Positive relationships between insects and negative with spiders on Acacia auriculiformis (Fabaceae) plants in the savannah biome and their distribution pattern

Relações positivas entre insetos e negativos com aranhas em plantas de Acacia auriculiformis (Fabaceae) no bioma savana e seus padrões de distribuição

Abstract

Forest restoration is mainly based on plant-soil relationships and plant species with economic potential, but those between insects and other arthropods are also important to this reestablishment. The objective was to evaluate, during 24 months, the relationships between tending ants, Hemiptera phytophagous, predators and their distribution pattern (aggregated, random or uniform). The arthropods were sampled, stored and identified and their relationships and distribution patterns calculated with the BioDiversity-Pro software. The number of tending ants and phytophagous Hemiptera, Brachymyrmex sp. and Aethalion reticulatum, Cephalotes and Aleyrodidae were positively correlated. Tending ants were negatively correlated with Sternorrhyncha predators on A. auriculiformis saplings. The distribution of arthropods was aggregated, except for Teudis sp. and Cephalocoema sp., with a random pattern. The herbivores Stereoma anchoralis, Aethalion reticulatum and Tetragonisca angustula and the predators Brachymyrmex sp. and Dolichopodidae were the most abundant arthropods. The relationships between the arthropods studied on A. auriculiformis indicate that this plant, even introduced, is suitable for programs to recover degraded areas in the savannah.

Keywords:
aggregate; dispersal; random; savannah; tending ants; tropical

Resumo

A restauração florestal é baseada nas relações planta-solo e espécies vegetais com potencial econômico, mas aquelas entre insetos e outros artópodes são, também, importantes para esse processo. O objetivo foi avaliar as relações entre formigas, fitófagos Hemiptera e predadores e a distribuição (agregada, aleatória ou regular) de artrópodes, por 24 meses, em mudas de Acacia auriculiformis utilizadas na recuperação de áreas degradadas. Os artrópodes foram amostrados, armazenados e identificados e suas relações e padrões de distribuição calculados com o software BioDiversity-Pro. Os números de formigas cuidadoras se correlacionaram, positivamente, com os dos Hemiptera fitófagos Aethalion reticulatum, Brachymyrmex sp. e Cephalotes e Aleyrodidae. Insetos cuidadores de Hemiptera foram, negativamente, correlacionados com predadores Sternorrhyncha em plantas de A. auriculiformis. A distribuição dos artrópodes foi agregada, exceto Teudis sp. e Cephalocoema sp., com padrão aleatório. Aethalion reticulatum, Stereoma anchoralis e Tetragonisca angustula foram os herbívoros e Brachymyrmex sp. e Dolichopodidae os predadores mais abundantes. As relações entre os artrópodes estudados em A. auriculiformis indicam que esta planta, mesmo introduzida, é adequada para programas de recuperação de áreas degradadas no cerrado.

Palavras-chave:
agregado; aleatória; dispersão; formigas cuidadoras; savana; tropical

1. Introduction

Forest restoration is mainly based in plant-soil relationships including the use of Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex Beth (Fabales: Fabaceae) with litter deposition with high N contents (Mota et al., 2023) and economic importance (Manhães et al., 2013). However, the relationships between organisms, one of the main indicators of ecosystem restoration, need further studies (Moir et al., 2018; Oliveira et al., 2021). Arthropods are important in nutrient cycling (Manhães et al., 2013), honeydew supply (Moir et al., 2018) and bird food (Valencia-Cuevas and Tovar-Sánchez, 2015), but defoliators reduce plant development (Almeida et al., 2021; Mota Filho et al., 2021). In addition, insects respond to environmental changes and, therefore, they are used as bioindicators (Mota et al., 2023; Oliveira et al., 2021) and to evaluate tritrophic interactions after savannah fires (Pires and Del-Claro, 2014). Increasing temperature changes the patterns and guild structure of herbivorous insects associated to host plants (Monteiro et al., 2020) and temperature, relative humidity, foliage chemistry, changes in plant development and exposure to predators impact arthropods (Schowalter et al., 2005). The sequential flowering of Malpighiaceae species affects the dynamics of interactions between herbivores, ants and plants within multitrophic networks, and the quantity and quality of food resources directly impact their population and community (Vilela et al., 2014). The ant species visiting Peixotoa tomentosa A. Juss (Malpighiaceae) floral nectaries may be more critical to the outcome of plant-ant interaction than the herbivore abundance (Vilela et al., 2014). This emphasizes the importance of using the adequate plants for reforestation programs and ecosystem restablishment.

The potential of arthropods as conservation indicators has been demonstrated in oak plantations (Valencia-Cuevas and Tovar-Sánchez, 2015). Mutualistic relationships affect community structure and species interactions and, therefore, those between ants need further studies (Guerra et al., 2011; Pires and Del-Claro, 2014). Fire altered the ant community on plants with extrafloral nectaries in tropical savanna in Brazil (Pires and Del-Claro, 2014). However, the knowledge on savanna recovering programs is limited.

Savannah cover about one third of the Earth's surface and anthropogenic activities increase vegetation and soil losses in this biome. Savannah soils are rich in potassium (K), but plant productive in this biome is low due to reduced nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and organic matter. In addition, these soils are shallow, rocky, and compacted, facilitating the carryover of nutrients after organic matter deterioration (Tang and Li, 2014). Vegetation affects temperature, humidity, and wind speed and, consequently, floristic composition and species diversity (Valencia-Cuevas and Tovar-Sánchez, 2015).

The Acacia spp. (Fabales: Fabaceae) growth in disturbed areas (Balieiro et al., 2018) is rapid with biological fixation of atmospheric nitrogen (BFAN) by associated rhizobacteria (Hung et al., 2017). Acacia auriculiformis stands out for its wood durability, low susceptibility to diseases and adaptability to soil variations such as erosion, low fertility, swamps, and saline (Wang et al., 2017). This plant increases moisture retention, deposition of potassium and organic carbon in the soil (through litter) and by phytoextracting heavy metals through mycorrhizal symbiosis (Rana and Maiti, 2018). Acacia auriculiformis is used in ecological restoration, but the distribution of the arthropod fauna in the treetops of this plant needs further studies (Nghiem et al., 2011), especially in commercial plantations (Hegde et al., 2013). This is necessary; as this plant is exotic, used in soil recovery and commercially important (Hegde et al., 2013) with extrafloral nectaries (Agrawal et al., 2006). These structures are important to fauna (Agrawal et al., 2006), as food for ants, bees, and wasps (Moir et al., 2018). Ants, in turn, protect the plant against herbivores by reducing leaf area losses and increasing fruit production (Pires and Del-Claro, 2014). The richness and diversity of phytophagous arthropods are usually lower on introduced plants with a great number of generalist herbivores (Valencia-Cuevas and Tovar-Sánchez, 2015).

