Reducing lactate secretion by ldhA Deletion in L-glutamate- producing strain Corynebacterium glutamicum GDK-9

RESEARCH PAPER

Reducing lactate secretion by ldhA Deletion in L-glutamate- producing strain Corynebacterium glutamicum GDK-9

Dalong Zhang^{I, II}; Dan Guan^III; Jingbo Liang^{I, II}; Chunqian Guo^{I, II}; Xixian Xie^{I, II}; Chenglin Zhang^{I, II}; Qingyang Xu^{I, II}; Ning Chen^{I, II}

^ICollege of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin, P.R. China

^IIKey Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Education Ministry, Tianjin, P.R. China

^IIIChina Biothech Fermentation Industry Association, Beijing, P.R. China

^{Correspondence}

ABSTRACT

L-lactate is one of main byproducts excreted in to the fermentation medium. To improve L-glutamate production and reduce L-lactate accumulation, L-lactate dehydrogenase-encoding gene ldhA was knocked out from L-glutamate producing strain Corynebacterium glutamicum GDK-9, designated GDK-9ΔldhA. GDK-9ΔldhA produced approximately 10.1% more L-glutamate than the GDK-9, and yielded lower levels of such by-products as α-ketoglutarate, L-lactate and L-alanine. Since dissolved oxygen (DO) is one of main factors affecting L-lactate formation during L-glutamate fermentation, we investigated the effect of ldhA deletion from GDK-9 under different DO conditions. Under both oxygen-deficient and high oxygen conditions, L-glutamate production by GDK-9ΔldhA was not higher than that of the GDK-9. However, under micro-aerobic conditions, GDK-9ΔldhA exhibited 11.61% higher L-glutamate and 58.50% lower L-alanine production than GDK-9. Taken together, it is demonstrated that deletion of ldhA can enhance L-glutamate production and lower the unwanted by-products concentration, especially under micro-aerobic conditions.

Key words: Corynebacterium glutamicum, L-glutamate, L-lactate dehydrogenase, gene knockout, fermentation.

Introduction

L-glutamate, a widely-used flavoring agent throughout the world and a starting material for the synthesis of various chemicals, is predominately produced by Corynebacterium glutamicum (Calik et al., 2001). The current annual production of L-glutamate is approximately 2 500 000 tons with large increases each year. To date, several major strategies have been discovered that can induce L-glutamate overproduction, including biotin limitation, addition of antibiotics, surfactants, detergents, or cerulenin, and temperature triggering. The L-glutamate producers are characterized by a low pentose phosphate pathway flux and low conversion of α-ketoglutarate to oxaloacetate in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, likely due to low activity of the α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (Stansen et al., 2005).

In C. glutamicum, pyruvate is a branch point of glucose catabolism, since it is the portal to several metabolic pathways (Chen et al., 2009). Significantly, pyruvate can enter the TCA cycle in two ways: by condensation with CO₂ to form a dicarboxylic acid, or by oxidative decarboxylation to acetyl CoA. In addition, pyruvate can be consumed in other reactions, including L-lactate and L-alanine synthesis by Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and transaminase (AlaT), respectively. Although the theoretical yield of L-glutamate from glucose is 81.74% (w/w), the actual yield is much lower, due to high biomass and synthesis of by-products (Takac et al., 1998).

Oxygen supply is known to largely affect aerobic amino acid production by microorganisms, because aerobic microorganisms generally require sufficient oxygen concentrations to re-oxidize NAD (P)H₂ or FADH₂ and thereby generate adequate ATP for metabolism (Akashi et al., 1979). The dissolved oxygen (DO) levels largely determine the interactions between metabolic reactions and genetic regulatory mechanisms, as well as product and by-products formation during L-glutamate fermentation. For example, in addition to growth rate and protein synthesis, nutrient consumption and waste production rate are sensitive to DO levels (Zupke et al., 1995). The aerobic amino acid producing bacterium C. glutamicum accumulates lactate, succinate and acetate under oxygen-limited growth conditions (Dominguez et al., 1993; Toyoda et al., 2009).

In the L-glutamate fermentation process, due to the rapid growth and high cellular metabolism requirements of the bacteria, the oxygen supply is frequently insufficient and leads to L-lactate accumulation, which inhibits L-glutamate production. To meet the sufficient oxygen demand, the agitation rate in fermentation reactors is constantly increased during the glutamate production phase, adding cost to the already high-energy-consuming production process. To resolve this problem, we knocked out the L-lactic dehydrogenase encoding gene ldhA from the L-glutamate-producing strain C. glutamicum GDK-9 (GDK-9). Here we investigate the effect of ldhA gene deletion on the physiological characteristics and L-glutamate production of GDK-9.

