Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
- Similars in SciELO
Print version ISSN 1517-8692
Rev Bras Med Esporte vol.18 no.2 São Paulo Mar./Apr. 2012
LOCOMOTOR APPARATUS IN EXERCISE AND SPORTS
Elba Fonseca de SouzaI; Débora CantergiII; Aline MendonçaI; Cloud KennedyI; Jefferson Fagundes LossII
ISocial College of Bahia Salvador, BA
IIFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, RS
The literature has shown that small modifications in a Pilates method exercise may change the muscles activation pattern. Moreover, few studies have evaluated Pilates' exercises from the kinesiology point of view. Therefore, this study aimed to compare a couple of exercises performed on the mat and in apparatus regarding electric activation of acting muscle groups. Eleven healthy Pilates trained women took part in the study. Electromyographic data were collected from the rectus femoris and rectus abdominis muscles, right and left portions, while keeping the isometric posture of the hundred on mat, hundred on the Reformer apparatus, teaser on mat and teaser on the Cadillac apparatus exercises. The five central seconds of each execution normalized by maximum voluntary contraction were analyzed. Statistical analysis showed difference between the muscle group's activation that was higher for the rectus femoris, and interaction between muscle and exercise, where rectus femoris muscle's electric activation was higher on the hundred exercise performed on mat and Reformer and rectus abdominis muscle's electric activation was higher on teaser performed in the Cadillac apparatus. Based on the study results, it may be stated that: (i) when compared the hundred (on mat and Reformer) and teaser (on mat and Cadillac) exercises were compared, no difference was found between them regarding rectus abdominis and rectus femoris muscles' activation; (ii) when muscle groups were compared, the rectus femoris presented higher activation levels on the hundred exercise performed on mat and Reformer, while rectus abdominis presented higher activation during the teaser exercise performed on Cadillac.
Keywords: biomechanics, applied kinesiology, abdomen.
The Pilates method has been widely used in rehabilitation and physical fitness, and it be performed on mat (mat Pilates) or in apparatus which allow that elastic resistance be used as resistive load1. Many of the exercises performed on mat are used very similarly in the apparatus, being the overload of the springs the only difference. The Pilates exercises and their possible variations choice is many times defined from informally transmitted guidance by the method's instructors. Since there is a large number of possibilities and indications, analyses of the Pilates exercise have been quite relevant2.
The literature has been studying the exercises in the Pilates method many times comparing them with those classically performed in body building trainings3, or even with other examples of physical activity, such as yoga4 and tai chi chuan5. Nonetheless, the comparison between exercises performed on mat and in the apparatus has been little explored. In one of the few comparisons between exercises found in the literature, Sacco et al.6 analyzed exercises in the mat versus apparatus situations, pointing out differences under a biomechanical analysis perspective, but without assessing the electrical activation of the musculature.
Common Pilates exercises, such as the hundred and the teaser, may be performed similarly on mat or with the aid of apparatus. These two exercises are performed at dorsal decubitus. The hundred is characterized by the maintenance of hip and trunk flexion, keeping lower limbs with no contact with the ground, which lets only the low back in touch with the ground, while the arms perform an oscillation movement. When performed in apparatus, the individual may be challenged by the elastic resistance on his/her hands. The teaser exercise may be dynamic or isometric. When it is isometric, the performer keeps hip flexed, and legs and trunk lifted. When it is performed in an apparatus, the individual may use the elastic resistance with aid or not of overload.
Considering also that slight alterations in one exercise of the Pilates method may alter the muscular activation pattern7,8 and that studies which evaluate Pilates exercises from the kinesiological viewpoint are still scarce (electrical activity of the involved muscles), the aim of this study was to compare two exercises (hundred and teaser) performed on mat and in the apparatus concerning the electrical activation of the acting muscular groups.
11 healthy women (aged 29.6 ± 7.97 years, weight of 62.3 ± 4.1kg, height of 158.1 ± 4.7cm, BMI of 24.6 ± 1.1%) Pilates' practitioners for at least six months participatedin the study. According to the resolution 196/96 of the National Board of Health, all participants were informed about the research before agreeing on participating and signed a Free Clarified Consent Form.
