SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.75 número1Helminths of the frog Pleurodema diplolister (Anura, Leiuperidae) from the Caatingain Pernambuco State, Northeast BrazilBrazilian scientist is part of elite group of researchers fighting cancer, obtains an unprecedented patent in the United States índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Brazilian Journal of Biology

versión impresa ISSN 1519-6984

Braz. J. Biol. vol.75 no.1 São Carlos enero/mar. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.09914 

Notes and Comments

Migration rate and genetic diversity of two Drosophila maculifrons (Duda, 1927) populations from Highland Araucaria Forest Fragments in Southern Brazil

DC. Silva a  

LPB. Machado a  

RP. Mateus a   *  

aPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Evolutiva, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste – UNICENTRO, Rua Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá, 3, CEP 85040-080, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil


Flies from the Drosophilidae family have been suggested as appropriated for the assessment of the effects of habitat fragmentation (e.g., Mata et al., 2010). Cavasini et al. (2014) evaluated the Drosophilidae assemblages of Araucaria Forest fragments in Guarapuava/PR (southern of Brazil), including one studied here. They concluded that the areas are in intermediate state of conservation, and the size of the preserved area and/or connection with other fragments are important and should be considered for the establishment of conservation units. In this context, we analyzed the genetic variability of D. maculifrons (Duda, 1927), a forest dwelling species that belongs to the guaramunu group, collected in two conservation units of highland Araucaria Forest fragments in Guarapuava/PR, in order to establish parameters of genetic diversity and levels of gene flow. Thus, we expect to obtain insights about the connectivity level and its importance to conservation.

The two areas (Parque Municipal das Araucárias – PMA: 25° 23’ 36” S, 51° 27’ 19” W, with 43 ha; Parque Municipal São Francisco da Esperança – SSF: 25° 03’ 52” S, 51° 17’ 37” W, with 84,7 ha) are located 36 kilometers apart from each other and at about 1,100 m above the sea level. The genetic variability was analyzed using nine allozymatic (Est, Gpdh, Idh, Me, Pgm, Hk, Mdh-1, Mdh-2 and Mdh-3Mateus and Sene, 2003) and nine microsatellite loci (034, 053, 057, 087, 095, 096, 099, 102 and 118 – Laborda et al., 2009). For allozyme data, the parameter Θ and migration rates M were inferred through the MIGRATE-n v3.6.4 software (Beerli, 2012). Assuming an average mutation rate of 1.28x10–6 per locus per generation (Voelker et al., 1980), average Θ estimates were translated to estimates of average effective population sizes (i.e. Ne = Θ/4μ) for each population.

The allozymatic genetic diversities (Ho) for both populations (Table 1) were lower than those found by Saavedra et al. (1995) for D. maculifrons (0.2831) in the Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. They were also lower than those found by Machado et al. (2012) for D. ornatifrons (Duda, 1927), a closely related species of D. maculifrons, collected in the same areas (PMA – 0.3609; SSF – 0.4060). It is noteworthy that, for allozymes, D. maculifrons and D. ornatifrons of SSF showed higher genetic diversity. For microsatellites, the Ho values obtained (Table 1) were lower than those found by Heinz (2012) for D. mediopunctata (Dobzhansky and Pavan, 1943), a closely related species of the tripunctata group, in two areas of Guarapuava/PR, PMA (0.5385) and Fazenda Brandalise (0.5062).

Table 1 Allozymes and microsatellites genetic variability parameters for two Drosophila maculifrons natural populations from Guarapuava/PR (Brazil). 

Markers Populations1 N2 N.L.3 N.A.4 % (0.95)5 H.W.6 Ho7 He8
Allozymes PMA 51 8 3.00 37.5 66.7 0.1943 0.2933
SSF 50 9 2.44 55.6 60.0 0.2538 0.2651
Microsatellites PMA 32 8 6.25 100 0 0.3994 0.7470
SSF 41 9 7.78 100 11.1 0.3838 0.7444

1 PMA = Parque Municipal das Araucárias, SSF = Parque Municipal São Francisco da Esperança; 2Sample size; 3Number of loci; 4Average number of alleles per loci; 5Proportion of polymorphic loci (more frequent allele not more than 95%); 6Proportion of loci out of Hardy-Weinberg expectations among the polymorphic; 7Mean observed heterozygosity; 8Mean expected heterozygosity.

