SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.19 número2Influência dos fatores socioeconômicos na percepção de sintomas cócleo-vestibulares e na adesão ao tratamento do hipotireoidismo congênitoAutonomia do enfermeiro obstetra na assistência ao parto de risco habitual índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados




Links relacionados


Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil

versão impressa ISSN 1519-3829versão On-line ISSN 1806-9304

Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant. vol.19 no.2 Recife abr./jun. 2019  Epub 22-Jul-2019 


Evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Health Care in Brazil

Ana Carolina Cunha1

Josimari Telino de Lacerda2

Mônica Teresa Ruocco Alcauza3

Sônia Natal4

1-4Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, s/n. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. CEP 88040-900. E-mail:



to evaluate prenatal care in Primary Care by identifying the aspects that influence structural and operational adequacy.


evaluation research with analysis of 4,059 municipalities that joined the 2nd cycle of the Program for Improving Access and Quality in Primary Care in 2013-2014. The evaluative model composed of 19 indicators grouped in structural aspects and operational aspects dimensions was validated in a consensus conference. Data analysis was descriptive, with the issuance of value judgment.


in structural aspects, 32.6% of the municipalities presented adequacy, whilst in operational ones, only 24.1%. In the general prenatal evaluation, less than a quarter (24.6%) of the municipalities was adequate, those with up to 10 thousand inhabitants had a higher percentage of adequacy (41.6%). The South region presented adequacy of 33.8%, considering all sizes.


most municipalities presented low adequacy in prenatal care, with better performance of structural aspects. Smaller municipalities presented better results in all analyzed items. Structural aspects and general evaluation of prenatal care are highlighted in the South region. Adequate attention to prenatal care needs to be comprehensive and equitable, with the strengthening of regional networks geared towards social inclusion.

Key words Health evaluation; Primary health care; Quality assurance; Health care


Prenatal care includes health education actions, risk identification, prevention and treatment of complications and diseases, requiring planning and structuring to guarantee access and continuity of care with effective comprehensiveness of care, in order to promote mother and child health.1,2

Low-risk prenatal care is configured as one of the main programmatic actions carried out in Primary Care (PC). The whole process of women's health care is influenced by the social, economic and cultural context of the environment in which pregnant women and concepts live. Structural and operational aspects must be guaranteed for continuous and quality monitoring, with humanized care to pregnancy. Prenatal care involves a warm relationship and the systematic follow-up of the pregnant woman contributes to the early detection of diseases and gestational risk, preparation for childbirth and establishment of a bond with motherhood.3

The inadequacy of prenatal care actions is associated with negative effects such as prematurity and low birth weight, in addition to increased risk of fetal and maternal death, hospitalizations in intensive care units, postpartum depression and anxiety, and successive pregnancies in a short time.4,5

In Brazil, there has been an increase in coverage of prenatal care in the last years in most of the country,6,7 coinciding with the institutionalization of actions aimed at the comprehensiveness of care, proposed from different national programs in the period from 1984 to 2011. Despite this, the challenges persist with a high level of inadequacy of actions, endangering maternal and child health.6

High child mortality rates, with a higher concentration of deaths in the early neonatal components,2,8 and the still high maternal mortality rate (58 maternal deaths out of 100 thousand live births), with expressive disparities in the country,9 reinforce the existence of failures in the care provided.

The institutionalization of prenatal care evaluation is a fundamental strategy for the improvement of quality with consequent reduction of maternal and infant morbimortality,10 since it reveals and produces subsidies for awareness and confrontation with failures, reviewing public policies and managerial and procedural adaptations, in order to respond more adequately and with immediate solution the needs of this population group. Studies that evaluated prenatal care with national coverage observed inadequacies in relation to the recommended6,10,11 and had as a unit of analysis users11 and PC6,10 teams, and it was necessary to advance in the aspects of municipal management responsibility.

Accordingly, the objective of this study was to evaluate prenatal care in PC by identifying the aspects that influence structural and operational adequacy, with a focus on management, having the Brazilian municipalities as a unit of analysis.


Evaluative study, of quantitative based approach of the low risk prenatal care having as analysis units the Brazilian municipalities that participated in the external evaluation of the Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care (PMAQ - AB), in 2013 - 2014.

