SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue6Ant diversity (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from capões in Brazilian Pantanal: relationship between species richness and structural complexity author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Neotropical Entomology

Print version ISSN 1519-566X

Neotrop. Entomol. vol.35 no.6 Londrina Nov./Dec. 2006

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2006000600001 

ECOLOGY, BEHAVIOR AND BIONOMICS

 

Coleoptera associated with undisturbed cow pats in pastures in Southeastern Brazil

 

Coleoptera associados a massas fecais de bovinos em pastagens no sudeste brasileiro

 

 

Júlio MendesI; Arício X. LinharesII

ILab. Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Univ. Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia MG
IIDepto. Parasitologia, Instituto de Biologia, Univ. Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP

 

 


ABSTRACT

Coleoptera associated to undisturbed cattle droppings in pastures present great diversity and abundance. Several species are of primary veterinary importance for they may act as natural enemies of pest insects that breed in this habitat. To survey the diversity and abundance of Coleoptera associated to undisturbed cattle droppings, four undisturbed cattle dung pats naturally dropped in pastures and 5 cm of the soil immediately beneath them were collected almost all weekly from april 1992 to april 1994 in a farm located in the vicinity of São Carlos, State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. Beetles were collected from the pats both using Berlese funnels and by allowing the beetles to emerge for 30 to 40 days. A total of 24,332 specimens belonging to 13 beetle families and at least 66 species were identified. The most abundant and diverse families were Aphodiidae, Staphylinidae and Scarabaeidae. In general, the Coleoptera were more abundant in the warmer and wet period, from October to March, with a few exceptions. The importance of the beetles, both as horn fly natural enemies and as cattle dung decaying agents, is discussed.

Key words: Cattle dung, dung beetle, diversity, biological control


RESUMO

Coleoptera associados a fezes de gado bovino excretadas no pasto apresentam grande diversidade e abundância, e várias espécies são de importância veterinária por serem inimigos naturais de insetos-praga que se criam nesse tipo de substrato. Para se fazer um levantamento da abundância e diversidade dos Coleoptera associados a fezes bovinas no pasto, quatro massas fecais inteiras e 5 cm do solo imediatamente abaixo delas foram coletados semanalmente na maioria das vezes, de abril de 1992 a abril de 1994. As coletas foram feitas numa fazenda localizada nas proximidades da cidade de São Carlos, região central do estado de São Paulo. Os besouros foram extraídos das fezes com funis de Berlese, e também mantendo as fezes em recipientes cobertos com organza por 30 a 40 dias, coletando os besouros que emergissem. O total de 24.332 espécimes pertencentes a 13 famílias de besouros, e pelo menos 66 espécies foram identificadas. As famílias mais abundantes foram Aphodiidae, Staphylinidae and Scarabaeidae. Em geral, os besouros foram mais abundantes durante o período quente e úmido, de outubro a março, com algumas exceções. A importância dos besouros, tanto como inimigos naturais da mosca-dos-chifres como agentes da decomposição de massas fecais de bovinos é discutida.

Palavras-chave: Fezes bovinas, besouro coprófago, diversidade, controle biológico, Brasil


 

 

Cattle dung pats naturally dropped in pastures are normally colonized by a diversified arthropod community which has been studied in detail in several places (Merrit & Anderson 1977, Cervenka & Moon 1991), especially in countries where dung incorporation into the soil is problematic (Macqueen & Beirne 1975, Ridsdill-Smith 1981, Summerlin et al. 1990). The coprophagous fauna is composed mainly by Diptera and Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera), which are considered the most important agents promoting dung pat decay (Laurence 1955, Anderson et al. 1984, Cervenka & Moon 1991). Several studies have been done to determine the role of dung beetles in recycling the dung and to assess the possibility of using them as decomposing agents in the dung decaying process and in the control of dung breeding arthropod pests, mainly Diptera (Ridsdill-Smith 1981, Anderson et al. 1984, Roth et al. 1988). The introduction of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.) (Diptera: Muscidae) into Northern Brazil was reported in the early 80’s (Valério & Guimarães 1982). Its introduction and rapid dispersion to almost the entire country stimulated investigations on the arthropod community of undisturbed cattle dung in pastures in Brazil (Flechtmann et al. 1995a, Guimarães & Mendes 1998, Mendes & Linhares 2002). This paper presents data on diversity and abundance of cattle dung beetles collected during a two-year period in the vicinity of the city of São Carlos, State of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil.

 

Materials and Methods

The studies were done at Fazenda Canchim (21.30° S; 47° W), a farm belonging to Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA) in São Carlos, São Paulo State. The experimental sites were pastures of Brachiaria decumbens Saft. and Andropogon gayanus Kunth. From April 1993 to April 1994 ten undisturbed cattle dung pats naturally dropped and 5 cm of the soil immediately beneath them were collected almost all weekly, making a total of 83 samples (830 pats) collected in the two-year period.

