Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Potential bird dispersers of Psychotria in a area of Atlantic forest on Ilha Grande, RJ, Southeastern Brazil: a biochemical analysis of the fruits

Aves potenciais dispersoras de Psychotria em uma área de Floresta Atlântica, Ilha Grande, RJ, Sudeste do Brasil: uma análise bioquímica dos frutos

Abstracts

The present study assessed the fruiting pattern, bird foraging behavior, and sugar content of ripe fruits of two sympatric species of Rubiaceae (Psychotria brasiliensis and P. nuda). This study was carried out in an Atlantic forest area on Ilha Grande, RJ, between August 1998 and July 1999. Fruit production occurred year round, with a peak of mature P. brasiliensis fruits in December 1998 and another of P. nuda in February of 1999. Lipaugus lanioides (Cotingidae), Baryphtengus ruficapillus (Momotidae) and Saltator similis (Emberizidae) made the most frequent foraging visits to fruiting P. brasiliensis, so that L. lanioides and B. ruficapillus removed the fruits with sallying maneuvers while S. similis gleaned the fruits. Lipaugus lanioides was by far the most important consumer, and potentially the main disperser of P. brasiliensis. Birds of this genus are heavy frugivores in the tropical forests and are widely assumed to be important seed dispersers. The fruits were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively in relation to the amounts of sucrose and starch. Psychotria brasiliensis (the visited species) showed the smallest quantity of sucrose and the highest amount of starch. These findings suggest that what may influence the birds' choice of fruit is the proportion of starch in the Psychotria species studied here rather than the carbohydrate composition.

Psychotria; fruits; biochemical analysis


Os objetivos deste trabalho foram monitorar o padrão de frutificação, o comportamento de forrageamento de aves e o conteúdo de açúcares em frutos maduros de duas espécies simpátricas de Rubiaceae (Psychotria brasiliensis e P. nuda). O estudo foi realizado em área de Floresta Atlântica, na lha Grande, RJ, entre agosto de 1998 e julho de 1999. A frutificação ocorreu durante todo o ano com um pico de frutos maduros em dezembro de 1998 para P. brasiliensis e outro em fevereiro de 1999 para P. nuda. Lipaugus lanioides (Cotingidae), Baryphtengus ruficapillus (Momotidae) e Saltator similis (Emberizidae) foram os principais consumidores dos frutos de P. brasiliensis, sendo que L. lanioides e B. ruficapillus removeram os frutos adejando, enquanto S. similis os alcançou pousado nas plantas. Lipaugus lanioides foi o consumidor de frutos mais importante e potencialmente foi o principal dispersor das sementes de P. brasiliensis. As aves deste gênero estão entre os principais frugívoros especialistas de florestas tropicais e amplamente consideradas como importantes agentes dispersores de sementes. Os frutos foram analisados qualitativa e quantitativamente em relação às quantidades de açúcares livres e amido. A espécie visitada (P. brasiliensis) apresentou a menor quantidade de sacarose e a maior quantidade de amido. Os resultados sugerem que o consumo diferencial de frutos por espécies de aves não é influenciado pela composição de carboidratos, mas possivelmente pela proporção de amido nos frutos das espécies de Psychotria estudadas.

Psychotria; frutos; análise bioquímica


Potential bird dispersers of Psychotria in a area of Atlantic forest on Ilha Grande, RJ, Southeastern Brazil: a biochemical analysis of the fruits

Aves potenciais dispersoras de Psychotria em uma área de Floresta Atlântica, Ilha Grande, RJ, Sudeste do Brasil: uma análise bioquímica dos frutos

Almeida, E. M.I; Costa, P. F.II; Buckeridge, M. S.II; Alves, M. A. S.III

IPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

IIDepartamento de Botânica, IBUSP, Rua do Matão, 277, C. P. 11461, Cidade Universitária, Butantã, CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

IIIDepartamento de Ecologia, IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, CEP 20550-011, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Correspondence to Correspondence to: Maria Alice dos Santos Alves Departamento de Ecologia IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524 CEP 20550-011, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil, e-mail: masa@uerj.br

