SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue4Comparison between direct and indirect protocols of aerobic fitness evaluation in physically active individualsEvaluation of water loss during high intensity rugby training author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte

Print version ISSN 1517-8692

Rev Bras Med Esporte vol.11 no.4 Niterói July/Aug. 2005

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-86922005000400004 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Impact of an eight-week weight training program on the muscular strength of men and women*

 

Impacto de ocho semanas de entrenamiento con pesos sobre la fuerza muscular de hombres y mujeres

 

 

Raphael Mendes Ritti Dias; Edilson Serpeloni Cyrino; Emanuel Péricles Salvador; Fábio Yuzo Nakamura; Fábio Luiz Cheche Pina; Arli Ramos de Oliveira

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

The objective of the present study was to verify the impact of an eight-week weight training program (WT) on the muscular strength. To do so, 23 men (20.7 ± 1.7 years) and 15 women (20.9 ± 2.1 years), apparently healthy and moderately active (regular physical activity < 2 times a week) were submitted to a WT program composed of 10 exercises for the different muscular groups during eight consecutive weeks. Three series of 8-12 RM were performed in each exercise in three weekly sessions with intervals each 48 hours. The pre and post-training muscular strength was determined by means of 1-RM tests in bench press, squat and arm curl exercises after five familiarization sessions. Increases on the muscular strength were verified in both genders in all exercises investigated as well as in the total amount of load lifted (P < 0.01). Although men presented higher absolute strength when compared to women in all exercises evaluated, the gains observed along time were higher for women (14.7 vs. 7.6% in squat; 17.2 vs. 11.0% bench press; 20.4 vs. 14.0% in arm curl). The results suggest that the eight-week WT period seems to be sufficient to promote significant modifications in the muscular strength of men and women in different body segments (lower limbs, trunk and upper limbs).

Key words: Weight training. Muscular strength. Neural adaptations. Motor performance. 1-RM tests.


RESUMEN

El objetivo del presente estudio fué el de verificar el impacto de ocho semanas de entrenamiento con pesos (TP) sobre la fuerza muscular. Para ello, 23 hombres (20,7 ± 1,7 años) y 15 mujeres (20,9 ± 2,1 años), aparentemente saludables y moderadamente activos (atividad física regular < 2 veces por semana), fueron sometidos a un programa de TP por 10 ejercicios para los diferentes grupos musculares durante ocho semanas consecutivas. Tres series de 8-12 RM fueron realizadas en cada ejercicio, en tres sesiones semanales intervaladas a cada 48 horas. La fuerza muscular, fué determinada pre y post entrenamiento por medio de los tests de 1-RM en los ejercicios press de banco, sentadillas, curl con barra en pie, después de cinco sesiones de familiarización. Aumentos de la fuerza muscular fueron identificados en ambos sexos, en los tres ejercicios investigados bien como una sumatoria de carga total levantada (P < 0,01). A pesar, de los hombres presentaban una fuerza absoluta mayor que las mujeres en todos los ejercicios analizados, las ganacias observadas a lo largo del tiempo fueron mayores en el sexo femenino (14,7 vs. 7,6% en sentadillas; 17,2 vs. 11,0% en press de banco; 20,4 vs. 14,0% en la curl con barra en pie). Los resultados sugieren que el período de ocho semanas de TP parece ser suficiente para promover modificaciones significantivas en la fuerza muscular de hombres y mujeres, en diferentes segmentos corporales (miembros inferiores, tronco y miembros superiores).

Palabras-clave: Entrenamiento con pesos. Fuerza muscular. Adaptaciones neurales. Desempeño motor. Tests de 1-RM.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Weight training (WT) is one of the physical exercise modalities most practiced by individuals from different age ranges, both genders and with diverse physical fitness levels. This fact may be easily explained by the several benefits this practice brings that includes since important morphological, neuromuscular and physiological modifications up to social and behavioral alterations.

One of the main alterations associated the practice of WT reported in literature has been the increase on the muscular strength levels, both in children and adults as well as in older people from both genders(1-3). This adaptation seems to be associated with at least two factors called as neural adaptations and muscular hypertrophy.

In this context, in untrained individuals, the increase on the muscular strength levels apparently occurs more intensely during the first training weeks, fact that has been attributed to neural adaptations by many authors. Thus, there are evidences that most part of the muscular strength gains in initial periods of a WT program are due to the increase on the total muscular activation, increase on the shot frequency and synchronization of the motor units or even due to the reduction on the co-activation of the antagonistic muscles during exercise(4-6).

