Double mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for enhanced β-D-fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase productivity and application of growth kinetics for parametric significance analysis

Abstract

The kinetics of an extracellular β-D-fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a chemically defined medium, i.e., sucrose peptone agar yeast extract at pH 6, was investigated. The wild-type was treated with a chemical mutagen, methyl methane sulfonate. Among the six mutants isolated, methyl methane sulfonate-V was found to be a better enzyme producing strain (52 ± 2.4^a U/mL). The maximum production (74 ± 3.1^a U/mL) was accomplished after at 48 h (68 ± 2.7^a mg/mL protein). The mutants were stabilized at low levels of 5-fluoro-cytocine and the viable ones were further processed for optimization of cultural conditions and nutritional requirements. The sucrose concentration, incubation period and pH were optimized to be 30 g/L, 28 °C, and 6.5, respectively. The methyl methane sulfonate-V exhibited an improvement of over 10 folds in enzyme production when 5 g/L ammonium sulfate was used as a nitrogen source. Thin layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis illustrated the optimal enzyme activity supported by the higher rate of hydrolysis of sucrose into monosaccharides, particularly α-D-glucose and β-D-fructose. The values for Q_p (2 ± 0.12^c U/mL/h) and Y_p/s (4 ± 1.24^b U/g) of the mutant were considerably increased in comparison with other yeast strains (both isolates and viable mutants). The mutant could be exploited for enzyme production over a wider temperature range (26–34 °C), with significantly high enzyme activity (LSD 0.048, HS) at the optimal temperature.

Keywords
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; β-d-Fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase; Kinetics and thermodynamics; Entropy and enthalpy

Introduction

The enzyme β-D-fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase (FFH, EC 3.2.1.26) cleaves α-1,4 glycosidic linkage between α-D-glucose and β-D-fructose moiety in sucrose to release monosaccharide units by hydrolysis. It has industrial applications particularly soft-centre confectionary production and the fermentation of cane molasses into ethanol.¹ Although Saccharomyces cerevisiae, because of its typical higher sucrose fermenting ability, has been a preferred organism for synthesis of FFH, the pursuit for future strain selection is based on factors including strain stability, yield, initial pH, and fermentation period. Other factors notably temperature tolerance, oxygen supply, and shear stress are also worth-mentioning.^2,3 Sucrose has been a useful carbon source for enzyme synthesis. Glucose availability for under-cultivation yeast cultures is largely dependent on efficient hydrolysis of sucrose. The optimization of nature and type of potential sources could provide in-house basis for an efficient batch-culture process.⁴ The fermentation efficiency of yeast strains at relatively higher incubation temperature (>35 °C) remains low because of the increased membrane fluidity that changes the type, chain length and composition of fatty acids. Growth temperature rise generally supports the biosynthesis of some heat-shock proteins that are implicated in thermal cross tolerance of different organisms, prominently non-filamentous fungi like yeasts.^5,6

In the past, only few studies have revealed the mechanics of catabolic repression. Although enzyme expression is regulated in various yeast cultures, a hyper-producing viable strain with consistent activity is not developed.⁷ The classical strain improvement methods like ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and use of alkylating agents such as N-nitroso guanidine (NG) to obtain positive mutants with high enzyme productivity have demonstrated some success. The selection and screening of better survivors have also been found critical.⁸ More work is required to increase enzyme activity by an economical batch process. The use of mild chemical mutagens like methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) to increase frequency of mutation has not been studied in detail. Therefore, efforts are still needed to develop a yeast mutant with improved substrate utilization and rate of enzyme biosynthesis. In this study, we assessed a wild-type of S. cerevisiae IIB-IX for improved FFH enzyme production after randomly induced mutagenesis. The activation enthalpy and entropy for FFH activity and its inactivation were analyzed for understanding of the growth kinetics. The idea involved in enzyme production and subsequent thermal activation of the system was also focussed.

