Print version ISSN 1517-8692
Rev Bras Med Esporte vol.10 no.2 Niterói Mar./Apr. 2004
Muscular strength of 9-18-year old volleyball athletes through computational dynamometry*
Fuerza muscular de atletas de voleibol de 9 a 18 años a través de la dinamometria computarizada
Patrícia SchneiderI; Gisele BenettiII; Flávia MeyerIII
IGraduated in Physical Education by
the Rio Grande do Sul Federal University. Currently on the Master Degree Course
on Human Movement Sciences in the Rio Grande do Sul Federal University
IIGraduated in Physical Education by the Rio Grande do Sul Federal University
IIIPediatric Physician. Professor at the Physical Education School from the Rio Grande do Sul Federal University. Doctorate Degree from the McMaster University, Canadá
The objective of this work was to describe and to compare the isometric and isokinetic muscular strength at different maturational degree of boys and girls volleyball athletes. 66 healthy children and youth participated in the study in a competitive sportive training. From the 37 boys, 10 were prepubescent (PP), 15 pubescent (PU) and 12 postpubescent (PO). From the girls, 11 were PP, 13 PU and 5 PO. A computational dynamometer (Cybex Norm) was used to measure the isokinetic strength of the elbow flexion (FC) and the knee extension (EJ) at speeds of 60 and 90º.s-1. The isometric strength was measured in the same exercises at angles of 60 and 90º (FC), and 45 and 60º (EJ). The analysis of variance ANOVA and the post hoc Tuckey test were used for the comparisons between gender and maturational degrees. The significance level was considered as p < 0.05. Among the maturational degrees, the older groups were always stronger than the younger groups for both genders. Among genders, the boys were stronger than girls only for group PO, at both angles of the isometric test of FC and in the isokinetic test at 90º.s-1. In the isometric tests of EJ, the values were not significantly different for boys and girls, regardless the maturational degree. In the isokinetic tests, the boys were stronger than girls in groups PP and PO, at 60 and 90º.s-1. These results suggest that the maturational degree is more determinant of muscular strength of volleyball young athletes than the gender.
Key words: Child. Youth. Sports. Anthropometric evaluation.
El objetivo de este estudio fué describir y comparar las fuerzas musculares isométrica e isocinética en diferentes grados maduracionales de niños y niñas atletas de voleibol. Participó del estudio un total de 66 niños y adolescentes, en tratamiento deportivo competitivo. De los 37 niños, 10 eran pre-púberes (PP), 15 púberes (PU) y 12 post-púberes (PO). De las 29 niñas, 11 eran PP, 13 PU e 5 PO. Fué utilizado un dinamómetro computarizado (Cybex Norm) para medir la fuerza isocinética de flexión de codo (FC) y extensión de rodilla (EJ) en las velocidades de 60 y 90º.s-1. La fuerza isométrica fue medida en los mismos ejercicios en los ángulos de 60 y 90º (FC), y 45 y 60º (EJ). Se utilizó la ANOVA para comparaciones entre los géneros y grados maduracionales y el test post hoc de Tuckey. El nivel de significancia considerado fue de p < 0,05. Entre los grados maduracionales los grupos mas viejos fueron siempre mas fuertes que los de los mas jovenes tanto para el género masculino como para el femenino. Entre los sexos, los niños fueron mas fuertes que las niñas apenas en el grupo PO en los dos ángulos de los tests isométricos de FC y en el test isocinético en 90ºs-1. En los tests isométricos de EJ los valores no fueron significativamente diferentes para niños y niñas independientemente do grado de maturación. En los test isocinéticos, los niños fueron más fuertes que las niñas en los grupos PP e PO, en 60 e 90º.s-1. Esos resultados sugieren que el grado maturacional es un mayor determinante de la fuerza muscular en jóvenes atletas de voleibol que el sexo.
Palabras-clave: Niños. Adolescente. Deporte. Evaluación antropométrica.
The muscular strength may both reflect the health status and to predict the performance for a given sportive modality. Also for children and youth, this component has been emphasized, reflecting the large number of studies on the trainability of strength in children(1).
The muscular strength is important in many sports(2-5) and, specifically in volleyball, it is widely used(2,5-7). Volleyball is a sportive modality that requires power in the upper members (especially shoulders), lower members (jumps) and trunk, besides aerobic conditioning in order to stay in a game that could last for as long as three hours(8). The improvement of these abilities is quite important for a volleyball player, being the muscular strength many times the priority for the young athlete(8).
