Services on Demand
Print version ISSN 1517-8692
On-line version ISSN 1806-9940
Rev Bras Med Esporte vol.13 no.5 Niterói Sept./Oct. 2007
Fábio Yuzo NakamuraI, II, IV; Daniel Müller HiraiI, IV; Thiago Oliveira BorgesI; Alexandre Hideki OkanoI, II; Fernando Roberto DeOliveiraIII; Antonio Fernando BrunettoIV
de Estudo das Adaptações Fisiológicas ao Treinamento (GEAFIT),
Centro de Educação Física e Esporte. Universidade Estadual
de Londrina Londrina/PR
IIGrupo de Estudo e Pesquisa em Metabolismo, Nutrição e Exercício (GEPEMENE), Centro de Educação Física e Esporte. Universidade Estadual de Londrina Londrina/PR
IIIUniversidade Federal de Lavras Lavras/MG
IVLaboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar (LFIP) Universidade Estadual de Londrina Londrina/PR
Evaluation of aerobic fitness indicators in canoers reveals functional characteristics acquired through specific training, which can be related to competitive performance. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate functional evaluators obtained in ergospirometry test of young canoers, as well as to verify the relationship of these variables with performance in 200, 500 and 1000 m distances. The sample consisted of 12 male athletes (17.6 ± 2.1 years; 175.7 ± 2.5 cm; 68.3 ± 6.3 kg) through a test in cycle ergometer of upper extremities for determination of oxygen uptake in the ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1 1.8 ± 0.4 L/min), in the ventilatory threshold 2 (VT2 2.9 ± 0.4 L/min) and VO2peak (3.5 ± 0.4 L/min). The test began with a 17 W load, with 17 W/min increments until voluntary exhaustion. The athletes have been also submitted to specific tests in K1 individual canoe in a lake, with the purpose to reach the lowest times in the referred distances (times equivalent to 47.6 ± 4.3, 122.0 ± 9.0 and 239.5 ± 12.6 s, respectively). The SpearmanRank correlation test was used (rs), with significance level set at 5%. Moderate correlation was observed between VT2 and time in the 1000 m (rs = 0.685), VO2peak and time in the 500 m (rs = 0.699) and VO2peak and time in the 1000 m) rs = 0.734). Therefore, it is concluded that VT2 and VO2peak obtained in cycle ergometer of upper extremities, and expressed in absolute terms, predict performance in 500 and 1000 m canoeing events and can be potentially applied in evaluation of canoers.
Keywords: Ventilatory thresholds. Oxygen uptake peak. Canoeing.
In the majority of sports modalities, competitive performance depends on optimum and/or maximal multiple physical capacities. Therefore, the morphofunctional improvement of the body, obtained from the planned imposition of workloads in the long run, has as aim to reach progressively higher performance levels. However, the validity of this thinking is only sustained when the training stimuli result is relevant in biological adaptations or specific to the chosen sports modality.
Several studies have focused on establishing relationships between morphofunctional indicators and sportive performance. The aim is to determine prediction, physiological and morphological factors of competitive result, as well as to discriminate variables which are able to be prioritized and periodically evaluated in training. In canoeing, some studies of this nature have been already conducted(13). Nevertheless, due to the fact that competitive distances include from very short distances (200 m) to very long ones (42.000 m), it is inferred that there is heterogeneity in the prediction physiological variables in competition. In other words, runner specialists in the different distances should present differentiated physiological and anthropometric characteristics. Concerning international level, male adult athletes perform the 200, 500 and 1.000 m events approximately in 38, 95 and 205 s, respectively.
Currently, among men, the Olympic velocity canoeing events are of 500 and 1.000 m. In these distances, it is estimated that the percentage contributions of the aerobic metabolism in the energetic transfer among athletes from the cadet and junior categories are of approximately 60% and 80%, respectively, for times of 151.4 ± 16.5 s and 315.8 ± 33.6 s(4). Therefore, it is expected that aerobic aptitude indicators of upper extremities have significant participation in performance in these distances, having thus predictive capacity over the times of these events.