ABSTRACT

The present study assessed the fruiting pattern, bird foraging behavior, and sugar content of ripe fruits of two sympatric species of Rubiaceae (Psychotria brasiliensis and P. nuda). This study was carried out in an Atlantic forest area on Ilha Grande, RJ, between August 1998 and July 1999. Fruit production occurred year round, with a peak of mature P. brasiliensis fruits in December 1998 and another of P. nuda in February of 1999. Lipaugus lanioides (Cotingidae), Baryphtengus ruficapillus (Momotidae) and Saltator similis (Emberizidae) made the most frequent foraging visits to fruiting P. brasiliensis, so that L. lanioides and B. ruficapillus removed the fruits with sallying maneuvers while S. similis gleaned the fruits. Lipaugus lanioides was by far the most important consumer, and potentially the main disperser of P. brasiliensis. Birds of this genus are heavy frugivores in the tropical forests and are widely assumed to be important seed dispersers. The fruits were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively in relation to the amounts of sucrose and starch. Psychotria brasiliensis (the visited species) showed the smallest quantity of sucrose and the highest amount of starch. These findings suggest that what may influence the birds' choice of fruit is the proportion of starch in the Psychotria species studied here rather than the carbohydrate composition.

Keywords:Psychotria, fruits, biochemical analysis.

RESUMO

Os objetivos deste trabalho foram monitorar o padrão de frutificação, o comportamento de forrageamento de aves e o conteúdo de açúcares em frutos maduros de duas espécies simpátricas de Rubiaceae (Psychotria brasiliensis e P. nuda). O estudo foi realizado em área de Floresta Atlântica, na lha Grande, RJ, entre agosto de 1998 e julho de 1999. A frutificação ocorreu durante todo o ano com um pico de frutos maduros em dezembro de 1998 para P. brasiliensis e outro em fevereiro de 1999 para P. nuda. Lipaugus lanioides (Cotingidae), Baryphtengus ruficapillus (Momotidae) e Saltator similis (Emberizidae) foram os principais consumidores dos frutos de P. brasiliensis, sendo que L. lanioides e B. ruficapillus removeram os frutos adejando, enquanto S. similis os alcançou pousado nas plantas. Lipaugus lanioides foi o consumidor de frutos mais importante e potencialmente foi o principal dispersor das sementes de P. brasiliensis. As aves deste gênero estão entre os principais frugívoros especialistas de florestas tropicais e amplamente consideradas como importantes agentes dispersores de sementes. Os frutos foram analisados qualitativa e quantitativamente em relação às quantidades de açúcares livres e amido. A espécie visitada (P. brasiliensis) apresentou a menor quantidade de sacarose e a maior quantidade de amido. Os resultados sugerem que o consumo diferencial de frutos por espécies de aves não é influenciado pela composição de carboidratos, mas possivelmente pela proporção de amido nos frutos das espécies de Psychotria estudadas.

Palavras-chave:Psychotria, frutos, análise bioquímica.

INTRODUCTION

Fruit production by angiosperms and its consumption by vertebrates of several orders is an important tropical phenomenon, since 50 to 90% of the species of tropical trees or bushes produce fruits adapted to both consumption and dispersal by vertebrates (Howe & Smallwood, 1982), especially birds and mammals (Howe, 1986; Terborgh, 1986; and Fleming et al., 1987).

Different species of birds include fruits in their diet; however, frugivorous birds may be fruit specialists or feed primarily on seeds (seed predators) or arthropods, according to the availability of fruits in the environment. The interaction between fruits and animal dispersers is complex and is influenced by several features of both groups (Foster & McDiarmid, 1983). Characteristics such as fruit color, size, and nutritional quality, architecture of the infructescence, the phenology of fructification and the production of fruits may influence the foraging behavior of frugivores (Snow, 1971; Pineschi, 1990; Argel-de-Oliveira et al., 1996).