Conservation studies based on the biogeographic theory use monitoring data over longer periods (Price et al., 2004). The role of each species in the community, such as A. auriculiformis, an introduced plant (Agrawal et al., 2006; Silva et al., 2023) and the relationships between insects, as indicators of ecosystem stability and recovery, should be studied. The objective was to evaluate, during 24 months, the relationships between tending ants, Hemiptera phytophagous, predators and the distribution pattern (aggregated, random or uniform) of arthropods on A. auriculiformis saplings used to recover degraded areas. The tested hypotheses are that tending ants benefit sucking insects by protecting them against predators and that the distribution of arthropods on the A. auriculiformis canopy can be aggregated (i), high population density, random (ii), probably determined by chance, oruniform (iii) with regular distribution (Rodrigues et al., 2010).

2. Methods

2.1. Study area

The study was carried out in a severely degraded area of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (ICA/UFMG) in the municipality of Montes Claros, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (latitude of 16º51'38 S, longitude of 44º55' 00” W, altitude 943 m) for 24 months (April 2015 to March 2017). The climate of the area, according to the Köppen climate classification (Alvares et al., 2013), is of dry tropical with annual precipitation between 1,000 and 1,300 mm, dry winter, and average annual temperature ≥18ºC. The soil is of the Litholic Neosol type, with an Alic horizon with described physicochemical characteristics (Silva et al., 2020).

2.2. Experimental design

Seedlings of A. auriculiformis were prepared in March 2014 in a nursery in plastic bags (16 x 24 cm) with substrate mixed with 160 g of reactive rock phosphate. The seedlings, with 30 cm high, were planted in holes (40 x 40 x 40 cm) spaced two meters apart. The soil from these holes was corrected with dolomitic lime, increasing the base saturation to 50%, and adding gypsum, micronutrients, rock phosphate, potassium chloride and trace elements, according to soil analysis. Twenty liters of dehydrated sewage sludge with chemical and biological attributes described (Silva et al., 2020) were placed per hole in a single dose. The 48 seedlings of A. auriculiformis were irrigated twice a week until the beginning of the rainy season. This initial work aimed to identify the relationships of insects and spiders on A. auriculiformis because it is an exotic species widely used in the recovery of degraded areas. For this reason, no control group was needed and all arthropods were evaluted.

2.3. Arthropod collection

Twelve leaves/plant/evaluation, from each of the 48 A. auriculiformis plants were sampled during 24 months from the age of six months, totaling 27,648 leaves during the experimental period. Insects were counted, between 7:00 and 11:00 A.M. on the abaxial and adaxial leaf sides from the apical, middle, and basal heights of the canopy in the north, south, east, and west orientations. Each sample consisted of 1,152 values of leaves from two leaf sides, three plant heights, four cardinal orientations, and 48 A. auriculiformis plants per replication where the arthropods were counted. The averages of arthropods per leaf and tree sides were used in the subsequent analysis to avoid pseudo-replication. The Arthropod specimens collected were stored in bottles with 70% alcohol, separated into morphospecies, and sent for identification.

2.4. Data analysis

The experimental design was in a completely randomized block (rows of trees, planting lines) with six replications, and eight plants each, totaling 48 A. auriculiformis plants. Data were submitted to simple regression analysis at P<0.05 to verify the correlations between tending ants with phytophagous Hemiptera and predators. The average data were the numbers of arthropods on the leaf faces per tree. Data were submitted to second-degree regression analysis or principal components (PCR), when linear (p-value < 0.05) to verify the interactions between groups of arthropods. The criteria to selecting the simple equations were: data distribution in the figures (linear or quadratic response) (i), the parameters used in these regressions were the most significant p-value <0.05 (ii), and F of the analysis of variance of these regressions (iii), and the coefficient of determination of these equations (R²) (iv). The PCR model based on a covariance matrix uses principal component analysis to obtain the regression. This reduces the dimensions of the regression, excluding those that contribute to collinearity, that is, linear relationships between independent variables (Bair et al., 2006). The parameters used in these equations were all significant according to the selection of variables by applying the “Stepwise” method (p-value <0.05). Arthropod interactions and distribution were defined by the Chi-square test using BioDiversity © Professional, Version 2 (Krebs, 1998) software. Abundance was calculated by group of sampled insects and treatments (lower, middle and upper thirds) using the aforementioned program. Abundance was the total number of individuals and species (Begon et al., 2007), respectively, per plant and the data obtained submitted to a non-parametric statistical hypothesis with the Wilcoxon signed rank test (p-value <0.05 (Wilcoxon, 1945) using Statistical and Genetic Analysis (SAEG Program, version 9.1 (UFV, 2007) (Provider: “Universidade Federal de Viçosa”, Brazil).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Correlations between tending ants and phytophagous Hemiptera

Correlations between numbers of tending ants and Aethalion reticulatum L. (Hemiptera: Aethalionidae), Aleyrodidae (Hemiptera), Brachymyrmex sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Cephalotes sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and phytophagous Hemiptera were positive and that of tending ants with Sternorrhyncha predators negative on A. auriculiformis saplings (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Relations between phytophagous Hemiptera with ants (A), Sternorrhyncha predators with ants (B), Aethalium reticulatum with Brachymyrmex sp. (C) and Aleyrodidae with Cephalotes sp. (D) on Acacia auriculiformis sapling.

