Characterization of a chitinase with antifungal activity from a native Serratia marcescens B4A

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY

Characterization of a chitinase with antifungal activity from a native Serratia marcescens B4A

Mandana Zarei^I,II; Saeed Aminzadeh^I,*; Hossein Zolgharnein^II; Alireza Safahieh^II; Morteza Daliri^I; Kambiz Akbari Noghabi^I; Ahmad Ghoroghi^III; Abbasali Motallebi^III

^IDepartment of Animal and Marine Biotechnology, National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), Shahrak-e Pajoohesh Km 15, Tehran-Karaj Highway, Tehran, Iran

^IIFaculty of Marine Sciences, Khorramshahr Marine Sciences and Technology University, Khorramshahr, Iran

^IIIIranian Fisheries Research Organization, No: 297, West Fatemi Ave., Tehran, Iran

ABSTRACT

Chitinases have the ability of chitin digestion that constitutes a main compound of the cell wall in many of the phytopathogens such as fungi. In the following investigation, a novel chitinase with antifungal activity was characterized from a native Serratia marcescens B4A. Partially purified enzyme had an apparent molecular mass of 54 kDa. It indicated an optimum activity in pH 5 at 45ºC. Enzyme was stable in 55ºC for 20 min and at a pH range of 3-9 for 90 min at 25ºC. When the temperature was raised to 60ºC, it might affect the structure of enzymes lead to reduction of chitinase activity. Moreover, the K_m and V_max values for chitin were 8.3 mg/ml and 2.4 mmol/min, respectively. Additionally, the effect of some cations and chemical compounds were found to stimulate the chitinase activity. In addition, Iodoacetamide and Idoacetic acid did not inhibit enzyme activity, indicating that cysteine residues are not part of the catalytic site of chitinase. Finally, chitinase activity was further monitored by scanning electronic microscopy data in which progressive changes in chitin porosity appeared upon treatment with chitinase. This enzyme exhibited antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani, Bipolaris sp, Alternaria raphani, Alternaria brassicicola, revealing a potential application for the industry with potentially exploitable significance. Fungal chitin shows some special features, in particular with respect to chemical structure. Difference in chitinolytic ability must result from the subsite structure in the enzyme binding cleft. This implies that why the enzyme didn't have significant antifungal activity against other Fungi.

Key word: Antifungal; Characterization; Chitinase; Serratia marcescens B4A

INTRODUCTION

Plants, in contrast with vertebrates, have no immune system. So they affect pathogens easily leading to remarkable yield loss altogether (40, 32). One of the most important pathogens in plants is fungi. Chemical fungicides are extensively adopted in current of plant diseases. Therefore, biological control tactics become an important approach to facilitate sustainable agriculture (51). farming practices to protect crops from diseases. However, recently their utilization has attracted increased scrutiny since chemical fungicides are highly toxic. They can cause environmental contamination and/or the presence of fungicide residues in food products induce pathogen resistance (6, 26). Because of these limitations of chemical fungicides, it seems necessary to search for an alternative control strategy. Biological control or the use of microorganisms or their secretions to prevent plant diseases offers an attractive harmless alternative or supplement for the control tactics become an important approach to facilitate sustainable agriculture (51).

Since chitin is the major component of most fungal cell walls, a principal role has been attributed to enzymes from the chitinolytic system (12). Enzymatic lysis of fungal cell walls through extracellular chitinases has been implicated as a mechanism of biocontrol by bacterial agents (24, 63, 64). Extensive studies over the past two decades on chitinases have been done by a large number of laboratories. This is mostly due to the antifungal property of chitinases (27, 11). Microbial production of chitinase has captured worldwide attention of both industrial and scientific environments, not only because of its wide spectrum of applications but also for the lacuna of an effective production method (25).

Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) catalyze the hydrolysis of chitin, a linear homopolymer of β-1,4-linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues. This polysaccharide is present in the cell walls of fungi and green algae and in the exoskeleton of many crustacean and insects (35). The carbohydrate active enzyme (CAZy) database (http://www.cazy.org/) classifies carbohydrate enzymes into functional families, which are further subdivided into structurally related families designated by number. Following this classification, chitinases are listed as GH family-18 and GH family-19. Family 19 is generally highly conserved and contains mainly plant chitinases. Family 18 includes a large number of diversely evolved chitinases from plants, animals, bacteria and fungi (62).