The family Rubiaceae is widely distributed in the Tropical and Subtropical regions of the world, while few species occur in the Temperate Zone. In the Atlantic forest, Rubiaceae is prominent mainly in the understorey (Gomes, 1996), where Psychotria L. is an important genus of Neotropical and Paleotropical forests (Burger & Taylor, 1993). The species of Rubiaceae, and particularly of Psychotria, produce fleshy fruits consumed by vertebrates, including birds (Morellato & LeitãoFilho, 1992). In a study of four areas with different ages of regeneration (three between five and fifty years old and a climax one) on Ilha Grande, RJ, Oliveira (2002) assigned the species Psychotria carthaginensis, P. brasiliensis and P. nuda as being late secondary species distributed in areas with 25, 50 years or older stages of regeneration and climax, respectively. The species P. vellosiana was classified as a climax species distributed in areas with 25 years of regeneration.

Recently, Martin-Gajardo & Morellato (2003) studied the phenology of some species of Rubiaceae (among them, six species of Psychotria) of the Atlantic forest. They observed that the production of fruits presents little seasonality and ripe fruits are found throughout the whole year, despite seasonal variations in temperature and humidity. Although there is some information about fruits of Psychotria being attractive to birds (Morellato & Leitão-Filho, 1992; Loiselle & Blake, 1993), little is known about birds as consumers of its fruits.

The present study assessed the fruiting phenology, bird foraging behavior, and biochemical analyses of ripe fruits of two sympatric species of Rubiaceae (Psychotria brasiliensis and P. nuda) in an Atlantic forest area.

METHODOLOGY

Study area

This study was carried out in an almost undisturbed Atlantic forest area on Ilha Grande (23° 10' 57" S and 44° 12' 54" W), municipality of Angra dos Reis, in southern Rio de Janeiro state. The altitude of the study area ranges from 140 m to 260 m, and the canopy is around 25 to 30 m. The climate is hot and humid with an annual average temperature of 23 °C (19.6° - 25.7°), while rainfall is approximately 2200 mm (data provided by Fundação Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social do Rio de Janeiro).

Phenology

Fruit production was recorded monthly, between August 1998 and July 1999, using a transection of 1 ha (1000 m x 10 m). The number of unripe and ripe fruits was counted in 19 individuals of P. brasiliensis and 24 individuals of P. nuda randomly selected in the transection. The ripe fruits were weighed (with an electronic scale to the nearest 0.0001 g) and measured (using calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm).

Observation of the birds

Visits by birds to each plant species (15 individuals per species) were monitored on four days for a total of 96 h between September and December 1998. Three or four plants were watched simultaneously each day. The bird species visiting the plants, the time, the number of fruits eaten and the foraging tactics were recorded, allocating an interval of five minutes to record the foraging tactics of each individual observed (Alves & Duarte, 1996). The classification of the foraging tactics was adapted from Remsen & Robson (1990) and Marini (1992), as follows: a) gleaning – the bird removes the fruits while perched on a branch close to the infructescence; and b) sallying – from a nearby perch the bird flies towards the infructescence, hovering or not in front of it, removing a fruit and usually returning to the same branch or another one (Figs. 1-3).




Comparative biochemical analysis of carbohydrates of P. brasiliensis and P. nuda fruits

Four mature fruits from four different individuals of each plant species were collected. These fruits were dehydrated in an oven at 60 °C and weighed every 15 min until the weight became constant. The dried fruits were ground and 10 mg of powder were extracted in 500 µL of 80% ethanol at 80 °C for 20 min. The purpose of this procedure was the extraction of soluble sugars. The mixture was centrifuged for two minutes at 13,000 g, and the supernatant removed for soluble sugar analyses. This procedure was repeated thrice and the precipitate and supernatants were combined. The alcohol extracts were freeze-dried and dissolved in deionized water. The total sugars were determined by the phenol sulphuric acid method (Dubois et al., 1956) and the reducing sugars by the method of Somogyi-Nelson (Somogyi, 1945).

