The virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae partially depends on dprA

Abstract

Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the most frequent opportunistic pathogens worldwide. DNA processing protein A (DprA) is an important factor involved in bacterial uptake and DNA integration into bacterial genome, but its role in S. pneumoniae virulence remains unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of the pneumococcal dprA gene on the pathogenesis of S. pneumoniae. To construct a dprA-deficient pneumococcal strain, the dprA gene of the S. pneumoniae strain D39 was inactivated. The virulence of this dprA-deficient strain, designated ΔD39, was compared with that of the wild-type strain by evaluating their respective capabilities to adhere to human pulmonary epithelial cells (PEC-A549) and by analyzing their choline-binding protein expression levels. In addition, the expression profiles of genes associated with virulence and host survival assays were also conducted with the mutant and the wild-type strain. Our results indicate that the capability of ΔD39 to adhere to the PEC-A549 airway cells was significantly lower (p < 0.01) compared with D39. Additionally, the 100-KD choline-binding protein was not detected in ΔD39. The addition of competence-stimulating peptide (CSP) lead to a significantly reduction of psaA mRNA expression in the dprA-deficient mutant and an increased level of psaA transcripts in the wild-type strain (p < 0.01). The median survival time of mice intraperitoneally infected with ΔD39 was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that of mice infected with D39. The results of this study suggest that DprA has a significant effect on virulence characteristics of S. pneumoniae by influencing the expression of choline-binding protein and PsaA.

Keywords:
Streptococcus pneumoniae; DprA; Transformation; Virulence

Introduction

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic, alpha-hemolytic streptococci. This pathogenic bacteria is widely found throughout nature and can cause different types infections, such as bronchitis, rhinitis, acute sinusitis, otitis media, conjunctivitis, meningitis, bacteremia, sepsis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, endocarditis, peritonitis, pericarditis, cellulitis, and brain abscess.¹ Due to the rapid increase of drug-resistant bacteria, the curative effect of antibiotics is declining.² To find new ways of treating pneumococcal infections, new virulence genes need to be identified and the molecular mechanisms of pneumococcal virulence and drug resistance should equally be thoroughly investigated.

One of the remarkable features of S. pneumoniae is their natural capability to undergo genetic transformation. This mechanism of DNA uptake may result in important changes in the bacterial genetic background, which may lead to the emergence of bacterial subpopulations carrying different genetic traits in relation to the parental generation.³ When S. pneumoniae enter in the competent state, the autolysin-considered an important S. pneumoniae virulence factor-is activated. As consequence, S. pneumoniae release cell-wall fragments and hemolysin.⁴ Another study demonstrated that the virulence of S. pneumoniae may significantly decrease after mutations in some of their protein genes.⁵ All together, these data suggest that transformation can directly influence the virulence of S. pneumoniae.

Natural transformation in S. pneumoniae is a complex process that requires at least 23 genes. To integrate new DNA into the genome, a bacterium must enter in a special competent state for binding, taking up, and recombining exogenous DNA. In S. pneumoniae, competence is induced by DNA-damaging agents such as mitomycin C, topoisomerase inhibitors, and the fluoroquinolone antibiotics norfloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Transformation protects S. pneumoniae against the bactericidal effect of DNA-damaging agents.⁶ Additionally, the induction of competence in S. pneumoniae was associated with increased resistance to oxidative stress and upregulation of RecA protein, which plays a key role in removing DNA damage.⁷

In S. pneumonia, the ubiquitous recombinases, RecA and DprA are required for DNA integration into the bacterial genome.⁸ RecA plays important roles in the homologous recombination pathway, catalyzing DNA strand invasion and homology search.⁴ DprA was reported to be involved in binding to the internalized single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and promoting the loading of RecA on ssDNA during natural transformation.⁹ The inactivation of dprA results in >10⁴-fold reduction in transformation.¹⁰ DNA internalized in dprA-deficient competent cells appears to be completely destroyed,¹⁰ suggesting that DprA plays a prominent role in protecting incoming ssDNA from nuclease(s). DprA can also repress the early expression of competence genes-by interacting with ComE during competence regulation-but does not affect proteolysis of labile early gene products.¹¹

