Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
Print version ISSN 1517-8382
Braz. J. Microbiol. vol.43 no.1 São Paulo Jan./Mar. 2012
Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from hospitals in siedlce (Poland)
Katarzyna WolskaI,*; Barbara KotI; Antoni JakubczakII
IUniversity of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Department of Microbiology, Poland
IIState College of Computer Science and Business Administration in Łomża, Food Technology Institute, Poland
A total of 62 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from two hospitals in Siedlce (Poland) were studied by repetitive element based PCR (rep-PCR) using BOX primer. BOX-PCR results revealed the presence of 7 numerous genotypes and 31 unique patterns among isolates. Generally, the strains of P. aeruginosa were characterized by resistance to many antibiotics tested and by differences in serogroups and types of growth on cetrimide agar medium. However, the P. aeruginosa strains isolated from faeces showed much lower phenotypic and genotypic variations in comparison with strains obtained from other clinical specimens. It was observed that genetic techniques supported by phenotypic tests have enabled to conduct a detailed characterization of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from a particular environment at a particular time.
Key words: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, BOX-PCR, antibiotic resistance, serotyping, cetrimide agar.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous pathogen prevalent in hospital environments. It can cause severe nosocomial infections, particularly among immunocompromised patients. People with respiratory, gastrointestinal, urinary tract, and wound infections as well as burn victims, individuals with cancer, and patients hospitalized in intensive care units are affected by P. aeruginosa mostly due to nosocomial spread and cross contaminations (9, 10, 14). P. aeruginosa accounts for 10% of all hospital acquired infections, a site specific prevalence which may vary from one unit to another and from study to study (11). Various possible sources of P. aeruginosa infection in hospitals have been identified, i.e., tap water, disinfectants, food, sinks, mops, medical equipment, hospital personnel and others (7, 14, 19).
P. aeruginosa can be internally divided into subgroups by classical methods such as: biotyping, serotyping, pyocin typing, phage typing and antibiotic sensitivity of tested strains. However, the discriminatory power is much lower than that obtained by molecular typing methods. DNA typing methods have been frequently used to investigate the diversity of collections of P. aeruginosa (20). These methods include pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (8, 21, 22), ribotyping (6, 8), restriction fragment length polymorphic DNA analysis (RFLP) (6), random amplified polymorphic DNA assay (RAPD) (8, 13, 21), arbitrary primed PCR (AP-PCR) (4), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (21), and repetitive element based PCR (rep-PCR) (6, 22). Rep-PCR is a method for fingerprinting bacterial genomes, which examines strain-specific patterns obtained from PCR amplification of repetitive DNA elements present within bacterial genomes. Three main sets of repetitive elements are used for typing purposes: the repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) sequence, the enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence (ERIC) and the BOX elements (16).
The aim of this work was to estimate intra-species differentiation of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from two hospitals in Siedlce (Poland) using phenotypic methods (serotyping, susceptibility to chemotherapeutic agents, and type of growth on cetrimide agar medium) and the genotypic method (BOX-PCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 62 strains of P. aeruginosa, were originally isolated from a variety of clinical specimens: faeces (26), urine (12), blood (1), bronchial washings (8), sputum (1), wound swab (9), throat swab (2), ulceration swab (1), swab from skin round tracheotomy (1) and from ear (1). The bacteria were obtained from 62 patients from different wards of the municipal hospital, main hospital and outpatients΄ department in Siedlce (Poland), between December 2005 and March 2006. The strains were identified as P. aeruginosa on the basis of typical morphology by gram-negative staining, a positive oxidase reaction, growth at 42ºC and conventional biochemical tests using the Api 20NE system (Bio-Mérieux, France). We also identified P. aeruginosa by PCR amplification of 16 S ribosomal RNA (12). All isolates resulted in a positive reaction. The control strain of P. aeruginosa NCTC 6749 was also examined. Stock cultures were stored in tripticase soy broth (TSB, Difco, USA) containing 20% glycerol at -80ºC.