The monosaccharides were analyzed by High Performance Anion Exchange Chromatography (Dionex DX-500) using a Carbopac PA1 sepa-ration column. Monosaccharides were separated isocratically in distilled water. Sugar was detected by Pulsed Amperometric Detection (PAD) using a post column base containing 500 mM NaOH. The detection of glucose, fructose and sucrose was performed by isocratic separation in 100 mM NaOH using the same aforementioned column. A minor contamination with other monosaccharides was detected but, being minimal, it did not influence the results of sucrose, glucose and fructose (Tiné et al., 2000).

The starch was analyzed by the following procedure: the pellet resulting from the above described extraction of soluble sugars was subjected to complete alcohol evaporation at ambient temperature for about 24 h, and 2.8 mL of distilled water and 0.1 mL of thermo-stable a-amylase (Megazyme) were added. After stirring, the material was incubated at 75 °C for 30 min, 0.1 mL of thermo-stable a-amylase was added and the mixture stirred for 30 min at 75 °C. One mL of 300 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.8 and 1 mL of amyloglucosidase (30 U/mL) in 100 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.8 were added. The mixture in the tube was stirred for a few minutes and then incubated at 50 °C for 30 min. The reaction was interrupted by the addition of 500 µL of 0.8 M perchloric acid, followed by stirring and centrifugation at 13,000 g for 3 min. 20 µL of the mixture was removed and placed in the wells of an ELISA plate. 150 µL of Glucose PAP Liquiform 1 (Labstet®) were added to each well and the plate was incubated at 30 °C for 15 min, with ELISA readings taken at 490 nm. The starch content was calculated as a percentage of the weight of the initial material (adapted from Santos et al., 2004).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The fruits of P. brasiliensis and P. nuda are purple drupes with yellow and red calyces, respectively. The fruits of these species exhibited significant differences in size and weight (Table 1).

Fruit production occurred year round (see also Almeida & Alves, 2000), with a peak of ripe P. brasiliensis fruits in December 1998. In that month, 4 of the 19 sampled individuals bore mature fruits (total of 19 mature fruits). In P. nuda, the major fruit production was in February 1999 (4 out of 24 individuals of the sample, with a total of 12 mature fruits).

Three bird species foraged on P. brasiliensis fruits. The most frequent visitor was Lipaugus lanioides (Contigidae, 63.6%, n = 11), followed by Baryphthengus ruficapillus (Momotidae, 27.3%, n = 11) and Saltator similis (Emberizidae, 9.1%, n = 11).

The foraging tactic used by B. ruficapillus was sallying. After alighting on the plant, the bird removed the fruit with a short descending flight and landed on the same plant, swallowing the whole fruit (Fig. 1). Saltator similis removed the fruits using the foraging tactic of gleaning. The individuals of this species landed on the plant and picked the fruits, crushing them with their beak turned up (Fig. 2). Lipaugus lanioides used the sally foraging tactic. After alighting on a perch next to the visited plant, individuals of this species generally collected the fruits during a flight, thereafter returning to the original perch or landing on a nearby one (Fig. 3). This bird species kept the fruit in its beak, knocking the calyx on a branch to remove it before eating the fruit.

Lipaugus lanioides was the main consumer of P. brasiliensis fruits and was the only species that removed the calyx from the fruits. This suggests L. lanioides is a frugivorous specialist, in contrast to the other two bird species. Lipaugus lanioides is a potentially important disperser of P. brasiliensis seed, particularly since it consumed more whole fruits and showed a specific behavior (removing calyx), also flying away from the parental plant soon after removing the fruits. Birds of this genus are among the heavy frugivorous species of the rain forests (Snow, 1981) and, together with the other members of the Cotingidae family, are important seed dispersers (Snow, 1971). Baryphthengus ruficapillus is a generalist species (Sick, 1997; Alves et al., 1999) which may contribute to the dispersal of P. brasiliensis. Saltator similis is known as an omnivorous species whose diet substantially includes seeds (Sick, 1997), and it must be a predator of P. brasiliensis seeds.