3.2. Insect distribution patterns on Acacia auriculiformis saplings

The distribution patterns of the Coleoptera phytophagous [Cerotoma sp., Parasyphraea sp. and Stereoma anchoralis Lacord (Chrysomelidae)], Diptera [Euxesta sp. (Ulidiidae)], Hemiptera [Achilidae, Aethalion reticulatum L. (Aethalionidae), Aleyrodidae, Balclutha hebe Kirkaldy and Erythrogonia sexguttata Fabricius (Cicadellidae), Membracidae and Pachycoridae (Scutelleridae) Scopoli (Scutelleridae) Pachycoridae, pollinators [Apis mellifera L. and Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae)], and natural enemy spiders (Araneae and Oxyopidae), Diptera (Dolichopodidae), Hemiptera [Podisus sp. (Pentatomidae)] and Hymenoptera [Brachymyrmex sp., Camponotus sp., Cephalotes sp., Ectatomma sp., Pheidole sp., and Pseudomyrmex termitarius Smith (Formicidae), and Polybia sp. (Vespidae)] were aggregated (P < 0.05) on the A. auriculiformis leaves (Table 1).

Table 1
Random (Ra), regular (Re) and aggregated (Ag) distribution pattern (D) of arthropods on Acacia auriculiformis (Fabales: Fabaceae) leaves in a severely degraded area of the Instituto de Ciências Agrárias of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

Order: Family	Genus: Species	Chi-square
		Var	Med	Chi	P	D
Araneae: Anyphaenidae	Teudis sp.	0.09	0.07	106.0	0.04	Ra
Oxyopidae		0.14	0.10	118.0	0.01	Ag
Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae	Cerotoma sp.	0.14	0.10	118.0	0.01	Ag
	Parasyphraea sp.	0.52	0.24	181.6	0.00	Ag
	Stereoma anchoralis	1.28	0.58	182.4	0.00	Ag
Diptera: Dolichopodidae		0.71	0.51	115.2	0.01	Ag
Ulidiidae	Euxesta sp.	0.07	0.05	122.0	0.00	Ag
Hemiptera: Achilidae		0.05	0.02	166.0	0.00	Ag
Aethalionidae	A. reticulatum	32.28	1.48	829.9	0.00	Ag
Aleyrodidae		3.93	0.39	1814.8	0.00	Ag
Cicadellidae	Balclutha hebe	0.52	0.23	188.8	0.00	Ag
	E. sexguttata	0.07	0.05	122.0	0.00	Ag
Membracidae		1.55	0.44	292.2	0.00	Ag
Pentatomidae	Podisus sp.	0.06	0.04	137.0	0.00	Ag
Scutelleridae	Pachycoris torridus	0.21	0.13	134.1	0.00	Ag
Hymenoptera: Apidae	Apis mellifera	0.27	0.14	156.0	0.00	Ag
	T. angustula	1.14	0.45	209.6	0.00	Ag
Formicidae	Brachymyrmex sp.	66.80	2.57	2156.2	0.00	Ag
	Camponotus sp.	7.57	1.82	345.0	0.00	Ag
	Cephalotes sp.	0.48	0.11	373.7	0.00	Ag
	Ectatomma sp.	0.96	0.37	215.6	0.00	Ag
	Pheidole sp.	5.30	1.63	269.5	0.00	Ag
	P. termitarius	1.59	0.63	208.5	0.00	Ag
Vespidae	Polybia sp.	0.40	0.29	116.0	0.01	Ag
Orthoptera: Proscopiidae	Cephalocoema sp.	0.09	0.07	106.0	0.04	Ra
Romaleidae	Tropidacris collaris	0.69	0.48	119.6	0.01	Ag

• A. reticulatum= Aethalion reticulatum, E. sexguttata= Erythrogonia sexguttata, T. angustula= Tetragonisca angustula, P. termitarius= Pseudomyrmex termitarius, Med= Mediana, Var.= variance. fd= 83.

The distribution of phytophagous Orthoptera [Cephalocoema sp. (Proscopiidae)] and natural enemies [Araneae and Teudis sp. (Anyphaenidae)] was random (P < 0.05) on the A. auriculiformis leaves (Table 1).

3.3. Most abundant arthropods on Acacia auriculiformis sapling

The numbers of individuals of the phytophagous insects S. anchoralis and A. reticulatum; the native stingless bees T. angustula; and the natural enemies Brachymyrmex sp. and Dolichopodidae were the highest on A. auriculiformis leaves (Table 2).

Table 2
Aggregated (Ag), random (Ra) or regular (Re) distribution of arthropods on Acacia auriculiformis (Fabales: Fabaceae) sapling.

Order:	Family	Genus: Species		Chi-square
				Var.	Med	Chi	P	D
Araneae: Araneidae				0.26	0.25	87.0	0.36	Ra
Oxyopidae		Oxyopes salticus		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Salticidae		Aphirape uncifera		0.15	0.14	86.0	0.39	Ra
		Uspachus sp.		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Sparassidae		Quemedice sp.		0.04	0.04	81.0	0.54	Ra
Tetragnathidae		Leucauge sp.		0.04	0.04	81.0	0.54	Ra
Thomisidae		Tmarus sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Coleoptera: Cantharidae		Cantharis sp.		0.05	0.05	80.0	0.57	Ra
Cerambycidae				0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Chrysomelidae		Alagoasa sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
		Charidotis sp.		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
		Diabrotica speciosa		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
		Disonycha brasiliensis		0.12	0.11	93.7	0.20	Ra
		Eumolpus sp.		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
		Wanderbiltiana sp.		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Coccinellidae		Cycloneda sanguinea		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Curculionidae		Cratosomus sp.		0.05	0.05	80.0	0.57	Ra
		Lordops sp.		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
		Naupactus sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Tenebrionidae				0.04	0.04	81.0	0.54	Ra
Diptera: Syrphidae		Syrphus sp.		0.04	0.04	81.0	0.54	Ra
Hemiptera: Cicadellidae		Acrogonia sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Cicadidae		Quesada gigas		0.10	0.08	101.0	0.09	Ra
Coreidae		Leptoglossus sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Fulgoridae				0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Membracidae		Membracis sp.		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Nogodinidae				0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Pentatomidae				0.05	0.05	80.0	0.57	Ra
Hymenoptera: Apidae		Trigona spinipes		0.01	0.01	83.0	0.48	Ra
Lepidoptera:				0.327	0.29	95.0	0.17	Ra
Mantodea: Mantidae		Mantis religiosa		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Neuroptera: Chrysopidae		Chrysoperla sp.		0.08	0.08	77.0	0.67	Ra
Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae		P. phyllinum		0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra
Phasmatodea: Phasmatidae				0.02	0.02	82.0	0.51	Ra

• Var.= variance. fd = 83. P.= Phibalosoma.