Materials and Methods

Strains, plasmids, media and cultivation

All strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli was grown in LB medium at 37 °C, C. glutamicum was grown in BHI medium (Keihauer et al., 1993) at 32 °C. The seed medium comprised glucose (25 g L^-1), KH₂PO₄ (2.2 g L^-1), MgSO₄ (0.9 g L^-1), corn steep liquor (30 mL L^-1), soybean hydrolysate (20 mL L^-1) and urea (3 g L^-1). The production medium comprised glucose (80 g L^-1), KH₂PO₄ (2.0 g L^-1), MgSO₄7H₂O (1.8 g L^-1), MnSO₄H₂O (2.33 mg L^-1), FeSO₄7H₂O (2.33 mg L^-1), VB₁ (0.233 mg L^-1), corn steep liquor (5 mL L^-1) and soybean hydrolysate (10 mL L^-1).

Construction of recombinant plasmids

Plasmid for gene disruption in C. glutamicum was derived from pK18mobsacB. Upstream (ldhAI) and downstream (ldhAII) sequences of ldhA were PCR-amplified from the genomic DNA of the L-glutamate-producing strain using the primer sets ldhA717-1 (5'-ATCGGAATTCAGGTGCCGACA CTAATGC-3') plus ldhA717-2 (5'-ACCGACGGTTTCTTTCATTTTCGATCCCACTTCCTGATTTC CC-3'), and ldhA600-1 (5'-ATCGAAAATGAAAGAAACCGTCGGTAACTTTTTGGTTTACGGGC -3') plus ldhA600-2 (5'-TCGAAGCTTGCTTCCAGACGGTTTCATC-3'), respectively. Splicing by overlap extension was used to fuse upstream ldhAI and downstream ldhAII using the primer pair ldhA717-1 and ldhA600-2. The resulting fragment was digested by Hind III and EcoR I, cloned into vector pK18mobsacB and transformed into E.coli DH5αMCR. Transformants were selected on LB agar containing 50 µg mL^-1 kanamycin. The resulting recombinant vector pK18mobsacBΔldhA was verified by DNA sequencing. The construction process of recombinant plasmid was showed in Figure 1.

Construction of the recombinant strains

The resulting plasmid pK18mobsacBΔldhA was isolated from E. coli DH5αMCR and electroporated into GDK-9 (Van der Rest et al., 1999; Schäfer et al., 1994). The intact chromosomal ldhA was replaced by the truncated ΔldhA gene via homologous recombination (double crossover). Because the plasmid pK18mobsacB cannot duplicate in C. glutamicum, the recombinant strain alone could survive on the kanamycin-containing medium. The recombinants were picked up from the Petri dish and cultured in BHIS liquid nutrient medium for 14 h. Following incubation, the strain was spread onto BHIS solid nutrient supplemented with 10% sucrose. SacB gene from Bacillus subtilis encodes the enzyme levansucrase, which catalyzes sucrose hydrolysis and levan synthesis. C. glutamicum strains possessing a sacB gene is lethal in the presence of sucrose probably due to too much levan accumulating in periplasm of cells. (Jäger et al., 1992). And therefore only the double crossover homologous recombinants could survive on the sucrose-contaning medium. From these survivors, the ldhA gene knockout recombinant GDK-9ΔldhA was isolated using primer pairs ldhA713-1 plus ldhA600-2 and upldh (5'-CAGGAGATGTTGGAGTTG-3') plus dpldh (5'-TTGAAGCGTTCCATCTCG-3').

Fermentations

For shake flask experiments, 30 mL culture broth in a 500 mL baffled flask was cultivated at 200 rpm for 30 h. When the initial glucose was depleted, the 500 g L^-1 glucose solution was fed into the shake flask to keep the glucose concentration approximately at 20 g L^-1. The pH was maintained at 7.0 and controlled by the addition of 25.0% NH₄OH.