Isolates were grown in TSB at 37ºC for 24 h and DNA was extracted by using the Genomic DNA Pre Plus (A&A Biotechnology, Poland). Rep-PCR fingerprinting was carried out using one BOX primer of sequence 5' - CTA CGG CAA GGC GAC GCT GAC G - 3'. Amplification was carried out with a 10x PCR buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, 0.5% Nonidet P40, 0.5% Tween 20) in a total reaction of 50 µL containing 2.5 mM dNTP, 20 mM MgCl2, 100 pmol of primer, 2 µL of genomic template DNA, and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (DNA Gdansk, Poland). Rep-PCR typing was carried out according to Dawson et al. (6) using a PTC-100 Programmable Thermo Controller (MJ Research, USA) according to the following procedure. Initial denaturation at 94ºC for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of PCR consisting of denaturation at 94ºC for 1 min, annealing at 48ºC for 2 min, and extension at 72ºC for 2 min; in the last cycle, the extension time was 5 min. The PCR product (10 µl) was analysed using a 2% agarose gel in the TBE buffer [5.4 g l-1 Tris, 2.75 g l-1 Boric acid, 0.37 g l-1 EDTA (pH 8.0)] and photographed under the UV light. The size of the products was analyzed in comparison to a M100-1000 bp ladder M.W. size marker (DNA Gdansk, Poland).
Pyocin production was tested on selective Cetrimide Agar (Merc, Germany). Serotyping was determined by the slide agglutination test with 16 monovalent antisera numbered O1 to O16 and 4 polyvalent antisera [PMA (O1 + O3 + O4 + O6), PME (O2 + O5 + O15 + O16), PMF (O7 + O8 + O11 + O12), PMC (O9 + O10 + O13 + O14)] (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, France) as recommended by the manufacturer. Susceptibility to antibacterial drugs was studied by the disk diffusion method according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) (3) for 12 following antimicrobial agents (Bio-Mérieux, France): carbenicillin (CB, 100 µg), mezlocillin (MZ, 75 µg), piperacillin (PIP, 100 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP, 100 µg+10 µg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), imipenem (IMP, 10 µg), meropenem (MEM, 30 µg), gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), netilmicin (NET, 30 µg), amikacin (AN, 30 µg) and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg).
BOX-PCR fingerprinting revealed 38 genetic patterns, among them 7 main genotypes, containing 3 to 8 isolates and 31 other unique patterns. The clusters were shown in 2 to 11 bands between 280-1550 bp. Over half of the isolates had 5 to 8 bands per pattern. The most characteristic products of PCR for P. aeruginosa were the following: 200, 420, 650, 1200 and 1400 bp (Fig. 1). Two of the genotypes (8 and 21) consisted of 7 (11.3%) and 8 (12.9%) isolates, respectively. The next two numerous genotypes (4 and 13) contained 4 (6.45%) isolates. All these isolates were obtained from faeces of patients hospitalized in the Paediatric Ward of the Main and Infectious Ward of the Municipal hospitals. The remaining three numerous genotypes (11, 23 and 5) consisted of isolates from wound (3 isolates) of patients of Orthopaedic and Orthopaedic-Traumatical Ward; bronchial washings (3) of patients of Neurological Ward, and from urine (2), and wound (1) of patients being treated in Orthopaedic, Urologic and Rehabilitation wards of the Main Hospital. Other unique types were collected from the following clinical specimens: urine (83.3%), wound (55.5%), bronchial washings (62.5%), faeces (11.5%) and from sputum (1), throat swab (2), ulceration swab (1), swab from skin round tracheotomy (1), blood (1), and from ear (1). This data demonstrated that isolates from urine, wound and bronchial washings were highly heterogeneous; among 12, 9 and 8 isolates, 11, 7 and 6 respectively different clusters appeared. While the group of isolates from faeces showed slightly genetic variation; in the group of 26 isolates we detected 7 genotypes.
Detailed data on comparison of genotypic and phenotypic strain features are presented in Table 1.