On the other hand, the muscular hypertrophy seems to occur more intensely later on, in other words, after some weeks of training(7). Although there is a tendency to associate muscular strength levels with the size of the muscle cross-sectional area, this relation seems to be true only when most of the neural adaptations have already been shown(8).

Despite the existence of an extensive literature indicating relevant modifications induced by the practice of WT programs, the magnitude of these alterations are not yet fully cleared when men and women are submitted to the same type of training program, once most studies have included subjects from only one gender, besides the fact that the protocols used have been quite differentiated.

Therefore, it seems to exist a great difficulty to compare results obtained from different studies, once most protocols designed for women have emphasized volume rather than intensity, and these protocols have been characterized, above all, by the high number of repetitions (15-20 RM). Moreover, the lack of standardization in the other training variables (frequency, intensity, recovery period, intervals between sessions, exercises used, muscular strength evaluation means, among others) makes the comparison between information produced by literature even more difficult.

Thus, one believes that investigations with most of these variables under control involving individuals from both genders and similar physical fitness levels will be able to support the comprehension of the effectiveness of WT programs and the possible differences of behavior between men and women as response to this type of physical exercise.

Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the behavior of muscular strength indicatives in men and women after a standardized eight-week weight training.

 

METHODOLOGY

Subjects

Thirty-eight university students (23 men and 15 women) apparently healthy participated as volunteers in this study. As initial inclusion criteria, the individuals should be moderately active (regular physical activity < 2 time a week) and not being enrolled in any physical activity program in the last six months before the experiment. Furthermore, each participant responded to a questionnaire on the health history before the study and no metabolic or muscle-skeletal dysfunction was reported.

After being previously cleared about the objectives of the investigation and procedures they would be submitted to, the individuals signed a free and cleared consent term. This study was previously approved by the Ethics Committee in Researches of the Londrina State University, according to norms of the resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council on researches involving human beings.

Anthropometry

The body mass was measured in a digital reading scale label Urano, model PS180 A, with accuracy of 100 g and maximum load of 180 kg, whereas the stature was determined using a wooden stadiometer with accuracy of 1 mm, according to procedures recommended by Gordon et al.(9). Based on these measures, the body mass index (BMI) was calculated by means of the relation between body mass and the squared stature, where weight was expressed in kilograms (kg) and stature in meters (m).

1-RM tests

The muscular strength was determined by means of the repetition maximum test (1-RM) in three exercises involving trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs segments. The execution order of the exercises tested was the following: bench press, squat and arm curl, respectively. The minimum interval between exercises was of five minutes. These exercises were selected for being quite popular in weight training programs of individuals with different trainability levels.

The subjects were previously submitted to a five-minute warm up exercises in cycle ergometer with light load at velocity of 65 rpm. Furthermore, each exercise was preceded of a series of warm up exercises (6-10 RM) with approximately 50% of the load estimated for the first attempt in the 1-RM test. The testing started two minutes after specific warm up exercise. The individuals were told to complete two repetitions. In case two repetitions were completed in the first attempt or even if no repetition was completed at all, a second attempt was performed after a 3-5 minute recovery interval with loads above (first possibility) or below (second possibility) that employed in the previous attempt. Such procedure was performed once again in a third and ultimate attempt in case the load corresponding to a single repetition maximum was not yet determined. Therefore, the load registered as the 1-RM was that in which the individual could complete only one single repetition maximum(10).

A familiarization protocol was previously employed in the attempt of reducing the effects of the apprenticeship and establishing the reproducibility of tests in all exercises. All subjects were tested in situation similar to the protocol adopted in five distinct sessions with intervals of 48 hours. The intra-class coefficients (R) were of 0.98 for bench press and of 0.96 for squat and arm curl.

It is worth emphasizing that the execution form and technique of each exercise were standardized and continuously monitored in the attempt of assuring the test efficiency.

Weight training program

The WT program was performed during eight consecutive weeks including three weekly sessions performed in alternated days. The frequency to the training sessions was above 80% (19 to 24 sessions).

The design of the training program followed the alternated order by body segment and all 10 exercises proposed were performed according to the following order: bench press, leg press at 45º, lat pulldown, leg extension, overhead press, leg curl, triceps pressdown, calf in leg press, arm curl and crunch.

