Abdominal aortic aneurysm model in swine with bovine pericardium patch

Modelo de aneurisma de aorta abdominal em suínos com saco pericárdico bovino

Abstract

Background

Aneurysm repair using endovascular techniques has grown in importance as materials have improved. Studies of endovascular prostheses require experimental models that reproduce anatomic and pathophysiological characteristics of human aneurysms.

Objectives

To describe a porcine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Methods

This prospective cohort study used eleven Large White female pigs with a mean age of 12 weeks in two study phases. In phase I, the aneurysm was produced with a bovine pericardium patch by retroperitoneal surgery conducted under general anesthesia. In phase II, 15 days later, the animals underwent arteriography and were then euthanized before specimens were removed for histological analysis.

Results

Formation of parietal thrombus was observed in all animals. Microscopic analysis showed calcifications around thrombus in 82% of the animals. There was lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the graft and adjacent area, with fibrosis in nine animals. Three pigs had substantial myointimal thickening, and eight had microcalcifications. Mortality was zero, and there were no ruptures, ischemia, or surgery site infections.

Conclusions

This is a unique model, using inexpensive, biocompatible material. Bovine pericardium is easy for the surgeon to handle and has very similar characteristics to autologous tissue in terms of integration with the cell wall.

Keywords:
abdominal aortic aneurysm; aortic aneurysm; aneurysm

Resumo

Contexto

A correção de um aneurisma por meio de técnicas endovasculares tem ganhado importância com o aprimoramento dos materiais. O estudo das próteses endovasculares requer modelos experimentais que reproduzam as características anatômicas e fisiopatológicas dos aneurismas humanos.

Objetivos

Descrever um modelo suíno de aneurisma de aorta abdominal.

Métodos

Este estudo de coorte prospectivo utilizou 11 porcas da raça Large White com idade média de 12 semanas nas duas fases do estudo. Na fase I, o aneurisma foi produzido com um saco de pericárdio bovino através de cirurgia por via retroperitoneal sob anestesia geral; na fase II, 15 dias após a fase I, os animais foram submetidos a arteriografia e, posteriormente, a eutanásia, sendo os espécimes retirados para análise histológica.

Resultados

A formação de trombo parietal foi observada em todos os animais. A análise microscópica mostrou calcificações ao redor do trombo em 82% dos animais. Havia infiltrado linfoplasmocitário no enxerto e na área adjacente, com fibrose em nove animais. Três porcos tinham espessamento miointimal substancial, e oito tinham microcalcificações. A mortalidade foi zero, e não houve rupturas, isquemia ou infecção no local da cirurgia.

Conclusões

É um modelo único, com material biocompatível e de baixo custo. O pericárdio bovino é de fácil manuseio pelo cirurgião e possui características muito semelhantes ao tecido autólogo em sua integração com a parede celular.

Palavras-chave:
aneurisma de aorta abdominal; aneurisma de aorta; aneurisma

INTRODUCTION

The natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is to progress to rupture, a condition that is associated with a high mortality rate. AAA patients often have comorbidities that increase the risks inherent in surgical treatment, which limits its indications in many cases.¹ Aneurysms can be treated by open surgery or endovascular repair. The endovascular technique consists of placing an endograft through a minimally invasive operation, thus reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure.¹

Both techniques alter the natural history of the disease, limiting expansion by excluding the diseased aortic segment from the circulatory system and, therefore, preventing rupture in 90 to 98% of cases.^1,2 However, after endovascular repair, complications related to the devices employed can occur, such as leaks (endoleaks), migration, and fracture of the metal mesh.^3-5

Endografts and the associated catheters, guidewires, and delivery systems have improved over the last three decades. Endoprostheses have undergone changes in shape, size, and lining material, in search of the ideal device. However, studies with these devices require experimental models that must present anatomical and pathophysiological characteristics that emulate aneurysms in humans^6-8 and the animals most often used for these models are dogs and pigs.^9-13

There are animal models that use patches of different materials such as veins, muscular fascia, or synthetic materials such as Dacron, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and other models are based on destruction of lamellae of the tunic media.^7,11-16 However, most of these experimental models are expensive and are associated with high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality.^6,13

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histopathological characteristics, lesion stability in terms of rupture, reproducibility, morbidity, mortality, and patency of the aorta and its collateral branches in a new aneurysm model using bovine pericardium.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study using eleven female Large White pigs aged 12 weeks and weighing between 20 and 25 kg. This experimental study was approved by the Ethics and Bioethics Committee at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, under protocol 04.095. Before starting the project, a pilot study was carried out with two pigs to evaluate the anesthetic technique and the proposed surgical approach. The study was conducted in the Centro de Cirurgia Experimental at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.