4. Discussion

4.1. Correlations between tending ants and phytophagous Hemiptera

The positive correlation between tending ants and Hemiptera species was expected, as a trophobiotic interaction between these groups is one of the main mechanisms regulating the overabundance of ants in terrestrial ecosystems (Gomes et al., 2023). Sugary substances, excreted by Hemiptera species, are used as food by ants and they protect these insects against natural enemies (e.g., parasitoids) (Guerra et al., 2011; Moura and Carvalho, 2021). These substances are named honeydew (Blüthgen et al., 2000; Moura and Carvalho, 2021) as a food resource from Homoptera species throughout the year and rich in nutrients such as amino acids from symbiotic bacteria in their digestive tracts (Blüthgen et al., 2000). Ants of different genera feeding on nectaries are usually smaller than those associated with Homoptera species (Blüthgen et al., 2000). Furthermore, the distribution of nectaries throughout the plant difficulty their monopolization (Blüthgen et al., 2000) favoring ant abundance (Blüthgen et al., 2000). The finding of Brachymyrmex and Pheidole sp. and ants of other genera, such as Paratrechina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (Blüthgen et al., 2000) and Cephalotes visiting these structures is similar to that reported in Brazilian savannas (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010). Aggregate distribution pattern of most of the sampled groups is common among herbivorous insects, as a survival strategy and reflected in other groups, including ants and predators (Agrawal et al., 2006). The type of reproduction favors the aggregate pattern in Diptera (Brunel and Rull, 2010), but this is poorly known for species of the order Hymenoptera on individual trees (Guerra et al., 2011). The random distribution of Teudis sp. and Cephalocoema is related to the mutualism between these insects.

The positive correlation between Brachymyrmex sp. and A. reticulatum differs from that of species of the first genus generally associated with other insects such as the leafhopper Dalbulus quinquenotatus DeLong and Nault (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in shaded environments (Moya-Raygoza, 2005; Moya-Raygoza and Martinez, 2014), or disturbed by fire (Moya-Raygoza and Larsen, 2014). Associations of A. reticulatum with Bauhinia forficata (Fabales: Fabaceae) and, mainly, with ants of the genus Camponotus (Baronio et al., 2014), stingless bees such as Trigona branneri Cockerel (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (Baronio et al., 2014) and wasps such as Synoeca septentrionalis Richards (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) on Piper aduncum Linné (Piperales: Piperaceae) (Ramoni-Perazzi et al., 2006) and Polistes erythrocephalus on a Solanaceae plant in Peru (MacCarroll and Reeves, 2004) have been reported. The association of Brachymyrmex ants with extrafloral nectaries is similar to that reported for individuals of this genus among the most abundant ones in the warm season in mangroves in these structures of Hibiscus pernambucensis Arruda (Malvales: Malvaceae) (Cogni and Freitas, 2002). Brachymyrmex obscurior Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) has been reported associated with extrafloral nectaries of Acacia pennatula (Schlencht and Cham) Benth (Fabales: Fabaceae) but this ant did not protect the plant against the non-myrmecophilous leafhopper Sibovia sp. (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), the only herbivore observed on it (Moya-Raygoza, 2005). On the other hand, Brachymyrmex minutus Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), associated with nectaries of Pleopeltis crassinervata (T. Moore) (Polypodiales: Polypodiaceae), protected this plant against larva herbivory (Koptur et al., 2013). Damage to plant leaves by herbivores with the presence of Cephalotes pusillus (Klug) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in extrafloral nectaries in Brazilian savannah were 6% lower (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010). The mutualism between Cephalotes sp. and Aleyrodidae explains their positive correlation with this ant being attracted by the honeydew produced by these phytophagous Hemiptera in aggregations and they protect them (Blüthgen et al., 2000). On the other hand, the protection of this plant, by these organisms, has been questioned (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010) because their jawn are small and its aggressiveness low, although some species can be more aggressive (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010). This increases the need of studying the behavior of each species per genus before generalizing the defensive behavior of the group (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010). Species of the genus Cephalotes cared Eurystethus microlobatus Ruckes (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) (Guerra et al., 2011) and those of the subfamilies Pseudococcidae: Pseudococcinae and Coccinae: Myzolecanii share symbiotic bacteria (Pringle and Moreau, 2017). Aleyrodidae were associated with Brachymyrmex and other ants on Croton floribundus Spreng. (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae) in a semideciduous forest in southeastern Brazil (Queiroz and Oliveira, 2001) and with Crematogaster sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in French Guiana, protecting this insect against pathogenic fungi and natural enemies (Belin-Depoux and Bastien, 2002). The negative correlation between ants and Sternorrhyncha predators is due to tending ants protecting this plant (Lima et al., 2024), but this varies between species (Byk and Del-Claro, 2010). Brachymyrmex is generally more associated with plant defense against phytophagous (Moya-Raygoza, 2005), but trophobiotic interactions can decrease the number of Sternorrhyncha predators (Leite et al., 2016; Lima et al., 2024). This may reduce the biological control by Hemiptera (Karami-Jamour et al., 2018) as found in pine and coniferous and mixed forests- cereal steppes and aspen birch woods (Novgorodova, 2015) and Cucumis sativus L. cv. ‘Superdominus’ (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) (Karami-Jamour et al., 2018). However, damage by Hemiptera on A. auriculiformis was higher on young plants, due to sap suction by these insects (Hegde et al., 2013). The choice of host plants by Hemiptera varies with food availability due to the sessile habits of these insects during the first instar, obtaining shelter against sun exposure, which generally depend on the plant structure (Moura and Carvalho, 2021). Ant associations with Membracidae are more specialized (Blüthgen et al., 2000) and the former choose their trophobiotic partners according to nutritional need by behavioral patterns or with host tree characteristics (Blüthgen et al., 2000).