An electromyograph of four channels, common rejection mode of 110db (at 60Hz), entrance impedance of the system of 100 Gohmsand A/D converter of 14 bits (Miotool 400, Miotec) was used for electromyography data collection. The sign was collected with a sample frequency of 2,000Hz per channel.
The skin was prepared with shaving, abrasion and sanitation. Pairs of Ag/AgCl surface electrodes with 22mm diameter Kendall, Meditrace 100) were bilaterally placed on the surface of the rectus abdominis and rectus femor is muscles on each leg. The distance between electrodes was of 20mm. The skin preparation and electrodes placement of the rectus femoris followed recommendation of the Seniam project9. The electrodes positioning on the rectus abdominis musculature followed recommendations of specific literature10. The reference electrode was positioned on the medial side of the right tibia. Aiming to compare the signs derived from the monitored muscles, two maximum voluntary contractions were performed (MVC) for the rectus abdominis and two MVC for the recturs femor is, both at dorsal decubitus, with duration of five seconds. The individuals were verbally encouraged to try to perform twice the trunk flexion movement and twice the hip flexion movement for performance of the MVCs, randomly performed. Velcro strips were used on three sites to stabilize the individual: i) at the xiphoid process level, ii) at the thigh medial portion, and iii) close to the knees10. The MVC with highest value in each situation was used for normalization of the electromyographic signs.
The hundred exercise was performed on mat and in the Reformer apparatus, while the teaser was on mat and in the Cadillac apparatus11. The position kept for the hundred exercise may be seen in Figure 1. Both on mat and in the Reformer, the lower limbs are kept without contact with the plane by the maintenance of a light hip flexion. The cervical and upper part of the thoracic spine also performs flexion, not being in contact with the plane, so that the upper limbs are suspended in a position approximately parallel to the plane. In the hundred exercise only the low back and the lower part of the thoracic spine are in contact with the ground, while the arms perform an oscillation movement.
The position kept for the teaser exercise may be seen in Figure 2. Both on mat and in the Cadillac apparatus, there is maintenance of a hip flexion angle close to 90 degrees. The angulation of the lower limbs in relation to the plane is around 45 degrees, while the upper limbs are kept approximately parallel to the lower limbs. Due to the characteristics of the exercise, in the teaser hip flexion is more emphasized than in the hundred exercise, while the back flexion is minimized. In this exercise the low back is kept without contact with the support surface, on which only the gluteal region is in touch with the plane.
All situations (hundred on mat and in apparatus, teaser on mat and in apparatus) were considered isometric from the point of view of the monitored muscles, with the volunteer keeping her head, cervical and thoracic spine, as well as lower limbs with no contact with the ground, through the maintenance of a simultaneous hip and back flexion.
Each participant, starting from rest in dorsal decubitus, kept posture of each one of the exercises (figures 1 and 2), on mat or in the apparatus, returning to original position in 15 seconds. The five central seconds were considered for analysis, eliminating hence the concentric actions to reach the positioning and eccentric during the return to the starting position. The exercises were randomly performed for each participant and at least five minutes of interval between was kept. Since in the hundred exercise there is bombing of the arms series (shoulder flexo-extension movements of small amplitude) while posture is kept, it was asked to the volunteers to perform them in a rhythmic manner, but the frequency of the wrists was not controlled, allowing that each individual performed it according to their practice.
The electromyographic data were processed in the SAD32 software (version 2.61.07mp, 2002). A digital Butterworth pass band filter of third order with cutoff frequency between 20 and 500Hz was used. The central part of the performance of each exercise was cut and the root mean square (RMS) value referring to five seconds of the phase considered isometric was obtained. This value was normalized by the RMS value of the MVC of highest amplitude.
A t test was used for statistical analysis to verify the difference of activation between the right and left portions of the rectus abdominis muscle and between the two legs of the rectus femoris muscle. As there were not differences between the activation of the right and left sides, a simple arithmetic mean was performed to represent the "muscular group". Two-way ANOVA was used (muscular group and exercise) to verify differences in the electric activation in the different situations. Whenever necessary, Bonferroni post hoc was used. Significance level in all tests was of p < 0.05.
