1. Introduction
The Atlantic Forest biodiversity hotspot includes a large number of species of fig, Ficus L. (Moraceae) (Carauta, 1989) that play an important role in providing key resources to many species - provisioning edible fruits, and contributing to the maintenance of faunal diversity (Shanahan et al., 2001). Many Ficus species are threatened with extinction, among them Ficus mexiae Standley that is classified as vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN, 2011). This is a rare medium-sized plant measuring up to 10 meters in height, which is restricted to Minas Gerais and Bahia (Carauta and Diaz, 2002). Little is known about the reproductive aspects of this plant, although there is one report of two Pegoscapus Cameron (1906) species of fig wasp, simultaneously occurring in its syconiums (Schiffler, 2002).
There are over than 800 known species of Ficus (Moraceae) genus distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world (Harrison, 2005), and for a long time it was believed that each species of fig had only one pollinating species of wasp (Ramirez, 1970; Ramirez, 1974; Wiebes, 1979). It is true for many species, because the fig wasps show a peculiar morphological adaptation, with a high level of phenological synchrony and many are indeed extremely specific about the host (Wiebes, 1979). On the other hand, several cases are reported in which multiple wasp species can act as pollinators for a fig tree, and this may occur from 25 to 50% all fig species (Cook and Rasplus, 2003; Machado et al., 2005). The simultaneous occurrence of more than one species of wasp that are Ficus pollinators had already been demonstrated by several authors (Rasplus, 1996; Weiblen, 2001; Wieblen, 2002; Vaamonde et al., 2002; Haine et al., 2006), as well in different continents (Compton et al., 1991; Kerdelhué et al., 1997). However, only one co-occurrence record is known within the South American, between two Pegoscapus (species not yet described) species in Ficus mexiae, without knowing which one is actually the pollinator (Schiffler, 2002). Considering that Pegoscapus sp 1 and Pegoscapus sp 2 possessed pollen in their mesoternary cavities (pollen pockets), Schiffler (2002) proposed the hypothesis that both species play a role in pollinating Ficus mexiae. Based on this information, this work presents preliminary results on Ficus mexiae pollination by Pegoscapus sp 1 and Pegoscapus sp 2 that occurs simultaneously in the plant's syconium.
2. Material and Methods
We analyzed 57 syconium collected from two native Ficus mexiae individuals, located in the Universidade Federal de Lavras' campus, in the city of Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil (21°13′43″ S and 44°59′04″ W). Before collection, the syconiums were individually covered by polyester nets (forming little bags) to retain emerging wasps. The bags were placed on the syconiums on May 14, 2001, and remained there during the time of wasp hatching (2 to 3 days). After the hatching, all the material was taken to the laboratory for sorting. Following this the hatching wasps were captured using an entomological aspirator and afterwards packed together with the original syconium, in flasks with a solution of 10% of formaldehyde. We counted the number of individuals for each wasp species present in each syconium and the number of ovaries with seeds. We also recorded measurements of the syconiums' size and weight. To verify if the data presented Gaussian distribution, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test (Zar, 1974) was applied. Spearman correlation was used to test the correlation between the abundance of Pegoscapus species and the syconium's structural data (Zar, 1974). The difference between the average individual number of Pegoscapus sp 1 and Pegoscapus sp 2 in the syconiums was tested using the Mann-Whitney (U test) (Zar, 1974).
3. Results and Discussion
We captured a total of 305 individuals (DP ± 101) of Pegoscapus per syconium, 16% of which were from Pegoscapus sp 1 and 71% Pegoscapus sp 2. The Ficus mexiae syconium presented an average size of 15.3 mm (DP ± 1.3 mm) and weight of 1.6 g (DP ± 0.3 g). As was expected, the heaviest syconiums were also the biggest (rs = 0.83; p < 0.0001) and the thickest (rs = 0.50; p < 0.01). The number of individuals from both Pegoscapus species increased as the syconium increased in size (rs = 0.27; p < 0.05). This correlation may become stronger when also taking account of the number of non-pollinating wasps. With an increase in the syconium size the production of seeds also increases (rs = 0.61; p < 0.001), possibly because it aids the entrance of more pollinator wasps (founders). There was a statistically significant correlation between the number of individual Pegoscapus sp 1 and the size of the syconium (rs = 0.37; p < 0.005), but the same pattern was not true for Pegoscapus sp 2. The number of individuals of Pegoscapus sp 1 was positively correlated with the number of seeds produced (rs = 0.48; p < 0.0002), suggesting that it does provide a pollinator function. However, and contrary to what was expected, the most abundant species (Pegoscapus sp 2) did not correlate with the seed production. Yet, in cases where only Pegoscapus sp 1 occurred (7%) or only Pegoscapus sp 2 (35%) seed production was recorded, and average size of seeds produced from both was similar (U = 14.5; p < 0.05; Figure 1), as was their average abundance (U = 17.5; p < 0.05; Figure 1). There was no difference between the average abundance of Pegoscapus sp 1 and Pegoscapus sp 2 (U = 414.5; p < 0.05), although their pair-wise abundance showed a negative correlation (rs = -0.70; p < 0.0001). This evidence of an antagonistic relation between these two Pegoscapus species suggests that these species may compete for ovaries on Ficus mexiae. However, independently of the interaction between these two wasps it provides evidence that both promote the pollination of Ficus mexiae.

Figure 1 Average abundance of wasps and seeds per syconium, when only one species of Pegoscapus occurs (error bars represent SD).
One species of Ficus may be host for two or more different pollinator or non pollinator wasp species (Wiebes, 1995), and one pollinator wasp species may have more than one Ficus species as a host (Compton, 1990, Ware and Compton, 1992; Rasplus, 1996). When the host specificity is broken, the process of introgression between figs could occur giving rise to new species, thereby contributing to the increased diversity of figs (Machado et al., 2005).
While preliminary, these results indicate that the F. mexiae population besides being maintained by more than one Pegoscapus, and therefore represent an important element in the complex dynamics of maintaining diversity in neotropical Ficus spp.