Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Effects of masticatory hypofunction on mandibular morphology, mineral density and basal bone area

Abstract

AIM: This experimental study investigated the association between masticatory hypofunction and mandibular morphological dimensions and internal bone characteristics. METHODS: Twentyfour 21-day-old male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups, according to the diet consistency. The control group (CG) was fed a solid diet (pellets) and the experimental group (EG) received a powdered diet during 50 days. All animals were euthanized and their mandibles removed and processed for histomorphometric analysis. A calibrated examiner performed linear and angular measurements (mandibular body length and height, mandibular lengths, ramus depth and height, mandibular base depth, mandibular head and gonial angle) on photographs, estimated bone density in the mandibular ramus region on digital radiographs and assessed the area of cortical and trabecular bone tissue in the second molar region, in 5-µm-thick serial cuts stained with Cason's Trichrome. Measurements for the study groups were compared using Mann-Whitney test (α=0.05). larvae to induce experimental candidiasis, and after 24 hours, the survival rate was assessed. RESULTS: some of the macroscopic dimensions evaluated on photographs were significantly smaller in EG compared to CG, specifically mandibular ramus height (10.77 mm vs. 11.11 mm, p=0.0375), mandibular body length (21.67 mm vs. 22.36 mm, p=0.0165) and height (4.24 mm vs. 4.54 mm, p=0.0016), as well as mandibular base depth (1.24 mm vs. 1.47 mm, p=0.0325). The relative mineral bone density was significantly decreased in EG (1.04) compared to CG (1.25), p<0.001. Rats in the EG also presented smaller trabecular and cortical bone area (2.36 mm²) than those in CG (3.16 mm²), p<0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above-mentioned measurements, it may be concluded that masticatory hypofunction induced by a powdered diet affected mandibular morphology and was associated with significantly reduced bone content.

mastication; diet; mandible; bone development


  • 1
    Shimizu Y, Ishida T, Hosomichi J, Kaneko S, Hatano K, Ono T. Soft diet causes greater alveolar osteopenia in the mandible than in the maxilla. Arch Oral Biol. 2013; 58: 907-11.
  • 2
    Mavropoulos A, Odman A, Ammann P, Kiliaridis S. Rehabilitation of masticatory function improves the alveolar bone architecture of the mandible in adult rats. Bone. 2010; 47: 687-92.
  • 3
    Kiliaridis S. Masticatory muscle function and craniofacial morphology. An experimental study in the growing rat fed a soft diet. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1986; 36: 1-55.
  • 4
    Maki K, Nishioka T, Shioiri E, Takahashi T, Kimura M. Effects of dietary consistency on the mandible of rats at the growth stage: computed X-ray densitometric and cephalometric analysis. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72: 468-75.
  • 5
    Tsai CY, Yang LY, Chen KT, Chiu WC. The influence of masticatory hypofunction on developing rat craniofacial structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39: 593-8.
  • 6
    Tsai CY, Shyr YM, Chiu WC, Lee CM. Bone changes in the mandible following botulinum neurotoxin injections. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33: 132-8.
  • 7
    Lanyon LE. Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36(Suppl 1): S56-61.
  • 8
    Turner CH, Pavalko FM. Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci. 1998; 3: 346-55.
  • 9
    Currey JD. Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984; 304: 509-18.
  • 10
    Rubin CT. Skeletal strain and the functional significance of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984; 36(Suppl 1): S11-8.
  • 11
    Hart A. Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ. 2001; 323: 391-3.
  • 12
    Changsiripun C, Yabushita T, Soma K. Masticatory function and maturation of the jaw-opening reflex. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79: 299-305.
  • 13
    Enomoto A, Watahiki J, Yamaguchi T, Irie T, Tachikawa T, Maki K. Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32: 66-70.
  • 14
    Patullo IM, Takayama L, Patullo RF, Jorgetti V, Pereira RM. Influence of ovariectomy and masticatory hypofunction on mandibular bone remodeling. Oral Dis. 2009; 15: 580-6.
  • 15
    Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S, Bresin A, Ammann P. Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats. Bone. 2004; 35: 191-7.
  • 16
    Kingsmill VJ, Boyde A, Davis GR, Howell PG, Rawlinson SC. Changes in bone mineral and matrix in response to a soft diet. J Dent Res. 2010; 89: 510-4.
  • 17
    Shimomoto Y, Chung CJ, Iwasaki-Hayashi Y, Muramoto T, Soma K. Effects of occlusal stimuli on alveolar/jaw bone formation. J Dent Res. 2007; 86: 47-51.
  • 18
    Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptation to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64: 175-88.
  • 19
    Chen J, Sorensen KP, Gupta T, Kilts T, Young M, Wadhwa S. Altered functional loading causes differential effects in the subchondral bone and condylar cartilage in the temporomandibular joint from young mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009; 17: 354-61.
  • 20
    Holmes MA, Ruff CB. Dietary effects on development of the human mandibular corpus. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011; 145: 615-28.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Oct 2013
  • Date of issue
    Sept 2013

History

  • Received
    03 July 2013
  • Accepted
    11 Sept 2013
Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - UNICAMP Avenida Limeira, 901, cep: 13414-903, Piracicaba - São Paulo / Brasil, Tel: +55 (19) 2106-5200 - Piracicaba - SP - Brazil
E-mail: brjorals@unicamp.br