Due to the small number of ripe fruits per individual, even during the fruiting peaks (see above), a lower visit rate to P. brasiliensis bushes was expected. However, birds were not recorded foraging on P. nuda fruits, which were available in the same area during the same period and were subjected to the same observation effort as P. brasiliensis. It is interesting to note that although P. brasiliensis produces relatively few mature fruits, the most frequent consumer of its fruits was a species endangered both worldwide (Collar et al., 1992) and regionally (Alves et al., 2000). This species was not trapped as frequently as were other frugivorous bird species (e.g., Chiroxiphia caudata and Mionectes rufiventris) in the mist nets used in the study area (M.A.S. Alves, pers. obs.). However, these latter species were not recorded consuming Psychotria fruits. These findings suggest that, in the study area, P. brasiliensis may be an important resource for L. lanioides, reinforcing this bird's potential as the main seed disperser of this plant.

An analysis was made of the soluble carbohydrate content and composition and the starch and phenolic compound content (not shown) in an attempt to associate the fruits' chemical composition with the frequency of the birds' visits to the plants in question. Table 2 shows the results of a comparative analysis of the monosaccharides in P. brasiliensis and P. nuda fruits. The main components of the soluble sugars fraction are glucose and fructose. However, other monosaccharides such as galactose, fucose and mannose were also detected in minor proportions. The latter compounds are probably related to the fruit maturation process, during which degradation of cell wall polysaccharides occurs. Glucose and fructose probably derive from sucrose metabolism, possibly resulting to the mobilization of compounds stored in the fruits, as well as transport of photoassimilates. As Table 2 indicates, P. brasiliensis and P. nuda fruits showed similar proportions of glucose and fructose. However, P. brasiliensis fruits contained twice as much fucose and four times less rhamnose than P. nuda fruits. Fucose, rhamnose and galactose are probably related with the cell wall metabolism and are generally used as indicators of the ripening stage of fruit (Giovannoni, 2001). In the fruits of dicots, except for glucose and fructose, galactose may be a good indicator of the ripening stages of fruits. A rising level of this monossacharide may indicate that cell walls are being degraded, suggesting the occurrence of senescence, which is directly correlated with fruit ripening (Gross & Wallner, 1979). The proportion of carbohydrates in the fruits of both species indicated they were in the same ripening stage, since the proportions of monosaccharides of the cell wall were minimal and the levels of galactose in the two species were very similar.

The use of another program for separating sugars in HPAEC enabled us to view the glucose, fructose and sucrose simultaneously in the same chromatogram. As Table 3 indicates, the two species showed similar fructose – glucose ratios, but the proportion of sucrose was 2-fold higher in P. nuda than in P. brasiliensis. In addition, 0.54% of the dry weight of the P. brasiliensis fruits was starch, while that of P. nuda was only 0.13%, an inverse pattern to that of sucrose.

Together with the finding that the two species contained similar levels of phenolic compounds (data not shown), the results of the carbohydrate analyses suggested that both sugar compositions and their proportions were also similar in these species. However, the higher proportion of sucrose observed in P. nuda apparently was unrelated to the behavior of birds, since none of them consumed P. nuda fruits. These results suggest that the carbohydrate composition of fruits did not influence the birds' choice of fruit. However, the higher proportion of starch in P. brasiliensis fruits may have influenced their choice. On the other hand, attractive or repulsive compounds not included in this study may also explain the contrasting use of fruits by the two species.

The relatively low seasonality of environments such as the Atlantic forest may explain the availability of ripe fruits for different species in the community (Talora & Morellato, 2000) throughout the year. This means food resources are continually available for frugivores. However, the continuous fructification allied with the low number of ripe fruits per plant, as observed in the Psychotria species studied (Almeida & Alves, 2000), seems to increase the potential for seed dispersion over a long period of the year, possibly increasing the adaptive efficiency of these species.

