Resistance patterns, ESBL genes, and genetic relatedness of Escherichia coli from dogs and owners

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pet dogs can be considered a potential threat of infection for the human population. Our objective was to characterize the resistance pattern, extended spectrum beta-lactamase production and genetic relatedness of multiresistant E. coli strains isolated from dogs (n = 134), their owners (n = 134), and humans who claim to have no contact with dogs (n = 44, control), searching for sharing of strains. The strains were assessed for their genetic relatedness by phylogenetic grouping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Multiresistant E. coli strains were isolated from 42 (31.3%) fecal samples from pairs of dogs and owners, totaling 84 isolates, and from 19 (43.1%) control group subjects. The strains showed high levels of resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole regardless of host species or group of origin. The bla_TEM, bla_CTX-M, and bla_SHV genes were detected in similar proportions in all groups. All isolates positive for bla genes were ESBL producers. The phylogenetic group A was the most prevalent, irrespective of the host species. None of the strains belonging to the B2 group contained bla genes. Similar resistance patterns were found for strains from dogs, owners and controls; furthermore, identical PFGE profiles were detected in four (9.5%) isolate pairs from dogs and owners, denoting the sharing of strains. Pet dogs were shown to be a potential household source of multiresistant E. coli strains.

Keywords
Escherichia coli; Antimicrobial resistance; Dogs; Genetic relatedness

Introduction

The implications of microbial resistance for public health have increased the interest of the scientific community in the presence and circulation of resistant organisms between pets and the human population. Among pets, dogs share a close proximity with humans, and proximity is known to increase the possibility of transmitting resistant bacteria between these host species. It is important to note that the bacterial ability to transfer genetic cassettes, which confer resistance to several classes of drugs, and observations of the spread of resistance have increased in recent years.^1,2 The molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance could be very useful not only in surveillance studies and monitoring and tracking of multidrug-resistant strains but also in obtaining information about commonality among human and animal bacterial isolates.

Escherichia coli is characterized by a substantial genetic diversity, broad host range, versatility in pathogenic potential, and distribution between hosts in the environment.³E. coli isolates, commensal or pathogenic, obtained from humans and other animals, have been extensively studied and characterized in terms of their drug resistance profiles based on their phenotypic sensitivity to various antimicrobial drugs as well as by their genetic resistance to major classes of antibiotics detected by molecular assays of genetic similarities among isolates.^4–6 Similarities in resistance profiles among isolates have been described, and the molecular characterization of these isolates has demonstrated substantial differences depending on the population and the geographic region of origin. In general, comparisons of resistance profiles are performed on samples of individuals who are not necessarily cohabiting and are therefore not epidemiologically related. Further studies are needed to characterize related human and dog isolates in Brazil as well as to investigate the possibility of humans and canines sharing multiresistant strains. The aim of this study was to compare resistance profiles of isolates of E. coli from the intestinal tracts of dogs and their owners and to assess the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes in E. coli isolates recovered from dogs and humans living in the same household. In addition, we intended to characterize the genetic relatedness among antimicrobial-resistant isolates.

Materials and methods

Study design

A total of 134 fecal sample pairs from dogs and their owners of households located in the city of Rio das Ostras (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) were studied. Every owner (>18 years old) chosen for the study had only one dog. A control group of 44 fecal samples from individuals who claimed have no contact with dogs was also included in the study. The samples were collected for one year (2010), and the human and dog participants had not been using antimicrobials for at least three months prior to the study. Bacterial strains were selected using a protocol for growth in selective media containing antibiotics. The protocol of this study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of HUAP/UFF (CAAE0146.0.258.000-09) and the Animal Ethics Committee of the NAL/UFF (NAL00126-09), and it was approved and certified by both committees.

Bacterial samples

Fecal samples on swabs from dogs and humans were obtained and processed for testing. Typical E. coli colonies were selected and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. After enrichment growth in E. coli broth containing gentamicin (8 µg/mL) and cephalothin (32 µg/mL), the samples were cultured on MacConkey agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with gentamicin (8 µg/mL) and cephalothin (32 µg/mL) to promote the growth of potentially multidrug-resistant E. coli strains.⁷ Samples that did not grow were discarded. For quality control purposes, each sample was also inoculated into medium without antibiotics. Three colonies, believed to be E. coli, were chosen from the MacConkey agar containing antibiotics and identified based on standard biochemical tests.⁸

The characterization portion of this study included only isolates that displayed multidrug resistance, which was defined as resistance to two or more classes of drugs. With our protocol of selective isolation and susceptibility testing, one hundred and three multidrug-resistant E. coli isolates were identified from dogs (n = 42), their respective owners (n = 42) and control subjects (n = 19).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

E. coli isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to the drugs ampicillin (AMP), amoxicillin + clavulanate (AMC), cephalexin (CEF), chloramphenicol (CLO), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SUT), streptomycin (EST) + gentamicin (GEN), doxycycline (DOX) + tetracycline (TET), ciprofloxacin (CIP), ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefepime (CPM), cefotaxime (CTX) and aztreonam (ATM) using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methodologies and interpretive criteria.^9,10

Disk approximation tests using the drugs AMC, CAZ, ATM, CTX and CPM were performed on all isolates to screen for ESBL producers as previously described¹¹ and according to CLSI recommendations (2012 S22). The bacterial strains E. coli ATCC 25922 and Klebsiella pneumoniae 700603 were used as control strains.