The municipalities that have joined with at least 80% of the teams in the 2nd cycle of PMAQ - AB were included, and responded to modules I and II. The sample consisted of 4,059 municipalities, 19,849 Basic Health Units (BHU) and 24,626 participants in the Family Health Strategy (FHS).

The theoretical-logical model and the matrix of analysis and judgment are based on documental and bibliographic research pertinent to the theme. The main documents used were the ordinance that established the Stork Network (2011) and the Technical Standards and Manuals of the series of Notebooks of Primary Care n° 18, n° 26 and n° 32: HIV/Aids, hepatitis and other sexually transmitted diseases (2006), Sexual health and reproductive health (2010) and Attention to low risk prenatal care (2013), respectively.

The evaluative model was validated in Consensus Conference, in two stages: distance and face-to-face meeting. A group of eight experts from the field of women's health and/or public policy evaluation participated in the two phases. The model was emailed and the experts were invited to give their full, partial agreement or disagreement within 15 days. The researchers consolidated the answers and cases of discordance were the subject of debate in the face-to-face meeting. All suggestions were included from consensus.

The analysis and judgment matrix has two dimensions, six sub-dimensions, 19 indicators and 30 measures. The "structural aspects" dimension analyzes the conditions of infrastructure, human resources and standardization of care that give the conditions for the teams to carry out their activities. The "operational aspects" dimension analyzes the activities carried out by the teams, focusing on the organization of care, promotion and prevention and follow-up (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1 Analysis and judgment matrix of structural aspects of the evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Care. Brazil, 2017. 

Evaluative matrix Measures Judgment Parameters
Structural aspects
Infrastructure ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0)
Adequacy of the physical space % BHU with nursing office and waiting room 89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Materials and equipment for prenatal care % UBS that makes available a pregnant woman's booklet ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations= minimally adequate (0.5)
% BHU with availability of equipment and furniture for prenatal care ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Inputs and medicines % BHU with supply of important vaccines for the prenatal period ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations= little adequate (0.5)
% BHU with availability of essential medicines for the gestational period ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Human resources
Adequacy of staff % FHS with complete minimum health staff* Dichotomous analysis, according to population size. Parameter to "adequate"
Up to 50 thousand inhab. = 100%
>50 to 100 thousand inhab. = 90%
>100 to 500 thousand inhab. = 85%
> 500 thousand inhab. = 60%
Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations= little adequate (0.5)
% FHS with oral health* Dichotomous analysis, according to population size. Parameter to "adequate"
Up to 25 thousand inhab. = 100%
>25 to 50 thousand inhab. = 90%
>50 to 100 thousand inhab. = 85%
>100 to 500 thousand inhab. = 75%
>500 thousand inhab. = 60%
Structural aspects
Human resources
Population coverage % population with coverage of the FHS*** Dichotomous analysis, according to population size. Parameter to "adequate" (1.0)
Up to 25 thousand inhab. = 100%
>25 to 50 thousand inhab. = 85%
>50 to 100 thousand inhab. = 65%
>100 to 500 thousand inhab. = 55%
>500 thousand inhab. = 40%
Specialized support % FHS which receives support from experts ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0)
89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Standardization of care Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Normatization of care % FHS which uses protocols for prenatal risk stratification ≥90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations = little adequate (0.5)
% FHS that has protocols with definition of guidelines to host the pregnant woman ≥90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Updated information % FHS that monthly feed the prenatal information system % FHS with cytopathological collection record ≥90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate

*Parameters defined according to the tertile distribution for each population size stratum

**Data collected on the site of the CNES, BHU= Basic Health Unit, FHS= Family Health Strategy.

Table 2 Analysis and judgment matrix of the operational aspects of the evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Care. Brazil, 2017. 