The samples were placed in individual plastic containers and taken to the Laboratório de Entomologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, located approximately 150 km Southeast of São Carlos. A quarter of each of four dung pats, adding to the equivalent of one dung pat, and a 5 cm layer of its associated soil were transferred to Berlese funnels equipped with 40W light bulb where they were kept for five to seven days or until the funnel content was dry. The remaining three quarters of the four dung pats were kept individually in plastic containers covered with organza at room temperature. The other six pats were used to collect dung flies, and the results were presented elsewhere (Mendes & Linhares 2002). The containers were checked daily for insect emergence.

After 30 to 40 days the extraction of the remaining Coleoptera and other arthropods within the pats was done by dissolving the pats in water and collecting the floating arthropods. All collected arthropods were kept in 70% alcohol. Coleoptera were identified with the help of specialists and identification keys, and by comparison with material deposited at the Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP). The collected species or genera were classified into trophic groups as proposed by Valiela (1974) and Cervenka & Moon (1991). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to test for correlations of abundance among families, using the SAS® PROC CORR procedure (SAS, Inc 1987). Faunal indexes such as: Frequency, constancy, abundance and diversity of beetles collected during the drier and cooler, and warmer and humid periods were presented, as well (Silveira Neto et al. 1976).

 

Results and Discussion

The 24,332 collected Coleoptera belonged to 13 families and to at least to 66 species (Table 1). The most abundant and diverse families were Aphodiidae, Staphylinidae and Scarabaeidae. Nearly all Staphylinidae were identified at least to genus, and half of the species were separated into morphs. Differently from what happened during the warmer and humid period, all the non-identified species, although sparsely, were present during the cooler and drier year period. These data influenced the diversity index obtained for this period (Table 2).

 

 

 

 

Although the morphospecies comprised approximately half of the species, they represented only 3% of the collected specimens (Table 1). It is important to point out that almost all Aphodiidae and about 40% of the small Coleoptera were obtained from the four quarters of four dung pats (the equivalent of one dung pat) that were placed in the Berlese funnels. The Aphodiidae was the most abundant family representing 48.11% of the extracted Coleoptera (Table 1). The endocoprids Nialaphodius nigrita Fabricius and Labarrus lividus (Olivier) represented 88.28% of the family and 42.38% of all Coleoptera. Among the Scarabaeidae, Dichotomius bos (Blanchard) was the most frequent and constant species. This and other paracoprid species present natural nocturnal and twilight activity (Koller et al. 1999, 2002; Aidar et al. 2000). Because of this and due to the fact that dung pats were collected during the morning period, the paracoprids and telecoprids frequency and constancy may have been underestimated when compared to those of endocoprids that remain in the dung pat. Oliveira et al. (1996), who used Pitfall traps baited with dairy cattle dung near to stable in the same locality, presented data that support this assumption. Ontophagus buculus Mannerhein was the most frequent and constant species of the genus (Tables 1 and 2). Because it is absent or dispersed in other Brazilian localities, this beetle is not included among the important dung burying species (Flechtmann et al. 1995a, Marchiori et al. 2001). The Staphylinidae represented 30.4% of the Coleoptera and was the most diverse family in number of species (Table 1). Oxytelus spp. represented 59.95% of this family. The Histerids represented 3.9% of the Coleoptera, and Hister curvatus Erichson and Euspilotus spp. represented 99.3% of the 953 collected individuals (Table 1).

The meteorological data from the collecting period showed a drier and cooler period from April to September and a warmer and more humid period from October to March. In these periods the mean temperature varied respectively from 17ºC to 22ºC and from 22ºC to 26ºC. The monthly rainfall averages were 56 mm and 166 mm, varying from 0 to 120 mm and from 80 mm to 270 mm, respectively (details in Mendes & Linhares 2002).

In general, the Coleoptera were more frequent and abundant in the warmer period (Figs. 1a-f, Table 2). The exceptions were Cryptobium spp., N. nigrita, Phylonthus flavolimbatus Erichson and Cercyon spp that presented similar frequency and constancy in both year periods, and Dibelonetes hybridus Erichson that was more frequent and constant in the cooler period (Figs. 1a, c; Table 2). The species L. lividus, D. bos, Oxytelus sp.2 and H. curvatus were markedly more abundant in the warmer period (Figs. 1a, b, d, e; Table 2). The correlation analysis did not evidence a significant correlation among the Coleoptera families and between them and the Diptera families. However, significant positive correlations were verified between Scarabaeidae and Muscidae (+0.30; P < 0.006), Hydrophilidae and Scarabaeidae (+0.41; P < 0.0001), and Staphylinidae and Scarabaeidae (+30; P < 0.006).