Bacterial chitinases extracted from several Actinobacteria and Streptomyces species (59, 56, 17), and the ones extracted from plants (46, 19, 58) both have potential applications in the biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi and insects (13). In addition to control of phytopathogens fungi, other different applications of chitinase such as target for biopesticides (8, 31), Estimation of fungal biomass (30), Mosquito control (28) and Morphogenesis (38) have been discovered. Biological control of plant pathogens provides an attractive alternative means for management of plant disease without the negative impact of chemical fungicides that are usually costly and can cause environmental pollution, and may induce pathogen resistance (5).

This research aims at characterizing native chitinase Serratia marcescens B4A and investigating its antifungal activity on pathogen fungi that attacks important economical plants as well as the comparison of its characteristics with those of previously described antifungal chitinase in order to ascertain whether it is a novel antifungal compound or not.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals

Chitin powder was obtained from shrimp shells of Penaeus indicus by the modified Method of Takiguchi (42). Shrimps were purchased from the markets in Abadan (Iran) and then the shells were isolated, cleaned, washed and dried. For elimination of mineral, dried shells were kept in HCl 10% for 24 h. After washing, NaOH (2M) was added for 24 h. Then the shells were dried again and powdered. 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS), N-acetyl D-glucosamine and Bovine serum albumin (BSA) were obtained from sigma (St. Louis, Mo. USA). All other chemicals were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and were reagent grade.

Microorganisms and Culture Condition

Serratia marcescens B4A showing high chitinase activity (61) was isolated in our laboratory from water, wastewater and soil of shrimp culture ponds in Abadan and Boushehr (south of Iran) using agar plates containing nutrient agar 2% and colloidal chitin 0.1% at 30 ºC and pH 7.5 for 3 days. For the production of chitinase in Liquid medium, the isolated strain was cultured in an Erlenmeyer flask (250 ml) containing 0.5% colloidal chitin, 0.05% MgSO₄.7H₂O, 0.03% KH₂PO₄, 0.07% K₂HPO₄, 0.03% yeast extract, 0.03% peptone, 0.1% NaCl, 0.1% (NH4)₂SO₄, and 0.1% v/v trace elements solution (0.16% MnSO₄.2H₂O, 0.14% ZnSO₄.7H₂O, 0.5% FeSO₄.6H₂O and 0.2% CaCl₂) for 48 h at 30 ºC on a shaker incubator (200 rpm).

Enzyme Assay

For the measurement of chitinase activity, colloidal chitin was selected as the substrate. The reaction mixture containing 0.5 ml of 1% w/v colloidal chitin and 0.5 ml enzyme solution was incubated at 45 ºC for one hour. Then 3 ml 3, 5-dinitrosalicylic acid reagent was added for stopping the reaction followed by heating at 100 ºC for 5 min. After centrifugation, determination of reducing sugar in supernatant was accomplished by the modified method of Miller (29). Absorbance was measured at 530 nm using UV spectrophotometer along with substrate and blanks. For determination of enzyme unit, serial dilutions of N-acetylglosamine (from 0 to 50 mM) were prepared. One unit (U) of the chitinase activity was defined as amount of enzyme required to release 1 mmol of N-acetyl D-glucosamine (as a standard) from chitin / min.

Partial Purification and Determination of Protein Concentration

Serial concentrations of ammonium sulfate from 25 to 85% was added slowly to the enzyme solution and left at 4 ºC for at least 3 h with vigorous stirring. Then the solution was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min. Next, sediment was dissolved in minimum phosphate buffer 20 mM in optimum pH. After that, the concentrated solution dialyzed in phosphate buffer twice and was checked for maximum chitinolytic activity. Finally the protein concentration was determined by Bradford Method (4) using bovine serum albumin as a standard solution and the absorbance was measured at 595 nm.

Determination of Molecular Weight

The partially purified enzyme was resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE 12%) to determine its molecular weight and its purity by Laemmli method (18). Enzyme solutions obtained from culture medium in three conditions (a) without nitrogen resources, (b) without colloidal chitin but with glucose (both of them were partially purified) and (c) partially purified enzyme, and were used in SDS-PAGE electrophoresis for binding's competition. Then the proteins were separated from each other at constant voltage (100v). Next the electrophoresized gel bands were colorized with coomassie brilliant blue R-250 and destained using acetic acid and methanol. Finally the relative molecular mass of the protein was estimated using standard molecular weight (prestained protein ladder; Fermentas).