Significant difference was not found (p > 0.05) between the right and left sides, neither for the rectus abdominis portions nor for the rectus femoris muscles, which enabled grouping of the muscular portions. TFor analysis of the situation the RF muscle (rectus femoris: result of the mean of the right and left sides) and the RA muscle (rectus abdominis: result of the mean of the right and left portions) were considered.
Thus, considering the two muscles (RF and RA), difference has not been found between exercises (F(3.72)=0.493, p=0,689, ω2= 0.012), which means that there is not higher demand of any of the exercises when the joint activity of the analyzed muscles is considered. On the other hand, there was difference between the muscles (F(1.72)=19.128, p<0.001, ω2 = 0.146), where, in mean, the rectus femoris was more recruited in the analyzed exercises (Table 1). There was also significant interaction between muscles and exercises (F(3.72)=10.122, p<0.001, ω2 = 0.221), indicating that the difference found between the muscles is dependent on the performed exercise (Figure 3).
In this study the electric activation of the rectus abdominis and rectus femoris muscles was compared during the hundred exercise on mat and in the Reformer, and the teaser exercise on mat and in the Cadillac apparatus, of the Pilates method. In the initial analysis the comparison of the electric activation of the muscles between the right and left sides did not present differences, which enabled the grouping of the muscles of each side of the body. This symmetry in the electromyography is corroborated by data in the literature, in which Rutkowska-Kucharskaet al.12 found symmetry in the electric activation of trunk muscles during the performance of different abdominal exercises.
Considering the muscular right and left portions grouped, the statistical analysis identified significant difference in the electric activation between the muscles of different exercises, as well as dependence of the exercise for activation of the RF and RA muscles. However, difference has not been verified between the exercises when activation of the muscular groups together was considered.
The greater activation of the RF group in comparison to the RA group in the hundred, exercise, both in the Reformer and on mat, may be related to the fact that the low back is rested on mat during the exercise, simultaneously to the great resistance torque offered by the lower limbs in these exercises. Corroborating this statement, Sacco et al.6, when evaluating the hundred exercise on the mat and in the Reformer and Cadillac apparatus, showed that the torque of the lower limbs was always higher, both on mat and in the apparatus. Although strength and electromyography cannot be directly related, it is reasonable to suppose that greater resistance torque demands higher electric activation of the involved musculature13.
In the teaser exercise in the Cadillac, higher activation of the RA compared to the RF may be associated with the elastic resistance of the apparatus. In that case, lower activation of the RA group could be expected, since apparently, the hand grip would help in the maintenance of posture. Nevertheless, the elastic resistance which is connected to this grip would stop the upper part of the body, generating an extensor torque in the hip joint, which tends to increase the recruiting of the abdominal musculature. Moreover, the demand on the RF is minimized in that case, since the resistance torque offered by the lower limbs is reduced due to the more vertical legs position, which has also been evidenced by Sacco et al.6.
Outside the Pilates environment, Duncan14 compared the electric activation of the rectus abdominis muscle in different abdominal exercises, including the traditional one, in which the low back is kept on mat and only the thoracic spine lifts, with the 'jack knife' exercise, in which the entire back is lifted from the ground, including the low back. Greater activation of the abdominal musculature during the jack knife compared with the traditional exercise was found, which agrees with the results of this study.
On mat, Esco et al.15evaluated the electric activation of different groups of muscles during the performance of many exercises, including the hundred and teaser. These authors did not present the result of a statistical comparison between the muscles of each exercise or between exercises, but by the activation percentage data presented, rectus abdominis and rectus femoris had apparently similar activation. On the other hand, comparing the activation between exercises, both muscles had activation about 40% higher in the teaser than in the hundred on mat. In this study though, the rectus abdominis activation was significantly higher than in the rectus femoris in the hundred on mat, while there was not difference between the muscles in the teaser.