4.2. Insect distribution patterns on Acacia auriculiformis saplings

The aggregated distribution pattern of Coleoptera and insects of the Chrysomelidae family, largely phytophagous mostly addresses larger spatial scales to establish more adequate sampling programs for their management (Reay-Jones, 2012; Silva et al., 2020). Aggregations of herbivorous insects are generally associated with food availability, directly affecting their abundance (Nogueira-de-Sá and Vasconcellos-Neto, 2003) and that of their predators (Agrawal et al., 2006). The host plant choice mechanisms are effective and phytophagous, generally, prefer those with evolutionary proximity (Valencia-Cuevas and Tovar-Sánchez, 2015). The distribution pattern of individuals from the Ulidiidae and Dolichopodidae (Diptera) families is aggregated with most of those from the first family being generalists and saprophagous (Brunel and Rull, 2010) and some defending the territory for mating and serving as an arena between males promoting aggregations (Brunel and Rull, 2010). Dolichopodidae are phytophagous and their larvae such as Thrypticus sagittatus Bickel and Hernandez (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) feed on scraped vascular bundles of Eichhornia crassipes Martius Solms-Laubach (Commelinales: Pontederiaceae) plants (Hernández, 2008). Most of its adult prey on a small number of soft-bodied arthropods such as Acari, Collembola, Homoptera and Thysanoptera (Hernández, 2008). Therefore, eating habits and reproductive behavior should be the main mechanisms, causing the aggregate pattern for groups of these insects and contributing to biological control (Hernández, 2008). The aggregate pattern in Hemiptera is common and the type of approach used in the study and the spatial scale vary, but most works carried out with Aleyrodidae, Aphidae, Cicadellidae and Pentatomidae aimed to improve sampling methods and, subsequently, the management of these insects (Riolo et al., 2014). Parental or ant care and reproductive behavior favor aggregations (Miranda, 2016) as the parasitism rate in Alchisme thick Fairmaire (Hemiptera: Membracidae) being, negatively correlated with the number of their aggregated females (Camacho et al., 2014). Furthermore, ant care affected the distribution of Membracidae in host plant patches or in individual ones (Cocroft, 2003). The factors that predispose the aggregated distribution of Hymenoptera on individual plants is poorly known. Most works emphasize the spatial distribution of their nests and the aggregate pattern mainly attributed to the availability of resources as in Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (Baum et al., 2005), Vespa velutina Lepeletier (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) (Carvalho et al., 2020), Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Formicidae: Ectatomminae) and Pheidole fallax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (Dominguez-Haydar et al., 2018). Aggregation in stingless bees was attributed to mating in lek characteristic of Trigona spinipes F. (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae), Tetragona clavipes (F.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae), and Tetragonisca angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae) (Dos Santos et al., 2015). Resource recruitment explained the aggregation of Vespula germanica Fabricius (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) around the food source (Lozada et al., 2016). Distribution patterns varied between castes of Pheidole pallidula Nylander (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) ants with protection, resource availability and chemical signals left by nestmates being the main reasons for this aggregate pattern (Sempo et al., 2006). The tending behavior in A. reticulatum and Aleyrodidae explains the aggregated pattern of Brachymyrmex sp. and Cephalotes sp. On the other hand, this pattern of T. collaris and the random pattern of Cephalocoema sp. (Orthoptera) differ in this parameter, with some of its species aggregating due to adaptation to reduce or avoid predation and, eventually, improve the searching for resources (Dkhili et al., 2017). The population pattern of Locusta migratoria tibetensis Chen (Orthoptera: Acrididae) was aggregated due to food availability, reproductive traits, and anti-predator behavior (Jyoti et al., 2020). Schistocerca gregaria Forskål (Orthoptera: Acrididae) choose taller trees to rest at night, characterizing aggregation (Maeno and Ebbe, 2018). The aggregate pattern in spiders, such as Oxyopes molarius L. Koch (Aranae: Oxyopidae), on plant tops is due to search for food or competition between species, as with Nabis kinbergii Reuter bedbugs (Hemiptera: Nabidae) (Whitehouse et al., 2011). However, the random pattern of Teudis sp. and other species is due to the interspecific dispute for the same resource (Perkins et al., 2007). Aranophagy records in the Anyphaenidae family may be another behavioral factor influencing the distribution pattern of these Arthropods (Perkins et al., 2007).

4.3. Most abundant arthropods on Acacia auriculiformis sapling

The greatest abundance of the herbivores S. anchoralis, A. reticulatum, the native bee T. angustula and the predators Brachymyrmex sp. and Dolichopodidae on A. auriculiformis sapling confirm the presence of these arthropods in the savanna as reported on A. mangium in this biome (Silva et al., 2020). Interactions between Hemiptera and ants are due to the relationship between the groups of the latter caring for and protecting Hemiptera and receiving honeydew, a sugary substance secreted by species of that order (Blüthgen et al., 2000). The native bee T. angustula has been reported as abundant in the savanna biome on different plant species used in the recovery of degraded areas such as Leucaena leucocephala Lam. de Wit (Fabales: Fabaceae) (Damascena et al., 2017). This should be favored by the small size and high dispersal capacity of this insect by the wind in searching for food such as nectar (Damascena et al., 2017). Dolichopodidae species are widely distributed in the world and their abundance may be mainly related to the different feeding habits of their larvae, phytophagous and their adults preying on small soft-bodied arthropods (Hernández, 2008).

Acacia auriculiformis is important in soil recovery and for populations of different groups such as Coleoptera phytophagous, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera and Aranae. Ants of the genera Brachymyrmex and Cephalotes were positively correlated with A. reticulatum and Aleyrodidae, respectively, on the crown of this plant. The reduction in the number of Sternorrhyncha predators by ants supports the hypothesis that the latter protect the former against predators. The relationship between these groups is complex and shows the contribution of A. auriculiformis, even exotic, to local diversity. Structures such as extrafloral nectaries in this plant are important for the Arthropoda fauna. The distribution pattern of these organisms on A. auriculiformis plants was mainly aggregated, except for Teudis sp. and Cephalocoema with a random pattern.

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the Brazilian agencies “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)”, “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)”, and “Programa Cooperativo sobre Proteção Florestal (PROTEF) do Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (IPEF)”. We would like to thank the taxonomists Dr. Antônio Domingos Brescovit (Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brasil) (Arachnida), Dr. Ayr de Moura Bello (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (Coleoptera), Dr. Carlos Matrangolo (UNIMONTES, Minas Gerais, Brasil) (Formicidae), Dr. Ivan Cardoso Nascimento (EMBRAPA-ILHÉUS, Bahia, Brasil) (Formicidae), Dr. Luci Boa Nova Coelho (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (Cicadellidae) and Dr. Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira (Hemiptera) (Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil). The voucher numbers are IBSP 36921–36924 (Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brasil) and for insects 1595/02 and 1597/02 (CDZOO, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Paraná, Brasil).

