Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Spread of phosphine resistance among brazilian populations of three species of stored product insects

Abstract

The resistance to fumigant insecticides in stored-products insects is often recorded. Several factors influence the evolution of insecticide resistance. Among these, the frequency of applications and the migration of resistant populations are of primary importance for the stored-product insects. The aim of this study was to characterize the spectrum and investigate the status of phosphine resistance in Brazil, in 13 populations of the Coleoptera Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Tenebrionidae), ten populations of Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabr.) (Bostrichidae), and eight populations of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Silvanidae). The pattern of resistance dispersion in the populations of these species was also verified. The bioassays for the detection of phosphine resistance followed the FAO standard method. To test the influence of migration in the evolution of the phosphine resistance, the difference of mortality in the discriminating concentration and the geographical distance among each pair wise combination of collection sites were correlated. None of the populations exhibited mortality above 90% in the discriminating concentration, for the three species. Mortality in the discriminating concentration increased with the geographical distance for R.dominica and O.surinamensis. However, no significant linear response was observed among the variables for T.castaneum populations. These results suggest that the dispersion of insects and the local selection are relevant in the evolution of the phosphine resistance in populations of R.dominica and O.surinamensis. In contrast, grain trade and local selection are probably the factors that determine the evolution of the phosphine resistance in populations of T. castaneum.

Tribolium castaneum; Rhyzopertha dominica; Oryzaephilus surinamensis; insecticide resistance; migration; stored grain


PEST MANAGEMENT

Spread of phosphine resistance among brazilian populations of three species of stored product insects

Marco A G PimentelI; Lêda R D'A FaroniII; Felipe H da SilvaII; Maurílio D BatistaII; Raul N C GuedesI

IDepto de Biologia Animal, Setor de Entomologia; Univ Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG; Brasil marco@insecta.ufv.br, guedes@ufv.br

IIDepto de Engenharia Agrícola, Setor de Armazenamento. Univ Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG; Brasil lfaroni@ufv.br, felipehumberto@gmail.com, mauriliodbatista@yahoo.com.br

ABSTRACT

The resistance to fumigant insecticides in stored-products insects is often recorded. Several factors influence the evolution of insecticide resistance. Among these, the frequency of applications and the migration of resistant populations are of primary importance for the stored-product insects. The aim of this study was to characterize the spectrum and investigate the status of phosphine resistance in Brazil, in 13 populations of the Coleoptera Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Tenebrionidae), ten populations of Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabr.) (Bostrichidae), and eight populations of Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Silvanidae). The pattern of resistance dispersion in the populations of these species was also verified. The bioassays for the detection of phosphine resistance followed the FAO standard method. To test the influence of migration in the evolution of the phosphine resistance, the difference of mortality in the discriminating concentration and the geographical distance among each pair wise combination of collection sites were correlated. None of the populations exhibited mortality above 90% in the discriminating concentration, for the three species. Mortality in the discriminating concentration increased with the geographical distance for R.dominica and O.surinamensis. However, no significant linear response was observed among the variables for T.castaneum populations. These results suggest that the dispersion of insects and the local selection are relevant in the evolution of the phosphine resistance in populations of R.dominica and O.surinamensis. In contrast, grain trade and local selection are probably the factors that determine the evolution of the phosphine resistance in populations of T. castaneum.

Key words:Tribolium castaneum, Rhyzopertha dominica, Oryzaephilus surinamensis, insecticide resistance, migration, stored grain

Insects are a serious problem in storage products, particularly in the tropics. The relative importance of the different insect pest species of stored products varies among areas and depends on the stored product (Champ & Dyte 1976). In Brazil, some species prevail due to their high reproduction capacity, broad distribution and high level of acquired resistance to the fumigants and contact insecticides (Pacheco et al 1990, Sartori et al 1990, Guedes et al 1995, 1996, Lorini & Galley 1999).

The red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabr.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), and the sawthoothed grain beetle, Oryzaephilus surinamensis (L.) (Coleoptera: Silvanidae), are the main cosmopolitan pests of stored cereals in the tropics, together with the cereal weevils Sitophilus spp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The main method for controlling stored-product insects in warm climates is the use of insecticides due to the lack of other control alternatives (Guedes 1991). However, insecticide resistance is evident in many field populations of insects that infest stored products, where these compounds are extensively used (Champ & Dyte 1976, Badmin 1990, Pacheco et al 1990, Guedes et al 1995, 1996, 1997bc, 1998, Subramanyam & Hagstrum 1996).

Phosphine has been widely used as fumigant for the control of stored-product insects for almost half century (Price & Mills 1988, Chaudhry 2000). It is by far the most widely used fumigant because of its low cost, fast diffusion in the air, and absence of detectable residue levels (Chaudhry 2000). These advantages contributed to an increased dependence on phosphine as fumigant (Chaudhry 2000). However, the long-term use of a single fumigant increases the risk of phosphine resistance development in pest populations (Benhalima et al 2004).

Resistance to fumigants is an increasing problem in controlling stored-product insects throughout the world (Champ & Dyte 1976, Price & Mills 1988). The importance of phosphine to protect stored grain products has recently increased even further due to international agreements to phase out the use of the fumigant methyl bromide (UNEP 1995). In addition, the lack of airtight conditions for fumigation in most storage units increases the frequency of control failures and consequently increases the frequency of applications (Tyler et al 1983, Pacheco et al 1990, Chaudhry 2000, Benhalima et al 2004). This results in an increased selection pressure for phosphine resistance (Chaudhry 1997, 2000).

A global survey undertaken by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in 1972/1973 showed that about 10 % of the collected populations contained phosphine resistant individuals, but phosphine resistance was not found in Brazil at that time (Champ & Dyte 1976). Since this survey, many control failures with phosphine have been reported in Brazil, allegedly due to resistance (Pacheco et al 1990, Sartori et al 1990). Moreover, phosphine resistance in stored-product insects is documented in several neighboring South American countries (Champ & Dyte 1976, Pacheco et al 1990, Sartori et al 1990). Except for the global survey undertaken by FAO (Champ & Dyte 1976), surveys for phosphine resistance of stored-products insects in Brazil are rare. There are only five reports showing phosphine resistance in Brazilian populations of R.dominica, T.castaneum, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), Sitophilus zeamais Mots. and Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Pacheco et al 1990, Sartori et al 1990, Lorini et al 2007, Pimentel et al 2007, 2009).

Several factors influence the evolution of the resistance to insecticides (Georghiou 1972, Roush & Daly 1990, Mallet 1993, Hoy et al 1998). Among these, the frequency of insecticide applications and migration of resistant populations are of primary importance for the stored-product insects. Studies on migration of resistant populations of stored-products insects are scarce, except for an earlier initial study with populations of R.dominica and a subsequent study with organophosphate and pyrethroid resistant strains of S.zeamais where the lack of correlation between geographic distance and the resistance status suggests that local selection and/or broad dispersal of resistant populations by grain trade are major factors in the evolution of insecticide resistance in populations of this species, a contrast with the findings reported for the coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Menéville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) (Guedes et al 1997a, Fragoso et al 2003ab).

The understanding of the dispersion patterns of phosphine resistant populations of stored-product insects is fundamental to phosphine resistance management. Therefore, the aim of our study was (i) to characterize the spectrum of resistance and investigate the status of phosphine resistance in Brazilian populations of T.castaneum, R.dominica, and O.surinamensis; and (ii) to verify the pattern of resistance dispersion in the populations of these species.

Material and Methods

Insects. Thirteen populations of T.castaneum, ten of R.dominica and eight of O.surinamensis collected at sixteen sites in four Brazilian states were used in this study (Fig 1, Table 1). Nine of them were field-collected between March and August 2004 and eight of them were collected between March and September 2005 and at least 400 individuals were used to establish each population in the laboratory. These populations were reared in glass jars (1.5 1) and maintained under controlled conditions of 28 ± 2ºC and RH: 70 ±5%. Broken corn grains were used as food source forT. castaneum and O. surinamensis and whole wheat grains were used for R. dominica (13% moisture content). Grains were previously disinfected and kept at -18ºC to avoid field cross-infestation.


Bioassays of phosphine resistance. Discriminating concentrations recommended by FAO (FAO 1975) were used for detecting phosphine resistance in adult insects (0.03 mg l-1 for R.dominica, 0.04 mg l-1 for T. castaneum and 0.05 mg l-1 for O.surinamensis). Fumigation of adults was based on the FAO method (FAO 1975) and took place at 25ºC and RH: 70%. The concentration of the phosphine source was always checked before the bioassays.

Phosphine (ca. 86% pure) was produced using aluminum phosphide tablets (0.6 g) in acidified water (sulfuric acid 5%). Adult beetles (2-4 weeks old) were confined in ventilated plastic containers inside gas-tight desiccators. Fifty unsexed adults were placed in each container and two containers were placed in each desiccator. Phosphine was injected with gas-tight syringes through a septum in the lid of each desiccator to produce the required concentration. After fumigation (20h period of exposure), the containers were removed from the desiccators and kept for 14 days (25°C and RH: 70%), after which mortality was assessed. Natural mortality was corrected following Abbott (1925).

Resistance dispersal. The influence of the migration in the evolution of the phosphine resistance in the stored-product insects was tested correlating phosphine resistance and distance between sampling sites. The geographical coordinates of the population sampling sites were used to calculate the geographical distances between any two sites obtained by global positioning satellite (Garmin GPS 12XL; Olathe, KS, USA). The pair wise differences of mortality at discriminating concentration of phosphine were correlated with the respective geographical distance among the sites of collection of the populations.

Statistical analysis. The corrected mortality (%) was subjected to analysis of variance followed by Tukey's HSD test (P < 0.05, PROC GLM, SAS Institute 1989). The relationships between corrected mortality at discriminating concentration (%) and the respective geographical distance (km) among the places of origin of the populations were subjected to regression analysis for the three insect species (PROC GLM, SAS Institute 1989).

Results

Phosphine resistance. The mortality at discriminating concentration varied significantly among populations of T.castaneum (F12,43= 133.99, P < 0.0001), R.dominica (F9,31= 21.31, P <0.0001) and O.surinamensis (F7,22 = 94.92, P < 0.0001) (Table 2). None of the populations surveyed showed mortality superior to 90%, for all of the three species. The number of insects that survived the discriminating concentration of phosphine further indicated that some of the population samples tested had a high frequency of resistant individuals. For example, the T. castaneum populations of Uberlândia, Rio Verde and Bom Despacho showed 100% of survival at the discriminating concentration of phosphine. For R.dominica, the populations of Uberlândia, Bom Despacho and Palmital showed 100% of survival and for O.surinamensis the populations of Guaxupé and Astolfo Dutra present also 100% of survival at the discriminating concentration of phosphine (Table 2).

Resistance dispersal. There was no significant (F1,131 = 0.11; P < 0.7373) linear response between resistance and dispersal for the populations of T.castaneum, however the correlation between these variables was significant for the populations of R. dominica (F1,89 = 22.00; P < 0.0001) and O. surinamensis (F1,41 = 13.29; P< 0.0008) (Fig 2). The mortality variation at the discriminating concentrations increased with the geographical distances for R. dominica and O. surinamensis. This finding suggests that the dispersion of insects is relevant in the evolution of resistance to phosphine, particularly for R.dominica and O.surinamensis. However, especially for stored-products insects, grain trade within the country, together with local selection, are probably the main factors determining the spread and evolution of phosphine resistance in Brazil, due to high turnover of grain from producing and consuming regions.


Discussion

The presence of unaffected insects at the end of the test in some populations should be regarded as evidence of resistance, requiring further investigation. However, the evidence of the occurrence of phosphine resistance, with different frequencies, in all populations of T.castaneum, R.dominica and O.surinamensis from the states of Goiás, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, and São Paulo are shown in the results of the present study (Table 2). This is the first report of phosphine resistance in stored product pests from Mato Grosso and Minas Gerais. Hence, phosphine resistance is widely spread in stored product insect-pests in Brazil.

Some populations of T.castaneum (Uberlândia-MG, Bom Despacho-MG, and Rio Verde-GO), R.dominica (Palmital-SP, Bom Despacho-MG, and Uberlândia-MG), and O.surinamensis (Astolfo Dutra-MG and Guaxupé-MG) showed 100% of survival at the FAO discriminating concentration (Table 2). These results were expected because more recent studies with Brazilian strains of R.dominica also found unaffected insects after bioassays with FAO discriminating concentration. For instance, Lorini et al (2007) in a study with 19 strains of R.dominica from Brazil found survivors at discriminating concentration. Of the 19 samples tested, five could be diagnosed with weak resistance and 14 with strong resistance suggesting that resistance was widespread and apparently at a high level. Therefore, our results are in accordance with earlier surveys of phosphine resistance in Brazil (Lorini et al 2007, Pimentel et al 2007, 2009) and also show evidence of resistance, but requiring further investigation for these species studied here.

This low mortality at the discriminating concentration may suggest that these populations have been under high selection pressure for many years (Benhalima et al 2004, Collins et al 2005). In addition, the frequent unsuitable storage management added to poor fumigant application techniques has probably enhanced the selection pressure for resistance (Sartori et al 1990, Lorini et al 2007, Pimentel et al 2007). Another factor that can influence the evolution of phosphine resistance is the movement of insects due to the commodity trade (Benhalima et al 2004, Fragoso et al 2003b).

Many species of stored-product insects are capable of long-distance flight, of breeding on many different wild hosts, and feeding on flowers and grass to increase adult longevity and fecundity (Hagstrum et al 1996, Jia et al 2008). Besides this, the several species of stored-product insects are known to infest crops in the field prior the harvest (Hagstrum 1985) and can be found within woodlands far from grain storage sites (Campbell et al 2006). Other studies reporting the distribution of insects inside structures (Campbell et al 2002), around outside of structures (Campbell & Mullen 2004) and sometimes far away from these structures (Sinclair & Haddrell 1985) suggest the capability for long distance flight, which is also confirmed by some laboratory experiments (Perez-Mendoza et al 1999a, b).

Our results with populations of R.dominica and O.surinamensis, but not T.castaneum, provide support for this assumption. The lack of spatial pattern was evidenced by the lack of correlation between geographical distance and mortality at discriminating concentration spectrum for each population of T.castaneum, as also reported for S.zeamais and contrary to what was observed for at least one tropical pest species, the coffee leaf miner (Fragoso et al 2003ab). Our results for T.castaneum suggest that local selection and/or broad dispersal of resistant populations by grain trade are probably the major forces driving the evolution and spread of phosphine resistance, as also suggested for S.zeamais (Fragoso et al 2003b). In contrast, the results found for R.dominica and O.surinamensis indicate that the capacity of dispersion of these insects can affect the dispersion of resistant genotypes, besides the local selection.

This assumption provides support for the hypothesis that the dispersion of insects of one place to another is relevant in the phosphine resistance evolution. The selection exercised by insecticides and the capacity of dispersion of a species are important information for the adoption of resistance management strategies (Georghiou 1972, Scott et al 2000). Besides the dispersion of the insects it is obvious that, particularly for stored-product insects, grain trade within the country is an important factor driving the spread of phosphine resistance. Regarding a more applied perspective, such studies will provide support for establishing the geographical scale of management required and the selection of suitable insecticides for use in rotation or in combination in insecticide resistance management programs.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank A F Rozado, V Arthur, C L Cardoso and D P Cardoso for providing T.castaneum, R.dominica, and O.surinamensis populations used in this study; and the Companhia de Armazéns e Silos do Estado de Minas Gerais (CASEMG), Cooperativa Agroindustrial dos Produtores Rurais do Sudoeste Goiano (COMIGO), and Companhia de Entrepostos e Armazéns Gerais de São Paulo (CEAGESP) for allowing insect sampling in their storage facilities. Financial support by the National Council of Scientific and Technological Development-CNPq (M.A.G.P.-140210/2006-7, L.R.D'A.F. and R.N.C.G.) and the Minas Gerais State Agency for Research Aid-FAPEMIG were also greatly appreciated.

Received 26/IX/08

Accepted 04/I/10

Edited by André L Lourenção - IAC

  • Abbott W S (1925) A method of computing the effctiveness of an insecticide J Econ Entomol 18: 265-267.
  • Badmin J S (1990) IRAC survey of resistance of stored grain pests: results and progress. In Fleurrat-Lessard F, Ducom P (eds) 5th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Bordeaux. Proceedings... Bordeaux, INRA/SDPV, p.973-981.
  • Benhalima H, Chaudhry M Q, Mills K A, Price N R (2004) Phosphine resistance in stored-product insects collected from various grain storage facilities in Morocco. J Stored Prod Res 40: 241-249.
  • Campbell J F, Ching'oma G P, Toews M D, Ramaswamy S B (2006) Spatial distribution and movement patterns of stored-product insects. In Lorini I, Bacaltchuk B, Beckel H, Deckers D, Sundfeld E, Santos J P dos, Biagi J D, Celaro J C, Faroni L R D'A, Bortolini L de O F, Sartori M R, Elias M C, Guedes R N C, Fonseca R G da, Scussel V M (eds) 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Campinas, São Paulo. Proceedings... Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Pós-Colheita/ABRAPOS, Brazil, p.361-370.
  • Campbell J F, Mullen M A (2004) Distribution and dispersal behaviour of Trogoderma variable Ballion and Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) outside a food processing plant. J Econ Entomol 97: 1455-1464.
  • Campbell J F, Mullen M A, Dowdy A K (2002) Monitoring stored-product pests in food processing plants: a case study using pheromone trapping, contour mapping, and mark-recapture. J Econ Entomol 95: 1089-1101.
  • Champ B R, Dyte C E (1976) Informe de la prospeccion mundial de la FAO sobre susceptibilidad a los insecticidas de las plagas de granos almacenados. Roma, FAO, 356p.
  • Chaudhry M Q (1997) A review of the mechanisms involved in the action of phosphine as an insecticide and phosphine resistance in stored-product insects. Pestic Sci 49: 213-228.
  • Chaudhry M Q (2000) Phosphine resistance. Pestic Outlook June 2000: 88-91.
  • Collins P J, Daglish G J, Pavic H, Kopittke R A (2005) Response of mixed-age cultures of phosphine-resistant and susceptible strains of lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica, to phosphine at a range of concentrations and exposure periods. J Stored Prod Res 41: 373-385.
  • FAO (1975) Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. 16: Tentative method for adults of some stored cereals, with methyl bromide and phosphine. FAO Plant Prot. Bull 23: 12-25.
  • Fragoso D B, Guedes R N C, Ladeira J A (2003a) Seleção na evolução de resistência a organofosforados em Leucoptera coffeella (Guérin-Mèneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae). Neotrop Entomol 32: 329-334.
  • Fragoso D B, Guedes R N C, Rezende S T (2003b) Glutathione S-transferase detoxification as a potential pyrethroid resistance mechanism in the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais Entomol Exp Appl 109: 21-29.
  • Georghiou G P (1972) The evolution of resistance to pesticides. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3: 133-168.
  • Guedes R N C (1991) Manejo integrado para a proteção de grãos armazenados contra insetos. Rev Bras Armazen 15: 3-48.
  • Guedes R N C, Dover B A, Kambhampati S (1996) Resistance to chlorpyrifos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl, and malathion in Brazilian and US populations of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). J Econ Entomol 89: 27-32.
  • Guedes R N C, Lima J O L, Santos J P, Cruz C D (1995) Resistance to DDT and pyrehroids in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 31: 145-150.
  • Guedes R N C, Kambhampati S, Dover B A (1997a) Allozyme variation among Brazilian and U.S. populations of Rhyzopertha dominica resistant to insecticides. Entomol Exp Appl 84: 49-57.
  • Guedes R N C, Kambhampati S, Dover B A, Zhu K Y (1997b) Biochemical mechanisms of organophosphate resistance in Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) populations from the United States and Brazil. Bull Entomol Res 87: 581-586.
  • Guedes R N C, Zhu K Y, Kambhampati S (1998) Altered acetycholinesterase associated with organophosphate resistance in Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Col.: Bostrichidae) populations from Brazil and the United States. J Appl Entomol 122: 269-173.
  • Guedes R N C, Zhu K Y, Kambhampati S, Dover B A (1997c) An altered acetylcholinesterase conferring negative cross-insensitivity to different insecticidal inhibitors in organosphophate-resistant lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica Pestic Biochem Physiol 58: 55-62;
  • Hagstrum D W (1985) Preharvest infestation of cowpeas by the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and population trends during storage in Florida. J Econ Entomol 82: 655-659.
  • Hagstrum D W, Flinn P W, Howard R W (1996) Ecology, p.71-134. In Subramanyam B, Hagstrum D W (eds) Integrated management of insects in stored products. New York, Marcel Dekker, 426p.
  • Hoy C W, Head G P, Hall F R (1998) Spatial heterogeneity and insect adaptation to toxins. Annu Rev Entomol 43: 571-594.
  • Jia F, Toews M D, Campbell J F, Ramaswamy S B (2008) Survival and reproduction of lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on flora associated with native habitats in Kansas. J Stored Prod Res 44: 366-372.
  • Lorini I, Collins P J, Daglish G J, Nayak M K, Pavic H (2007) Detection and characterisation of strong resistance to phosphine in Brazilian Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae). Pest Manag Sci 63: 358-364.
  • Lorini I, Galley D J (1999) Deltamethrin resistance in Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), a pest of stored grain in Brazil. J Stored Prod Res 35: 37-45.
  • Mallet J (1993) The evolution of insecticide resistance: Have the insects won? Trends Ecol Evol 4: 336-340.
  • Pacheco I A, Sartori M R, Taylor R W D (1990) Levantamento de resistência de insetos-praga de grãos armazenados à fosfina, no estado de São Paulo. Coletânea do ITAL 20: 144-154.
  • Perez-Mendoza J, Dover B A, Hagstrum D W, Hopkins T L (1999a) Effect of crowding, food deprivation, and diet on flight initiation na dlipid reserves of the lesser grain borer, Rhyzopertha dominica Entomol Exp Appl 91: 317-326.
  • Perez-Mendoza J, Hagstrum D W, Dover B A, Hopkins T L, Baker J E (1999b) Flight response, body weight, and lipid content of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) as influenced by strain, season and phenotype. J Stored Prod Res 35: 183-196.
  • Pimentel M A G, Faroni L R D'A, Guedes R N C, Sousa A H, Tótola M R (2009) Phosphine resistance in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 45: 71-74.
  • Pimentel M A G, Faroni L R D'A, Tótola M R, Guedes R N C (2007) Phosphine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored-product insects. Pest Manag Sci 63: 876-881.
  • Price L A, Mills K A (1988) The toxicity of phosphine to the immature stages of resistant and susceptible strains of some common stored product beetles, and implications for their control. J Stored Prod Res 24: 51-59.
  • Roush R T, Daly J C (1990) The role of population genetics in resistance research and management, p.97-152. In Roush R T, Tabashnik B E (eds) Pesticide resistance in arthropods. New York, Chapman & Hall, 303p.
  • Sartori M R, Pacheco I A, Vilar R M (1990) Resistance to phosphine in stored grain insects in Brazil. In Fleurrat-Lessard F, Ducom P (eds) 5th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Bordeaux. Proceedings... Bordeaux: INRA/SDPV, p.1041-1050.
  • SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User's guide for personal computers, version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, USA.
  • Scott J G, Alefantis T G, Kaufman P E, Rutz D A(2000) Insecticide resistance in house flies from caged layer poultry facilities. Pest Manag Sci 56: 147-153.
  • Sinclair E R, Haddrell R L (1985) Flight of stored products beetles over a grain farming area in southern Queensland. J Aust Entomol Soc 24: 9-15.
  • Subramanyam B, Hagstrum D W (1996) Resistance measurement and management, p.331-397. In B Subramanyam, D W Hagstrum (eds) Integrated management of insects in stored products. New York, Marcel Dekker, 426p.
  • Tyler R S, Taylor R W, Rees D P (1983) Insect resistance to phosphine fumigation in food warehouses in Bangladesh. Int Pest Control January/February: 10-21.
  • UNEP (1995) Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. 1994 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee. 1995 Assessment. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 304p.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    12 Mar 2010
  • Date of issue
    Feb 2010

History

  • Received
    26 Sept 2008
  • Accepted
    04 Jan 2010
Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, R. Harry Prochet, 55, 86047-040 Londrina PR Brasil, Tel.: (55 43) 3342 3987 - Londrina - PR - Brazil
E-mail: editor@seb.org.br