For L-glutamate fermentation, a 5-l bioreactor (Shanghai Baoxing Bio-engineering Equipment co, Ltd) with an operating volume of 3l was used as fermenter. The seed cultures were grown for 8 h in shake-flasks (100 mL seed medium inoculated into a 1-l shake-flask, 200 rpm, 32 °C) to reach an OD₆₀₀ about 12.0-16.0. Mature cultures were transferred to 3-l production medium for L-glutamate production (inoculum size 10% v/v), and cultivated for 24 h. During the whole process, glucose concentration was maintained at approximately 20 g L^-1 by adding 900 g L^-1 glucose solution and the glucose feeding rate was adjusted according to glucose consumption rate of each hour. The pH was maintained at 7.0 and controlled by the addition of 25.0% NH₄OH. DO concentration was maintained at 20% during the growth phase and was turned to 10% during glutamate-producing period. For assay of effect of DO on L-glutamate production by GDK-9Δldh , DO was adjusted as required by setting the agitation speed to a specified value (within the range 300 to 900 rpm) during glutamate-producing period.

Analysis methods

During the fermentation process, 1 mL samples were taken from the cultures and centrifuged at 4 °C and 13,000 rpm for 5 min. For biomass assay, dry cell weight was determined gravimetrically. Glucose concentration was determined with a biosensor (Institute of Biology, Shandong Academy of Science). Amino acids were analyzed as 2, 4-fluoro-dinitrobenzene derivatives using high-performance liquid chromatography. Metabolites were detected by analytical methods as described previously (Kelle et al., 1996). Organic acids were screened by HPLC and an UV detector at 215 nm (HPLC, Series 1100, Agilent Technologies, USA, XDB-C8 column). HPLC was undertaken at 25 °C and pH 3.0, with 100 mM L^-1 KH₂PO₄ solution as mobile phase.

Enzymatic assay for L-lactate dehydrogenase

Bacterial cells were harvested and re-suspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) supplemented with 10 mM MgCl₂, and grown to 20 OD₆₀₀ units. Cells were disrupted by sonication at 400 W for 10 min with 3 s pulse and 2 s pulse-off cycling (JY92-2D, SEIENTZ, Ningbo, China), followed by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 15 min. The resulting supernatant was used as the cyto-soluble fraction. Total protein concentration in cell extracts was measured by Lowry's method (Sigma Kit) using bovine serum albumin as standard. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay was performed as previously described (Inui et al., 2004).

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data were averaged and presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test were used to determine significant differences. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results

Effect of ldhA gene deletion on L-glutamate production by GDK-9 in shake flask cultures

To investigate the effect of ldhA deletion on L-glutamate production by the L-glutamate- producing GDK-9, the gene was knocked out from the bacterium. Successful ldhA deletion was validated by PCR and sequencing (data not shown). Moreover, measured enzymatic activity of LDH was 1.5 U mg protein^-1 in cell extract of the GDK-9, and negligible in GDK-9Δldh (Table 2). These results further verified that the ldhA gene had been successfully knocked out in GDK-9ΔldhA.

Next, levels of L-glutamate, L-lactate and L-alanine produced by the ldhA-knockout strain GDK-9ΔldhA in shake flask (Table 2) were measured. Both strains yielded approximately the same biomass; however, L-glutamate production reached 70.4 ± 1.33 g L^-1 by GDK-9ΔldhA, 9.15% more than that attained by the GDK-9 (64.5 ± 1.91 g L^-1) at 2630 h. Moreover, the deletion of ldhA resulted in a 97.6% and 44.6% decrease in L-lactate and L-alanine relative to the GDK-9, respectively. These data show that ldhA gene deletion markedly improved L-glutamate production in GDK-9 and dramatically lower by-products formation.

Effect of ldhA gene deletion on L-glutamate production by GDK-9 in fermenters

To further examine the impact of the ldhA deletion on L-glutamate production, we carried out 5-l feed-batch fermentations using GDK-9 and GDK-9Δldh. Biomass, glucose concentration, and L-glutamate productions as functions of incubation time are presented in Figure 2. In early-stage cultures, the biomass of GDK-9Δldh was slightly lower than that of the GDK-9. However, as the incubation time increased, both strains yielded similar biomass, indicating that ldhA deletion did not adversely affect the growth of the bacteria. In addition, the glucose consumption rate of GDK-9Δldh was slower than that of the GDK-9 during the growth phase, although this situation reversed when entering the stabilization growth phase. Despite these differences, the final L-glutamate titer reached 120 g L^-1 by GDK-9Δldh, 10.1% more than that of by GDK-9 (109 g L^-1) after 24 h of culture.

