Rapid detection of Candida species in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with pulmonary symptoms

Abstract

Candida species, especially C. albicans, are commensals on human mucosal surfaces, but are increasingly becoming one of the important invasive pathogens as seen by a rise in its prevalence in immunocompromised patients and in antibiotic consumption. Thus, an accurate identification of Candida species in patients with pulmonary symptoms can provide important information for effective treatment. A total of 75 clinical isolates of Candida species were obtained from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with pulmonary symptoms. Candida cultures were identified based on nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1-ITS2 rDNA) sequence analysis by polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphisms (PCR-RFLP). Molecular identification indicated that the isolates belonged predominantly to C. albicans (52%), followed by C. tropicalis (24%), C. glabrata (14.7%), C. krusei (5.3%), C. parapsilosis (1.3%), C. kefyr (1.3%) and C. guilliermondii (1.3%). Given the increasing complexity of disease profiles and their management regimens in diverse patients, rapid and accurate identification of Candida species can lead to timely and appropriate antifungal therapy.

Keywords
Candida; Pulmonary; PCR-RFLP

Introduction

Candida spp. are the causative agents in 80% of nosocomial fungal infections.¹ They are frequently isolated from respiratory secretions in mechanically ventilated patients due to either seeding of the lungs during hematogenous dissemination, or aspiration of previously colonized oropharyngeal or gastric contents.² Although the isolation of Candida spp. from the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of immunocompetent individuals is not an indication for treatment,³ nevertheless, 24% of all intensive care physicians prescribe antifungal therapy in immunocompetent, mechanically ventilated patients testing positive for Candida spp.⁴ Although the accuracy of tracheal surveillance cultures is controversial, the absence of Candida spp. in these cultures has a high negative predictive value for disseminated candidiasis in patients with leukemia, lymphoma, or those who have undergone bone marrow transplantation.² Rapid identification of Candida infections can, therefore, help in prompt and appropriate antifungal therapy. However, the diagnosis of pulmonary candidiasis is still controversial,⁵ and the detection of primary fungal lung infection requires a lung biopsy.⁶ However, in routine clinical practice, lung biopsies cannot be used for the management of patients with suspected Candida infection.⁷

Although C. albicans is the most frequently isolated pathogen,⁸ an increase in the incidence of infections due to other isolates, including C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis, which are the cause of opportunistic infection oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC), has been reported.⁹ In recent decades, C. glabrata, which is resistant to fluconazole, has emerged as the second most common causative organism (10–30% of all yeast isolates) of mucosal and invasive fungal infections,¹⁰ trailing only C. albicans (50–60%). A large multicenter study showed an increase in the occurrence of C. glabrata infections from 14% in 1993 to 24% in 1998.¹⁰ The reasons for this increase have been investigated, and include shifts in the distribution of infections by certain Candida spp. and along with both endogenous and exogenous reservoirs.¹¹ Therefore, an accurate identification of the causative Candida spp. in patients with pulmonary symptoms, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, will enable proper diagnosis and effective treatment, apart from broadening the physicians' knowledge of the epidemiology of Candida spp.^5,12,13 Thus, this study aims to accurately identify and quantify the prevalence of Candida spp. present in the BAL fluid of both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with pulmonary disorders such as pulmonary candidiasis or colonization.

Materials and methods

Specimens and preparation

During a 16-month period, 75 BAL fluid specimens were obtained from both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with pulmonary disorders who were referred to the Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran for bronchoscopy. BAL specimens were submitted to the Medical Mycology laboratory at the School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. The BAL fluid specimens, requested and obtained by a specialist physician, were collected in sterile vessels without any conservative media and transferred to the laboratory. The starting volume of BAL fluid ranged between 4 and 7 mL. Specimens were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min, pellet vortexed and resuspended in a small volume of supernatant (total 0.5–1 mL).¹⁴

A 150 µL aliquot of the sediment was mixed with a drop of 20% potassium hydroxide (KOH) on a microscopic slide, covered with a large sterile coverslip (24 mm × 50 mm) and viewed under 100 × and 400 × magnifications. The aliquots of the specimens (75 µL) were plated on both 4% Sabouraud glucose agar (SGA) (Difco, USA) and Brain Heart Infusion agar (BHI) (Difco, USA).¹⁵ Plates were incubated for 2–4 days at 30 °C and monitored for growth of yeast colonies. Colony isolates were suspended in sterile distilled water and kept at −4 °C until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and molecular studies