The muscular strength in the lower members is indispensable in volleyball, once without it the athlete runs the risk of lesions and low power jumps. Also due to the hundreds of jumps, the ligaments and the connective tissue may be injured, as well as the articulations, especially the knees. With regard to the upper members, the strength seems to be determinant for the team performance(5).
The muscular strength is important for the basic training of the volleyball athlete due to the future training overload and to the lesion prevention. Although traumatic lesions such as bone fractures and dislocations are not usual, there are a large number of lesions by overload due to jumps, attack jumps and defense jumps ("little fish"). These microlesions may lead to chronic problems that could last for the lifetime of athletes; thus, a training adequate program to reduce the risk of lesions becomes necessary.
The field tests are practical to evaluate the strength in children(9-11), however showing some disadvantages, once they disable the control of factors that may influence the strength measure such as movement speed, articular angle and the environmental conditions. The control of these factors is important due to the specificity of the sportive movement, being controlled in laboratory with the use of computational dynamometers in order to evaluate the different types of strength (isometric and isokinetic). The applicability of the Cybex Norm measure in the sportive performance field, health and rehabilitation may present some advantages such as to test different types of strength (isometric and isokinetic). Despite the high cost, this equipment is already used at the main exercise laboratories for extended use in different groups(12).
The specific speed of the competitive volleyball movements has guided the development of isokinetic training programs addressed for the production of muscular contraction at specific speed at both muscular and neural levels, reason why the isokinetic muscular strength measuring appears to be so important.
Systematic studies using computational isokinetic dynamometers on the strength evaluation in children and youth volleyball athletes are unknown. The first objective of this study was to describe and to compare the muscular strength (isometric and isokinetic) with the use of the computational dynamometry in healthy children and youth volleyball athletes, from both genders at different maturational degrees.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The descriptive and transversal study evaluated the muscular strength in children and youth volleyball athletes from both genders, divided into three groups according to the maturational degree.
The sample was composed of children and youth from both genders and volleyball athletes in a competitive sportive training from a sports club.
66 volunteers participated on this study: 37 boys and 29 girls. The table 1 shows the sampling size and the physical characteristics of age, body mass, size, body mass index, body fatness percentile, triceps cutaneous skinfold, subscapula, suprailiac, abdomen and thigh, and thigh and arm circumference of each group. All white (except for two black) healthy individuals participated on the competitive sportive volleyball training, according to anamnesis supervised by pediatric physician(13).
The prepubescent (PP) participants trained about 4.5 weekly hours for at least one year; the pubescent (PU) trained about 7.7 weekly hours with 1-3 years of training and the postpubescent (PO) trained about 12 weekly hours with 2-6 years of training. All participated on physical education classes in school, twice a week.
As inclusion criterion, the athletes could not present any preceding muscular disease, chronic disease or obesity, being expected to cooperate with the procedures. No volunteer was excluded.
An invitation was sent to the coaches with the purpose of informing the objectives of this study and the coaches in turn indicated the telephone number of the athletes interested in participating on this study. Their parents were contacted for elucidation and for tests scheduling. Only those who agreed with all study procedures participated in this study after their parents signed up an approval written form. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee from the Rio Grande do Sul Federal University. Each evaluation was performed by the same investigator for a better standardization and tests controlling. Each athlete attended once the Exercise Research Laboratory (Lapex) accompanied by one parent for the following procedures: 1) selection and elucidation; 2) maturity and body composition evaluations; and 3) strength evaluation.
The participants were self-evaluated for PP, PU and PO degrees of maturation, according to the maturational classification of Tanner (1962)(14). One female appraiser explained the self-evaluation for the girls and a male appraiser, for the boys. This self-evaluation has shown to be valid, strongly correlating with the direct observation(15).
The body mass and the size were measured in electronic balance and estadiometer label Filizola, and the body mass index (IMC) was calculated. The fatness percentile was calculated by means of the Slaughter et al. (1988)(16) equation in which parameters such as gender, race and maturational degree are taken into consideration. In order to evaluate the fatness, the cutaneous skinfold was measured always on the right side, with the use of the Lange compass and following the Lohman et al. (1991)(17) standards. The arm and thigh circumference (medial) were measured with the Lufkin metric tape.