Despite the knowledge about the involvement of DprA in the bacterial DNA uptake and integration, the specific mechanism by which DprA influences the virulence of S. pneumoniae remains unclear. Choline-binding proteins (CBPs), pneumolysin (Ply), capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis locus (Cps2A), and pneumococcal surface protein A (PsaA) are factors associated with the virulence of S. pneumonia.^12,13 To further explore the role of DprA in S. pneumoniae virulence, a dprA-deficient mutant was constructed, and the influence of DprA on S. pneumoniae virulence was investigated by assessing adherence rates, the expression levels of virulence associated genes, and mice survival after infections with the isogenic dprA-deficient mutant and the wild-type strain of S. pneumoniae.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The wild-type S. pneumoniae strain used in this study was D39, which is a virulent encapsulated type 2 S. pneumoniae strain obtained from the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products of China. The S. pneumoniae cells were grown at 37 °C in 5% CO₂ in THY medium containing (per liter) 36.4 g of Todd-Hewitt broth and 5.0 g of yeast extract. Kanamycin was added to the growth medium at a concentration of 350 µg/mL for the selection of pneumococcal transformants.

Escherichia coli DH5α cells (stored in our lab) were grown on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar or broth. pGEM-Teasy vector based plasmid were introduced into E. coli by transformation as previously described by Hanahan.¹⁴ For the selection of E. coli transformants, ampicillin (100 µg/mL) was added to the growth medium.

For the determination of growth curves, S. pneumoniae cells were grown in THY medium to an OD₆₂₀ of 0.4, and the culture fluid was subsequently diluted to an OD₆₂₀ of 0.01. The OD₆₂₀ value was determined each 30 min, and a growth curve was plotted.

Construction of a partial deleted-dprA mutant

To create a mutation in the dprA gene in S. pneumoniae, a 1351-bp Juat cassette was amplified with Juat1 (5′-ATTGGCGCGCCACCGTTTGATTTTTAATGGATAATG-3′) and Juat2 (5′-ATTGGCCGGCCCCTTTCCTTATGCTTTTGGAC-3′) from kanamycin-resistant E. coli chromosomal DNA and used to disrupt dprA. A 1111-bp fragment (dprA up) containing part of dprA was amplified with dap1 (5′-CGCGAGCTCGAAAAATCCTCTACTCTACTAATCCAC-3′) and dap3 (5′-ATTGGCCGGCCAGATTCCAACATCTGACAAAATAG-3′) from S. pneumoniae DNA. An 872-bp fragment (dprA down) containing part of both the downstream dprA sequence and licC was amplified with dap2 (5′-ATTGGCGCGCCGCTTTCACACGAATCTCCTTTATT-3′) and dap4 (5′-TCCCCGCGGTTTTCTGGGGCTTGGGTCTA-3′) from S. pneumoniae DNA. The resulting three PCR products were digested using restriction enzymes (FseI, AscI) known to cut at the corresponding sites within the primers, and the digested products were ligated together into a pGEM-T vector (Promega, USA). The pGEM-T target vector was subsequently introduced into S. pneumoniae D39 by transformation, and recipient bacteria that had successfully integrated the recombinant fragment into their chromosomes by homologous recombination were selected by their resistance to kanamycin. Primers dap1 and dap4 were used to screen for the appropriate deletion, and the resulting PCR products were confirmed by sequencing. S. pneumoniae containing the correct deletion within dprA was named ΔD39 and was used for further studies.

Adherence of the wild-type and dprA-deficient S. pneumoniae strains to PEC-A549 airway cells

The capability of the dprA-deficient mutant to adhere to the human pulmonary epithelial cell line, PEC-A549 (Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, China) was assessed in 12-well tissue culture plates. The PEC-A549 cells were cultured in DMEM/Ham's F-12 medium (pH 7.5) with 5% fetal calf serum for 2–3 days. The PEC-A549 cell monolayers were then rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and S. pneumoniae cells suspended in DMEM-Ham's F-12 medium (2.0 × 10⁷ CFU/mL; 1 mL/well) were added to the cells on 12-well plates. After 1 h-incubation at 37 °C, the PEC-A549 cells were washed five times with PBS (pH 7.5) to remove any remaining non-adherent bacteria. The mixture (epithelial and bacterial cells) was treated with 0.25% trypsin with 0.02% EDTA (200 µl/well) at 37 °C for 5 min. After, 400 µl of 0.025% cold TritonX-100 was added and the mixture was repeatedly pipetted to lyse the epithelial cells. The mixture was diluted with PBS, and 100 µl of trypticase soy agar plates containing 5% defibrinated sheep serum were inoculated into each well. The bacterial cells were cultured for 16 h and the number of bacterial colonies counted. Adherence was determined by dividing the number of adherent bacteria per 100 epithelial cells. The values reflect averages of four wells from independent experiments.