To extract genomic DNA from the yeast colonies, FTA ^® Elute MicroCards (Whatman Inc., Clifton, NJ, USA) were used¹⁶ according to manufacturer's instructions but with minor modifications as described by Mohammadi et al.¹⁷ The extracted DNA samples were stored at −20 °C until use. Quality control was ensured by adding 18 reference strains of medically important yeasts to the dataset, supplied by the Teikyo University Institute of Medical Mycology (TIMM), Tokyo, Japan. The reference strains used were C. tropicalis (ATCC 750), C. albicans (TIMM 1768), C. glabrata (ATCC 90030), C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019), C. nivariensis (CBS 10161), C. bracarensis (CBS 10154), C. krusei (ATCC 6258), C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsilosis, C. guilliermondii (TIMM 3400), C. lusitaniae (TIMM 3479), C. famata (JCM 1439), C. kefyr (TIMM 0300), Cryptococcus neoformans (ATCC 90113), C. norvegensis (JCM 2309), C. inconspicua (JCM 9555), C. lusitaniae (TIMM 3479), C. intermedia (JCM 1607), C. rugosa (JCM 1619), C. viswanathii (JCM 9567), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ATCC 9763).

In addition, DNASIS software (Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze GenBank sequences of different yeasts to determine the size of the entire ITS1-5.8SrDNAITS2 region before and after in silico digestion with the Msp I restriction enzyme,¹⁷ and molecular identification was performed based on PCR-RFLP profiles as described previously.^17–19 Briefly, the region was amplified using a PCR mixture containing 5 µL of the 10 × reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 2.5 U of DNA Taq polymerase, 30 pmol of each ITS1 (5'-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3') and ITS4 (5'-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3') primers and 3 µL of extracted DNA, in a final volume of 50 µL. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. An aliquot of 10 µL of each PCR product was digested with the restriction enzyme Msp I (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania), and 12 µL of each RFLP product was fractionated by electrophoresis.

To confirm the validity of the molecular results for identification of common Candida spp., some isolates including C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei and C. tropicalis were subcultured on CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France) and incubated at 35 °C for 2–3 days.

Results

Seventy five isolates were obtained from BAL specimens of 32 immunocompromised and 43 immunocompetent patients. The immunocompromised patient profile included solid-organ cancers (n = 8), intensive care units (ICU) patients (n = 8), autoimmune conditions requiring corticosteroids (n = 7), solid organ transplant recipients (n = 6), bone marrow transplant recipients (n = 3).

Among these patients, 61% were male (n = 46) with an average age of 58.3 ± 17.6 years, and 39% were female (n = 29) with an average age of 50.5 ± 19.8 years. The immunocompetent patients had significant history of respiratory disorders such as cough, dyspnea, chest pain, hemoptysis, bronchial asthma, and the presence of a cavity within an area of consolidation on computerized tomography (CT) imaging. Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics of the patients.

Table 1
Demographics of enrolled patients.

Characteristic	Immunosuppressive condition	No. of BAL specimens	Male/female ratio	Mean age (range)	Age range	Isolated Candida
						C. albicans	C. tropicalis	C. glabrata	C. krusei	C. parapsilosis	C. kefyr	C. guilliermondii
Immunocompetent hosts	–	43	28/15	61.7	16–86	22	12	5	3	0	1	0
Sub-categories of immunocompromised hosts	Solid-organ cancer patients	8	4/4	56.4	21–78	7	1	0	0	0	0	0
	Patients in ICU	8	4/4	39.7	20–73	4	1	2	0	1	0	0
	Patients with autoimmune diseases and corticosteroids consumer	7	4/3	46.4	34–75	3	3	0	0	0	0	1
	SOT recipients	6	4/2	48.5	45–55	3	0	3	0	0	0	0
	BMT recipients	3	2/1	36.7	20–48	0	1	1	1	0	0	0

• BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; ICU, intensive care units; SOT, solid organ transplant; BMT, bone marrow transplant.

Pseudohyphae were seen in 38 specimens and yeast forms were seen in 37 specimens upon direct microscopic examination.

The primer pairs (ITS1 and ITS2) were able to amplify the ITS region and provided a single PCR product. Isolates were identified using a combination of ITS-RFLP with MspI and the ITS-amplicon size as previously established.¹⁷

Seven Candida species, including C. albicans (52%, n = 39), C. tropicalis (24%, n = 18), C. glabrata (14.7%, n = 11), C. krusei (5.3%, n = 4), C. parapsilosis (1.3%, n = 1), C. kefyr (1.3%, n = 1) and C. guilliermondii (1.3%, n = 1) were identified (Table 1).

