Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the dimensional stability of a new facial molding technique using thermoplastic custom molding tray. METHODS: The designs established demarcation of facial anthropometrics landmarks, making linear measurements with a digital caliper. Facial molding was carried out using thermoplastic custom trays, constructing a facial plaster cast with the anthropometric landmarks already transferred by measuring the linear dimensions on the plaster cast and statistical analysis. RESULTS: All linear measurements in the palpebral and labial regions presented statistically significant distortions. Only one of the linear measurements from the orbital region did not demonstrate any significant distortion. The nasal region presented the least amount of distortion. CONCLUSIONS: Although statistically significant, distortions were due to the method of breathing and were considered to be clinically irrelevant. The reduction in the working time, the comfort provided to the patient and the dimensional accuracy of the plaster cast obtained by the facial molding technique using custom perforated molding tray suggest that this technique should be employed for making facial prostheses.
facial prosthesis; molding material; anthropometrics
-
1Ariani N, Visser A, van Oort RP, Kusdhany L, Rahardjo TBW, Krom BP et al. Current State of Craniofacial Prosthetic Rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont. 2013; 26:57-67.
-
2Veerareddy C, Nair C, Reddy R. Simplified technique for orbital prosthesis fabrication: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21: 561-8.
-
3Rommerdale EH. Maxillofacial technology. 1. , Part one. Introduction to facial impressions. Trends Tech Contemp Dent Lab. 1990; 7: 36-9.
-
4Lemon JC, Okay DJ, Powers JM, Martin JW, Chambers S. Facial moulage: The effect of a retarder on compressive strength and working and setting times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 276-81.
-
5Alsiyabi AS, Minsley GE. Facial moulage fabrication using a two-stage poly(vinyl siloxane) impression. J Prosthodont. 2006; 15: 195-7.
-
6Holberg C, Schwenzer K, Mahaini L, Rudzki-Janson I. Accuracy of facial plaster casts. Angle Orthod.ont. 2006; 76: 605-11.
-
7Siadat H, Mirfazaelian A. A handle for facial casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 323.
-
8Shaikh SR, Patil PG, Puri S. A modified technique for retention of orbital prosthesis. Ind J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 863-5.
-
9Ozcelick TB, Yilmaz B. Two-piece Impression Procedure for Implantretained Orbital Prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 27: 93-5.
-
10Al-Athel. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 9: 57-64.
-
11Littlefield TR, Cherney JC, Luisi JN, Beals SP, Kelly KM, Pomatto JK. Comparison of plaster casting with three-dimensional cranial imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42: 157-64.
-
12Holberg C, Schwenzer K, Mahaini L, Rudzki-Janson I. Accuracy of facial plaster casts. Angle Orthodont. 2006; 76: 605-11.
-
13Marafon PG, Mattos BS, Sabóia AC, Noritomi PY. Dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured orbital prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23: 271-6.
-
14Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994.
-
15Politec Importação e Comércio Ltda.. Produto – Placa termoplástica Aquaplast – Sammons Preston Rolyan [cited 2013 Apr] Available from:. Accessible from http://www.politecsaude.com.br [April 10, 2013]
-
16Sykes LM. Custom made ocular prostheses. A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 1-3.
-
17Rodrigues SB, Augusto CR, Leitune VC, Samuel SM, Collares FM. Influence of delayed pouring on irreversible hydrocolloid properties. Braz Oral Res. 2012; 26: 404-9.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
28 Oct 2013 -
Date of issue
Sept 2013
History
-
Received
05 Apr 2013 -
Accepted
31 July 2013