All exercises were performed in three series of 8-12 repetition maximums (RM), except for the abdomen muscular group, performed in three fixed series of 50 repetitions with overload of the own body. In the three first exercises of the sequence, a series of warm up exercises of 15 repetitions with approximately 50% of the load to be used in each exercise was arbitrarily added in the attempt of supporting the physiological and neural responses to subsequent efforts. The recovery interval established between series was of 60-90 seconds. On the other hand, the transition interval between exercises was of 120 to 180 seconds. Although the movements execution velocity was not controlled, the subjects were told to try to perform each movement in the concentric phase within one to two seconds and in the eccentric phase within two to four seconds.

Both the initial loads and the periodic adjustments of loads used in the different exercises were established based on results obtained by means of the application weight tests through repetitions maximum(11). The individuals were oriented to readjust the training loads whenever the repetitions upper limit pre-established for each exercise was reached in all series with the objective of maintaining the initial intensity.

Statistical treatment

The t-Student test for independent samples with different number of elements was used for comparisons between general characteristics of men and women. The 2 x 2 analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for repeated measures was used to evaluate possible modifications in the muscular strength of both groups (men and women) along time (pre and post-experiment), once the initial conditions of groups were different with pre-experiment values being used as covariables. The post hoc Tukey test was used for the identification of specific differences in variables in which the values of F found were higher than the statistical significance criterion established (P < 0.05).

 

RESULTS

The general characteristics of subjects are described in table 1. Men presented values of body mass (~6.1 kg) and stature (~9.4 cm) higher than the women investigated (P < 0.01).

 

 

Table 2 presents the results of the pre and post-training 1-RM tests of men and women. An increase statistically significant on the muscular strength was verified after eight weeks of WT both for men and women in all exercises investigated as well as in the total amount of load lifted (P < 0.05). Although men presented higher absolute strength when compared to women in all exercises evaluated, the gains observed along time were higher for women (14.7 vs. 7.6% in squat; 17.2 vs. 11.0% bench press; 20.4 vs. 14.0% in arm curl). Thus, the ANCOVA verified no interaction gender x time in variables analyzed (P > 0.05).

 

 

DISCUSSION

The results found in the present study indicated that the period of eight weeks of WT seems to be sufficient to promote significant muscular strength gains both in men and in women. However, the muscular strength gains observed occurred in different magnitude when men and women were compared. Women presented an increment relatively higher than men in the three exercises investigated.

These results, however, are similar to most results available in literature from studies that investigated possible modifications on muscular strength induced by short WT periods (< 12 weeks) in men and women(12-15).

In this context, Hunter(12) verified increments of 11.9% and 19.5% in bench press exercise in men and women, respectively, after 10 weeks of WT. Wilmore(15) had already reported increments of 28.6% and 16.4% in men and women, respectively, in the same exercise during similar period of WT intervention. In the present study, the muscular strength gains in bench press reached 11.0% in men and 17.0% in women, despite the shorter intervention time.

The modifications on the muscular strength during short WT periods seem to be a result of the improvement on the intra and intermuscular neural adjustment during the performance of the movement. One believes that such adaptations are associated with the increase on the number of motor units recruited, increase on the shot frequency and synchronization of the motor units or even due to reduction on the co-activation of the antagonistic muscles, thus unchaining higher strength output during the initial training phases(5).

In this context, Hakkinen et al.(4), through electromyographic analyses, verified the muscular activation and the co-activation of antagonistic muscles of men and women followed during six months of WT. The partial results indicated that after two months of WT, a significant increase on the total muscular activation already occurred (iEMG), along with the reduction on the co-activation of antagonistic muscles in both groups, resulting in relevant increase on the muscular strength levels.

Although the initial increments on muscular strength are associated above all with neural adaptations, as previously described, some studies have reported important modifications on the muscular morphology in only two weeks of WT(14,16), such as the increase on the amount of myosin heavy chain type IIa, demonstrating that the morphological alterations of the muscular tissue may occur since the first WT sessions. However, it was not yet well established whether these short-term adaptations influence the muscular strength development or not.

Despite the mechanisms involved in the different responses found between genders for muscular strength are not yet well defined, it seems that the initial differences in training level may influence strongly the results. Although this variable was not controlled in the present study, one believes that, generally, the physical activity level of most women is below that presented by men. In this context, it would be expected that women presented the highest increases on muscular strength(17), what was actually verified in this study.

Another possible explanation for the differences in increases on muscular strength between men and women would be the better recruitment standard of motor units in women in relation to men. In this context, Lemmer et al.(13) performed a study where the crossed-education mechanism and the peak isokinetic torque as indicative of the training neural adaptations were evaluated. Thus, men and women submitted to a 12-week training program of unilateral thigh extension presented significant increases on the maximum strength of the untrained limb (crossed-education mechanism). However, an increment on the peak isokinetic torque of the trained limb was only identified among women, suggesting that the neural adaptations are more intense among women than among men.

