SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.40 issue4Increased Tissue Factor Expression is an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Clear Cell Carcinoma of the KidneyValue of color doppler ultrasound, kub and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral stones author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


International braz j urol

Print version ISSN 1677-5538

Int. braz j urol. vol.40 no.4 Rio de Janeiro July/Aug. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.09 

Original Article

Use of the probability of stone formation (PSF) score to assess stone forming risk and treatment response in a cohort of Brazilian stone formers

Benjamin Turney 1  

William Robertson 2  

Oliver Wiseman 3  

Carmen Regina P. R. Amaro 4  

Victor A. Leitão 5  

Isabela Leme da Silva 4  

João Luiz Amaro 5  

1Department of Urology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

2Deparment of Urolithiasis Research, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom

3Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom;

4Department of Urinary Lithiasis Metabolism Service,  School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil

5Department of Urology, School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Introduction

The aim was to confirm that PSF (probability of stone formation) changed appropriately following medical therapy on recurrent stone formers.

Materials and Methods

Data were collected on 26 Brazilian stone-formers. A baseline 24-hour urine collection was performed prior to treatment. Details of the medical treatment initiated for stone-disease were recorded. A PSF calculation was performed on the 24 hour urine sample using the 7 urinary parameters required: voided volume, oxalate, calcium, urate, pH, citrate and magnesium. A repeat 24-hour urine sample was performed for PSF calculation after treatment. Comparison was made between the PSF scores before and during treatment.

Results

At baseline, 20 of the 26 patients (77%) had a high PSF score (> 0.5). Of the 26 patients, 17 (65%) showed an overall reduction in their PSF profiles with a medical treatment regimen. Eleven patients (42%) changed from a high risk (PSF > 0.5) to a low risk (PSF < 0.5) and 6 patients reduced their risk score but did not change risk category. Six (23%) patients remained in a high risk category (> 0.5) during both assessments.

Conclusions

The PSF score reduced following medical treatment in the majority of patients in this cohort.

Key words: Probability; Calculi; Lithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Stone disease is an increasingly prevalent condition throughout the world with a global average lifetime prevalence of around 10% (range 8 to 22%) (1-5). On average, the recurrence rate is 50% within 5 years but some patients form stones much more frequently (6). Treatment costs are high (7,8). Epidemiological studies have linked stone disease to obesity, metabolic syndrome, and also to fluid, protein and salt intake (9-11). Lifestyle changes, dietary strategies and medical therapy have been shown to reduce recurrence (12). These preventive strategies reduce the recurrence rate and are cost effective (13-15). In order for prevention strategies to be effective an early and objective measure of response would help to encourage patient compliance. Various mathematical algorithms have been developed to analyse urine biochemistry to determine risk (16-23) but none has been adopted universally. In this study we applied the PSF (probability of stone formation) algorithm (22,23) to data from a cohort of Brazilian patients before and during treatment to investigate the changes in their PSF scores. The aim was to confirm that PSF changed appropriately following medical therapy and to determine whether PSF might be used to help tailor treatment for recurrent stone formers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected on 26 Brazilian stone-formers attending Urolithiasis Metabolism Outpatient Clinics - Paulista State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Botucatu, UNESP (Protocol CEP 3331-2009) and all patients gave their informed consent. Details of patient age, gender, weight and height were recorded. A baseline 24-hour urine sample was collected from each patient prior to treatment for a full metabolic evaluation. PSF analysis included 7 urinary parameters: voided volume, oxalate, calcium, urate, pH, citrate and magnesium. The PSF algorithm is based on a Bayesian mathematical formula which weights each of the contributory risk factors according to a set of “risk curves” derived from frequency distributions in a large number of idiopathic stone-formers and their controls (22,23). The PSF algorithm produces values between 0 and 1 for 5 different patterns of stone (calcium oxalate, urate, calcium phosphate, mixed calcium oxalate and urate and mixed calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate). PSF scores greater than 0.5 suggest a high stone risk (23). All patients in this cohort received some form of medication for treating stone disease, many received polypharmacy. Details of the patients’ medication were recorded. All patients were advised to increase their fluid intake in order to mantain a colorless urine output (at least 2 liters per day). A repeat 24-hour urine sample was performed for PSF calculation during treatment. Repeat 24-hour urine collections were performed a minimum of 4 months after treatment commenced.