Characterization and identification of beta-lactamase genes

The presence of the beta-lactamase (bla) genes bla_TEM, bla_CTX-M and bla_SHV was detected by polymerase chain reactions (PCR)in third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin- and ATM-resistant strains classified as those exceeding the breakpoints recommended by the CLSI (2012) and those that tested positive in disk approximation experiments.¹¹ The primers and amplification conditions used in PCR assays are listed in Table 1. The bacterial strains used as positive controls in PCR reactions for the detection of bla genes were: E. coli H21, E. coli A41 (previously characterized¹²), and K. pneumonia (ATCC 700603) for genes bla_TEM, bla_CTX-M and bla_SHV, respectively. E. coli DH5 α was used as a negative control.

Table 1
Primers and amplification conditions used in PCR reactions for the detection of ESBL genes and phylogenetic characterization.

Gene or target region	Primers	Amplicon size (bp)	Annealing temperature (°C)	Reference
bla TEM	T1 ATTCTTGAAGACGAAAGGGCCT	1100	55	Wiegand et al. 14
	T3 TTGGTCTGACAGTTACCAATGC
bla SHV	S1 ATGAGTTATATTAGAATGGT	860	58	Fu et al. 15
	S2 GTTAGCGTTGCCAGTGCTCG
bla CTX	CTM-MA CGCTTTGCGATGTGCAG	550	60	Bonnet et al. 16
	CTX-MB ACCGCGATATCGTTGGT
chu A	GACGAACCAACGGTCAGGAT	279	55	Clermont et al. 13
	TGCCGCCAGTACCAAAGACA
yja A	TGAAGTGTCAGGAGACGCTG	211
	ATGGAGAATGCGTTCCTCAAC
tspE4.C2	GAGTAATGTCGGGGCATTCA	152
	CGCGCCAACAAAGTATTACG

Determination of phylogenetic groups

The E. coli isolates were subjected to phylogenetic classification according to the methodology described by Clermont et al.¹³ based on standard PCR amplification of the genes yjaA, chuA and a DNA fragment TspE4.C2. The primers and amplification conditions used are shown in Table 1.

PFGE assays

Paired isolates of E. coli from dogs and owners presenting similar profiles of resistance and ESBL resistance genes were selected for pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of XbaI digested total DNA according to a standardized methodology of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (http://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/pathogens/index.html). The generated PFGE profiles of within-household isolates were compared according criteria proposed by Tenover¹⁷: indistinguishable (I) – nodistinct bands; closely related (CR)-2-3 distinct bands; possibly related (PR) – 4–6 distinct bands; different (D) – more than seven distinct bands. Restriction fragment profiles were also compared by using the Bio Numerics ^® software version6.6 (Applied Maths, Austin, TX), using the Dice similarity index and the UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean) clustering method to construct the dendrograms. E. coli isolates with ≥94% PFGE similarly were considered to be clonal.⁵

Statistical analysis

The prevalence of resistance to antimicrobials, the presence of ESBL genes and the distribution of phylogenetic groups among canine, human and control group samples were compared using the Chi-squared test with p ≤ 0.05 used as the criterion for statistical significance.

Results and discussion

Multiresistant E. coli strains were selectively isolated from 42 (31.3%) fecal sample pairs from dogs and their owners, totaling 84 isolates, and from 19 (43.1%) control group subjects. The frequency of multiresistant E. coli obtained from fecal samples can reach 89%, according to some studies, with frequencies that vary according to the selection criteria.^18–21 To recover strains that exhibited potential resistance to multiple antimicrobials, we used cephalothin. Cephalothin resistance is clinically significant because it is frequently found in situations without strong selectivity (water reservoirs and non-hospital locations). Cephalothin resistance is also associated with other resistance markers, including markers for chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, which are considered common markers in our categorization. Gentamicin was also used in our identification of multidrug resistance, due to the high correlation between gentamicin resistance and multiresistance profiles in nosocomial strains.⁷ Because of this selective isolation protocol, some samples did not grow in the presence of the antimicrobials mentioned, and thus we may have lost some multiresistant strains sensitive to the drugs used in the selection. All of the isolates included in our study, however, were resistant to at least two drug classes, presumably because they were all subjected to a selective isolation procedure. When the same resistance profile was observed in a dog and owner pair, a different method of selection was used to enhance the detection of lower prevalence clones. This method, described by Damborg and colleagues,²² entails selecting colonies that grow in the inhibition zones formed by the drugs amikacin, gentamicin, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim on MacConkey agar, and submitting these for identification. This was done to enhance the identification of multidrug-resistant strains common to both dogs and owners of subject pairs.