Materials and methods

Organism, chemically-induced mutagenesis and culture maintenance

S. cerevisiae strain, IIB-IX, isolated from soil was treated with MMS to induce mutagenesis. Five millilitre of the mutagen (concentration: 50–300 µg/mL) was added to the centrifuge tubes containing 5 mL of the yeast cell suspension. The tubes were placed at an ambient temperature (25 °C) for different intervals (ranging from 15 to 90 min). This suspension was centrifuged at 5500 × g for 20 min. The supernatant containing mutagen was carefully decanted and then 6 mL of sterile saline water containing NaCl 0.085%, yeast extract 0.05%, and polypeptone 0.025% was dispensed in all tubes containing cell pellet as reported by Das and Nandi.⁹ The suspension (0.1 mL) was spread on the petri-plates containing 10 g/L sucrose, 15 g/L agar, 2.5 g/L peptone, and 2 g/L yeast extract with pH 6 (also known as SAPY medium). Bromocresol green dye (40 mL/L of 3% dye in 70% ethanol) was then added and kept at 30 °C. The yeast colonies, bearing pink colour zones, appeared in 24–36 h, exhibited sucrose hydrolysis. These were compared with the control plates containing wild-type S. cerevisiae prepared in parallel. Later, the colonies were aseptically picked and inoculated to the agar slopes of the same medium. The chemicals and reagents used were procured from Sigma Chemicals, Inc. (USA).

Induction of 5-fluoro-cytocine resistance in viable mutant strains

The treated cells of selected mutant were collected during the log phase. The cells were washed twice with sterile distilled water before plating on the SAPY medium. Different amounts of 5-fluoro-cytocine (0.01–0.1 mg/mL) were added before the incubation. However, sucrose was replaced with fructose.¹⁰ The plates were incubated for 16–24 h, and frequently sub-cultured. The vigorous growth of the yeast mutants was checked for stability during batch culture. The samples were collected periodically during inoculation and plated on the medium containing 5-fluoro-cytocine to select resistant strains. The resistant mutant cultures were screened and preserved in paraffin oil at 4 °C.

Inoculum preparation

The inoculum was prepared with 50 mL of SAPY medium (without agar) using 250 mL sterile Erlenmeyer flasks. The medium was sterilized at 15 psi (121 °C) for 15 min and seeded with a loopful of the yeast cells. The culture medium was incubated in a rotary shaking incubator (4043-Gallenkamp-JB, London, UK) at 28 °C for 16–24 h (160 rpm). The suspension was containing 1.25 × 10⁷ CFU/mL after hemocytometer count (OD_590nm ∼ 1).

Fermentation procedure

The FFH enzyme production was carried out under shaking culture using 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks. The SAPY medium (without agar) at pH 6 was added to the sterile, cotton-plugged flasks and sterilized in an autoclave. After cooling to about 20 °C, 1 mL of the cell suspension was aseptically seeded into each flask containing the sterile medium. The flasks were incubated in a rotary shaker at 200 rpm at 30 °C for 48 h. The batch-cultures were grown parallel in triplicates.

Analysis of biomass development and sugar consumption

The dry biomass of selected yeast culture was determined after centrifugation at 6250 × g, and then by transferring the broth in pre-weighed tubes at 20 °C. The tubes were oven dried at 105 °C for 2 h. The residual sugar was assayed by dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method¹¹ at 546 nm wavelength using a UV/Vis scanning spectrophotometer (MVP153-CECIL-700, London, England).

FFH assay

The enzyme activity was determined following the procedure described by Myers et al.¹² “One FFH unit is defined as the amount of enzyme, which releases 1 µmol of inverted sugar in 1 min at 20 °C, and pH 4.5". The tubes having 2.5 mL of acetate buffer at pH 5.5 (50 mM) along with 0.1 mL of sucrose (300 mM) were allowed to pre-incubate at 32 °C for a period of 5 min. Then 0.1 mL of an appropriately diluted enzyme mixture was added and incubated for another 5 min. Later, the assay mixture was kept in a water bath at 90 °C for 5 min and cooled at room temperature. The tube containing similar ingredients plus distilled water without enzyme was used as control. One millilitre of DNS reagent was dispensed into 1 mL of the mixture. The tubes were again placed in boiling water for 5 min. After cooling the reaction mixture to about 25 °C, the final volume was adjusted to 10 mL with distilled water. The percentage transmittance was measured at 546 nm. The total protein content was measured using Bradford method.¹³

Chromatographic analysis of enzyme preparation

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was employed for the qualitative analysis of FFH hydrolysis products. The pre-coated TLC plates (E-Merck) were allowed to spot the enzyme samples; n = 2 per sample. The plates were developed in acetone: diethyl ether: water (7:3:1 by volume). The plates were sprayed thoroughly with 0.2% ninhydrin and allowed to dry at 70 °C for 20 min.¹⁴ The resulting sugars were quantitatively analyzed by a double beam HPLC (Perkins Elmer, USA). The universal column (C18, HPX-87H ion exchange, 400 mm × 118 mm) was maintained at 25 °C. The mobile phase (ethanol–butanol, 2:1) was set at a flow-rate of 0.42 mL/min. The samples were identified using a refractive index detector (Turbochron-4 software).