Effect of Temperature and pH on Enzyme Activity and Stability

First enzyme (1U/ml) and substrate were kept at proper temperature separately to reach thermal equilibrium. Then chitinase activity was examined by incubating the enzyme in 1% w/v colloidal chitin as substrate at various temperatures (10-90 ºC) for 15 min at pH 7.9 (optimum pH); after that the residual activity of the chitinase was measured at once. To determine the temperature stability, chitinase initially was pre-incubated at the different temperatures (10-90 ºC). Every 10 min (up to 90 min) samples were placed in ice for 30 min and then colloidal chitin was added and enzyme assay was done at 25 ºC.

To examine the optimum pH of the chitinase, 1% w/v colloidal chitin was prepared as the substrate at different pHs (2-10) by 50 mM phosphate-sodium acetate-glycine buffer and the chitinase was added to the substrate and then incubated in 45 ºC for 15 min. Finally, the remaining activities were determined. Monitoring the pH stability, chitinase was added to buffers with different pH for 1.5 h at 25ºC Followed by enzyme assay in optimum pH. Also pH stability of chitinase at 3, 8 and 10 at 25ºC in 3 h (every 15 min) were determined.

Effects of Metal Ions and Chemical Compounds

The enzyme was added to a final concentration of 1 mM in the substrate of different metal ions such as (choloridized Li⁺, AL³⁺, Ba²⁺, Co²⁺, Fe³⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺), (sulfated Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Zn²⁺), (Ag⁺ (AgNO₃), Ca²⁺ (CaCO₃), Cr³⁺ (K₂Cr₂O₇)) and chemical compounds (Citric acid, EDTA, SDS, PMSF, Iodoacetamide, Idoacetic acid, Tween 20 and Tween 80). Then they were incubated at 45ºC for 1 h. The relative activity of the treated enzyme to that of the untreated one was explained by the percentage ratio.

Michaelis and Rate Constant Determination

The Michaelis constant (K_m) and the maximum velocity (V_max) of the enzyme (1U/ml) were measured by the substrate concentration ranged from 0.0 mg/ml to 0.9 mg/ml. The K_m and V_max were accounted from a double reciprocal plot by the Lineweaver-Burk method (23).

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

In order to observe the effect of chitinase on the morphological changes of chitin, chitin in the absence and presence of enzyme were provided and fixed in a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde v/v and 2.5% paraformaldehyde v/v in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (prepared freshly) for 2 h. After being washed with distilled water, fixed samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol (a series of 25-50-75-95 and 100% 5 min), and then freeze dried. The dried samples were sputtered coated with gold. All the samples were seen and photographed in a SEM (LEO, 1455 VP, Germany).

Antifungal Activity of Chitinase

For the detection of chitinase antifungal activity, the zone of inhibition assay (57) was carried out. The mycelium of seven phytopathogenic fungi including: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, Bipolaris sp, Fusarium graminearum, Trichoderma reesei, Alternaria raphani, Alternaria brassicicola were inseminated in the center of the Petri plates containing potato dextrose agar (PDA). When the diameter of the colony was almost 2 cm, four sterile blank paper disks were located around with equal distance from the center of the plates.

Equal aliquots (50 µl) of phosphate buffer 0.02 M, cell-free media, partially purified chitinase, and 5-min-boiled partially purified chitinase were presented onto disks 1 to 4 respectively and then incubated at 25ºC until the colony started growing. What we observed was the control disk didn't indicate the inhibition of fungal growth but the others produced a crescent of inhibition around the disks due to with antifungal chitinase.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Molecular Weight and Protein Concentration

An enzyme solution partially purified by ammonium sulfate 65 % with maximum activity was examined for purity and molecular weight determination by SDS-PAGE. Molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated to be almost 54 kDa (Fig.1). Molecular weights of chitinases obtained from different strains of Serratia were 47-60 kDa (50). The molecular weight of chitinases from Serratia marcescens QM13 1466 (34) and Serratia plymuthica HRO_C 48 (14) were 58 kDa and 60.5 kDa respectively. The molecular weight of chitinases obtained from Enterobacter sp. was about 60 kDa. Molecular weight of chitinase from Enterobacter sp. NRG4 (9), Enterobacter sp. G-1 (33), Enterobacter agglomerans (7) and Enterobacter aerogenes (47) were 60 kDa, 60 kDa, 61 kDa and 42.5 kDa respectively that were almost similar to our results.

