1 Introduction
Aquatic communities are highly impacted due to the damming of the rivers for power generation (Barletta et al., 2010), causing the homogenization of environments, introduction and permanence of exotic species, extinction of local species, loss of habitat, and interruption of fish migration (Agostinho et al., 1999, 2008). Furthermore, the water level variations caused by reservoir operations (Pamplin and Rocha, 2007) alter the richness and density of many organisms and interfere with such parameters as the water transparency and input of organic matter (Hunt and Jones, 1972; Palomaki, 1994; Furey et al., 2006).
Among the various components of aquatic biota, aquatic insects have been frequently utilized for predictions with regard to impact assessment because such species respond quickly to environmental alterations through species richness and abundance modifications (Hsu and Yang, 2005; Almeida et al., 2006). In tropical reservoirs, the assemblage of aquatic insects is mainly composed of nymphs of mayflies, dragonflies, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, and Diptera, with the latter represented primarily by the family Chironomidae (Peiró and Alves, 2006; Silva et al., 2009).
In temperate environments, the main factor responsible for structuring the assemblages of aquatic insects is the temperature (Ward and Stanford, 1982). Conversely, in the tropics, where this variable does not have large variations, other variables are crucial, including physical-chemical parameters of the water, seasonality, and habitat heterogeneity (Bispo and Oliveira, 1998; Silveira et al., 2006).
There are two distinct seasons in Central Brazil, a dry season and a rainy season, and there is a clear pattern of change in the aquatic insect community in stream environments, whereby the diversity and abundance increase during drought and decrease during the rainy season (Bispo et al., 2001; Thomazi et al., 2008). The reason for this fluctuation is that the environments are more stable in the dry season, allowing species colonization and establishment; in the rainy season, however, only species with morphological adaptations that allow them to resist the force of the water and the constant disturbances caused by rain can survive (Bispo and Oliveira, 1998; Bispo et al., 2001). This pattern was observed in a tropical lake (Lucca et al., 2010) dominated by Chironomidae and Oligochaeta in both seasons but with a higher density in the dry season. Although it is known that the damming of a river can strongly alter the structure of the zoobenthic community (Jorcin and Nogueira, 2008), the temporal pattern of this particular community is still not well understood.
Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that there is an increase in the richness and abundance of aquatic insects in the rainy season in a Neotropical reservoir, with the premise that high levels of water provide greater allochthonous material input and diversity of habitats and, thus, better conditions for colonization. Moreover, due to a lack of knowledge regarding the fauna of the study region, we also characterized the assemblage of aquatic insects in the Serra da Mesa Reservoir.
2 Material and Methods
2.1 Study site
The Serra da Mesa Reservoir is located in the north of Goiás State, near the border with the state of Tocantins (Figure 1), and is the main drainage basin of the Tocantins River and four tributaries: the Tocantinzinho, Bagagem, Almas, and Maranhão rivers (Andrade, 2002).

Figure 1 Location of the Serra da Mesa Reservoir in Brazil. The numbers 1-7 represent the sampling points.
The dam’s hydroelectric Serra da Mesa was closed in 1996 in the upper Tocantins River and became the largest reservoir in the country by volume of water and the fifth in the flooded area (Albrecht et al., 2009). The reservoir is characterized as having a tropical climate, with rainy and dry periods (Köppen AW) and average temperatures of approximately 20°C. Moreover, the site is included in the Cerrado biome, which has two well-defined seasons: dry in winter and wet in summer, with most of the rainfall occurring from November to March (De Filippo et al., 1999).
2.2 Sampling procedures
Samples were collected in August and November of 2009 and March and September of 2010, with one sampling each month: two in the dry season (August 2009 and September 2010) and two in the rainy season (November 2009 and March 2010), with seven points for each sample (Figure 1).
Aquatic insects were collected using a Petersen grab device (Davanso and Henry, 2006) at deep sites to obtain three samples at each site; a hand net (mesh 250 µm) was used at shallow sites (Edia et al., 2010), with a sampling effort of five minutes per collection point. The two methodologies were used because they are complementary and faithfully represent the aquatic insect community.
The specimens were identified to the family level according to Merritt and Cummins (1996) and Mugnai et al. (2010). The biological material was preserved in 90% ethanol for later identification and thereafter preserved in 70% ethanol and deposited in the scientific collection of the Laboratory of Ecological Research and Science Education, State University of Goiás (Anápolis – Brazil).
