The role of gyrA and parC mutations in fluoroquinolones-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Iran

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine mutations in the quinolone-resistance-determining region (QRDR) of gyrA and parC genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. A total of 100 clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from different university-affiliated hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were evaluated by agar dilution assay. DNA sequences of the QRDR of gyrA and parC were determined by the dideoxy chain termination method. Of the total 100 isolates, 64 were resistant to ciprofloxacin. No amino acid alterations were detected in gyrA or parC genes of the ciprofloxacin susceptible or ciprofloxacin intermediate isolates. Thr-83 → Ile substitution in gyrA was found in all 64 ciprofloxacin resistant isolates. Forty-four (68.75%) of them had additional substitution in parC. A correlation was found between the number of the amino acid alterations in the QRDR of gyrA and parC and the level of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistance of the P. aeruginosa isolates. Ala-88 → Pro alteration in parC was generally found in high level ciprofloxacin resistant isolates, which were suggested to be responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance. These findings showed that in P. aeruginosa, gyrA was the primary target for fluoroquinolone and additional mutation in parC led to highly resistant isolates.

Keywords:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Fluoroquinolone resistance; gyrA; parC

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogen^1-3 causing life-threatening infections, especially in immunocompromised patients.^4-6 Often these infections are difficult to treat due to the intrinsic resistance of the species⁷ as well as its remarkable ability to acquire resistance to a wide range of antimicrobial agents.⁸ Fluoroquinolones are the only accessible antibiotics for effective oral treatment of infections caused by this organism.⁹ Among fluoroquinolones, ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are widely used in the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections.¹⁰

Fluoroquinolones act by inhibiting the action of target enzymes, DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, with both enzymes playing a principal role in DNA replication.¹¹ DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are heterotetrameric enzymes that are composed of two subunits encoded by the gyrA, gyrB and parC, parE, respectively.¹² The gyrA and gyrB genes are homologs to parC and parE, respectively.¹³ The mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa include mutations in the DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV,^14,15 overexpression of efflux pump system and the innate impermeability of the membrane.¹⁶ Alterations in the so-called quinolone-resistance-determining region (QRDR) within DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV are the major mechanisms for fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa.^17-20

Moreover, isolates with mutations in QRDR of gyrA and parC show the highest levels of fluoroquinolone resistance.²¹ Although amino acid alterations in the gyrB and parE genes have been described, but the frequency of these mutations is low, with only a complementary role in fluoroquinolone resistance.^18,21

Several studies from Iran have reported the high prevalence of MDR strains among Iranian hospitals and strains isolated from hospitalized patients; especially, burn patients have show high level resistance to most available antibiotics.^22,23

The prevalence of mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV has not been well studied in Iran. This is the largest analysis of the QRDR of gyrA and parC in the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from Iran. The aim of this study was to examine the mutations in gyrA and parC genes and characterize their correlation with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistance, as well as the evaluation of their effect on ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) among the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa.

Materials and methods

Bacterial isolates

In a prospective study, a total of 100 non-repetitive clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were collected, between December 2013, and July 2014, from four Educational-Health Care Centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Northwest Iran. The bacterial isolates were recovered from different clinical specimens such as urine (29%), wound discharge (25%), tracheal aspirates (21%), blood (8%) and other clinical specimens (Table 1). All isolates were identified by standard conventional biochemical tests.²⁴

Table 1
Distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates by the site of isolation and hospital origin.

Source of isolates	Hospital origin				Total no. of isolates
	Imam Reza	Sina	Koodakan	Shahid Madani
Tracheal aspirate	7	4	6	4	21
Wound discharge	7	8	4	6	25
Urine	7	6	9	7	29
Blood	1	4	1	2	8
Throat culture	1	0	3	0	4
Catheter	0	0	2	2	4
Sputum	0	1	1	0	2
Bronchial washing	0	0	0	2	2
Pleural fluid culture	1	0	0	0	1
Urethral discharge	1	0	0	0	1
Peritoneal fluid	1	0	0	0	1
Ear discharge	0	1	0	0	1
Stool	1	0	0	0	1
Total	27	24	26	23	100

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility to ticarcillin (75 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg) and ofloxacin (5 µg) (Mast, UK) was performed by employing the standard disk diffusion method. MICs of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (Sigma-Aldrich) were determined by the standard agar dilution assay. The results of disk diffusion assay as well as MIC were interpreted according to the clinical and laboratory standard institute (CLSI) guidelines.²⁵Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the control strain for susceptibility testing.

PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

Chromosomal DNA from the isolates of P. aeruginosa was extracted by DNA extraction kit (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The PCR reaction was performed in a 50 µL mixture containing 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 pmol of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran), 1U of Pfu DNA polymerase (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran), 1X Pfu DNA polymerase buffer and 10-100 ng of the template DNA.

The amplification of gyrA and parC genes was carried out using the polymerase chain reaction and specific primer sets as described previously.²⁶ Purified PCR products were sequenced using the Applied Biosystems 3730/3730xl DNA analyzers sequencing (ABI) system, (Bioneer Co., Korea).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were compared by the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test using SPSS 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A statistically significant difference was considered as a P-value < 0.05.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Of the 100 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, 71 of them were found to show multidrug resistance (MDR). MDR was defined as resistance to three or more unrelated antibiotics.²⁷ The highest rate of resistance was observed against ticarcillin (84%) and ofloxacin (82%). Moreover, the highest susceptibility rate was obtained against ceftazidime (45%), followed by gentamicin (44%). Of the total isolates, 64 (64%) were resistant, 2 (2%) were intermediate and 34 (34%) were observed to be susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Moreover, 63% of isolates were resistant, 1% were intermediate, and 36% were susceptible to levofloxacin.

DNA sequences analysis

DNA sequences of all P. aeruginosa isolates were compared with the corresponding sequences of P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Accession: NC_002516.2 GI: 110645304). Aside from ciprofloxacin susceptible, levofloxacin susceptible and ciprofloxacin intermediate isolates which had no amino acid alterations in their gyrA or parC genes, the amino acid alterations were recognized in gyrA and parC QRDR of 64 ciprofloxacin resistant, 63 levofloxacin resistant and 1 levofloxacin intermediate isolates, as described in Table 2. The total mutations found in these isolates were classified into 4 distinct groups according to the pattern of amino acid alteration. Group I: isolates contained single mutation Thr-83 → Ile in gyrA. Group II: isolates contained one mutation Thr-83 → Ile in gyrA and one mutation Ala-88 →Pro in parC. Group III: Isolates contained one mutation Thr-83 → Ile in gyrA and one mutation Ser-87 → Leu in parC. Group IV: isolates contained two mutations Thr-83 → Ile and Asp-87 → Asn in gyrA and one mutation Ser-87 → Leu in parC.

Table 2
Amino acid alterations in gyrA and parC in ciprofloxacin resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Groups	No. of isolates	Replacement in QRDR
		GyrA at position			ParC at position
		83	87		87	88
PAO1		Thr (ACC)	Asp (GAC)		Ser (TCG)	Ala (GCC)
I	20	Ile (ATC)	-		-	-
II	8	Ile (ATC)	-		-	Pro (CCC)
III	31	Ile (ATC)	-		Leu (TTG)	-
IV	5	Ile (ATC)	Asn (AAC)		Leu (TTG)	-

DNA sequences of QRDR gyrA showed Thr-83 → Ile substitution for all 64 ciprofloxacin resistant isolates. Of 64 isolates, 20 (31.25%) had a mutation (Thr-83 → Ile) in gyrA alone (group I). A double mutation in gyrA (Thr-83 → Ile and Asp-87 → Asn) was detected in 5 of 64 isolates. Amino acid alteration in the QRDR parC was observed in 44 (68.75%) of 64 isolates. All of these isolates possessed additional mutations in gyrA. No double mutations in parC were found. The Ser-87 → Leu substitution was found in 31 (48.4%) of 64 isolates. Moreover, the substitution of Pro for Ala-88 was observed in 8 (12.5%) of 64 isolates.