Kinetic study

The kinetic parameters were computed following the procedures described by Pirt.¹⁵ The volumetric rate for FFH production (Q_p) was calculated from the plot between enzyme (U/mL) and also calculated ΔT (h), the product yield coefficient (Y_p/s) from dP/dS, the specific product yield coefficient (Y_p/x, U/g cells) from dP/dX and the specific rate for product formation (q_P) from Y_p/x × µ. The specific growth rate ( µ) was determined from the slope between ln X/X₀ (X = cell mass, g/L) and ΔT (h). The growth yield coefficient (Y_x/s) was calculated as g cells formed/g [S] utilized. The cell biomass formation (Q_x, g X/l/h), and substrate consumption rates were determined from g dry weight of yeast cells or [S]/L vs. ΔT (h).

Statistical analysis

The treatment effects were compared following the procedure of Snedecor and Cochran.¹⁶ The significance is presented as Duncan's multiples as probability ( ≤p>) values of the process parameters.

Results and discussion

In this study, wild-type S. cerevisiae IIB-IX was mutated by treating it with a potent chemical mutagen, MMS. The mutant variant MMS-V was found to be a better FFH yielding strain (52 ± 2.4 U/mL) when compared with the wild-type (17 ± 1.8 U/mL). This mutant was grown on the medium containing low fluorocytocine levels. The stability of FFH production was monitored at various levels. High FFH producing colonies were isolated at 0.02 mg/mL of MMS; however, the potential cultures lost their stability after approximately two weeks similar to that report by Fernandez et al.¹⁷ This instability may be due to the possible development of resistance in growing yeast cells. Only few unstable mutants thrived for several generations. To eliminate this problem, these mutant strains were cultured in the medium containing optimal concentration as 0.05 mg/mL of MMS, in which MMS-V gave consistent FFH production. The selected mutant revealed more than average growth yield coefficients, and lower specific growth rate. IIB-IX (wild-type) and the chemically derepressed mutant (MMS-V) were compared over a period (Figs. 1–3). Both the cultures showed a general growth pattern as revealed by biomass level. MMS-V exhibited much faster growth rate as compared with wild-type IIB-IX. The optimum sugar consumption was recorded at 22.31 ± 1.12 g/L by MMS-V in comparison with 16 ± 0.81 g/L by wild-type IIB-IX. A notable improvement in FFH production by mutant MMS-V than wild-type and all other mutants was observed. In a similar study by Weber and Roitsch¹⁸ yeast mutant showed two fold higher yield of FFH than the wild-type. During the course of incubation, the enzyme production started after a lag phase of approximately 8–12 h and peaked at the late log phase prior to the onset of stationary phase. The enzyme biosynthesis was decreased subsequently, probably due to the decreased nutrients availability and the enzyme catabolic repression. The enzyme expression in yeast is adversely affected by the availability of monosaccharides particularly glucose or fructose.¹⁹

Fig. 1
Comparison of biomass formation by wild-type (IIB-IX) and mutant (MMS-V) strains of S. cerevisiae in batch culture (IIB-IX – ●–, MMS-V – ○–). Sucrose concentration 30 g/L, temperature 28 °C, initial pH 6.5, agitation rate 200 rpm. Y-error bars indicate standard deviation among the three parallel replicates.

Fig. 2
Comparison of sugar consumption by wild-type (IIB-IX) and mutant (MMS-V) strains of S. cerevisiae in batch culture (IIB-IX – ●–, MMS-V – ○–). Temperature 28 °C, initial pH 6.5, agitation rate 200 rpm. Y-error bars indicate standard deviation among the three parallel replicates.

Fig. 3
Time of incubation of FFH production by wild-type (IIB-IX) and mutant (MMS-V) strains of S. cerevisiae in batch culture (IIB-IX – ○–, MMS-V – ○–). Sucrose concentration 30 g/L, temperature 28 °C, initial pH 6.5, agitation rate 200 rpm. Y-error bars indicate standard deviation among the three parallel replicates.