Among the resistant E. coli fecal isolates, 74 patterns were observed, each with resistance to at least two drug classes (data not shown). Across all groups, the most frequent resistance patterns were AMP/EST (13.6%) followed by AMP/EST/SUT (3.9%). There were no significant differences in the resistance frequencies among the tested drugs except for sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim for which the human isolates from owners and control group subjects had statistically higher resistance frequencies than the canine isolates (p ≤ 0.05). Other studies showed few patterns comparable to our data.^21–23 In a similar study, Skurnik et al.²⁴ compared fecal E. coli from different animal species and noted that the resistance prevalence of strains was similar, but dogs showed the highest levels of multiresistant strains like those found in humans. These data are similar to those obtained in our study.

In our study, the highest frequency of resistance was recorded for ampicillin, tetracycline, streptomycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Table 2). Resistance to streptomycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been observed in other studies of dog fecal isolates^{18–21,23,25} and human fecal isolates.^26,27 Aminopenicillins and aminoglycosides appear most often among the three classes of drugs with high frequencies of resistance in studies of samples of animal origin.^{6,21,23,28–34} Strains resistant to the carbapenems tested in this study were not detected.

Table 2
Numbers of resistant E. coli isolates of fecal origin (humans and dogs) for the drugs tested.

Antimicrobials	Number of resistant isolates (%)
	Dogs n = 42	Humans (owners) n = 42	Humans (control) n = 19
AMP	36 (85.7)	31 (73.8)	17 (89.4)
AMC	15 (35.7)	10 (23.8)	4 (21.1)
CFE	14 (33.3)	13 (30.9)	8 (42.1)
CAZ	7 (16.6)	3 (7.1)	4 (21.1)
CPM	4 (9.5)	3 (7.1)	3 (15.8)
CTX	8 (19.4)	6 (14.3)	2 (10.5)
CRO	9 (21.4)	6 (14.3)	5 (26.3)
ATM	7 (16.6)	6 (14.3)	5 (26.3)
GEN	13 (30.9)	17 (40.5)	11 (57.8)
EST	28 (66.6)	27 (64.3)	11 (57.8)
CLO	10 (23.8)	14 (33.3)	5 (26.3)
CIP	5 (11.9)	9 (21.4)	2 (10.5)
SUT	13 (30.9)	23 (54.7)	12 (63.2)
TET	21 (50.0)	22 (52.3)	11 (57.8)
DOX	14 (33.3)	11 (26.2)	5 (26.3)

• AMP, ampicillin; AMC, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid; CFE, cephalexin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CPM, cefepime; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; ATM, aztreonam; GEN, gentamicin; EST, streptomycin; CLO, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SUT, sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim; TET, tetracycline; DOX, doxycycline.

Importantly, the strains analyzed in this study were selected using media containing antibiotics, and although resistance rates may have been higher than reported elsewhere, the prevalence data, especially for ampicillin and streptomycin, were similar to those observed in other studies. Stenske et al.⁵ also compared the resistance profiles of fecal strains from dogs and their owners, obtaining high frequencies of resistance to cephalothin, ampicillin, and streptomycin in both groups, a result comparable to our current findings, although our frequencies were higher and we used cephalexin rather than cephalothin. Harada et al.³⁵ observed similarities among isolates from dogs and humans; however, they showed significant differences between the groups analyzed in terms of which drugs corresponded to the highest rates of resistance.

Comparisons of strains of clinical origin has also been a focus of study of the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance and has shown that the drugs ampicillin, streptomycin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim exhibit high frequencies of resistance in strains of both human origin^36–38 and dog origin.^6,28–33 With regard to isolates from dogs, resistance to the first-generation cephalosporins, including cephalothin and cephalexin, was also identified in the studies cited. Differences in the proportions of resistance have been noted in relation to the site of infection, for example, in urinary infection, pyometra and osteomyelitis, in which different levels of resistance to the same drugs were encountered.^18,39–41 Some studies characterizing resistance in strains originating from human patients have analyzed the prevalence of resistant infections in samples from hospital patients and outpatients.⁴² These studies show many differences in resistance prevalence, related not only to the origin of the samples but also to the site of infection, the continent and country where the study took place as well as the profiles of the patients from which the samples originated. Differences are also attributed to the repertoire of antibiotics used in the study.