The isokinetic (concentric) and isometric strengths were evaluated in a computational dynamometer (Cybex Norm), always calibrated before the beginning of tests. The movements performed were the knee extension (EJ) and the elbow flexion (FC), using the torque peak as measure.
For all participants tested, for both knee extension and elbow flexion, there was a familiarization with three movements for each speed; and after a 30-second rest, the testing started.
For the EJ measure, the individuals remained comfortably seated at the equipment's chair, holding the side support. Their backs were rested against the back of the chair, which was adjusted for the fossa poplitea to be rested on the anterior part of the seat and for the central point of the knee articulation to be aligned to the dynamometer rotation axis. The hands were holding the side support. For a better thigh fixation, a belt was fastened above the knee articulation such as a seat belt in order to adjust trunk to the back of the chair.
For the FC measure, the individuals remained at decumbent position with knees bent and feet rested on a specific support. The trunk was fixed with a seat belt and the left hand holding the side of the equipment. The center of the elbow articulation was aligned to the dynamometer rotation axis. The shoulder was fixed with a belt, fastened diagonally from the right shoulder to the left elbow. This belt was fixed to the equipment with the objective of minimizing the movement and avoiding the compensation with the shoulder musculature.
Firstly, the isokinetic strength was evaluated at speeds of 60 and 90º.s-1, with three replicates for each speed with a 90-minute interval between them. The strength highest peak was considered as result.
After 120 seconds, the isometric strength was evaluated at angles of 45 and 60° of EJ (total extension = 0º) and 60 and 90ºof FC (total flexion = 180º), always in this order and at the right side, with a 120-second interval between them. The test was composed of three maximal voluntary contractions at each angle, each one with a contraction time of five seconds, with a 90-second interval between them, considering that the contraction time in order to assure that the maximal strength has been reached is between three and five seconds with two up to five contractions(18). The interval was of 120 seconds between the angles. The torque highest peak from the three attempts was considered as result.
The rest interval protocol used was based on the work of Ramsay et al.(19) and Hebestreit et al.(20) During all evaluations, the same appraiser performed a verbal stimulus. At the end of the tests, the appraisers guided the elongation of the tested musculature.
The results are expressed in terms of the average and standard deviation per group, according to maturation and gender. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the comparisons between gender and maturational degree. To investigate where significant differences between the maturational degrees occurred, the post hoc Tuckey test was used. The significance level considered was p < 0.05. The program SPSS 8.0 software was used for the analyses.
The figure 1 shows the results of the FC isometric strength per gender and maturation. In the isometric strength, boys were stronger than girls only for group PO, for both angles. The figure 2 shows the results of the FC isokinetic strength per gender and maturation. In the isokinetic strength, boys were stronger than girls only for group PO and at speed of 90º.s-1. In both the FC isometric and isokinetic strengths, the older groups were always stronger than the younger ones, for both genders.
The figure 3 shows the results of the EJ isometric strength per gender and maturation. Boys and girls presented similar results in the isometric strength tests, regardless the maturational degree. Figure 4 shows the result of the EJ isokinetic strength by gender and maturational degree. In the isokinetic strength, boys were stronger than girls for groups PP and PO at both speeds tested (60 and 90º.s-1). For both isometric and isokinetic strengths, the older groups were always stronger than the younger ones, for both genders.
The present study described and compared the muscular strength of boys and girls volleyball athletes from nine to 18 years of age. FC and EJ tests were performed in an isokinetic dynamometer, using a protocol previously applied to groups of non-athletes children and youth(12).
We believe that the sample was representative of a competitive volleyball athlete children and youth group. No difference statistically significant was found in the body mass, size and IMC (table 1) between genders, except for size in the group PO in which boys were taller than girls. With regard to the fatness, the girls demonstrated higher values of cutaneous skinfold and fatness percentile than boys from puberty, except for the subscapula in the group PO. This differences standard seems not to be affected by the practice of the physical activity, once it also occur in non-athletes(21). Furthermore, part of the difference may be due to the high calorie ingestion, as demonstrated by studies by Almeida and Soares(2), when studied a group of female volleyball athletes from Rio de Janeiro with training load equal to the present study and average age of 16 years.