Importantly, the results of species identification using CHROMagar Candida for selected Candida isolates concurred with those of the PCR-RFLP.

Discussion

Seventy-five Candida-positive isolates were obtained from immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with pulmonary disorders and identified using PCR-RFLP. In recent decades, the prevalence of Candida infections has increased, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The incidence of Candida pneumonia varies in different studies, and ranges between 0.23% and 4.5%.^20,21 Although Candida spp. are frequently isolated from respiratory secretions of mechanically ventilated patients, its presence in respiratory specimens only represents colonization of the tracheobronchial tree, and the criteria for the diagnosis of pulmonary candidiasis are still controversial. In addition, the value of quantitative cultures of respiratory samples in diagnosing Candida pneumonia is unknown,⁵ since this study had two limitations: low specimen number for evaluation of Candida prevalence and lack of histologic findings consistent with pulmonary candidiasis.

The potential clinical importance of species-level identification for Candida infections has been recognized as individual species difference in the expression of putative virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility.^22,23 In addition, rapid identification of Candida spp. can also lead to early and effective antifungal therapy, given the increasing rate at which drug-resistant Candida spp. are being reported.^24,25 However, most yeast isolates obtained from patients with pulmonary disorders, especially from immunocompromised patients, can be identified to the species-level to reduce antifungal resistance among the Candida spp., and associated morbidity and mortality in these patients. Traditional diagnostic methods such as direct examination and culture are not sufficient for the identification of yeast isolates, and in this study, pseudohyphae and yeast forms were seen in different species upon direct microscopy examination, without any significant relationship between species identity and morphology. An exception to this observation is C. glabrata which has only the yeast form. Further, fungal cultures could not differentiate between the Candida species, while all isolates could be successfully identified using PCR-RFLP.

The results of the present study confirm that PCR-RFLP helps in the presumptive identification of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. kefyr and C. guilliermondii, and are similar to other reports.^17–19,26 Although we report a C. albicans prevalence of 52%, it is less than the reported value in other studies (70–80%).^27,28 This could be because, over the last 10–30 years, non-C. albicans Candida (NCAC) species have emerged as important opportunistic pathogens in humans, due to improved diagnostic methods, altered medical practices, differences in patient groups or geographic location.²⁸ Compared to other studies, we show higher incidence of C. tropicalis (24%) and C. glabrata (14.7%) and lower incidence of C. parapsilosis and C. kefyr,^17,29 while that of C. guilliermondii (1.3%) was similar.^17,30

The intriguing observation in our study was the difference in the distribution of the Candida spp. among the immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients: immunocompetent patients showed higher incidence of C. tropicalis, C. krusei, C. kefyr and C. albicans and a lower incidence of C. parapsilosis and C. guilliermondii, compared to immunocompromised patients.

Thus, this study highlights that, Candida isolates can be successfully identified through PCR-RFLP and that such identification is important to show variation in the prevalence of Candida spp. among different patient groups, especially high risk patients with signs of clinical deterioration.