Nova Coelho (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) (Cicadellidae) and Dr. Paulo Sérgio Fiuza Ferreira (Hemiptera) (Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brasil). The voucher numbers are Instituto Butantan IBSP 36921–36924 (, São Paulo, Brasil) and for insects CDZOO 1595/02 and 1597/02 (, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Paraná, Brasil).

References

• AGRAWAL, A.A., LAU, J.A. and HAMBÄCK, P.A., 2006. Community heterogeneity and the evolution of interactions between plants and insect herbivores. The Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 349-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/511529 PMid:17240728.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/511529
• ALMEIDA, C.A.C., GONÇALVES, F.S., RODRIGUES, M.B., SANTOS, J.M. and BREDA, M.O., 2021. Food preference of Thyrinteina arnobia (Stoll, 1782) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) on native and exotic hosts. Revista Árvore, vol. 45, pp. e4511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820210000011
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820210000011
• ALVARES, C.A., STAPE, J.L., SENTELHAS, P.C., MORAES GONÇALVES, J.L. and SPAROVEK, G., 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 711-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
• BAIR, E., HASTIE, T., PAUL, D. and TIBSHIRANI, R., 2006. Prediction by supervised principal components. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 101, no. 473, pp. 119-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000628
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000628
• BALIEIRO, F. C., COSTA, C.A., OLIVEIRA, R.B., OLIVEIRA, R., DONAGEMMA, G.K., ANDRADE, A.G. and CAPECHE, C.L., 2018. Carbon stocks in mined area reclaimed y leguminous trees and sludge. Revista Árvore, vol. 41, pp. e410610.
• BARONIO, G., PIRES, A. and AOKI, C., 2014. Trigona branneri (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a collector of honeydew from Aethalion reticulatum (Hemiptera: Aethalionidae) on Bauhinia forficata (Fabaceae: Caesalpinoideae) in a Brazilian savanna. Sociobiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 407-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i2.603
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v59i2.603
• BAUM, K.A., RUBINK, W.L., PINTO, M.A. and COULSON, R.N., 2005. Spatial and temporal distribution and nest site characteristics of feral honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies in a coastal prairie landscape. Environmental Entomology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 610-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.3.610
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.3.610
• BEGON, M., TOWNSEND, C.R. and HARPER, J.L., 2007. Ecologia: de indivíduos a ecossistemas 4th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
• BELIN-DEPOUX, M. and BASTIEN, D., 2002. Regards sur la myrmécophilie en Guyane Française. Les dispositifs d’absorption de Maieta guianensis et la triple association Philoclendron-fourmis-Aleurodes. Acta Botanica Gallica, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 299-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2002.10515964
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2002.10515964
• BLÜTHGEN, N., VERHAAGH, M., GOITÍA, W., JAFFÉ, K., MORAWETZ, W. and BARTHLOTT, W., 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 229-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420000449 PMid:24595834.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420000449
• BRUNEL, O. and RULL, J., 2010. Natural history and mating behavior of Pseudodyscrasis scutellaris, a fly species (Ulidiidae) associated with agave in Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 430-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN08164
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN08164
• BYK, J. and DEL-CLARO, K., 2010. Nectar- and pollen-gathering Cephalotes ants provide no protection against herbivory: A new manipulative experiment to test ant protective capabilities. Acta Ethologica, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-010-0071-8
• CAMACHO, L., KEIL, C. and DANGLES, O., 2014. Factors influencing egg parasitism in sub-social insects: insights from the treehopper Alchisme grossa (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Membracidae). Ecological Entomology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 58-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12060
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/een.12060
• CARVALHO, J.Ã., HIPÓLITO, D., SANTARÉM, F., MARTINS, R., GOMES, A., CARMO, P., RODRIGUES, R., GROSSO-SILVA, J. and FONSECA, C., 2020. Patterns of Vespa velutina invasion in Portugal using crowdsourced data. Insect Conservation and Diversity, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 501-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/icad.12418
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/icad.12418
• COCROFT, R.B., 2003. The social environment of an aggregating, ant-attended treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae: Vanduzea arquata). Journal of Insect Behavior, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 79-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022801429033
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022801429033
• COGNI, R. and FREITAS, A.V.L., 2002. The ant assemblage visiting extrafloral nectaries of Hibiscus pernambucensis (Malvaceae) in a mangrove forest in Southeast Brazil (Hymenoptera: formicidae). Sociobiology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 373-383.
• DAMASCENA, J.G., LEITE, G.L.D., SILVA, F.W.S., SOARES, M.A., GUANABENS, R.E.M., SAMPAIO, R.A. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2017. Spatial distribution of phytophagous insects, natural enemies, and pollinators on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) trees in the Cerrado. The Florida Entomologist, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 558-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311
• DKHILI, J., BERGER, U., IDRISSI HASSANI, L.M., GHAOUT, S., PETERS, R. and PIOU, C., 2017. Self-organized spatial structures of locust groups emerging from local interaction. Ecological Modelling, vol. 361, pp. 26-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.020
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.07.020
• DOMINGUEZ-HAYDAR, Y., GUTIERREZ-RAPALINO, B. and JIMÉNEZ, J.J., 2018. Density and spatial distribution of nests of Ectatomma ruidum and Pheidole fallax (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), as response to the recovery of coal mine areas. Sociobiology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 415-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2880
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v65i3.2880
• GOMES, G.N., LEITE, G.L.D., SOARES, M.A., GUANÃBENS, R.E.M., LEMES, P.G. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2023. Arthropod fauna on the abaxial and adaxial surfaces of Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) leaves. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 83, pp. e245536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.245536
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.245536
• GUERRA, T.J., CAMAROTA, F., CASTRO, F.S., SCHWERTNER, C.F. and GRAZIA, J., 2011. Trophobiosis between ants and Eurystethus microlobatus Ruckes 1966 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) a cryptic, gregarious and subsocial stinkbug. Journal of Natural History, vol. 45, no. 17-18, pp. 1101-1117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.552800
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2011.552800
• HEGDE, M., PALANISAMY, K. and YI, J.S., 2013. Acacia mangium Willd: a fast growing tree for tropical plantation. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2013.29.1.1
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2013.29.1.1
• HERNÁNDEZ, M.C., 2008. Biology of Thrypticus truncatus and Thrypticus sagittatus (Diptera: Dolichopodidae), petiole miners of water hyacinth, in Argentina, with morphological descriptions of larvae and pupae. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1041-1049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1041
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746-101.6.1041