In the current study, 28.5% of the E. coli isolates from dogs were resistant to at least one antibiotic belonging to the third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins and were positive for ESBL by disk-approximation test. This profile occurred in 16.6% and 36.8% of isolates from dog owners and control subjects, respectively. These differences, however, were not significant. Resistance to third-and fourth-generation cephalosporins is suggestive of beta-lactamase production by the isolates. In our tests, we detected beta-lactam resistance genes of the bla_TEM, bla_CTX-M and bla_SHV families in isolates of both human and dog origin (Table 3).

Table 3
Phylogenetic groups and ESBL genes among fecal E. coli isolates from dogs, their owners, and control human subjects.

Class	Type	Number of Isolates (%)			Total (%)
		Dogs ( n = 42)	Owners ( n = 42)	Controls ( n = 19)
Phylogenetic group	A	21 (50)	24 (57.1)	10 (52.6)	55 (53.4)
	B1	09 (21.4)	08 (19.1)	02 (10.5)	19 (18.4)
	B2	03 (7.2)	04 (9.5)	00 (0)	07 (6.9)
	D	09 (21.4)	06 (14.3)	7 (36.9)	22 (21.3)
ESBL gene a	bla TEM	3	4	0
	bla TEM/ bla CTX-M	4	1	3
	bla CTX-M	4	2	4
	bla TEM/ bla CTX-M/ bla SHV	1	1	0
	Total	12 (28.6)	8 (19.0)	7 (36.8)	27 (26.2)

• ^a
  All isolates carrying an ESBL gene were also positive in phenotypic tests.

We detected at least one ESBL encoding gene in 26.2% of the E. coli isolates and all of them were also positive in the phenotypic tests. However, five isolates (8H, 9H, 57H, 22F, 38F), despite presenting phenotypes suggestive of ESBL production, did not test positive for any of the three bla genes surveyed in our study. Other ESBL genes may be present in these strains because the OXA and CMY gene families are also common in E. coli.⁴³

The bla_CTX-M gene was significantly more prevalent in strains from the control group than in the other two groups; furthermore, all ESBL positive isolates in this group were positive for CTX-M. In dog isolates, the bla_TEM gene was present in 66.7% of the strains that tested positive for ESBL genes, and the bla_CTX-M gene was detected in 75% of these isolates. Only 8.4% of the dog isolates were positive for the bla_SHV gene. In human strains, the prevalent ESBL gene family was the bla_TEM family. The bla_CTX-M gene was present in similar proportions in strains of human and dog origin from the same household. The bla_SHV gene was detected in 8.4% of the human isolates.

The detection of ESBL genes in isolates of pet dogs was first published in 1988.⁴³ Other studies have also reported the presence of the bla genes in isolates from dogs, especially isolates of clinical origin. Different subtypes of the bla gene CTX-M are often detected in extraintestinal clinical isolates^44,45 and in fecal isolates.^22,29,46 The bla_TEM gene, detected in clinical strains from dogs since 2002,^{6,28,44,45,47} was also found in intestinal isolates.^19,21,29,46 For the gene bla_SHV, data are similar, with detection in both clinical^29,44 and fecal isolates.^6,29,48 The prevalence of these genes in dog E. coli strains, however, is not well established.

The prevalence of ESBL genes in human clinical specimens varies considerably, depending on the origin of the strains, whether the infection originated in a hospital or in a community setting, and on the site of infection. Generally, isolates from infections acquired in hospitals exhibit more complex profiles with broader repertoires of resistance compared to isolates of community-acquired infections. Recent data indicate a prevalence of ESBL bla_CTX-M genes in the bloodstream^49,50 and in other infections in hospital settings.⁵¹ Less than a decade ago, TEM and SHV ESBL isolates were thought to be limited to the hospital environment, and CTX-MESBL isolates were detected in urinary tract infections in community settings.⁵² Currently, the most prevalent ESBL gene identified in isolates across many countries is the CTX-M gene, particularly the CTX-M-15 gene, which is associated with IncF variant plasmids.⁵³ The epidemiological profile of highly mutable enterobacteria can be considered an additional factor in this variability, which greatly influenced the spread of plasmids and other transposable elements acting as mobile carriers of multiple resistance genes against drugs, including aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.⁵⁴

In our study, the distribution of phylogenetic groups in the host species examined was similar in all groups, with the phylogenetic group A being the most prevalent (Table 3), occurring in 50% of the canine strains, 57.2% of the human strains and 52.6% of the control group. For fecal strains, this finding is consistent with literature that describes the majority of isolates from commensal strains, regardless of their repertoire of resistance, belonging to groups A or B1.⁵⁵

The distribution of phylogroups among dog isolates, however, has been shown to differ in terms of prevalence in extraintestinal, commensal and clinical samples. In the case of extraintestinal isolates, where the predominant phylogroups were expected to be groups B2 and D, Gibson et al.³² found no isolates belonging to group B2, whereas Maynard et al.⁶ reported a 63% frequency of the B2 phylogroup in extraintestinal samples. Moreover, commensal strains from animals in general predominantly included the groups A and B1. Fecal strains from dogs in a study by Harada et al.³⁵ showed a high prevalence of group B2. Davis et al.²⁵ also observed a predominance of B2 (and D) in their isolates from different anatomical regions of healthy dogs, including the rectal area.