For allozymes, the genetic distance indexes resulted in a low to moderate differentiation between PMA and SSF (Nei’s D = 0.0248; Fst = 0.0556). Low genetic differentiation for D. maculifrons was also recently detected for COI and COII mitochondrial genes (Cenzi de Ré et al., 2014). On the other hand, for microsatellites, low genetic differentiation was not observed (D = 0.4174; Fst = 0.0901), probably because of its high variability. Therefore, despite the two populations are somewhat genetically similar (see Table 1), they depict some degree of differentiation. This is corroborated by PMA showing one locus less than SSF for both markers, and both populations presented several exclusive alleles (PMA: allozymes - 5; microsatellites - 13; SSF: allozymes - 3; microsatellites - 33).

The migration rates and population size estimations showed that SSF supplies much more migrants to PMA than otherwise (MSSF→PMA = 2,160; MPMA→SSF = 12.416), contributing to a higher average effective population size to PMA (NePMA = 4.629 x 1016; NeSSF = 8.496 x 103). Theses results indicated that size (of the fragment) matters regarding migration. SSF is a conservation unit twice larger than PMA (not taking in account that SSF is surrounded by several other fragments of Araucaria forest in private properties, which must double or even triple the total size of the area, and PMA is surrounded by crop plantations and Guarapuava city limits) and this is probably driving the high rates of migrants between these areas (e.g., Schiffer et al., 2007). Moreover, the amount of migration detected is probably the main cause of the low genetic differentiation found for allozymes here, but other evolutionary forces, such as genetic drift and mutation rates, for example, must be in action to generate and maintain the differentiation detected for microsatellites.

Acknowledgements

Funds were provided by CNPq (RP Mateus, grant number 479719/2011-0), SETI/Fundação Araucária (R. P. Mateus, grant number 868/2012); CAPES (DC Silva Master’s Fellowship); FINEP; and UNICENTRO.

References

BEERLI, P., 2012. MIGRATE documentation (version 3.2.1). Technical Report. Available from: <http://popgen.sc.fsu.edu>. Access in: 28 Apr. 2014. [ Links ]

CAVASINI, R., BUSCHINI, MLT., MACHADO, LPB. and MATEUS, RP., 2014. Comparison of Drosophilidae (Diptera) assemblages from two highland Araucaria Forest fragments, with and without environmental conservation policies. Brazilian Journal of Biology, vol. 74, no. 4. [ Links ]

CENZI DE RÉ, FC., GUSTANI, EC., OLIVEIRA, APF., MACHADO, LPB., MATEUS, RP., LORETO, ELS. and ROBE, LJ., 2014. Brazilian populations of . Drosophila maculifrons (Diptera, Drosophilidae): low diversity levels and signals of a population expansion after the Last Glacial MaximumBiological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London, vol. 112, no. 1, p. 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bij.12244. [ Links ]

HEINZ, NP., 2012. Variabilidade molecular sazonal de Drosophila mediopunctata (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Guarapuava: UNICENTRO. Dissertação de Mestrado. [ Links ]

LABORDA, PR., KLACZKO, LB. and SOUZA, AP., 2009. Drosophila mediopunctata microsatellites. II: Cross- species amplification in the tripunctata group and other species. DrosophilaConservation Genetics Resources, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 281-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12686-009-9069-9. [ Links ]

MACHADO, LPB., SILVA, DC., SIMÃO, DP. and MATEUS, RP. 2012. Spatial variation of genetic diversity in Drosophila species from two different South America environments. In CALISKAN, M. Genetic variation in animals. Rijeka: Intech. p. 45-62.. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/32971. [ Links ]

MATA, RA., MCGEOCH, M. and TIDON, R., 2010. Drosophilids (Insecta, Diptera) as Tools for Conservation Biology. Natureza & Conservação, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 60-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/natcon.00801009. [ Links ]

Mateus, RP. and Sene, FM., 2003. Temporal and spatial allozyme variation in the South American cactophilic Drosophila antonietae (Diptera; Drosophilidae). Biochemical Genetics, vol. 41, no. 7-8, p. 219-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025506301239. PMid:14587665 [ Links ]

SAAVEDRA, CCR., VALENTE, VLS. and NAPP, M., 1995. An ecological/genetic approach to the study of enzymatic polymorphisms in Drosophila maculifrons.Brazilian Journal of Genetics, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 147-164. [ Links ]

Schiffer, M., Kennington, WJ., Hoffmann, AA. and Blacket, MJ., 2007. Lack of genetic structure among ecologically adapted populations of an Australian rainforest Drosophila species as indicated by microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Ecology, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 1687-1700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03200.x. PMid:17402983 [ Links ]

Voelker, RA., Schaffer, HE. and Mukai, T., 1980. Spontaneous allozyme mutations in : rate of occurrence and nature of the mutants. Drosophila melanogasterGenetics, vol. 94, no. 4, p. 961-968. PMid:17249027. [ Links ]

Received: May 26, 2014; Accepted: June 30, 2014

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.