Effect of Temperature on the Enzyme

The enzyme was active in the temperature range of 20-60ºC with optimal activity at 45ºC (Fig. 2A), however chitinase thermostability was continuously decreased either when the time of incubation or the temperature increased (Fig. 2B, ^C). Chitinase was quite stable under 50ºC for 20 min (Fig. 2B) and the result of enzyme stability at 50 to 60ºC in the absence of substrate showed that it can maintain more than 50% of its original activity (^{Fig. 2C}). To our surprise, we found out that a 5ºC increase in temperature, would result in a 40 minute decrease in the stability suggesting a remarkable conformational changes in the enzyme integrity which in turn affects its activity (half-life of enzyme is less than 20 minutes at 55ºC and 60ºC compare to 50ºC). Thus, when the temperature was raised to 60ºC, it might affect the structure of enzymes and lead to reduced chitinase activity. The optimum temperature of chitinases obtained from other Serratia strains like S. marcescens BJL 200, S. marcescens 2170, S. marcescens NK1(50), S. plymuthica HRO_C 48 (14) and S. marcescens QM13 1466 (34) were 50-60 ºC, 60 ºC, 47 ºC, 55 ºC and 30 ºC respectively. Other Enterobacter strains that produced chitinase like Enterobacter sp. G-1 (33), E. aerogenes (43) and E. agglomerans (7) their optimum temperature were 40ºC, 55ºC and 40ºC respectively. Enterobacter sp. NRG4 (9) showed a maximum activity at 45ºC and it was stable at 45ºC for 1h which is similar to our results. Different temperature profile of chitinase produced by variety of bacterial sources has been reported. For example the optimum temperature activity of chitinase produced by Bacillus sp. NCTU2 (53) and Alcaligenes Xylosoxidans (45) were 60ºC and 50ºC respectively.

Effect of pH on the Enzyme

Chitinase showed optimum activity at pH 5 as justified by its pH profile (Fig. 3A) at 45 ºC. Chitinase was stable at pH range of 3-9 for 90 min at 25 ºC (Fig. 3B). Remaining activity of enzyme in pH 3, 8 and 10 at 25 ºC for 180 min was more than half of the original activity (Fig. 3C). Other Serratia strains that produced chitinase like S. marcescens BJL 200, S. marcescens NK1 (50) and S. plymuthica HRO_C 48 (14) showed a maximum activity at pH 6, 6.2 and 6.6 respectively. while chitinase produced by other strains of Enterobacter, such as Enterobacter sp. G-1 (33) and E. aerogenes (43) have been reported to have a pH optima 7 and 6 respectively. Also another chitinase produced by Enterobacter sp. NRG4 (9) with optimum pH 5.5 showed pH stability from pH 4.5 to 8.0, but in our test result the enzyme is active at a wider pH range and more stable. The optimal pH for the other bacterial chitinases such as Aeromonas sp. No.10S-24 (44) and Bacillus sp. NCTU2 (53) was reported 4 and 6.3, but they were stable between pH range 4 to 9 and 4 to 8.5 respectively.

Effects of Metal Ions and Chemicals Compounds on Chitinase Activity

Results of chitinase activity at pH 5 in the presence of different chemical compounds and metal ions with final concentration 1 mM were shown at table 1. Iodoacetamide and Idoacetic acid, a chemical modifier of cysteine residues almost didn't change the enzyme activity indicating that cysteine residues are not involved in catalytic site of chitinase (2). In addition, it's notable that all the surface-active detergents like SDS and Tweens (20 and 80) were stimulator of chitinase activity by 2%, 23% and 20% respectively. Perhaps these results are based on the fact that surface-active reagents might increase the turnover number of chitinase by increasing the contact frequency between the enzyme active site and the substrate which are accomplished through lowering the surface tension of the aqueous medium (15). Interestingly PMSF at 1mM concentration didn't inhibit the chitinase activity significantly; therefore it could be used to control the serine proteases activity of crude extract for preventing exhaustive degradation of proteins during downstream processes.

To investigate the effect of presence or absence of cations, on the activity, we used Li⁺, Ag⁺, Al³⁺, Ba²⁺, Ca²⁺, Cr³⁺, Cu²⁺, Fe³⁺, K⁺, Ni²⁺, Mg²⁺, Zn²⁺, and EDTA. In 1mM concentration, all of them offered partial inhibition (Table 1). These results are in line with those reported for other bacterial chitinase (14, 33, 45). Nevertheless Co²⁺ and Mn²⁺ were found as stimulator of chitinase activity 13% and 36% respectively (Table 1). Contrary to our results, Co²⁺ (14, 43) and Mn²⁺ (60, 48) inhibited bacterial chitinases activity but Mn²⁺ stimulated the fungal chitinases activity (20).