Within an applied context, these results can be used as a reference parameter when some emphasis on a given muscular group is expected.Thus, the hundred, should be the chosen exercise when the intention was greater activation of the rectus femoris muscle, both on mat and in the apparatus, while when wish is to obtain greater demand on the rectus abdominis muscle, the teaser in the Cadillac apparatus should be the exercise to be performed. Regardless of the choice, the level of activation of the assessed muscles is sufficient to provide physical fitness15. It is worth mentioning that only the rectus femoris and rectus abdominis muscles were evaluated. There may be some other occasional differences, in case other muscular groups are evaluated. In that perspective, new studies in which other muscles are monitored during the performance of these exercises should be carried out.
The rectus femoris muscular group presented higher activation levels in the hundred exercises performed on mat and in the Reformer, while the rectus abdominis muscular group presented higher activation during the teaser exercise performed in the Cadillac. In either of the exercises the activation levels are sufficient to provide physical fitness.
1. Muscolino JE, Cipriani S. Pilates and the "powerhouse" I. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2004;8:15-24. [ Links ]
2. Queiroz B, Cagliari M, Amorim C, Sacco I. Muscle Activation During Four Pilates Core Stability Exercises in Quadruped Position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:86-92. [ Links ]
3. Petrofsky J, Morris J, Bonacci J, Hanson A, Jorritsma R, Hill J. Muscle Use During Exercise: A Comparison of Conventional Weight Equipment to Pilates With and Without a Resistive Exercise Device. J Appl Res 2005;5:161. [ Links ]
4. Sorosky S, Stilp S, Akuthota V. Yoga and pilates in the management of low back pain. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008;1:39-47. [ Links ]
5. Caldwell K, Harrison M, Adams M, Triplett NT. Effect of Pilates and taiji quan training on self-efficacy, sleep quality, mood, and physical performance of college students. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2009;13:155-63. [ Links ]
6. Sacco ICN, Andrade MS, Souza PS, Nisiyama M, Cantuária AL, Maeda FYI, et al. Método Pilates em revista: aspectos biomecânicos de movimentos específicos para reestruturação postural-estudos de caso. Rev Bras Ci e Mov 2005;13:65-78. [ Links ]
7. Silva Y, Melo M, Gomes L, Bonezi A, Loss J. Analysis of the external resistance and electromyographic activity of hip extension performed according to the Pilates method. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009;13:82-8. [ Links ]
8. Loss JF, Melo MDO, Rosa CH, Santos ABD, Torre ML, Silva YOD. Electrical Activity Of External Obliques And Multifidus Muscles During. The Hip Flexion-Extension Exercise Performed In Cadillac With. Differents Adjustment of Springs And Individual Positions. Rev Bras. Fisioter 2010; 14(6):510-517. [ Links ]
9. Merletti R. Standards for reporting EMG data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 1999;9:3-4. [ Links ]
10. NG JKF, Kippers V, Parnianpour M, Richardson CA. EMG activity normalization for trunk muscles in subjects with and without back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:1082-6. [ Links ]
11. Pilates JH, Miller WJ. The Complete Writings of Joseph H. Pilates: Return to Life Through Contrology and Your Health. Ed. BainBridge Books: West Yorkshire; 2000. [ Links ]
12. Rutkowska-Kucharska A, Szpala A, Pieciuk E. Symmetry of muscle activity during abdominal exercises. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2009;11:25-30. [ Links ]
13. Loss J, Candotti C. Comparative study between two elbow flexion exercises using the estimated resultant muscle force. Rev Bras Fisioter 2008;12:502-10. [ Links ]
14. Duncan M. Muscle activity of the upper and lower rectus abdominis during exercises performed on and off a Swiss ball. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2009;13:364-7. [ Links ]
15. Esco M, Olson M, Martin R, Woollen E, Elllis M, Williford H. Abdominal EMG of Selected Pilates' Mat Exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:S357. [ Links ]
Mailing address: All authors have declared the reis not any potential
conflict of interests concerning this article.
Jefferson Fagundes Loss
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Rua Felizardo, 750, Jardim Botânico
90690-200 Porto Alegre, RS
All authors have declared the reis not any potential conflict of interests concerning this article.