Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Natural Occurrence of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium, Beauveria and Paecilomyces in Soybean Under Till and No-till Cultivation Systems

Ocorrência Natural de Fungos Entomopatogênicos Metarhizium, Beauveria e Paecilomyces na Cultura da Soja sob Plantio Direto e Convencional

Abstracts

The occurrence of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium, Beauveria and Paecilomyces in soybean under till and no-till cultivation systems was studied. The number of colony forming units per g of soil and per cm² of leaf area was determined. Soil under no-till system showed a higher incidence of entomopathogenic fungi, but no difference in fungal density was observed on leaves. Thus the probability of infection for susceptible leaf inhabiting insects should be similar in both systems.

Epizootiology; Deuteromycetes; Moniliaceae; microbial control


A ocorrência de fungos entomopatogênicos Metarhizium, Beauveria e Paecilomyces foi estudada em condições de semeadura direta e convencional da soja. Foi determinada a densidade de unidades formadoras de colônia por g de solo e por cm² de folíolos de soja. Verificou-se que no solo sob semeadura direta ocorreu maior incidência dos entomopatógenos, mas sobre os folíolos essa diferença não ocorreu, proporcionando as mesmas possibilidades de infecção nos insetos da parte aérea suscetíveis que ocorrem nas duas condições de cultivo.

Epizootiologia; Deuteromicetos; Moniliaceae; controle microbiano


a11v30n3

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

Natural Occurrence of the Entomopathogenic Fungi Metarhizium, Beauveria and Paecilomyces in Soybean Under Till and No-till Cultivation Systems

DANIEL R. SOSA-GÓMEZ1, KATIAÍRES E. DELPIN 2, FLÁVIO MOSCARDI1 AND JOSÉ R. B. FARIAS1

1 Embrapa Soja, Caixa postal 231, 86001-970, Londrina, PR

2Pronex, Núcleo de Manejo Integrado de Pragas

Ocorrência Natural de Fungos Entomopatogênicos Metarhizium, Beauveria e Paecilomyces na Cultura da Soja sob Plantio Direto e Convencional

RESUMO - A ocorrência de fungos entomopatogênicos Metarhizium, Beauveria e Paecilomyces foi estudada em condições de semeadura direta e convencional da soja. Foi determinada a densidade de unidades formadoras de colônia por g de solo e por cm2 de folíolos de soja. Verificou-se que no solo sob semeadura direta ocorreu maior incidência dos entomopatógenos, mas sobre os folíolos essa diferença não ocorreu, proporcionando as mesmas possibilidades de infecção nos insetos da parte aérea suscetíveis que ocorrem nas duas condições de cultivo.

PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Epizootiologia, Deuteromicetos, Moniliaceae, controle microbiano.

ABSTRACT - The occurrence of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium, Beauveria and Paecilomyces in soybean under till and no-till cultivation systems was studied. The number of colony forming units per g of soil and per cm2 of leaf area was determined. Soil under no-till system showed a higher incidence of entomopathogenic fungi, but no difference in fungal density was observed on leaves. Thus the probability of infection for susceptible leaf inhabiting insects should be similar in both systems.

KEY WORDS: Epizootiology, Deuteromycetes, Moniliaceae, microbial control.

In Brazil, the most prevalent pathogens that attack insects and mites in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) agroecosystems are the entomopathogenic fungi. In addition to the most common species referred by Sosa-Gómez & Moscardi (1994), Paecilomyces amoenoroseus (Hennings) Samson occurs on Lagria villosa Fabr. (Coleoptera: Lagriidae); Neozygites sp. on the two-spotted mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch; Paecilomyces fumosoroseus (Wize) Brown & Smith, Aschersonia aleyrodis Webber, and an undescribed species of Entomophthorales attack whiteflies, probably Bemisia argentifolii Bellows & Perring (D.R. Sosa-Gómez, unpub.). The occurrence and persistence of entomopathogenic fungi can be affected by cultural practices, such as planting date (Sprenkel et al. 1979), pesticide applications (Horton et al. 1980), and fertilizers (Rosin et al. 1996). The soil populations of some fungi are affected by the soybean cultivation system (Sosa-Gómez & Moscardi 1994), but it is unknown if this effect will also occur on aerial parts of the soybean plant, where insects rest, bask or feed and may come in contact with soil-borne infectious fungal inocula. Our objective was to study the effect of till and no-till cultivation practices on the natural density of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium, Paecilomyces and Beauveria on soybean leaves, as related to their occurrence in the soil.