The study was divided into two distinct parts: in phase I, an abdominal aortic aneurysm was made with a bovine pericardium patch. In phase II, 15 days after phase I, the animals were studied by aortography and then they were euthanized and material was removed for the anatomopathological study.

Phase I: in preparation for the anesthetic technique, the animals were weighed the night before the surgery and started on a 10-hour fast. They received pre-anesthetic induction with ketamine at a dosage of 10mg/kg and xylazine 2%, at a dosage of 0.5 to 1mg/kg, intramuscularly. During surgery, continuous infusion of saline solution was maintained by catheterization of the dorsal vein of the ear. The pulse oximeter was placed in the contralateral ear. The animals were given antibiotic prophylaxis with 1g of Cefazolin, the skin was degermed and the sterile field was prepared. Anesthesia was maintained by inhalation with 2% Isoflurane and oxygen at a rate of 0.5 L/min, continuously, through a mask with a closed system for rebreathing. Locoregional anesthesia was obtained by infiltration of the superficial and deep layers of the incision line with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Regarding the surgical technique, the aorta was approached via a left retroperitoneal access through an angled incision about 3 cm below the costal margin to the outer margin of the left abdominal rectus sheath. The aorta was exposed in the segment between the renal arteries and its terminal branches, keeping the posterolateral lumbar branches intact and controlled with false ligatures. Anticoagulation was performed with heparin 100U/kg of body weight, before clamping the aorta and performing arteriotomy in the anterior wall, 3.0 cm longitudinally, below the renal arteries. A glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium patch was washed with saline solution, and cut to 3.0X6.0 cm. It was then sutured to the aortotomy with a continuous 6-0 polypropylene suture. After removal of clamps from the aorta and its collaterals, any bleeding failures observed along the suture line were corrected with additional stitches. A successful procedure was confirmed by visualization and palpation of the aneurysm, the proximal aorta, its terminal portion, collateral branches, and femoral arteries (Figure 1). The animals were monitored for signs of pain, discomfort, dyspnea, limb weakness, bleeding, and pale membranes. Analgesia was performed as needed, with dipyrone, intramuscularly by a veterinarian at the animal research center. After recovery, the animals were placed in stalls and fed with an appropriate feed for their species and weight (VIPAL®, Brazil).

Figure 1
Saccular aneurysm after blood flow is released.

In phase II of the experiment, the same anesthetic regimen was used as in phase I. The superficial femoral artery was approached via a transverse incision in the left inguinal region, just below the inguinal ligament. Arteriography was performed using a 6-Fr introducer system and 5-Fr Pigtail angiographic catheter placed above the emergence of the renal arteries. A 20 mL volume of iodinated contrast was injected and images were acquired with a mobile C arm (General Electric model). The images were printed. The renal and mesenteric arteries, collateral arteries, terminal branches, and the aneurysm made with the bovine pericardium patch were visualized. After arteriography, a lethal dose of potassium chloride was administered for euthanasia. Through a xiphopubic incision, the aneurysmal abdominal aorta was removed en bloc and placed in formaldehyde. Slides were prepared by the researchers, stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE), and analyzed by a single pathologist, with an optical microscope, at the Department of Pathology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Sections were cut transversely in the suture planes and the bovine pericardium patch.

In the histological study, parietal inflammatory reaction, thrombus, presence of calcification, and presence of fibromuscular dysplasia of the suture line were evaluated. All slides were analyzed by the same pathologist.

RESULTS

There were no deaths, ruptured aneurysms, or ischemia of limbs or intra-abdominal viscera. There were also no local complications such as dehiscence at the suture of the muscle-aponeurotic wall and skin, hematoma, or infection. On arteriography (Figure 2), fifteen days later, all aneurysms were patent, as were vessels distal of the aneurysm. At the time of removal of the surgical specimen, slight adhesions to adjacent tissues were observed (Figure 3), with no signs of infection in any cases.

Figure 2
Aortography showing saccular aneurysm and patent lumbar arteries.

Figure 3
Inflammatory reaction perianeurysm: integration with adjacent structures.

Regarding thrombosis, pathological analysis showed that all eleven animals in the study had a thrombus in the aneurysm wall (Figure 4). In seven (63.6%), less than 50% of the vessel lumen was filled, and in the remainder, 50 to 90% of the aneurysmatic aorta diameter was filled. Thrombosis in organization was observed in nine pigs and organized thrombosis was found in two pigs (Table 1). Microcalcifications in the mural thrombus (Figure 5) were seen in 9 animals (81.8%) with 95%CI of 51.73-96.13.