Michaelis Constant and Maximal Velocity

The substrate concentration effect on the hydrolysis rate of chitin degradation was studied. The K_m (for Chitin) and V_max values of this enzyme were calculated by Lineweaver-Burk (Fig. 4). The values of K_m and V_max were 8.3 mg/ml and 2.4 mmol/min, respectively. The K_m values of chitinase from different organisms were 1.41 mg/ml for Enterobacter sp. NPG4 (9), 2.88 mg/ml for E. aerogenes (43), 3 mg/ml for A. xylosoxidans (45) and Bacillus sp. WY22 (54).

Pattern of Degradation on Chitin

Observing the morphological changes of chitin powder treated by chitinase, we performed scanning electronic microscopy experiments. In the absence of chitinase, chitin powder showed almost a smooth surface (Fig. 5-A). However, when chitin was treated by chitinase (Fig. 5B, ^C and ^D), it showed cracks and pores in chitin surface and the number of pores increased significantly by increasing the time of exposure. Such an observation has been found for chitinase isolated from penicillium sp. LYG0704 by Lee et al. in 2009 (20) showed the same morphological changes. Our results implied that isolated chitinase is quite effective on chitin as the direct evidence because of evidence from scanning electron microscopy data.

Antifungal Activity of Chitinase

Figure 6A-D presents antifungal activity of chitinase against a wide range of phytopathogenic fungi such as Rhizoctonia solani (Fig 6A), Bipolaris sp. (Fig 6B), Aphanomyces raphani (Fig 6C), and Alternaria brassicicola (Fig 6D). However, it had no antifungal effects on S. sclerotiorum, F. graminearum, and T. reesei (data not shown). Dahiya et al. (9) identified antifungal chitinase against R. solani from Enterobacter sp. NRG4 with molecular weight 64 kDa. Antifungal chitinase also isolated from Bacillus subtilis CH426 (55), Bacillus cereus J1-1 (49), Bacillus sp. DAU101 (21) Cellulosimicrobium cellulans 191 (13) with molecular weight 64 kDa, 65 kDa 62 kDa and 61 kDa respectively. Obstruction with spore germination or germ tube elongation (39, 52), inflation and distortions of hyphal (1, 22, 10), release of chitin oligosaccharides from cell wall and cytoplasm leakage (47) were observed in fungi affected by chitinases.

The chitin has an intrinsic variability due to its natural origin and it exists in several forms with their specific properties each(3, 16). This polymer of fungi possesses principally the same structure as the chitin occurring in other organisms. However, a major difference results from the fact that fungal chitin is associated with other polysaccharides which do not occur in the exoskeleton of arthropods (41). Difference in chitinolytic ability must result from the subsite structure in the binding cleft (36). This implies that why the enzyme didn't show significant antifungal activity against other Fungi.

CONCLUSIONS

Protection of plants from disease produced by phytopathogenic fungi is one of the most important challenges in agriculture. The total losses as results of plant diseases reach almost 50% of the crop in developing countries. One-third of this is a consequence of fungal infections (40). Therefore finding biological products that could be used for biological fighting is very important in agriculture. Recent studies demonstrated that chitinase from plants (37, 40, 58) and microorganism (33, 7, 9, 43) are able to inhibit the fungal growth.

In this study, a native chitinase with antifungal activity against a wide range of phytopathogens was isolated from Serratia marcescens B4A, which is important since not all chitinases have antifungal activity. Fortunately this isolated microorganism is a native strain of Iran that its chitinase was found to be somewhat different from other reported chitinases in terms of its resistance to acidic medium. Furthermore, isolated chitinase in this study may have important implications on agriculture such as the biological control of insects which are plants pests.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (NIGEB), grants No: 365, ministry of science, Research and Technology of Iran and Iranian Fisheries Research Organization.

Submitted: May 18, 2010; Approved: January 31, 2011.

