SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue5Value of ultrasound in evaluation of infants with first urinary tract infectionLaparoscopic extended lymphadenectomy for bladder and prostate cancer author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


International braz j urol

Print version ISSN 1677-5538

Int. braz j urol. vol.36 no.5 Rio de Janeiro Sept./Oct. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000500029 

UROLOGICAL SURVEY

 

Pediatric Urology

 

Management of abnormal postvoid residual urine in children with dysfunctional voiding

 

Kibar Y, Piskin M, Irkilata HC, Aydur E, Gok F, Dayanc M
Section of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey
Urology. 2010; 75: 1472-5

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of biofeedback therapy on the residual urine volume in children with dysfunctional voiding.
Methods: This prospective study was conducted in children with dysfunctional voiding associated with abnormal postvoid residual urine (PVR) from June 2002 to 2007. The children were divided randomly into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with standard urotherapy combined with biofeedback therapy and group 2 was treated with only standard urotherapy. The outcomes of uroflow-electromyography pattern, urinary tract infection (UTI), and PVR were recorded before and at the end of sixth month of treatment.
Results: A total of 94 patients were enrolled in this study. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 62 and 32 patients, respectively. The voiding pattern became normal in 80.6% (50/62) and 56.2% (18/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The PVR resolved in 40 of 62 (64.5%) patients in group 1 and in 11 of 32 (34.4%) children in group 2. Before the treatment, UTI was noted in 22.5% of patients (14/62) in group 1 and 21.8% of patients (7/32) in group 2. After the treatment, UTI was observed in 3.2% of patients (2/62) and in 9.3% (3/32) of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although both treatment modalities changed the voiding pattern, rate of febrile UTI, and PVR positively, these outcomes were better in a combination group.
Conclusions: The combination of standard urotherapy with the biofeedback therapy improved the results significantly.

Editorial Comment

This is a prospective study looking at the efficacy of standard behavioral therapy compared to behavioral therapy plus biofeedback training. The authors enrolled 94 patients in the study, all of whom had a staccato voiding pattern on uroflow consistent with dysfunctional voiding. The authors not only looked at postvoid residuals but also examined the prevalence of urinary tract infection and flow rate at the beginning of the study and after six months of treatment. There were no significant differences in the demographics of the patient populations. Improvement was noted in both groups of patients at the end of the study; however, the biofeedback group had significantly better outcomes in terms of the prevalence of infections, elimination of postvoid residual and improvement in flow rate.

While there is no question that we can improve outcomes in children with standard behavioral therapy alone, this study adds to the growing data demonstrating the improved efficacy of combining this with biofeedback therapy. It would be nice to have some follow-up data to examine the durability of treatment in these patients beyond six months.

 

M. Chad Wallis
Division of Pediatric Urology
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
E-mail: chad.wallis@hsc.utah.edu

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License