• Associate Editor: Karen Spadari Ferreira

References

• ¹
  Beck-Sagué C, Jarvis WR, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Secular trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in the United States, 1980–1990. J Infect Dis 1993;167:1247–1251.
• ²
  Murray PR, Van Scoy RE, Roberts GD. Should yeasts in respiratory secretions be identified? Mayo Clin Proc 1977;52:42–45.
• ³
  Chastre J, Fagon JY. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:867–903.4.
• ⁴
  Azoulay E, Cohen Y, Zahar JR, et al Practices in non-neutropenic ICU patients with Candida-positive airway specimens. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:1384-1389.
• ⁵
  el-Ebiary M, Torres A, Fàbregas N, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from respiratory samples in critically ill, non-neutropenic patients. An immediate postmortem histologic study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156(Pt 1):583-590.
• ⁶
  Kontoyiannis DP, Reddy BT, Torres HA, et al. Pulmonary candidiasis in patients with cancer: an autopsy study. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:400-403.
• ⁷
  Meersseman W,Lagrou K, Spriet I, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:1526-1531.
• ⁸
  Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. Mucosal candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002;16:793-820, v.
• ⁹
  Heelan JS, Siliezar D, Coon K. Comparison of rapid testing methods for enzyme production with the germ tube method for presumptive identification of Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 1996;34:2847-2849.
• ¹⁰
  Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, et al. Trends in species distribution and susceptibility to fluconazole among blood stream isolates of Candida species in the United States. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999;33:217-222.
• ¹¹
  Cormican MG, Pfaller MA. Epidemiology of candidiasis. Compr Ther 1995;21:653-657.
• ¹²
  Safdar A, Armstrong D. Prospective evaluation of Candida species colonization in hospitalized cancer patients: impact on short-term survival in recipients of marrow transplantation and patients with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002;30:931-935.
• ¹³
  Jha BJ, Dey S, Tamang MD, Joshy ME, Shivananda PG, Brahmadatan KN. Characterization of Candida species isolated from cases of lower respiratory tract infection. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2006;4:290-294.
• ¹⁴
  Zarrinfar H, Saber S, Kordbacheh P, et al. Mycological microscopi and culture examination of 400 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples. Iran J Public Health 2012;41:70-76.
• ¹⁵
  Zarrinfar H, Mirhendi H, Fata A, Khodadadi H, Kordbacheh P. Detection of Aspergillus flavus and A. fumigatus in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of hematopoietic stem cell transplants and hematological malignancies patients by real-time polymerase chain reaction, nested PCR and mycological assays. Jundishapur J Microbiol 2015;8:e13744.
• ¹⁶
  Borman AM, Linton CJ, Miles SJ, Campbell CK, Johnson EM. Ultra-rapid preparation of total genomic DNA from isolates of yeast and mould using Whatman FTA filter paper technology - a reusable DNA archiving system. Med Mycol 2006;44:389-398.
• ¹⁷
  Mohammadi R, Mirhendi H, Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, et al. Molecular identification and distribution profile of Candida species isolated from Iranian patients. Med Mycol 2013;51:657-663.
• ¹⁸
  Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Khoramizadeh M, Yamaguchi H. A one-enzyme PCR-RFLP assay for identification of six medically important Candida species. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2006;47:225-229.
• ¹⁹
  Mirhendi H, Bruun B, Sch0nheyder HC, et al. Molecular screening for Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis among Danish Candida parapsilosis group blood culture isolates: proposal of a new RFLP profile for differentiation. J Med Microbiol 2010;59(P 4):414-420.
• ²⁰
  Masur H, Rosen PP, Armstrong D. Pulmonary disease caused by Candida species. Am J Med 1977;63:914-925.
• ²¹
  Haron E, Vartivarian S, Anaissie E, Dekmezian R, Bodey GP. Primary Candida pneumonia Experience at a large cancer center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 1993;72:137-142.
• ²²
  Agarwal S, Manchanda V,Verma N, Bhalla P. Yeast identification in routine clinical microbiology laboratory and its clinical relevance. Indian J Med Microbiol 2011;29:172-177.
• ²³
  Chauhan R, Abraham J. In vitro antimicrobial potential of the lichen Parmotrema sp. extracts against various pathogens. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2013;16:882-885.
• ²⁴
  Nolte FS, Parkinson T, Falconer DJ, et al. Isolation and characterization of fluconazole- and amphotericin B-resistant Candida albicans from blood of two patients with leukemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:196-199.
• ²⁵
  Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, et al. Bloodstream infections due to Candida species: SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:747-751.
• ²⁶
  Hossein M, Mirhendi SH, Brandão J, Mirdashti R, Rosado L. Comparison of enzymatic method rapid yeast plus system with RFLP-PCR for identification of isolated yeast from vulvovaginal candidiasis. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2011;14:443-450.
• ²⁷
  Samaranayake LP, Fidel PL, Naglik JR, et al. Fungal infections associated with HIV infection. Oral Dis 2002;8(suppl 2):151-160.
• ²⁸
  Silva S, Negri M, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Williams DW, Azeredo J. Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis: biology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and antifungal resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012;36:288-305.
• ²⁹
  Kiehn TE, Edwards FF, Armstrong D. The prevalence of yeasts in clinical specimens from cancer patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;73:518-521.
• ³⁰
  Kiraz N, Oz Y. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of clinical Candida isolates from a university hospital in Turkey over a 5-year period. Med Mycol 2011;49:126-131.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Jan-Mar 2016

History

• Received
  27 Mar 2015
• Accepted
  28 July 2015