• 1. Akihiro, O.; Takashi, A.; Makoto, S. (1993) Production of the antifungal peptide antibiotic, iturin by Bacillus subtitilis NB22 in solid state fermentation J. Ferm. Bioeng. 75:23-27.
• 2. Aminzadeh, S.; Naderi-Manesh, H.; Khajeh, K.; Naderi-Manesh, M. (2006) Purification, characterization, kinetic properties, and thermal behavior of extracellular polygalacturonase produced by filamentous fungus Tetracoccosporium sp. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 135(3):193-208.
• 3. Aranaz, I.; Mengíbar, M.; Harris, R.; Paños, I.; Miralles, B.; Acosta, N.; Galed, G.; Heras, Á. (2009) Functional Characterization of Chitin and Chitosan. Current Chemical Biology 3:203-230.
• 4. Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein - dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72:248-252.
• 5. Chang, W.T.; Chen, C.S.; Wang, S.L. (2003) An antifungal chitinase produced by Bacillus cereus with shrimp and crab shell powder as a carbon source. Curr Microbiol 47(2):102-108.
• 6. Chang, W.T.; Chen, Y.C.; Jao, C.L. (2007) Antifungal activity and enhancement of plant growth by Bacillus cereus grown on shellfish chitin wastes. Bioresour Technol 98(6):1224-1230.
• 7. Chernin, L.S.; De La Fuente, L.; Sobolew, V. Haran, S. Vorgias, C.E. Oppenheim, A.B. Chet, I. (1997) Molecular cloning, structural analysis, and expression in Escherichia coli of a chitinase gene from Enterobacter agglomerans Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63:834-839.
• 8. Dahiya, N.; Tewari, R.; Hoondal, G.S. (2006) Biotechnological aspects of chitinolytic enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 71:773-782.
• 9. Dahiya, N.; Tewari, R.; Tiwari, R.P.; Hoondal, G.S. (2005) Chitinase from Enterobacter sp. NRG4: its purification, characterization and reaction pattern. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 8:134-145.
• 10. Elad, Y.; Chet, I.; Henis, Y. (1982) Degradation of plant pathogenic fungi by Trichoderma harzianum. Can. J. Microbiol. 28:719-725.
• 11. Ferracini-Santos, L.; Sato, H.H. (2009) Production of alkaline protease from Cellulosimicrobium cellulans. Braz. J. Microbiol 40:54-60.
• 12. Firmino, A.A.P.; Ulhoa, C.J.; Sousa, M.V.; Filho, E.X.F.; Ricart, C.A.O. (2002) Involvement of G proteins and cAMP in the production of chitinolytic enzymes by Trichoderma harzianum. Braz. J. Microbiol 33:169-173.
• 13. Fleuri, L.F.; Kawaguti, H.Y.; Sato, H.H. (2009) Production, purification and application of extracellular chitinase from Cellulosimicrobium cellulans 191. Braz. J. Microbiol 40:623-630.
• 14. Frankowski, J.; Lorito, M.; Scala, F.; Schmid, R.; Berg, G.; Bahl, H. (2001) Purification and properties of two chitinolytic enzyme of Serratia plymuthica HRO_C48. Arch. Microbiol. 176:421-426.
• 15. Kapoor, M.; Beg, Q.K. Bhushan, B.; Dadhich, K.S.; Hoondal, G.S. (2000) Production and partial purification and characterization of a thermo-alkali stable polygalacturonase from Bacillus sp. MG-CP-2. Process Biochem. 36:467-473.
• 16. Kathleen Van de Velde, K.; Kiekens, P. (2004) Structure analysis and degree of substitution of chitin, chitosan and dibutyrylchitin by FT-IR spectroscopy and solid state ¹³C NMR. Carbohydrate Polymers 58:409-416.
• 17. Kawase, T.; Yokokawa, S.; Saito, A.; Fujii, T. Nikaidou, N.; Miyashita, K.; Watanabe, T. (2006) Comparison of enzymatic and antifungal properties beetween family 18 and 19 chitinase from S. coelicolor A3(2) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70:988-998.
• 18. Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680-685.
• 19. Leah, R.; Tommerup, H.; Svendsen, I.; Mundy, J. (1991) Biochemical and molecular characterization of three barley seed proteins with antifungal activity. J. Biol. Chem. 66:1464-1573.
• 20. Lee, Y.G.; Chung, K.C.; Wi, S.G.; Lee, J.C.; Bae, H.J. (2009) Purification and properties of a chitinase from Pneicillium sp. LYG 0704. Protein Expr. Purif. 65:244-250.
• 21. Lee, Y.S.; Park, I.H.; Yoo, J.S.; Chung, S.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Cho, Y.S.; Ahn, S.C.; Kim, C.M. Choi, Y.L. (2007) Cloning, purification, and characterization of chitinase from Bacillus sp DAU101 Bioresour. Technol 98:2734-2741.
• 22. Lim, S.H.; Kim, K. S.; Kim, S.D. (1991) Pseudomonas stutzeri YPL-1 genetic transformation and antifungal mechanism againts Fusarium solani an agent of plant root rot Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:510-516.