Excretion of byproducts during fermentations

During L-glutamate fermentation process, L-lactic acid, L-alanine and α-ketoglutarate are the most common byproducts excreted into the medium (Jojima et al., 2010). To investigate the effect of ldhA deletion on by-product production, concentrations of these three by-products were measured at the end of the fermentation process. As shown in Table 3, levels of L-lactic acid, L-alanine and α-ketoglutarate secreted by GDK-9Δldh were dramatically reduced relative to the wild-type (97.1%, 50.91% and 20.45% reduction, respectively).

Effect of the ldhA gene deletion on L-glutamate production by the GDK-9 under different DO conditions

DO play an important role in L-glutamate production as well as by-products accumulation (Calik et al., 2001). To study the differences in performance between the ldhA knockout strain and GDK-9 exposed to different DO levels, 5-l fed-batch L-glutamate fermentations was performed under oxygen-deficient conditions (DO = 0%), micro-aerobic conditions (DO = 10%) and high oxygen conditions (DO = 30%) imposed at the L-glutamate production phase.

As shown in Figure 3, the biomass of both strains under oxygen-deficient conditions was slightly lower than that obtained under micro-aerobic and high oxygen conditions. Oxygen-deprived GDK-9Δldh produced 4.04% more L-glutamate but 53.26% more L-alanine than GDK-9. While under micro-aerobic conditions, GDK-9Δldh produced 11.6% more L-glutamate and 58.5% less L-alanine than the GDK-9. However, under the high-oxygen condition, GDK-9Δldh produced approximately 43.23% less L-alanine than the GDK-9, and produced similar amount of L-glutamate which is much lower than that produced under oxygen-deficient and micro-aerobic conditions. Collectively, these results show that deleting the ldhA gene has little effect on L-glutamate production under oxygen-deficient and high oxygen conditions, but exerts a pronounced effect under micro-aerobic conditions.

Discussion

From detailed studies of branched pyruvate metabolism, by-products have been pinpointed as the bottleneck for L-glutamate production in a high-yield strain (Uy et al., 2003). And it is suggested that molecular genetic manipulation and fermentation optimization are viable approaches to increasing the L-glutamate yield (Ikeda, 2003; Kirchnera et al., 2003). L-lactate and L-alanine are common by-products of glutamate production (Marienhagen et al., 2005). Minimizing the formation of such by-products is desirable in industrial-scale production of L-glutamate (Amin et al., 1993).

To enhance L-glutamate production, we here proposed to eliminate concurrent L-lactate formation by deleting the ldhA gene encoding the NAD-dependent LDH enzyme, which is the sole L-lactate generating enzyme in C. glutamicum (Stansen et al., 2005). In this study, the ldhA gene was deleted from the L-glutamate-producing strain GDK-9. The GDK-9Δldh produced more L-glutamate than the GDK-9 in shake-flask cultures, probably because this strain secreted less L-lactate (Table 2) and more metabolic flux was drawn to L-glutamate synthesis. As shown in Figure 2, the GDK-9Δldh produced 10.1% more L-glutamate than the GDK-9 in 5-l fed-batch fermentation studies, although the final biomass of the two strains was similar. Generally, a metabolically engineered microbe has a reduced growth rate compared to its parental strain (Jung et al., 2012). Studies report that ldhA deletion in severals microbes reduced cell growth (Yang et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2009; Fiedler et al., 2011). Although the biomass of GDK-9Δldh was slightly lower than that of the GDK-9 in early-stage cultures, both strains yielded similar biomass as the incubation time increased, indicating that ldhA deletion did not adversely affect the bacterial growth. However, the glucose consumption rate of the GDK-9ΔldhA was slightly slower than GDK-9 during the period of 2-6 h, which may be probably due to two reasons: on one hand, the biomass of GDK-9ΔldhA was smaller but both strains accumulated similar amount of glutamate in that period, thus less glucose was consumed; and on the other hand, metabolic flux from pyruvate to lactate was cut and therefore glucose wasted on lactate synthesis was prevented.

Throughout the fermentations, the main by-products excreted into the medium were L-lactic, L-alanine and α-ketoglutarate. Compared with the GDK-9, the GDK-9ΔldhA yielded lower levels of by-products (Tables 2 and 3). One possible explanation is that, in the GDK-9ΔldhA, more pyruvate was fluxed to the TCA cycle for L-glutamate biosynthesis, leaving less carbon source for byproduct conversion.

