Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Neurourology & Female Urology

UROLOGICAL SURVEY

PURPOSE: There is no universally accepted definition of bladder outlet obstruction in women. We compared 5 contemporary urodynamic definitions and determined how well they correlated with each other and with clinical suspicion of bladder outlet obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 154 women who underwent videourodynamics were prospectively evaluated. Clinical obstruction was suspected when history, physical examination, symptoms and basic testing before urodynamics raised the suspicion. Women were classified as having obstruction based on 5 contemporary definitions, including 3 pressure flow cutoff point criteria, videourodynamic criteria and the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram. The McNemar Test was used to compare each definition to the others and to suspicion of clinical obstruction.

RESULTS: Of the women 91 were evaluable, including 26 (29%) with obstruction by videourodynamic criteria, 28 (31%) with obstruction by 1998 cut point criteria, 18 (20%) with obstruction by 2000 cut point criteria, 13 (14%) with obstruction by 2004 cut point criteria and 38 (42%) with obstruction by the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram. Videourodynamic and 1998 cut point criteria were not significantly different from each other (78.9% concordance) and each agreed with the clinically obstructed category in the comparison. Compared to the other criteria, the Blaivas-Groutz nomogram overestimated obstruction, while 2004 cut point criteria tended to underestimate it.

CONCLUSIONS: Each urodynamic definition of female bladder outlet obstruction has merit. Videourodynamic criteria and 1998 cut point criteria have the highest concordance. The Blaivas-Groutz nomogram overestimates obstruction compared to the other criteria. Therefore, it should not be used as the sole or standard definition of obstruction in women.

Editorial Comment

The authors prospectively reviewed a cohort of women who had clinical suspicion of bladder outlet obstruction. The patients underwent a full evaluation including fluoroscopic urodynamic studies. The data obtained was applied to five definitions for female bladder outlet obstruction. The application results were then compared to each other and then to the clinical situation at hand.

This is an excellent study was well planned and very illustrative of the difficulty in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women in an absolute manner. The authors point out the challenge in diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in females who have a current neurologic diagnosis or who do not generate a detrusor contraction during their urodynamic study. In addition, the results and discussion highlight the importance of combining clinical suspicion, physical examination, urodynamic evaluation as well as radiographic imaging during the diagnostic process. In our practice, though we incorporate multiple variables similar to this article in the evaluation of female bladder outlet obstruction, we do rely to a pronounced degree on the radiographic imaging during the patient's micturitional cycle. This is definitely a reference article for the urologic surgeon, especially those involved in tertiary evaluations in female urology.

Dr. Steven P. Petrou

Associate Professor of Urology

Chief of Surgery, St. Luke's Hospital

Associate Dean, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education

Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Female Sexual and Hormonal Status in Patients with Bronchial Asthma: Relationship with Respiratory Function Tests and Psychological and Somatic Status

Basar MM, Ekici A, Bulcun E, Tuglu D, Ekici MS, Batislam E.

Department of Urology, University of Kirikkale Faculty of Medicine, Kirikkale, Turkey

Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):421-5

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship among the sexual, hormonal, physical, and psychological status of women with bronchial asthma (BA) compared with that of healthy volunteers.

METHODS: Thirty-eight women with BA were enrolled in the study. The patients were asked to complete the Female Sexual Function Index, General Health Questionnaire, and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36). Using the answers on the SF-36, the mental and physical component summary scores were calculated. A total of 20 healthy women were enrolled in the study as the control group. The same questionnaires were given to this group as well. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation tests.

RESULTS: At the end of the study, statistically significant differences were observed for all questionnaire scores (P <0.05). The most common female sexual dysfunction was diminished arousal (n = 30, 78.9%) in women with BA. In the correlation analysis, the total Female Sexual Function Index score had a statistically significant and positive correlation with the mental component summary score (r = 0.503, P = 0.001) and a negative correlation with the General Health Questionnaire score (r = -0.380, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that BA, as a chronic medical condition, can be a cause of female sexual dysfunction with mental and psychiatric mechanisms.

Editorial Comment

The authors reviewed the association of bronchial asthma (BA) upon female sexual function and dysfunction. The study cohort consisted of 38 married, pre-menopausal women with a diagnosis of bronchial asthma and a control group of 20 healthy women who were also married and pre-menopausal. According to the American Thoracic Society, patients with bronchial asthma did suffer from symptoms of shortness of breath, wheezing and coughing. Patients were excluded if they were older than 50 years old or if their husbands had a sexual dysfunction. The questionnaire forms utilized did encompass quality of life, psychological status as well as sexual status. The female sexual function index included the categories of arousal, desire, orgasm, lubrication, pain and satisfaction. The authors found that the most common sexual problem associated with bronchial asthma was diminished arousal. They do note that though the initiation of sexual activity in women with bronchial asthma was difficult, if arousal and interest could be achieved then successful intercourse could be completed.

The topic of female sexual dysfunction is very popular in both the lay press as well as with professional study. This study excellently explores the effect of chronic disease upon a woman's sexual being. The authors do note that a positive mood and well being were the most important parameters controlling sexual activity in women. In view that there have been findings of difference in qualitative and quantitative difference in visually evoked sexual arousal between pre-menopausal and menopausal without bronchial asthma it would be interesting to see if this was mirrored in the population with bronchial asthma (1). In addition, in view that all the patients in this study were married, it would be of both scientific interest and great social commentary to see if a study cohort of unmarried women were more easily aroused than ones who were married when exposed to visual erotic stimuli and the areas of the brain affected (2).

References

1. Jeong GW, Park K, Youn G, Kang HK, Kim HJ, Seo JJ, et al.: Assessment of cerebrocortical regions associated with sexual arousal in premenopausal and menopausal women by using BOLD-based functional MRI. J Sex Med. 2005; 2: 645-51.

2. Park K, Kang HK, Seo JJ, Kim HJ, Ryu SB, Jeong GW. Blood-oxygenation-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating cerebral regions of female sexual arousal response. Urology. 2001; 57: 1189-94.

Dr. Steven P. Petrou

Associate Professor of Urology

Chief of Surgery, St. Luke's Hospital

Associate Dean, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education

Jacksonville, Florida, USA

  • Neurourology & Female Urology

    Comparison of Diagnostic Criteria for Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction
    Akikwala TV, Fleischman N, Nitti VW
    Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
    J Urol. 2006; 176: 2093-7
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      02 July 2007
    • Date of issue
      Apr 2007
    Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia Rua Bambina, 153, 22251-050 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel. +55 21 2539-6787, Fax: +55 21 2246-4088 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
    E-mail: brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br