A comparison of FFH yield coefficients and productivity rates of wild-type IIB-IX and the mutant MMS-V during batch culture was made under different cultural conditions. The sugar concentration (25, 30, and 35 g/L), thermophilic tendencies (22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, and 36 °C) and preliminary pH (6, 6.5, and 7) were determined (Table 1). Maximum enzyme production (68 ± 2.5^a U/mL) was achieved at 30 g/L sucrose in 48 h by mutant MMS-V following incubation and subsequent growth. A higher than the optimal sucrose concentration caused an increase in the sugar consumption and so the dry biomass formation rate; however, there was no gross increase in the enzyme productivity. Among the diverse incubation temperatures, the best enzyme activity (70 ± 2.2^a U/mL) was observed at 28 °C, which was more than 3.5 fold higher compared to the wild-type culture. It was interesting that the mutant strain was quite capable of growing between 34 and 36 °C or even higher temperatures; however the enzyme activity decreased abruptly. While comparing pH values, the optimal enzyme synthesis by mutant MMS-V (74 ± 3.1^a U/mL) was recorded at an initial pH of 6.5. The wild-type was found to be less thermo-tolerant and it yielded FFH only during a narrow temperature range (30–32 °C), revealing no preference for the pH optima.

Table 1
Comparisons of yield coefficients for FFH production by wild-type and mutant cultures of S. cerevisiae.

Cultivation conditions	Mutant FFH production (U/mL)	Yield coefficients
		Product yield coefficients						Growth yield coefficients
		Yp / x (Enzyme units/g cells formed)			Yp / s (Enzyme units/g substrate utilized)			Yx / s (g cells formed/g substrate utilized)
		IIB-IX	MMS-V		IIB-IX	MMS-V		IIB-IX	MMS-V
Sugar conc. (g/L)
25	45 ± 1.6c	8 ± 1.1a	34 ± 2.1b		10 ± 0.2a	2 ± 1.1a		0.18 ± 0.02a	0.03 ± 0.01c
30	68 ± 2.5a	5 ± 1.5d	41 ± 2.3a		1 ± 0.1b	3 ± 1.3a		0.15 ± 0.03b	0.07 ± 0.01a
35	56 ± 2.1b	4 ± 0.7de	34 ± 3.5b		0.74 ± 0.2c	2 ± 0.4b		0.12 ± 0.02c	0.04 ± 0.02b
Incubation temp (°C)
22	23 ± 1.3fg	6 ± 1.7d	20 ± 1.6c		0.12 ± 0.2e	0.98 ± 0.2d		0.09 ± 0.02b	0.04 ± 0.02f
24	34 ± 2.2de	7 ± 1.6c	26 ± 2.5c		0.79 ± 0.1c	2 ± 0.4c		0.11 ± 0.01a	0.04 ± 0.01f
26	62 ± 3.4ab	7 ± 2.2b	34 ± 2.4b		1 ± 0.2b	2 ± 0.2b		0.13 ± 0.03a	0.05 ± 0.01e
28	70 ± 2.2a	9 ± 2.3a	45 ± 2.1a		1 ± 0.3a	3 ± 0.3a		0.14 ± 0.02a	0.06 ± 0.02d
30	68 ± 3.5ab	8 ± 1.8b	34 ± 2.1b		1 ± 0.1b	3 ± 0.9a		0.12 ± 0.03a	0.09 ± 0.01a
32	65 ± 2.6ab	8 ± 2.2b	27 ± 2.4c		1 ± 0.6b	2 ± 0.2a		0.11 ± 0.02a	0.08 ± 0.02b
34	61 ± 1.8ab	7 ± 2.4c	24 ± 3.2c		0 ± 0.3c	2 ± 0.5b		0.10 ± 0.01a	0.07 ± 0.01c
36	56 ± 2.4bc	6 ± 2.2d	21 ± 1.5c		0.13 ± 0.1e	1 ± 0.2c		0.08 ± 0.05b	0.03 ± 0.01g
Initial pH
6	66 ± 1.5ab	9 ± 2.4a	37 ± 1.2b		1 ± 0.4a	2 ± 1.2b		0.07 ± 0.02c	0.05 ± 0.01b
6.5	74 ± 3.1a	8 ± 2.3bc	46 ± 2.7a		0.92 ± 0.2b	3 ± 1.5a		0.09 ± 0.03b	0.08 ± 0.01a
7	62 ± 2.6ab	7 ± 1.1cd	45 ± 2.4a		0.75 ± 0.1c	3 ± 1.6a		0.14 ± 0.01a	0.04 ± 0.02c

• ± Indicates standard deviation among the three parallel replicates. The values designated by different letters in each set differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.