Studies comparing human and canine isolates in terms of antimicrobial resistance profiles used samples of clinical origin, which had a higher prevalence of groups B2 and D, as expected. However, Harada et al.³⁵ analyzed fecal samples from dogs and their owners without using antimicrobial agents for selective isolation, and they observed a higher prevalence of group B2, whereas Damborg et al.²² reported that in their experiments, human fecal isolates more often belonged to group A and the dog isolates to group B1. A study by Clermont et al.⁴ showed that extraintestinal infection is mostly caused by E. coli strains of group B2. An assessment of extraintestinal clinical isolates from dogs revealed that the two main groups of E. coli resistant to fluoroquinolones are A and D.⁵⁶ Data reported in a study by Skurnik et al.,⁵⁷ however, suggested that clinical isolates from group B2 are less resistant to antimicrobials than non-B2 isolates.

In our tests, 12 ESBL isolates belonged to group A and 10 to group D, and no ESBL isolates carrying the genes bla_TEM, bla_SHV and bla_CTX-M were included in group B2. Our data suggest that resistant commensal E. coli strains do not necessarily belong to the phylogroups expected from resistant pathogenic strains. The explanation for this observation requires further investigation.

The presence of ESBL genes was similar in E. coli isolates from dogs and from their owners, especially in some human and dog isolates from the same household. Thus, 18 E. coli isolates comprising nine isolate pairs from dogs and owners that presented similar antimicrobial resistance, ESBL genes and phylogenetic group profiles were selected for PFGE assays (Table 4). By applying the Tenover criteria to each isolate pair from the same household, we detected four isolate pairs with identical patterns. The dendrogram constructed with the PFGE profiles of these isolates reinforces the relatedness between these four strain pairs, and it shows a strong similarity to an isolate pair with another dog isolate (Fig. 1).

Table 4
Resistance, ESBL genes and genetic relatedness of pairs of E. coli isolates of fecal origin (dogs and humans within a household) with similar profiles.

Isolate a	Host species	Resistance phenotype b	ESBL genes			Phylogroup	PFGE c
			bla TEM	bla CTX-M	bla SHV
15F	Dog	AMP AMC CFE CAZ CTX ATM	−	+	−	D	−
15H	Human	AMP AMC CFE CTX CRO	−	+	−	A	−
23F	Dog	AMP EST CLO SUT TET	−	−	−	D	I
23H	Human	AMP EST CLO SUT TET	−	−	−	A	I
27F	Dog	AMP CFE EST	−	−	−	B1	D
27H	Human	AMP CFE EST	−	−	−	A	D
48F	Dog	AMP CFE CAZ CTX CRO GEN EST CLO SUT	+	+	−	A	I
48H	Human	AMP CFE CTX CRO GEN EST CLO SUT TET	+	+	−	B1	I
49F	Dog	AMP AMC CFE CPM CTX CRO GEN EST CLO CIP SUT TET	−	+	−	B1	D
49H	Human	AMP CFE CPM CTX CRO GEN EST CLO SUT TET	+	−	−	B1	D
59F	Dog	AMP EST	−	−	−	B1	D
59H	Human	AMP EST	−	−	−	B1	D
61F	Dog	AMP AMC EST CLO SUT TET DOX	−	−	−	B2	I
61H	Human	AMP AMC EST CLO SUT TET DOX	−	−	−	B2	I
58F	Dog	AMP AMC EST CLO	+	−	−	B1	−
58H	Human	AMP EST CLO	−	−	−	B1	−
92F	Dog	AMP CAZ ATM GEN EST CIP SUT TET DOX	+	+	+	B1	I
92H	Human	AMP ATM GEN EST CIP SUT TET DOX	+	−	+	B1	I

• ^a
  The letter F designates canine fecal isolates; H, human fecal isolates (dog owners).
• ^b
  AMP, ampicilin; AMC, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid; CFE, cephalexin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CPM, cefepime; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; ATM, aztreonam; GEN, gentamicin; EST, streptomycin; CLO, chloramphenicol; CIP, ciprofloxacin; SUT, sulfametoxazol + trimethoprim; TET, tetracycline; DOX, doxycycline.
• ^c
  Tenover criteria applied for each isolate pair from the same household: I, indistinguishable; D, different; − not possible to compare due the DNA degradation of one isolate during the PFGE restriction.

Fig. 1
Dendrogram showing genomic PFGE fingerprint patterns of fecal E. coli isolates from dogs (F) and owners (H) with similar resistance profiles. The dendrogram was constructed using the Dice similarity coefficient and UPGMA clustering methods. The degree of similarity (%) is shown on the scale bar.