All tested strains were agglutinable. Forty three (69.3%) of 62 strains gave agglutination with the monovalent O6 serum. They were isolated from faeces (100%), urine (66.7%), bronchial washings (37.5%), wound (44.4%) and single strains from throat swab and swab from skin round tracheotomy. Six (9.7%) strains obtained from wound (33.3%), urine (16.7%) and sputum (1) reacted with serum O1. Eight (12.9%) strains isolated from bronchial washings (50.0%), wound (22.2%), throat swab (1) and ulceration (1) were typed only by polyvalent sera: PMA (5), PMF (2) and PMC (1). Individual isolates from urine, bronchial washings and blood were assigned to following sera: O9, O10, O15 and O16. A variety of serotypes were demonstrated among 12 isolates from urine (O6, O1, O9, O10, PMA), 9 isolates from wound (O6, O1, PMF) and 8 isolates from bronchial washings (O6, O15, PMA). While 26 of the strains isolated from faeces were typed only by one sera (O6). Four different serotypes (O6, O1, O15, PMC) were observed among 9 isolates from patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit Ward of the Main Hospital, whereas all strains isolated from patients of the Infectious Ward (17 isolates) of the Municipal Hospital and the Paediatric Ward (10 isolates) of the Main Hospital belonged to one (O6) serotype. There was correlation between serotypes and genotypes of P. aeruginosa strains. The strains belonging to the same serotype were classified to the same genotypic type (PMA serotype genotype 23; O1 serotype genotype 5), however O6 serotype was classified to four genotypes: 4, 8, 13 and 21 .
The total of 62 P. aeruginosa strains were tested on selective cetrimide agar. A celadon type of growth appeared most frequently; 38 (61.3%) strains. These strains were isolated mainly from faeces, urine and wound (92.3%, 58.3% and 44.4% respectively). Eleven (17.7%) strains produced green colonies. Most of them were isolated from bronchial washings (50.0%) and wound (33.3%). Seven (11.3%) strains isolated from bronchial washings (37.5%), urine (25.0%) and wound (11.1%) grew in cetrimide agar producing green-yellow colonies. Blue and green-blue types of growth were most rarely found, 6.45% and 3.2% respectively. P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the faeces of patients being treated at the Infectious Ward of the Municipal Hospital, and the Paediatric Ward of the Main Hospital produced nearly 90% and 100% celadon colonies respectively. While the strains isolated from the other clinical specimens of patients hospitalized in different wards (excluding the Paediatric ward) of the Main Hospital produced this type of growth by a much lower degree (47.5%). Six out of seven numerous genotypes consisted of strains that grew on selective cetrimide medium producing celadon type (with exception of two strains). Only the strains isolated from bronchial washings of genotype 23 produced green colonies.
The majority of P. aeruginosa isolates showed much differentiated resistance to antimicrobial agents tested. Different resistance patterns in various arrangements were observed from sensitivity to all tested antibiotics, through resistance to only two or three antibiotics, to multidrug resistance for almost all tested drugs. Strains isolated from faeces (serotype O6) of patients hospitalized in the Infectious Ward of the Municipal Hospital and the Paediatric Ward of the Main Hospital, were generally less resistant to chemotherapeutic agents than strains isolated from the other clinical specimens obtained from patients being treated in different wards (excluding the Paediatric ward) of the Main Hospital (CB-53.8%/72.2%, MZ-88.5%/86.1%, PIP-3.8%/30.55%, TZP-0%/19.4%, ATM-57.7%/19.4%, CAZ-15.4%/19.4%, IMP-3.8%/25%, MEM-7.6%/38.9%, CN-46.1%/72.2%, NET-42.3%/86.1%, AN-26.9%/38.4% and CIP-0%/25%). Among studied strains, 14 (22.3%) were multidrug resistant (MDR). They were resistant to at least 4 out of the 6 antipseudomonal classes of antimicrobial agents, i.e., antipseudomonal penicilins, monobactams, cephalosporins, carbapenems, quinolones and aminoglycosides. These strains were obtained from wound (33.3%), urine (25.0%), bronchial washings (25.0%), faeces (11.5%) and individual isolates from sputum, blood and ear of patients hospitalized in different wards of the Main Hospital (11 strains) and the Municipal Hospital (1) as well as the outpatients΄ department (2). They belonged to the following serotypes: O1, O6, PMA, PMF, O15, O16. However most of them were serotype O1 (35.7%). Results of antibiotic resistance and genotyping showed poor correlation. Resistance patterns from bacterial isolates which had identical genotypes differed in up to 9 antibiotics.
