Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm: endovascular approach

Abstract

Aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal arteries are a rare condition. In the majority of cases, diagnosis is made in emergency situations due to complications such as rupture, which is associated with high mortality rates (21-26%). Embolization of the aneurysm sac is the treatment of choice, because of its high efficacy and lower mortality. This article presents and discusses a case of inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm that was diagnosed during investigation of gastrointestinal symptoms. The treatment provided was microcoil embolization, with complete exclusion of the aneurysm and a good clinical course.

Keywords:
aneurysm; endovascular procedures; therapeutic embolization

Resumo

Os aneurismas das artérias pancreatoduodenais constituem uma afecção rara. Seu diagnóstico é realizado, na maioria das vezes, em situações de emergência por complicações como a rotura, a qual está associada a altas taxas de mortalidade (21-26%). A embolização do saco aneurismático é o tratamento de escolha, devido à sua alta efetividade e menor mortalidade. Neste artigo, é apresentado e discutido um caso de aneurisma de artéria pancreatoduodenal inferior com diagnóstico obtido durante investigação de sintomas gastrointestinais. O tratamento instituído foi a embolização com micromolas, com completa exclusão do aneurisma e boa evolução clínica.

Palavras-chave:
aneurisma; procedimentos endovasculares; embolização terapêutica

INTRODUCTION

Aneurysms of the visceral arteries (VAA) are rare, with an incidence of 0.02% in the general population.^1-3 Aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal artery (PDAA) are the least frequent type, accounting for just 2% of all VAA,⁴ and inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms (iPDAA) are the least often described subtype.^1-3

Use of angiotomography has increased the number of PDAA diagnoses, as a result of incidental findings.^1-3 Nonetheless, the majority of PDAA are still discovered and treated in emergency situations, with increased risk of complications such as hemoperitoneum and hypovolemic shock, with rates of aneurysm rupture in the literature in the range of 45-53%.^3-5 These aneurysms are supplied by collateral vessels with hyperdynamic flow and are often associated with occlusive stenosis of the celiac trunk (CT) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA).^3,4

Endovascular treatment is the preferred method, except in cases of suspected visceral ischemia, in patients with hostile vascular anatomy, or if prior endovascular treatment has failed. In such cases, an open approach is indicated.^2,3

We report on endovascular treatment of a large true IPDAA without significant stenosis (stenosis > 60%) of the main arterial trunks, using superselective navigation with microcatheters and embolization with microcoils.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 62-year-old, hypertensive woman, with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia, was undergoing ambulatory investigation for postprandial fullness with a gastroenterologist. She had no family or personal history of rheumatic diseases, episodes of digestive hemorrhage, postprandial pain, abdominal traumas, alcoholic beverage consumption, pancreatitis, or recent weight loss. Angiotomography showed a large IPDAA, with dimensions of 54 x 60 mm, connecting the SMA to the gastroduodenal artery. The SMA did not have ostial plaque, while the CT had ostial plaque causing stenosis estimated at approximately 20% (Figure 1). A transthoracic echocardiogram found no evidence of pathological changes.

Figure 1
(A) Left anterior oblique volumetric angiotomographic reconstruction showing a large inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm; (B) Right anterior oblique volumetric angiotomographic reconstruction showing communications with the celiac trunk (CT) via the gastroduodenal artery and with the superior mesenteric artery via the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery; (C) Axial angiotomographic slice showing the ostial plaque in the CT; (D) Sagittal angiotomographic slice showing the ostial plaque in the CT causing approximately 20% stenosis.

The management option chosen was arteriography followed by superselective navigation with microcatheters and embolization with microcoils. The procedure was performed in the angiography suite, under local anesthesia and conscious sedation, with femoral access and a 5 Fr introducer (Terumo Medical, Somerset, United States). After arteriographic study with sequential and selective catheterization of the CT and SMA, the decision was taken to catheterize the SMA and perform superselective navigation with a microcatheter via the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery to the large aneurysm. Embolization was performed using a Rebar-18® microcatheter (ev3; Plymouth, United States) and a SilverSpeed-16® microguidewire (ev3; Plymouth, Minnesota, United States), followed by embolization with 6 18 mm x 40 cm Axium® Prime 3D detachable microcoils (ev3; Plymouth, United States). After complete embolization of the aneurysm, a second selective arteriographic study via the CT and SMA showed complete exclusion of the IPDAA and improved perfusion of the intestinal loops (Figure 2).

Figure 2
(A) Arteriography via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), with selective catheterization; (B) Microcatheter selection of the large aneurysm of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery; (C) Selective arteriography of the SMA after embolization with microcoils, showing complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac; (D) Selective arteriography of the celiac trunk after embolization with microcoils, showing complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac.

Postoperative monitoring took place in the intensive care unit, with good progress and hospital discharge on the second day after the procedure. Control angiotomography at 1 month showed the SMA and CT were patent, with complete exclusion of the IPDAA. At 1-year outpatients follow-up, the patient reported resolution of the postprandial complaints described previously (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Postoperative volumetric angiotomographic reconstruction showing no filling of the aneurysm, which has been completely excluded.