Correlation between fluoroquinolones MIC and QRDRs mutations

The MIC values of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for 64 resistant isolates and their correlation with different types of mutations in gyrA and parC genes are shown in Table 3. As shown, ciprofloxacin MIC for isolates with a single gyrA substitution (Thr-83 → Ile) ranged from 4-64 µg/mL and for levofloxacin, the 4-32 µg/mL range was observed. Isolates with a single gyrA (Thr-83 → Ile) substitution and a single parC substitution (Ala-88 → Pro or Ser-87 → Leu) had ciprofloxacin MICs ranging from 8 to 128 or 16 to 256 µg/mL and levofloxacin MICs varied from 8 to 64 or 8 to 256 µg/mL. Moreover, the isolates with double gyrA substitutions (Thr-83 → Ile and Asp-87 → Asn) and a single parC substitution (Ser-87 → Leu) had ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs ranging from 32 to 256 µg/mL. Our results showed that the two concurrent mutations in gyrA and parC genes were associated with a higher level of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs, as compared to a single mutation in gyrA. (Geometric mean MICs of ciprofloxacin, 29.34 (group 2) and 32 (group 3) versus 16.56 (group 1) µg/mL, p < 0.05; geometric mean MICs of levofloxacin, 24.67 (group 2) and 28.6 (group 3) versus 14.42 (group 1) µg/mL p < 0.05). Moreover, three concurrent mutations in gyrA and parC genes were associated with a higher level of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs, as compared to two concurrent mutations in gyrA and parC genes (Geometric mean MICs of ciprofloxacin, 73.5 (group 4) versus 29.3 (group 2) µg/mL, and 32 (group 3) µg/mL p < 0.05; geometric mean MICs of levofloxacin, 64 (group 4) versus 24.6 (group 2) and 28.61 (group 3) µg/mL p < 0.05) or single mutation in gyrA. (Geometric mean MICs of ciprofloxacin, 73.51 (group 4) versus 16.56 (group 1) µg/mL, p < 0.05; geometric mean MICs of levofloxacin, 64 (group 4) versus 14.42 (group 1) µg/mL p < 0.05).

Table 3
Correlation of mutations in gyrA and parC genes and MICs distribution of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin.

Group	No. of isolates	Antimicrobial agents	No. of isolates with MICs (µg/mL)
			0.5	1	2	4	8	16	32	64	128	256
I	20	Ciprofloxacin				2	2	10	5	1
GyrA (83)		Levofloxacin				1	4	12
II	8	Ciprofloxacin					1	1	5		1
GyrA (83), ParC (88)							1	3	2
III	31	Ciprofloxacin						12	11	5	2	1
GyrA (83), ParC (87)							4	8	12	4	2	1
IV	5	Ciprofloxacin							2	1	1	1
GyrA (83 and 87), ParC (87)									2	1

Discussion

Fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin are an important class of antibiotics for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections.²⁶ However, P. aeruginosa rapidly becomes resistant to these drugs during antibiotic therapy.¹⁵ The principle mechanism of fluoroquinolones resistance in P. aeruginosa involves mutations in the genes of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.¹⁸

In the present study, the alteration of Thr-83 to Ile in gyrA was found in all ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Moreover, a double concomitant mutation in gyrA (Thr-83 → Ile and Asp-87 → Asn) was observed in five ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistant isolates. More noteworthy, the MIC values of tested fluoroquinolones among these isolates were significantly higher. However, no amino acid change was detected in ciprofloxacin susceptible, levofloxacin susceptible and ciprofloxacin intermediate isolates. So Thr-83 → Ile was shown to be the chief mechanism of fluoroquinolones resistance. This was consistent with the results of other studies.^26,28-30 Furthermore, the amino acid sequences analysis in the QRDR of parC showed that more than half of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin resistant isolates had an alteration in parC and the Ser-87 → Leu substitution was the predominant amino acid change (48.4%). Lee et al.¹⁸ and Mouneimne et al.¹⁶ have previously reported this amino acid change in 35.9% and 25% of the ciprofloxacin resistant isolates, respectively. Also, another alteration in parC, Ala-88 → Pro substitution, was highly frequent in our isolates, in comparison to the results of Akasaka et al.,¹⁷ and Sekiguchi et al.³¹ They found this amino acid change only in one of all studied isolates. More importantly, this substitution was observed generally among high level ciprofloxacin resistant isolates suggested to be responsible for fluoroquinolone resistance. However, we did not detect amino acid alteration at positions Pro-83, Gly-85,³¹ Glu-91 and Leu-95¹⁷ in parC, as reported in the previous studies.

