µl of this solution was incubated in 96-well plates during 18h at 35±1°C. Media with suspended bacteria was then removed; the plates were carefully washed four times with water and air-dried before staining with 200 µl of 0.9% crystal violet solution (Sigma, Stockholm, Sweden) for 15 min. After removing the dye solution and washing with water, the attached dye was solubilized with 95% ethanol and the optical density of the adherent biofilm was determined twice with a filter of 450/630nm in a microtitre plate reader (OrthoReader II, Ortho diagnostic systems, New Jersey, USA). In the experiments, we used TSB with 0.25% glucose as a negative control (background absorbance). All isolates were tested at least three times in triplicate.

For interpretation of the biofilm results, the isolates were classified as follow: non-producing, weak, moderate and strong-producing, based on the following optic density (OD) average values: OD(isolate) < OD(control) = non-biofilm-producing; OD(control) < OD(isolate) < 2OD(control) = weak-producing; 2OD(control) < OD(isolate) < 4OD(control) = moderate-producing; 4OD(control) < OD(isolate) = strong-producing (10).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (biofilm-producing) and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (non-biofilm-producing) were used as controls.

Biofilm production is often associated with microbial virulence and resistance (4). Although the mechanism is still poorly elucidated, some studies reported a great ability for biofilm production among P. aeruginosa isolates from CF+ mainly by their capacity of adaptation into cystic fibrosis lung (1, 3, 9). Similarly to other studies, we noted that most of the isolates from CF+ were able to produce biofilm "in vitro". On the other hand, a high proportion of biofilm-producing isolates among that recovered from CF- can indicate that this characteristic is an important virulence factor that can be attributed to P. aeruginosa isolates from sputa, independently of the physiologic condition of the patient since we did not observe a statistically significant association between the presence of cystic fibrosis and biofilm production (p=0.6205).

The OD_450/630 values obtained to classify the isolates as non-producing, weak and moderate-biofilm-producing were OD_450/630 < 0,071; 0,071 < OD_450/630 < 0,142 and 0,142 < OD_450/630< 0,284; respectively (Figure 1), considering a standard deviation value of 0.0034. A total of 74 isolates were analyzed and among all of them, the biofilm production was observed in 68% (50/74) of the isolates being the most classified as weak-producing (Table 1). Only two isolates, both from CF+, showed OD_450/630 values of 0.156 (strain 34) and 0.1986 (strain 35) and were classified as moderate-biofilm-producing (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Thumbnail

Among isolates from CF+, 71.4% (25/35) were biofilm-producing while among isolates from CF-, 64.1% (25/39) were biofilm-producing.

An important aspect of this study was that we used the microtiter assay as standard technique for evaluating of biofilm production. It is known that exist many techniques (electronic and confocal microscopy, Calgary device, flow continuous cell and others) that can be used for this aim and, for this reason, the interpretation of the results obtained from different methodologies can suffer some alterations (weak to moderate or moderate to strong, for example) (5, 10).

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that most of P. aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis have capacity to produce biofilm "in vitro". Despite of this, most of them were classified as weak biofilm-producing by the methodology applied (microtiter assay). Although the cystic fibrosis isolates possess ability and flexibility to produce biofilm our results showed a high capacity of biofilm production "in vitro" among non-cystic fibrosis isolates as well. Further investigations including a higher number of isolates can be useful to elucidate the correlation between biofilm production and clinical condition of the patient.

Submitted: May 17, 2010; Returned to authors for corrections: June 28, 2010; Approved: January 13, 2011.

1. Davies, J.C.; Bilton, D. (2009). Bugs, biofilms, and resistance in cystic fibrosis. Respir Care 54, 628-638.
2. Donlan, M.R.; Costerton, J.W. (2002). Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15, 167-193.
3. Gomez, M.I.; Prince, A. (2007). Opportunistic infections in lung disease: Pseudomonas infections in cystic ûbrosis. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 7, 244-251.
4. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Stoodley, P. (2009). Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol. 11, 1034-1043.
5. Kirov, S.M.; Webb, J.S.; O'may, C.Y.; Reid, D.W.; Woo, J.K.K.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S. (2007). Biofilm differentiation and dispersal in mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis. Microbiology 153, 3264-3274.
6. Mikkelsen, H.; Duck, Z.; Lilley, K.S.; Welch, M. (2007). Interrelationships between colonies, biofilms, and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa J. Bacteriol. 189, 2411-2416.
7. Moreau-Marquis, S.; Stanton, B.A.; O'Toole, G.A. (2008). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation in the cystic fibrosis airway. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 21, 595-599.
8. Rodriguez-Martinez, J.M.; Pascual, A. (2008). Activity of antimicrobial agents on bacterial biofilms. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 26, 107-114.
9. Singh, P.K.; Schaefer, A.L.; Parsek, M.R.; Moninger, T.O.; Welsh, M.J.; Greenberg, E.P. (2000). Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic ûbrosis lungs are infected with bacterial bioûlms. Nature. 407, 762-764.
10. Stepanovic, S.; Vukovic, D.; Hola, V.; Di Bonaventura, G.; Djukiv, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Ruzicka, F. (2007). Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 15, 891-899.

*

Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Departamento de Análises, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Av. Ipiranga, 2752 CEP: 90610-000 Porto Alegre - RS.; E-mail:

leandro.reus@gmail.com