Evaluative matrix Measures Judgment parameters
Operational aspects
Organization of care
Appropriation of territory % FHS with registration of all pregnant women in the territory ≥90% = adequate (1.0)
89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Early capture % FHS that perform an active search of pregnant women for prenatal care ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0)
89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Adequate access % FHS that have extended working hours ** Dichotomous analysis, according to population size. Parameter for "Adequate" (1.0)
Up to 10 thousand inhab. = 100%
>10 thousand inhab. = 80%
Programming of care % FHS that offer scheduled prenatal consultations ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both Adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations = little adequate (0.5)
% FHS that have agenda scheduling according to gestational risk ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Promotion and prevention
Early diagnosis % FHS that request the rapid pregnancy test ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
All adequate = adequate (1.0)
All inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations = minimally adequate (0.5)
% FHS that request the rapid HIV test ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
% FHS that request the rapid syphilis test ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Operational aspects
Promotion and prevention
Immunization % FHS that register the up to date vaccination of the pregnant woman ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0)
89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Identification of diseases % FHS that request prenatal exams ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations = minimally adequate (0.5)
% FHS that receive the examinations in a timely manner for necessary interventions ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Health education % FHS that offer educational and health promotion actions for pregnant women ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0) 89 to
75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Follow-up of the gestational cycle Proportion of LB of mothers with seven or more prenatal visits*** ≥ 90% = adequate (1.0)
89 to 75% = minimally adequate (0.5)
<75% = inadequate (0.0)
Reference and counter-reference % FHS that maintains a register of higher risk pregnant women referred to other points of care ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Both adequate= adequate (1.0)
Both inadequate= inadequate (0.0)
Other situations = minimally adequate (0.5)
% FHS that receive the counter-referral of maternity hospitals ≥ 90% = adequate;
89 to 75% = minimally adequate;
<75% = inadequate
Continuity of care % FHS which conducted puerperium consultations up to 10 days after delivery ≥ 90% = adequado;
89 a 75% = pouco adequado;
<75% = inadequado

**Parameters defined according to the quartile distribution for each population size stratum

***Data collected on the website of Sinasc, BHU= Basic Health Unit, FHS = Family Health Strategy, HIV= Human Immunodeficiency Virus, LB= Live Births.

In addition to the PMAQ - AB database, the official sites of the Live Birth Information System (Sinasc), the National Registry of Health Establishments (CNES) and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) were used as sources of evidence.

The parameters for the issuing of value judgments that guided the descriptive analysis were defined based on literature review, documentary research and the fact that all actions chosen were well founded, based on scientific evidence and recommended in official documents for at least five years. (Tables 1 and 2).

In the analysis of the measures it was considered adequate when in the municipality at least 90% of the BHU or FHS teams performed the action (s); inadequate when less than 75% of the BHU or FHS teams performed the action (s); and minimally adequate, in the rest of the cases. There was an exception in four measures: for minimum adequate FHS team, FHS teams with oral health and population coverage, the parameters were defined by population size, by tertile distribution, and for extended hours of operation, they were also defined by population size, but by quartile distribution.

Data were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel® and SPSS 22.0 software and presented in tabular form.

For indicators with more than one measure it was considered adequate when all measures were classified as adequate, inadequate when all measures were classified as inadequate and the other situations, as minimally adequate.

Initially, measures and indicators were analyzed and, in the aftermath, the conversion into scores 1.0 (adequate) 0.5 (a) and 0.0 (inadequate) was made. The analysis was guided by the sum of the scores, followed by the calculation of the percentage of points obtained compared to the maximum score expected in each of the components, as follows: (Σ obtained / Σ expected) x100. For the value judgment of dimensions, the cut-off points used were: adequate (100%-75% of the expected), inadequate (less than or equal to 50% of the expected) and the other cases were minimally adequate, received weight two, considering it with greater influence on the adequacy of attention.

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (CEPSH/UFSC), Opinion n° 1.599.464. CAAE n° 53671016.1.1001.0121.


The study analyzed 72.9% of the total number of Brazilian municipalities, predominantly with a population size of less than 25 thousand inhabitants (78.8%), with less than one quarter (24.6%) presenting an adequate prenatal care.

In Table 3, it is observed that the structural aspects dimension 39.1% of the municipalities was classified as minimally adequate. In the analysis of the infrastructure, the physical space presented more than half of the adequate municipalities (69.6%). Regarding human resources, a positive highlight was the specialized support with 86.4% of the municipalities offering specialist support to the PC teams and for the population coverage that showed adequacy in 53.3% of the municipalities. The standardization of care was the subdimension with the highest percentage of inadequate municipalities (62.0%), especially in the standardization of care indicator.

Table 3 Classification of municipalities in the evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Care according to components, dimensions and subdimension Brazil, 2017. 