Among the aerobic variables commonly used in performance prediction models and in the evaluation of athletes, the most widely used are the oxygen uptake peak (O2peak), the metabolic transition thresholds, the aerobic intensity/maximal load, the O2 submaximal (indicator of movement savings) and/or submaximal heart rate indices. The verification of the relationship of at least part of these variables with specific performance in canoeing still needs to be verified.
Therefore, the aims of this study were: (a) to evaluate aerobic aptitude indicators of young canoers; and (b) to verify the relationship of these variables (with and without allometric correction) with performance in 200, 500 and 1.000 m distances.
The sample consisted of twelve young canoers (17.6 ± 2.1 years; 175.7 ± 2.5 cm; 68.3 ± 6.3 kg), with competitive experience of at least one year. This sample consisted of athletes who had won medals in velocity and marathon national championships, in the cadet and junior categories; some of them had also participated in international championships. All subjects after having read and signed an informed consent form both from the participant and his responsible one, if they were under 18 years old, were submitted to two stages of evaluation: (1) ergospirometric test in cycle ergometer for upper extremities, (2) tests in a lake, composed of maximal efforts in preset distances, completed in K1 individual boat (5.20 m long, 12 kg heavy). The athletes were in a regeneration period after the main velocity competition.
Ergospirometric test of upper extremities
The progressive effort test was conducted in a cycle ergometer with mechanical resistance Monark®, adapted for upper extremities exercise. The cycle ergometer was attached over a table. The pedals were substituted by brass knuckles which allowed that the hands could be adjusted over them. The evaluated individual was then accommodated on a regular chair, placed behind the cycle ergometer. This configuration allowed that the most distal portion of the pedaling cycle was reached with arm approximately parallel to the ground and elbow almost extended. A digital odometer was installed and placed on the view span of the evaluated individual in order to have the velocity controlled.
The ventilatory variables were determined with the use of a VO2000® (Aerosport Inc.) apparel. The equipment for gas exchange was calibrated before each effort test. The calibration was performed from the environment gas sample (20.9% of O2 and 0.04% of CO2) and from the sample derived from a cylinder with known O2 (17%) and of CO2 (5%) concentration. Moreover, the gasses flow for the apparel was calibrated from a threeliter syringe, according to manufacture's standardization. The apparel was adjusted in order to be able to perform the expired gases analyses at every ten seconds. The laboratory temperature was kept between 2021ºC.
Before the beginning of the test, the participant would remain seated for three minutes for measurement of the rest ventilatory variables. After that, he pedaled for three extra minutes with no external resistance. The progressive test was conducted with no pause and initial load of 17 W, with load increments of 17 W per minute, until voluntary exhaustion. The rotation velocity of the pedal was set at 68 rotations per minute. The investigators would verbally motivate the volunteers. The mean of the O2 values reached in the three last measurements previous to exhaustion was considered the O2peak.
The ventilatory thresholds were calculated according to criteria promoted by Wasserman(5) and Simon et al.(6). The oxygen uptake in the ventilatory threshold 1 (LV1) was determined from the increase of the O2 equivalent ventilatory (E/O2) with no concomitant increase of the CO2 ventilatory equivalent (E/CO2). The oxygen uptake in the ventilatory threshold 2 (LV2) was determined from the increase of the E/CO2. The determinations were made through visual analysis of the ventilatory data, graphically plotted, which were registered through the consensus of three experienced evaluators.
Velocity canoeing tests
The velocity canoeing tests were performed within a period of two weeks. It comprised the ergospirometric tests of upper extremities. Previously to all kayak tests there was a brief warmup in which the participants completed 1.000 m at rhythm freely chosen. After rest of approximately five minutes, they were lined at the exit of the distance to be completed at the day. The distances were 200, 500 and 1.000 m, marked in a lake. The tests were performed at different days which were possibly performed at the same period of the day and with similar climate characteristics (preferably with no strong wind in favor or against the boats itinerary). The sequence was random. The athlete was asked by hand signal of the evaluator to perform a sprint at maximal velocity for the respective distance. The athletes were evaluated in groups in order to stimulate competition and motivate them to try their best performance. The time was registered with a manual lap timer with seconds' precision.