Real-time RT-PCR

To investigate if dprA plays a role in the expression of some important virulence genes during bacterial transformation, both the wild-type (D39) strain and dprA-deficient (ΔD39) pneumococcal mutant (grown at a pH of 8.0) were induced for competence by adding competence-stimulating peptide (CSP; 20 ng/mL) at the optimal bacterial cell density (OD₅₅₀ of 0.1) to induce competence. For the real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (real time RT-qPCR) analysis, the bacteria were collected at 0 and 20 min intervals after the addition of CSP to the culture.

Total RNA was obtained using the hot acid phenol method as previously described.¹⁵ Levels of mRNA for pneumolysin (ply), psaA, cbpA, and cps2A genes were quantified by one-step real-time RT-PCR with the Takara SYBR RT-PCR system (Takara Bio). The specific primers used for the real time qRT-PCR assays have been previously described elsewhere¹⁶ and were used at a final concentration of 100 nM per reaction. Specific primers for the 16 S rRNA were included as an internal control. The real-time qPCR was performed in an ABI7500 Real-Time cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA). The RT-PCR cycling conditions were set as instructed by the manual for the Takara SYBR RT-PCR system. Amplification data were acquired at the extension step and analyzed using the ABI Software version 2.0 with comparative critical threshold values. The ΔΔCt calculation for the relative quantification of target was used as follows ΔΔCt = (Ct, target gene – Ct, 16S rRNA)χ – (Ct, target gene – Ct, 16S rRNA)y, where χ = S. pneumoniae strain ΔD39 with and without CSP and y = S. pneumoniae strain D39 with and without CSP. After validation of the method, results for each sample were expressed in N-fold changes in χ target gene copies, normalized to 16S rRNA relative to the copy number of the target gene, according to the following equation: amount of target = 2-ΔΔCt.¹⁷ All experiments were carried out in quadruplicate.

Analysis of choline-binding proteins (CBPs) expression

For CBPs analysis experiments, wild-type (D39) and dprA-deficient (ΔD39) S. pneumoniae isogenic cells were grown in HYT medium to an OD₆₂₀ of 0.6, centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min, and washed twice with PBS. The cells were then harvested, resuspended in a PBS solution containing 2% choline chloride at 10¹⁰ cells/mL and equilibrated for 20 min at room temperature. The cells were subsequently centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min, and resuspended in 100 mL of TBS. The cell suspension was subjected to ultrasonication with 15 5-second pulses with 10-second intervals between pulses at 400W (Misonix XL2020, Farmingdale, NY) on ice. SDS-PAGE (12% polyacrylamide gel) was carried out as previously described by Laemmli,¹⁸ and the proteins in the gel were visualized by performing Coomassie brilliant blue staining.

Virulence studies

Intraperitoneal challenge with a highly virulent strain of S. pneumoniae (D39) or its isogenic dprA-deficient mutant (ΔD39) was performed to evaluate the role of dprA on S. pneumoniae virulence. Male 6- to 8-week-old BALB/c mice weighing 18–22 g were used in this experiment. Inoculation of the mice with pneumococci was conducted according to the previously described procedure.¹³ The wild-type strain and dprA mutant were tested in two separate experiments, involving each a total of 21 mice. To assess S. pneumoniae virulence in blood, the BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.1 mL of 5 × 10⁶ CFU/mL of a suspension of pneumococcal cells. The numbers of surviving animals were then recorded daily for 14 days. All experimental procedures were conformed with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China (No PLAGH2014078).

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student's t-tests. Data are presented as means ± the standard deviation of the mean for four independent experiments. Differences in the mean survival time between groups were analyzed using two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

Construction and growth rate of the dprA mutant strain (ΔD39)

For the construction of the dprA mutant, a DNA fragment containing a Juat cassette insertion was amplified by PCR and incorporated into the chromosome by transformation as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 1). The construction of the mutant was confirmed by PCR demonstrating the absence of the dprA segment. The growth rate of dprA mutant at 37 °C was similar to that of the parental strain D39, with a doubling time of 55 min, compared with about 54 min for D39 (Fig. 2). Thus, dprA does not seem to be essential for the growth of S. pneumoniae at 37 °C.