Components A LA I
n % n % n %
Structural Aspects 1323 32.6 1587 39.1 1149 28.3
Infrastructure 1442 35.5 1130 27.8 1487 36.6
Adequacy of physical space 2825 69.6 485 11.9 749 18.5
Materials and equipment 1735 42.7 2040 50.3 284 7.0
Inputs and medicines 1116 27.5 1898 46.8 1045 25.7
Human Resources 1515 37.3 1063 26.2 1481 36.5
Staff Adequacy 1476 36.4 1542 38.0 1041 25.6
Population coverage 2164 53.3 - - 1895 46.7
Specialized Support 3509 86.4 273 6.7 277 6.8
Standardization of care 1543 38.0 - - 2516 62.0
Normatization of care 900 22.2 1557 38.4 1602 39.5
Updated information 1811 44.6 2030 50.0 218 5.4
Operational Aspects 977 24.1 1994 49.1 1088 26.8
Organization of care 1956 48.2 704 17.3 1399 34.5
Appropriation of territory 3340 82.3 321 7.9 398 9.8
Early Capture 2310 56.9 563 13.9 1186 29.2
Adequate access 1464 36.1 - - 2595 63.9
Programming of care 2226 54.8 1515 37.3 318 7.8
Promotion and prevention 1985 48.9 823 20.3 1251 30.8
Early diagnosis 916 22.6 1668 41.1 1475 36.3
Immunization 3401 83.8 312 7.7 346 8.5
Identification of diseases 1670 41.1 1972 48.6 417 10.3
Health education 2451 60.4 561 13.8 1047 25.8
Follow-up 551 13.6 1125 27.7 2383 58.7
Gestational follow-up 185 4.6 1244 30.6 2630 64.8
Reference and counter-reference 1093 26.9 2737 67.4 229 5.6
Continuity of care 3041 74.9 462 11.4 556 13.7
General Evaluation of Prenatal Care 997 24.6 2153 53.0 909 22.4

A= Adequate, LA= Minimally adequate, I= Inadequate.

The classification in the dimension of operational aspects was minimally adequate in 49.1% of the municipalities. In the organization of the care, the appropriation of the territory (82.3%) and the early capture (56.9%) were indicators with the highest percentages of adequacy. While in the access indicator 63.9% of the municipalities were inadequate, that is, they do not have health units with an extended working period. In the analysis of promotion and prevention actions, a low percentage of municipalities (22.6%) presented adequacy in the early diagnosis of pregnancy, HIV and syphilis. In the follow-up subdimension, most municipalities (58.7%) were inadequate, especially in gestational follow-up (64.8%). In contrast, the continuity of care is within the expected level in 74.9% of the municipalities.

With regard to the population size and regional location (Tables 4 and 5), municipalities with up to 10,000 inhabitants achieved better results in structural aspects (50.8%), operational aspects (38.6%) and general prenatal evaluation (41.6%), compared to the others. Regarding location, the worst results were observed in the North region in all items analyzed. The Southeast region presented adequacy in operational aspects and the South region in structural aspects and the general prenatal evaluation.

Table 4 Evaluation of structural, operational aspects and overall evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Care, according to population size. Brazil, 2017. 

Population size (inhabitants) A LA I p
n % n % n %
Structural aspects <0.001*
Up to 10 thousand 990 50.8 692 35.5 267 13.7
10 to 25 thousand 214 17.1 569 45.6 466 37.3
25 to 50 thousand 64 13.6 176 37.5 229 48.8
>50 thousand 55 14.0 150 38.3 187 47.7
Operational aspects
Up to 10 thousand 752 38.6 854 43.8 343 17.6 <0.001*
10 to 25 thousand 120 9.6 677 54.2 452 36.2
25 to 50 thousand 51 10.9 247 52.7 171 36.5
>50 thousand 54 13.8 216 55.1 122 31.1
General evaluation of prenatal care
Up to 10 thousand 810 41.6 876 44.9 263 13.5 < 0.001*
10 to 25 thousand 106 8.5 760 60.8 383 30.7
25 to 50 thousand 41 8.7 273 58.2 155 33.0
>50 thousand 40 10.2 244 62.2 108 27.6

*Pearson's Chi-square test, A= Adequate, LA= Minimally adequate, I= Inadequate.

Table 5 Evaluation of structural, operational aspects and overall evaluation of prenatal care in Primary Care, according to regions. Brazil, 2017. 