Some strains recovered from dogs and owners showed phenotypic and genotypic similarities suggesting a clonal relationship. Indeed, we demonstrated in this study the sharing of multiresistant E. coli strains in 9.5% (4/42) of the pairs of isolates from the dogs and their owners that we studied.

In comparisons between E. coli isolates of human and dog origin, many similarities have been identified in the various traits studied, especially with regard to the repertoire of virulence of the strains.^5,6,35,58,59 It has been suggested that the host specificity of E. coli strains is determined by specific adhesions.⁴ Studies have shown a similar occurrence of virulence factors associated with extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli in strains isolated from dogs and humans.^6,58,60 Some studies suggest that uropathogenic E. coli strains are shared between dogs and humans,⁵⁸ whereas others show a significant diversity in the virulence repertoires of strains isolated from distinct species or even within the same species.^6,35

Regarding the genetics of resistance, the data are somewhat heterogeneous and differ depending on the population and the geographic region of origin as well as on whether the strains are commensal or pathogenic.^5,35,48 Despite the fact that a positive correlation between the presence of plasmids and integrons with a multiresistant phenotype is described in several studies,^24,61 additional factors that shape the genetic structure of these strains are important.^55,62 Comparisons of resistance profiles are not always performed on strains from cohabiting individuals, and samples are therefore not always epidemiologically related. The characterization, therefore, of related human and canine isolates, as well as the possibility of sharing multiresistant strains between humans and dogs, requires further study in Brazil.

Conclusion

We detected the simultaneous presence of multidrug-resistant E. coli in dogs and their owners, albeit with different phenotypic profiles of antibiotic resistance, especially for ESBLs. Furthermore, some strains from dogs and humans of the same household had similar resistance patterns, ESBL genes, identical phylogenetic groups and identical or closely related PFGE profiles. These data demonstrate high degrees of homology and therefore the possibility that resistant E. coli clones are circulating between individuals and animals in the same environment. Indeed some strains showed clonal relationships indicating within-household sharing.

In addition, our data suggest that the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant commensal E. coli is very similar in dogs and humans and that there is no difference among the resistant E. coli isolated from dog-owners and humans without pet dogs.

This area needs more accurate investigations and many uncertainties remain regarding how resistance arises and spreads in the environment and among cohabiting humans and domestic animals.

• Associate Editor: Roxane Maria Fontes Piazza

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Grant from State of Rio de Janeiro Research Foundation (FAPERJ Proc E-26/111.520/2010). We also thank Dr. Felipe P. Gonçalves Neves for their support in the dendograms constructions.