Fig. 1
Mutated region of dprA. A schematic of the dprA mutation that was created by the insertion of a 1351-bp Juat cassette.

Fig. 2
Growth curves of S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39. Growth curves of S. pneumoniae wild-type (D39) strain and dprA-insertional (ΔD39) mutant. Data are representative of four independent experiments.

Effect of a dprA mutation on the S. pneumoniae adherence rate

The effect of the dprA gene on the adherence rate of S. pneumoniae strain D39 was determined by comparing the capability of the wild-type strain D39 and the isogenic dprA mutant (ΔD39) to adhere to pulmonary epithelial cell line PEC-A549 in vitro. In comparison with D39, the adherence rate of ΔD39 to PEC-A549 cells was significantly lower (p < 0.01). Specifically, the adherence rate of ΔD39 was only 30% of the adherence rate achieved by the parent strain, D39 (Fig. 3). This result suggests that dprA plays an important role in the adherence of S. pneumoniae to host cells.

Fig. 3
Adherence of S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39 to PEC-A549 cells. Adherence was expressed as the number of pneumococci attached per 100 PEC-A549 cells.

Effect of dprA mutation on the expression of choline-binding proteins (CBPs)

CBPs are major S. pneumoniae virulence factors that exist on the bacterial surface. Changes in CBPs expression can influence the adherence rate and virulence of S. pneumoniae. Unlike the observed for the wild-type strain,^12,13 we did not detect the 100-KD CBP in the dprA mutant (Fig. 4). This result suggests that the expression of CBPs seems to be dependent on the expression of the dprA gene.

Fig. 4
Detection of choline-binding proteins (CBPs) in S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39. A representative SDS-PAGE gel of the corresponding cell lysis products is shown. Left to right: slot M, protein molecular weight marker; slot 1, D39; slot 2, ΔD39. Arrow indicates the choline-binding proteins (CBPs) band.

Modulation of the expression of virulence-associated factors by CSP-induced competence

Competence, induced by CSP, can affect the expression of virulence factors.¹⁹ Thus, the modulation of virulence gene expression was examined at the mRNA level in the wild-type S. pneumoniae strain and in the dprA-mutant. The mRNA levels of ply, cbpA, psaA, and the capsule synthesis gene cps2A were determined by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
Relative quantity of cbpA, cps2A, ply, and psaA mRNA in S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39 with and without CSP. Real-time qRT-PCR was performed to assess the relative mRNA concentrations of cbpA (A), cps2A (B), ply (C), and psaA (D) in S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39 in the absence or presence of CSP. The levels of individual mRNA species were normalized using as reference the internal control (16S rRNA). ** p < 0.01, NS = no significance.

The baseline expression levels of cbpA, cps2A, and psaA were lower in ΔD39 than in D39 (p < 0.01), but the baseline expression levels of ply were not statistically different between the wild-type and the isogenic dprA mutant. Following the addition of CSP, the relative cbpA mRNA level increased 7.15-fold (p < 0.01) in D39, but the level of cbpA expression only increased 2.1-fold (p < 0.01) in the dprA mutant (Fig. 5A). Additionally, the mRNA levels of ply were increased 5.83- and 5.4-fold in D39 and the dprA mutant, respectively, after CSP was added (both p < 0.01) (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, expression of cps2A in the dprA mutant was significantly decreased following CSP addition (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5B). The expression of psaA was significantly increased (p < 0.01) in D39 after CSP was added. In contrast, CSP treatment decreased the mRNA level of psaA by 1.8-fold in the dprA mutant (p < 0.01) (Fig. 5D). Together, our results suggest that the dprA mutation may negatively affect the expression of psaA.

Effect of a dprA mutation on S. pneumoniae virulence

To further investigate the effect of the dprA mutation on the virulence of S. pneumoniae, the survival time of mice after intraperitoneal infection with approximately 10⁵ CFU of D39 or ΔD39 pneumococci was measured. The median survival time (36 h) for mice infected with the parental strain (D39) was significantly lower than that (44 h) for mice infected with the dprA mutant (Fig. 6), as was the overall survival rate (p < 0.01). This result indicates that dprA function is critical for virulence factor expression in S. pneumoniae.