Material and Methods

The experiment was set up in two contiguous plots of 22 x 312 m, in Londrina, State of Paraná, Brazil. One plot was under no-till cultivation and the other under conventional tillage (ploughed once and disc harrowed twice) during the growing seasons of 1992/93 and 1997/98. Soybean in the summer, and wheat or oat in the winter, had been planted on both areas since 1985. Each area was divided into 15 subplots of 20 m x 20.8 m.

One leaflet from each subplot was sampled weekly at half of plant height (15 replicates) in both areas. Soil samples were taken in a similar manner, but at each random sampling point (0.36 m2) five subsamples of approximately 0.5-0.8 g were collected inside this area and mixed thoroughly in the laboratory. Using a spoon, these samples were taken within the top 2 cm of soil, because the majority of fungal inocula are usually concentrated in this soil layer (Ignoffo et al. 1977, Storey et al. 1989). One-gram aliquots were taken per sample (the five subsamples were pooled) and suspended in 9 ml of sterile distilled water plus Tween 80 at 0.01%. The resulting suspensions were serially diluted (10-2 and 10-3) and plated on dodine-based selective medium (Chase et al. 1986) with dodine at 290 mg per ml. After three weeks incubation at 26±1°C, in darkness, the fungal growth was assessed to quantify the number of colony forming units (CFU). Other one-gram aliquots were used to determine the soil dry weight, estimated after heating at 110°C until constant weight.

The leaflets were washed individually in 10 ml of water plus Tween 80 at 0.01%, and then plated for CFU determination on the same selective medium. The series of means (CFU per g of dry soil or per mm2 of foliar surface) obtained weekly from till and no-till plots were compared by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test, using the Sigmastat statistical software (Siegel 1975, Jandel Scientific 1994). When the postulates of normality and homogeneity were fulfilled, the "t" test was applied. Throughout both seasons, precipitation was recorded in the experimental site once a day.

Results and Discussion

The fungal species isolated were Metarhizium anisopliae, Beauveria bassiana and Paecilomyces lilacinus. The number of samples collected were too large to permit the identification of all colonies to species, so they were only identified to genera. In the soil samples higher CFU densities of Metarhizium spp. (T = 376.5, P = 0.007, Fig. 1) and Paecilomyces spp. (t test =1.71, P= 0.12, Fig.1 and t test = 3.08, P=0.004, Fig. 2) were observed under the no-till system. However, no significant differences in Beauveria spp. densities were observed between till and no-till systems, in both seasons. Sosa-Gómez & Moscardi (1994) observed that no-till cultivation favored the prevalence of Metarhizium, Beauveria and Paecilomyces in the soil compared with areas under conventional tillage. In several cases, the temporal occurrence of CFUs of Metarhizium spp. in the soil, under no till, was higher than that observed for Beauveria spp. (1992/93 season, T = 374.5, P = 0.008, Fig. 1, and 1997/98 season, T= 218, P=0.006, Fig. 2), that means higher probabilities of fungal infection with M. anisopliae, for insects equally susceptible to both pathogens.



At the canopy level, for soybean conventional tillage in the 1992/3 season, higher numbers of CFUs of Beauveria spp. (T=366, P=0.02) and Metarhizium spp. (T=366, P=0.02) were observed than for Paecilomyces spp. (Fig. 1). These differences were not so evident in the 1997/8 season, since the Mann Whitney tests were significant at P=0.09 and P=0.17, respectively (Fig. 2). The differential recovery of CFU could be due to different responses to the culture media by the fungal species. On leaves, the number of CFU was similar in both cultivation systems for both soybean seasons. Thus, the differences observed between the no-till and tillage systems regarding incidence of fungi in the soil, in this study or previously by Sosa-Gómez & Moscardi (1994), did not occur on soybean leaves, indicating the same probability of infection of susceptible insects on the plants, for both cultivation systems. The higher densities of fungi observed in the soil could be due to extensive saprophytic growth (Callot et al. 1996) favored by the microclimatic conditions of no-till cultivation. At the canopy level, these conditions are probably the same in both areas not affecting the inocula density. Another reason for the lack of differences between CFU in the aerial part of the plants could be an inefficient mechanism of displacement of fungal propagules from soil to plant, considering that the soil in the no-till conditions remains undisturbed. Young and Yearian (1986) observed that most inoculum of Anticarsia gemmatalis nucleopolyhedrovirus on plants was in the lower portion of the soybean canopy, and the tillage appeared to increase the concentration of the pathogen on this part of the plant. Perhaps, rainfall and tillage can increase CFU concentration on leaves close to the soil, but samples at this plant portion were not taken in the present study.