• 23. Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. (1934) The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56:658-666.
• 24. Liu, D.; Caia, J.; Xie, C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y. (2010 ) Purification and partial characterization of a 36-kDa chitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. colmeri, and its biocontrol potential. Enzyme Microbial. Technol. 46:252-256.
• 25. Madhavan Nampoothiri, K.; Baiju, T.V.; Sandhya, C.; Sabu, A.; Szakacs, G.; Ashok Pandey, A. (2004) Process optimization for antifungal chitinase production by Trichoderma harzianum. Process Biochemistry 39:1583-1590.
• 26. Marco, J.L.D.; Valadares-Inglis, M.C.; Felix, C.R. (2003) Production of hydrolytic enzymes by Trichoderma isolates with antagonistic activity against Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom of cocoa. Braz. J. Microbiol 34:33-38.
• 27. Matroudi, S.; Zamani, M.R.; Motallebi, M. (2008) Molecular cloning of chitinase 33 (chit33) gene from Trichoderma atroviride. Braz. J. Microbiol 39:433-437.
• 28. Mendonsa, E.S.; Vartak, P.H.; Rao, J.U.; Deshpande, M.V. (1996) An enzyme from Myrothecium verrucaria that degrades insect cuticle for biocontrol of Aedes aegypti mosquito. Biotechnol. Lett. 18:373-376.
• 29. Miller, G.L. (1959) use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar Analytical chemistry 31:426-428.
• 30. Miller, M.; Palofarvi, A.; Rangger, A.; Reeslev, M.; Kjoller, A. (1998) The use of fluorogenic substrates to measure fungal presence and activity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:613-617.
• 31. Narayana, K.J.P., Vijayalakshmi, M. (2009) Chitinase production by Streptomyces sp. ANU 6277. Braz. J. Microbiol 40:725-733.
• 32. Ng, T.B. (2004) Antifungal protein and peptides of leguminous and nonleguminous origins. Peptides 25:1215-1222.
• 33. Park, J.K.; Morita, K.; Fukumoto, I.; Yamasaki, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Kawamukai, M.; Matsuda, H. (1997) Purification and characterization of the chitinase (Chi A) from Enterobacter sp. G-1 Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61:684-689.
• 34. Roberts, R.L.; Cabib, E. (1982) Serratia marcescens chitinase: one step purification and use for the determination of chitin. Analytical Biochemistry 127:402-412.
• 35. Santos, I.S.; Cunha, M.D.; Machado, O.L.T.; Gomes, V.M. (2004 ) A chitinase from Adenanthera pavonina L. seeds: purification, characterisation and immunolocalisation. Plant Science 167:1203-1210.
• 36. Sasaki, C.; Yokoyama, A.; Itoh, Y.; Hashimoto, M.; Watanabe, T.; Fukamizo, T. (2002) Comparative Study of the Reaction Mechanism of Eamily 18 Chitinases from Plants and Microbes. J Biochem 131:557-564.
• 37. Schlumbaum, A.; Mauch, F.; Vogeli, U. (1986) Plant chitinases are potent inhibitors of fungal growth. Nature 324:355-356.
• 38. Shimono, K.; Matsuda, H.; Kawamukai, M. (2002) Functional expression of chitinase and chitosanase, and their effects on morphologies in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 66:1143-1147.
• 39. Silo-Suh, L.A.; Lethbridge, B.J.; Raffel, S.J.; He, H.; Clardy, J.; Handelsman, J. (1994) Biological activities of two fungistatic antibiotics produced by Bacillus cereus UW85 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:2030-2033.
• 40. Singh, A.; Isuas Kirubakavan, S.; Sakthivel, N. (2007) Heterologous expression of new antifungal chitinase from wheat. Protein expression and purification 56:100-109.
• 41. Steinbüchel, A.; De Baets, S.; Vandamme, E.J. (2002) Biopolymers. Polysaccharides II: Polysaccharides from Eukaryotes Wiley-VCH
• 42. Takiguchi, Y. (1991) Physical properties of chitinous materials In: R.H. Chen and H.C. Chen (eds.), Advances in Chitin Science, Vol. III Proceedings from the third Asia - Pacific Chitin, Chitosan Jikken manual chapter 1, Gihodou Shupan Kabushki Kaisha, Japan, 1-7.
• 43. Tang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Ding, S.; Liu, S.; Yang, Z. (2001) Purification and properties of chitinase from Enterobacter aerogenes. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 41:82-86.
• 44. Ueda, M.; Fugiwar, A.; Kawaguchi, T.; Arai, M. (1995) Purification and some properties of six chitinases from Aeromonas sp. No. 10S-24. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59:2162-2164.