 






 

Apparently, N. nigrita, L. lividus and Ataenius spp. were the main dung tunneling and airing beetles during both years (Table 2). This could facilitate the dung colonization by predators and parasites of Diptera (Bornemissza 1976). Direct observations at the pastures indicate that Dychotomius spp., especially D. bos, were efficient dung burying agents during the warmer and humid season. Indirect evidence of Dychotomius presence beneath the dung was registered by the findings of dung partially covered by the soil extracted by Dychotomius while tunneling (Alves & Nakano 1977). It is also important to point out that other paracoprids such as Digithontophagus gazella (F.) and Onthophagus spp. have been pointed as more prolific and productive as dung burying beetles than Dychotomius spp. (Hunter et al. 1991, Walsh et al. 1997, Miranda et al. 1998).

The majority of the collected Staphylinidae belong to Oxytelus spp. Species of Oxytelus are considered coprophagous (Hanski 1987). Therefore, more than half of the collected individuals belonging to this group should not be considered efficient controllers of pest Diptera. Nevertheless, Chryptobium spp., Heterothops spp., and Phylonthus spp. are predators of Diptera eggs and larvae, while Aleochara spp. are parasites as immatures and predators as adults (Harris & Blume 1986, Hanski 1987). Some species of Phylonthus, including P. flavolimbatus, are efficient predators of Haematobia irritans (L.) (Harris & Oliver 1979, Hunter et al. 1989). Among the Histeridae, species of Hister and Euspilotus are also cited as predators of immature Diptera, including H. irritans, in Australia and North America (Summerlin et al. 1982, Harris & Blume 1986).

The absence of correlation between some groups and the positive correlation detected between some Diptera and other groups indicate that there is enough food for the flies and their competitors, and that the predation suffered by them would not significantly interfere with their emergence. The construction of tunnels by the tunneling Coleoptera would facilitate the locomotion of the fly larvae in the dung pats. In addition, it should be taken into consideration that the dung pats were kept in the laboratory after their collection at the pastures and, a considerable number of Coleoptera was taken daily from the dung. Therefore, it would be necessary to make a more controlled and/or specific experiment to check for interactions between the insect guilds in dung pats in the pastures. Finally, the results show a diverse and abundant Coleoptera community in cattle dung pats at pastures, and several collected species are important dung burying agents and can be considered as potential horn fly natural enemies.

 

Acknowledgements

Carlos Campaner, Museu de Zoologia of the Universidade de São Paulo (MZSP), and Fernando Z. Vaz-de-Melo, Faculdade de Agronomia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, State of Minas Gerais, helped with identification of the Coleoptera.

 

References

Aidar, T., Koller, W.W., S.R. Rodrigues, A.M. Corrêa, J.C.C. da Silva, O.S. Balta, J.M. Oliveira & V.L. Oliveira. 2000. Besouros coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). coletados em Aquidauana, MS, Brasil. An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 29: 817-820.         [ Links ]

Alves, S.B. & O. Nakano. 1977. Influência do Dychotomius anaglypticus (Mannerheim, 1829) (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae), no crescimento de plantas de Napier. Ecossistema 2: 31-33.         [ Links ]

Anderson, J.R., R.W. Merrit & E.C. Loomis 1984. The insect-free cattle dung fouling of rangeland pastures. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 133-141.        [ Links ]

Bornemissza, G.F. 1976. The Australian dung beetle project 1965 -1975. Australian Meat Res. Comm. Rev. 30: 32pp.         [ Links ]

Cervenka, V.J. & R.D. Moon. 1991. Arthropods associated with cattle dung pats in Minnesota. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 64: 131-143.         [ Links ]

Flechtmann, C.A.H., S.R. Rodrigues & M.C.Z. Seno. 1995. Controle biológico da mosca-dos-chifres em Selvíria, Mato Grosso do Sul. 3. Levantamento de espécies fimícolas associadas à mosca. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 39: 249-258.         [ Links ]

Guimarães, J.A. & J. Mendes. 1998. Succession and abundance of Staphilinidae in cattle dung in Uberlândia, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 93: 127-131.         [ Links ]

Hanski, I. 1987. Nutritional ecology of dung-and carrion-feeding insects, p.834-887. In F.J.R. Slaniki & J.G. Rodrigues (eds.), Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates. John Wiley & Sons, Ins. New York, 1016p.         [ Links ]