The DO concentration has been shown to affect final L-glutamate production and the composition of extracellular amino acids produced (Zupke et al., 1995). In this study, the ldhA deletion strain accumulated more L-alanine instead of L-lactate than the GDK-9 under oxygen-deficient conditions. A possible explanation is that oxygen deprivation inhibits the TCA pathway (Cocaign-Bousquet et al., 1995). In this situation, pyruvate would accumulate, along with its derivatives L-alanine, L-lactate and ethanol. And the deletion of the ldhA gene from GDK-9 favors L-alanine accumulation. Here, we observed that deleting the ldhA gene produced no obvious positive effect on L-glutamate production, possibly because the accumulated L-alanine inhibits L-glutamate synthesis under oxygen-deficient conditions (Dominguez et al., 1993). We further demonstrated that L-alanine accumulation is reduced in GDK-9Δldh relative to GDK-9 under micro-aerobic and high dissolved oxygen conditions.

It is reported that higher DO can strengthen TCA cycles but reduces activities of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase and glutamate dehydrogenase, and thus carbon-fixation (supplying oxaloacetate to the TCA cycle) and glutamate synthesis were weaken (Gao et al., 2005; Yamamoto et al., 2011). And therefore L-glutamate concentration was higher under micro-aerobic conditions than under high aerobic conditions. Moreover, pyruvate carboxylase (PC) as another enzyme involved in oxaloacetate synthesis need biotin as its coenzyme. Hasegawa (2008) reported that PC activity under a biotin-limited condition was ~20% of that under the condition with sufficient biotin. GDK-9 is a biotin-auxotroph strain and strategy used for this strain to trigger L-glutamate production is biotin limitation. As Figure 3 showed biomass of GDK-9 strains under high aerobic condition is higher and so more biotin was consumed than that under microaerobic condition and thus less PC activity was left. This is maybe another reason for the higher L-glutamate production under micro-aerobic conditions. These results indicate that the ldhA mutant enhances L-glutamate production most effectively under micro-aerobic conditions.

It has been reported that increasing the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase by over-expressing the respective genes or by introducing alleles for deregulated pyruvate dehydrogenase might improve L-glutamate production, and the reduced pyruvate dehydrogenase activity observed during L-glutamate production is purportedly responsible for by-product formation (Uy et al., 2003). Consequently, to further improve the already relatively efficient L-glutamate production in GDK-9, enhancing the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase presents as a viable approach. Other promising approaches are optimization of fermentation technique and metabolic engineering. We have consolidated the validity of the latter approach in the results presented here.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support from Jingbo Liang and Chunqian Guo. This work was supported by National Key Technology Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAC11B03), National High Technology Research and Development Program (2012AA02A703, 2013AA102106), Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant No. 12ZCZDSY01900), and Program for Chang jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1166).

Submitted: March 5, 2013

Approved: March 14, 2014

All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.