RESULTS

The cohort included 26 patients (15 women and 11 men) with a mean age of 45.4 years (median 46, range 28-67) and a mean BMI of 27.8 (median 28.1, range 15.6 - 39.9). All patients had complete values for the 7 parameters required for the PSF calculation before and during treatment (Table-1).

Table 1 24 hour urine values for the 7 parameters required in the PSF algorithm both before and after treatment. 24 hour urine volumes less than 1.5L / 24hours are highlighted in dark grey. For other parameters those outside normal European Association of Urology (EAU) reference values are highlighted light grey and those falling outside the EAU suggested limits for medical attention are highlighted in black. 

The majority of patients were high risk for calcium stones before treatment according to the PSF scores. For calcium oxalate (p = 0.0004), mixed calcium oxalate/calcium phosphate (p = 0.006) and calcium phosphate stone risks (p = 0.002) there were significant overall reductions in PSF score within the cohort following treatment (paired t-test) (Figure-1). There was only one patient in the cohort with a high PSF score (> 0.5) for uric acid stones (patient 3). This patient’s PSF score dropped to almost 0 after treatment. At baseline 20 of the 26 patients (77%) had at least one high PSF score amongst their 5 PSF scores (> 0.5) (Table-2). Of the 26 patients, 17 (65%) showed an reduction in their PSF profiles with an aggressive medical treatment regimen (Table-3). 11 patients (42%) changed from a high risk (PSF > 0.5) to a low risk (PSF < 0.5) in at least one of their PSF scores and 6 patients reduced their risk score but did not change risk category. Six (23%) patients remained in a high risk category (> 0.5) in both assessments (Table-2). Two patients showed an increase in risk between tests - one because of a marked increase in urinary oxalate (patient 19) and the other because of a major decrease in urine volume (patient 26). One patient was in the low risk category in both tests (Table-2).

Figure 1 Graphs to show mean PSF score and standard deviation in each PSF category for the 26 patients in the study. PSFs above 0.5 are considered high. 

Table 2 Comparison of PSF scores at baseline and following treatment. The PSF scores give probabilities for each type of stone (UA - uric acid, CaOx – calcium oxalate, CaP – calcium phosphate). Overall there is a significant reduction in the PSF scores after treatment (paired t test, p<0.0001). Values range from 0 to 1 and the higher the value the greater the risk of forming that type of stone. Those approaching the threshold of 0.5 are highlighted in light grey and those above the threshold of 0.5 are highlighted in black. 

Table 3 Medications used by patients in the cohort following baseline evaluation. 

Drug Number of patients (%) Drug Number of patients (%)
Either KCit or MgCit 21 (81%) Statins 5 (19%)
Potassium Citrate (KCit) 18 (69%) OxMg 4 (15%)
Hydrochlorothiazide 17 (65%) Drugs for type 2 diabetes 4 (15%)
Antihypertensive 15 (58%) antidepressants 2 (8%)
Allopurinol 13 (50%) Antibiotics 2 (8%)
Magnesium citrate (MgCit) 7 (27%) others 3 (12%)

DISCUSSION

This paper highlights several points about the metabolic management of stone formers and use of the PSF algorithm. The majority of this small cohort of Brazilian patients was found to have a high PSF score prior to prophylactic treatment. This suggests that the algorithm developed in British populations is applicable in a population with a different genetic background and environmental risk factors. In this connection, it has also been shown to apply to calculation of the biochemical risk of forming stones in populations from the oil-rich states of the Middle East where urine composition is very different from that in the West and, based on this study, in Brazil (5). Furthermore, the majority of patients demonstrated a significant reduction in PSF score following medical therapy suggesting that the PSF score might be an early surrogate for treatment response.

As demonstrated by the patients in this cohort, there are often abnormalities in 24-hour urine collections and it is difficult for the treating physician to know which are most significant and which to treat. The PSF algorithm weights each of the parameters to produce an overall risk. Although single factors may be within normal or just outside normal limits they can alter the overall risk profile significantly.

These data also emphasise how important it is to determine which aspects of a patient’s urinary profile contribute most to stone risk. Several patients in this cohort remained at high risk despite medical treatment. For the most part, this was due to persistently high urinary oxalate levels which will not be addressed by the routine pharmacotherapy prescribed in this cohort.

The limitations of this study are its small cohort size, the use polypharmacy which makes analysis of effect of individual drugs impossible, a single 24 hour urine collection before and after treatment and the absence of data on dietary influence or details of stone type. Larger, more comprehensive studies are required to validate further the use of PSF scoring in the management of stone disease over longer periods of treatment. Ideally, this should be correlated with a reduction in stone recurrence rate.