Coincidently, our PO athletes presented anthropometric values quite similar to the mentioned study (body mass of 64.35 kg; size of 1.74 m; fatness percentile of 20.51; triceps of 17.55 mm; subscapula of 13.74 mm; suprailiac of 12.95 mm; abdomen of 21.01 mm; thigh of 26.05; arm perimeter of 26.01 cm and thigh perimeter of 52.29 cm).
With regard to the muscular strength, according to results, the study has emphasized that the maturational degree strongly influences the muscular strength, and differences statistically significant were found for all groups tested for both genders.
With regard to the prepubescent groups, the boys were stronger than the girls only for the EJ isokinetic test at 60º.s-1. In a study by Schneider et al.(12), who used the same protocol as the present study with a non-athletes sample, it is observed that the boys from group PP were stronger than the girls for the EJ isometric tests at 45 and 60°, and for the FC isokinetic tests at 60 and 90º.s-1. This indicates that the girls from group PP of this study, who practice volleyball competitively, reach strength levels similar to boys, especially at the upper members. This finding is supported by studies(22,23) that demonstrated responses of strength increase on prepubescent girls after strength training.
In the present study, no difference was found between genders in none of the tests between the pubescent groups. In the study(12) with non-athletes pubescent previously mentioned, the boys were stronger than the girls in most of the tests. This may demonstrate that the pubescent girls, who participate on a competitive sport modality such as volleyball, may increase their strength in order to become as strong as the boys. It may be discussable how much of this strength is due to the volleyball specific training, but anyhow, these results reveal the importance of the sportive practice, especially among female youth, who belong to a risk group for the decrease of the physical activity degree(24).
In the postpubescent groups, more differences were found between genders, comparing to the prepubescent and pubescent groups. In this case, boys were significantly stronger than girls in three out of the four FC tests and in two out of the four EJ tests. For the other tests, despite the higher torque peak values presented by boys, the difference was not statistically significant.
It is possible that the differences between genders were even higher if a higher number of girls had participated in this study. This was not possible due to the non-attendance of girls on tests, despite the facilities for the scheduling of them.
The highest strength of the male PO may be explained due to the increase on the muscular mass in this gender and age range. The differences between genders occurred, despite the similar physical trainings. However, these strength differences between genders may be diminished in the upper members if corrected by the muscular mass, and may not exist in the lower members(25). During the growth peak, the boys tend to increase the difference of strength gain in relation to the girls(21). With the beginning of puberty, the strength increase may be different between genders by the testosterone androgenic action(4). Even not quite strong as the boys, the girls from the present study presented values about 100% higher than values from a similar group of non-athlete girls(12), indicating that the volleyball practice led to an increase on the muscular strength.
Despite the general increase on the muscular strength found in the present study in relation to the non-athletes, this increase could be even optimized if the athletes participated on a specific training of muscular strength. In the study of Smith et al.(7), volleyball athletes were divided into strength-training group and control group. The strength-training group increased significantly the vertical jump and the knee extension at 180º.s-1, while the control group did not obtain significant increase, otherwise decreasing the power of the block jump. This jump power decrease was positively correlated to the decrease on the knee extension strength at 180º.s-1. The authors suggested that this performance decrease might have occurred due to the lack of strength training, thus leading to a higher fatigue in this muscular group.
In the present study, we did not correlate the results of muscular strength to tests of volleyball performance. We attempted to standardize the evaluation protocol based on a previous study(12) in order to enable comparisons between groups. We understand that we could include other movements, angles and speeds that would reflect other game situations and thus, to correlate them to the sport performance. Anyway, the protocol used in laboratory with dynamometry allowed the control of variables that could affect the strength values, enabling higher accuracy on the selected tests.
Finally, we believe that these data reflect the FC and EJ isometric and isokinetic strengths in a sample composed of boys and girls volleyball players from different maturational degrees. We have found that boys from PO, in general, were stronger than girls, and it was clear that the older groups were the strongest. These data could serve as reference for other groups of volleyball athletes.
Project sponsored by CNPq.
All the authors declared there is not any potential conflict of interests regarding this article.