Harris, R.L. & L.M. Oliver. 1979. Predation of Philonthus flavolimbatus on the horn fly. Environ. Entomol. 8: 259-260.         [ Links ]

Harris R.L. & R.R. Blume. 1986. Beneficial arthropods inhabiting bovine droppings in the United States, p.10-15. In R.S. Patterson & D.A. Rutz (eds.), Biological control of muscoid flies. Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62, 174p.         [ Links ]

Hunter, J.S., D.E. Bay & G.T. Fincher. 1989. Laboratory and field observations on the life history and habits of Philonthus cruentatus and Philonthus flavolimbatus. Southwest. Entomol. 14: 41-47.         [ Links ]

Hunter, J.S., G.T. Fincher & J.L. Lancaster Jr. 1991. Observations on the life history of Onthophagus medorensis. Southwest. Entomol. 16: 205-213.         [ Links ]

Koller, W.W., A. Gomes, S.R. Rodrigues, A.C.L. Rodrigues & J. Mendes. 2002. Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) associated to cattle dung in Campo Grande, MS, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 31: 641-645.        [ Links ]

Koller, W.W., A. Gomes, S.R. Rodrigues & R.G.O. Alves. 1999. Besouros coprófagos (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) coletados em Campo Grande, MS, Brasil. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 28: 403-412.        [ Links ]

Laurence, B.R. 1955. The larval inhabitants of cow pats. J. Anim. Ecol. 23: 234-260.        [ Links ]

Macqueen, A. & B.P. Beirne. 1975. Influence of other insects on production of horn fly, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), from cattle dung in South-Central British Columbia. Can. Entomol. 107: 1255-1264.        [ Links ]

Marchiori, C.H., A.T. Oliveira & A.X. Linhares. 2001. Artrópodes associados a massas fecais bovinas no sul do estado de Goiás. Neotrop. Entomol. 30: 19-24.         [ Links ]

Mendes, J. & A.X. Linhares 2002. Cattle dung breeding Diptera in pastures in Southeastern Brazil: Diversity, abundance and seasonality. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 97: 37-41.        [ Links ]

Merrit, R.W. & J.R. Anderson. 1977. The effects of different pasture and rangeland ecosystems on the annual dynamics of insects in cattle droppings. Hilgardia 45: 31-71.        [ Links ]

Miranda, C.H.B, J.C.C. Santos & I. Bianchin. 1998. Contribuição de Onthophagus gazella à melhoria da fertilidade do solo pelo enterrio de massa fecal bovina fresca. 1. Estudo em casa de vegetação. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 27: 681-685.         [ Links ]

Oliveira, G.P., A.L. Silva, J. Mendes & L.N.J. Tavares. 1996. Insetos associados a fezes de bovinos na região de São Carlos, São Paulo, Cienc. Agrotecnol. 27: 39-47.        [ Links ]

Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. 1981. Some effects of three species of dung beetle (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in South-Western Australia on the survival of the bush Fly, Musca autumnalis Walker (Diptera: Muscidae) in dung pads. Bull. Entomol. Res. 71: 425-433.        [ Links ]

Roth, J.P., A. Macqueen & D.E. Bay. 1988. Scarab activity and predation as mortality factors of the buffalo fly Haematobia irritans exigua, in Central Queensland. Southwest. Entomol. 13: 119-125.         [ Links ]

SAS, Institute Inc. 1987. SAS User’s guide: Statistics 6th ed. Cary, North Carolina.         [ Links ]

Summerlin, J., D.E. Bay & R.L. Harris. 1982. Seasonal distribution and abundance of Histeridae collected from cattle droppings in South Central Texas. Southwest. Entomol. 7: 82-86.         [ Links ]

Silveira Neto, S., O. Nakano, D. Barbin & N.A.V. Nova. 1976. Manual de ecologia dos insetos. São Paulo, Ed. Agronômica CERES, 419p.        [ Links ]

Summerlin, J.W., G.T. Fincher & J.P. Roth. 1990. Predation by Atholus rothkirchi on the horn fly. Southwest. Entomol. 15: 253-256.         [ Links ]

Valério, J.R. & J.H. Guimarães. 1983. Sobre a ocorrência de uma nova praga, Haematobia irritans (L) (Diptera: Muscidae) no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zool. 1: 417-418.         [ Links ]

Valiela, I. 1974. Composition food webs and population limitation on dung arthropod communities during invasion and succession. Amer. Midl. Nat. 92: 370-385.         [ Links ]

Walsh, G.C., H.A. Cordo, J.A. Briano, D.E. Gandolfo & G.A. Loarzo 1997. Laboratory Culture of Beneficial Dung Scarabs. J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 124-129.        [ Links ]

 

 

Received 02/XII/04.
Accepted 25/V/06.