• HUNG, T.T., DOYLE, R., EYLES, A. and MOHAMMED, C., 2017. Comparison of soil properties under tropical Acacia hybrid plantation and shifting cultivation land use in northern Vietnam. Southern Forests, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1225185
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1225185
• JYOTI, B., SHALI, Y., ZEHUA, Z., XIAOHO, Y., JIANG, D., YALING, Z., CUILING, W., YANG, L., XUEPING, L., WENFENG, W., HASSAN, M.F. and CAN, L., 2020. Population dynamics and life history of the Locusta migratoria tibetensis Chen in Lhasa river. Journal of Zoology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 927-936.
• KARAMI-JAMOUR, T., MIRMOAYEDI, A., ZAMANI, A. and KHAJEHZADEH, Y., 2018. The impact of ant attendance on protecting Aphis gossypii against two aphidophagous predators and it’s role on the intraguild predation between them. Journal of Insect Behavior, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 222-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9670-4
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10905-018-9670-4
• KOPTUR, S., PALACIOS-RIOS, M., DÍAZ-CASTELAZO, C., MACKAY, W.P. and RICO-GRAY, V., 2013. Nectar secretion on fern fronds associated with lower levels of herbivore damage: field experiments with a widespread epiphyte of Mexican cloud forest remnants. Annals of Botany, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 1277-1283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct063 PMid:23609022.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct063
• KREBS, C.J., 1998 [accessed 04 Feb 2022]. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis - Biodiversity Pro Versão 2 [software]. Available from: http://biodiversity-pro.software.informer.com
  » http://biodiversity-pro.software.informer.com
• LEITE, G.L.D., VELOSO, R.V.D.S., ZANUNCIO, J.C., ALONSO, J., FERREIRA, P.S.F., ALMEIDA, C.I.M., FERNANDES, G.W. and SERRÃO, J.E., 2016. Diversity of Hemiptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) and their natural enemies on Caryocar brasiliense (Malpighiales: Caryocaraceae) trees in the Brazilian Cerrado. The Florida Entomologist, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 239-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0213
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0213
• LIMA, J.S., LEITE, G.L.D., GUANABENS, P.F.S., SOARES, M.A., SILVA, J.L., MOTA, M.V.S., LEMES, P.G. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2024. Insects and spiders on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) saplings as bioindicators for the recovery of tropical degraded areas. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 84, pp. e252088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.252088 PMid:34755814.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.252088
• LOZADA, M., D'ADAMO, P., BUTELER, M. and KUPERMAN, M.N., 2016. Social learning in Vespula germanica wasps: do they use collective foraging strategies? PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. e0152080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152080 PMid:26990864.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152080
• MACCARROLL, M.A. and REEVES, W.K., 2004. Attendance of aetalion reticulatum (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae) by Polistes erythrocephalus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in Peru. Entomological News, vol. 115, pp. 52-53.
• MAENO, K.O. and EBBE, M.A.O.B., 2018. Aggregation site choice by gregarious nymphs of the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria, in the Sahara Desert of Mauritania. Insects, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9030099 PMid:30104503.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects9030099
• MANHÃES, C.M.C., GAMA-RODRIGUES, E.F., SILVA MOÇO, M.K. and GAMA-RODRIGUES, A.C., 2013. Meso- and macrofauna in the soil and litter of leguminous trees in a degraded pasture in Brazil. Agroforestry Systems, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 993-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9614-0
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9614-0
• MIRANDA, X., 2016. Egg-guarding of the treehopper Ennya chrysura (Hemiptera : Membracidae): female aggregations, egg parasitism, and a possible substrate-borne alarm signal. Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1209-1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v64i3.19379 PMid:29462538.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v64i3.19379
• MOIR, M.L., RENTON, M., HOFFMANN, B.D., LENG, M.C. and LACH, L., 2018. Development and testing of a standardized method to estimate honeydew production. PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. e0201845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201845 PMid:30110359.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201845
• MONTEIRO, G.F., MACEDO-REIS, L.E., DÁTTILO, W., FERNANDES, G.W., SIQUEIRA DE CASTRO, F. and NEVES, F.S., 2020. Ecological interactions among insect herbivores, ants and the host plant Baccharis dracunculifolia in a Brazilian mountain ecosystem. Austral Ecology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 158-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aec.12839
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aec.12839
• MOTA FILHO, T.M.M., STEFANELLI, L.E.P., CAMARGO, R.S., MATOS, C.A.O. and FORTI, L.C., 2021. Biological control in leaf-cutting ants, Atta sexdens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), using pathogenic fungi. Revista Árvore, vol. 45, pp. e4516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820210000016
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-908820210000016
• MOTA, M.V.S., DEMOLIN-LEITE, G.L., GUANABENS, P.F.S., TEIXEIRA, G.L., SOARES, M.A., SILVA, J.L., SAMPAIO, R.A. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2023. Chewing insects, pollinators, and predators on Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Ex Beth (Fabales: Fabaceae) plants fertilized with dehydrated sewage sludge. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 83, pp. e248305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.248305 PMid:34669795.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.248305
• MOURA, R.R. and CARVALHO, R.L., 2021. A novel trophobiotic interaction between a Neotropical stink bug and an ant species: insights into potential benefits to the host plant. Behavioural Processes, vol. 182, pp. 104296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104296 PMid:33338575.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104296
• MOYA-RAYGOZA, G. and LARSEN, K.J., 2014. Response of ants to the leafhopper Dalbulus quinquenotatus DeLong and Nault (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) and extrafloral nectaries following fire. Sociobiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 136-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.136-144
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v61i2.136-144
• MOYA-RAYGOZA, G. and MARTINEZ, A.V., 2014. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and trophobiont leafhopper nymphs (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) become more abundant in shaded conditions: implications for mutualism. The Florida Entomologist, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 1378-1385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0412
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0412
• MOYA-RAYGOZA, G., 2005. Relationships between the ant Brachymyrmex obscurior (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) and Acacia pennatula (Fabaceae). Insectes Sociaux, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 105-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-004-0777-6
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-004-0777-6
• NGHIEM, C.Q., HARWOOD, C.E., HARBARD, J.L., GRIFFIN, A.R., HA, T.H. and KOUTOULIS, A., 2011. Floral phenology and morphology of colchicine-induced tetraploid Acacia mangium compared with diploid A. mangium and A. muriculiformis: implications for interploidy pollination. Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 582-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT11130
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT11130