1. Falk B, Tenenbaum G. The effectiveness of resistance training in children. A meta-analysis. Sports Med 1996;22:176-86. [ Links ]
2. Almeida TA, Soares EA. Perfil dietético e antropométrico de atletas adolescentes de voleibol. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2003;9:191-7. [ Links ]
3. Blimkie CJR. Age and sex associated variation in strength during childhood; anthropometric, morphologic, neurologic, biomechanical, endocrinologic, genetic and physical activity correlates. In: Gisolfi CV, Lamb DR, editors. Youth exercise and sport. Indianapolis: Benchmark Press, 1989;99-163. [ Links ]
4. Hansen L, Bangsbo J, Twisk J, Klausen K. Development of muscle strength in relation to training level and testosterone in young male soccer players. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:1141-7. [ Links ]
5. Morrow JR, Jackson AS, Hosler WW, Kachurik JK. The importance of strength, speed and body size for team success in women's intercollegiate volleyball. Res Q Exerc Sport 1979;50:429-37. [ Links ]
6. Blattner SE, Noble L. Relative effects of isokinetic and plyometric training on vertical jumping performance. Res Q Exerc Sport 1979;50:583-8. [ Links ]
7. Smith DJ, Shelley S, Kilb B. Effects of resistance training on isokinetic and volleyball performance measures. The Journal of Applied Sport Science Research 1987;1:42-4. [ Links ]
8. Butler R, Rogness K. Strength training for the young volleyball player. J Strength Cond Res 1983;5:66-8. [ Links ]
9. Gaya A, Cardoso M, Siqueira O, Torres L. Crescimento e desempenho motor em escolares de 7 a 15 anos provenientes de famílias de baixa renda. In: Indicadores para o planejamento de programas de educação física voltados à promoção da saúde. Revista Movimento 1997;6:1-24. [ Links ]
10. Guedes DP, Barbanti V. Desempenho motor em crianças e adolescentes. Rev Paul Ed Física 1995;9:37-50. [ Links ]
11. Ferreira M, França NM, Souza MT, Matsudo VKR. Comparação da aptidão física de escolares de Itaquera e São Caetano do Sul. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov 1990;4:19-27. [ Links ]
12. Schneider P, Rodrigues L, Meyer F. Dinamometria computadorizada como metodologia de avaliação de força muscular de meninos e meninas em diferentes estágios de maturidade. Rev Paul Ed Física 2002;16: 35-42. [ Links ]
13. Meyer F. Avaliação da saúde e aptidão física para recomendação de exercício em pediatria. Rev Bras Med Esporte 1999;5:1-3. [ Links ]
14. Tanner JM. Growth and adolescence. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1962. [ Links ]
15. Matsudo S, Matsudo V. Self-assessment and physician assessment of sexual maturation in Brazilian boys and girls: concordance and reproducibility. Am J Hum Biol 1994;6:451-5. [ Links ]
16. Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Horswill CA, Stillman RJ, Vanloan MD, et al. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 1988;60:709-23. [ Links ]
17. Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Abridged ed. Human Kinetics, 1991. [ Links ]
18. Badillo JJG, Ayestarán EG. In: Fundamentos del entrenamiento de la fuerza. Aplicación al alto rendimento deportivo. 2a ed., Espanha: Inde Publicaciones, 1997. [ Links ]
19. Ramsay JA, Blimkie CJ, Smith K, Garner S, MacDougall JD, Sale DG. Strength training effects in prepubescent boys. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1990;22:605-14. [ Links ]
20. Hebestreit H, Mimura K, Bar-Or O. Recovery of muscle power after high-intensity short-term exercise: comparing boys and men. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:2875-80. [ Links ]
21. Malina R, Bouchard C. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Champaign: Illinois, Human Kinetics, 1991. [ Links ]
22. Faigenbaum AD, Zaichkowsky LD, Westcott WL, Micheli LJ, Fehlandt AF. The effects of a twice-a-week strength training program on children. Pediatric Exercise Science 1993;5:339-46. [ Links ]
23. Treuth MS, Hunter GR, Pichon C, Figueroa-Colon R, Goran MI. Fitness and energy expenditure after strength training in obese prepubertal girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998;30:1130-6. [ Links ]
24. American College of Sports Medicine. Clinical conditions influencing exercise prescription. In: Philadelphia, Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 2000. [ Links ]
25. Monteiro WD. Força muscular: uma abordagem fisiológica em função do sexo, idade e treinamento. Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física e Saúde 1997;2:50-66. [ Links ]
Rua Felizardo, 750, Jardim Botânico
90690-200 Porto Alegre, RS
Received in 26/11/03
2nd version received in 24/2/04
Approved in 4/3/04
*Escola de Educação Física UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS.