SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 issue5Comparative reproductive biology of the social parasite Acromyrmex ameliae de Souza, Soares & Della Lucia and of its host Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)Species of Baetidae (Ephemeroptera) from Southern Bahia State, Brazil, with description of a new species of Paracloeodes day author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Neotropical Entomology

Print version ISSN 1519-566X

Neotrop. entomol. vol.39 no.5 Londrina Sept./Oct. 2010

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2010000500008 

SYSTEMATICS, MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY

 

A metallic impregnation technique adapted to study the honeybee Apis mellifera L. brain

 

 

Luciana K CalábriaI; Renata R TeixeiraI; Viviane R A MoraesI; Ana Alice D SantosII; Foued S EspindolaI

ILab de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Genética e Bioquímica, Univ Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2E sala 39A, Bairro Umuarama, 38400-902 Uberlândia, MG, Brasil
IISetor de Citologia, Histologia e Embriologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Univ Federal de Uberlândia, Campus Umuarama, Bloco 2B, Bairro Umuarama, 38400-902 Uberlândia, MG, Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

In order to visualize the distribution pattern of the neuronal bodies and neurofibrils in the honeybee brain, we adapted a metallic impregnation technique first described for vertebrate nervous system by Ramón y Cajal. The honeybee brain constitution plays a key role in the development of learning and memory capacities. The general characteristics observed in the honeybee brain, stained by metallic impregnation, revealed its anatomical and morphological constitution in agreement with studies of other insect brains using different techniques. Metallic impregnation evidenced the optic lobe neuropils, the ocelli fiber cells, the neuron extensions of the calyces, and the axon bundles that involve the antennal glomeruli, as well as the neuron extensions in the alpha lobe. We also observed that the antennal glomeruli were mainly formed by fibers. The optical lobes were impregnated distinctly in the monopolar neuron bodies and in the fibers. In the mushroom bodies, we observed the lip, collar and calyx basal areas. Based on our results, the metallic impregnation technique is effective to visualize neuronal bodies and neurofibrils; moreover, is simpler and faster than other techniques, offering new insights for the investigation of the invertebrate nervous system.

Key words: Neurofibril, neuron, invertebrate, silver


 

 

Despite its simplicity, the Apis mellifera L. nervous system grants honeybees with memory and learning capacity, as well as a complex biological behaviour. This simple system is formed by a brain, whose volume does not exceed 1 mm3, and a ventral nervous cord, whose length extends from the head to the end of the abdomen (Menzel & Giurfa 2001). Equipped with such a nervous system, the honeybees play a key role in ecology, as many plants and animal species depend directly or indirectly on its existence. Not surprisingly, the recent completion of its genome aroused the interest of many laboratories towards these social insects as behavioral, genetic and neurological models (Oleskevich et al 1997, Robinson et al 1997, Giurfa 2003, The honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium 2006).

The honeybee brain consists on a protocerebrum, comprised by the optical lobes and the mushroom bodies, a deutocerebrum, comprised by the antennal lobes, and a tritocerebrum, which is atrophied in adults (Snodgrass 1956). The optical lobe is a mass of nervous fibers and cells that form three internal synaptic ganglia: lamina, medulla and lobula. The lamina receives axonal projections of retinal photoreceptors arranged in ocular units called ommatidia (Nässel et al 1986). The mushroom bodies are composed of four calyces with peduncles connected to the alpha lobe (Oleskevich et al 1997). The calyces contain intrinsic neurons, the Kenyon cells that can be subdivided into three types: internal, external, and non-compacted Kenyon cells (Rybak & Menzel 1993, Farris et al 1999). Regarding spatial learning, these structures are equivalent to vertebrate hippocampus (Capaldi et al 1999). The alpha lobe processes the information that comes from other regions, being connected with the mushroom bodies, optical lobe, and antennal lobe (Mobbs 1982). The antennal lobe consists on receptor neurons for olfactory stimuli perceived by the antennae. It is formed by hundreds of glomeruli surrounded by cellular bodies (Kloppenburg 1995). This structure corresponds to the olfactory bulb of the vertebrates (Lancet 1986).

In the present study, we analyzed the morphology of the honeybee A. mellifera brain through metallic impregnation, a method that was first described by Ramón & Cajal for vertebrate nervous tissue, and now modified for invertebrate tissue. By adapting the protocol described by Behmer et al (1986), we investigated the neuron bodies, neurofibrils and endoneurons of Apis mellifera brain via black, brown, and yellow staining, respectively.

 

Material and Methods

Adult worker honeybees A. mellifera were captured in the Experimental Garden of the Biology Institute, at Federal University of Uberlandia, Brazil. Brains were dissected with the help of clips and ophthalmological scissors.

In order to analyze the neuropils and their pericellular arborization, the brains were processed according to Ramón y Cajal's technique, as described in Behmer et al (1986), and adapted to the honeybee nervous system. The brains were dissected in 0.2 M phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (NaCl 18 g/l, NaH2PO4H2O 27.6 g/l and NaH2PO4H2O 28.4 g/l) and fixed in 100% ethanol solution with 0.2% ammonium hydroxide for 2h. Ethanol is capable of rapid penetration, removes the hydration shell of proteins resulting in coagulation with breaking of the hydrogen bridges, and destruction of the tertiary structure, but the chemical composition of the amino acid sequence is preserved. Moreover, fixation in ethanol causes shrinking of the tissue specimens, but histological inspection of the tissues shows no morphological changes except slight shrinking (Gedrange et al 2008).

The material was dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol and embedded in paraffin. We tested sections of different thicknesses and the best slices were 8 µm thick, instead of the recommended 10 µm for vertebrate tissue. Sections were mounted on 0.5% white glue pre-coated histological slides and incubated in 1.5% silver nitrate solution in a heater at 50ºC. For optimization, experiments were carried out at temperatures ranging from 30ºC to 70ºC. We observed the impregnation everyday and verified that after five days, the tissue showed its best aspect. The sections were washed with distilled water for 2h and incubated in a 2% hydroquinone/ 5% formalin solution for 1h. The control sections were not exposed to silver nitrate incubation. Other sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H.E.) (hematoxylin for 12 min and eosin for 1 min), and mounted in Canada balsam. Photomicrographs were obtained with a Polivar binocular photomicroscope (Reichert).

 

Results and Discussion

The metallic impregnation technique adapted to the honeybee nervous system permitted the visualization of different features of brain morphology in darkly stained areas, especially in the optical lobes, central ocelli, mushroom bodies, antennal and alpha lobes (Fig 1a). The general characteristics observed by metallic impregnation for anatomical and morphological constitution of the honeybee brain presents features comparable with the description of A. mellifera reported by Mobbs (1982) and Nässel et al (1986), as well as of the Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Stocker & Lawrence 1981), Musca domestica L. (Kirschfeld 1967), and Periplaneta americana (L.) (Koontz & Edwards 1984). In the control experiment, dark staining was only observed in the compound eye pigmented cells and ocelli (Fig 1b).

In the optical lobe, metallic impregnation enhanced the morphological organization of this brain region. Details of the lamina, the outer and inner chiasmata (Fig 2a), the medulla, and the lobula were clearly seen as well as the monopolar neuron bodies and axons localized in the fenestrated layer of the lamina region due to the suitable staining (Fig 2b). The fenestrated layer is mainly composed of axonal bundles projecting from the retina to the lamina, and only the monopolar neuron bodies are part of the actual lamina.

Previous studies using metallic impregnation methods have also revealed differential constitution of insect brains, such as the observed in Calliphora erythrocephala (Meig.) and M. domestica (Strausfeld & Nassel 1980). Details of the localization of the neuronal bodies and dendritic arborization in the optical lobe were revealed by cobalt staining (Strausfeld & Obermayer 1976). However, these methods need 24h to 48h fixation, four-day pre-treatment and four- to 10-day impregnation. The metallic impregnation technique adapted to the honeybee brain described here requires less time than the one described by Strausfeld and collaborators for the optical lobe staining with 2h fixation, five-day impregnation and 3h post-treatment, with a similar result.

Analysis of the silver stained mushroom bodies revealed four prominences corresponding to the lip, collar and calyx basal areas, in addition to the peduncle (Fig 2c), and showed extensions of the neurons in the basal region reaching the peduncles and distinct areas of the calyces. A rapid Golgi impregnation method was also reported to quantify the morphology of the dendritic spines in the mushroom body calyx in the A. mellifera brain (Coss et al 1980). Nevertheless, Coss and collaborators had to fix the brains in 1% osmium tetroxide containing 2.5% potassium dichromate for 12h, and impregnate the tissues in 0.75% silver nitrate for 12h, in addition to including the brains in paraffin and sectioning at 120 μm to obtain similar results to those described here.

Further, silver impregnation clearly showed that the mushroom bodies were filled with the cellular bodies of the Kenyon cells and their axons, which are projected towards the calyces (Fig 2d). Similar results were reported by others (Farris et al 2001) by comparing the dendrites in the Kenyon cells in the collar region of the mushroom bodies between nurse and forager workers, using a modified Golgi impregnation protocol. The impregnation method adapted to honeybees allowed the same level of staining without employing the procedures of fixation in 4% glutaraldehyde for five days, incubation in a solution containing 1% osmium tetroxide, 2.5% potassium dichromate and 1% chloral hydrate for five days, impregnation in 0.75% silver nitrate for two days, inclusion in paraffin and sectioning at 25 μm thickness.

The metallic impregnation revealed that the interneurons of reduced cellular body surround the glomeruli in the antennal lobe (Fig 2e), which seem to be formed exclusively by fibers (Fig 2f) in the antennal lobe of the honeybee brain. In the ocelli (Fig 2g) and alpha lobe (Fig 2h) were observed extensions of retinula cells and neuronal extensions, respectively. Other studies using histological techniques with heavy metal in the motor system of P. americana also showed the extension of the neuronal bodies towards the deutocerebrum (Baba 2000). This technique also revealed the presence of neurofibrils in the alpha lobe, in agreement with Rybak & Menzel (1993). These authors applied metallic and osmium impregnation to study honeybee brains as described by Colonnier (1964) and Wigglesworth (1957), respectively. The main difference between Baba and Rybak & Menzel techniques with metallic impregnation with that in the present study was the cobalt injection before impregnation.

The metallic impregnation techniques described by Golgi, Ramón y Cajal, Bielschowsky and others, allow the mapping of brain regions by visualization of neuronal connections, neurofibrils and neuronal bodies. However, the H.E. technique routinely used in morphological studies to differentiate nuclei and cytoplasm is only able to distinguish brain regions. Furthermore, the metallic impregnation technique adapted to the honeybee brain is a simple and reliable method with time and handling complexity decreased if compared to traditional impregnation methods (Wigglesworth 1957, Colonnier 1964, Strausfeld & Obermayer 1976, Coss et al 1980, Strausfeld & Nässel 1980, Baba 2000, Farris et al 2001).

In conclusion, the adapted metallic impregnation technique has shown to be a useful tool for neuromorphological study of honeybee´s neural system, being a method simpler and faster than those described in the literature (Table 1). Future studies employing this technique will allow us to map neuronal circuits in adult and developing larvae as well as to determine possible morphological differences among castes (worker, queen and drone), subcastes (nurse and forager workers), or even other invertebrate nervous systems.

 

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from FAPEMIG as undergraduate scholarships for LKC and RRT. The authors would like to thank Dr. Wilson Pereira for providing the Neuroscience Laboratory facilities at the Federal University of Uberlandia, and Claudio Franco Lemos of the Apiários Girassol for maintenance of the honeybees. Appreciation is also extended to Miguel Diaz for the revision of this manuscript.