DISCUSSION

Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms are extremely rare, but are probably undernotified, since symptoms are nonspecific and the location makes diagnosis less likely.^5,6 They affect both sexes with equal incidence,^5,6 and mean age of greatest diagnostic frequency is 60 years.⁶ The primary cause of true IPDAAs is occlusion or stenosis of one of the main arterial trunks, whether the SMA or the CT, the second of which is more often involved (80%); these aneurysms are related to occlusive arterial disease involving the ostia of the trunk arteries in 50-80% of cases.^3,7,8 After this event, the velocity of blood flow to the pancreatic arterial arches increases, causing progressive dilation of the arterial lumen (the hyperdynamic collateral circulation hypothesis).^2,5,8,9 Other reported causes are atherosclerosis, connective tissue diseases, and infections.^5,10 For many years the last of these were considered the primary cause of IPDAA (60%), but recent studies have shown that atherosclerotic disease is the most common cause and infectious etiology is responsible for 4.8% of cases diagnosed, rather than over half, as was previously thought.¹⁰ The patient in this case was diagnosed with a true IPDAA, since she did not meet the criteria for suspected mycotic infection or connective tissue diseases and also did not have ostial stenosis of the CT or SMA, ruling out the hyperdynamic collateral circulation hypothesis.^2,5,8,9 In view of this, the probable cause of this patient’s aneurysm is atherosclerotic disease.

The principal complication associated with IPDAA is rupture, with incidence and mortality rates in the range of 45-62% and 21-26%, respectively.^3,11,12 A significant proportion of diagnoses of this condition are made in emergencies, with symptoms of epigastralgia or abdominal pains that radiate to the back and may be accompanied by signs of shock or hemoperitoneum secondary to aneurysmal rupture.¹⁰ This complication is independent of aneurysm size.⁹

The patient described had a gastrointestinal complaint of postprandial fullness under ambulatory investigation, leading to the diagnosis of IPDAA after abdominal angiotomography. Nonspecific abdominal pains, nausea, vomiting, jaundice, and gastrointestinal bleeding are symptoms that may be present in these cases. Aneurysms of infectious origin may cause fever. On physical examination, a pulsating abdominal mass or abdominal murmur may be found, but are rare. The frequent presence of these manifestations in patients with IPDAA distinguishes them from those with other types of aneurysms of splanchnic arteries, the majority of which are asymptomatic (90%);¹⁰ however, in the majority of cases, diagnosis is made after rupture of the aneurysm. In view of their elevated mortality, VAA should be part of the differential diagnosis for all patients with sudden abdominal pains combined with anemia.⁹ Work-up examinations that are useful for diagnosis include abdominal Doppler ultrasonography, which is an inexpensive and accessible method; magnetic resonance angiography; and angiotomography (the gold standard), which provides the information necessary for both diagnosis and treatment planning.^9,10

Since the condition is rare, treatment indications are controversial in the literature and it is necessary to evaluate factors such as age, clinical presentation, aneurysm characteristics, associated comorbidities, and risk factors.^3,5,10 There is some consensus on the indications for repair of true aneurysms: diameter exceeding 20-25 mm, even if asymptomatic; symptomatic patients; female patients of reproductive age; and aneurysms associated with inflammatory or infectious processes, connective tissue disease, vasculitis, or congenital diseases, because of the high risk of rupture.^5,6,9,13,14 Pseudoaneurysms should be treated immediately after they are identified, because of the elevated risk of rupture.^5,7,9 Available treatment options include conventional surgical treatment (open repair) and endovascular approaches. Conventional surgery is indicated in hemodynamically unstable patients, when there is a need for revascularization of blood flow, and in cases of aneurysms in territories that are inaccessible to endovascular technique or after failure of embolization. The technique consists of proximal and distal ligature of the artery, exeresis of the aneurysm, and reconstruction of the artery. In addition to being a more invasive procedure, open repair involves limitations caused by difficulties with accessing the aneurysm and is associated with mortality rates in the range of 15-23.7%.^5,7,10

As the techniques and devices available have evolved, endovascular treatment with embolization of the aneurysm has become the treatment of choice in these cases, due to its effectiveness (67-100%), lower mortality rate (2.7%), lower risk of rupture, less postoperative pain, and shorter recovery time after the procedure, with consequent earlier return to daily activities, and it is also an option for patients with a history of abdominal surgery who have a hostile abdomen.^5,9,10 However, certain determinants limit its use: low availability in emergency centers, risk of injury secondary to access, and embolization of target organs, in addition to the high cost.⁹

Embolization options include use of cyanoacrylate, coils, or covered or conventional stents, which can be combined in some situations.^7,9,10 Other percutaneous treatment options are flow diversion and percutaneous thrombin injection.^9,15,16 The choice of technique is dependent on the need to preserve the feeder artery, on anatomic characteristics, and on the type of aneurysm, in addition to the degree of tortuosity of the native artery. Adequate treatment of the aneurysm is guaranteed by complete embolization of all entry and exit arteries.^9,15,16