Descriptive statistics was performed for presentation of the data results (mean ± standard deviation) for the studied variables. The ratios between the physiological indicators obtained in the ergospirometric test and performance in the different distances in canoeing were verified by SpearmanRank correlation (rs), due to nonparametric characteristics of distribution of part of variables. The significance level adopted to consider the significant correlations was of P < 0.05.
In table 1 the results obtained by the athletes in the progressive effort test performed at cycle ergometer of upper extremities are presented. Relatively high values of O2peak as well as of the ventilatory thresholds were observed, both in absolute and relative terms concerning body weight.
In figure 1, the functional division of the effort domains is represented according to the criteria adopted by Gaesser and Poole(7). The ventilatory O2peak thresholds are expressed in relative terms concerning body weight. The O2peak was assumed as threshold higher than the severe threshold, and LV1 and LV2 as transition points between the moderate and intense domains, and intense and severe, respectively.
In table 2, the mean durations of the maximal efforts performed in the 200, 500 and 1.000 m distances are presented.
In table 3 the correlations between the capacity indicators (LV1 and LV2) and aerobic power (O2peak), obtained in the ergospirometric test, as well as the times registered in the 200, 500 e 1.000 sprints are presented. The variables of the ergospirometric test are presented in absolute terms.
It has been observed that LV1 does not significantly correlate with any of the specific performance indicators. On the other hand, LV2 moderately correlated with the time in the 1.000 m, while the O2peak presented moderate negative correlations with the time of the 500 and 1.000 m events simulations. Nonsignificant correlations were observed when the values of the aerobic indicators were expressed in relative terms concerning body weight (data not shown).
This study had as aim to describe the aerobic aptitude profile of canoers of national level, who in its majority are athletes from the cadet and junior categories, through metabolic transition thresholds detected by the ventilatory responses as well as the O2peak, and use them in the prediction of specific performance in velocity events.
The metabolic thresholds are traditionally considered indicators of aerobic capacity, since they correlate with long duration performance. Concerning the O2peak terms, the LV1 and LV2 values of the studied sample were approximately 50% and 80%. These are typical percentages found in nonathletes(6,8). However, in canoeing athletes, it is possible to find LV1 at around 85% of the O2peak, in ergometerkayak(910). Curiously, when they are evaluated in cycle ergometer for lower extremities, these canoers present reduction of about 10% in this percentage, showing the influence of the adaptative specificity in the evaluation of the training effects. The discrepancy between the results reached by the athletes from our sample and the ones studies by Bunc and Heller(9) and Bunc et al.(10) may be credited to the reduced number of training years of the athletes of the present study (3.1 ± 1.9 years). In the long run there could have been comparison between the aerobic capacity indicators. Moreover, other factors such as age and competitive level should be considered. Methodological issues should also be considered, once Bunc and Heller(9) and Bunc et al.(10) used test protocols with initial load relatively high, and the linearity break of the relationship between pulmonary ventilation and O2 as determination criterion for the LV1. One should not forget the possibility that the methodology by Bunc and Heller(9) and Bunc et al.(10) has generated estimate of LV2, and not LV1. The protocols started at around 4060% of the power generated in one minute of maximal effort, which could already be in loads above the LV1, making that the pulmonary ventilation breakage corresponded to the LV2. This fact would practically equal the athletes studied by us to the ones reported by the mentioned author. The fact that Fry and Morton(2) have found LV1 at 58% of O2peak in athletes selected in his country corroborates our possibilities.
The athletes studied by Bunc and Heller(9) were older and presented high competitive level within the European continent. It is interesting to note that the O2peak (51.9 ml/kg/min) of the male groups evaluated by Bunc and Heller(9) was equal to the one studied by us. Nevertheless, since they were taller and heavier, the athletes from Bunc and Heller(9) reached higher levels of O2peak in l/min. There is no knowledge of previous studies which have measured the LV2 in canoeing athletes. However, one may speculate that a similar pattern to the LV1 would be found. Therefore, it is probable that the percentage improvement of the ventilatory thresholds demand some years to come up completely.