The hospital environment remarkably promotes selection and quick distribution of resistant strains. One of the essential steps leading to a reduction of nosocomial infections is a constant monitoring of etiological agents and resistance of intrahospital strains. It is of crucial importance to carry out epidemiological surveys including a detailed characteristic and relationship among strains isolated in particular environment and time, as well as to become aware of risk factors, sources and ways of infection distribution (1, 8, 9, 13). To obtain reliable results the application of molecular methods seems to be inevitable.
To differentiate precisely among P. aeruginosa isolated from two hospitals in Siedlce (Poland), BOX-PCR typing was carried out. PCR fingerprinting has shown 38 genetic patterns, among them 7 main genotypes consisting of 3 to 8 strains and 31 other unique patterns. High number of genotypic patterns pointed to marked intrahospital differentiation of P. aeruginosa strains that are widely distributed in nature, especially in humid environments. It indicated various sources of strains and their constant exchange. Some strains were generally resistant to tested antibiotics, what confirmed the development of secondary resistance and their intrahospital selection. Based on dates of strain isolation, and their resistance to antibiotics, it is highly probable that selection of highly resistant isolates takes place in ICU, Urologic and Orthopedic wards where P. aeruginosa is one of the most frequent and severe causes of infection, especially in patients with respiratory, urinary and wound infections. Several studies have demonstrated associations with a source of P. aeruginosa infection and antibiotic resistance (1, 5, 18, 24). The other strains of genotypes, especially those, which consisted of strains from faeces (serotype O6) taken from patients hospitalized in the Infectious Ward of the Municipal Hospital and the Paediatric Ward of the Main Hospital, frequently expressed susceptibility to tested antimicrobial agents. This proved incidence of exogenous strains entering the hospital environment. Some of the numerous genotypes were distributed in one, or more than one unit. This may indicate that cross contamination among patients lead to the spread of these genotypes among the various units, possibly through transient hand carriage by health care personnel due to contact with contaminated surfaces, or by patient contact with contaminated surfaces or medical equipment (19). The incidence of the same genotypes of P. aeruginosa in two different hospitals drew attention to a possibility of a long-distance strain transmission, which might be linked to the movement of patients, visitors, medical and paramedical staff. The importance of cross acquisition in the epidemiology of nosocomial colonization and infection with P. aerugionsa was reported by others (1, 8, 25). Fiett et al. (8) demonstrated clonal relations within populations of P. aeruginosa strains isolated in four different hospitals in Poland. Bergmans et al. (1) who studied 100 patients admitted to an ICU ward showed that cross colonization accounted for 50% of all cases of acquired P. aeruginosa colonization, and the rest of 50% of patients were probably colonized from endogenous sources. Cross transmission and treatment failure were also the two main problems at Turkish medical centers (25).
This study demonstrated that BOX-PCR is a rapid, highly discriminatory and reproducible assay that proved to be powerful surveillance tools for typing as well as characterizing clinical P. aeruginosa isolates. This is in agreement with the studies of Syrmis et al. (22), in which the BOX-PCR method showed the high discriminatory power. These authors reported six major clonal groups, and 58 distinct clonal groups among 163 P. aeruginsa strains isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis.