Fig. 6
Intraperitoneal challenge with S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39. Groups of BALB/c mice were intraperitoneally injected with 5 × 100 CFU of S. pneumoniae strains D39 and ΔD39. The survival time of each of the mice is indicated (p value < 0.01). Transverse lines denote median survival times for each of the groups.

Discussion

CPBs are proteins that were previously associated with cell lysis²⁰ and contain a number of short choline-binding repeats that anchor them non-covalently to teichoic and lipoteichoic acids in the pneumococcal cell wall.²¹ We found that S. pneumoniae cells with mutated dprA lack 100-KD CBPs, suggesting that dprA plays a key role in CBPs expression and thus might influence the CBPs competence-induced cell lysis. However, further studies are needed to precisely determine the protein(s) affected and the correspondent mechanisms.

Our results also demonstrated that the adherence to PEC-A549 cells of pneumococcal strain D39 was reduced by mutation in dprA. Because PspA, PspC, CbpA are associated with bacterial adherence to host cells,^22–24 it seems logical to examine the relationship between dprA and these proteins. Here, we assessed the expressions of cbpA, cps2A, and psaA in the S. pneumoniae D39 strain and in the isogenic dprA mutant by real-time qRT-PCR. Our data demonstrate that the ΔdprA has lower levels of cbpA, cps2A, and psaA expression compared with the parental wild-type strain.

After CSP was added to induce competence, the expression level of cps2A, which is the first gene in the capsule biosynthesis locus, was reduced in both the wild-type strain and the dprA mutant, what might result in a potentially lower resistance to the host immune system.²⁵ However, the expression level of cps2A in the dprA mutant was lower than that of wild-type strain, which may probably has some consequence for the bacterial virulence. In the presence of CSP, the expression level of cbpA increased in both wild-type and dprA mutant, but the expression level of cbpA in the dprA mutant was much lower compared with the wild type. This result seems to indicate that dprA upregulates cbpA mainly during the competence state.

Notably, the expression of psaA was increased in the D39 following the addition of CSP, but it was decreased in the dprA mutant, suggesting that dprA plays an important role in the regulation of psaA expression. Therefore, virulence gene regulation might be modulated by DprA. Previous studies have shown that the combination of low virulence with high resistance to host immune cells may lead to the establishment of chronic bacteremia, in which the bacteria are able to evade the host immune system and survive in the host but are unable to cause fulminant disease, a phenomenon that has been previously demonstrated in a pneumolysin-negative mutant of S. pneumoniae strain R6.^4,5 Although we did not test that hypothesis, it is possible that the dprA mutant might exhibit a wild-type level of resistance to host macrophages upon stress challenge, even though the overall virulence was decreased.

In fact, the mouse infection model indicates that mutation in dprA can significantly attenuate the virulence of a pneumococcal strain. This seems to suggest that factors related with competence and transformation mechanisms are possibly linked with pathogenic process of S. pneumoniae. However, this connection also appear to rely, at least in part, on the genetic background of the bacterium. For example, the virulence of another pneumococcal strain was reduced by approximately 8000-fold in a systemic infection model with a comD gene mutant compared with the isogenic wild-type strain.⁵ Whether or not these factors are categorically involved in competence and transformation is a matter that requires further investigation.

In summary, DprA is an essential recombination-mediated protein that is involved in the natural transformation of S. pneumoniae. This protein mainly protects the intracellular plasmid or DNA that were taken up by the bacteria from degradation by DNase. Here, we report that a dprA mutation leads to a decreased virulence of S. pneumoniae that was paralleled by the absence of CBPs. Because natural transformation is closely correlated with the emergence of drug resistance, the finds that dprA participates in both transformation and virulence suggests that DprA may be an effective target for inhibiting drug resistance and reducing S. pneumoniae virulence.

• 1
  These authors contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2014CB744400), National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for "Significant New Drugs Development" (grant no. 2015ZX09J15102-003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81402471) and Basic Research Program of General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces (grant no. WZ2014026).