The O2peak concerning the body weight reached by the canoers (51.9 ± 5.6 ml/kg/min) may be considered high, since comparatively it was higher than the values reported in young individuals, in its majority nonathletes, who performed maximal test in cycle ergometer for lower extremities (46.7 ± 8.5 ml/kg/min), in a previous study conducted by our group(11). Besides the greater muscular mass used by the lower segment of the body in a maximal exercise, which would justify a wide advantage of the legs in uptaking oxygen, there is the extra factor that the O2 cogency in the upper extremities is lower than in the lower extremities, which can be credited to factors such as heterogeneity in the blood flow distribution for the different muscles or functional portions of the same muscle, times of mean transit in the differentiated capillars, as well as areas of different diffusion(12).
It is estimated that individuals who belong to athletic groups who primarily train the upper extremities or secondarily train for their events (gymnastics, swimming, fights and yachting) present O2peak in exercises with the arms of 40.1 to 41.6 ml/kg/min(13). Therefore, the canoers of this study are in a higher level compared with the athletes of other modalities. Generally, the relationship between O2peak of arms and legs is between 0.82 and 0.90 in these population samples. Unfortunately, in this investigation, this relationship has not been calculated. Among young sedentary individuals, the O2peak of upper extremities varies from 30.4 ml/kg/min(13) to 34.2 ml/kg/min(14), suggesting hence that the canoers present great adaptability of the cardiorespiratory functions when facing training stimuli for upper extremities.
The canoers of this study presented O2peak equivalent to around 88% of the values reported by Fry and Morton(2) in high level Australian athletes (59.2 ± 7.1 ml/kg/min) and approximately 89% of the values obtained by Tesch(15) in canoers of the Swedish team in the 80's from last century (58.4 ± 3.1 ml/kg/min). On the other hand, the canoers from our sample had aerobic power levels similar to the members of the British team (52.6 ± 4.9 ml/kg/min), in the de 200 m distance competition(3). Finally, they have been higher than in high level Australian female athletes (44.8 ± 6.0 ml/kg/min), studied by Bishop(1). It is worth highlighting that in all mentioned studies, the athletes have been evaluated in ergometerkayak, which potentially offer them advantage compared with the canoers from this study due to specificity of the movements. In the movements performed in cycle ergometer for upper extremities, the chest, back and abdomen muscles are as intensely required as in the simulation of the canoeing gestures.
Significant correlations between several methodologies for estimation of metabolic and threshold transitions, O2peak and performance in velocity canoeing and in longer events have been reported by other authors. Fry and Morton(2) , for instance, showed significant correlations between LV1 and performance in 500 to 42.000 m events (r = 0.48 to 0.72). Similar values were found between the O2peak expressed in absolute terms and the times in the mentioned distances (r = 0.56 to 0.80). Similar results were found by Bishop(1) concerning performance in 500 m of female athletes. Interestingly, these aerobic variables roughly explain the performance in 200 m, being it the best one predicted by variables obtained in anaerobic tests(3). Functions concerned with instantaneous muscular strength and muscular work in 60 s tests also seem to be able to predict performance in distances between 500 and 42.000 m(2).
We believe that the lack of significance in the correlations between measurements concerning body weight of LV1, LV2 and O2peak, and performance, is due to the fact that in canoeing the negative effect of the body weight over dislocation is attenuated by the fact that the boat is hold on the water surface. In this situation, the absolute capacity of oxygen uptake and utilization, both in the thresholds and maximal effort, seem to be more relevant.
In the distances investigated in this study, there is probably an integrated participation of the anaerobic capacity and aerobic power, with the influence of the former in the 200 m, of both in the 500 m, and probably higher of the latter in the 1.000 m. despite the aerobic predominance in the 1.000 m, in this distance, the main limiting factor must be the capacity of standing high levels of muscular lactate, since in this stage, one works close to the O2peak, consequently above the LV2, what would cause a progressive increase of the lactate concentrations, and consequent fatigue caused by the deletereal effects of the pH decrease in the contractile apparatus.