Acknowledgments — This article describes some of the results of studies carried out for the "Southeastern Brazilian Ecosystems Ecology, Conservation and Management Program" and the "Southeastern Brazilian Vertebrate Ecology Project" (Laboratory of Vertebrate Ecology), both conducted under the auspices of the Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). We thank Dr. Marcia Regina Braga, from the Seção de Fisiologia e Bioquímica de Plantas of the Instituto de Botânica, SP for the phenolic analyses of the Psychotria fruits. The Centro de Estudos Ambientais e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (CEADS) at UERJ's Regional Campus on Ilha Grande, RJ, and the Sub-Reitoria de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa (SR-2/UERJ) provided support and facilities on Ilha Grande during the study. We are also indebted to an anonymous referee for his critical review of the manuscript, as well as Raquel V. Marques for the sketches of bird foraging tactics, Brunno A. N. Ribeiro for the first English draft, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) for supporting the study and a research grant for M. A. S. Alves (nº 302718/20036), and CAPES for supporting E. M. Almeida with a Ph. D fellowship. We are also grateful to Idea Wild for its financial support. The carbohydrate analysis was possible thanks to the financial support of Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (BIOTA-FAPESP grant nº 98/05124-8) (Brazil).

Received June 8, 2004 – Accepted September 29, 2004 – Distributed February 28, 2006