Figure 4
Aneurysm wall thrombosis.

Table 1
Presence of trombosis.

Thrombosis	Number (n)	Percentage (%)	95% Confidence Interval (CI)
In organization	9	81.8	51.73-96.13
Organized	2	18.2	12.79-66.36
Total	11	100

Figure 5
Thrombus with calcification.

Regarding inflammation, the acute inflammatory process occurred in all animals (Figure 6), there was chronic inflammation in seven, and fibrosis in nine (Table 2).

Figure 6
Inflammatory cells and neovascularization.

Table 2
Presence of inflammation or fibrosis.

Inflammation	Number (n)	Percentage (%)	95%CI
Acute	11	100.0	76.60-100
Chronic	7	63.6	33.64-87.22
Fibrosis	9	81.8	62.66-99.55

Evident myointimal thickening close to the suture line of the bovine pericardium patch, compared to the portion of the aorta without the lesion, was classified as severe and observed in 3 animals. Eight pigs (72.7%) had microcalcifications in the suture area and in seven (63.6%) there were associated inflammatory cells. No wall necrosis was evident (Table 3).

Table 3
Presence of myointimal thickening.

Myointimal thickening	Number (n)	Percentage (%)	CI 95%
Severe	3	27.3	7.45-57.81
With microcalcification	8	72.7	42.19-92.55
Associated with inflammation	7	63.6	33.60-87.20
Necrosis	0	-	-

DISCUSSION

The extant literature refers to the pig as an animal with great similarity to humans in terms of anatomy, fibrinolytic system, coagulation, and response to intimal injury.¹⁷ In terms of swine breeds, there does not seem to be any superiority or any important differences,^17-19 We therefore opted for female pigs of the Large White breed, because they were readily available and their lineage and kinship are known.

Most studies to develop experimental models that reproduce the anatomical and pathophysiological characteristics of abdominal aortic aneurysms were conducted in the past decade or earlier. The model of aneurysm in dogs described by Economou in 1960,⁷ with resection of the adventitial layer and 70% of the middle layer, is difficult to execute and has very high morbidity and mortality. Dissection of the middle layer seems to be critical to the success of this model: when below 60%, it fails to produce the lesion and when greater than 70%, it tends to rupture. Even the modification of this technique by Mirich,²⁰ with the removal of an adventitious layer band followed by balloon dilatation, obtained an unsatisfactory diameter of 46% (36-58%). This model is undoubtedly very difficult to implement and is associated with a high failure rate and high costs.

The model published by Hallisey,⁷ in 1997, also using dogs, was exclusively transluminal. In this model, the aorta was dilated with a Palmaz stent to twice its normal diameter. The lumbar arteries were preserved, maintaining the anatomical condition observed in humans, but the model is expensive and the aneurysm is limited by the metallic mesh of the stent, making it totally different from aneurysms in humans.

Other authors have described models in which the vascular graft replaces a segment of the aorta with an end-to-end suture. The materials most used were Dacron and internal jugular vein treated with glutaraldehyde.^7,21 These constructed aneurysms are used to evaluate the performance of introducer systems and release of devices, but cannot be used to study biological responses and integration. In addition, in common with the Elastase Model,^7,18 in which an enzyme is used to destroy part of the aortic wall, leaving it weakened and increasing its diameter, the collateral branches of these arteries, such as the lumbar arteries, are not preserved.

Another model frequently used employs patches to enlarge a segment of the aorta, thus forming an aneurysm. Various materials such as muscular fascia, vein, peritoneum, and Dacron have been used.^{8,10,13,15,22} The greatest advantage of this model is that it preserves the patency of the lumbar arteries.

More recently, creation of saccular aneurysms using Dacron patches has been reported.²³ This model has the advantage of preserving the lumbar arteries and forming a stable aneurysm due to its low tendency to rupture.

Bovine pericardium is an easy-to-buy and low-cost material, as it is generally removed in meat packing plants and slaughterhouses and preparation with glutaraldehyde is simple.²⁴ It is available ready prepared and in various sizes, keeping the cost down.²⁵ The disadvantage that has been observed in arterial repairs and in heart valves is calcification.^25,26 This was also observed in this study and is actually a positive point, because aneurysms in humans usually exhibit calcification in the wall.²⁷

Most of the animal models found used the transperitoneal access to the aorta, which can be associated with high mortality.¹³ The retroperitoneal technique avoids handling of intestinal loops, which is associated with greater morbidity and mortality in pigs.^24,28

The cross-sections analyzed included the area of the pericardium patch implant, the suture line and the posterior wall of the aorta. Uflaker²³ reported thrombus with retraction and calcification in the suture at six weeks and organized thrombus with retraction at the twelfth week. The present study shows an organized thrombus with microcalcifications and calcifications in the suture after two weeks.