 

References

Baba Y (2000) New methods of dye application for staining motor neurons in an insect. J Neurosci Methods 98: 165-169.         [ Links ]

Behmer A O, Tolosa E M C, Freitas-Neto A G (1986) Manual de técnicas para histologia normal e patológica. São Paulo, Edart, 120p.         [ Links ]

Capaldi E A, Robinson G E, Fahrbach S E (1999) Neuroethology of spatial learning: the birds and the bees. Annu Rev Psychol 50: 651-682.         [ Links ]

Colonnier M (1964) The tangential organization of the visual cortex. J Anat 98: 327-344.         [ Links ]

Coss R G, Brandon J G, Globus A (1980) Changes in morphology of dendritic spines on honeybee calycal interneurons associated with cumulative nursing and foraging experiences. Brain Res 192: 49-59.         [ Links ]

Farris S M, Robinson G E, Davis R L, Fahrbach S E (1999) Larval and pupal development of the mushroom bodies in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. J Comp Neurol 414: 97-113.         [ Links ]

Farris S M, Robinson G E, Fahrbach S E (2001) Experience- and age-related outgrowth of intrinsic neurons in the mushroom bodies of the adult worker honeybee. J Neurosci 21: 6395-6404.         [ Links ]

Gedrange T, Mai R, Mack F, Zietek M, Borsos G, Vegh A, Spassov A, Gredes T (2008) Evaluation of shape and size changes of bone and remodeled bone substitute after different fixation methods. J Physiol Pharmacol 59: 87-94.         [ Links ]

Giurfa M (2003) Cognitive neuroethology: dissecting non-elementar learning in a honeybee brain. Cur Op Neurobiol 13: 726-735.         [ Links ]

Kirschfeld K (1967) Die projection der optischen umwelt auf das raster der rhabdomere im kimplexauge von Musca. Exp Brain Res 3: 248-270.         [ Links ]

Kloppenburg P (1995) Anatomy of the antennal motoneurons in the brain of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). J Comp Neurol 363: 333-343.         [ Links ]

Koontz M A, Edwards J S (1984) Central projections of first-order ocellar interneurons in two orthopteroid insects Acheta domestica and Periplaneta americana. Cell Tissue Res 236: 133-146.         [ Links ]

Lancet D (1986) Vertebrate olfactory reception. Annu Rev Neurosci 9: 329-355.         [ Links ]

Menzel R, Giurfa M (2001) Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee. Trends Cogn Sci 5: 62-71.         [ Links ]

Mobbs P G (1982) The brain of honeybee Apis mellifera L. the connections and spatial organization of the mushroom bodies. Philos Transact R Soc 298: 309-354.         [ Links ]

Nässel D R, Helgee A, Sivasubramanian P (1986) Development of axon paths of motorneurons after removal of target muscles in holometabolous insect. Brain Res 391: 211-219.         [ Links ]

Oleskevich S, Clements J D, Srinivasan M V J (1997) Long-term synaptic plasticity in the honeybee. J Neurophysiol 78: 528-532.         [ Links ]

Robinson G E, Fahrbach S E, Winston M L (1997) Insect societies and the molecular biology of social behavior. Bioessays 19: 1099-1108.         [ Links ]

Rybak J, Menzel R (1993) Anatomy of the mushroom bodies in the honey bee brain: the neuronal connections of the alpha-lobe. J Comp Neurol 334: 444-465.         [ Links ]

Snodgrass R E (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. New York, Comstock Public Association Cornell University Press, 150p.         [ Links ]

Stocker R F, Lawrence P A (1981) Sensory projections from normal and homeotically transformed antennae in Drosophila. Dev Biol 82: 224-237.         [ Links ]

Strausfeld N J (1980) The Golgi method: its application to the insects nervous system and the phenomenon of stochastic impregnation, p.132-205. In Strausfeld N J, Miller T A (eds) Neuroanatomical techiniques. Insect Nervous System. New York, Springer, 389p.         [ Links ]

Strausfeld N J, Nässel D R (1980) Neuroarchitecture of brain regions that subserve compound eyes in crustacea and insects, p.102-112. In Autrum H (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 200p.         [ Links ]

Strausfeld N J, Obermayer M (1976) Resolution of intraneuronal and transsynaptic migration of cobalt in the insect visual and central nervous systems. J Comp Physiol 110: 1-12.         [ Links ]

The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium (2006) Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature 443: 931-949.         [ Links ]

Wigglesworth V B (1957) The use of osmium in the fixation and staining of tissues. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 147: 185-199.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received 13/X/08.
Accepted 02/VII/10.

 

 

Edited by Fernando L Cônsoli - ESALQ/USP

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License