The total amount of rain in the 1992/3 season (807mm, mean = 7.14mm day-1) was higher than in the 1997/8 season (592mm, mean = 6.05mm day-1), and this could account for the higher prevalence of the fungi in the 1992/3 season. On leaves and in soil, Metarhizium spp. usually reached the maximum level in December and January. On the other hand, the highest density of Beauveria spp. was commonly observed in February and March (Figs. 1 and 2). Significantly, Beauveria bassiana is an important cause of mortality of adults of Chrysomelid beetles such as Cerotoma sp., Colaspis sp. and Diabrotica sp., at this time of the year (D.R. Sosa-Gómez, unpubl.). It must be taken into consideration that differences between species of entomopathogenic fungi or even between strains may be attributed to differential recovery in the culture medium. However, Liu et al. (1993) observed no evidence of this, at least among Metarhizium species. If this effect really occurs it should not be so important because in other seasons, more B. bassiana was recovered from the soil than M. anisopliae (Sosa-Gómez & Moscardi 1994).

In summary, the differences observed between the CFU densities of entomopathogenic fungi occurring in the soil, under no-till and till conditions, are not reflected at the canopy level. Therefore, the probabilities of phylloplane inhabiting insects becoming infected by these fungi are the same, regardless of the tillage system. Under these experimental conditions, M. anisopliae and B. bassiana were more prevalent than P. lilacinus. A deeper knowledge on the natural densities of entomopathogenic fungi in soil and how they are related to densities on leaves can contribute to a better understanding about the epizootiology of these fungal diseases on insect populations.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Roberto M. Pereira (Entomology and Plant Pathology Department, Knoxville, University of Tennessee) and Dr. Alexandre J. Cattelan (Embrapa Soja) for reviewing the manuscript and José Jairo da Silva for his technical assistance. This research has received financial support from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Brasil (CNPq), Embrapa Soja, and the Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência (Pronex/MCT). This paper was approved for publication by the Technical Director of Embrapa Soja as manuscript number 36/98.

Literature Cited

Received 13/II/01. Accepted 10/VIII/01.

  • Callot, G., B. Vercambre, C. Neuveglise & G. Riba. 1996. Hyphasmata and conidial pellets: an original morphological aspect of soil colonization by Beauveria brongniartii J.. Invertebr. Pathol. 68: 173-176.
  • Chase, A.R., L.S. Osborne & V.M. Ferguson. 1986. Selective isolation of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae from an artificial potting medium. Fla. Entomol. 69: 285-292.
  • Horton, D.L., G.R. Carner & S.G. Turnipseed. 1980. Pesticide inhibition of the entomogenous fungus Nomuraea rileyi in soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 9: 304-308.
  • Ignoffo, C.M., C. Garcia, D.L. Hostetter & R.E. Pinnell. 1977. Vertical movement of conidia of Nomuraea rileyi through sand and loam soils. J. Econ. Entomol. 70: 163-164.
  • Jandel Scientific. 1994. Sigmastat statistical software, User's manual. San Rafael, California, Jandel Scientific. 831p.
  • Liu, Z.Y., R.J. Milner, C.F. McRae & G.G. Lutton. 1993. The use of dodine in selective media for the isolation of Metarhizium spp. from soil. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 62: 248-251.
  • Rosin, F., D.I. Shapiro & L.C. Lewis. 1996. Effects of fertilizers on the survival of Beauveria bassiana J. Invertebr. Pathol. 68: 194-195.
  • Siegel, S. 1975 Estatística năo paramétrica para as cięncias do comportamento. Săo Paulo, McGraw-Hill. 350p.
  • Sosa-Gómez, D.R. & F. Moscardi. 1994. Effect of till and no-till soybean cultivation on dynamics of entomopathogenic fungi in the soil. Fla. Entomol. 77: 284-287.
  • Sprenkel, R.K., W.M. Brooks, J.W. Van Duyn & L.L. Deitz. 1979. The effects of three cultural variables on the incidence of Nomuraea rileyi, phytophagous Lepidoptera, and their predators on soybeans in North Carolina. Environ. Entomol. 8: 334-339.
  • Storey, G.K., W.A. Gardner & E.W. Tollner. 1989. Penetration and persistence of commercially formulated Beauveriabassiana conidia in soil of two tillage systems. Environ. Entomol.18: 835-839.
  • Young, S.Y. & W.C. Yearian. 1986. Movement of a nuclear polyhedrosis virus from soil to soybean and transmission in Anticarsia gemmatalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations on soybean. Environ. Entomol. 15: 573-580.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    17 June 2002
  • Date of issue
    Sept 2001

History

  • Accepted
    10 Aug 2001
  • Received
    13 Feb 2001
Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, R. Harry Prochet, 55, 86047-040 Londrina PR Brasil, Tel.: (55 43) 3342 3987 - Londrina - PR - Brazil
E-mail: editor@seb.org.br