The sugar concentration, incubation temperature and initial pH directly affect the fungal growth and hence influence the secretion of primary or secondary metabolites. The hyper-secretive mutant MMS-V exhibited lower rates for biomass formation and much higher rates for sucrose fermentation ability compared with the wild-type culture. A greater than the optimal (30 g/L) inverted sucrose concentration in the production medium results in a faster glucose-induced repression of FFH.²⁰ The mutant MMS-V was quite capable of growing up to 36 °C (pH 6.5), a much higher temperature than its wild-type counter-part. The final pH and the enzyme production rate were found to be proportional. The possible reason for this liaison is that the FFH production complements secretion of various anions along with some basic proteins, or to the selective uptake of certain cations.^21,22 Although the wild-type IIB-IX achieved an upper value of Y_x/s (0.15 ± 0.03^b g yeast cells/g) than mutant MMS-V, the later demonstrated an improvement in the volumetric rate of product development. In addition to these findings, when the cultures were equated for specific rate constant, mutant MMS-V revealed much higher values of q_p (>15–20 fold improvement). It is noteworthy that mutant MMS-V showed several fold improved values of Q_p, Y_p/x, Y_p/s and q_p when compared with the wild-type culture (LSD 0.048).

The qualitative analysis through thin layer chromatography (TLC) confirmed production of sugars viz. α-D-glucose, β-D-fructose, and sucrose by FFH hydrolysis. Image 1 is one of the TLC chromatograms carried out to detect sugars (Fig. 4A). The spot analysis and comparison of the R_f values (relative front) confirmed the sugar hydrolysis when compared with their ultrapure sugar standards suggesting the complete (100%) separation as reported by Dastager et al.¹⁴ HPLC analysis depicted the separate and well-organized peaks for α-D-glucose, β-D-fructose and sucrose, thus highlighting the product stability in the mixture form (Fig. 4B). Raffinose and Stachyose were also secreted into the reaction broth but their highest productivities remained at 0.0112 and 0.0007 mg/mL, respectively.

Fig. 4
(A) Thin layer chromatography (TLC) for the separation of FFH hydrolysis sugars ( α-D-glucose, β-D-fructose, sucrose) in duplicate samples of the reaction broth at optimal conditions run with the standards. (B) HPLC chromatograph of FFH activity by mutant strain of S. cerevisiae MMS-V at optimal conditions (1. Raffinose, 2. Stachyose, 3. α-D-Glucose, 4. β-D-Fructose, 5. Sucrose).

The influence of culture conditions on product formation was computed by biomass formation, specific production rate, substrate conversion rate, synthetic activity and the product breakdown.^23,24 The values for Y_p/x (enzyme units/g cells formed) and Y_p/s (enzyme units/g substrate consumed) were found to be 45.49 ± 2.7^a U/g cells and 3 ± 1.5^a U/g substrate, respectively. Ammonium sulfate (5, 7.5 g/L) and tryptone (2.5, 5 g/L) were added solely into the culture medium (Table 2). The values for Y_p/s, Y_x/s, and Y_p/x at various ammonium sulfate concentrations were improved considerably (LSD 0.048, HS, p ≤ 0.05) as compared with the control (tryptone + yeast extract) or sole peptone supplementation. This steady increase could be attributed to ammonium sulfate which facilitates the release of periplasmic enzyme by permeabilization of the yeast cell walls as reported by Pirt.¹⁵ The volumetric rate (Q_x) was marginally different at 5–7.5 g/L ammonium sulfate in 48 h. Similar findings were reported by Pirt¹⁵ and Gomez et al.²⁵; however, FFH production in this study was more than 4.5 times higher than the previously reported. When the mutant strain MMS-V was compared for Q_p and q_s, significant enhancement (p ≤ 0.05) was noted at 5 g/L ammonium sulfate when compared with other ammonium sulfate concentrations or even other nitrogen sources.

Table 2
Comparison of kinetic parameters for FFH production by wild-type and mutant cultures of S. cerevisiae.