A limitation of the present study has to do with the lack of other physiological (anaerobic capacity, strength), as well as anthropometric measurements, which could be obtained in laboratory with the aim to improve performance predictions in velocity canoeing, for samples similar to the one analyzed in this work. Such fact would aid in the proposition of more complex prediction equations, with multiple entrance variables. The correlations presented in this study between LV2 and O2peak, and performance, do not allow that these indicators are used as exclusive time determinants in velocity canoeing events. Therefore, further investigations which include other prediction variables as well as analysis of the measurements sensitivity to the longitudinal effects of training are needed.
It is concluded that the aerobic function indicators obtained in cycle ergometer of upper extremities may predict performance in canoeing velocity events. The LV2 presented correlation of 0.685 with performance in 1.000 m, and the O2peak correlated both with performance in 500 m (rs = 0.699) and in 1.000 (rs = 0.734). Therefore, both constitute physiological indicators which may be potentially applied in evaluation of canoers. It is worth mentioning that the measurements concerned with body weight did not present the same predictive properties.
1. Bishop D. Physiological predictors of flat-water kayak performance in women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;82:91-7. [ Links ]
2. Fry RD, Morton AR. Physiological and kinanthropometric attributes of elite flatwater kayakists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:1297-301. [ Links ]
3. van Someren KA, Palmer GS. Prediction of 200-m sprint kayaking performance. Can J Appl Physiol. 2003;28:505-17. [ Links ]
4. Nakamura FY, Borges TO, Sales OR, Cyrino ES, Kokubun E. Estimativa do custo energético e contribuição das diferentes vias metabólicas na canoagem de velocidade. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2004;10:70-7. [ Links ]
5. Wasserman K. The anaerobic threshold measurement to evaluate exercise performance. Am Rev Resp Dis. 1984;129:S35-S40. [ Links ]
6. Simon J, Young JL, Gutin B, Blood DK, Case RB. Lactate accumulation relative to the anaerobic and respiratory compensation thresholds. J Appl Physiol. 1983; 54:13-7. [ Links ]
7. Gaesser GA, Poole D. The slow component of oxygen uptake kinetics in humans. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1996;24:35-70. [ Links ]
8. Brunetto AF, Silva BM, Roseguini BT, Hirai DM, Guedes DP. Limiar ventilatório e variabilidade da freqüência cardíaca em adolescentes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2005;11:22-7. [ Links ]
9. Bunc V, Heller J. Ventilatory threshold and work efficiency on a bicycle and paddling ergometer in top canoeists. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1991;31:376-9. [ Links ]
10. Bunc V, Heller J, Leso J, Sprynarová S, Zdanowicz R. Ventilatory threshold in various groups of highly trained athletes. Int J Sports Med. 1987;8:275-80. [ Links ]
11. Nakamura FY, Brunetto AF, Hirai DM, Roseguini BT, Kokubun E. O limiar de esforço percebido (LEP) corresponde à potência crítica e a um indicador de máximo estado estável de consumo de oxigênio. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2005;11: 197-202. [ Links ]
12. Calbet JAL, Holmberg H-C, Rosdahl H, van Hall G, Jensem-Urstad M, Saltin B. Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005;289:1448-58. [ Links ]
13. Seals DR, Mullin JP. VO2max in variable type of exercise among well-trained upper body athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1982;53:58-63. [ Links ]
14. Washburn RA, Seals DR. Peak oxygen uptake during arm cranking for men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1984;56:954-7. [ Links ]
15. Tesch PA. Physiological characteristics of elite kayak paddlers. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1983;8:87-91. [ Links ]
Correspondence to: Approved in 26/4/07. All the authors
declared there is not any potential conflict of interests regarding this article.
Fábio Yuzo Nakamura
Grupo de Estudo das Adaptações Fisiológicas ao Treinamento
Centro de Educação Física e Esporte
Universidade Estadual de Londrina,
Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km 380, Campus Universitário
86051990 Londrina, PR, Brazil
Tels.: (43) 33714238/33287121
Approved in 26/4/07.
All the authors declared there is not any potential conflict of interests regarding this article.