Regions A LA I p
n % n % n %
Structural aspects <0.001*
North 61 22.7 84 31.2 124 46.1
Northeast 431 34.2 576 45.6 255 20.2
Center-west 95 24.1 156 39.6 143 36.3
Southeast 393 31.8 477 38.6 367 29.7
South 343 38.2 294 32.8 260 29.0
Operational aspects <0.001*
North 33 12.3 133 49.4 103 38.3
Northeast 143 11.3 707 56.0 412 32.6
Center-west 87 22.1 202 51.3 105 26.6
Southeast 420 34.0 535 43.2 282 22.8
South 294 32.8 417 46.5 186 20.7
General evaluation of prenatal care <0.001*
North 39 14.5 133 49.4 97 36.1
Northeast 180 14.3 773 61.3 309 24.5
Center-west 89 22.6 201 51.0 104 26.4
Southeast 386 31.2 619 50.0 232 18.8
South 303 33.8 427 47.6 167 18.6

*Pearson's Chi-square test, A= Adequate, LA= Minimally adequate, I= Inadequate.


The analysis of this study reveals relevant data on prenatal care under the responsibility of Brazilian municipalities. Less than a quarter of the municipalities presented prenatal adequacy in PC, with worse conditions in the ones with larger population size and located in the North region.

Between the two dimensions analyzed, the structural aspects presented a greater number of municipalities classified as adequate. In the infrastructure analysis, financial incentives from the Ministry of Health offered to municipalities since 2011 for the reform, expansion and construction of BHU could have contributed to the result of adequacy of the physical space, with a view to improving working conditions, access and quality of PC.12

The high percentage of municipalities offering specialized support is another positive aspect in this dimension, since a care network must be activated in cases that exceed the competencies of the PC teams. In this network are the Family Health Support Center (NASF) and specialists who provide matrix support and care, fundamental to ensure qualified and resolutive clinical action. However, as in other studies,11,13 problems were identified in the adequacy of personnel and population coverage. These are extremely important factors in ensuring that the demands of the population are met without increased workload and with a satisfactory team-population relationship.14

In the subdimension of standardization of care, most municipalities were inadequate, differing from the findings of Luz et al.6. It is worth mentioning that the authors analyzed the availability of protocols, unlike the measure adopted in this study that included the information of its use. Municipal management needs to standardize care and encourage teams with respect to the use of clinical protocols for safe decision-making and quality in the care for pregnant women in all units and health services.

Operational aspects are fundamental for the comprehensive and equitable care of the mother / baby binomial. In the organization of care, teams must provide access and adherence to health services. Teams from the municipalities studied, mostly, have information of the territory, make early capture and offer scheduled appointments, according to the gestational risk. Such strategies are fundamental for continuous follow-up with a view to reducing risks and possible complications for the pregnant woman and the fetus.14,15 However, access to the BHU was inadequate, with almost two-thirds of the municipalities without an alternative schedule of care for the pregnant worker. Similar findings were reported by Silva MZN et al.15 corroborating the observation that the non-expansion of the opening hours of the units makes it difficult for pregnant women to access the service, as well as it threats their right to health.

Promotion and prevention actions ensure general health and well-being in the gestational period and include: early diagnosis, immunization, identification of diseases and health education. The findings on early diagnosis in this study deserve attention. Confirmation of pregnancy in the first months allows continuous follow-up, with more guidance and consultation, possibility of identification and appropriate treatment of diseases. Rapid tests of HIV and syphilis allow the immediate onset of follow-up as well as the prevention of vertical transmission of these diseases. The increase in the number of cases, especially syphilis in Brazil, reinforces the concern and demonstrates the importance of qualified prenatal care in PC.16

Women should be followed throughout the gestational and puerperal cycle, at different points in the network. The ideal number of consultations is a controversial topic, but it is a frequent indicator in studies evaluating prenatal care. Some countries consider four, six, ten and can reach 15 consultations, as in Finland.17

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) expanded the number of consultations from four to eight, based on the scientific evidence that related the increase in the number of meetings with a lower probability of stillborn children.1 In Brazil, the last recommendation, defined in 2011, is at least seven prenatal consultations, and was used in this analysis. The prevalence of accomplishment of seven or more prenatal visits has increased in the country over the years, from 43.7%, in 2000, to 61.1%, in 2010.18-21 Despite advances, more than half of municipalities (64.8%) were inadequate in this indicator, considering the judgment parameter defined in this study.