P. aeruginosa strains were also verified by classical typing techniques. The studied strains showed poor differentiation of phenotypic features, especially such as: serotypes and types of growth on cetrimide agar. The total of 62 P. aeruginosa strains were classified into 9 different serotypes. Most of them (69.3%) belonged to O6 serotype, secondly to serotype O1 (9.7%) (the dominant type among MDR strains). The observed strains demonstrated 5 types of growth on cetrimide agar medium. The celadon type appeared most frequently (61.3%) whereas the green or green-yellow types were rarer (17.7 and 11.3%). The frequency of distribution of the O antigen types differs considerably in various publications. Czekajło-Kołodziej et. al. (4) demonstrated among over 50% of clinical P. aeruginosa strains isolated from the lower respiratory tract of patients admitted to ICU the production of green-yellow colonies, typing by O11 sera, and resistance to many antibiotics. Muller-Premru and Gubina (15) observed two O serotypes 11 and 6 to be prevalent (36% and 14.4% respectively) among clinical isolates. Antibiotic resistance of strains was higher in serotype O11 than in serotype O6. In a study of 73 P. aeruginosa strains from various clinical and environmental sources, Pirnay et al. (17) reported the predominant serotypes to be O11 (15.1%), O1 (12.3%), O6 (10.9%) and O12 (9.6%). Amongst 48 AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) types isolated from burns patients, 58.3% were reported as serotypes O1, O6, O11 or O12 (19). In a survey of 92 genetically distinct bacteraemia isolates, O6 (25.0%) and O11 (18.0%) were reported to be the most common serotypes (2). In a study of 23 isolates from contact lens wearers, Thuruthyil et al. (23) reported O1 (30.0%), O6 (17.0%) and O11 (17.0%) as the most common serotypes.
In conclusion, among all used methods in this work BOX-PCR turned out to be a powerful tool for the study of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates diversity. However, we suggest that maximum discrimination can be best achieved by a combination of phenotypic and genotypic methods.
We thank Mr. Henryk Matok for technical assistance. We are also grateful to Mrs. Agnieszka Krechowska for the provision of the bacterial strains. This work was supported by grants from the Nature Faculty, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce (Poland).
1. Bergmans, D.C.; Bonten, M.J.; Vantiel, F.H. (1998). Cross colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa of patients in an intensive care unit. Thorax. 53 (12), 1053-1058. [ Links ]
2. Berthelot, P.; Attree, I.; Plesiat, J.; Chabert, J.; de Bentzmann, S.; Pozzetto, B.; Grattard, F. (2003). Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of type III secretion system in a cohort of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia isolates: evidence for a possible association between O serotypes and exo genes. J. Infect. Dis. 188 (4), 512-518. [ Links ]
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial testing (2006). 16th informational supplement M100-S16. Wayne, Pa: CLSI. [ Links ]
4. Czekajło-Kołodziej, U.; Giedrys-Kalemba, S.; Mędrala, D. (2006). Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from hospitals in the north-west region of Poland. Pol. J. Microbiol. 55 (2), 103-112. [ Links ]
5. Dambrauskienė, A.; Adukauskienė, D.; Jeroch, J.; Vitkauskienė, A. (2009). Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: associations with a source of infection and antibiotic resistance. Medicina (Kaunas). 45 (1), 1-7. [ Links ]
6. Dawson, S.L.; Fry, J.C.; Dancer, B.N. (2002). A comparative evaluation of five typing techniques for determining the diversity of fluorescent pseudomonads. J. Microbiol. Meth. 50, 9-22. [ Links ]
7. Deplano, A.; Denis, O.; Poirel, L.; Hocquet, D.; Nonhoff, C.; Byl, B.; Nordmann, P.; Vincent, J.L.; Struelens, M.J. (2005). Molecular characterization of an epidemic clone of panantibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43 (3), 1198-1204. [ Links ]
8. 301.Fiett, J.; Trzciński, K.; Hryniewicz, W.; Gniatkowski, M. (1998). Molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains recovered from nosocomial infections caused by Pseudomonas aerugionsa. Przeg. Epid. 52 (4), 427-440 (in Polish). [ Links ]