Kinetic parameters	Control			Ammonium sulfate (g/L)					Tryptone (g/L)
				5		7.5			2.5		5
	IIB-IX	MMS-V		IIB-IX	MMS-V	IIB-IX	MMS-V		IIB-IX	MMS-V	IIB-IX	MMS-V
Substrate consumption parameters
Yx / s (g cells/g)	0.12 ± 0.01a	0.07 ± 0.01a		0.12 ± 0.03a	0.08 ± 0.02a	0.16 ± 0.03a	0.21 ± 0.03a		0.13 ± 0.02a	0.10 ± 0.01a	0.12 ± 0.02a	0.11 ± 0.07a
Qs (g/L/h)	0.32 ± 0.05a	0.44 ± 0.03a		0.55 ± 0.05a	0.45 ± 0.02a	0.46 ± 0.02a	0.65 ± 0.04a		0.24 ± 0.02a	0.29 ± 0.02a	0.32 ± 0.02a	0.54 ± 0.03a
qs (g/g cells/h)	0.17 ± 0.02a	0.29 ± 0.04a		0.17 ± 0.04a	0.20 ± 0.05a	0.13 ± 0.02a	0.20 ± 0.02a		0.15 ± 0.01a	0.18 ± 0.03a	0.10 ± 0.02a	0.20 ± 0.02a
Qx (g cells/l/h)	0.05 ± 0.04a	0.04 ± 0.01a		0.08 ± 0.02a	0.06 ± 0.01a	0.11 ± 0.02a	0.08 ± 0.01a		0.09 ± 0.02a	0.06 ± 0.02a	0.06 ± 0.02a	0.04 ± 0.02a
Enzyme formation parameters
Qp (U/mL/h)	0.28 ± 0.05c	0.72 ± 0.01c		0.46 ± 0.05c	2 ± 0.12c	0.56 ± 0.02c	1 ± 0.22c		0.26 ± 0.03c	1 ± 0.42c	0.36 ± 0.01c	2 ± 0.045d
Yp / s (U/g)	0.67 ± 0.02b	2 ± 0.08b		1 ± 0.24b	3 ± 1.12b	1 ± 0.62b	4 ± 1.24b		0.71 ± 0.03b	3 ± 1.51b	0.91 ± 0.02b	3 ± 1.024b
Yp / x (U/g cells)	4 ± 0.17a	17 ± 2.4a		8 ± 1.11a	31 ± 4.32a	8 ± 2.82a	30 ± 3.31a		5 ± 1.55a	31 ± 1.62a	7 ± 1.85a	29 ± 2.22a
qp (U/g cells/h)	0.11 ± 0.02d	0.34 ± 0.26d		0.20 ± 0.01d	0.79 ± 0.35d	0.19 ± 0.01d	0.80 ± 0.02d		0.22 ± 0.02d	0.70 ± 0.12d	0.13 ± 0.02d	0.18 ± 0.02c
LSD	0.006	0.015		0.026	0.048	0.020	0.035		0.018	0.031	0.014	0.027
Significance level	–	–		–	HS	–	S		–	S	–	–

• ± Indicates standard deviation among replicates. LSD for least significant difference, HS denotes highly significant and S for significant values. The values designated by different letters in each set differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.

Conclusions

In the present study, a locally developed S. cerevisiae mutant (MMS-V) exhibited a substantial improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in FFH production when 5 g/L ammonium sulfate was added as an organic nitrogen ingredient directly into the SAPY medium at pH 6.5. Several folds improvement in volumetric enzyme productivity was recorded by the mutant at all the rates examined. The TLC and HPLC studies revealed that the enzyme produced by the mutant is active and efficient in hydrolysis of sucrose, which may be highly useful for inverted-syrup production at a larger-scale. The potential mutant could be exploited for enzyme production at a wider temperature range (26–34 °C).

• Associate Editor: Gisele Monteiro de Souza

Acknowledgements

Vice Chancellor, GC University Lahore is gratefully acknowledged for his excellent services to promote research culture at IIB and of the whole University.