In order to reduce stone risk a holistic approach to risk determination must be taken and a personalized treatment plan including lifestyle, dietary advice, and pharmacotherapy should be advocated. Ideally, PSF score should be used in conjunction with dietary and lifestyle information to create a personalized treatment plan. Patients should be reviewed with repeat tests to check compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the PSF score changed from high to low risk following medical treatment in the majority of patients in this cohort. This makes PSF score a potentially useful short-term surrogate marker to assess stone risk. PSF score may be used as part of a more comprehensive evaluation of stone risk to reduce the likelihood of recurrent stones in individual patients.

REFERENCES

. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG: Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol. 2010; 12: e86-96. [ Links ]

. Turney BW, Reynard JM, Noble JG, Keoghane SR: Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int. 2012; 109: 1082-7. [ Links ]

. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS; Urologic Diseases in America Project: Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012; 62: 160-5. [ Links ]

. Boyce CJ, Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Kim DH, Bruce RJ: Prevalence of urolithiasis in asymptomatic adults: objective determination using low dose noncontrast computerized tomography. J Urol. 2010; 183: 1017-21. [ Links ]

. Robertson WG: Stone-formation in the Middle Eastern Gulf States – a review. Arab J Urol. 2012; 10: 265-72. [ Links ]

. Worcester EM, Coe FL: Clinical practice. Calcium kidney stones. N Engl J Med. 2010 2; 363: 954-63. [ Links ]

. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR; Urologic Diseases in America Project: Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 1808-14. [ Links ]

. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC; Urologic Diseases of America Project: Urologic diseases in America project: urolithiasis. J Urol. 2005; 173: 848-57. [ Links ]

. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med. 2004 26; 164: 885-91. [ Links ]

. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Obesity, weight gain, and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA. 2005 26; 293: 455-62. [ Links ]

. Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: new insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004; 15: 3225-32. [ Links ]

. Borghi L, Schianchi T, Meschi T, Guerra A, Allegri F, Maggiore U, Novarini A: Comparison of two diets for the prevention of recurrent stones in idiopathic hypercalciuria. N Engl J Med. 2002 10; 346: 77-84. [ Links ]

. Strohmaier WL: Economic aspects of evidence-based metaphylaxis. Urologe A. 2006; 45: 1406-9. [ Links ]

. Goldfarb DS, Coe FL: Prevention of recurrent nephrolithiasis. Am Fam Physician. 1999 15; 60: 2269-76. [ Links ]

. Robertson WG: Is prevention of stone recurrence financially worthwhile? Urol Res. 2006; 34: 157-61. [ Links ]

. Robertson WG: Measurement of ionized calcium in biological fluids. Clin Chim Acta. 1969; 24: 149-57. [ Links ]

. Werness PG, Brown CM, Smith LH, Finlayson B: EQUIL2: a BASIC computer program for the calculation of urinary saturation. J Urol. 1985; 134: 1242-4. [ Links ]

. Tiselius HG, Larsson L: Biochemical evaluation of patients with urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 1981; 7: 31-4. [ Links ]

. Tiselius HG: A simplified estimate of the ion-activity product of calcium phosphate in urine. Eur Urol. 1984; 10: 191-5. [ Links ]

. Laube N, Hergarten S, Hoppe B, Schmidt M, Hesse A: Determination of the calcium oxalate crystallization risk from urine samples: the BONN Risk Index in comparison to other risk formulas. J Urol. 2004; 172: 355-9. [ Links ]

. Shekarriz B, Stoller ML: Uric acid nephrolithiasis: current concepts and controversies. J Urol. 2002; 168: 1307-14. [ Links ]

. Robertson WG, Peacock M, Heyburn PJ, Marshall DH, Clark PB: Risk factors in calcium stone disease of the urinary tract. Br J Urol. 1978; 50: 449-54. [ Links ]

. Robertson WG: A risk factor model of stone-formation. Front Biosci. 2003; 8: s1330-8. [ Links ]

Received: August 22, 2013; Accepted: March 22, 2014

Correspondence address: João Luiz Amaro, PhD. Department of Urology. School of Medicine, São Paulo State University (UNESP). Botucatu, SP, 18618-970, Brazil. Telephone: +55 14 3880-1555. E-mail: jamaro@fmb.unesp.br

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Benjamin Turney, William Robertson, Oliver Wiseman, are directors of StoneScreen Ltd a company that provides advice for stone formers. Other authors have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.