In all animals there was formation of mural thrombus and in 82% there were calcifications in the region of the thrombus. Lymphoplasmocytic infiltration was present in the graft and the peri-graft region, with fibrosis in 82% of the animals, and significant myointimal thickening in the suture line in three animals. None of the complications reported in other studies were observed, such as hind leg paralysis,^13,21-23 death from anesthetic complications,²² renal failure,²⁰ early rupture,^13,20 or thrombosis of the aorta and iliac.²³

Regarding the anesthesia technique, we chose to use face mask ventilation with room air and oxygen instead of orotracheal intubation. Both methods are widely used in the literature^11,13,23,24 and the use of a face mask has been shown to be effective, with no risk of glottis edema or need to use atropine to reduce secretions.²⁴The bovine pericardium patch has also been described in swine models.²⁹ That study used hybrid pigs (crossbred Large White and Landrace), with a transperitoneal approach. Patency of the aorta and the aneurysm patch was confirmed with Doppler ultrasonography and the model of abdominal aortic aneurysm was not analyzed histologically. Formation of a mural thrombus was observed in all animals, with 18% of them showing occlusion of the aneurysm sac, ruling out use in studies for development of new endovascular prostheses. None of the animals in our study presented occlusion of the aneurysm sac.

This study is important because the histopathological analysis showed that the aneurysm created using the bovine pericardium patch exhibits microscopic changes that are similar to those in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. In addition, use of arteriography allowed us to observe the flow in the postoperative period. The limitation of this study is the small number of animals used. In addition, all of the pigs’ aortas had no previous pathological changes.

The bovine pericardium patch model achieves the initial objective of attaining a diameter greater than 50% of the initial aorta and maintaining this vessel and its collateral and terminal branches patent. There are also similar structural findings to aneurysms in humans: parietal and periadventitial inflammatory reaction, thrombus, and calcifications of the wall. The anesthetic and operative techniques developed are satisfactory and there was zero morbidity and mortality in the period evaluated.

In conclusion, the bovine pericardium patch aneurysm is a unique model, which uses inexpensive, biocompatible material and the technology needed for preparation is available in our setting. In addition to its economic advantages, bovine pericardium is easy for the surgeon to handle and has very similar characteristics to autologous tissue in terms of its integration with the cell wall.