Based on the analysis of sequencing results, all of the isolates with parC mutation had one or two mutations in gyrA. This observation confirmed that the DNA gyrase was the primary target for fluoroquinolone resistance in the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. However, isolates that had double mutation in gyrA and parC had higher ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs than those with a single mutation in gyrA, thereby suggesting that alteration in parC occurred after gyrA, leading to higher level fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa. Moreover, the addition of a second gyrA alteration to gyrA and parC mutations had a significant effect on ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin MICs. Our results suggested that there could be a correlation between the number of gyrA and parC alterations and the level of fluoroquinolone resistance. This has been reported by Lee et al.¹⁸ for the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. Differences in the MICs of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for isolates had a single alteration in QRDR of gyrA with or without an alteration in QRDR of parC, revealing that other resistance factors were involved in fluoroquinolone resistance. Mechanisms such as overexpression of efflux pumps (MexAB-OprM^32,33 MexCD-OprJ,²⁸ MexEF-OprN²¹ and MexXY-OprM³⁴) and mutation in gyrB and parE have been described for fluoroquinolone resistance in P. aeruginosa.^17,18 However, the impact of these mechanisms on MICs of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin can be clarified by further studies.

To conclude, mechanisms other than mutations in gyrA and parC (such as active efflux pumps, alterations in gyrB, parE or innate impermeability of the membrane) may contribute to the level of fluoroquinolone resistance in the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, but a single amino acid alteration, Thr-83 → Ile, in gyrA, is sufficient to cause clinically important levels of resistance to fluoroquinolones, and the simultaneous presence of mutation in parC (Ser-87 → Leu or Ala-88 → Pro) mediates significantly higher level fluoroquinolone resistance.

Finally, our results revealed that the mutations in gyrA and parC were the main mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance among the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in Tabriz, Iran. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest analysis of the QRDR of gyrA and parC in the clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from Iran.

Acknowledgment

This work was fully supported by Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center (grant No. 93-02), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. It is also a report orginiating from a database developed for the thesis of first author registered in Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. The authors also thank Dr. Hossein Samadi Kafil for his kind help in analyzing sequencing results, and Mrs. Maryam Rasoli and Mr. Jaber Kamran for collecting the clinical isolates.