• Akashi K, Shibai H, Hirose Y (1979) Effect of oxygen on L-phenylalanine, L-proline, L-glutamine and L-arginine fermentations. J Ferment Technol 57:317-320.
• Amin G, Shahaby AF, Allah Khalaf, A.M (1993) Glutamic acid and by-product synthesis by immobilized cells of the bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum Biotechnol Lett 15:1123-1128.
• Calik G, Unlutabak F, Ozdamar TH (2001) Product and by-product distributions in glutamic acid fermentation by Brevibacterium flavum: effects of the oxygen transfer. Biochem Eng J 9:91-101.
• Cocaign-Bousquet M, Lindley ND (1995) Pyruvate overflow and carbon flux within the central metabolic pathways of Corynebacterium glutamicum during growth on lactate. Enzyme Microb Tech 17:260-267.
• Dominguez H, Nezondet C, Lindley ND, Cocaign M (1993) Modified carbon flux during oxygen limited growth of Corynebacterium glutamicum and the consequences for amino acid overproduction. Biotechnol Lett 15:449-454.
• Fiedler T, Bekker M, Jonsson M, Mehmeti I, Pritzschke A, Siemens N, Nes I, Hugenholtz J, Kreikemeyer B (2011) Characterization of three lactic acid bacteria and their isogenic ldh deletion mutants shows optimization for YATP (cell mass produced per mole of ATP) at their physiological pHs. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:612-617.
• Gao P, Lu JB, Duan ZY, Mao ZG, Shi ZP (2005) Effects of dissolved oxygen on the key enzymes in glutamate fermentation. Food Fermn Ind 31:72-75.
• Grant SG, Jessee J, Bloom FR, Hanahan D (1990) Differential plasmid rescue from transgenic mouse DNAs into Escherichia coli methylation-restriction mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 4645-4649.
• Hasegawa T, Hashimoto K, Kawasaki H, NakamatsuT (2008) Changes in enzyme activities at the pyruvate node in glutamate-overproducing Corynebacterium glutamicum J Biosci Bioeng 105:12-19.
• Ikeda M (2003) Amino acid production processes. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 79:1-35.
• Inui M, Murakami S, Okino S, Kawaguchi H, Vertès A, Yukawa H (2004) Metabolic analysis of Corynebacterium glutamicum during lactate and succinate productions under oxygen deprivation conditions. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 7:182-196.
• Jäger W, Schäfer A, Pühler A, Labes G, Wohlleben W (1992) Expression of the Bacillus subtilis sacB gene leads to sucrose sensitivity in the gram-positive bacterium Corynebactenium glutamicum but not in Streptomyces lividans J Bacteriol 174:5462-5465.
• Jojima T, Fujii M, Mori E, Inui M, Yukawa H (2010) Engineering of sugar metabolism of Corynebacterium glutamicum for production of amino acid L-alanine under oxygen deprivation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol 87:159-165.
• Jung MY, Ng CY, Song H, Lee J, Oh MK (2012) Deletion of lactate dehydrogenase in Enterobacter aerogenes to enhance 2, 3-butanediol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:461-469.
• Keilhauer C, Eggeling L, Sahm H (1993). Isoleucine synthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum: molecular analysis of the ilvB-ilvN-ilvC operon. J Bacteriol 175:5595-5603.
• Kelle R, Hermann T, Weuster-Botz D, Eggeling L, Kramer R, Wandrey C (1996) Glucose-controlled L-isoleucine fed-batch production with recombinant strains of Corynebacterium glutamicum J Biotechnol 50:123-136.
• Kirchnera O, Tauchb A (2003) Tools for genetic engineering in the amino acid-producing bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum J Biotechnol 104:287-299.
• Marienhagen J, Kennerknecht N, Sahm H, Eggeling L (2005) Functional analysis of all aminotransferase proteins inferred from the genome sequence of Corynebacterium glutamicum J Bacteriol 187: 7639-7646.
• Chen N, Du J, Liu H, Xu Q (2009) Elementary mode analysis and metabolic flux analysis of L-glutamate biosynthesis by Corynebacterium glutamicum Ann Microbiol 59:317-322.
• Peters-Wendisch PG, Schiel B, Wendisch VF, Katsoulidis E, Mockel B, Sahm H, Eikmanns BJ (2001) Pyruvate carboxylase is a major bottleneck for glutamate and lysine production by Corynebacterium glutamicum J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 3:295-300.
• Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A (1994) Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum Gene 145:69-73.
• Stansen C, Uy D, Delaunay S, Eggeling L, Goergen J, Wendisch, VF (2005) Characterization of a Corynebacterium glutamicum lactate utilization operon induced during temperature-triggered glutamate production. Appl Environ Microb 71:5920-5928.
• Takac S, Calik G, Mavituna F, Dervakos G (1998) Metabolic flux distribution for the optimized production of L-glutamate. Enzyme Microbial Technol 23:286-300.
• Toyoda K, Teramoto H, Inui Masayuki, Yukawa H (2009) Molecular mechanism of SugR-mediated sugar-dependent expression of the ldhA gene encoding L-lactate dehydrogenase in Corynebacterium glutamicum Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83:315-327.
• Uy D, Delaunay S, Germain P, Engasser JM, Goergen JL (2003) Instability of glutamate production by Corynebacterium glutamicum 2262 in continuous culture using the temperature-triggered process. J. Biotechnol 104:173-184.
• Van der Rest ME, Lange C, Molenaar D (1999) A heat shock following electro-poration induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52:541-545.
• Yang YT, San KY, Bennett GN (1999) Redistribution of metabolic fluxes in Escherichia coli with fermentative lactate dehydrogenase overexpressionand deletion. Metab Eng 1:141-152.
• Yamamoto S, Sakai M, Inui M, Yukawa H (2011) Diversity of metabolic shift in response to oxygen deprivation in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its closerelatives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1051-1061.
• Zupke C, Sinskey AJ, Stephanopoulos G (1995) Intracellular flux analysis applied to the effect of dissolved oxygen on hybridomas. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 44: 27-36.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  13 Feb 2015
• Date of issue
  Dec 2014

History

• Accepted
  14 Mar 2014
• Received
  05 Mar 2013