An interesting finding of this study is that the muscular strength gain of men and women followed a similar order, in other words, arm curl > bench press > squat. Such differences are probably related with the complexity of the motor task required in the different exercises. It seems that the exercises involving the participation of a larger number of muscular groups would require a longer period of time for a plateau on the neural adjustments and on the apprenticeship of the movement motor task to be established(8).

This hypothesis is reinforced by the findings of Cronin & Henderson(18), who verified temporal differences in the familiarization process to 1-RM test between bench press and squat exercises. While for bench press, only one familiarization session was required for the load stabilization, for squat, two sessions were required. According to the authors, the higher complexity of the motor task required for squat was considered the main explanation for the longer familiarization time required for this exercise.

It is worth emphasizing that among the exercises evaluated, the squat was the only one not included in the WT program performed. This fact probably may have affected the familiarization process for this exercise and hence the neural adjustment of the movement compared with the other exercises tested, which were included in the training program.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study indicated that the eight-week WT period seems to be sufficient to promote significant modifications in the muscular strength of men and women in bench press, squat and arm curl exercises.

However, women presented muscular strength gains proportionally higher than those observed in men in all exercises investigated, what suggests that women seem to present higher potential for the development of the muscular strength when compared with men after short WT periods. One believes that these differences may be attributed, at least in part, to the lower initial training levels of the women analyzed and/or to a higher distribution of the neural factors among women.

All the authors declared there is not any potential conflict of interests regarding this article.

 

REFERENCES

1. American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:364-80.        [ Links ]

2. Bernhardt DT, Gomez J, Johnson MD, Martin TJ, Rowland TW, Small E, et al. Strength training by children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2001;107:1470-2.        [ Links ]

3. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamental of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:674-88.        [ Links ]

4. Hakkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Malkia E, et al. Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 1998;84:1341-9.        [ Links ]

5. Komi PV. Training of muscle strength and power: interaction of neuromotoric, hypertrophic, and mechanical factors. Int J Sports Med 1986;7:10-5.        [ Links ]

6. Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, Minetti AE, Cerretelli P. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1989;59:310-9.        [ Links ]

7. Moritani T, Devries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 1978;58:115-30.        [ Links ]

8. Chilibeck PD, Calder AW, Sale DG, Webber CE. A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1998;77:170-5.        [ Links ]

9. Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Stature, recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books, 1988;3-8.        [ Links ]

10. Clarke DH. Adaptations in strength and muscular endurance resulting from exercise. In: Wilmore JH, editor. Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews. New York: Academic Press, 1973;73-102.        [ Links ]

11. Rodrigues CEC, Rocha PECP. Musculação: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Sprint, 1985.        [ Links ]

12. Hunter G. Changes in body composition, body build and performance associated with different weight training frequencies in males and females. NSCA J 1985;4:26-8.        [ Links ]

13. Lemmer JT, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Metter EJ, et al. Age and gender responses to strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32:1505-12.        [ Links ]

14. Staron RS, Karapondo DL, Kraemer WJ, Fry AC, Gordon SE, Falkel JE, et al. Skeletal muscle adaptations during early phase of heavy-resistance training in men and women. J Appl Physiol 1994;73:1247-55.        [ Links ]

15. Wilmore JH. Alterations in strength, body composition and anthropometric measurements consequent to a 10-week weight training program. Med Sci Sports 1974;6:133-8.        [ Links ]

16. Jurimae J, Abernethy PJ, Blake K, McEniery MT. Changes in the myosin heavy chain isoform profile of the triceps brachii muscle following 12 weeks of resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996;74:287-92.        [ Links ]

17. Cureton KJ, Collins MA, Hill DW, McElhannon FM Jr. Muscle hypertrophy in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988;20:338-44.        [ Links ]

18. Cronin JB, Henderson ME. Maximal strength and power assessment in novice weight trainers. J Strength Cond Res 2004;18:48-52.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Grupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Metabolismo
Nutrição e Exercício, Centro de Educação Física e Desportos
Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 380, Campus Universitário
86051-990 Londrina, PR, Brasil
E-mail: emcyrino@uel.br

Received in 8/11/04. 2nd version received in 3/5/05. Approved in 15/5/05.

 

 

* Research and Study Group in Metabolism, Nutrition and Exercise, Sports and Physical Education Center – Londrina State University.