  • ALMEIDA, E. M. & ALVES, M. A., 2000, Fenologia de Psychotria nuda e P. brasiliensis (Rubiaceae) em uma área de Floresta Atlântica no Sudeste do Brasil. Acta. Bot. Bras., 14: 335-346.
  • ALVES, M. A. S. & DUARTE, M. F., 1996, Táticas de forrageamento de Conopophaga melanops (Passeriformes: Formicariidae) na área de Mata Atlântica da Ilha Grande, Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Ararajuba, 4: 110-112.
  • ALVES, M. A. S., RITTER, P. D., VECCHI, M. B., STORNI, A. & BERNARDES, A., 1999, Feeding rates of rufous-capped motmot Baryphtengus ruficapillus nestling in Atlantic Forest of Ilha Grande, RJ, Brazil. Ararajuba, 7: 31-34.
  • ALVES, M. A. S., PACHECO, J. F., GONZAGA, L. P., CAVALCANTI, R. B., RAPOSO, M., YAMASHITA, C., MACIEL, N. C. & CASTANHEIRA, M., 2000, Aves, pp. 113-124. In: H. G. Bergallo, C. F. D. Rocha, M. A. S. Alves & M. Van Sluys (orgs.) A Fauna ameaçada de extinção do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Editora da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EdUerj).
  • ARGEL-DE-OLIVEIRA, M. M., CASTIGLIONI, G. D. A. & SOUZA, S. B., 1996, Comportamento alimentar de aves frugívoras em Trema micrantha (Ulmaceae) em duas áreas alteradas do sudeste brasileiro. Ararajuba, 4: 51-55.
  • BURGER, W. & TAYLOR, C. M., 1993, Flora Costaricensis. Fieldiana, 33: 1-333.
  • COLLAR, N. J., GONZAGA, L. P., KRABBE, N., MADROÑO NIETO, A., NARANJO, L. G., PARKER III, T. A. & WEGE D. C., 1992, Threatened birds of the Americas The ICBP/IUCN Red data book. Cambridge: Smithsonian Inst. Press.
  • DUBOIS, M., GILLES, K. A., HAMILTON, J. K., REBERS, P. A & SMITH, F., 1956, Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350-356.
  • FLEMING, T. H., BREITWISCH, R. & WHITESIDES, G. H., 1987, Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 18: 91-109.
  • FOSTER, M. S. & MCDIARMID, R. W., 1983, Nutritional value of the aril of Trichilia cuneata, a bird-dispersed fruit. Biotropica, 15: 26-31.
  • GOMES, M., 1996, Rubiaceae, pp. 345-426. In: M. P. M. Lima e R. R. Guedes-Bruni (org.) Reserva Ecológica de Macaé de Cima, Nova Friburgo-RJ: Aspectos Florísticos das Espécies Vasculares Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
  • GIOVANNONI, J., 2001, Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 52: 725-749.
  • GROSS, K. C. & WALLNER, S. J., 1979, Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides during tomato fruit ripening. Plant Physiol., 63: 117-120.
  • HOWE, H. F. & SMALLWOOD, J., 1982, Ecology of seed dispersal. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 13: 201-228.
  • HOWE, H. F., 1986, Seed disperal by fruit-eating bird and mammals, pp. 123-190. In: D. R. Murray (ed.) Seed Dispersal Academic Press, New York, USA.
  • LOISELLE, B. A. & BLAKE, J. G., 1993, Spatial dynamics of understory avian frugivores and fruiting plants in lowland wet tropical forest. Vegetatio, 107-108: 177-189.
  • MARINI, M. Â., 1992, Foraging behaviour and diet of the Helmet Manakin. Condor, 94: 151-158.
  • MARTIN-GAJARDO, I. S. & MORELLATO L. P. C., 2003, Fenologia de espécies Rubiaceae do sub-bosque em floresta Atlântica no sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Brasil. Bot., 26: 299309.
  • MORELLATO, L. P. C. & LEITÃO-FILHO, H. F., 1992, Padrões de Frutificação e Dispersão na Serra do Japi, pp. 112-140. In: L. P. C. Morellato (org.) História Natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e Preservação de uma Área Florestal no Sudeste.
  • OLIVEIRA, R. R., 2002, Ação antrópica a resultantes sobre a estrutura e composição da Mata Atlântica na Ilha Grande, RJ. Rodriguésia, 53: 33-58.
  • PINESCHI, R. B., 1990, Aves como dispersores de sete espécies de Rapanea (Myrsinaceae) no maciço do Itatiaia, estados do Rio de Janeiro e Minas Gerais. Ararajuba, 1: 73-78.
  • REMSEN, J. V. & ROBSON, S. K., 1990, A classification scheme for foraging behavior of birds in terrestrial habitats. Studies in Avian Biology, 13: 144-160.
  • SANTOS, H. P., PURGATTO, E., MERCIER, H. & BUCKERIDGE, M. S., 2004, The control of xyloglucan mobilization in cotyledons of Hymenaea courbaril. Plant Physiology, 135: 287-299.
  • SICK, H., 1997, Ornitologia Brasileira Editora Nova Fronteira, Rio de Janeiro.
  • SNOW, D. W., 1971, Evolutionary aspects of fruit-eating by birds. Ibis, 113: 194-202.
  • SNOW, D. W., 1981, Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: A world survey. Biotropica, 13: 1-14.
  • SOMOGYI, M., 1945, A new reagent for the determination of sugars. J. Biol. Chem., 160: 61-63.
  • TALORA, D. C. & MORELLATO, P. C., 2000, Fenologia de espécies arbóreas em floresta de planície litorânea do sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Bot., 23: 13-26.
  • TERBORGH, J. W., 1986, Community aspects of frugivory in tropical forests, pp. 371-384. In: A. Estrada and T. H. Fleming (eds.) Frugivores and seed dispersal Dr. W. Junk, Hague, Netherlands.
  • TINÉ, M. A. S, CORTELAZZO A. L. & BUCKERIDGE M. S., 2000, Xyloglucan mobilisation in cotyledons of developing plantlets of Hymenaea courbaril L. (Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae). Plant Science, 154: 117-126.
  • Correspondence to:

    Maria Alice dos Santos Alves
    Departamento de Ecologia
    IBRAG, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
    Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524
    CEP 20550-011, Rio de Janeiro, RJ
    Brazil, e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      02 May 2006
    • Date of issue
      Feb 2006

    History

    • Accepted
      28 Feb 2006
    • Reviewed
      29 Sept 2004
    • Received
      08 June 2004
    Instituto Internacional de Ecologia R. Bento Carlos, 750, 13560-660 São Carlos SP - Brasil, Tel. e Fax: (55 16) 3362-5400 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: bjb@bjb.com.br