References

• ¹
  Alekshun MN, Levy SB. Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell 2007;128:1037-1050; Leonard EK, Pearl DL, Finley RL, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli recovered from pet dogs from volunteer households in Ontario (2005-06). J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:174-181.
• ²
  Carattoli A. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:2227-2238.
• ³
  Torres AG, Arenas-Hernández MM, Laguna IM. Overview of Escherichia coli In: Torres AG, ed. Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Latin America Bentham Science Publishers; 2010:1-7.
• ⁴
  Clermont O, Olier M, Hoede C, et al. Animal and human pathogenic Escherichia coli strains share common genetic backgrounds. Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:654-662.
• ⁵
  Stenske KA, Bemis DA, Gillespie BE, et al. Compariso of clonal relatedness and antimicrobial susceptibility of fecal Escherichia coli from healthy dogs and their owners. Am J Vet Res 2009;70:1108-1116.
• ⁶
  Maynard C, Bekal S, Sanschagrin F, et al. Heterogeneity among virulence and antimicrobial profiles of extraintestinal E. coli isolates of animal and human origin. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5444-5452.
• ⁷
  Meirelles-Pereira F, de Meirelles Santos Pereira A, da Silva MCG, et al. Ecological aspects of the antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of importance to human infections. Braz J Microbiol 2002;33:287-293.
• ⁸
  Ewing WH. Edwards and Ewing's Identification of Enterobacteriaceae 4th ed. Elsevier Science Publishing Co.; 1986.
• ⁹
  Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. CSLI Document M100-S22 Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.
• ¹⁰
  Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, Approved Standard-Eleventh Edition. CLSI Document M02-A11 Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.
• ¹¹
  Jarlier V, Nicolas MH, Fournier G, Philippon A. Extended broad-spectrum beta-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer beta-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev Infect Dis 1988;10:867-878.
• ¹²
  Alves DP (MSc Dissertation) Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Isolated from Human and Dogs Niterói, Brasil: Instituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense; 2009.
• ¹³
  Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000;66:4555-4558.
• ¹⁴
  Wiegand I, Geiss HK, Mack D, Stürenburg E, Seifert H. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:1167-1174.
• ¹⁵
  Fu Y Zhang F Zhang W,et al. Differential expression of bla(SHV) related to susceptibility to ampicillin in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007;29:344-347.
• ¹⁶
  Bonnet R, Recule C, Baraduc R, et al. Effect of D240G substitution in a novel ESBL CTX-M-27. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:29-35.
• ¹⁷
  Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2233-2239.
• ¹⁸
  Pedersen K, Pedersen K, Jensen H, Finster K, Jensen VF, Heuer OE. Occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from diagnostic samples from dogs. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:775-781.
• ¹⁹
  Costa D, Poeta P, Sáenz Y, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and resistance genes in faecal Escherichia coli isolates recovered from healthy pets. Vet Microbiol 2008;127:97-105.
• ²⁰
  Harada K, Morimoto E, Kataoka Y, Takahashi T. Clonal spread of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli isolates among pups in two kennels. Acta Vet Scand 2011:11. Available at: http://www.actavetscand.com/content/53/1/
  » http://www.actavetscand.com/content/53/1/
• ²¹
  Wedley AL, Maddox TW, Westgarth C, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in dogs in a cross-sectional, community-based study. Vet Rec 2011;168:354-359.
• ²²
  Damborg P, Nielsen SS, Guardabassi L. Escherichia coli shedding patterns in humans and dogs: insights into within-household transmission of phylotypes associated with urinary tract infections. Epidemiol Infect 2009;137:1457-1464.
• ²³
  Nam HM, Lee HS, Byun JW, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates from stray pet dogs and hospitalized pet dogs in Korea. Microb Drug Resist 2010;16:75-79.
• ²⁴
  Skurnik D, Ruimy R, Andremont A, et al. Effect of human vicinity on antimicrobial resistance and integrons in animal faecal Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;57:1215-1219.
• ²⁵
  Davis JA, Jackson CR, Fedorka-Cray PJ, et al. Anatomical distribution and genetic relatedness of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli from healthy companion animals. J Appl Microbiol 2011;110:597-604.
• ²⁶
  Jelesic Z, Gusman V, Ukropina MM, Kulauzov M, Medic D. Resistance of Escherichia coli from healthy donors and from food - an indicator of antimicrobial resistance level in the population. Med Pregl 2011;64:397-402.
• ²⁷
  Unno T, Han D, Jang J, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic trends in antibiotic resistant pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from humans and farm animals in South Korea. Microbes Environ 2011;26:198-204.
• ²⁸
  Féria C, Ferreira E, Correia JD, Goncalves J, Canica M. Patterns and mechanisms of resistance to p-lactams and p-lactamase inhibitors in uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from dogs in Portugal. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49:77-85.
• ²⁹
  Carattoli A, Lovari S, Franco A, Cordaro G, Di Matteo P, Battisti A. Extended-spectrum p-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolated from dogs and cats in Rome, Italy, from 2001 to 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:833-835.
• ³⁰
  Poeta P,Rodrigues J. Deteccão da resistência a antibióticos de bactérias isoladas de casos clínicos ocorridos em animais de companhia. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2008;60:506-508.
• ³¹
  Kadlec K, Schwarz S. Analysis and distribution of class 1 and class 2 integrons and associated gene cassettes among Escherichia coli isolates from swine, horses, cats and dogs collected in the BfT-GermVet monitoring study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;62:469-473.
• ³²
  Gibson JS, Cobbold RN, Trott DJ. Characterization of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from extraintestinal clinical infections in animals. J Med Microbiol 2010;59(Pt 5):592-598.
• ³³