References

• ¹
  Siemieniuk RA, Gregson DB, Gill MJ. The persisting burden of invasive pneumococcal disease in HIV patients: an observational cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11:314.
• ²
  Kim L, McGee L, Tomczyk S, Beall B. Biological and epidemiological features of antibiotic-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in pre- and post-conjugate vaccine eras: a United States perspective. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:525-552.
• ³
  Lin J, Zhu L, Lau GW. Disentangling competence for genetic transformation and virulence in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Curr Genet. 2016;62:97-103.
• ⁴
  Mortier-Barriere I, de Saizieu A, Claverys JP, Martin B. Competence-specific induction of recA is required for full recombination proficiency during transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 1998;27:159-170.
• ⁵
  Bartilson M, Marra A, Christine J, Asundi JS, Schneider WP, Hromockyj AE. Differential fluorescence induction reveals Streptococcus pneumoniae loci regulated by competence stimulatory peptide. Mol Microbiol. 2001;39:126-135.
• ⁶
  Engelmoer DJ, Rozen DE. Competence increases survival during stress in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Evolution 2011;65:3475-3485.
• ⁷
  Michod RE, Bernstein H, Nedelcu AM. Adaptive value of sex in microbial pathogens. Infect Genet Evol 2008;8:267-285.
• ⁸
  Chen I, Dubnau D. DNA uptake during bacterial transformation. Nat Rev Microbiol 2004;2:241-249.
• ⁹
  Lisboa J, Andreani J, Sanchez D, et al. Molecular determinants of the DprA–RecA interaction for nucleation on ssDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:7395-7408.
• ¹⁰
  Berge M, Mortier-Barriere I, Martin B, Claverys JP. Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae relies on DprA- and RecA-dependent protection of incoming DNA single strands. Mol Microbiol 2003;50:527-536.
• ¹¹
  Yadav T, Carrasco B, Serrano E, Alonso JC. Roles of Bacillus subtilis DprA and SsbA in RecA-mediated genetic recombination. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:27640-27652.
• ¹²
  Arunasri K, Adil M, Charan KV, Suvro C, Reddy SH, Shivaji S. Effect of simulated microgravity on E. coli K12 MG1655 growth and gene expression. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57860.
• ¹³
  Polissi A, Pontiggia A, Feger G, et al. Large-scale identification of virulence genes from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 1998;66:5620-5629.
• ¹⁴
  Hanahan D. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol. 1983;166:557-580.
• ¹⁵
  Holmes A, Birse L, Jackson RW, Holden NJ. An optimized method for the extraction of bacterial mRNA from plant roots infected with Escherichia coli O157:H7. Front Microbiol 2014;5:286.
• ¹⁶
  Kwon HY, Kim SW, Choi MH, et al. Effect of heat shock and mutations in ClpL and ClpP on virulence gene expression in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 2003;71:3757-3765.
• ¹⁷
  Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402-408.
• ¹⁸
  Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680-685.
• ¹⁹
  Zhang XM, Yin YB, Zhu D, et al. The effect of transformation on the virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Microbiol. 2005;43:337-344.
• ²⁰
  Kausmally L, Johnsborg O, Lunde M, Knutsen E, Havarstein LS. Choline-binding protein D (CbpD) in Streptococcus pneumoniae is essential for competence-induced cell lysis. J Bacteriol 2005;187:4338-4345.
• ²¹
  Weng L, Piotrowski A, Morrison DA. Exit from competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae is regulated at multiple levels. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64197.
• ²²
  Balachandran P, Brooks-Walter A, Virolainen-Julkunen A, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE. Role of pneumococcal surface protein C in nasopharyngeal carriage and pneumonia and its ability to elicit protection against carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun 2002;70:2526-2534.
• ²³
  Hammerschmidt S, Talay SR, Brandtzaeg P, Chhatwal GS. SpsA, a novel pneumococcal surface protein with specific binding to secretory immunoglobulin A and secretory component. Mol Microbiol 1997;25:1113-1124.
• ²⁴
  Rosenow C, Ryan P, Weiser JN, et al. Contribution of novel choline-binding proteins to adherence, colonization and immunogenicity of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol Microbiol 1997;25:819-829.
• ²⁵
  Zhu L, Lau GW. Therapeutic potential of the Streptococcus pneumoniae competence regulon. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013;11:227-229.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr-Jun 2017

History

• Received
  5 Mar 2016
• Accepted
  5 Oct 2016