2.3 Data analysis
To verify the existence of patterns in the aquatic insect community, an analysis of Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) was performed using the logarithm of the aquatic insect abundance, with each point as a sampling unit and the season (dry or rainy) as the group variable. NMDS is a method of ordination, and the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used as a measure of distance (Legendre and Legendre, 1998). We used a maximum number of iterations 250 to obtain the minimum stress. This method does not assume linearity or normality of the data.
To evaluate the influence of the dry and rainy seasons on the aquatic insect community, paired t tests comparing the beta diversity, richness, and abundance at each point in the dry and rainy seasons were performed. Therefore, the null hypothesis that there was no difference between the dry and rainy periods for these attributes was tested. The beta diversity was estimated using the dissimilarity measure estimated by the quantitative index of Sorensen (Chao et al., 2005). This index uses the relative abundance to measure the degree of distinction in taxonomic composition at each site, and the mean of this distinction is the measure of beta diversity. To assess whether the variations in the water level would cause changes in the community structure, we calculated the Pearson correlation index between these attributes and the reservoir level. This analysis used the logarithm of the abundance to reduce the weight of the dominant groups. The reservoir levels were obtained using data provided by FURNAS (manager of the Serra da Mesa Reservoir).
Because it was not possible to identify some taxa more specifically, the family level was the taxonomic resolution used in all analyses, thereby allowing the maintenance of a pattern between all the groups. Furthermore, the family level responds in a similar manner as more specific levels, such as genus and species (Marshall et al., 2006). All analyses were performed using the R platform, version 2.15.3, of the R Development Core Team (2012), with the aid of the MASS (Venables and Ripley, 2002) and Vegan (Oksanen, 2005) packages. The level of significance adopted was α < 0.05.
3 Results
We collected 35,028 larval forms of aquatic insects (9,513 in dry period and 25,515 in the rainy season) belonging to seven orders (Table 1). Among the 33 families collected, only 12 occurred in the dry season, while all occurred in the rainy season. The order Diptera was the most abundant, with approximately 80% of the total sampling; of these, the Chironomidae family was the most representative, with 27,376 specimens collected. The second most abundant order was Ephemeroptera, with 2,317 specimens; Trichoptera was the third, with 1,758 specimens.
Table 1 Taxonomic composition and abundance of the families of aquatic insects collected in the Serra da Mesa Reservoir, Goiás.
Season | |||
---|---|---|---|
Dry | Rainy | ||
Order | Family | ||
Diptera | Chironomidae | 7755 | 19621 |
Ceratopogonidae | 39 | 605 | |
Chaoboridae | 0 | 414 | |
Tabanidae | 0 | 5 | |
Empididae | 0 | 1 | |
Hemiptera | Notonectidae | 7 | 153 |
Corixidae | 0 | 1055 | |
Belastomatidae | 0 | 52 | |
Vellidae | 0 | 11 | |
Nepidae | 0 | 7 | |
Naucoridae | 66 | 29 | |
Noteridae | 0 | 15 | |
Hydrometridae | 0 | 1 | |
Coleoptera | Girynidae | 0 | 124 |
Elmidae | 0 | 12 | |
Dytiscidae | 0 | 3 | |
Curcullionidae | 0 | 2 | |
Hidrophilidae | 0 | 3 | |
Ptylodactilidae | 0 | 1 | |
Torrindicolidae | 0 | 1 | |
Staphylinidae | 0 | 1 | |
Scirtidae | 0 | 3 | |
Ephemeroptera | Caenidae | 183 | 869 |
Baetidae | 532 | 470 | |
Leptohyphidae | 4 | 255 | |
Leptophlebiidae | 3 | 1 | |
Odonata | Libellulidae | 74 | 447 |
Coenagrionidae | 44 | 400 | |
Gomphidae | 0 | 1 | |
Trichoptera | Polycentropodidae | 801 | 880 |
Hydroptilidae | 0 | 67 | |
Leptoceridae | 5 | 5 | |
Lepidoptera | Pirallidae | 0 | 1 |
Total | 9513 | 25515 | |
The richness and abundance were higher in the rainy season than the dry season (Table 1). Nonetheless, the Chironomidae family was responsible for most of the specimens in both periods, contributing over 76% of the relative abundance in the rainy season and 81% in the dry season (Figure 2). However, the orders Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera were higher in the dry season.