• How to cite: Perini SC, Bertolucci LH, Martins APD, França LHG, Aveline CC, Pereira AH. Abdominal aortic aneurysm model in swine with bovine pericardium patch. J Vasc Bras. 2021;20:e20210080. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.210080
• Financial support: undo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE) – HCPA.
• The study was carried out at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al. Editor’s Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020 PMid:30528142.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020
• ²
  Blum U, Voshage G, Lammer J, et al. Endoluminal Stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(1):13-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199701023360103 PMid:8970935.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199701023360103
• ³
  Prinssen M, Verhoeven ELG, Buth J, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042002 PMid:15483279.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042002
• ⁴
  Ouriel K, Clair DG, Greenberg RK, et al. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(5):991-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.170 PMid:12756344.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.170
• ⁵
  White GH. What are the causes of endotension? J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8(5):454-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152660280100800505 PMid:11718402.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152660280100800505
• ⁶
  Gorin DR, Arbid EJ, D’Agostino R, et al. A new generation endovascular graft for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Am J Surg. 1997;173(3):159-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89588-8 PMid:9124618.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89588-8
• ⁷
  Narayanaswamy M, Wright KC, Kandarpa K. Animal models for atherosclerosis, restenosis, and endovascular graft research. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(1):5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61271-8 PMid:10693708.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61271-8
• ⁸
  Chuter TA, Viscomi S, Slater JL, Nowygrod R, Risberg B. Canine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm treated by endovascular graft implantation. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5(5):490-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00057-4 PMid:9464606.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(97)00057-4
• ⁹
  Maynar M, Qian Z, Hernandez J, et al. An animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm created with peritoneal patch: technique and initial results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26(2):168-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-002-2598-1 PMid:12616417.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-002-2598-1
• ¹⁰
  Eton D, Warner D, Owens C, et al. Results of endoluminal grafting in an experimental aortic aneurysm model. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(5):819-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70244-6 PMid:8667503.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(96)70244-6
• ¹¹
  Hong-De Wu M, Shi Q, Bhattacharya V, Sauvage L. Development of a symmetric canine abdominal aortic aneurysm model with clinical relevance for endovascular graft studies. J Invest Surg. 2001;14(4):235-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419301750420278 PMid:11680534.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419301750420278
• ¹²
  Lerouge S, Raymond J, Salazkin I, et al. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with stent-grafts: experimental models can reproduce endoleaks. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15(9):971-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000130816.33038.ED PMid:15361565.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000130816.33038.ED
• ¹³
  Ruiz CE, Zhang HP, Butt AI, Whittaker P. Percutaneous treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a swine model: understanding the behavior of aortic aneurysm closure through a serial histopathological analysis. Circulation. 1997;96(7):2438-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.96.7.2438 PMid:9337221.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.96.7.2438
• ¹⁴
  May J, White GH, Harris JP. Devices for aortic aneurysm repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1999;79(3):507-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70021-9 PMid:10410684.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70021-9
• ¹⁵
  Diaz S, Uzieblo MR, Desai KM, et al. Type II endoleak in porcine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(2):339-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.04.003 PMid:15297831.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.04.003
• ¹⁶
  Wolf YG, Gertz SD, Banai S. Animal models in syndromes of accelerated arteriosclerosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13(3):328-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-5096(06)61774-3 PMid:10347269.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-5096(06)61774-3
• ¹⁷
  Dua MM, Dalman RL. Hemodynamic influences on abdominal aortic aneurysm disease: Application of biomechanics to aneurysm pathophysiology. Vascul Pharmacol. 2010;53(1-2):11-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2010.03.004 PMid:20347049.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2010.03.004
• ¹⁸
  Dobrin PB. Animal models of aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13(6):641-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100169900315 PMid:10541623.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100169900315
• ¹⁹
  Michael Swindle M, Smith AC. Swine in the laboratory: surgery, anesthesia, imaging, and experimental techniques. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19430
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19430
• ²⁰
  Mirich D, Wright KC, Wallace S, et al. Percutaneously placed endovascular grafts for aortic aneurysms: feasibility study. Radiology. 1989;170(3 Pt 2):1033-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.170.3.2916054 PMid:2916054.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.170.3.2916054
• ²¹
  Whitbread T, Birch P, Rogers S, et al. A new animal model for abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial results using a multiple-wire stent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11(1):90-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80141-9 PMid:8564494.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80141-9
• ²²
  Skillern CS, Stevens SL, Piercy KT, Donnell RL, Freeman MB, Goldman MH. Endotension in an experimental aneurysm model. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(4):814-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(02)00138-6 PMid:12368743.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0741-5214(02)00138-6
• ²³
  Uflacker R, Brothers T. Filling of the aneurysmal sac with DEAC-glucosamine in an animal model of abdominal aortic aneurysm following stent-graft repair. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;47(4):425-36. PMid:16953162.
• ²⁴
  França LHG, Pereira AH, Perini SC, et al. Modelo experimental de aneurisma sacular de artéria ilíaca comum com pericárdio bovino em suínos. J Vasc Bras. 2005;4(4):353-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492005000400010
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492005000400010
• ²⁵
  Biasi GM, Sternjakob S, Mingazzini PM, Ferrari SA. Nine-year experience of bovine pericardium patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(2):271-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.123685 PMid:12170207.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.123685
• ²⁶
  Stolf NAG, Brandão CMA, Faber CN, Pêgo- Fernandes PM, Costa R, Jatene AD. Pseudo-aneurisma em tubo valvulado de pericárdio bovino corrugado após reconstrução da aorta ascendente: relato de caso. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 1999;14(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76381999000400009
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76381999000400009
• ²⁷
  Kent KC. Clinical practice: abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(22):2101-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1401430 PMid:25427112.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1401430
• ²⁸
  Grüdtner MA, Pereira AH, Costa LFM, Souza GG, Argenta R, Longhi JA. Efeitos a curto prazo de ‘stents’ não recobertos e recobertos com politetrafluoroetileno em aorta de suínos: um modelo experimental. Acta Cir Bras. 2004;19(2):126-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502004000200008
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502004000200008
• ²⁹
  Aquino M A, Barros SM, Castro AA, Pitta GB, Pereira AH. Experimental model of saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm in swines with pericardium sac. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2016;31(1):70-3. PMid:27074279.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  01 Sept 2021
• Date of issue
  2021

History

• Received
  29 Mar 2021
• Accepted
  10 June 2021