Follow-up at different points in the network has been regular in most municipalities and its effects on the monitoring of high-income pregnant women and the return from maternity are a concerning issue. On the other hand, postpartum care continuity was adequate in most municipalities. Nearly three-quarters of the municipalities have at least 90% of the teams performing puerperal consultation until the 10th day following the birth, similar to what was found by other authors.22,23 Concerning about the baby's health, calendar for vaccinations and early diagnosis tests, such as that of the foot, contribute to the return of puerperae to the unit during this period, and may justify the high percentage of adequacy of this indicator. Measures to improve network integration must be implemented in order to increase safety and improve outcomes in the follow-up of pregnant women.

The municipalities with larger population size showed the worst results compared to smaller ones, corroborating studies at the national level. Larger municipalities have more difficulties in equating public policy actions, while smaller ones are able to meet the basic needs of the population more easily.24,25 As well as that found by other researchers,4,11 the North region was the one that presented the worst results, requiring a development model committed to the reduction of regional inequalities and integration between levels of health care, combined with economic and social policies geared towards social inclusion.

In this study, an evaluation of prenatal care in PC was conducted with data from the PMAQ, using Brazilian municipalities as the unit of analysis. Limitations such as the use of secondary data made it difficult the deepening of the analysis. On the other hand, the exploration of data collected with public resources, in a research that adopted a qualified methodological process, is desirable. In the PMAQ, data collection is done with prior scheduling, interviewees are aware of the content of questions and it also provides financial contribution to the municipalities that meet established goals. Therefore, it would be expected to find slightly better results, which allows us to affirm that, in fact, data presented here can represent the Brazilian reality.

The reduction of maternal and child mortality rates is a global goal and it has been demanding from the managers actions that ensure equitable public policies and the strengthening of regional networks of care focused on social inclusion for decades.26

Most of municipalities in the country presented a low adequacy in prenatal care, even though the performance was better in structural aspects. It is recommended periodic prenatal evaluations to follow up and adopt measures that will improve the quality of this care.


1 World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO; 2016. [acesso em 26 jan 2019]. Disponível em:;jsessionid=18BB411AA9F40CFF591B9F90322FBA65?sequence=1Links ]

2 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Criança: orientações para implementação / Ministério da Saúde. Brasília, DF; 2018. 180 p.:il. [ Links ]

3 Sena IVA. Qualidade da Atenção Pré-Natal na Estratégia Saúde da Família: Revisão de Literatura. [internet]; 2014 [acesso em 19 jan 2019]. Disponível em: [ Links ]

4 Tsunechiro MA, Lima MOP, Bonadio IC, Corrêa MD, Silva AVA, Donato SCT. Avaliação da assistência pré-natal conforme o Programa de Humanização do Pré-natal e Nascimento. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2018; 18 (4): 781-90. [ Links ]

5 Heaman MI, Martens PJ, Brownell MD, Chartier MJ, Derksen SA, Helewa ME. The Association of Inadequate and Intensive Prenatal Care With Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Outcomes: A Population-Based Study in Manitoba, Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019. (No prelo). [ Links ]

6 Luz LA, Aquino R, Medina MG. Avaliação da qualidade da Atenção Pré-Natal no Brasil. Saúde debate. 2018; 42 (n. spe2): 111-26. [ Links ]

7 Nunes JT, Gomes KRO, Rodrigues MTP, Mascarenhas MDM. Qualidade da assistência pré-natal no Brasil: revisão de artigos publicados de 2005 a 2015. Cad Saúde Colet. 2016; 24 (2): 252-61. [ Links ]

8 França EB, Lansky S, Rego, MAS, Malta DC, França JS, Teixeira R. Principais causas da mortalidade na infância no Brasil, em 1990 e 2015: estimativas do estudo de Carga Global de Doença. Rev Bras Epidemiol (online). 2017; 20 (Suuppl 1): 46-60. [ Links ]

9 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde -DATASUS. Informação sobre nascidos vivos e óbitos maternos do ano de 2016. [acesso em 13 jul 2018]. Disponível em: [ Links ]

10 Guimaraes WSG, Parente RCP, Guimaraes TLF, Garnelo L. Acesso e qualidade da atenção pré-natal na Estratégia Saúde da Família: infraestrutura, cuidado e gestão. Cad Saúde Pública. 2018; 34 (5): e00110417. [ Links ]