• NOGUEIRA-DE-SÁ, F. and VASCONCELLOS-NETO, J., 2003. Host plant utilization and population abundance of three tropical species of Cassidinae (Coleoptera: chrysomelidae). Journal of Natural History, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 681-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930110096753
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930110096753
• NOVGORODOVA, T.A., 2015. Organization of honeydew collection by foragers of different species of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): effect of colony size and species specificity. European Journal of Entomology, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 688-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.077
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.077
• OLIVEIRA, F.M.P., CÂMARA, T., DURVAL, J.I.F., OLIVEIRA, C.L.S., ARNAN, X., ANDERSEN, A.N., RIBEIRO, E.M.S. and LEAL, I.R., 2021. Plant protection services mediated by extrafloral nectaries decline with aridity but are not influenced by chronic anthropogenic disturbance in Brazilian Caatinga. Journal of Ecology, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 260-272.
• PERKINS, T.A., RIECHERT, S.E. and JONES, T.C., 2007. Interactions between the social spider Anelosimus studiosus (Araneae, Theridiidae) and foreign spiders that frequent its nests. The Journal of Arachnology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 143-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/T06-43.1
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/T06-43.1
• PIRES, L.P. and DEL-CLARO, K., 2014. Variation in the outcomes of an ant-plant system: fire and leaf fungus infection reduce benefits to plants with extrafloral nectaries. Journal of Insect Science, vol. 14, pp. 84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.014.84 PMid:25368040.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1673/031.014.84
• PRICE, P.W., ABRAHAMSON, W.G., HUNTER, M.D. and MELIKA, G., 2004. Using gall wasps on oaks to test broad ecological concepts. Conservation Biology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1405-1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00547.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00547.x
• PRINGLE, E.G. and MOREAU, C.S., 2017. Community analysis of microbial sharing and specialization in a Costa Rican ant – plant – hemipteran symbiosis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, vol. 284, no. 1850, pp. 20162770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2770
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2770
• QUEIROZ, J.M. and OLIVEIRA, P.S., 2001. Tending ants protect honeydew-producing whiteflies (Homoptera: aleyrodidae). Environmental Entomology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 295-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.2.295
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.2.295
• RAMONI-PERAZZI, P., BIANCHI-PÉREZ, G. and BIANCHI-BALLESTEROS, G., 2006. Primer registro de asociación entre Aetalion reticulatum (Linné) (Hemiptera: Aetalionidae) y Synoeca septentrionalis Richards (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomotrópica, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 129-132.
• RANA, V. and MAITI, S.K., 2018. Differential distribution of metals in tree tissues growing on reclaimed coal mine overburden dumps, Jharia coal field (India). Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 9745-9758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1254-5 PMid:29368202.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1254-5
• REAY-JONES, F.P.F., 2012. Spatial analysis of the cereal leaf beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in wheat. Environmental Entomology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1516-1526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN12103 PMid:23321100.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EN12103
• RIOLO, P., MINUZ, R.L., LANDI, L., NARDI, S., RICCI, E., RIGHI, M. and ISIDORO, N., 2014. Population dynamics and dispersal of Scaphoideus titanus from recently recorded infested areas in central-eastern Italy. Bulletin of Insectology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 99-107.
• RODRIGUES, T.R., FERNANDES, M.G., and SANTOS, H.R., 2010. Distribuição espacial de Aphis gossypii (Glover) (Hemiptera, Aphididae) e Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biótipo B (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae) em algodoeiro Bt e não-Bt Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 136-143.
• SANTOS, C.F., FERREIRA-CALIMAN, M.J., and NASCIMENTO, F.S., 2015. An alien in the group: eusocial male bees sharing nonspecific reproductive aggregations. Journal of Insect Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev107 PMid:26518220.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iev107
• SCHOWALTER, T.D., ZHANG, Y. and PROGAR, R.A., 2005. Canopy arthropod response to density and distribution of green trees retained after partial harvest. Ecological Applications, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1594-1603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-0634
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-0634
• SEMPO, G., DEPICKÈRE, S. and DETRAIN, C., 2006. Spatial organization in a dimorphic ant: caste specificity of clustering patterns and area marking. Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 642-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark011
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark011
• SILVA, J.L., DEMOLIN LEITE, G.L., SOUZA TAVARES, W., SOUZA SILVA, F.W., SAMPAIO, R.A., AZEVEDO, A.M., SERRÃO, J.E. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2020. Diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) and production of this plant with dehydrated sewage sludge in degraded area. Royal Society Open Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 191196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196 PMid:32257306.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196
• SILVA, L.F., SILVA, W.S., DEMOLIN-LEITE, G.L.D., SOARES, M.A., LEMES, P.G. and ZANUNCIO, J.C., 2023. Distribution pattern of arthropods on the leaf surfaces of Acacia auriculiformis saplings. Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasileira de Biologia, vol. 83, pp. e243651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.243651
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.243651
• TANG, G. and LI, K., 2014. Soil amelioration through afforestation and self-repair in a degraded valley-type savanna. Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 320, pp. 13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.018
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.02.018
• VALENCIA-CUEVAS, L. and TOVAR-SÁNCHEZ, E., 2015. Oak canopy arthropod communities: which factors shape its structure? Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 88, no. 15, pp. 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40693-015-0045-3
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40693-015-0045-3
• VILELA, A.A., TOREZAN-SILINGARDI, H.M. and DEL-CLARO, K., 2014. Conditional outcomes in ant-plant-herbivore interactions influenced by sequential flowering. Flora, vol. 209, no. 7, pp. 359-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.04.004
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.04.004
• WANG, X., LIU, J., SUN, Y., LI, K. and ZHANG, C., 2017. Sap flow characteristics of three afforestation species during the wet and dry seasons in a dry-hot valley in Southwest China. Journal of Forestry Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 51-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0276-4
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0276-4
• WHITEHOUSE, M.E.A., MANSFIELD, S., BARNETT, M.C. and BROUGHTON, K., 2011. From lynx spiders to cotton: behaviourally mediated predator effects over four trophic levels. Austral Ecology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 687-697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02204.x
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2010.02204.x
• WILCOXON, F., 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 80-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001968
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001968

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  03 June 2022
• Date of issue
  2024

History

• Received
  04 Feb 2022
• Accepted
  12 May 2022