References

• ¹
  Ahangarzadeh Rezaee M, Behzadiannezhad Q, Najjar-Pirayeh S, Oulia P. In vitro activity of imipenem and ceftazidime against mucoid and non-mucoid strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients in Iran. Arch Iran Med 2002;5:251-254.
• ²
  Lihua L, Jianhuit W, Jialini Y, Yayin L, Guanxin L. Effects of allicin on the formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofinm and the production of quorum-sensing controlled virulence factors. Pol J Microbiol 2013;62:243-251.
• ³
  Wolska K, Szweda P. Genetic features of clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Pol J Microbiol 2009;58:255-260.
• ⁴
  Ahangarzadeh Rezaee M, Behzadiannezhad Q, Najjar PS, Oulia P. Higher aminoglycoside resistance in mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa than in non-mucoid strains. Arch Iranian Med 2002;5:108-110.
• ⁵
  Oliveira ACd, Maluta RP, Stella AE, Rigobelo EC, Marin JM, Ávila FAd. Isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from dental office environments and units in Barretos, state of São Paulo, Brazil, and analysis of their susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs. Braz J Microbiol 2008;39:579-584.
• ⁶
  Wolska K, Kot B, Jakubczak A. Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from hospitals in Siedlce (Poland). Braz J Microbiol 2012;43:274-282.
• ⁷
  Perez LRR, Limberger MF, Costi R, Dias CAG, Barth AL. Evaluation of tests to predict metallo-β-lactamase in cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-(CF) Pseudomonas Braz J Microbiol 2014;45:835-839.
• ⁸
  Strateva T, Yordanov D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa - a phenomenon of bacterial resistance. J Med Microbiol 2009;58:1133-1148.
• ⁹
  Kugelberg E, Löfmark S, Wretlind B, Andersson DI. Reduction of the fitness burden of quinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:22-30.
• ¹⁰
  Llanes C, Köhler T, Patry I, Dehecq B, Van Delden C, Plésiat P. Role of the efflux system MexEF-OprN in low level resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:5676-5684.
• ¹¹
  Dalhoff A. Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implications for clinical use. Interdisc Perspect Infect Dis 2012:1-37.
• ¹²
  Wydmuch Z, Skowronek-Ciolek O, Cholewa K, Mazurek U, Pacha J, Kepa M. gyrA mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Silesian Hospital in Poland. Pol J Microbiol 2005;54:201-206.
• ¹³
  Akasaka T, Onodera Y, Tanaka M, Sato K. Cloning, expression, and enzymatic characterization of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa topoisomerase IV. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:530-536.
• ¹⁴
  Agnello M, Wong-Beringer A. Differentiation in quinolone resistance by virulence genotype in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PLoS ONE 2012;7:e42973.
• ¹⁵
  Jalal S, Ciofu O, Høiby N, Gotoh N, Wretlind B. Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:710-712.
• ¹⁶
  Mouneimné H, Robert J, Jarlier V, Cambau E. Type II topoisomerase mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:62-66.
• ¹⁷
  Akasaka T, Tanaka M, Yamaguchi A, Sato K. Type II topoisomerase mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in 1998 and 1999: role of target enzyme in mechanism of fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:2263-2268.
• ¹⁸
  Lee JK, Lee YS, Park YK, Kim BS. Alterations in the GyrA and GyrB subunits of topoisomerase II and the ParC and ParE subunits of topoisomerase IV in ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Int J Antimicrob Agents 2005;25:290-295.
• ¹⁹
  Nakano M, Deguchi T, Kawamura T, Yasuda M, Kimura M, Okano Y. Mutations in the gyrA and parC genes in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:2289-2291.
• ²⁰
  Salma R, Dabboussi F, Kassaa I, Khudary R, Hamze M. gyrA and parC mutations in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Nini Hospital in north Lebanon. J Infect Chemother 2013;19:77-81.
• ²¹
  Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009;22:582-610.
• ²²
  Japoni A, Farshad S, Alborzi A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: burn infection, treatment and antibacterial resistance. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2009;2009:244-253.
• ²³
  Ranjbar R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Mansouri S, Jonaidi-Jafari N, Izadi M. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from burned patients hospitalized in a major burn center in Tehran, Iran. Acta Med Iran 2011;49:675-679.
• ²⁴
  Hall GS. Nonfermenting and miscellaneous gram-negative bacilli. In: Mahon CR, Leman DC, Manyselis G, eds. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology 3th ed. Ohio: Saunders-Elsevier; 2007:564–585.
• ²⁵
  Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). PerformanceStandards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Document Approved Standard M100-S20 PA, USA: Wayne; 2010.
• ²⁶
  Gorgani N, Ahlbrand S, Patterson A, Pourmand N. Detection of point mutations associated with antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Int J Antimicrob Agents 2009;34:414-418.
• ²⁷
  Ahangarzadeh Rezaee M, Sheikhalizadeh V, Hasani A. Detection of integrons among multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli strains isolated from clinical specimens in northern west of Iran. Braz J Microbiol 2011;42:1308-1313.
• ²⁸
  Higgins P, Fluit A, Milatovic D, Verhoef J, Schmitz F-J. Mutations in GyrA, ParC, MexR and NfxB in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Int J Antimicrob Agents 2003;21:409-413.
• ²⁹
  Kureishi A, Diver JM, Beckthold B, Schollaardt T, Bryan LE. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa DNA gyrase gyrA gene from strain PAO1 and quinolone-resistant clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38:1944-1952.
• ³⁰
  Takenouchi T, Sakagawa E, Sugawara M. Detection of gyrA mutations among 335 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated in Japan and their susceptibilities to fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:406-409.
• ³¹
  Sekiguchi J-I, Asagi T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, et al. Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in community hospitals in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:979-989.
• ³²
  Lambert P. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa J R Soc Med 2002;95:22-26.
• ³³
  Poole K. Efflux-mediated resistance to fluoroquinolones in gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:2233-2241.
• ³⁴
  Van Bambeke F, Glupczynski Y, Plesiat P, Pechere J, Tulkens PM. Antibiotic efflux pumps in prokaryotic cells: occurrence, impact on resistance and strategies for the future of antimicrobial therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:1055-1065.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Oct-Dec 2016

History

• Received
  15 July 2015
• Accepted
  25 Mar 2016