11 Tomasi E, Fernandes PAA, Fischer T, Siqueira FCV, Silveira DS, Thumé E, Duro SMS, Saes MO, Nunes BP, Fassa AG, Facchini, LA. Qualidade da atenção pré-natal na rede básica de saúde do Brasil: indicadores e desigualdades sociais. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017; 33 (3): e00195815. [ Links ]

12 Brasil. Diário Oficial. Portaria nº 2.488, de 21 de outubro de 2011. Aprova a Política Nacional de Atenção Básica, estabelecendo a revisão de diretrizes e normas para a organização da Atenção Básica, para a Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) e o Programa de Agentes Comunitários de Saúde (PACS). Brasília, DF; n.204, p.55, 24 out. 2011; Seção 1, pt1. [ Links ]

13 Viellas EF, Domingues RM, Dias MA, Gama SG, Theme Filha MM, Costa JV, Bastos, MH, Leal, MC. Assistência pré-natal no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014; 30 (Suppl. 1): S85-S100. [ Links ]

14 Faria HP, Werneck MAF, Santos AS, Teixeira PF. Processo de trabalho em saúde: protocolo de cuidado à saúde e organização do serviço. 2 ed. Belo Horizonte: COOPMED; 2009. [ Links ]

15 Silva MZN, Andrade AB, Bosi MLM. Acesso e acolhimento no cuidado pré-natal à luz de experiências de gestantes na Atenção Básica. Saúde Debate. 2014; 38 (103): 805-16. [ Links ]

16 Cruz RSBLC, Caminha MFC, Filho MB. Aspectos históricos, conceituais e organizativos do Pré-natal. Rev Bras Saúde. 2014; 18(1): 87-94. [ Links ]

17 Silva EP, Lima RT, Costa MJC, Batista Filho M. Desenvolvimento e aplicação de um novo índice para avaliação do pré-natal. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2013; 33 (5): 356-62. [ Links ]

18 César JA, Mendonza-Sassi RA, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Mano PS, Goulart Filho SM. Características sociodemográficas e de assistência à gestação e ao parto no extremo sul do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2011; 27 (5): 985-94. [ Links ]

19 Anversa ETR, Bastos GAN, Nunes LN, Dal Pizzol TDS. Qualidade do processo da assistência pré-natal: unidades básicas de saúde e unidades de Estratégia Saúde da Família em município no Sul do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2012; 28 (4): 789-800. [ Links ]

20 Brasil. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. Estudos e Pesquisas: informação demográfica e socioeconômica número 32. Síntese de Indicadores Sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira 2013. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. [ Links ]

21 Anjos JC, Boing AF. Diferenças regionais e fatores associados ao número de consultas de pré-natal no Brasil: análise do Sistema de Informações sobre Nascidos Vivos em 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016; 19 (4): 835-50. [ Links ]

22 Oliveira RLA, Fonseca CRB, Carvalhaes MABL, Parada CMGL. Avaliação da atenção pré-natal na perspectiva dos diferentes modelos na atenção primária. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2013; 21 (2): 1-8. [ Links ]

23 Corrêa MD, Tsunechiro MA, Lima MOP, Bonadio IC. Avaliação da assistência pré-natal em unidade com estratégia saúde da família. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014; 48 (Esp): 24-32. [ Links ]

24 Calvo MCM, Lacerda JT, Colussi CF, Schneider IJC, Rocha TAH. Estratificação de municípios brasileiros para avaliação de desempenho em saúde. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2016; 25 (4): 767-76. [ Links ]

25 Domingues RMSM, Viellas, EF, Dias, MAB, Torres JÁ, Theme-Filha MM, Gama SGN, Leal, MC. Adequação da assistência pré-natal segundo as características maternas no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2015; 37 (3): 140- 7. [ Links ]

26 Dourado DA, Elias PEM. Regionalização e dinâmica política do federalismo sanitário brasileiro. Rev Saude Pública. 2011; 45 (1): 204-11. [ Links ]

Received: August 15, 2018; Revised: April 25, 2019; Accepted: May 09, 2019

Authors' Contribution

Cunha AC e Lacerda JT - preparation of the manuscript, search in databases, data collection and analysis, writing, conducting and review. Alcauza MTR and Natal S - writing and review of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.