  Shaheen BW, Boothe DM, Oyarzabal OA, Smaha T. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and clonal relatedness of canine and feline Escherichia coli pathogens expressing multidrug resistance in the United States. J Vet Intern Med 2010;24:323-330.
• ³⁴
  Awji EG, Damte D, Lee SJ, Lee JS, Kim YH, Park SC. The in vitro activity of 15 antimicrobial agents against bacterial isolates from dogs. J Vet Med Sci 2012;74:1091-1094.
• ³⁵
  Harada K, Okada E, Shimizu T, Kataoka Y,Sawada T, Takahashi T. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence profiles, and phylogenetic groups of fecal Escherichia coli isolates: a comparative analysis between dogs and their owners in Japan Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;35:139-144.
• ³⁶
  Dias RCS, Marangoni DV, Smith SP, et al. Clonal composition of Escherichia coli causing community-acquired urinary tract infections in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Microb Drug Resist 2009;15:303-308.
• ³⁷
  Cagnacci S, Gualco L, Debbia E, Schito GC, Marchese A. European emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli clonal groups O25:H4-ST 131 and O15:K52:H1 causing community-acquired uncomplicated cystitis. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:2605-2612.
• ³⁸
  Blatt JM, Miranda MC. Perfil dos microrganismos causadores de infeccões do trato urinário em pacientes internados. Reu Panam Infectol 2005;7:10-14.
• ³⁹
  Hagman R, Greko C. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from bitches with pyometra and from urine samples from other dogs. Vet Rec 2005;157:193-196.
• ⁴⁰
  Lara VM, Donadeli MP, Cruz FSF, Carregaro AB. Multirresistência antimicrobiana em cepas de Escherichia coli isoladas de cadelas compiometra. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2008;60:1032-1034.
• ⁴¹
  Simionato AC, Ramos MCC, Coutinho SDA. Isolamento de bactérias aeróbias e sua sensibilidade a antimicrobianos em processos de osteomielite canina. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2003;55:148-154.
• ⁴²
  Poletto KQ, Reis C. Suscetibilidade antimicrobiana de uropatógenos em pacientes ambulatoriais na Cidade de Goiânia. GO Reu Soc Bras Med Trop 2005;38:416-420.
• ⁴³
  Li XZ, Mehrotra M, Ghimire S, Adewoye L. p-Lactam resistance and p-lactamases in bacteria of animal origin. Vet Microbiol 2007;121:197-214.
• ⁴⁴
  O'Keefe A, Hutton TA, Schifferli DM, Rankin SC. First detection of CTX-M and SHV extended-spectrum p-lactamases in Escherichia coli urinary tract isolates from dogs and cats in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010;54:3489-3492.
• ⁴⁵
  Dierikx CM, van Duijkeren E, Schoormans AHW, et al. Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum-p-lactamase- and AmpC-producing clinical isolates derived from companion animals and horses. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:1368-1374.
• ⁴⁶
  Tamang MD, Nam HM, Jang GC, et al. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum-p-lactamase-producing and plasmid-mediated AmpC p-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from stray dogs in South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:2705-2712.
• ⁴⁷
  Costa D, Poeta P, Brifias L, Sáenz Y Rodrigues J, Torres C. Detection of CTX-M-1 and TEM-52 p-lactamases in Escherichia coli strains from healthy pets in Portugal. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;54:960-961.
• ⁴⁸
  Martins LRL, Pina SMR, Simões RLR, de Matos AJ, Rodrigues P, da Costa PM. Common phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance patterns found in a case study of multiresistant E. coli from cohabitant pets, humans, and household surfaces. J Enuiron Health 2013;75:74-81.
• ⁴⁹
  Courpon-Claudinon A, Lefort A, Panhard X, et al., COLIBAFI Group. Bacteraemia caused by third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in France: prevalence, molecular epidemiology and clinical features. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:557-565.
• ⁵⁰
  NORM/NORM-VET 2011. Usage of Antimicrobial Agents and Occurrence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Norway. Troms ø/Oslo; 2012. ISSN:1502-2307 (print)/1890-9965 (electronic). Available at www.vetinst.no
  » www.vetinst.no
• ⁵¹
  Peirano G, Asensi MD, Pitondo-Silva A, Pitout JDD. Molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum p-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect 2011;17:1039-1043.
• ⁵²
  Paterson DL, Doi Y.A step closer to extreme drug resistance (XDR) in Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:1179-1181.
• ⁵³
  Livermore DM. Fourteen years in resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012;39:283-294.
• ⁵⁴
  Casellas JM. Resistencia a los antibacterianos en América Latina: consecuencias para la infectología. Reu Panam Salud Publica 2011;30:519-528.
• ⁵⁵
  Tenaillon O, Skurnik D, Picard B, Denamur E. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat Reu Microbiol 2010;8:207-217.
• ⁵⁶
  Platell JL, Cobbold RN, Johnson JR, Trott DJ. Clonal group distribution of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli among humans and companion animals in Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010;65:1936-1938.
• ⁵⁷
  Skurnik D, Le Menac'h A, Zurakowski D, et al. Integron-associated antibioti resistance and phylogenetic grouping of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy subjects free of recent antibiotic exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:3062-3065.
• ⁵⁸
  Johnson JR, Stell AL, Delavari P.Canine feces as a reservoir of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 2001;69:1306-1314.
• ⁵⁹
  Von Sydow ACMDG, Coogan JA, Moreno AM, Melville PA, Benites NR. Ocorrência de fatores de virulência em estirpes de Escherichia coli isoladas de fezes de cães errantes. Arq Inst Biol (Sao Paulo) 2006;73:401-407.
• ⁶⁰
  Johnson JR, Johnston B, Clabots CR, Kuskowski MA, Roberts E, DebRoy C. Virulence genotypes and phylogenetic background of Escherichia coli serogroup O6 isolates from humans, dogs, and cats. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:417-422.
• ⁶¹
  Talukdar PK, Rahman M, Rahman M, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and genetic diversity of Escherichia coli isolates from household water supply in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e61090.
• ⁶²
  Carattoli A. Animal reservoirs for extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers. Clin Microbiol Infect 2008;14(Suppl 1):117-123.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Mar 2016

History

• Received
  20 Dec 2013
• Accepted
  9 Oct 2014