9. Hauser, A.R.; Sriram, P. (2005). Severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Tackling the conundrum of drug resistance. Postgrad. Med. 117 (1), 41-48. [ Links ]
10. Hoiby, N.; Pedersen, S.S.; Shand, G.H.; Dőring, G.; Holder, I.A. (1989). Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Chemother. Basel. Karger. 42, 124-129. [ Links ]
11. Jones, R.N.; Croco, M.A.; Kugler, K.C.; Pfaller, M.A.; Beach, M.L. (2000). Respiratory tract pathogens isolated from patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia: frequency of occurrence and susceptibility patterns from the Sentry Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 37 (2), 115-125. [ Links ]
12. Kingsford, N.M.; Raadsma, H.W. (1995). Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ovine fleece washings by PCR amplication of 16S ribosomal RNA. Vet. Microbiol. 47, 61-70. [ Links ]
13. Liu, Y.; Davin-Regli, A.; Bosi, C.; Charrel, R.N.; Bollet, C. (1996). Epidemiological investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa nosocomial bacteraemia isolates by PCR-based DNA fingerprinting analysis. J. Med. Microbiol. 45 (5), 359-365. [ Links ]
14. Morrison, A.J.; Wentzel, R.P. (1984). Epidemiology of infections due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6, S627-S642. [ Links ]
15. Muller-Premru, M.; Gubina, M. (2000). Serotype, antimicrobial susceptibility and clone distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a university hospital. Zetralbl. Bacteriol. 289 (8), 857-867. [ Links ]
16. Olive, M.D.; Bean, P. 1999. Principles and applications of methods for DNA-based typing of microbial organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37 (6), 1661-1669. [ Links ]
17. Pirnay, J.P.; De Vos, D.; Cochez, C.; Biloq, F.; Vanderkelen, A.; Zizi, M.; Ghyseles, B.; Cornelis, P. (2002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays an epidemic population structure. Environ. Microbiol. 4, 898-911. [ Links ]
18. Pirnay, J.P.; De Vos, D.; Cochez, C.; Biloq, F.; Pirson, J.; Struelens, M.; Duinslaeger, L.; Cornelis, P.; Zizi, M.; Vanderkelen, A. (2003). Molecular epidemiolology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in a burn unit: persistence of a multidrug resistant clone and a silver sulfadizine-resistant clone. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41 (3), 1192-1202. [ Links ]
19. Pittet, D.; Dharan, S.; Touveneau, S.; Sauvan, V.; Perneger, T.V. (1999). Bacterial contamination of the hands of hospital staff during routine patient care. Arch. Intern. Med. 159 (8), 821-826. [ Links ]
20. Speert, D.P. (2002). Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Biosci. 1 (7), e354-361. [ Links ]
21. Speijer, H.; Savelkoul, P.H.M.; Bonten, M.J.; Stobberingh, E.E.; Tjhie, J.H.T. (1999). Application of different genotyping methods for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a setting of endemicity in an intensive care unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37 (11), 3654-3661. [ Links ]
22. Syrmis, M.W.; O´Carrol, M.R.; Sloots, T.P.; Coulter, C.; Wainwright, C.E.; Bell, S.C.; Nissen, M.D. (2004). Rapid genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates harboured by adult and paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis using repetitive-element-based PCR assays. J. Med. Microbiol. 53 (11), 1089-1096. [ Links ]
23. Thuruthyil, S.J.; Zhu, H.; Willcox, M.D. (2001). Serotype and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from contact lens wearers. Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol. 29 (3), 147-149. [ Links ]
24. Yang, C.H.; Lee, S.; Su, P.W.; Yang, C.S.; Chuang, L.Y. (2008). Genotype and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Taiwan. Microb. Drug Resist. 14 (4), 281-288. [ Links ]
25. Yetkin, G.; Otlu, B.; Cicek, A.; Kuzucu, C.; Durmaz, R. (2006). Clinical, microbiologic, and epidemiologic characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a University Hospital, Malatya, Turkey. Am. J. Infect. Control. 34 (4), 188-192. [ Links ]
Submitted: December 10, 2010; Returned to authors for corrections: March 22, 2011; Approved: June 06, 2011.
*Corresponding Author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce Prusa Str. 12, 08-110 10.Siedlce, Poland.; Tel.: (+4825) 6431340 Fax: (+4825) 6431353.; E-mail: email@example.com