References

• ¹
  Nakano H, Murakami H, Shizuma M, Kiso T, de Araujo TL, Kitahata S. Transfructosylation of thiol group bybeta-fructofuranosidases. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2000;64:1472-1476.
• ²
  Sánchez MP, Huidobro JF, Mato I, Muniategui S, Sancho MT Evolution of invertase activity in honey over two years. JAgric Food Chem 2001;49:416-422.
• ³
  Djegui KY, Gachomo EW, Hounhouigan DJ, Kayodé AP, Kotchoni SO. Biochemical characterization and growth patterns of new yeast isolates. Mol Biol Rep 2014;41:5199-5206.
• ⁴
  Iraqi D, Le VQ, Lamhamedi MS, Tremblay FM. Sucrose utilization during somatic embryo development in black spruce: involvement of apoplastic invertase in the tissue and of extracellular invertase in the medium. J Plant Physiol 2005;162:115-124.
• ⁵
  Silveira MC, Oliveira EM, Carvajal E, Bon EP. Nitrogen regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase. Role of the URE2 gene. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000;84-86:247-254.
• ⁶
  Stowers CC, Ferguson EM, Tanner RD. Development of activity-based cost functions for cellulase, invertase, and other enzymes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008;147:107-117.
• ⁷
  Schnierda T, Bauer FF, Divol B, van Rensburg E, Gorgens JF. Optimization of carbon and nitrogen medium components for biomass production using non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. Lett Appl Microbiol 2014;58:478-485.
• ⁸
  Barratt DH, Derbyshire P, Findlay K, et al. Normal growth of Arabidopsis requires cytosolic invertase but not sucrose synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:13124-13129.
• ⁹
  Das A, Nandi P.Improved production of citric acid from Aspergillus niger by mutagenic treatment. Indian J Exp Biol 1969;7:275-276.
• ¹⁰
  Egorov SN, Semenova IN, Maksimov VN. [Mutual effect of invertase and acid phosphatase from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on their secretion into culture media]. Mikrobiologiia 2000;69:34-37.
• ¹¹
  Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959;31:426-428.
• ¹²
  Myers DK, Lawlor DT, Attfield PV. Influence of invertase activity and glycerol synthesis and retention on fermentation of media with a high sugar concentration by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:145–150.
• ¹³
  Myers DK, Lawlor DT, Attfield PV. Influence of invertase activity and glycerol synthesis and retention on fermentation of media with a high sugar concentration by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:145-150.
• ¹⁴
  Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-254.
• ¹⁵
  Dastager SG, Li WJ, Dayanand A, et al. Separation, identification and analysis of pigment (melanin) production in Streptomyces. Afr J Biotechnol 2006;5:1131-1134.
• ¹⁶
  Pirt SJ. Principles of Microbes and Cell Cultivation London, UK: Blackwell's Scientific Corporation; 1975:86-118.
• ¹⁷
  Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods 7th ed. Iowa, USA: Iowa State University; 1980:32-43.
• ¹⁸
  Weber H, Roitsch T. Invertases and life beyond sucrosecleavage. Trends Plant Sci 2000;5:47-48.
• ¹⁹
  Lazar Z, Rossignol T, Verbeke J, Crutz-Le Coq AM, Nicaud JM, Robak M. Optimized invertase expression and secretion cassette for improving Yarrowia lipolytica growth on sucrose for industrial applications. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2013;40:1273-1283.
• ²⁰
  Vitolo M, Duranti MA, Pellegrim MB. Effect of pH, aeration and sucrose feeding on p-D-fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase activity of intact Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells grown in sugarcane black strap molasses. J Ind Microbiol 1995;15:75-79.
• ²¹
  Persike DS, Bonfim TM, Santos MH, Lyng SM, Chiarello MD, Fontana JD. Invertase and urease activities in the carotenogenic yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (formerly Phaffia rhodozyma). Bioresour Technol 2002;82:79-85.
• ²²
  Madhan SS, Sathyavani R, Niket B. Production and partial purification of invertase using Cympopogan caecius leaf powder as substrate. Indian J Microbiol 2010;50:318-324.
• ²³
  Elorza M, Villanuena R, Sentandreu R. The mechanism of catabolite inhibition of p-D-fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase by glucos in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1977;475:103-112.
• ²⁴
  Cadena PG, Wiggers FN, Silva RA, Lima Filho JL, Pimentel MC. Kinetics and bioreactor studies of immobilized invertase on polyurethane rigid adhesive foam. Bioresour Technol 2011;102:513-518.
• ²⁵
  Gomez SJR, Augur C, Viniegra-Gozalez G. p-D-Fructofuranosidase fructohydrolase production by Aspergillus niger in submerged and solid-state fermentation. Biotechnol Lett 2000;22:1255-1258.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Mar 2016

History

• Received
  8 Jan 2015
• Accepted
  17 July 2015