Figure 2 Relative abundance in the dry and rainy seasons for the aquatic insect families sampled in the Serra da Mesa Reservoir. (A) Families contributing ~90% of abundance without Chironomidae and (B) relative abundance of the Chironomidae family, which is separated due the high value in both seasons.
The composition of the aquatic insect community differed between the sampling periods (rainy and dry), showing a clear correlation between the points collected in the same season (Figure 3). The ordination reached a final stress value of 13,335 (p < 0.05). The values of beta diversity, richness, and abundance were higher in the rainy season (Figure 4).

Figure 3 Analysis of Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) of the assemblage of aquatic insects in the Serra da Mesa Reservoir, Brazil.

Figure 4 Paired t test for heterogeneous variances applied to the variation of the richness (A), beta diversity (B), and abundance (C), aquatic insects in the two seasons sampled. All values were significant (p < 0.05). Means are related to average values per point in each season (dry and rainy).
The reservoir level ranged from 52.75 meters in the dry season to 69.92 meters in the rainy season, and these variations influenced the richness (r = 0.75, p < 0.05) and abundance (r = 0.57, p < 0.05) of aquatic insects but not the beta diversity (r = - 0.21, p > 0.05).
4 Discussion
Testing our initial hypothesis, we found that the richness, diversity, and abundance of insects were higher in the rainy season, most likely due to the increase in habitat heterogeneity and input of allochthonous material during this period. Regardless, it is important to note that the majority of the individuals collected belonged to the Chironomidae family. This result can be attributed to their ability to colonize, as most of the species of this family can tolerate low water-quality conditions, such as polluted environments (Simião-Ferreira et al., 2009), and low oxygen concentrations (Lee et al., 2006). Moreover, these insects live in high densities (Piedras et al., 2006), increasing their numerical abundance.
In addition to Chironomidae, the families Baetidae and Caenidae (Ephemeroptera) and Polycentropodidae (Trichoptera) were very abundant at several sampling points. However, these families are characteristic for belonging to orders that are considered good indicators of environmental quality (Barbola et al., 2011). Therefore, the findings suggest that the dominance of Chironomidae is not directly associated with poor conditions of the environment under study but most likely to the availability of organic matter, which serves as both food and refuge for the species of Chironomidae.
The seasonal rainfall of central Brazil is one of the main environmental factors controlling the aquatic biota (Bittencourt-Oliveira et al., 2012; Santos-Wisniewski and Rocha, 2007) because the temperature variations do not have sufficient amplitude to alter the patterns of the communities. Indeed, the structure of the aquatic insect communities is dependent, among other factors, on the physical-chemical conditions of the water, substrate availability, and biological interactions (Silveira et al., 2006; Vannote et al., 1980). Although we did not obtain information on the physic-chemical parameters of the water, we noted the influence of the increasing water level on the community because the highest values of richness and abundance were observed in the two samples collected in the rainy season.
Normally, the pattern of the influence of seasonality on the richness and abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates in lotic systems is based on the dry season providing better conditions for most families (Bispo and Oliveira, 1998). In contrast, the richness and abundance in the Serra da Mesa Reservoir increased in the rainy season, time at which the level water increased approximately 17 meters. This increase flooded a large degree of the vegetation, providing better conditions to the specialists families (Thornton et al., 1990; Esteves, 1998) and a greater availability of food due to the input of the allochthonous material that is critical to the functioning and balance of aquatic communities (Rezende and Mazzoni, 2005). Families like Corixidae, Hidroptilidae, Caenidae and Leptohyphidae, are directly dependent on the amount of vegetal material in the environment, and all increased their abundances in the rainy season.
Therefore, the pattern of greater abundance during the rainy season is the opposite to that found in streams because richness in the latter environments is reduced due to larval drift caused by rainfall (Baptista et al., 2001; Bispo et al., 2001, 2006; Thomazi et al., 2008).
Is important to note that the variations in the reservoir level are controlled according to the production of energy, causing daily changes in the level and potentially influencing the community structure (Agostinho et al., 2000). Additionally, Hunt and Jones (1972) highlight that a rapid decrease in the water level can exclude individuals from the water, which then die when exposed to the sun. Furthermore, Prus et al. (1999) concluded that a range of variation in water level of up to two meters does not alter the structure of the community, whereas 10 meters can be sufficient to cause species loss. At our study site, the level varied approximately 17 meters during the period examined, which caused the almost complete restructuring of the community, with the exception that Chironomidae continued to be the most abundant.