The patient in this case had an oligosymptomatic IPDAA with dimensions of 54 x 60 mm that had not ruptured. Since she was compatible with the criteria for indication of the treatment approach most supported in the literature, and also because of the high risk of rupture, elective treatment using endovascular techniques was indicated, performed by embolization with 6 Axium® Prime 3D detachable microcoils (ev3; Plymouth, Minnesota, USA), achieving permanent thrombosis of the aneurysm sac and its exclusion. Embolization was total, as confirmed intraoperatively by selective angiography of the CT and SMA, with improved intestinal blood flow and good postoperative recovery, including resolution of the preexisting clinical symptoms. Control angiotomography at 1 month confirmed total thrombosis of the aneurysm and found no evidence of filling.

• How to cite: Metzger PB, Costa KR, Silva SL, et al. Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm: endovascular approach. J Vasc Bras. 2021;20:e20200101. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.200101

• Financial support:

  None.
• Approved by local Ethical committee.
• The study was carried out at Hospital da Bahia (HBA), Salvador, BA, Brazil.

REFERÊNCIAS

• ¹
  Vandy FC, Sell KA, Eliason JL, Coleman DM, Rectenwald JE, Stanley JC. Pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal artery aneurysms associated with celiac artery occlusive disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;41:32-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.09.018 PMid:28238920.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2016.09.018
• ²
  Jacobs CR, Crawford JD, Fatima J. Hybrid management approach for superior mesenteric artery and branch aneurysms. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2019;5(4):521-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2019.10.002 PMid:31909308.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2019.10.002
• ³
  Bonardelli S, Spampinato B, Ravanelli M, et al. The role of emergency presentation and revascularization in aneurysms of the peripancreatic arteries secondary to celiac trunk or superior mesenteric artery occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):46S-55S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.051 PMid:32093911.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.051
• ⁴
  Kitaoka T, Deguchi J, Kamiya C, Suzuki J, Sato O. Pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm formation with superior mesenteric artery stenosis. Ann Vasc Dis. 2014;7(3):312-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.cr.14-00040 PMid:25298835.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.cr.14-00040
• ⁵
  Fetti AC, Puia VR, Comsa M, Stanca MH, Puia A, Al Hajjar N. Inferior pancreatico-duodenal artery aneurysm with superior mesenteric artery stenosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020;29(1):115-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15403/jgld-390 PMid:32176753.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.15403/jgld-390
• ⁶
  Nasser F, Affonso BB, Jesus-Silva SG, et al. Endovascular treatment for superior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm: case report. J Vasc Bras. 2010;9(3):182-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492010000300016
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492010000300016
• ⁷
  Sutton D, Lawton G. Coeliac stenosis or occlusion with aneurysm of the collateralsupply. Clin Radiol. 1973;24(1):49-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(73)80114-X PMid:4723494.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(73)80114-X
• ⁸
  Kadir S, Athanasoulis CA, Yune HY, Wilkov H. Aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal arteries in association with celiac axis occlusion. Cardiovasc Radiol. 1978;1(3):173-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02552029 PMid:743713.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02552029
• ⁹
  Kallamadi R, Demoya MA, Kalva SP. Inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms in association with celiac stenosis/occlusion. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009;26(3):215-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225671 PMid:21326566.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225671
• ¹⁰
  Obara H, Kentaro M, Inoue M, Kitagawa Y. Current management strategies for visceral artery aneurysms: an overview. Surg Today. 2020;50(1):38-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01898-3 PMid:31620866.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-019-01898-3
• ¹¹
  Bortoluzzi C, Franzon O, Viana R, Mattiello L, Stahelin AHS. Duplo aneurisma de artéria mesentérica superior: relato de caso. J Vasc Bras. 2018;17(4):328-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.005818 PMid:30787952.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.005818
• ¹²
  Moore E, Matthews MR, Minion DJ, et al. Surgical management of peripancreatic arterial aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(2):247-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.045 PMid:15297817.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2004.03.045
• ¹³
  de Perrot M, Berney T, Deleaval J, Buhler L, Mentha G, Morel P. Management of true aneurysms of the pancreaticoduodenal arteries. Ann Surg. 1999;229(3):416-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199903000-00016 PMid:10077055.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199903000-00016
• ¹⁴
  Habib N, Hassan S, Abdou R, et al. Gastroduodenal artery aneurysm, diagnosis, clinical presentation and management: a concise review. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2013;7(1):4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-7-4 PMid:23587203.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-7-4
• ¹⁵
  Tulsyan N, Kashyap VS, Greenberg RK, et al. The endovascular management of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(2):276-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.049 PMid:17264002.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.049
• ¹⁶
  Hemp JH, Sabri SS. Endovascular management of visceral arterial aneurysms. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18(1):14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2014.12.003 PMid:25814199.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.tvir.2014.12.003

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  10 May 2021
• Date of issue
  2021

History

• Received
  10 June 2020
• Accepted
  24 Aug 2020