• 45. Vaidya, R.; Roy, S. Macmil, S.; Gandhi, S.; Vyas, P.; Chhatpar, H.S. (2003) Purification and characterization of chitinase from Alcaligenes xylosoxydans. Biotechnol. Lett. 25:715-717.
• 46. Verburg, J.G.; Huynh, Q.K. (1991) Purification and characterisation of an antifungal chitinase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant physiol. 95:450-616.
• 47. Vogelsang, R.; Barz, W. (1993) Purification, characterization and differential hormonal regulation of a B-1, 3-glucanas and two chitinases from chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Planta. 189:60-69.
• 48. Wang, S.L.; Chen, S.J.; Wang, C.L. (2008) Purification and characterization of chitinases and chitosanases from a new species strain Pseudomonas sp.TKU015 using shrimp shells as a substrate Carbohydrate Research 343:1171-1179.
• 49. Wang, S.L.; Hwang, J.R. (2001) Microbial reclamation of shellfish wastes for the production of chitinases. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 28:376-382.
• 50. Wang, S.L.; Peng, J.H.; Liang, T.W.; Liu, K.C. (2008) Purification and characterization of a chitosanase from Serratia marcescens TKU011. Carbohyd Res 343:1316-1323.
• 51. Wang, S.L.; Yenc, Y.H.; Tzengc, G.C.; Hsiehc, C. (2005) Production of antifungal materials by bioconversion of shellfish chitin wastes fermented by Pseudomonas fluorescence K-188. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 36:49-56.
• 52. Wang, S.L.; Yieh, T.C.; Shih, I.L. (1999) Production of antifungal compounds by Pseudomonas aeruginosa K-187 using shrimp and crab shell powder as a carbon source. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 25:142-148.
• 53. Wen, C.M.; Tseng, C.S.; Cheng, C.Y.; Li, Y.K. (2002) Purification, characterization and cloning of a chitinase from Bacillus sp. NCTU2. Biotechnol Appl. Biochem. 35:213-219.
• 54. Woo, C.J.; Park, H. D. (2003) An extracellular Bacillus sp. chitinase for the production of chitotriose as a major chitinolytic product. Biotechnol. Lett. 25:409-412.
• 55. Yang, C.Y.; Ho, Y.C.; Pang, J.C.; Huang, S.S.; Tschen, J.S.M. (2009) Cloning and expression of an antifungal chitinase gene of novel Bacillus subtilis isolated from Taiwan patato field Bioresour. Technol 100:1454-1458.
• 56. Yasir, M.; Aslam, Z.; Kim, S.W.; Lee, S.W.; Jeon, C.O.; Chung, Y.R. (2009) Bacterial community composition and chitinase gene diversity of vermicompost with antifungal activity Bioresource Technology 100:4396-4403.
• 57. Ye, X.; Ng, T.B. (2000) Mungin, a novel cyclophilin - like antifungal protein from the mung bean Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 273:1111-1115.
• 58. Ye, X.; Ng, T.B. (2005) A chitinase with antifungal activity from the Mung bean. Protein Expr. Purif. 40:230-236.
• 59. Yu, J.; Liu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Liu, X.; San, Q.; Yan, J.; Qi, X.; Fan, S. (2008) Effect of liquid culture requirements on antifungal antibiotic production by Streptomyces rimosus MY02 Bioresour. Technol 99:2081-2091.
• 60. Yuli, P.E.; Suhartono, M.T.; Rukayadi, Y.; Hwang, J.K.; Pyun, Y.R. (2004) Characteristic of thermostable chitinase enzyme from the Indonesian Bacillus sp. 13.26. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 35:147-153.
• 61. Zarei, M.; Aminzadeh, S.; Zolgharnein, H.; Safahieh, A.; Ghoroghi, A.; Motallebi, A.; Daliri, M.; Lotfi, A.S. (2010) Serratia marcescens B4A chitinase product optimization using Taguchi approach. Iran. J. Biotech 8(4):252-262.
• 62. Zees, A.C.; Pyrpassopoulos, S.; Vorgias, C.E. (2009) Insights into the role of the (alpha+beta) insertion in the TIM-barrel catalytic domain, regarding the stability and the enzymatic activity of chitinase A from Serratia marcescens. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794(1):23-31.
• 63. Zhang, Z.; Yuen, G.Y. (2000) The Role of Chitinase Production by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Strain C3 in Biological Control of Bipolaris sorokiniana. Phytopathology 90(4):384-389.
• 64. Zhu, Y.; Pan, J.; Qiu, J.; Guan, X. (2008) Isolation and characterization of a chitinase gene from entomopathogenic fungus Verticillium lecanii. Braz. J. Microbiol 39:314-320.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  21 Dec 2011
• Date of issue
  Sept 2011

History

• Received
  18 May 2010
• Accepted
  31 Jan 2011